Category: News

  • HIV prevention drug hailed as breakthrough, but who gets access?

    HIV prevention drug hailed as breakthrough, but who gets access?

    A medicine injected just twice a year could transform the fight against HIV.

    In a 2024 clinical trial involving more than 2,000 young women in South Africa and Uganda, no participants who received lenacapavir contracted HIV.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 4 itemsend of list

    Developed by United States pharmaceutical company Gilead Sciences, the injectable drug can be used to prevent HIV.

    “It’s the most innovative tool that has reached the HIV arena for the last decade, because it’s the closest we have [to] a vaccine,” Carlota Baptista da Silva, global HIV lead at Doctors Without Borders (known by its French initials, MSF), told Al Jazeera.

    The World Health Organization has recommended the long-acting injectable as an additional form of pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP – medicine to reduce the risk of getting HIV.

    But the arrival of the drug comes at a challenging juncture in the global fight against HIV.

    International funding for HIV fell 18 percent in 2025, to $7.3bn, its lowest level in nearly two decades, according to the United Nations programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). The squeeze has already hit prevention programmes: The number of people receiving medicine to reduce risk fell from 1.4 million in 2024 to 1.1 million in 2025.

    That makes the arrival of a highly effective, twice-yearly prevention option significant. The question of who can access it is now more urgent.

    For MSF, the scientific question has largely been answered: lenacapavir can prevent HIV with remarkable efficacy.

    The fight now is whether the rules governing manufacture, price and supply will allow that scientific breakthrough to reach the people who need it.

    Why some countries are excluded

    In the United States, lenacapavir costs about $28,000 per person annually. Generic versions are expected to cost about $40 a year.

    A generic version is a copy of the original drug made by another manufacturer after the patent holder licenses the technology. It contains the same active ingredient, but it can be produced and sold at a much lower price.

    In June 2025, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved lenacapavir for HIV prevention, giving people the option of an injection twice a year. But in several low- and middle-income countries, access to cheaper versions is not expected at scale until 2027.

    Gilead is supplying its own version of lenacapavir at no profit for programmes supported by the Global Fund and the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), with rollouts under way in countries including South Africa, Kenya, Zambia, Nigeria and Eswatini.

    These are not the cheaper generic versions expected to cost about $40 per person a year. Gilead has licensed six manufacturers to produce those, with large-scale generic rollout expected in 2027.

    At least 26 middle-income countries are excluded from Gilead’s generics agreement, MSF says, including countries with rising HIV infections and some that helped test the drug. Among them are Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Peru.

    “People should not really help generate the evidence for breakthrough medicine and then find that their country is excluded from affordable generic access,” da Silva said.

    According to MSF, countries excluded from the licence accounted for close to 23 percent of new HIV infections globally in 2023.

    Gilead has since announced a separate agreement with the Pan American Health Organization, creating an access pathway for 14 Latin American and Caribbean countries outside its generic licensing territory, including Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Peru.

    MSF argues that leaves those countries dependent on Gilead rather than able to automatically buy the cheaper generics.

    MSF says it still cannot buy the drug

    For more than a year, MSF says it has sought permission to purchase lenacapavir directly from Gilead for its medical programmes, without demanding a discounted price.

    “Despite those requests, Gilead has not allowed MSF to purchase this medicine directly,” da Silva said.

    That matters particularly in humanitarian emergencies, she argues. People displaced by conflict or disaster may struggle to take a prevention pill every day, while sexual violence and other vulnerabilities can increase the risk of HIV.

    Daily PrEP pills are already available as an alternative to the injection. But unlike lenacapavir, they need to be taken consistently to provide protection. An injection offering six months of protection could be particularly valuable.

    “People living through conflict [and] humanitarian crises cannot be the last in line for medical innovation,” da Silva said.

    Gilead declined Al Jazeera’s request for an interview due to scheduling constraints.  In its emailed statement, it said its access strategy combines no-profit supplies, royalty-free licensing and regional agreements. It didn’t reply to questions about why it won’t sell its drug to MSF, or why certain countries were excluded from its generics agreement.

    The company plans to provide enough lenacapavir for up to three million people through 2028 as generic manufacturers scale up production, with large-scale generic rollout expected in 2027.

    MSF says that is nowhere near the scale required, pointing to projections that close to 20 million people worldwide need access to PrEP to substantially reduce new HIV infections. That includes all forms of PrEP, not just lenacapavir.

    But countries left outside Gilead’s generic licensing deal may have another option.

    Can governments bypass the patent barriers?

    World Trade Organization (WTO) rules allow governments, in some cases, to bypass a drug company’s patent so cheaper versions of a medicine can be made or imported without the company’s permission.

    They can also authorise government use of patents and challenge patents they consider weak or unjustified. The 2001 Doha Declaration affirmed WTO members’ right to use such safeguards to protect public health.

    Brazil has used them before in the fight against HIV. In 2007, after negotiations with pharmaceutical company Merck over the price of the HIV drug efavirenz failed, Brazil issued a compulsory licence allowing it to access cheaper generic versions of the medicine.

    Nearly two decades later, activists are urging Brazil to consider using those powers again for lenacapavir if patent barriers prevent affordable generic access.

    MSF says governments excluded from Gilead’s licence could consider those same legal safeguards for lenacapavir, including compulsory licensing, government-use authorisations and challenges to patents.

    It is also calling on Gilead to ensure its agreements with generic manufacturers do not prevent them from supplying countries where patent barriers have been removed through such measures.

    For MSF, the stakes go beyond lenacapavir. The way the drug is made available could determine whether one of the greatest advances in HIV prevention in decades reaches people based on need, rather than where they live or what their health systems can afford.

    “For a humanitarian medical organisation, we should not have to spend more than a year trying to find a way to buy a WHO-recommended medicine,” da Silva said.

  • Fox Business To Debut ‘Big Money In The Morning’ To Replace Maria Bartiromo’s Show

    Fox Business To Debut ‘Big Money In The Morning’ To Replace Maria Bartiromo’s Show

    Fox Business Network will launch Big Money in the Morning, with a lineup including Dagen McDowell, Brian Brenberg, Taylor Riggs and Barron’s Josh Schafer, later this month.

    The new show will take the 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. ET time slot formerly occupied by Mornings with Maria, which was hosted by Maria Bartiromo pulled from the air early last month. The new show will debut on Oct. 12.

    McDowell and Brenberg will move to the mornings from The Bottom Line, the 6 p.m. ET show which will end its run. Repeats of Kudlow will take its place. Meanwhile, the noontime The Big Money Show will add rotating co-hosts Cheryl Casone, Marcus Lemonis and Lou Basenese along with current host Jackie DeAngelis. Liz Claman will launch a new Friday night series, Claman’s Power Players, on Friday nights at 7 p.m. ET.

    Big Money in the Morning will be the network’s signature show in advance of the trading day. McDowell has been with Fox News since 2003 and was a founding anchor of Fox Business Network when it launched in 2007. Brenberg joined Fox Business Network in 2020, and Riggs joined in 2022. Schafer is a contributor across the network and is Barron’s Investor Circle Newsletter editor.

    The Big Money Show‘s DeAngelis has been co-host of the show since 2023. Casone was part of the team that launched Fox Business in 2007; Basenese, who joined the network last year, is executive vice president of market strategy at Prairie Operating Co. and founder of the financial news site TheBigSkinny.com. Lemonsis joined Fox earlier this year, and is executive chairman and CEO of Beyond.

    Fox News Media announced on Sept. 3 that Bartiromo was “no longer with” the network. Donald Trump’s trade adviser, Peter Navarro, wrote an op ed in which he said that Bartiromo shared a text from a Fox Business executive calling on producers to not highlight the president’s July speech on election interference. Most of the networks were concerned that the president would use the primetime address to bring up unfounded claims that the 2020 election was rigged.

  • Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Leading in polls in the Los Angeles mayor’s race, Nithya Raman went on a charm offensive Thursday with the film and TV industry, and Paramount‘s CEO David Ellison in particular.

    “To David Ellison, to his co-CEO, I don’t just want those dollars that you’ve committed to productions to be spent in America — I want them to be spent in Los Angeles,” the two-term councilmember said today at the Bloomberg Screentime conference, which is taking place in her Hollywood district. Raman said that though she was opposed to $111 billion merger of Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery, now that the deal has been approved she has no interest in “relitigating this into eternity.”

    As has been the case many times in the past, the home of Hollywood has some unlikely bedfellows when it comes to the bottom line. It is unknown whether Raman has directly reached out to Paramount brass since U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín signed off Tuesday on the antitrust settlement between the Ellison-run company and a dozen state attorneys general. Paramount reps did not respond to Deadline’s request for comment on any communication between the councilmember and the CEO.

    David Ellison

    Paramount CEO David Ellison

    Getty

    In full campaign mode, Raman emphasized during today’s panel interview that she will be a “relentless advocate” for uncapping the state’s current $750 million a year film and TV tax incentive program as a further move to get production back to California and L.A. With a room full of execs before her, the spouse of TV comedy scribe Vali Chandrasekaran also reiterated she would “ensure that we had a film office in the mayor’s office that was liaising with other jurisdictions, that was making it as simple to shoot here as possible, as low cost to shoot here as possible, and that work would be established almost immediately.”

    To that, with production significantly on the decline over the past six years and more than 50,000 jobs lost, Raman followed the headlines as Ellison and his newly minted co-CEO Ynon Kreiz prepare to meld the two iconic Hollywood companies.

    “If I get to be mayor, I want to work with you and ensure and fight as hard as I possibly can to make sure that every single one of those shoots are happening here in Los Angeles,” the candidate said, addressing Ellison and Kreiz directly in absentia. “And I will do everything in my power to make sure that happens.”

    Although Raman leads incumbent Mayor Karen Bass by double digits in many polls, the fact is one-third of voters in the City of Angels remain undecided just more than a month before the election. To that, the candidate has to win over a portion of those who voted for ex-The Hills regular Spencer Pratt in the three-way primary earlier this year — and she had a pitch.

    “To every voter who voted for Spencer Pratt in the primary who is disappointed that he’s not in this general election, I want to speak directly to you,” Raman said of the Donald Trump ally. “I want to speak directly to them, and to say that I share your frustration with City Hall, and I will work with every molecule of my being to ensure that this city is working for you.”

    Among his various post-primary endeavors, former Palisades resident Pratt has been instrumental, by all bipartisan accounts, in the crafting of federal film and TV tax incentive legislation — a bill Raman has said she also supports.

    Leaning into her own outsider status, even with years on the L.A. City Council, Raman added, again addressing Pratt voters: “The frustrations that Angelinos have with the direction of our city is warranted. We have, under this mayor’s leadership, we have moved in the wrong direction and and away from actually delivering the kinds of services that we were able to deliver just a few years ago because of fiscal mismanagement under her leadership.”

    “So, to those Pratt voters, I just want to say to you, I will do better for you,” she said.

  • Fox News Tops September And Q3 Ratings; MS NOW Sees Gains, CNN Shows Uptick In Some Categories

    Fox News Tops September And Q3 Ratings; MS NOW Sees Gains, CNN Shows Uptick In Some Categories

    Fox News again handily topped the September and third quarter ratings, although as its viewership was down versus the same periods in 2025.

    MS NOW saw gains in the most recent figures, and CNN also showed uptick in September and in certain dayparts for the quarter.

    In primetime in September, Fox News averaged 1.72 million viewers, down 32% from the same month in 2025. MS NOW averaged 839,000, up 3.6% from a year earlier. CNN posted 539,000, down 0.7% from 2025. In the 25-54 demo, Fox News averaged 156,000 viewers, down 44.3% from a year earlier, compared to 90,000 for CNN, up 3.4%, and 79,000 for MS NOW, up 16.2%.

    In total day in September, Fox News averaged 1.11 million, down 31.1% from 2025. MS NOW averaged 544,000, up 6.7%, and CNN posted 373,000, down 7%. In the 25-54 demo, Fox News averaged 106,000, down 40.8%, compared to CNN with 53,000, down 14.5%, and MS NOW with 52,000, up 15.6%.

    In the third quarter primetime, Fox News averaged 2.06 million viewers, down 17% from a year earlier, compared to 930,000 for MS NOW, up 16%, and 607,000 for CNN, up 12.8%. In the 25-54 demo, Fox News averaged 183,000 viewers, down 24.7%, compared to CNN with 101,000, up 16.1%, and MS NOW with 84,000, up 27.3%.

    In third quarter total day, Fox News averaged 1.32 million, down 15.8% versus 2025, compared to MS NOW with 592,000, up 20.3%, and CNN with 426,000, up 7.6%. In the 25-54 demo, Fox News averaged 120,000, down 24.5%, compared to CNN with 61,000, flat, and MS NOW with 56,000, up 36.6%.

    Fox News’ The Five was the top cable news show in September, averaging 2.79 million viewers, followed by Jesse Watters Primetime with 2.4 million, Gutfeld! with 2.12 million, Hannity with 2.06 million and Special Report with Bret Baier with 2.04 million.

    In the 25-54 demo, The Five was tops with 273,000, followed by Gutfeld! with 214,000, Jesse Watters Primetime with 212,000, Hannity with 204,000 and MS NOW’s The Rachel Maddow Show with 186,000.

    Each network touted certain aspects of the figures. Fox News said that they were on track to have its highest rated midterm year ever. MS NOW promoted double digit viewership increases.

    Among other networks, NewsNation said that its primetime viewership was up 12% in primetime in the third quarter and 8% in adults 25-54. NewsNation averaged 120,000 viewers in primetime during the third quarter, and 13,000 in the demo.

    Newsmax averaged 185,000 in primetime for the quarter and 9,000 in the demo.

    MS NOW’s top rated show in September was The Rachel Maddow Show, averaging 1.79 million viewers. CNN’s top show was NewsNight, averaging 610,000, and NewsNation’s was Cuomo, averaging 167,000. Newsmax’s top show was Rob Schmitt Tonight, averaging 305,000.

  • Was Trump’s ‘super intelligence’ order a ploy to profit off .si domain names?

    Was Trump’s ‘super intelligence’ order a ploy to profit off .si domain names?

    • A claim that U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order to change “artificial intelligence” to “super intelligence” so that he and his associates could profit from the sale of domain names with the top-level domain “.si” circulated in late September 2026 but remains unproven.
    • The rumor stems from a social media thread by independent journalist Adam Cochran, who claimed that a spike in Slovenian domain registrations in May and June 2026, prior to Trump’s announcement, indicated collusion. He suggested Trump may have tipped off associates about the coming change in order for them to “domain squat” — to buy a domain at low cost, then resell at a higher value to meet demand.
    • It was true that there was a spike in registration of Slovenian domain names in May and June, followed by a separate spike shortly before the executive order in September. However, Snopes could not independently verify claims that Trump or his associates financially benefited from the domain purchases, or that he told insiders about the “super intelligence” executive order ahead of time. 

    • Snopes reached out to Cochran asking him to share his evidence for independent review, as well as to Register.si, Slovenia’s domain registrar, to ask if there were any other explanations for the spikes in May and June. We will update this article if we get a response. We also reached out to the White House press office for comment and have not heard back as of this writing. 

    A claim that U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order changing the term “artificial intelligence” to “super intelligence” in order to profit from the sale of domain names with the top-level domain “.si” circulated in late September 2026.  

    People on social media platforms shared the rumor, with some claiming that an “investigation shows that in the past 60 days insiders bought thousands of .si domain names. They’ve profited hundreds of millions of dollars so far.”

    The “.si” domain is for the country of Slovenia — also the home country of first lady Melania Trump, a detail that appeared to help fuel the rumor — and is typically used for businesses operating from that country. 

    The rumor suggested that Trump tipped off associates so that they could purchase Slovenian domains, sit on them, and then resell at a high markup to companies or individuals looking to expand their web presence to the “.si” top-level domain, a practice called domain squatting.

    The claim circulated following Trump’s Sept. 29, 2026, signing of an executive order demanding that any reference to “artificial intelligence” be instead called “super intelligence” within the U.S. government’s executive branch.

    Trump and tech leaders also signed an accord in an effort to assuage fears over AI, which Snopes previously reported featured a misspelling of “United States.” Polls have shown that AI is increasingly unpopular and critics called the move an attempted “rebrand” of AI.

    Prior to the official documents, Trump had previously posted about “super intelligence” on his Truth Social social media page on Sept. 19.

    It was true that there was a spike in registration of Slovenian domain names months before the executive order, but Snopes could not independently verify claims that Trump or his associates either financially benefited from the domain purchases or knew about the “super intelligence” executive order ahead of time. 

    The claim originated with a thread on X by independent journalist Adam Cochran. 

    Cochran cited the Slovenian domain registry Register.si, which operates as part of the Academic and Research Network of Slovenia. The organization’s website says its mission is ensuring a “stable, secure, uninterrupted and reliable operation of .si in the global digital ecosystem.”

    Register.si’s website called the “.si” domain “an internationally recognized top-level domain that represents Slovenia and is the first choice of address on the Internet for all individuals and organizations related to Slovenia.”

    A post on Register.si’s website explained the organization does not directly register domains, but rather works “through approximately 90 domestic and foreign registrars.”

    The same post indicated that there had been a spike in registrations and specifically mentioned Trump’s “super intelligence” announcement as a possible cause, stating his social media post and resulting “discussion quickly attracted the attention of the public and the technology community, including speculation about the impact of the potential new abbreviation on the Slovenian national domain .si.”

    A graph depicting the number of daily “.si” domain registrations shared by Register.si indicated a jump from fewer than 1,000 registrations on Sept. 20 — one day after Trump posted about “super intelligence” on Truth Social — to over 4,000 on Sept. 23.

    (Register.si)

    More broadly, a monthly graph with a range of July 2025 to September 2026 showed a sharp rise from fewer than 2,500 registrations a month to more than 10,000 in September 2026. The graph also showed a spike in May and June 2026, both around 5,000. 

    (Register.si)

    The spikes in May and June appeared to be Cochran’s main evidence that connected the purchases to “Trump’s inner circle.” While it is possible Trump tipped off associates about the coming change and that they were the individuals who bought up .si domains, a theory is not proof. Snopes can only offer a rating after independently verifying primary evidence; therefore, we have left this claim unrated. 

    Further, “super intelligence” as a term predated Trump’s use of it. 

    We reached out to Cochran asking him to share his evidence for independent review, as well as Register.si to ask about any other explanations for the spike in May and June. We will update this article if we get a response. We also reached out to the White House press office for comment and have not heard back, as of this writing. 

    Domain squatting, also called cybersquatting, is nothing new. 

    Typically, it involves parties purchasing a domain that could be confused with an established brand or company, or even a common misspelling or typo of the company’s name. Once the new owner has control of the domain, they can then sell it to the company at a higher price than a typical fresh registration. 

    The World Intellectual Property Organization, a United Nations agency that aims to “protect and promote” intellectual property “across borders and acting as a forum for addressing cutting-edge IP issues,” reported its highest caseload of domain disputes to date in 2025 with over 6,200.

    Register.si’s website stated that their price “is the same for all registrars and amounts to EUR 10,” but that “the final price for domain holders depends on the policy of the individual registrar and Register.si has no influence on it,” according to a Google translation. 

    The organization said that speculation about potential earnings for the country of Slovenia because of the increased interest in their domain “have no real basis” and they advised “holders of trademarks, slogans, companies, … who do not yet have a domain under .si to register it as soon as possible.”

  • Hegseth named Musk, Gingrich to lead ‘Project Meridian.’ Here’s what we know about the plan

    Hegseth named Musk, Gingrich to lead ‘Project Meridian.’ Here’s what we know about the plan

    • On Sept. 30, 2026, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth delivered what he called a “State of the Force” address. During it, he announced the launch of “Project Meridian,” which he described as “an effort led by America’s best minds to study the future of warfare.”
    • Hegseth named Tesla and Space X CEO Elon Musk, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and Palmer Luckey, founder of defense technology company Anduril Industries, as heads of Project Meridian.
    • In a memorandum published the same day, Hegseth wrote, “Project Meridian’s primary function will be to map the trajectory of future warfare, identify critical capability gaps, and propose actionable solutions in furtherance of the identified goals in the 2026 National Security Science and Technology Strategy.”
    • Snopes will update this report if additional information surfaces about what, specifically, Project Meridian will do. We have reached out to the Department of Defense, Musk, Gingrich and Luckey asking for more details about what the project will entail and are waiting for responses.

    In late September 2026, a rumor spread online that Tesla and Space X CEO Elon Musk and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich had joined a new effort announced by the U.S. Department of Defense called “Project Meridian.” 

    Several social media posts made the claim, including on Reddit and X. One X post (archived) said Musk, Gingrich and Palmer Luckey, founder of defense technology company Anduril Industries, had been recruited to lead the project “to focus on developing future warfare and autonomous weapons systems for battlefields ‘from under the Earth to beyond the moon’”:

    The official X account of the DOD’s chief technology officer confirmed the story (archived):

    “From under the earth to beyond the moon, our warfighters will have technological superiority,” the post read. “PROJECT MERIDIAN: THE FUTURE OF WARFARE.”

    Here’s what we know so far about the initiative, its goals and the people involved:

    Hegseth’s announcement

    On Sept. 30, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth delivered what he called a “State of the Force” address — meant to evoke the State of the Union address, which the president delivers annually to Congress — and announced the launch of Project Meridian, which he described as “an effort led by America’s best minds to study the future of warfare.”

    Hegseth began to describe Project Meridian roughly midway through his address (at 34:45 in the video):

    Today we are leveraging a unique source of American advantage. One our adversaries do not have: our innovators, our senior leaders and our technologists — big thinkers who will forecast the creative solutions for tomorrow’s conflicts. That’s why today at my direction I am announcing Project Meridian, an effort led by America’s best minds to study the future of warfare. Under the leadership of the department’s chief technology officer, Emil Michael, Project Meridian will be co-led by three of our nations best minds. Elon Musk, Palmer Luckey and Newt Gingrich, all of whom are up in the audience with us today.

    Shortly after he named them, Musk, Luckey and Gingrich stood up to applause from the crowd. 

    Musk, Gingrich and Luckey

    Hegseth said the three men would lead a group of “subject-matter experts from across our nation’s unmatched innovation, academic and policy ecosystems.” The goal, he said, would be to develop “absolute technological superiority,” by focusing on, among other things, “autonomous warfare” — in other words, weapons and equipment capable of functioning autonomously.

    Musk was previously involved in President Donald Trump’s administration as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency, which spearheaded drastic spending cuts to government programs. (The Government Accountability Office said in August 2026 that DOGE incorrectly reported or failed to substantiate some of its purported savings.) Musk’s xAI technology has reportedly been used by U.S. forces in the Iran war.

    Gingrich has consistently defended the war with Iran (archived), which has proved unpopular with U.S. voters, according to polls.

    Luckey described himself as a “radical Zionist” during “The Shawn Ryan Show” podcast in February 2025, saying he defended Israel’s right to exist. Asked directly by Axios what he thought of the war in Iran, he declined to answer.

    Autonomous warfare

    During the address, Hegseth also announced the creation of a new combatant command: “Today, with Autonomous War Command — AutoWarCom — we institutionalize and we supercharge the era of SI, robotics, and autonomous systems. All in order to win,” Hegseth said. (“SI” refers to “super intelligence,” what the federal government began calling artificial intelligence in September 2026.)

    Hegseth appeared to present Project Meridian as the way to identify the technologies best suited to arm AutoWarCom. He said the group led by Musk, Gingrich and Luckey would render its first conclusions in 120 days.

    The same day, the Pentagon published a memorandum that further outlined the goal of Project Meridian. It read: 

    Project Meridian will leverage critical perspectives from outside the Pentagon, drawing upon a group of top technologists, innovators, business leaders, policy makers, and national security experts. Project Meridian’s primary function will be to map the trajectory of future warfare, identify critical capability gaps, and propose actionable solutions in furtherance of the identified goals in the 2026 National Security Science and Technology Strategy.

    For further reading, Snopes has investigated a number of rumors about Hegseth’s Defense Department, including a claim that the department spent $93 billion in one month.

  • Did Trump say Iowans are ‘really troubled people’?

    Did Trump say Iowans are ‘really troubled people’?

    Claim:

    A video posted online in late September 2026 authentically shows U.S. President Donald Trump saying Iowans are “really troubled people” at a White House event.

    Rating:

    Miscaptioned

    On Sept. 28, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump held an event at the White House to announce the planning of a new steel plant in Iowa. Joining him in the Oval Office for the event were several Iowa state leaders and officials.

    Afterward, some social media users claimed Trump insulted Iowans during the event. For example, an X post (archived) displayed a video clip apparently recorded at the event and asserted, “Trump claims the federal government can ‘supersede’ Iowa and calls Iowans ‘troubled people.’”

    In the clip, Trump can be heard saying this: “And we can supersede the state, right? If we can supersede the state, it’s good. Otherwise, it will never be good. They’re very — they’re really troubled people.”

    Users shared other posts claiming Trump called Iowans troubled people on Instagram (archived) and Threads (archived). Snopes readers searched the site and emailed us asking whether the claim was true.

    It was not true. While the video clip is real and unedited, it omits important context that proves Trump didn’t call Iowans “really troubled people.” Trump was actually referring to Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and other Democratic leaders in that state. 

    The remark came immediately after an exchange in which Trump asked how Walz was treating the opening of a new iron mine in Minnesota. Given that this context was omitted, we have rated the clip miscaptioned.

    Videos and transcripts of Trump’s remarks at the event were uploaded online by C-SPAN and Roll Call. The conversation that led to Trump making the “troubled people” comment begin at about the 6:20 mark in the C-SPAN video and 6:07 in Roll Call’s Vimeo video.

    At that time, John Jovanovic, the Trump-nominated chairman and president of the Export-Import Bank of the United States, begins describing the opening of an iron mine in Minnesota that is meant to supply the Iowa steel plant (emphasis ours):

    JOVANOVIC: Thank you, Mr. President. So, what we’re really talking about today is America’s economic security. And Mr. President, it’s your plan in action, but it all starts mining more in America. The mine you mentioned is the first mine opened in America in 50-plus years focused on iron ore. EXIM financed it, but most importantly, it’s found on the Iron Range in America, which for 145 years has been the most prolific iron ore deposit in the world. It helped build America. It helped win two world wars. You’re helping resurrect it, Mr. President, with this first iron ore mine. That is why this plant is possible, because we are creating one American supply chain. And what you see again here today, Mr. President, is private capital flowing in to rebuild America and to build America’s future, so we can assure that the warfighter of tomorrow in America is always well-equipped and that everyday Americans have what they need when they need it most. And this is what it’s going to take to continue to deliver the American dream, Mr. President, for another 250 years.

    TRUMP: And how is the governor treating you? Because I freed up the iron ore in that place, and I absolutely won the election, but they wouldn’t — they cheat like hell. But how is the governor treating you? Because I freed it up and then they closed it, and the people were devastated because it is the finest iron ore in the world, they say. So how is the governor and these other people that don’t — I mean, it’s one of the worst-run places I’ve ever seen. How are they doing?

    JOVANOVIC: You know, Mr. President, we were there only 10 days ago, actually, to initiate the mine. We set off 1.3 million pounds of explosives that put it into operation and that will be the iron ore that feeds this plant and to make steel in America the —

    TRUMP: And we can supersede the state, right?

    COMMERCE SECRETARY HOWARD LUTNICK: Yes.

    JOVANOVIC: [unintelligible, cut off by Trump]

    TRUMP: If we can supersede the state, it’s good. Otherwise, the state will never be good. They’re very — they’re really troubled people. Thank you very much; great job you’re doing, too, by the way. Secretary Lutnick, please.

    The mine Jovanovic referred to is owned by Mesabi Metallics in northern Minnesota, where part of the American Iron Range is located. Mesabi Metallics is the same company investing in the steel plant in Iowa.

    Local news reports on the fraught history of the mine suggest its struggles have largely been tied to the parent company of Mesabi Metallics, Essar. The India-based company first started work on the mine and an accompanying steel mill in 2007 before shuttering its plans for the mine in 2015 and filing for bankruptcy in 2016. Essar still owes Minnesota more than $22 million in infrastructure debt, according to Iowa news channel KWQC.

    As Jovanovic said, Trump administration officials were at the opening of the iron mine in Minnesota about 10 days earlier. If Trump’s concern was about opening the mine, he’d have no reason to call for the federal government to “supersede” Minnesota. According to Essar itself, Minnesota State Auditor Julie Blaha said in 2024, “After years of uncertainty, it’s encouraging to see Mesabi Metallics breathing new life into this major mining operation.”

    While the context makes it clear that Trump was referencing Walz and his administration in Minnesota, not Iowans, Snopes reached out to the White House to seek confirmation on whom exactly Trump believed to be “really troubled people.” We’ll update this story if and when we receive a response to our question.

    For further reading, Snopes recently investigated a claim asserting Trump’s renaming of “artificial intelligence” to “super intelligence” is a play to profit off of .SI domain names.

  • Is Florida the first state to bar welfare cash for ‘nonessential’ items?

    Is Florida the first state to bar welfare cash for ‘nonessential’ items?

    Claim:

    In August 2026, Florida became the first U.S. state to bar recipients of welfare cash assistance from spending it on tattoos, vaping products, theme park tickets and other “nonessential” items.

    Rating:

    Mixture

    What’s True

    The claim is correct in that Florida became the first state to implement item-specific restrictions for recipients of its Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program at the point of sale. However …

    What’s False

    … other states across the U.S. also block similar purchases through other means. So while the claim is technically correct, Florida is not the first state to block the purchase of certain kinds of items using government funds through other means.

    In September 2026, a claim circulated online that Florida had become the first U.S. state to bar recipients of temporary cash assistance from spending it on “nonessential” items such as tattoos, tobacco, drugs, pornography and more.

    For example, one popular Facebook post with more than 120,000 likes reads, in part (archived):

    The program, funded through the federal TANF [Temporary Assistance for Needy Families] program and delivered via EBT [electronic benefit transfer] cards, gives eligible families with children under 18 an average of about $250 a month for basic living costs. Under the amended plan, that money can no longer go toward tobacco and nicotine products, vaping devices, drugs or intoxicants, p*rnography, video games, theme park admission, entertainment subscriptions, tattoos and body piercings, spa and tanning services, or psychic and fortune-telling services.

    (Facebook user It’s A Guy Thing)

    In short, the claim is correct in that Florida has become the first state to implement item-specific restrictions for TANF recipients at the point of sale, but other states across the U.S. also block similar purchases through other means. So while the claim is technically correct, Florida is not the first state to block the purchase of certain kinds of items using government funds through other means.

    Some posts, such as the one above, do not specify the date that the change took place — potentially misleading people into believing the change occurred in September. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis actually first announced the move on Aug. 24, 2026 (archived). 

    In a news release published that same day, De Santis said (archived):

    Florida has become the first in the nation to set guardrails on our TANF State Plan to stop these taxpayer-funded benefits from being used to purchase inappropriate, luxury, and non-essential goods and services. Taxpayer-funded assistance should help families put food on the table, keep the lights on, purchase clothing, provide for their children and overcome barriers on the path toward independence. We will continue supporting Floridians who genuinely need assistance, while working to improve accountability and transparency so that these programs operate as intended.

    The full list of new prohibited products was outlined in the 2026-2028 Florida TANF State Plan as follows: 

    • Tobacco, Nicotine, Vaping and other associated products
    • Drugs, intoxicants, and related products
    • Pornography, sexually explicit materials, and adult-oriented goods or services
    • Entertainment goods, subscriptions, and services such as video games, entertainment tickets, theme parks, and subscriptions/memberships
    • Body art, jewelry and body piercings, cosmetic services and luxury items such as tattoos, spa services, and tanning
    • Psychic, fortune-telling and divination goods or services
    • Political contributions
    • Lottery tickets and entries, sports wagers and bets
    • Soda
    • Energy drinks
    • Candy
    • Ultra-processed prepared desserts

    Further down in De Santis’ announcement, it notes that the state already prohibits several kinds of items using welfare assistance:

    Florida already prohibits EBT card use or acceptance for alcohol purchases and transactions at adult entertainment establishments, pari-mutuel wagering facilities, slot machine facilities, commercial bingo establishments and casinos or gaming facilities. Florida’s EBT vendor blocks point-of-sale transactions at those businesses and ATM transactions at prohibited locations. The first-in-the-nation policy expands those controls to additional items and services at eligible retailers.

    Other states, such as Kansas and Virginia, also prohibit the purchase of items such as tattoos and tobacco products using TANF benefits, with violators potentially facing penalties after making such purchases.

    The difference between Florida and other states is that it amended its existing limits for purchases at certain locations (such as liquor stores or casinos) to include the use of temporary cash assistance for specific items at the point of sale (PDF page 69).

    Some items, including drugs such as recreational marijuana, are already criminalized in the state of Florida.

  • Execution of US woman Christa Pike fails after botched lethal injection

    Execution of US woman Christa Pike fails after botched lethal injection

    The high-profile execution of convicted murderer Christa Pike is in disarray after two lethal injections failed to kill her. Witnesses say prison officials administered the drugs but 40 minutes later Pike was still alive.

  • Trump admin will cut student loan eligibility for some degrees. How will they choose?

    Trump admin will cut student loan eligibility for some degrees. How will they choose?

    Claim:

    The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is cutting access to student loans for degrees that have low earning potential, including social work.

    Rating:

    True

    Context

    The new rule, first announced in April 2026, was finalized in June 2026 and will take effect in 2027. The Department of Education will begin denying loans for degrees that fail its “earnings test” in both 2027 and 2028 in time for the 2028-29 academic year.

    In September 2026. a rumor spread that the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump was planning to cut access to student loans for candidates pursuing degrees in programs with low earning prospects, including social work and English literature. 

    Public interest in the claim was apparently sparked by news reports that came out several weeks earlier in the Los Angeles Times, The New Republic and other media outlets. 

    Social media posts on Facebook and X amplified the claim online. On X, for example, one account said the Department of Education was “cutting off student loans” for degrees that “don’t pay off,” listing a series of examples (archived):

    The list read:

    Programs failing: 
    – Cosmetology 
    – Massage therapy / bodywork 
    – Culinary arts 
    – Medical / dental assisting 
    – Religious Studies 
    – Social work / mental health counseling 
    – Fine and studio arts 
    – Music 
    – Graphic design 
    – English literature 
    – Early childhood education

    In addition, several Snopes readers emailed, seeking to confirm whether the claim is true. It is.

    The so-called ‘earnings accountability’ rule

    In April, the Department of Education proposed a new rule tying the approval of student loans to the earning prospects of the students’ chosen disciplines. 

    On June 29, the department posted on its website a fact sheet detailing a new package of rules, including the one above. The document said (on Page 3) that the department would start calculating a new “earnings test” in 2027 for 2027 and 2028, and that resulting student loan denials would begin in 2028-29 for degrees that fail the earnings test twice.

    The fact sheet said the rule was designed to hold “all institutions, regardless of tax status or credential level, accountable for providing graduates with a financial return on their investment.” 

    Calling it the “Student Tuition and Transparency System (STATS) and Earnings Accountability” rule, the fact sheet said it would create “a new accountability framework that applies a commonsense earnings test across all sectors, institutions, and programs.” 

    A spokesperson for the department told Snopes:

    ED [the Department of Education], in coordination with the IRS [Internal Revenue Service], will run data for the first cohort of graduates in 2027. If a program fails to show at least a modest financial return on investment for its graduates in two out of three consecutive award years, it will lose eligibility to participate in the federal Direct Loan program. 

    Will some students be banned from taking out loans? 

    On Sept. 27, The New Republic posted on X to say, “Trump is banning students majoring in degrees that don’t make enough money from taking out college loans.”

    In its Sept. 28 reply, the Department of Education sought to deny claims that it was “banning” certain degree programs, but confirmed it would start cutting access to student loans for those that result in low earnings for the borrower. The post said “Federal student loans are not a welfare program for failing college programs” (archived):

    On Page 3, the fact sheet explained how the new eligibility rule would work to cut student loans for degrees with low-earning prospects:

    Loss of Federal Direct Loan Program Eligibility

    The final rule requires that programs that fail the earnings test in two out of three consecutive years lose eligibility to participate in the Direct Loan program. At that time, such programs are classified as “low-earning outcome programs”.

    In other words, the Department of Education will run the earnings test in 2027 and 2028. Degrees that fail the test will result in student loan denials for their candidates.

    The notice of proposed rulemaking on the website of the Federal Register, published on April 20, 2026, outlined some degrees that may be most affected by the new “accountability” rules (emphasis ours):

    Mental and Social Health & Allied Professions master’s degree programs (CIP=51.15), Teacher Education and Professional Development associate’s degree programs (CIP=13.12), and Drama/Theater Arts bachelor’s degree programs (CIPs=50.05, 50.07, and 50.09) are anticipated to be most impacted by the proposed regulations. These programs are often between 10 and 20 times more likely to fail the accountability framework under the proposed regulation relative to the current regulations. These higher fail rates are driven by the fact that a large share of these programs are offered at public and non-profit institutions, which would no longer be exempt from the accountability framework under the proposed rule.

    The final rule notice in the Federal Register provided an updated estimate of which degrees are likely to fail the earnings test and be denied student loans. Those include humanities and liberal arts, education, health-related degrees, but also culinary and personal services, social and behavioral sciences, and more. It’s unclear if all the specific professions listed in the X post at the top of this article would fall under the broad categories listed in the final rule.

    The final rule also defined “earnings” to clarify which data the Department of Education would use from the IRS in its earning test calculations: “… wages, income as reported to the Internal Revenue Service, and other earned income, including from self-employment.”

    For further reading, Snopes examined the claim that the Department of Education would stop counting certain programs, including nursing, as “professional degrees.”