Category: News

  • Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Leading in polls in the Los Angeles mayor’s race, Nithya Raman went on a charm offensive Thursday with the film and TV industry, and Paramount‘s CEO David Ellison in particular.

    “To David Ellison, to his co-CEO, I don’t just want those dollars that you’ve committed to productions to be spent in America — I want them to be spent in Los Angeles,” the two-term councilmember said today at the Bloomberg Screentime conference, which is taking place in her Hollywood district. Raman said that though she was opposed to $111 billion merger of Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery, now that the deal has been approved she has no interest in “relitigating this into eternity.”

    As has been the case many times in the past, the home of Hollywood has some unlikely bedfellows when it comes to the bottom line. It is unknown whether Raman has directly reached out to Paramount brass since U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín signed off Tuesday on the antitrust settlement between the Ellison-run company and a dozen state attorneys general. Paramount reps did not respond to Deadline’s request for comment on any communication between the councilmember and the CEO.

    David Ellison

    Paramount CEO David Ellison

    Getty

    In full campaign mode, Raman emphasized during today’s panel interview that she will be a “relentless advocate” for uncapping the state’s current $750 million a year film and TV tax incentive program as a further move to get production back to California and L.A. With a room full of execs before her, the spouse of TV comedy scribe Vali Chandrasekaran also reiterated she would “ensure that we had a film office in the mayor’s office that was liaising with other jurisdictions, that was making it as simple to shoot here as possible, as low cost to shoot here as possible, and that work would be established almost immediately.”

    To that, with production significantly on the decline over the past six years and more than 50,000 jobs lost, Raman followed the headlines as Ellison and his newly minted co-CEO Ynon Kreiz prepare to meld the two iconic Hollywood companies.

    “If I get to be mayor, I want to work with you and ensure and fight as hard as I possibly can to make sure that every single one of those shoots are happening here in Los Angeles,” the candidate said, addressing Ellison and Kreiz directly in absentia. “And I will do everything in my power to make sure that happens.”

    Although Raman leads incumbent Mayor Karen Bass by double digits in many polls, the fact is one-third of voters in the City of Angels remain undecided just more than a month before the election. To that, the candidate has to win over a portion of those who voted for ex-The Hills regular Spencer Pratt in the three-way primary earlier this year — and she had a pitch.

    “To every voter who voted for Spencer Pratt in the primary who is disappointed that he’s not in this general election, I want to speak directly to you,” Raman said of the Donald Trump ally. “I want to speak directly to them, and to say that I share your frustration with City Hall, and I will work with every molecule of my being to ensure that this city is working for you.”

    Among his various post-primary endeavors, former Palisades resident Pratt has been instrumental, by all bipartisan accounts, in the crafting of federal film and TV tax incentive legislation — a bill Raman has said she also supports.

    Leaning into her own outsider status, even with years on the L.A. City Council, Raman added, again addressing Pratt voters: “The frustrations that Angelinos have with the direction of our city is warranted. We have, under this mayor’s leadership, we have moved in the wrong direction and and away from actually delivering the kinds of services that we were able to deliver just a few years ago because of fiscal mismanagement under her leadership.”

    “So, to those Pratt voters, I just want to say to you, I will do better for you,” she said.

  • Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Leading in polls in the Los Angeles mayor’s race, Nithya Raman went on a charm offensive Thursday with the film and TV industry, and Paramount‘s CEO David Ellison in particular.

    “To David Ellison, to his co-CEO, I don’t just want those dollars that you’ve committed to productions to be spent in America — I want them to be spent in Los Angeles,” the two-term councilmember said today at the Bloomberg Screentime conference, which is taking place in her Hollywood district. Raman said that though she was opposed to $111 billion merger of Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery, now that the deal has been approved she has no interest in “relitigating this into eternity.”

    As has been the case many times in the past, the home of Hollywood has some unlikely bedfellows when it comes to the bottom line. It is unknown whether Raman has directly reached out to Paramount brass since U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín signed off Tuesday on the antitrust settlement between the Ellison-run company and a dozen state attorneys general. Paramount reps did not respond to Deadline’s request for comment on any communication between the councilmember and the CEO.

    David Ellison

    Paramount CEO David Ellison

    Getty

    In full campaign mode, Raman emphasized during today’s panel interview that she will be a “relentless advocate” for uncapping the state’s current $750 million a year film and TV tax incentive program as a further move to get production back to California and L.A. With a room full of execs before her, the spouse of TV comedy scribe Vali Chandrasekaran also reiterated she would “ensure that we had a film office in the mayor’s office that was liaising with other jurisdictions, that was making it as simple to shoot here as possible, as low cost to shoot here as possible, and that work would be established almost immediately.”

    To that, with production significantly on the decline over the past six years and more than 50,000 jobs lost, Raman followed the headlines as Ellison and his newly minted co-CEO Ynon Kreiz prepare to meld the two iconic Hollywood companies.

    “If I get to be mayor, I want to work with you and ensure and fight as hard as I possibly can to make sure that every single one of those shoots are happening here in Los Angeles,” the candidate said, addressing Ellison and Kreiz directly in absentia. “And I will do everything in my power to make sure that happens.”

    Although Raman leads incumbent Mayor Karen Bass by double digits in many polls, the fact is one-third of voters in the City of Angels remain undecided just more than a month before the election. To that, the candidate has to win over a portion of those who voted for ex-The Hills regular Spencer Pratt in the three-way primary earlier this year — and she had a pitch.

    “To every voter who voted for Spencer Pratt in the primary who is disappointed that he’s not in this general election, I want to speak directly to you,” Raman said of the Donald Trump ally. “I want to speak directly to them, and to say that I share your frustration with City Hall, and I will work with every molecule of my being to ensure that this city is working for you.”

    Among his various post-primary endeavors, former Palisades resident Pratt has been instrumental, by all bipartisan accounts, in the crafting of federal film and TV tax incentive legislation — a bill Raman has said she also supports.

    Leaning into her own outsider status, even with years on the L.A. City Council, Raman added, again addressing Pratt voters: “The frustrations that Angelinos have with the direction of our city is warranted. We have, under this mayor’s leadership, we have moved in the wrong direction and and away from actually delivering the kinds of services that we were able to deliver just a few years ago because of fiscal mismanagement under her leadership.”

    “So, to those Pratt voters, I just want to say to you, I will do better for you,” she said.

  • Renee Good’s family sues Trump administration over fatal ICE shooting

    Renee Good’s family sues Trump administration over fatal ICE shooting

    Lawsuits accuse Trump officials of recklessness and civil rights violations in Renee Good’s fatal Minneapolis shooting.

    The family of Renee Good, one of two US citizens fatally shot by federal immigration agents in the state of Minnesota, has sued the government over her killing during a sweeping immigrant deportation blitz in January.

    The two lawsuits – filed on Thursday by Good’s partner, Becca Good, and Renee’s brother, Brent Ganger – say officials from US President Donald Trump’s administration were reckless and violated the civil rights of Good and others in Minneapolis. The lawsuits are demanding a jury trial and financial damages.

    The lawsuits are the first major civil actions taken against the Trump administration over its unprecedented deportation crackdowns in Minneapolis last winter, dubbed Operation Metro Surge.

    The first lawsuit seeks damages for Good’s wrongful death under Minnesota law, citing claims of assault, battery, false imprisonment, negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

    The second lawsuit alleges a civil rights conspiracy among numerous defendants including the immigration officer and shooter Jonathon Ross, who was named alongside high-ranking Trump administration officials, including White House Deputy Policy Chief Stephen Miller, former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, former Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino and Trump’s longtime campaign adviser, Corey Lewandowski.

    Good, a mother of three, was shot and killed in her car by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent in south Minneapolis when she and her wife joined one of the city’s daily demonstrations against masked and armed federal agents deployed to the city to arrest migrants for deportation.

    Widespread cellphone footage taken by eyewitnesses captured the moment in which Good was killed, after agent Ross fired into the windshield, shooting her in the head, arm and torso.

    Federal officials at the time said the officer acted in self-defence and that Good had engaged in “an act of domestic terrorism”.

    In a statement posted on Truth Social at the time, Trump defended the deadly ICE shooting, saying that the reason those “incidents” were happening was that “the Radical Left is threatening, assaulting, and targeting our Law Enforcement Officers and ICE Agents on a daily basis”.

    Days after the shooting, officials from the US Department of Justice, including then-Deputy Attorney Todd Blanche, blocked federal prosecutors from pursuing a criminal civil rights case against the agents involved in her killing, which prompted at least half a dozen of those prosecutors to resign in protest.

    Minnesota sued the Trump administration in March to gain access to the evidence it gathered at the shooting scenes, but investigations stalled after the Justice Department halted its routine cooperation and evidence-sharing with the Minneapolis Police Department.

    None of the agents involved in Good’s killing has faced any charges.

  • Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Leading in polls in the Los Angeles mayor’s race, Nithya Raman went on a charm offensive Thursday with the film and TV industry, and Paramount‘s CEO David Ellison in particular.

    “To David Ellison, to his co-CEO, I don’t just want those dollars that you’ve committed to productions to be spent in America — I want them to be spent in Los Angeles,” the two-term councilmember said today at the Bloomberg Screentime conference, which is taking place in her Hollywood district. Raman said that though she was opposed to $111 billion merger of Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery, now that the deal has been approved she has no interest in “relitigating this into eternity.”

    As has been the case many times in the past, the home of Hollywood has some unlikely bedfellows when it comes to the bottom line. It is unknown whether Raman has directly reached out to Paramount brass since U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín signed off Tuesday on the antitrust settlement between the Ellison-run company and a dozen state attorneys general. Paramount reps did not respond to Deadline’s request for comment on any communication between the councilmember and the CEO.

    David Ellison

    Paramount CEO David Ellison

    Getty

    In full campaign mode, Raman emphasized during today’s panel interview that she will be a “relentless advocate” for uncapping the state’s current $750 million a year film and TV tax incentive program as a further move to get production back to California and L.A. With a room full of execs before her, the spouse of TV comedy scribe Vali Chandrasekaran also reiterated she would “ensure that we had a film office in the mayor’s office that was liaising with other jurisdictions, that was making it as simple to shoot here as possible, as low cost to shoot here as possible, and that work would be established almost immediately.”

    To that, with production significantly on the decline over the past six years and more than 50,000 jobs lost, Raman followed the headlines as Ellison and his newly minted co-CEO Ynon Kreiz prepare to meld the two iconic Hollywood companies.

    “If I get to be mayor, I want to work with you and ensure and fight as hard as I possibly can to make sure that every single one of those shoots are happening here in Los Angeles,” the candidate said, addressing Ellison and Kreiz directly in absentia. “And I will do everything in my power to make sure that happens.”

    Although Raman leads incumbent Mayor Karen Bass by double digits in many polls, the fact is one-third of voters in the City of Angels remain undecided just more than a month before the election. To that, the candidate has to win over a portion of those who voted for ex-The Hills regular Spencer Pratt in the three-way primary earlier this year — and she had a pitch.

    “To every voter who voted for Spencer Pratt in the primary who is disappointed that he’s not in this general election, I want to speak directly to you,” Raman said of the Donald Trump ally. “I want to speak directly to them, and to say that I share your frustration with City Hall, and I will work with every molecule of my being to ensure that this city is working for you.”

    Among his various post-primary endeavors, former Palisades resident Pratt has been instrumental, by all bipartisan accounts, in the crafting of federal film and TV tax incentive legislation — a bill Raman has said she also supports.

    Leaning into her own outsider status, even with years on the L.A. City Council, Raman added, again addressing Pratt voters: “The frustrations that Angelinos have with the direction of our city is warranted. We have, under this mayor’s leadership, we have moved in the wrong direction and and away from actually delivering the kinds of services that we were able to deliver just a few years ago because of fiscal mismanagement under her leadership.”

    “So, to those Pratt voters, I just want to say to you, I will do better for you,” she said.

  • Despite praise and White House visits, Trump avoids endorsing Netanyahu

    Despite praise and White House visits, Trump avoids endorsing Netanyahu

    In a Time interview, Trump avoids directly endorsing Netanyahu but defends him over reports of warnings before October 7 attacks.

    United States President Donald Trump has avoided directly endorsing Benjamin Netanyahu in an interview ahead of Israel’s upcoming elections, despite repeatedly heaping praise – and White House visits – on the Israeli prime minister.

    Trump thrice avoided making an endorsement in an interview with Time magazine published on Thursday, instead pivoting to his own popularity in Israel and actions in support of Israel’s government.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    The US president was initially asked if the “Israeli people should give Netanyahu another term?”

    “Well, I can only say that I’m not involved in politics any more, except that we’re popular,” Trump said, claiming “99 percent” popularity in Israel.

    When pressed a second time on whether Netanyahu should have another term, Trump pointed to Washington’s continued security support for Israel and his decision to move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem during his first term.

    The interviewer responded: “It seems like you’re doing a lot of work for him. Should he have another term?”

    Trump replied: “No, my primary thing – I do want to help them defend Israel. My thing that I mention all the time is Iran cannot have a nuclear power because they are crazy and you can’t let crazy people have nuclear weapons.”

    Trump has repeatedly hailed his relationship with Netanyahu throughout his second term, even as government officials have leaked accounts of private discord between the two leaders.

    Trump has met with Netanyahu at least seven times since January 2025, more than any other leader, and has publicly pushed for a pardon in the Israeli leader’s ongoing corruption trial.

    Still, the latest statements come as Trump and his Republican Party have contended with growing discontent with his administration’s policy towards Israel, particularly amid perceptions that the Israeli government influenced Trump to launch the US-Israel war against Iran in February.

    The conflict, which has driven up petrol prices in the US, has become a key vulnerability ahead of the US midterm elections in November, which will determine whether Democrats or Republicans control the US Senate and House of Representatives for Trump’s final two years in office.

    Nevertheless, Trump hosted Netanyahu most recently at the White House in July, flouting concerns over Israeli obstructions to ending the conflict, as well as to achieving a more lasting peace in Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza.

    Speaking to Time magazine, Trump defended the war with Iran, saying he may still seek to “annihilate” Iran and could resume bombing after the midterm vote.

    Trump also came to Netanyahu’s defence, batting away reports that Egypt and the United Arab Emirates had warned Netanyahu of the impending Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel on October 7, 2023.

    “I think if he would have known, he would have done something about it,” he said.

    He later acknowledged that “people have written off Bibi many, many times, just like they’ve written off me many, many times”, using Netanyahu’s nickname.

    “I wouldn’t underestimate Bibi,” he added.

    Trump was also asked if US security support would change if Gadi Eisenkot, whose opposition bloc has been leading in  Israeli polls, were to win the October 27 vote.

    He replied: “Well, I don’t know. I don’t hear bad things about him.”

  • Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Leading in polls in the Los Angeles mayor’s race, Nithya Raman went on a charm offensive Thursday with the film and TV industry, and Paramount‘s CEO David Ellison in particular.

    “To David Ellison, to his co-CEO, I don’t just want those dollars that you’ve committed to productions to be spent in America — I want them to be spent in Los Angeles,” the two-term councilmember said today at the Bloomberg Screentime conference, which is taking place in her Hollywood district. Raman said that though she was opposed to $111 billion merger of Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery, now that the deal has been approved she has no interest in “relitigating this into eternity.”

    As has been the case many times in the past, the home of Hollywood has some unlikely bedfellows when it comes to the bottom line. It is unknown whether Raman has directly reached out to Paramount brass since U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín signed off Tuesday on the antitrust settlement between the Ellison-run company and a dozen state attorneys general. Paramount reps did not respond to Deadline’s request for comment on any communication between the councilmember and the CEO.

    David Ellison

    Paramount CEO David Ellison

    Getty

    In full campaign mode, Raman emphasized during today’s panel interview that she will be a “relentless advocate” for uncapping the state’s current $750 million a year film and TV tax incentive program as a further move to get production back to California and L.A. With a room full of execs before her, the spouse of TV comedy scribe Vali Chandrasekaran also reiterated she would “ensure that we had a film office in the mayor’s office that was liaising with other jurisdictions, that was making it as simple to shoot here as possible, as low cost to shoot here as possible, and that work would be established almost immediately.”

    To that, with production significantly on the decline over the past six years and more than 50,000 jobs lost, Raman followed the headlines as Ellison and his newly minted co-CEO Ynon Kreiz prepare to meld the two iconic Hollywood companies.

    “If I get to be mayor, I want to work with you and ensure and fight as hard as I possibly can to make sure that every single one of those shoots are happening here in Los Angeles,” the candidate said, addressing Ellison and Kreiz directly in absentia. “And I will do everything in my power to make sure that happens.”

    Although Raman leads incumbent Mayor Karen Bass by double digits in many polls, the fact is one-third of voters in the City of Angels remain undecided just more than a month before the election. To that, the candidate has to win over a portion of those who voted for ex-The Hills regular Spencer Pratt in the three-way primary earlier this year — and she had a pitch.

    “To every voter who voted for Spencer Pratt in the primary who is disappointed that he’s not in this general election, I want to speak directly to you,” Raman said of the Donald Trump ally. “I want to speak directly to them, and to say that I share your frustration with City Hall, and I will work with every molecule of my being to ensure that this city is working for you.”

    Among his various post-primary endeavors, former Palisades resident Pratt has been instrumental, by all bipartisan accounts, in the crafting of federal film and TV tax incentive legislation — a bill Raman has said she also supports.

    Leaning into her own outsider status, even with years on the L.A. City Council, Raman added, again addressing Pratt voters: “The frustrations that Angelinos have with the direction of our city is warranted. We have, under this mayor’s leadership, we have moved in the wrong direction and and away from actually delivering the kinds of services that we were able to deliver just a few years ago because of fiscal mismanagement under her leadership.”

    “So, to those Pratt voters, I just want to say to you, I will do better for you,” she said.

  • Chinese hackers impersonated AI experts to target US policy minds

    Chinese hackers impersonated AI experts to target US policy minds

    TA419 hackers used deceptive tactics, impersonating real figures like a former White House AI official

    Chinese hackers have been impersonating artificial intelligence (AI) experts in the United States, including a former government official, according to a new report from cybersecurity firm Proofpoint.

    The report, released on Thursday, found that in July, a China-aligned hacking group called TA419 targeted a slate of US policy experts by impersonating prominent figures, including Lynne Edwards Parker, the former principal deputy director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 4 itemsend of list

    The hackers, who had been operating since April 2025, first sent otherwise harmless-looking emails intended to engage a target, such as requests to join an “AI Policy Advisory Committee”, and, once they responded, the target would be sent to a fake login page designed to steal their credentials.

    The targets included policy experts at think tanks, defence contractors, universities and law firms in both the US and Japan.

    The report used a technique that creates a fake browser pop-up window inside a legitimate webpage that mimics an authentic-looking sign-in prompt to deceive victims and make it harder for them to realise they are handing over their information to hackers.

    Proofpoint did not specifically name the targets hacked, but the Reuters news agency was able to confirm at least one of them as Alex Engler, a former White House official who now heads the Penn Center on Media, Technology, and Democracy.

    Engler told Reuters that he got one of the emails, but after checking with industry colleagues, he discovered that he had received the email from an impersonator.

    In February, the same group was behind the impersonation of a “prominent” Anthropic employee in efforts to target AI policy experts. The cybersecurity firm behind the report believes that the group will continue to target think tanks and other policy experts and will continue to use the identity of real-world experts to do it.

    Parker did not respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment.

  • Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Leading in polls in the Los Angeles mayor’s race, Nithya Raman went on a charm offensive Thursday with the film and TV industry, and Paramount‘s CEO David Ellison in particular.

    “To David Ellison, to his co-CEO, I don’t just want those dollars that you’ve committed to productions to be spent in America — I want them to be spent in Los Angeles,” the two-term councilmember said today at the Bloomberg Screentime conference, which is taking place in her Hollywood district. Raman said that though she was opposed to $111 billion merger of Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery, now that the deal has been approved she has no interest in “relitigating this into eternity.”

    As has been the case many times in the past, the home of Hollywood has some unlikely bedfellows when it comes to the bottom line. It is unknown whether Raman has directly reached out to Paramount brass since U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín signed off Tuesday on the antitrust settlement between the Ellison-run company and a dozen state attorneys general. Paramount reps did not respond to Deadline’s request for comment on any communication between the councilmember and the CEO.

    David Ellison

    Paramount CEO David Ellison

    Getty

    In full campaign mode, Raman emphasized during today’s panel interview that she will be a “relentless advocate” for uncapping the state’s current $750 million a year film and TV tax incentive program as a further move to get production back to California and L.A. With a room full of execs before her, the spouse of TV comedy scribe Vali Chandrasekaran also reiterated she would “ensure that we had a film office in the mayor’s office that was liaising with other jurisdictions, that was making it as simple to shoot here as possible, as low cost to shoot here as possible, and that work would be established almost immediately.”

    To that, with production significantly on the decline over the past six years and more than 50,000 jobs lost, Raman followed the headlines as Ellison and his newly minted co-CEO Ynon Kreiz prepare to meld the two iconic Hollywood companies.

    “If I get to be mayor, I want to work with you and ensure and fight as hard as I possibly can to make sure that every single one of those shoots are happening here in Los Angeles,” the candidate said, addressing Ellison and Kreiz directly in absentia. “And I will do everything in my power to make sure that happens.”

    Although Raman leads incumbent Mayor Karen Bass by double digits in many polls, the fact is one-third of voters in the City of Angels remain undecided just more than a month before the election. To that, the candidate has to win over a portion of those who voted for ex-The Hills regular Spencer Pratt in the three-way primary earlier this year — and she had a pitch.

    “To every voter who voted for Spencer Pratt in the primary who is disappointed that he’s not in this general election, I want to speak directly to you,” Raman said of the Donald Trump ally. “I want to speak directly to them, and to say that I share your frustration with City Hall, and I will work with every molecule of my being to ensure that this city is working for you.”

    Among his various post-primary endeavors, former Palisades resident Pratt has been instrumental, by all bipartisan accounts, in the crafting of federal film and TV tax incentive legislation — a bill Raman has said she also supports.

    Leaning into her own outsider status, even with years on the L.A. City Council, Raman added, again addressing Pratt voters: “The frustrations that Angelinos have with the direction of our city is warranted. We have, under this mayor’s leadership, we have moved in the wrong direction and and away from actually delivering the kinds of services that we were able to deliver just a few years ago because of fiscal mismanagement under her leadership.”

    “So, to those Pratt voters, I just want to say to you, I will do better for you,” she said.

  • Iraq’s Kurdish forces look to a new era after US withdrawal

    Iraq’s Kurdish forces are entering a new era following the withdrawal of US-led international forces that had been in the country to fight ISIL (ISIS).

    On Wednesday, the United States announced the formal end of Operation Inherent Resolve, its name for the 12-year-long campaign to defeat ISIL, and the completion of the withdrawal of its military forces from Iraq.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    Other partners in the war against the armed group also withdrew from Iraq, in accordance with a September 30 deadline set by Washington and Baghdad two years prior.

    For years, Iraq’s Kurdish forces – known as the Peshmerga – have relied on close military support from coalition forces, and the US in particular, to safeguard their autonomy and defend against ISIL.

    Their withdrawal has posed new political and security challenges for Iraq. Where does the Peshmerga stand today?

    The challenge of unification

    Days before the coalition’s withdrawal, on September 21, the Erbil-based Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) – which presides over Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan region – announced that it had finally merged Kurdish armed factions into a unified fighting force.

    In his speech at the ceremony marking the event, KRG President Nechirvan Barzani characterised it as a major national step towards consolidating the region’s institutions.

    “Kurdistan needs one force, one ministry, and one command,” he said. “The Peshmerga must be a national force, free from party interference and disputes. Today, we take a major step towards achieving this goal.”

    Barzani announced that the forces affiliated with his Kurdish Democratic Party (KDP) and its historic rival Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) were now under one structure. The KDP and PUK represent the two dominant Kurdish Iraqi factions.

    Zeidon Alkinani, a Middle East political analyst and founding director of the Doha-based Arab Perspectives Institute, told Al Jazeera that the unification would help stabilise Iraq.

    “Iraq’s most damaging rivalries have been within communities, intra-Shia and intra-Kurdish, not between them,” he said.

    He says reducing the role of the Erbil-based KDP and the Sulaymaniyah-based PUK party structures within the Peshmerga “strengthens Iraq’s stability and gives Erbil firmer legal footing with Baghdad”.

    However, the work is far from finished. Barzani, in his speech, warned that the unification marked the start of a phase that “may be even more difficult” than past Kurdish struggles, requiring the Peshmerga to stand above party loyalties.

    “The test is whether [unification] survives, given the persistence of two geographically distinct commands”, Alkinani says.

    Retired Lieutenant General Jabbar al-Yawar, former secretary general of the Ministry of Peshmerga in the KRG, told Al Jazeera that these parties were embroiled in a number of political disputes, including governance of Kurdistan and relations with Baghdad.

    These disputes, he says, could extend to military institutions if the forces remain tied to political parties.

    Kurdistan Region President Nechirvan Barzani [File:Azad Lashkari/Reuters]
    Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan region President Nechirvan Barzani [File:Azad Lashkari/Reuters]

    Readiness

    On the ground, the Ministry of Peshmerga insists that its forces are ready for the new era.

    Spokesperson Major General Othman Mohammed told Al Jazeera that the Peshmerga “has always been on full alert,” touting its role in repelling the ISIL in 2014 despite having limited means.

    He pointed to the relationship between the Peshmerga and Iraq’s other security forces, noting that commanders from both sides enjoyed very good cooperation and coordination.

    This coordination has become more important now that the international coalition has ended its mission, with Iraqis now relying on their own capabilities to detect and stop ISIL activity.

    Kurdish Peshmerga fighters take position on the Qarachogh Mountain in the Makhmur district, about 60 kilometres south of Erbil, capital of Iraq's autonomous northern Kurdish region, on September 30, 2026.
    Kurdish Peshmerga fighters take position on the Qarachogh mountain in the Makhmur district, about 60 kilometres (37 miles) south of Erbil, on September 30, 2026 [Safin Hamid/AFP]

    Despite this readiness, Mohammed Salih, a non-resident senior fellow at the US-based Foreign Policy Research Institute and an expert on Iraqi and regional affairs, says there is “considerable uncertainty and concern among Kurds surrounding the US withdrawal”.

    Many are asking whether the departure of US troops means the end of Washington’s commitment to Kurdish security, he told Al Jazeera, given that the US has been “a key security guarantor for the Kurdistan region for the past three decades”.

    Importantly, the US took with it key air defence systems when it withdrew, creating serious concern for Erbil, which has come under several drone and missile attacks since the start of the US war on Iran.

    Balanced relations

    Erbil has signalled its intention to continue cooperating with Baghdad as before, under Iraq’s federalist framework.

    The day after coalition forces withdrew, KDP leader and former KRG President Masoud Barzani touted “very strong coordination with the Iraqi federal government to confront any kind of threat or danger, whether it comes under the name of ISIS or any other name”.

    In Baghdad, he backed the federal government’s efforts to fight corruption, disarm Iran-aligned forces and settle outstanding disputes with Erbil under the constitution.

    Iraqi federalism and unity “depend on communication, coordination and respect for the rule of law among political parties, not on foreign troops”, Alkinani of the Arab Perspectives Institute said, in relation to the coalition withdrawal.

    Baghdad faced a dilemma when Washington demanded it disarm Iran-aligned Iraqi armed groups. The armed groups refused, pointing to the US presence in Iraq even as it waged war on Iran.

    The withdrawal may help the cause of federalism by removing this justification, he said, “but only if Iraqis replace it with dialogue and law rather than force”.

    Supporters of Iran-aligned armed factions gather for a rally celebrating the withdrawal of forces of the US-led coalition against the Islamic State from Iraq, in Baghdad on September 30, 2026.
    Supporters of Iran-aligned armed factions gather for a rally celebrating the withdrawal of forces of the US-led coalition against ISIL from Iraq, in Baghdad on September 30, 2026 [Ahmad Al-Rubaye/AFP]
  • Christa Pike execution fails: What next when a lethal injection is botched?

    Christa Pike execution fails: What next when a lethal injection is botched?

    Two doses of a lethal injection drug have failed to kill Christa Gail Pike, a 50-year-old woman who was due to be executed on Wednesday. Pike was taken to hospital after it was found that her heart was still beating following the procedure.

    Pike would have been the first woman in more than 200 years to be put to death in Tennessee and was the only woman on the state’s death row. Her attempted execution with doses of the sedative pentobarbital went ahead despite a last-minute stay by a federal appeals court on Wednesday, which was overturned just an hour before her execution by the Supreme Court.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    Human rights experts said the botched execution illustrates why the death penalty is inhumane and should be abolished.

    Clive Stafford Smith, a human rights lawyer who has represented many American death row inmates as well as detainees held at the notorious Guantanamo Bay detention centre, told Al Jazeera: “I’ve been in the execution chamber with six of my clients and it’s never the clinical process they’d have you believe. And it’s always a desperate midnight struggle to stop it.”

    He added: “In the end, you have to question whether this makes the world a better, more civilised place. Why, indeed, do we kill people to prove that killing people is wrong?”

    Ahead of the planned execution, Morris Tidball-Binz, the UN special rapporteur on arbitrary executions, told the UK’s Times newspaper: “If executed, Christa Pike would be a victim of torture to death. This will be a gross violation of human rights.”

    Here’s what we know about what happens when an execution goes wrong.

    What is the case against Pike?

    Pike was found guilty of the murder of another young woman she had viewed as a romantic rival, when she was aged 18, more than 30 years ago.

    In January 1995, Pike, her 17-year-old boyfriend Tadaryl Shipp and 18-year-old Shadolla Peterson lured Colleen Slemmer, 19, into a wooded area and tortured and killed her. All four were students at a Job Corps vocational centre in Knoxville.

    The case attracted huge public interest, especially after it was revealed that the attackers had carved a pentagram into Slemmer’s chest, which Shipp later admitted to doing. Pike, who delivered the killing blow to the victim’s head, smashing her skull, kept a piece of Slemmer’s skull afterwards.

    Pike and Shipp confessed and were convicted of first-degree murder in 1996. Pike was sentenced to death; Shipp, who was 17 at the time and therefore ineligible for the death penalty, received life with the possibility of parole.

    Her case is highly unusual in that she is a woman and was a teenager when she carried out the murder. Other death row inmates who were convicted at the age of 18 – all men – have had their sentences commuted to life in prison without parole.

    “Christa is a 50-year-old remorseful woman who understands her actions,” her lawyers wrote. They also argued that Pike had been the victim of appalling childhood abuse – including two rapes when she was aged 11 and 17.

    Stafford Smith told Al Jazeera: “Very few women are executed, but fewer still in Tennessee – it has been 200 years. So, this is a step back to about 1820. Christa was just a teenager, and had undergone horrendous abuse as a child. Now she is 50, a totally different person. It is so pointless – will this really make the world a more civilised place?”

    Slemmer’s mother, May Martinez, however, has spoken out in support of the execution.

    On Wednesday, a federal court temporarily put the planned execution on hold, on legal and technical grounds. But an hour before the midnight deadline for her execution was to expire, the US Supreme Court overruled the stay on her execution, paving the way for jail authorities to proceed.

    Pike had asked to be shot by an all-female firing squad instead of by lethal injection, which she said she feared would be too painful.

    Her lawyers had also argued that the injection would be torturous for her as she has “small veins”. This request was denied, however.

    INTERACTIVE - Women death penalty execution-1790756758

    How did the execution go wrong?

    Following the Supreme Court’s order to go ahead with the execution, Pike was administered two doses of the sedative pentobarbital at the Riverbend Maximum Security Institution in Nashville, Tennessee, on Wednesday evening, according to media witnesses.

    From outside the prison, The Associated Press journalist Kim Chandler reported that, initially, when the injections were administered, Pike appeared noticeably awake.

    “The blinds were closed for the first time to the execution chamber at 7:46pm (23:46 GMT), they opened again at 7:49pm (23:49 GMT),” Chandler said.

    “Her mouth fell open a few times, and she began to loudly snore. She gasped a few times,” she noted.

    “The curtain to the execution chamber closed for the final time at 8:06pm (00:06 GMT), and she could be heard loudly snoring, clearly very alive, in the chamber until media witnesses were told to leave the area at about 8:53pm (00:53 GMT),” Chandler added.

    The Tennessee Department of Correction did not immediately explain why the execution had not been completed.

    According to NBC News, late on Wednesday, Pike’s lawyers had filed a federal court motion during the process seeking again to halt her execution, citing witnesses’ accounts that “executioners had injected both syringes of lethal injection chemicals and Pike is still alive and snoring”.

    “Ms Pike has not lost consciousness and still has a heartbeat and is audibly snoring,” they said, according to the court documents seen by the media.

    Her lawyers also told US media that while she was being treated at a hospital, she needed “immediate medical care”.

    INTERACTIVE - Methods of execution death penalty-1790756756

    Why didn’t the execution work?

    Tennessee authorities have not explained this yet.

    However, Stafford Smith, who has attended several executions in support of clients in the past, told Al Jazeera that there are two probable reasons why the injection failed to kill Pike.

    “The first is that the drugs were probably out of date. Something that we’ve been observing a lot for the last 10 years is that they administer drugs that are no longer valid,” he said.

    Stafford Smith noted that there is, however, a valid reason for this, which is that drug companies make sedatives like pentobarbital to help people and save lives and are often opposed to their drugs being used to execute people.

    “So the states have a real problem getting drugs to kill people and they’ve gone to extraordinary extents with very unreliable providers. So you can suspect that they just had an invalid batch of drugs in Pike’s case,” Smith explained.

    “The other thing about Pike is that, as is very common with people who end up in her situation, they’ve been through a lot of abuse and drug abuse. So it might have been very hard to find her veins and get a needle into it. Moreover, doctors are also not allowed to take part in this process in the US. So they have incompetent people administering such drugs, which could have resulted in the injection failing,” he added.

    Defending its handling of the case, the Tennessee Department of Correction said in a statement late on Wednesday that the agency had “followed every step of the state’s lawful, established execution protocol approved by the Attorney General’s Office”.

    “The lethal injection chemical in the protocol has consistently been effective, and the protocol does not allow for additional procedures beyond what was carried out this evening. Christa Pike has been transported to an off-site medical facility,” the statement concluded.

    What happens to Pike next?

    At the moment, it is unclear, as Tennessee Governor Bill Lee has paused all remaining 2026 executions in the state following Wednesday’s incident with Pike and has called for a comprehensive, third-party review. She is currently in hospital. She may return to death row, but Stafford Smith said this is uncertain.

    INTERACTIVE - Which US states have the death penalty execution-1790756760

    Has this happened before?

    Yes. Botched executions do happen but the frequency varies substantially by method, according to data compiled by legal scholar Austin Sarat and the Death Penalty Information Center.

    In his 2014 book, Gruesome Spectacles: Botched Executions and America’s Death Penalty, Sarat noted that from 1890 to 2010, 8,776 people were executed in the US and 276 of those executions (3.15 percent) went wrong in some way. Sarat also noted that lethal injection was the method that had the highest rate of botched executions at 7.2 percent in this period.

    Previous botched lethal injection cases include the case of murderer Alva Campbell in November 2017 in Ohio. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, “the execution team first worked on both of Alva Campbell’s arms for about 30 minutes.. while he was on a gurney in the state’s death chamber and then tried to find a vein in his right leg below the knee. … About 80 minutes after the execution was scheduled to begin, the 69-year-old Campbell shook hands with two guards after it appeared the insertion was successful.”

    “About two minutes later … Gary Mohr, head of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction … called off the execution after talking with the medical team, [saying] ‘It was my decision that it was not likely that we’re going to access veins.’” But a few months later, in March, 2018, Campbell died on death row due to terminal medical conditions.

    “Botched executions have happened many times. I’ve had six of my clients executed over the years. Two were with the gas chamber, two with the electric chair and two with lethal injection, and there’s almost always some form of botching,” Stafford Smith said.

    “But it’s just an uncivilised process carried out by people who are pretty uncivilised,” he added.