Category: News

  • Canada’s Carney calls for unity as Alberta prepares for secession vote

    Canada’s Carney calls for unity as Alberta prepares for secession vote

    Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Thanksgiving message comes a week ahead of Alberta’s vote on a separatism referendum.

    Prime Minister Mark Carney has used his Thanksgiving message to Canadians to call for national unity, a week before the oil-rich province of Alberta is set to vote on a proposal to secede from Canada.

    “We can’t build big things on fault lines,” Carney said in his video message on Monday, warning that Canada faces threats to its economy, security and way of life.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    “We have to be strong, and we are stronger together.”

    His comments come as Albertans head to the polls on October 19 to decide whether to begin the process of seeking independence. The initial referendum is non-binding, but it proposes to hold a binding vote in the future to decide whether Alberta should secede.

    The question facing voters is: “Should Alberta remain a province of Canada, or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?”

    The vote follows a growing push by a vocal group of separatists, fuelled by longstanding grievances over federal energy and environmental policies.

    The secessionist movement has accused the Canadian government of unfairly targeting Alberta’s oil and gas industry, the cornerstone of the province’s economy.

    The movement is also being watched south of the border, as Canada’s relationship with the United States under President Donald Trump has become strained.

    An investigation by The Globe and Mail earlier this month revealed that US Republican operatives met with secession organisers in Alberta to talk about campaign strategies. Separatist leaders had reportedly offered access to the province’s water and oil royalties in exchange for US support for independence. Separatist leaders have disputed those claims.

    Carney’s comments also come after another secessionist movement, the Parti Quebecois, won the most seats in a provincial election in Quebec last week, allowing it to return to power after more than a decade.

    The Parti Quebecois, however, only won 59 seats out of a total of 129 in Quebec’s National Assembly, leaving it short of a majority government.

    Still, following that victory, US tech entrepreneur Elon Musk, considered the richest man on the planet, applauded the results. He has been known to use his wealth and influence to support political causes, particularly on the far right.

    “Good. Quebec should separate,” Musk wrote on social media. “They would be better off. Alberta and Saskatchewan should separate too.”

    Carney, who grew up in Alberta, said he was filming the message from a classroom at his former school, St Francis Xavier High School in Edmonton.

    “I’m back home a lot these days because we are building big things again in Alberta: thousands of new homes, high-speed rail, a new pipeline to the West Coast that will create lasting opportunity and prosperity for hundreds of thousands of people in this province and across the country,” he said.

    Despite the secessionist movement’s growing visibility, polls suggest most Albertans oppose independence.

  • Why the Cornell gang rape case has raised concerns about fraternity culture

    Why the Cornell gang rape case has raised concerns about fraternity culture

    For more than 40 percent of US presidents, the fraternity hall was an early stop on the road to the White House.

    Fraternal organisations, more commonly known as fraternities or frats, have a long and storied history on college campuses in the United States.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    One industry group, the North American Interfraternity Conference (NIC), represents 58 fraternities spread across 600 schools. It claims nearly 200,000 undergraduate students as active members and an alumni population of 4.2 million.

    The draw for college-aged men is the promise of brotherhood, a bond that transcends keg parties and late-night revelry. Like sororities and other members-only student organisations, fraternities are often touted as pathways to personal, academic and professional success.

    But critics argue that some fraternities have leveraged their exclusivity to encourage and normalise violence, dangling social acceptance as a reward for compliance.

    “This isn’t [some sort of] a hobbyist club,” said anthropologist Aldo Cimino, a Kent State University professor who studies fraternity hazing. “It is the seriousness of the affiliation that has generated the intensity of these induction rituals.”

    In recent weeks, one case has renewed debate over fraternity culture and whether the campus organisations use their exclusivity to shield bad behaviour.

    In September, an anonymous woman known as Jane Doe filed a civil lawsuit against the Chi Phi fraternity at Cornell University and seven of its members, accusing them of gang raping her during a party on the night of October 19, 2024.

    Doe’s sorority, Delta Delta Delta, and Cornell itself are among the co-defendants.

    Her lawsuit raises questions about fraternity and sorority culture at US schools, collectively known as “Greek life” for the groups’ use of Greek lettering and symbols.

    Upon her admission to Cornell, Doe argues she encountered a “glorified – yet materially false and misleading – facade” for Greek life.

    “She arrived on a campus where the University actively promoted Greek membership as a ‘vital’ part of the campus community and endorsed these organizations as well-managed, worthy pathways to new friendships and improving one’s educational and professional opportunities,” the lawsuit said.

    The complaint accuses the fraternities of instead perpetuating a pattern of sexual assault and abuse.

    What are fraternities?

    Now a multibillion-dollar industry, fraternities in the US trace their origins to men-only clubs established at some of the country’s oldest universities.

    The tradition began at the College of William and Mary in 1776, when Phi Beta Kappa was founded as a secret society for debate and scholarly exchange.

    Its adoption of the Greek alphabet, oath of secrecy, and arcane membership rites helped establish a blueprint for future fraternities and sororities. Often with houses of their own, fraternities eventually grew into informal extensions of the campus residential system.

    Historian Nicholas Syrett wrote about the origins of such groups in his book The Company He Keeps: A History of White College Fraternities.

    In an interview with Al Jazeera, he explained that fraternities have long embraced so-called masculine ideals. But those ideals have changed from generation to generation.

    In the past, fraternities sought to position themselves in “opposition to boyhood” by embracing “independence, strength of character, handsomeness and loyalty”, Syrett explained.

    But their modern iteration has shifted to include a greater emphasis on “athleticism, sexual success with women, and recklessness” as well as alpha-male posturing.

    Syrett argues that the fraternity system’s cult of toughness reflects a wider matrix of gendered expectations and social hierarchies.

    Early fraternity men, Syrett says, prized intellect and academic distinction, provided neither betrayed too much effort. But “this has largely taken a backseat in contemporary fraternities”, he explained.

    “When [men] are initiated, they are taught that loyalty to the brotherhood is of the utmost importance,” Syrett said of fraternities today. “This leads to the keeping of all kinds of secrets, including things that are against the rules and/or the law.”

    A mark of elite status

    In the two and a half centuries since the first fraternities were formed, Greek life has expanded to include different races and identities outside of white men.

    Some Greek groups have even eschewed the traditional gender divide altogether to better embrace transgender and non-binary members.

    But fraternities and sororities overall tend to act as “microcosms of the larger society”, according to Elizabeth Allan, a professor at the University of Maine and director of its Hazing Prevention Research Lab, “with race, pretty privilege and economic segregation helping shape the system”.

    “The [social] stratification that we see in the larger society is going to be reflected, in large part, in many of these organisations, unless they’re actively working to disrupt it,” she added.

    Between membership dues and rent at fraternity chapter houses, Greek organisations can price out all but the more affluent students, according to Allan.

    “Pretty privilege” – the social bias in favour of those deemed conventionally attractive – can add to the pressure, with sorority applicants in particular shelling out hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars for cosmetic treatments and outfits.

    Experts say the sense of exclusivity that many fraternities and sororities cultivate is a powerful draw for incoming students, who see membership as a path to upward social mobility.

    That perception is reinforced by the groups’ internal dynamics. Many sororities and fraternities encourage networking among members.

    A 2021 Gallup survey commissioned by the NIC and the National Panhellenic Conference found that 42 percent of fraternity or sorority alumni said a fellow member had helped them find an internship or job.

    Meanwhile, 51 percent of Greek members reported having a job waiting at graduation or found employment within two months. The rate was much lower among those who were not members of such fraternities or sororities, at 36 percent.

    How hazing shapes fraternities

    Critics often point to hazing rituals in particular as shaping a culture of violence at some fraternities and sororities.

    Hazing is a process through which prospective Greek life members undergo humiliating and sometimes perilous tasks to secure admission.

    The phenomenon is prohibited by law in most US states, though the definitions, penalties and scope of such laws vary. The consequences, however, can be deadly.

    One of the earliest recorded deaths associated with fraternity hazing took place at Cornell in 1873.

    At the time, a group of “pledges” – would-be fraternity members – were blindfolded and led far from campus at night, with instructions to make their way back on their own.

    In the dark, one of the pledges, Mortimer M Leggett, and two fraternity members stumbled over a cliff and plunged into the gorge of Six Mile Creek. The two fraternity members survived. Leggett, however, did not.

    Secret initiation rituals can forge an “informal psychological social contract in which members feel obligated to protect the organisation”, according to Pietro Sasso, who studies college student experience at Old Dominion University.

    Some members may feel the need to rally around the fraternity even when “doing so conflicts with their personal values or responsibilities to others”, Sasso added.

    “My research on fraternity cultures suggests that organisational socialisation can normalise behaviours that individuals might otherwise question, making the environment itself an important part of prevention,” he explained.

    Inside Doe’s lawsuit against Chi Phi

    Doe’s case cites some of the social pressures and incentives that lead young men and women to Greek life on campus.

    “She was drawn to the sorority and its promises of sisterhood and lifelong friendships, the status it conferred on its members, and the community it provided on campus when she was over 1,000 miles away from home,” the lawsuit said of Doe.

    But Doe said she joined Cornell’s Greek community without being fully aware of the pattern of sexual assault associated with the local fraternities.

    During Doe’s first semester, in 2022, there were at least five reported cases of victims at Cornell being drugged, and two alleged cases of sexual assault. All of those cases, according to her lawsuit, took place at fraternities.

    Two years later, on the night of the alleged gang rape, Doe claims she was pressured by fraternity members to take drugs like ketamine, marijuana and alcohol. After agreeing to a threesome, she said she found herself in a “room full of predatory, fraternity men” who raped her while she was incapacitated.

    A photo of a group chat included in her lawsuit shows one Chi Phi member informing his fellow fraternity brothers that there was “free pussy” in an upstairs alumni room. A member of the chat replies, “I f***ing love chi phi.” Another chimes in, “Like you can walk in and whip it out.”

    Several of the men have denied any wrongdoing.

    But the case has sparked questions about whether the culture of Greek life contributes to a high rate of sexual assault in fraternities and sororities.

    One 2021 survey published by the American Psychological Association tracked male students from high school through their second year of college. It found that fraternity members were 62 percent more likely to report sexual aggression during their first two years of college.

    Separately, a 2009 study published in the journal Violence Against Women estimated that 29 percent of sorority members reported suffering sexual assault during college, roughly four times the rate of non-members.

    Reforming Greek life

    After the alleged gang rape in 2024, Cornell’s Chi Phi chapter was closed, and the fraternity remains barred from campus. Two male defendants in Doe’s lawsuit were expelled, while another two were suspended.

    But some student activists say too little is being done to reform Greek life in the wake of Doe’s case. They want stronger measures to enforce accountability within private, members-only groups where secrecy often reigns.

    CJ Barles, a junior at the University of California, Davis, is one of the students across the US organising protests in support of Doe. She told Al Jazeera she understands the appeal of the fraternity and sorority systems.

    “Affiliated students say it looks good on their resume,” Barles explained. “They see it as a built-in cult, a seat at the table and a crew to call their own.”

    But Barles said she has heard troubling reports. Some fraternities, she explained, hold parties “requiring every man” to arrive with several women in tow. That requirement says “a lot about the culture some of these spaces cultivate”, she added.

    At a rally last week, Barles and other protesters called on the University of California system to implement new measures to hold fraternities accountable for sexual assault, including enshrining students’ right to withdraw consent during sexual encounters.

    But Barles said she left feeling dumbstruck by the accounts of sexual violence shared by women on campus, many of whom spoke from personal experience.

    “It’s unbelievably upsetting, the amount of stories I heard,” said Barles. The litany of grievances has fanned her scepticism of the Greek system: “I wouldn’t step within a mile of most of them.”

  • Why some Georgia DAs are pushing back against state law removing candidates’ party affiliations from ballots

    Why some Georgia DAs are pushing back against state law removing candidates’ party affiliations from ballots

    Claim:

    Ahead of the 2026 midterm election, Georgia removed candidates’ political party affiliation labels from ballots.

    Rating:

    Mixture

    What’s True

    In May 2026, Georgia Governor Bill Kemp signed House Bill 369 into law, which would make several county-level races in some of Georgia’s most Democratic counties “nonpartisan” — meaning that local candidates would run for office without party labels on the ballot. The law would only apply to five counties, including and surrounding Atlanta, the most diverse region in the state.

    What’s False

    However, the law doesn’t go into effect until Jan. 1, 2028, and as of this writing, county district attorneys are challenging the constitutionality of the bill in court. The law wouldn’t apply to the entire state, which the DAs argue violates Georgia’s uniformity clause.

    In the weeks leading up to the 2026 midterm elections, a claim circulated that Georgia lawmakers had removed political party labels from ballots in an effort to give Republicans a leg up in counties that have seen steady electoral wins for Democrats.

    Social media posts sounded the alarm, warning Georgia voters to bring sample ballots or memorize candidates before heading to the polls to avoid voting for someone on the basis of name recognition alone.

    “Georgia voters- It seems our Trump loving election denying Republican led election board has decided to remove the (R) and the (D) that normally appears next to candidate’s names on the upcoming midterm ballots. And you’re not allowed to use your phone while voting to look up affiliation,” an Oct. 4 Facebook post that was shared thousands of times read (archived). “They want you to either not vote in that category or hopefully choose the wrong one. A lot of incumbents are Republican so they’re hoping you’ll just choose by name recognition.”

    We looked into the claim and found that while it was true Georgia Gov. Bill Kemp signed House Bill 369 into law in Georgia in May 2026, making several county-level races “nonpartisan,” the law would not take effect until Jan. 1, 2028 — and only in five Atlanta-area counties, not the entire state. As a result, we’ve rated the claim a mixture of true and false information.

    The five counties’ district attorneys — all of whom are Black women representing the most diverse region of the state — argue the law is unconstitutional because it’s geographically limited to that region. Those counties include and surround state capital Atlanta, a Democratic stronghold.

    HB 369 applies the nonpartisan distinction to counties in which the elected office of county coroner has been abolished. It’s unclear precisely how lawmakers made the connection between nonpartisan coroner elections and the need to remove party affiliation labels from other candidates’ names.

    According to The Associated Press, state Sen. John Albers, a Republican from Roswell (an Atlanta suburb) said during a legislative session that he “believed it will promote public safety.” State Rep. Trey Kelley, also a Republican, reportedly claimed that “by passing this legislation, we’re giving voters the opportunity to rid themselves of district attorneys who are more concerned with playing partisan games than prosecuting and delivering justice.”

    In June 2026, DeKalb County District Attorney Sherry Boston announced she was filing a lawsuit challenging the law. She was accompanied by three out of the other four county DAs. We reached out to all five DA offices for comment, and a spokesperson from Clayton County responded reiterating that if the bill held by 2028, it would only deal with certain elected officials.

    A June 3 statement outlining the three grounds on which Boston’s lawsuit challenged the validity of the law read:

    1. Violation of Georgia’s Uniformity Clause – The Georgia Constitution requires that laws must work the same way throughout the state and prohibits lawmakers from enacting local or special laws that change the rules for one area of Georgia.  The Georgia Supreme Court has repeatedly held that laws that target just one or a handful of counties are unconstitutional.
    2. Violation of the Georgia and U.S. Equal Protection Clauses – Both the Georgia and United States Constitutions mandate that laws must protect all people equally. State lawmakers did not give any legitimate reason for treating the 5 metro counties, their elected officials, and their voters differently from the state’s other 154 counties.  They set them apart on the basis that they have medical examiners instead of coroners, which has no connection to the need for nonpartisan elections.  In addition, the five counties targeted have large Black voter populations and Black female District Attorneys.
    3. Violation of Georgia’s Rejected Bills Clause – Before lawmakers passed the nonpartisan county elections bill as HB 369, the same proposal failed a full vote of the Senate as SB 573.  Before the Legislature can take up a measure it previously rejected, the Georgia Constitution requires a two-thirds vote by the rejecting chamber.  That did not happen with HB 369.

    Gwinnett County District Attorney Patsy Austin-Gatson, in her August lawsuit of a similar nature, wrote that the law’s medical examiner distinction “is arbitrary and has no rational relation to the partisan status of county elections.” The lawsuit continued: “There is simply no reason why a county with a medical examiner should have a nonpartisan election for district attorney but a county with a coroner should have partisan elections for district attorney.”

    We also contacted state Rep. Jasmine Clark, a Democrat from Georgia, who has spoken about the bill on her social media. In a statement to Snopes via email, Clark’s office wrote that if voters want to see who and what are currently on their ballot, they can print a sample ballot at Georgia’s voting information page.

    Sources

    Amy, Jeff. ‘With Their Candidates Losing in Metro Atlanta, Georgia GOP Seeks to Remove Party Labels’. The Associated Press, 27 Mar. 2026, https://apnews.com/article/georgia-nonpartisan-party-elections-republicans-democrats-willis-878d379c03dcca87b60712d2e3c2bb49.

    Brumback, Kate. ‘District Attorney Challenges New Georgia Law That Removes Party Labels in Atlanta-Area Elections’. The Associated Press, 3 June 2026, https://apnews.com/article/georgia-district-attorney-elections-nonpartisan-republicans-kemp-9aeed6b014c27ae826533acef95805c6.

    ‘Dr. Jasmine Clark | Mother. Scientist. Truth Teller.’ Dr. Jasmine Clark for Congress, https://www.jasmine4ga.com/meetjasmine. Accessed 8 Oct. 2026.

    GA My Voter Page. https://mvp.sos.ga.gov/s/. Accessed 8 Oct. 2026.

    ‘Georgia Demographics – Map of Population by Race’. Census Dots, https://www.censusdots.com/race/georgia-demographics. Accessed 8 Oct. 2026.

    Montellaro, Zach. ‘Donald Trump Flips Georgia’. Politico, 17 Oct. 2025, https://www.politico.com/2024-election/results/georgia/.

    Moyer, Jameson. ‘Kemp Signs HB 369: Metro Atlanta Counties Face Nonpartisan Shift’. Text.Article. FOX 5 Atlanta, FOX 5 Atlanta, 13 May 2026, https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/kemp-signs-hb-369-metro-atlanta-counties-face-nonpartisan-shift.

    Plaintiff Patsy Austin-Gatson . ‘CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 26CV011821’. Lawsuit. 21 Aug. 2026, https://georgiarecorder.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/PAG-lawsuit-HB369.pdf.

    Raymond, Jonathan. ‘Kemp Says “I Really Haven’t Looked at” Bill That Would Make Many Local Elections in Five Metro Atlanta Counties Nonpartisan’. 11Alive, 2 Apr. 2026, https://www.11alive.com/article/news/politics/brian-kemp-responds-to-hb-369-bill-to-make-local-elections-in-fulton-dekalb-gwinnett-cobb-clayton-counties-nonpartisan/85-d7f8616a-4528-4dc3-abaa-2220e262a855.

    Representative Sharper of the 177th, et al. House Bill 369 (AS PASSED HOUSE AND SENATE). House Bill 369, https://www.legis.ga.gov/api/legislation/document/20252026/247976.

    Welcome to Dekalb County District Attorney. https://www.dekalbda.org/news_detail_T6_R428.php. Accessed 8 Oct. 2026.

  • Did Erika Kirk confront Heather Cox Richardson during panel?

    Did Erika Kirk confront Heather Cox Richardson during panel?

    Claim:

    Turning Point USA CEO Erika Kirk and political historian Heather Cox Richardson had a public confrontation during a panel in which Kirk said to Richardson, “Sit down, you 63-year-old academic.”

    Rating:

    False

    A rumor is circulating that a confrontation took place between Turning Point CEO Erika Kirk and historian Heather Cox Richardson during a panel. According to numerous Facebook posts over the past several months, Kirk insulted Richardson by poking fun at her age.

    One Facebook post stated: 

    Erika Kirk Insults Heather Cox Richardson: “Sit down, you 63-year-old academic” — But Her Response Shocked the Entire Nation

    Erika Kirk delivered the sarcastic remark with a cold, defiant stare that silenced the entire auditorium. Heather Cox Richardson did not react immediately — at least not for the first few seconds. The historian and public intellectual simply raised an eyebrow, tilted her head slightly, and offered a calm, knowing smile, as though she had grown accustomed to pressure, criticism, and high-stakes moments throughout years of service.

    Slowly, Heather Cox Richardson picked up the microphone, rose to her feet, and faced Kirk directly with the steady composure of someone who has spent a lifetime studying history and engaging the public with clarity and conviction.

    When Richardson finally spoke, her words were measured, confident, and deeply grounded — the voice of a woman in her 60s fully aware of her journey, her purpose, and her identity.

    Rather than reacting emotionally, she transformed the moment into something far greater than the insult itself.

    “I’m proud of every one of my years,” she said calmly. “They represent study, teaching, service, lessons learned, and the responsibility of standing up for something bigger than yourself. Age isn’t an insult — it’s a record of what you’ve contributed.”

    The Facebook post also linked to an article an ad-filled blog with the headline, “A Public Insult Sparked Silence—Then Heather Cox Richardson’s Response Changed Everything Forever.” 

    The above Facebook post and article describe an incident that never took place. The post is an example of “AI slop” — low-quality content that’s easy to create thanks to artificial intelligence tools. Such content can overwhelm social media feeds, leaving users unsure of what’s real and what’s not. As such, we rate this claim as false.

    News organizations would have covered the alleged dramatic interaction between the two public figures if it ever took place. However, our searches of Google, DuckDuckGo (archived) and Bing for any legitimate news coverage about such an interaction or panel found no results. 

    The post in question notes under the poster’s name that this is “AI content.” It links to an article on a blog that is clearly not a legitimate news organization. 

    (Facebook user “Carl Paoli”)

    The article does not give us a date or time of this interaction and did not even report on the exchange. When such stories spread online about controversies between public figures and without mentioning specifics of the events but encouraging readers to click on articles from unknown websites, they are often acting as “clickbait” — directing social media users to online advertising and unrelated content.

    The story also closely resembled other rumors we looked into about one public figure telling another to “sit down.” For example, one similar false claim involved U.S. President Donald Trump telling Pope Leo XIV, “Sit down — you’re just the pope.” In another, Trump’s son Barron allegedly told astronaut Christina Koch, “Sit down, you’re just an astronaut.” 

    Kirk gained prominence after the assassination of her husband, conservative activist and Turning Point USA CEO Charlie Kirk, on Sept. 10, 2025. She took over as the organization’s CEO after his death. A political historian, Richardson has been a vocal critic of Trump.  

    Snopes has debunked many AI slop rumors and written an explainer on this trend. 

    Sources

    “A Public Insult Sparked Silence—Then Heather Cox Richardson’s Response Changed Everything Forever .” Trendify1.Jervisfamily.Com, 1 Oct. 2026, https://trendify1.jervisfamily.com/posts/public-insult-sparked-silence-then-heather-cox-richardsons-response-changed-everything-pmai123456-team-apex-c7323d. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

    Izzo, Jack. “Snopestionary: AI Slop, Explained.” Snopes, 22 Aug. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//articles/470975/ai-slop-media-literacy/. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

    Loe, Megan. “25 ‘AI Slop’ Rumors We Debunked in 2025.” Snopes, 28 Dec. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//collections/2025-ai-slop-rumors/. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

    PerryCook, Taija. “False Claim about Erika Kirk Pregnancy Announcement Recirculates 1 Year after Husband’s Death.” Snopes, 10 Sept. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/erika-kirk-pregnancy-announcement/. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

    “Trump ‘openly Embracing’ Destruction of American Democracy: Heather Cox Richardson.” MS NOW, https://www.ms.now/morning-joe/watch/trump-openly-embracing-destruction-of-american-democracy-heather-cox-richardson-2513352771952. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
     

  • How good is this year’s flu shot? Here’s what to know about flu season

    How good is this year’s flu shot? Here’s what to know about flu season

    Walking down the street this week, it may seem like everyone is sneezing and hacking up a lung. But as health officials announce the start of an earlier than usual flu season, how worried should Canadians be? And as we head into Thanksgiving weekend, should we be scrambling to update flu and COVID-19 shots? 

    Some experts say that while this year’s flu season may have arrived on our doorstep sooner than usual, it’s not necessarily a cause for alarm — but other experts are stressing the importance of prevention in heavy-hit regions such as Toronto and Calgary, where one of this season’s two influenza deaths so far has occurred, according to authorities.

    The strain making up roughly 98 per cent of cases in Canada so far tends to be a milder one, according to Brian Ward, professor emeritus at the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre in Montreal.

    “So far at least, this looks like an H1N1 dominated year, and the years where H1N1 dominates, you can have very large outbreaks, but the number or the proportion of people … who get very sick, is relatively small compared to years that are dominated by H3N2,” he told CBC News. 

    “I’m not convinced yet that we’re actually seeing the beginning of a real outbreak. What we’re seeing is sort of isolated, small outbreaks.”

    But where the flu is striking, doctors say it’s striking hard. There are currently more than 400 confirmed flu cases in Alberta, where vaccines aren’t yet widely available.

    Some regions have started rolling out flu and COVID-19 shots to high-risk populations, with most regions set to offer shots to the general public by mid-October.

    Here’s what we know. 

    Is everyone getting sick right now? 

    According to the latest national numbers, which include data on influenza trends up to Oct. 3, there have been 3,315 detections of influenza across the country since the end of August. More than 1,140 of those cases were detected in the most recent week of available data, showing that cases are picking up.

    Influenza has been associated with two deaths so far this flu season, national figures state. The person who died in Alberta lived in the Calgary area and was in the 70-79 age range, authorities say. Authorities haven’t yet shared where the second death occurred.

    It’s an early start to the season. Between Sept. 27 and Oct. 3, 4.7 per cent of influenza tests came back positive, much higher than the average 0.6 per cent rate seen this time of year in 2023-2025. 

    But much of this national increase is driven by an uptick of cases in B.C. and in large cities such as Toronto and Calgary. Other areas seeing cases creep up include Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Alberta.

    “The rest of the country is really very quiet,” Ward said. 

    WATCH | B.C. launches fall immunization campaign:

    B.C. warns of early start to flu season, launches fall immunization campaign

    Flu season has started early this year and the province has launched its fall immunization campaign to prevent the spread. Dr. Jennifer Vines with the B.C. Centre for Disease Control shares what the vaccine rollout will look like and what precautions people can take to stay healthy.

    He noted that in B.C., outbreaks in long-term care homes are driving the increase in cases, warning that families getting together this holiday weekend could result in further spread.

    “That may be the seed that moves the virus … into the schools and universities and marketplaces and so on.”

    Official figures don’t catch every case of flu, as not everyone seeks out a test when they fall ill. 

    In hard-hit Toronto, family doctor Joseph Param told CBC News the increase of flu patients he’s seeing at his practice is mainly among young adults who are more likely to travel on public transit and may still go to work when feeling under the weather, perhaps because they’re used to flu season starting later. 

    WATCH | Ontario deals with earlier-than-usual flu season:

    You’re not imagining it — flu season has started early this year

    Some Ontario doctors say they’re noticing an early start to this year’s flu season in their waiting rooms, as influenza cases tick up across the province ahead of schedule.

    “Over the last couple of weeks, patients who are very healthy who see me rarely have been coming in with severe symptoms,” he said.

    “So it is important that the general population is aware that we are seeing … early cases now and so that we start taking precautions earlier than expected.”

    Doctors advise Canadians to stay home if they feel ill and to get vaccinated as soon as shots become available in their area, particularly with the long weekend coming up. 

    How effective is the flu shot this year? 

    The protection of flu shots varies from year to year depending on the most dominant strain of influenza in your area.  

    This year, it’s a “good” match, Ward said. Although H3N2 viruses dominated for much of 2025, that subtype hasn’t cropped up much in 2026, and this year’s vaccine is well-positioned to protect against H1N1. 

    He said “influenza viruses march to their own drummers” and can mutate even within one flu season. 

    It’s not just flu season in Canada — historically, we see more respiratory illnesses in general cropping up during the fall and going into winter, including colds and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), the latter of which is most dangerous in young children.

    A doctor gives a shot to a patient in the arm.

    About 98 per cent of lab-confirmed cases of influenza in Canada since the end of August have been of the H1N1 strain, according to government data. (New Africa/Shutterstock)

    Rates of COVID-19 are currently trending lower right now than last year, with 4.1 per cent of tests coming back positive in the last week of September compared with 10.5 per cent at the same time in 2025. 

    The National Advisory Committee on Immunizations (NACI) said in September that it continues to “strongly recommend” the latest COVID-19 booster shots for those at a higher risk of developing severe COVID-19, including health-care workers, adults over the age of 65, those with immunocompromised systems and people in long-term care homes.

    When can I get my flu and COVID-19 shots? 

    Several provinces such as Prince Edward Island and Nova Scotia are already advising residents that appointments for flu vaccines and COVID-19 booster shots are available now for residents over the age of six months. 

    New Brunswick, Saskatchewan and Manitoba are currently allowing residents to book their flu and COVID-19 vaccines, with immunization efforts officially kicking off on Oct. 13. 

    Those living in Newfoundland and Labrador can receive flu and COVID-19 shots starting Oct. 19. 

    In Ontario, flu and COVID-19 immunizations have been available since last week for high-risk groups, including seniors aged 65 and up, hospitalized patients, long-term care residents and health-care workers, according to the provincial government. They don’t open to the general public until Oct. 26. 

    In Quebec, you can start making appointments as of Oct. 13, but the flu and COVID-19 vaccination campaign itself doesn’t begin until Oct. 20. It is only free to eligible residents deemed high-risk, meaning non-eligible residents must pay for the shots. 

    Flu and COVID-19 shots can be booked now in Alberta, with the first appointments starting Oct. 19. While flu shots are free to everyone, Albertans who aren’t considered high-risk for COVID-19 will have to pay. 

    In B.C., those registered in their Get Vaccinated system will receive a notification reminding them to get their flu shots. Flu and COVID-19 shots are available starting Oct. 13. 

    COVID-19 and flu shots will be available at specific clinics in the Northwest Territories this fall, but a timeline hasn’t been released yet. Those in Yukon have been able to book appointments for flu and COVID-19 shots since the end of September. No details have been released for Nunavut’s rollout as of Oct. 8. 

    Before heading out to the pharmacy or clinic, it’s important to check the requirements in your area to be sure you’re eligible and that providers near you have received the necessary supplies to offer shots and aren’t experiencing delays.

    Most regions offer RSV vaccines to eligible patients as well. 

    In the future, we could see more variety in our flu vaccines: an mRNA influenza vaccine made by Moderna was approved by the FDA in the U.S. in the summer, making this the first flu season it’ll face. It’s still under review by Health Canada.

  • US Homeland Security secretary sees no ‘risk’ from livestreamed execution

    US Homeland Security secretary sees no ‘risk’ from livestreamed execution

    United States Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin has defended the planned livestreaming of Nidal Hasan’s execution, playing down warnings that images of his death by firing squad might be used as a propaganda tool for violent groups.

    In an interview on Sunday with the CBS News show Face the Nation, Mullin framed the decision as part of President Donald Trump’s hardline approach to crime.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    “I follow President Trump. He’s a commander-in chief of the country,” Mullin said, crediting the Republican leader with “restoring America values”.

    Mullin also brushed aside concerns that the images of Hasan’s execution could be leveraged against the US.

    “I don’t see an elevated risk at this point at all because of this,” Mullin said. “I think people need to understand, if you attack America, we will come after you, and we will make sure that the punishment fits the crime.”

    Hasan, a former US Army major, was sentenced to death in August 2013 after being convicted of shooting and killing 12 unarmed active-duty soldiers and a retired serviceman at the Fort Hood military base in Texas.

    The attack took place on November 5, 2009, when Hasan opened fire in a medical facility on the base where service members receive routine check-ups before deployment. The incident is considered one of the deadliest mass shootings to take place on a US military base.

    Another 32 people were injured in the shooting. In the process of responding to the attack, police on the military base shot Hasan, leaving him paralysed from the waist down.

    Critics have questioned the optics of broadcasting a firing squad killing of a man in a wheelchair. The livestreamed execution is scheduled for December 3.

    But Mullin dismissed those concerns, arguing that viewership is optional. “Once again, no one has to watch it if they don’t choose to,” Mullin said.

    Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had announced plans last week to livestream the upcoming execution, triggering a wave of criticism. But Trump on Saturday suggested he may reconsider the decision.

    “There are two thoughts: Don’t show it and show it. Because, you know, by showing it, maybe other people won’t be doing what he did,” Trump told reporters outside the White House.

    “So I’ll make a decision, ultimately. I know what the military would like to do, but we’ll make a decision.”

    FILE - This undated photo provided by the Bell County Sheriff's Department shows former Army psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Hasan. (Bell County Sheriff's Department via AP, File)
    Former Army Major Nidal Hasan was sentenced to death for a 2009 mass shooting at Fort Hood, Texas [File: Bell County Sheriff’s Department via AP Photo]

    Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, however, have denounced the idea of a public execution.

    In a Sunday morning appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press, Republican Senator Thom Tillis warned that broadcasting Hasan’s death would “put at risk” US lives.

    “Terrorist organisations will use this as a recruiting tool. It will radicalise other people, and this is not who we are,” Tillis said.

    “Look, the Fort Hood shooter should be put to death, but there’s a way to deal with this that’s proper, and there’s a way to deal with this that’s more improper than I have ever observed in my life.”

    Tillis, whose term as senator ends in January, also directed criticism at Hegseth for what he suggested was reckless leadership.

    “It’s another example of why Pete Hegseth and all of his bravado needs to get the hell out of the Department of Defense, because he is a failed leader,” Tillis said.

    The senator was considered one of the deciding votes in Hegseth’s January 2025 confirmation vote, and he has since called his support for Hegseth’s cabinet nomination “the biggest regret” of his tenure.

    Other Republicans echoed Tillis’s concerns about the livestream. Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, for instance, compared the public execution with something she would expect “from terrorists and dictators”.

    She also argued that Hasan has sought public attention, something he would receive in a broadcast execution.

    “It would give this individual, who deserves no further notoriety, the martyrdom he seeks,” Murkowski added.

    Republican Representative Tom Barrett of Michigan, a former military member, issued a statement on Friday explaining that he had trained at Fort Hood a year before the attack.

    He also said he opposed the public execution, despite considering Hasan “evil”.

    “Secretary Hegseth should seriously reconsider this decision,” Barrett wrote on X.

    “Making a public spectacle out of an already tragic situation is unnecessary and does not serve a public interest.”

    Military executions are extremely rare in the US and can only be approved by the president under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

    If the order against Hasan is carried out, he will be the first member of the US military to be executed since 1961.

  • ‘Energy ceasefire’: What’s behind Trump’s love-hate ties to Russian oil?

    ‘Energy ceasefire’: What’s behind Trump’s love-hate ties to Russian oil?

    US President Donald Trump has announced an immediate “energy ceasefire” between Russia and Ukraine, days after easing sanctions on Russian fuel to tackle soaring domestic and global fuel prices.

    The energy truce, announced on Sunday, marks another shift in Washington’s approach to Russian energy, as the Iran-US war and recent Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy facilities disrupted global oil supplies and pushed up fuel prices. Trump has even asked Ukraine not to attack Russian oil facilities, as Moscow remains a major exporter of diesel.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    The spike in diesel prices in recent weeks has particularly put pressure on Trump’s Republican Party ahead of November’s midterm elections. Surveys show Americans hold the Trump administration responsible for the soaring fuel prices amid the unpopular US war on Iran.

    “Attacks on refineries and energy facilities have taken capacity out of an already stretched global fuel market, pushing up costs for transport, agriculture and businesses, with the pain ultimately passed on to consumers,” Susannah Streeter, chief investment strategist at Wealth Club, told Al Jazeera, referring to the mutual attacks on energy sites by Ukraine and Russia.

    “A genuine ceasefire could help protect supplies and ease some of that pressure, particularly as winter approaches.”

    However, she warned it was too early to call it a “diplomatic breakthrough”, citing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s statement that the energy truce came as a surprise to him.

    Trump’s decisions have drawn criticism from US politicians and European allies, who warn that allowing Russian fuel back into global markets could provide Moscow with new revenue to finance its war in Ukraine. In March, the Trump administration gave a sanctions waiver to Russian seaborne oil.

    So, why has Trump repeatedly changed his position on Russian energy, and what is behind his latest decisions?

    What is the ‘energy ceasefire’ Trump announced?

    On Sunday, Trump said Russia and Ukraine had agreed to immediately stop attacking each other’s energy infrastructure.

    “Both parties have agreed. Do not break it!” he wrote on Truth Social, without providing further details.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he was not aware of the energy truce, saying the deal was “news to me” but welcomed the announcement nonetheless.

    However, he said Russian drones continued targeting Ukrainian energy facilities, including a power plant in Kharkiv, after Trump’s statement.

    “We are waiting for the details of the conditions between the Americans and Russians, ⁠⁠⁠⁠and we are waiting ⁠⁠⁠⁠to see one specific step the Americans are ready to take,” Zelenskyy said on Monday during a video address to a security conference in Warsaw.

    “This ⁠⁠⁠⁠energy ceasefire, it can work, and it can become a major step towards ending ‌‌‌‌the war if the Americans truly step in now and make ‌‌‌‌sure ‌‌‌‌Russians respect it.”

    INTERACTIVE - IRAN US WAR - OIL GAS CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION OCT11, 2026-1791699311
    (Al Jazeera)

    Ukraine has repeatedly targeted Russian oil refineries, arguing that energy revenues help fund Moscow’s war. Russia, meanwhile, has attacked Ukraine’s electricity and heating infrastructure throughout the four-year conflict.

    Academic Alexey Muriaev has urged caution over Trump’s announcement, questioning whether an agreement has actually been reached, and if so, what it entails.

    “Is it about suspending attacks on oil refineries? And if that’s the case, then the situation would be inadequate, because Ukraine’s oil refineries have already been taken out by Russia’s strikes beforehand,” Muraviev, senior research fellow in Defence and Strategic Studies at Edith Cowan University, told Al Jazeera.

    “So, in this sense, it would mean effectively Ukraine suspending unilateral action against Russia’s oil refinery facilities.”

    Muriaev also linked the announcement to Trump’s diesel agreement with Russian President Vladimir Putin, suggesting it may be a signal to Zelenskyy.

    “Attacking Russian oil refinery capability would probably be interpreted by Washington as an attack on US economic interests,” he said, referring to the agreement on diesel exports through April 2027.

    What’s the state of global oil prices?

    The ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine have continued to keep global oil markets under pressure.

    On Monday, Brent crude, the international benchmark, fell to about $103.04 a barrel following Trump’s ceasefire announcement and Russian diesel deal, while US West Texas Intermediate crude traded at about $90.96.

    However, prices remain elevated because of the US-Israel war on Iran, which began on February 28, and disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway through which one-fifth of the world’s oil supplies flow.

    Recent attacks on Saudi oil installations and airports by Yemen’s Houthis and the fighting around the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandeb Strait have put further pressure on oil prices.

    Ukrainian attacks on Russian refineries have compounded diesel shortages, affecting a fuel essential for the agriculture and trucking industries.

    The crisis prompted the Group of Seven nations last week to agree to release 100 million barrels of emergency oil and diesel reserves. The G7 decision came after pressure from Trump.

    How has the Trump administration zig-zagged between punishing and embracing Russian energy?

    Washington’s approach to Russian energy has shifted repeatedly since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

    Under President Joe Biden, the US banned Russian oil and energy imports in March 2022, seeking to cut off revenue used to finance Moscow’s war.

    But Washington simultaneously supported a G7 price cap on Russian oil, designed to restrict Moscow’s earnings without removing too much supply from global markets.

    Moreover, the Biden administration also accepted India’s continued purchases of Russian crude to prevent global prices from rising.

    After returning to power last year, Trump initially intensified pressure on Moscow. In August 2025, his administration imposed additional tariffs on Indian goods over New Delhi’s purchases of Russian oil.

    INTERACTIVE-Who buys Russian crude oil - August 5, 2025 copy-1789649792
    (Al Jazeera)

    Two months later, Washington sanctioned Russian energy giants Rosneft and Lukoil, accusing Moscow of failing to seriously pursue peace negotiations to end the war in Ukraine.

    However, Washington’s approach took a dramatic turn this year. On March 5, Washington issued a 30-day waiver allowing India to buy Russian oil stranded at sea, as disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz amid US attacks on Iran threatened global supplies.

    A week later, the Trump administration expanded the exemption, allowing countries worldwide to buy sanctioned Russian oil and petroleum products already loaded onto tankers, with the waiver lasting until April 11.

    In September, Trump urged Ukraine to stop attacking Russian refineries, blaming the strikes for global diesel shortages.

    On October 9, he announced an agreement with Russian President Putin for Moscow to release more than 300,000 tonnes of diesel immediately, with another 1.5 million tonnes to follow.

    Why has Trump changed his position on Russian oil frequently?

    Trump’s shifting public position on Russian energy reflects ongoing, and often competing, political and economic pressures.

    “Trump is caught between his geopolitical ambitions and the domestic political consequences of expensive energy,” Susannah Streeter of Wealth Club, told Al Jazeera.

    She said Washington was trying to pressure Moscow over its war in Ukraine while simultaneously allowing Russian fuel sales that could generate additional revenue for the Kremlin.

    “The shift may deliver a short-term political gain if supplies increase and prices ease, but it could come at a longer-term diplomatic cost,” she said, adding that the benefits appeared limited while the Middle East war continued.

    US diesel prices reached a record $6.52 per gallon in September, placing Trump under pressure ahead of the November 3 midterm elections.

    However, according to academic Muriev, the US president’s public rhetoric should be distinguished from his administration’s actions.

    “I don’t really see inconsistency in Trump’s approach because, apart from his public rhetoric, apart from his frequent media posting, there’s been a more steady approach on behalf of his administration,” he told Al Jazeera.

    He pointed to discussions between Russian and American officials in August and September, suggesting that negotiations over the latest diesel agreement may have begun well before Trump’s announcement last Friday.

    Muriev suggested the timing of the announcement could be politically motivated, allowing Trump to claim a victory on energy prices before the midterms.

    Moreover, Moscow also has an interest in helping Trump retain political influence because his administration appears more willing to negotiate with Russia than former President Biden was. Trump has  been relatively more accepting of the Russian position on the Ukraine war and has even blamed Zelenskyy for failing to end the war.

    “For Putin, it’s not just about scoring immediate economic benefit, but also achieving longer-term political and strategic goals,” Muriev said, referring to other issues such as Iran, cybersecurity, space cooperation and nuclear arms control.

    The energy crisis has also created contrasting consequences for American businesses.

    While higher oil prices can boost revenues for US energy producers, they increase operating costs for businesses dependent on fuel.

    Susannah Streeter said cheaper diesel could provide relief to trucking companies, farmers and manufacturers, although the additional Russian supplies were unlikely to make a significant difference while disruptions in the Middle East continued.

    She also warned that frequent changes to sanctions could create uncertainty for companies making long-term investment and supply-chain decisions.

    “If sanctions are relaxed, reimposed or changed at short notice, companies face greater uncertainty over sourcing, compliance and the risk of being caught on the wrong side of a policy reversal,” she said.

  • Nobel economics prize awarded to Robert Hall and Michael ⁠Woodford

    Nobel economics prize awarded to Robert Hall and Michael ⁠Woodford

    The Swedish academy says the academics’ models are ‘now used by central banks and ​governments around the world’.

    The ⁠2026 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences has been awarded to US academics Robert Hall and Michael ⁠Woodford for their work on how monetary and fiscal policy can help stabilise fluctuations in the economy, according to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

    The winners of the prestigious award, formally known ⁠as the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel and the final prize to be given out this year, were announced on Monday.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 4 itemsend of list

    The two laureates developed new macroeconomic models that improve people’s ability to implement effective stabilisation policies, enabling fiscal and monetary policy measures that can reduce damaging swings in the economy.

    “The laureates’ work has provided us ‌with a stable theoretical foundation for the models that are now used by central banks and governments around the world,” John Hassler, chair of the Committee for the Prize in Economic Sciences, said in a statement.

    “With them, we are better equipped to deal with shocks in the economy, such as energy crises or sudden changes in how much households consume.”

    During the oil crises in the 1970s, the existing Keynesian models used to determine when and how measures should be implemented to tackle recessions or other economic fluctuations stopped working. Hall and Woodford then developed new tools to understand what policy responses could be the most effective.

    “Rather than basing the models on statistical links between macroeconomic variables, such as inflation, production and consumption, they chose to build them on a microeconomic foundation,” the academy said. “This encompasses an understanding of how the total mass of individual households and businesses affect the economy through their actions.”

    The economics prize, first awarded ⁠in 1969, is not part of the five original awards ⁠created in the 1895 will of industrialist and dynamite inventor Alfred Nobel, but was instead established by Sweden’s central bank.

    The majority of previous laureates have been from the United States. Only three women have ⁠ever won, most recently Claudia Goldin in 2023 for her work on how gender has affected pay and employment over time ⁠in the US.

    Last year’s winners – Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt – won for ‌their work on “creative destruction” and how new technology and production methods can boost growth and living standards.

    Like the other Nobel awards, the economics prize consists of a diploma, a gold medal, and a $1.2m cheque.

    The Nobel prizes for medicine, physics, chemistry, literature and peace were announced last ‌week, with South African jurist Navi Pillay and Canadian writer Anne Carson among the winners.

  • Does photo show Hitler inspecting model of never-built triumphal arch planned for Berlin?

    Does photo show Hitler inspecting model of never-built triumphal arch planned for Berlin?

    Claim:

    A black-and-white photo authentically depicts Adolf Hitler and other Nazi Party leaders inspecting a model of a triumphal arch planned for Berlin.

    Rating:

    True

    In September 2026, a black-and-white photo spread widely purportedly showing Adolf Hitler and other Nazi Party officials inspecting a model of a triumphal arch they hoped to build in Berlin.

    Beneath one Reddit post (archived), commenters compared the arch, which was never constructed, to U.S. President Donald Trump’s plan to construct a massive triumphal arch of his own in Washington, D.C., just outside the grounds of Arlington National Cemetery.

    Snopes readers contacted us to determine whether the picture is real.  

    In short, the photograph is authentic.

    Among the many unfinished projects of Nazi Germany was a plan to redevelop the capital, Berlin, and rename it “Germania.” Nazi Party chief architect Albert Speer was put in charge of the design and built a model of the planned city.

    Among the buildings was a massive, triumphal arch. The black-and-white photo authentically shows Hitler inspecting the model, presumably designed by Speer.

    A reverse image search revealed the picture is on stock image website Alamy, which credits the photograph to the archives of the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung.

    Though the “Date taken” information reads Jan. 1, 1939, Alamy also says the picture is “undated.” Berlin is noted as the location. The “More information” caption reads:

    Adolf Hitler inspects a modell of a planned triumphal arch. Adolf Hitler and other party functionaries inspect the modell of the triumphal arch, which was planned to be built after the end of the war in Berlin. Undated picture. Date created: 01/01/1939-31/12/1945

    Snopes contacted Süddeutsche Zeitung to learn more about the photo’s history. A spokesperson for the paper said in a statement that it licenses images from its historical archives through Alamy. Therefore, the picture came from the archives of a reputable news publication.

    Running the photograph through several tools that detect content generated using artificial intelligence software uncovered no signs that it was AI-generated.

    A history of triumphal arches

    Historians trace the history of triumphal arches back to ancient Rome. During the Roman Republic, the “triumph” was an extravagant parade the Roman Senate granted to a Roman general (and his army) following a particularly remarkable conquest. Three triumphal arches were built during this period, according to Britannica, but none survive.

    During the imperial period, however, Roman emperors frequently declared triumphs for themselves (regardless of their military accomplishments), often building arches as a commemoration. There are three — the Arches of Titus, Septimus Severus and Constantine — still standing in Rome.

    The Arc de Triomphe in Paris, built to commemorate the conquests of Napoleon Bonaparte, is one of many arches still extant around the world that pay architectural homage to the Roman triumphal arch. They are built for many reasons —  New York City’s Washington Square Arch commemorated 100 years since George Washington’s inauguration, for instance, while New Delhi’s India Gate is a war memorial.

    Trump first mentioned the idea of a triumphal arch in Washington, D.C., in October 2025. When CBS News asked who the arch was for, Trump pointed at himself and said “me.” The arch — which has been the subject of multiple lawsuits claiming its construction was not approved in the proper manner or could pose risks to aviation safety and emergency services — would stand 250 feet tall, commemorating the 250th anniversary of the United States.

    The Nazis, art and architecture

    The ideology of the Nazi Party, beyond the genocidal antisemitism, homophobia, racism, xenophobia and other assorted discriminatory practices, was built on a vision of completely remaking the nation of Germany. This remaking — or a “rebirth” — aimed to turn the state itself into a sort of religion, warping and twisting every aspect of society along the way.

    Attendance at this metaphorical “church,” of course, was mandatory. “Disagreement is a sign of diversity,” Italian writer and philosopher Umberto Eco wrote in his 1995 essay, “Ur-Fascism.” Diversity, therefore, would not be tolerated under Nazism.

    Part of this “spiritual” rebirth involved attempting to influence the nation’s arts and culture. In 1937, the Nazis ordered the confiscation of thousands of modern art pieces the party felt “insult[ed] German feeling.”

    The Nazis then had the confiscated works exhibited for the public to see in Munich. The exhibition was called “Degenerate Art.”

    The crusade against “degenerate art” also impacted architecture. The influential Bauhaus art school, pioneers in modern architecture, closed in 1933 on the orders of the Nazi regime. Speer, the architect (and Nazi Party member), quickly rose up the party’s ranks and found himself in Hitler’s inner circle. 

    While most of Speer’s designs for Germania were never constructed, at least one part of the vision remains. The “Schwerbelastungskorper,” German for “heavy load-bearing body,” is a massive concrete cylinder located in the Tempelhof neighborhood at the corner of General Pape Strasse and Loewenhardtdamm. 

    According to the structure’s Information Center website and The Guardian newspaper, it was built as a test for the planned triumphal arch’s northeast pillar, because engineers were concerned that Berlin’s swampy soil would not be able to hold the weight of the monumental structures. The cylinder was built in 1941, at least partially by prisoners of war. 

    Sources

    ‘Arlington County Takes Legal Action to Stop Trump’s 250-Foot-Tall Vanity Project’. Democracy Forward, 8 Oct. 2026, https://democracyforward.org/news/press-releases/arlington-county-takes-legal-action-to-stop-trumps-250-foot-tall-vanity-project/.

    “Calls for Nazi Art in Munich to Be Taken Down.” Dw.Com, https://www.dw.com/en/calls-for-nazi-art-in-munich-to-be-taken-down/a-63368860. Accessed 28 Sept. 2026.

    Connolly, Kate. “Story of Cities #22: How Hitler’s Plans for Germania Would Have Torn Berlin Apart.” The Guardian, 14 Apr. 2016. Cities. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/apr/14/story-of-cities-hitler-germania-berlin-nazis.

    “‘Degenerate’ Art.” Holocaust Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/degenerate-art-1. Accessed 28 Sept. 2026.

    ‘Der Schwerbelastungskörper’. Informationsort Schwerbelastungskoerper, https://schwerbelastungskoerper.de/der-schwerbelastungskoerper/. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.

    Eco, Umberto. “Ur-Fascism.” The New York Review of Books, vol. 42, no. 11, 22 June 1995. www.nybooks.com, https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/.

    ParkPlanning – Triumphal Arch at Memorial Circle. https://parkplanning.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?projectID=136973. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.

    Rennie, Daniel. “The Story Of Welthauptstadt Germania, Hitler’s Design To Raze Berlin And Rebuild It As A World Capital.” All That’s Interesting, 13 July 2025, https://allthatsinteresting.com/welthauptstadt-germania.

    Severo, Arco di Settimio, et al. ‘Arco Di Settimio Severo’. Turismo Roma, 14 Feb. 2023, https://www.turismoroma.it/en/places/arco-di-settimio-severo.

    ‘The Bauhaus in Exile: What Happened After Its Closure in 1933’. Das Bauhaus-Archiv / Museum Für Gestaltung, https://www.bauhaus.de/en/discover/article/the-bauhaus-in-exile/. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.

    Tito, Arco di, et al. ‘The Arch of Titus’. Turismo Roma, 1 Dec. 2022, https://www.turismoroma.it/en/places/arch-titus.

    ‘Travertine Arch’. Italia.It, https://www.italia.it/en/lazio/rome/arch-of-constantine. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.

    ‘Triumphal Arch – Washington, DC’. U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, 16 Apr. 2026, https://www.cfa.gov/system/files/meeting-materials/1-CFA-16APR26-1-EOP_DOI_Arch-pres%20%5BApr9%5D.pdf.

    ‘Von Berlin zu ”Germania”‘. Informationsort Schwerbelastungskoerper, https://schwerbelastungskoerper.de/von-berlin-zu-germania/. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.

  • Rumor falsely claims James Talarico was treated at Ohio mental health facility. Here are the facts

    Rumor falsely claims James Talarico was treated at Ohio mental health facility. Here are the facts

    Claim:

    In September and October 2026, U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico, a Democratic Texas state representative, received treatment at a mental health facility in Ohio.

    Rating:

    False

    In October 2026, a rumor spread that U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico, a Texas Democrat, had received treatment at a mental health care facility in Ohio. 

    The claim erupted after Talarico, a state representative, disappeared from the campaign trail for nearly 10 days. On Oct. 11, the candidate told Dallas NBC affiliate KXAS’s Phil Prazan in a video interview he’d been lying low at home due to a bout of influenza (archived).

    Still, social media posts claiming he had actually been hospitalized at a mental health facility the whole time multiplied on Facebook and X, where one post said, for example, “the flu thing was a BIG FAT LIE” (archived):

    Many Snopes readers emailed, asking us to verify whether the rumor was true. 

    As we outline below, we found no credible evidence to support the claim Talarico had received treatment at a mental health facility. Both the facility named in these rumors and Talarico himself denied the claim on social media. In addition, the timing of his alleged discharge didn’t match Talarico’s schedule. Snopes obtained visual evidence, which we reviewed but aren’t publishing due to privacy concerns, that Talarico was at his home in Austin every day for the entirety of his bout of flu.

    For these reasons, we rate the claim false.

    Two conservative influencers, Nick Sortor and Rhein Amacher, started the rumor, offering as evidence the recording of an alleged employee of the Lindner Center of Hope in Ohio appearing to say Talarico had just been discharged.

    Both Talarico and the Lindner Center of Hope denied he had ever been treated there. 

    We reached out to Sorter and Amacher, as well as to Talarico and the Lindner Center of Hope, for clarity and we will update this report should we receive a response.

    The rumor originated on X

    The rumor spread less than a month before the election, at a time when almost all polls in Texas showed Talarico narrowly ahead of his Republican opponent in the race, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

    On Oct. 11, Sortor and Amacher posted a short audio recording on X of a phone conversation between a male voice asking for “James Talarico” and a female voice, allegedly that of someone who worked at Lindner Center for Hope, appearing to say he was discharged earlier that evening. 

    Sortor (archived) and Amacher (archived) posted within minutes of each other, just after 1 p.m. Eastern time. Both claimed Amacher had had the exchange with the purported employee. In his post, Amacher wrote that a person who he understood to be an employee of the center said Talarico had been discharged “within the previous 24-48 hours”:

    I personally contacted @LindnerCtrHope in Mason, Ohio, to determine whether Talarico was or had previously been a patient. 

    During my recorded call, an individual identifying themselves as a female facility employee reportedly stated that Talarico was no longer a patient and had been discharged within the previous 24–48 hours.

    In the recording, however, the person tells Amacher the patient was “just discharged this evening.” The recorded exchange went as follows:

    ALLEGED EMPLOYEE: I do not find anyone with that name for the last four days that’s been discharged, and they’re not here in the building.

    AMACHER: OK, so nothing for James Talarico?

    ALLEGED EMPLOYEE: Um… let’s see, looks… well… this is what it’s today… Looks like he was just discharged this evening. That’s why I don’t have it.

    Amacher’s post included a purported screenshot of a call log showing he had attempted to contact the facility three times that day: at 8:53 p.m., 8:56 p.m. and 8:59 p.m.

    A subsequent X post by Amacher on Oct. 11 indicated the exchange took place “yesterday” — Oct. 10. We reached out to him for more details. 

    Talarico’s whereabouts on Oct. 9 and 10

    On Oct. 9 — the day before Amacher’s alleged call — Talarico made an appearance at the Austin City Limits festival, as photographs on the reputable image bank Getty Images show. 

    The evening of Oct. 10, Talarico attended Kacey Musgraves’ concert in Dallas, according to a post by Talarico’s campaign at 2:30 a.m. Oct. 11, indicating the video had been shot in the hours before (archived):

    (An earlier post by another X account confirmed Talarico was at the concert.)

    Musgraves played in Dallas Oct. 10 and 11, according to the website of the venue, the American Airlines Center.

    In a seeming attempt to justify the discrepancy between the time the alleged employee told him the patient was discharged and Talarico’s appearance in Austin the day before, Amacher posted again on X saying that the time of a patient’s discharge could be registered some time after the person has left the facility (archived):

    Mental health facility denies Talarico was a patient

    On Oct. 11, in response to the rumors, the Lindner Center of Hope posted on X to say Talarico had never been a patient (archived):

    Talarico shared the post, adding that he has never been to Ohio (archived):

    Further, Talarico spokesperson JT Ennis posted on X that the claim was a “lie” to “promote a pathetic conspiracy theory” (archived):

    Lastly, Snopes obtained visual evidence of Talarico being at home every day from Oct. 1 to 8, the day before he went to the music festival in Austin.

    Talarico has long been open about having Type 1 diabetes, a condition that increases the risk of complications when the person comes down with the flu, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    For further reading, Snopes has covered several rumors about Talarico, including the claim that he is vegan.