Blog

  • Fox News Tops July Cable News Ratings While CNN And MS NOW Make Gains Vs. 2025

    Fox News Tops July Cable News Ratings While CNN And MS NOW Make Gains Vs. 2025

    Fox News topped the July ratings, but among the major cable news networks, MS NOW and CNN made gains during the month versus 2025.

    In primetime, Fox News averaged 2.33 million viewers, down 3% from the same month in 2025. MS NOW averaged 1.02 million, up 18%, while CNN posted 658,000, up 32%. In the 25-54 demo, Fox News averaged 204,000, down 21%, while CNN posted 102,000, up 11%, and MS NOW averaged 89,000, up 10%.

    In total day, Fox News averaged 1.5 million, down 2%, compared to 636,000 for MS NOW, up 20%, and 465,000 for CNN, up 26%. In the 25-54 demo, Fox News averaged 137,000, down 26%, while CNN posted 62,000, flat from a year earlier, and MS NOW was at 57,000, up 10%.

    Fox News’ The Five was the most watched show, averaging 3.31 million, followed by Jesse Watters Primetime with 2.98 million, Gutfeld! with 2.63 million, Hannity with 2.55 million and Special Report with Bret Baier with 2.52 million. In the 25-54 demo, the top shows were The Five with 300,000, followed by Jesse Watters Primetime with 267,000, Gutfeld! with 249,000, Hannity with 238,000 and Special Report with 224,000.

    MS NOW’s top show was The Rachel Maddow Show, averaging 2 million viewers, and CNN’s most watched program was Anderson Cooper 360, posting 739,000.

    Among other news networks, NewsNation averaged 141,000 in primetime and 15,000 in the 25-54 demo. The network said that their primetime total viewers rose by 32% versus last year and 25% in the demo. Newsmax averaged 202,000 in primetime and 9,000 in the demo.

    Newsmax’s top show was Rob Schmitt Tonight, averaging 306,000, and the top show on NewsNation was Cuomo, averaging 230,000.

    The figures are from Nielsen via the networks.

  • Stassi Schroeder Debuts New Reality Show: When and Where to Watch ‘House of Stassi’ Online

    Stassi Schroeder Debuts New Reality Show: When and Where to Watch ‘House of Stassi’ Online

    If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, The Hollywood Reporter may receive an affiliate commission.

    Following an eight-season run on Vanderpump Rules and three New York Times bestsellers, Stassi Schroeder continues to carve out a name for herself with a new unscripted series about mom life, family dynamics and her ever-evolving career. House of Stassi kicks off with a two-part premiere on July 29, from 9 to 11 p.m. PT/ET on Freeform, which can be livestreamed on any streaming service that carries said network, namely DirecTV (with a five-day free trial), Fubo, Sling and Hulu + Live TV.

    Alternatively, the entire eight-episode season will drop on Disney+/Hulu on Thursday, July 30, and while the streamer doesn’t offer a free trial directly, fans can get free access through any of DirecTV’s Signature packages, since they all include the Hulu and Disney+ bundle and offer a five-day free trial. This means new subscribers can watch the entire series when it drops on July 30 (and everything else the streamer has to offer) at absolutely no cost.

    At a Glance: How to Watch House of Stassi

    Where to Watch House of Stassi: Release Date, Air Time

    House of Stassi premieres on Wednesday, July 29, at 9 p.m. PT/ET with two back-to-back episodes on Freeform. After premiere night, new hour-long episodes will air weekly on Wednesdays at 10 p.m. PT/ET on Freeform.

    Where to Stream House of Stassi Online

    There are a couple of ways to stream House of Stassi online. Since it airs Wednesdays on Freeform starting with the two-part premiere on July 29, episodes will also be available to watch live on any streaming service that carries the network, including DirecTV (with a five-day free trial), Fubo, Sling and Hulu + Live TV.

    Alternatively, the entire first season will drop on Disney+/Hulu on Thursday, July 30, and while the streamer doesn’t offer a free trial directly, fans can get free access through any of DirecTV’s Signature packages, which include the Hulu and Disney+ bundle and offer a five-day free trial. This means new subscribers can watch the entire series when it drops on July 30 at no cost.

    More on each live TV streaming option — and their new subscriber discounts — below.

    Five-day free trial; packages from $19.99 per month

    Freeform, Hulu and Disney+ are included in any of DirecTV’s signature packages: Entertainment, Choice, Ultimate or Premier. Plus, DirecTV offers a five-day free trial for its streaming service, meaning new subscribers can tune in to the show at no cost.

    Learn more about each plan option, including how to build your own channel lineup (starting at just $19.99 per month), at directv.com.

    Fubo

    Up to $30 off first month; packages from $64.99 per month ($54.99 for first month)

    Freeform is also available to stream with a subscription to Fubo, which offers between $10 and $30 off for the first month. Plans start at $54.99 during the first month and $64.99 monthly thereafter.

    Plans from $4.99 per day or $19.99 per month

    Freeform is included in Sling’s Orange Plan, from $45.99 per month or $4.99 per day, and Sling’s Orange & Blue plan, from $60.99 per month. Visit Sling.com to check station availability and package options, starting as low as $4.99 per day or $19.99 per month.

    Three-day free trial; packages from $89.99 per month

    Watch Freeform for free with a three-day trial to Hulu + Live TV. Subscriptions come bundled with Disney+ and ESPN+, and start at $89.99 per month.

    House of Stassi Cast

    Main season one castmembers include Stassi Schroeder, Katie Maloney, Beau Clark, Kristina Kelly, Taylor Strecker, Georgianna Aubin, Taylor Donohue and Rob Evors.

  • Amanda Ip, Jay Baruchel, Ciara Bravo and Kevin Durand to Star Opposite Alan Ritchson in ‘Reacher’

    Amanda Ip, Jay Baruchel, Ciara Bravo and Kevin Durand to Star Opposite Alan Ritchson in ‘Reacher’

    With less than two weeks to go before the season four premiere of Reacher, Amazon Prime Video is setting the stage for what follows that batch of episodes by confirming a quartet of actors for season five.

    Amanda Ip, Jay Baruchel, Ciara Bravo and Kevin Durand will star opposite Alan Ritchson as Reacher in the fifth season that will be based on Lee Child’s novel Make Me. The series — from executive producer and showrunner Nick Santora and produced by Paramount Television Studios and Amazon MGM Studios — will catch up with Ritchson’s title character after his train stops in the mysterious town of Mother’s Rest where he teams with a private investigator in the search for a missing person.

    In classic Reacher fashion, he winds up uncovering a dangerous and deadly criminal conspiracy. Ip will play Michelle Chang with Baruchel taking on the role as Chief Buck Bauer. Bravo assumes the role of Eunice, and Durand will play Nokes.

    Amanda Ip, Jay Baruchel, Ciara Bravo and Kevin Durand

    Courtesy of Amazon Studios

    Canadian actor Ip is known for a recurring role as Carmen on CTV’s medical drama Transplant. Her TV credits also include Cross, Hudson & Rex, Plan B and Guess Who. She’s repped by Characters Talent Agency.

    Baruchel is a veteran actor known for a long list of credits including This Is the End, Knocked Up, She’s Out of My League, Tropic Thunder, The Trotsky, The Sorcerer’s Apprentice, FUBAR, The Moodys, Man Seeking Woman, The Last Girlfriend on Earth, BlackBerry and the Oscar-winning best picture Million Dollar Baby. He voiced Hiccup in DreamWorks Animation’s How to Train Your Dragon and turned in multi-hyphenate work on Random Acts of Violence and Goon: Last of the Enforcers.

    He can next be seen in The Stunt Driver as real-life Canadian daredevil Ken Carter opposite Ed Helms and Ben Foster. The film will have a world premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival in September. Baruchel repped by CAA, Thruline Entertainment and Lichter, Grossman, Nichols, Feldman, Rogal, Shikora & Clark.

    Bravo’s year has included a turn in the title role opposite Zoey Deutch in Leah McKendrick’s Voicemails for Isabelle and starring opposite Marisa Tomei in You’re Dating A Narcissist!. Her other credits include Joe and Anthony Russo’s Cherry opposite Tom Holland, Small Engine Repair opposite Jon Bernthal, A Teacher alongside Kate Mara and Nick Robinson and Shawn Simmons’ Wayne. She next stars in Justin Lin’s Last Days. Bravo is repped by UTA and Myman Greenspan Fox Rosenberg Mobasser Younger & Light.

    Durand is also a veteran actor with a long list of credits like Ryan Coogler’s Fruitvale Station, Atom Egoyan’s The Captive opposite Ryan Reynolds, David Cronenberg’s Cosmopolis opposite Robert Pattinson, Resident Evil: Retribution, Shawn Levy’s Real Steel opposite Hugh Jackman, Robin Hood opposite Russell Crowe, James Mangold’s 3:10 to Yuma with Crowe and Christian Bale, X-Men Origins: Wolverine alongside Hugh Jackman, Joe Carnahan’s Smokin’ Aces opposite Chris Pine and Walt Becker’s Wild Hogs with John Travolta, Tim Allen and Martin Lawrence.

    Other credits include the Naked Gun update, Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes, Abigail, Ready or Not: Here I Come, Locke & Key, Swamp Thing, Ballers, The Strain, Trial & Error, Vikings and the upcoming feature The Boy in the Iron Box based on the novel by Guillermo del Toro and Chuck Hogan. Durand is repped by CAA, Alchemy Entertainment and Brecheen Feldman Breimer.

    As mentioned above, Reacher’s new season debuts Aug. 12, and it will be based on Child’s Gone Tomorrow. The story follows Reacher after he has a chance and disturbing encounter with a distraught stranger on the subway. Sydelle Noel, Chris Marquette, Agnez Mo, Anggun, Kevin Weisman, Marc Blucas, Kevin Corrigan and Kathleen Robertson round out the cast. In addition to Santora and Child, Ritchson serves as an executive producer on season four alongside Don Granger, Scott Sullivan, Mick Betancourt, Lisa Kussner, Sam Hill, Amy Pocha and Seth Cohen. Carolyn Harris and Kenny Madrid are executives-in-charge for Paramount Television Studios.

  • How to Watch Today’s 2026 MLS All-Stars vs. Liga MX All-Stars Game Live (Even for Free)

    How to Watch Today’s 2026 MLS All-Stars vs. Liga MX All-Stars Game Live (Even for Free)

    How to watch for free: Unlike the World Cup, the MLS All Stars vs. Liga MX game is not available for free with a VPN, but you may be able to watch it for free using an Apple TV free trial.


    Today’s the day. After a month of breathtaking FIFA World Cup soccer, this beautiful game is expected to get another boost in popularity as two professional club leagues compete in the MLS All-Star Game this week. As with the last two editions, this exhibition match will feature the best players from the MLS facing the top players from Mexico’s Liga MX.

    The MLS All-Star game debuted in this format in 2021, and currently, MLS All-Stars lead the rivalry 3-1. As they face off for the fifth time, fans on both sides will be eager to see which league gets regional bragging rights. If you can’t wait to catch the action, here are all the details you need to watch the 2026 MLS vs. Liga MX All-Star Game live using a streaming subscription.


    When Is the 2026 MLS All-Star Game?

    The 2026 MLS All-Stars vs. Liga MX game will kick off today at 8 p.m. ET on Wednesday, July 29, at the Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, North Carolina. There will also be a halftime performance by Grammy Award-winning artist Ciara.


    Where to Watch the 2026 MLS All-Star Game

    Apple and MLS logos on a soccer field

    (Credit: Apple/MLS)

    The 2026 MLS All-Star Game will stream on Apple TV, which has the official broadcasting rights for the league and its events through 2033.

    You don’t need a dedicated MLS pass to watch the All-Star Game. In fact, Apple dropped the pass last year and made all MLS games available via its regular subscription, which now starts at $12.99 per month.


    How to Watch the 2026 MLS All-Star Game for Free

    Since Apple TV is the only streamer airing this game in the US, fans have only one option to catch the action. Thankfully, though, there are a few ways you can get an Apple TV subscription for free.

    The easiest option is for first-time Apple TV subscribers. The streaming service offers a 7-day free trial for new subscribers, allowing you to tune into the MLS All-Star Game at no extra cost.

    Another free trial option is available to those who recently purchased a new Apple device and haven’t subscribed to Apple TV before. The iPhone-maker offers three months of free Apple TV to such customers, and they can redeem the offer within 90 days. The Apple One bundle also comes with a 30-day free trial to Apple TV.


    Can You Watch the 2026 MLS All-Star Game With a VPN?

    Technically, you can watch the MLS All-Star game with a virtual private network (VPN) if you need to access AppleTV from another country. But you won’t be able to bypass the Apple TV paywall. Unlike the World Cup, which offered several free livestreams in different countries, you won’t be able to use a VPN to watch the MLS All-Star game for free in the US.


    Will Lionel Messi Play in the MLS All-Star Game?

    Inter Miami's Lionel Messi versus Philadelphia Union at NU Stadium on May 24, 2026 in Miami,Florida

    (Credit: Chris Arjoon/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images))

    Soccer legend and Inter Miami star Lionel Messi will be notably absent from the 2026 MLS All-Star Game. This is the second year in a row he is missing the game; he was penalized with a one-game suspension for missing last year’s, but he will be allowed to take a break this year to recover from his tiring 2026 World Cup final against Argentina.

    His club and country teammate Rodrigo De Paul has also been excused for the same reason.

    “Prior to the start of the 2026 season, Major League Soccer and the MLS Players Association agreed that upon a player’s exit from the World Cup competition, clubs would have individual conversations with each player to determine the appropriate rest and return to training and competition timeline. Consistent with that agreement, Rodrigo De Paul and Lionel Messi will be excused from participating in the 2026 MLS All-Star Game,” MLS said in a statement.

    Though Messi and De Paul will be missed, the MLS vs. Liga MX All-Star Game features other big names from world soccer, including 2014 World Cup winner Thomas Müller and South Korean star Son Heung-Min.

    Unlock Your Streaming Service’s Full Catalog

    PCMag Logo

    Unlock Your Streaming Service’s Full Catalog


    Lineups: MLS All-Stars vs. Liga MX All-Stars

    Both teams have a mix of local and international stars, and 15 of them played in the recently concluded 2026 FIFA World Cup;  11 of those players play in the MLS, while four play in Liga MX.

    MLS Roster

    Charlotte FC’s Dean Smith will manage the MLS All-Stars this year. Here’s a look at the roster he can pick his 11 players from:

    • Goalkeepers: Maxime Crépeau (Orlando City SC), Matt Freese (New York City FC), and Brian Schwake (Nashville SC).

    • Defenders: Max Arfsten (Columbus Crew), Lucas Herrington (Colorado Rapids), Richie Laryea (Toronto FC), Anthony Markanich (Minnesota United FC), Steven Moreira (Columbus Crew), Daniel Munie (San Jose Earthquakes), Andy Najar (Nashville SC), Jackson Ragen (Seattle Sounders FC), and Tim Ream (Charlotte FC).

    • Midfielders: Sebastian Berhalter (Vancouver Whitecaps FC), Pep Biel (Charlotte FC), Yannick Bright (Inter Miami CF), Andrés Cubas (Vancouver Whitecaps FC), Evander (FC Cincinnati), Carles Gil (New England Revolution), Zavier Gozo (Real Salt Lake), Hany Mukhtar (Nashville SC), Thomas Müller (Vancouver Whitecaps FC), Ashley Westwood (Charlotte FC)

    • Forwards: Anders Dreyer (San Diego FC), Guilherme (Houston Dynamo FC), Julian Hall (Red Bull New York), Son Heung-Min (LAFC), Petar Musa (FC Dallas), Sam Surridge (Nashville SC), and Philip Zinckernagel (Chicago Fire FC)

    Keep an eye out for Petar Musa, who leads the current MLS season’s scoring with 13 goals and appeared for Croatia at the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

    Liga MX Roster

    Deportivo Toluca’s coach, Antonio Mohamed, will manage the Liga MX All-Stars, and here’s the roster he can pick his playing XI from:

    • Defenders: Omar Campos (Cruz Azul), Willer Ditta (Cruz Azul), Jesús Gallardo (Toluca FC), Jesús Garza (Tigres UANL), Bruno Méndez (Toluca FC), Federico Pereira (Toluca FC), Luis Gabriel Rey (Chivas Guadalajara), Israel Reyes (Club América), and Nathan Silva (Pumas UNAM)

    • Midfielders: Juan Brunetta (Tigres UANL), Iker Fimbres (CF Monterrey), Fernando Gorriarán (Tigres UANL), Erik Lira (Cruz Azul), Elías Montiel (CF Pachuca), José Paradela (Cruz Azul), Carlos Rodríguez (Cruz Azul), Franco Romero (Toluca FC), and Javier Ruiz (Necaxa)

    • Forwards: Kevin Castañeda (Chivas Guadalajara), Alexei Domínguez (CF Pachuca), Salomón Rondón (CF Pachuca), and Robert Morales (Pumas UNAM)

    About Our Expert

  • The Bruin Theater in Westwood Village to Reopen: ‘It’s a Magical Place’

    The Bruin Theater in Westwood Village to Reopen: ‘It’s a Magical Place’

    The Bruin Theater in Los Angeles’ Westwood Village is set to reopen in October, with the announcement capping a big month for the city’s movie lovers. Last week, Sony Pictures announced it will take over operation of the Cinerama Dome with Alamo Drafthouse running the former ArcLight theaters multiplex.

    Now the Bruin Theater, built in 1937, is planned to reopen in October with Rui Pereira, a Canadian theater operator, taking over the lease for the historic site. “It’s a magical place,” says Pereira, who also operates Toronto’s Kingsway Theater.

    Pereira plans to add 35mm and 70mm projection and program first-run movies, classic films and special events. The sound system has had recent upgrades, according to Ben Steinberg, who helped bring attention to the Cinerama Dome reopening and is assisting Pereira with marketing.

    “We want to keep the essence of the theater,” says Pereira, who wants it to feel upgraded but still like a classic theater.

    “It’s not just about the movies — it’s about going out to the movies, going out to do something. The latest example is ‘The Odyssey’ — you see the excitement and the interest that’s generated,” Pereira says. Before the opening, the marquee will display ads for “Practical Magic 2” as well as promotions for UCLA, he adds.

    The 670-seat Bruin is less than half the size of the Village across the street, which was taken over by Jason Reitman and his consortium of filmmakers and is now operating as Director’s Village before a renovation planned for the fall. The Bruin played an important role in Quentin Tarantino’s “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” when Margot Robbie’s character Sharon Tate goes to the theater to watch the movie she stars in, “The Wrecking Crew.”

    The Bruin has been shuttered since 2024, when Regency Theatres’ lease ended at both the Village and the Bruin.

    Once the bustling hub of moviegoing on the Westside of Los Angeles, Westwood’s theaters have gradually shut down over the past few decades. The Landmark Westwood, opened in 1946, is still in operation on Broxton, while Blue Fox Entertainment recently took over the iPic Theater on Wilshire. Westsiders have largely migrated to AMC’s Century City 15, while the Landmark’s Nuart and Laemmle’s Royal continue to program specialty films on Santa Monica Boulevard.

  • ‘The Man Will Burn’ and the Battle Beneath Burning Man’s Chaos

    ‘The Man Will Burn’ and the Battle Beneath Burning Man’s Chaos

    There is a bungee-strap battle that goes down inside a geodesic “Thunderdome” arena and, one year, revelers found a 23-foot-tall, 50-foot-long hedgehog temple erected on the playa in Nevada, where Black Rock City has risen nearly every Labor Day week for the past 40 years. And let’s not overlook the central wooden effigy itself, collapsing and engulfed in flames as steampunk Mad Max extras dance and laugh and cry.

    Of all the dazzling visuals and surreal art that burst out of Burning Man, the large-scale, weeklong desert event that is now so vital that it has spawned its own subculture, it’s the images seen about seven minutes into HBO‘s The Man Will Burn that are truly surprising: Rather than “Burners” running wild in costumes and dancing in the dust, the four-part documentary opens on a boardroom, with charts indicating cash flow. And then there are the actual people who, all year long, schlep to the office and run the business of Burning Man. Here, they are arguing about how to pay for it.

    If you were left wondering whether the series, which began streaming weekly on HBO Max on July 9 and concludes Thursday, was a deliberate provocation, the series’ directors, Jehane Noujaim and Vikram Gandhi, cleared that up while speaking with The Hollywood Reporter last week.

    “We’re documentary filmmakers, so we’re interested in reality,” Gandhi said about the series, which premiered at the Tribeca Festival in June. “The whole point of Burning Man is to not think about the gifting economy and the decommodification part of it — that’s what happens out on the playa. But when you peel back the layer behind the event, that’s what’s going on. Everything has a cost.”

    That tension — between a 40-year-old social experiment premised on resisting institutions and the institution it had to become to survive — is one of the many aspects of the phenomenon that The Man Will Burn interrogates. Noujaim and Gandhi spent five years filming with unprecedented access to the Burning Man Project’s leadership. They begin the journey just as the organization is faced with what Noujaim called “one of the greatest existential crises” in its history: the COVID-19 pandemic threatening the very premise the event is built upon, which is simply that people show up.

    Noujaim, an Emmy winner known for The Square and The Vow, said she and Gandhi — who directed the biting and, as some argued, immoral 2011 documentary Kumaré — were drawn to the project precisely because the stakes were so undeniably real.

    “Even though many of the people that put this together have very different concepts of what they want to create, they do share this belief that it should happen every year, and they feel very strongly about that,” she said. “The stakes for all of the characters that we were following were very high. And I think when that happens, the true human nature comes out — and that’s wonderful for a film.”

    Producer Muriel Soenens, who came to the project as “the non-burner of the team,” as she explained to THR, said the pandemic demanded answers to questions the community had been letting linger for years.

    “It basically had opened up a Pandora’s box of issues that had been plaguing them since the early days: Do we grow or not? Who does this belong to? Does this belong to anybody? And if it does, who should be leading this?” she said. “As anarchy grows in numbers, it can no longer be truly radical. It can’t be as free as it was.”

    As the series barrels forward through crisis management and office politics to the chaos that rain on the playa can cause, we watch as an event built on the idea that no one is in charge is forced by circumstances to reveal who actually is.

    Making The Man Will Burn land was always going to hinge on access, which took years to earn, scene by scene. The filmmakers say the Burning Man Project’s leadership — including CEO Marian Goodell, a central figure throughout the series — gave them startling latitude, including in a boardroom scene during the depths of the crisis.

    “I don’t think anything was off limits from the organization,” Gandhi said. But the organization, he added, was “only a tiny part of the access” — every camp, every art-car crew, every individual required separate, often lengthy negotiation. “Sometimes we would have to talk to people for 45 minutes, or months, before shooting for five minutes,” he said.

    That’s not to say Goodell herself was resistant at first, Noujaim said.

    “Marian was very much like, ‘This film is not about me, it’s not about one person,’” Noujaim said. “But we really pushed forward with following her because she was at the center of any big decision that was going to be made.” The access deepened over successive years, a dynamic Gandhi described bluntly: “As you are stood up for the fifth interview, then they’ll give you the sixth, and maybe it’ll be nicer or more open than it would have been if they hadn’t stood you up five times.”

    Marian Goodell in The Man Will Burn.

    Courtesy of HBO

    Consent, the filmmakers said, was unusually fraught for a documentary in 2026 — a rarity, Soenens noted, in the social media era, when people are eager, or at least used to being on camera.

    “There is really the deep question of, do I want to be filmed,” she said, adding that some longtime attendees declined outright, believing no documentary could capture what the event actually feels like, or objecting on principle to it being filmed at all.

    Of the many conundrums and debates about Burning Man, it may not be too surprising that the series’ most pointed material concerns money — specifically, the encroachment of wealthy tech figures, including Kimbal Musk, who have become entangled in Burning Man’s finances and, therefore, have a seat at the table in its governance. But Gandhi pushed back on the idea that tech wealth itself threatens the event’s spirit; tech money, he noted, has been present at Burning Man since the 1990s. The more interesting question, he said, is about participation versus consumption: “Are people going without participating and buying an experience, rather than working on the experience?”

    Yet how money concentrates power is on full display here. Musk, Gandhi said, “was maybe the loudest voice in the room” during a boardroom debate over whether to cancel the event outright — a moment that crystallizes how an organization “running on debt” ends up dependent on its wealthiest members, above its founding ideals.

    Noujaim framed it as an argument the film wants viewers to sit with rather than resolve.

    “It’s not whether people have money or don’t have money. It’s more this question of: Are people coming in to build together, to give and to sacrifice — which enables human connection — rather than the connection we normally deal with, which is very transactional?” she said. The struggle, she adds, is real and ongoing inside the organization itself, which works to prevent “plug-and-play” camps, where wealth substitutes for participation as the wealthy parachute into Black Rock City.

    Asked what they wished they could include, the filmmakers pointed to structural gaps rather than deliberate omissions. Because the series is character-driven, storylines that didn’t touch their core subjects largely fell away, even ones with some true dramatic weight. They also mention a widely reported and still-unsolved death at the event that happened the year after filming wrapped; Noujaim said she and Gandhi weren’t present for it and had only secondhand information, but it’s a thread in the story of Burning Man that shows how its growth is leading to the seeping in of chaos.

    Two pursuits, they said, nearly made it into the final cut but didn’t: a ride-along with the event’s volunteer rangers, complicated by the fact that there’s no cell service on the playa to coordinate filming, and a stint at the event’s makeshift hospital, where the crew nearly captured a premature birth — HIPAA privacy rules shut the access down. Both, Gandhi said, spoke to an underappreciated reality — that Black Rock City is “a city running a city,” with real infrastructure and real emergencies behind the drugs and art and fun.

    For all the institutional friction the series documents, both directors indicated that what caught them off guard wasn’t the conflict — it was the playful tone. “The humor,” Gandhi said, “the level of humor and self-deprecation that keeps it way less earnest than you would expect. They are the first to cut themselves down and question themselves and consider themselves flawed and imperfect. They don’t like calling it a utopia.”

    Noujaim said she was struck by the scale and the sheer amount of volunteer labor required to build and dismantle an 80,000-person city in the desert, most of it unpaid.

    “There’s nothing like it on Earth,” she said. “People put more effort into building something than most people put into their jobs — and more joy in working.” It’s a note the film leans into deliberately, she added, precisely because it pushes against what most people assume Burning Man is in reality — not a party bought and consumed, but one built, hour by unpaid hour, by those who simply show up.

  • What Are Tokenized Stocks? The $9 Billion Trend Explained

    What Are Tokenized Stocks? The $9 Billion Trend Explained

    Imagine buying a slice of Apple stock at 3 a.m. on a Sunday, settling in seconds, from a crypto wallet, with no broker involved. That is the promise of tokenized stocks, and it stopped being theoretical this year: on-chain transfer volume for tokenized equities reached $9.22 billion in a single month. This guide explains what tokenized stocks actually are, how they work, who is building them, what you really own when you buy one, and the risks that most coverage skips.

    What are tokenized stocks?

    A tokenized stock is a blockchain-based token that represents ownership or economic exposure to a real company’s shares. Instead of your Apple or Tesla position living only in a broker’s database, a token representing it lives on a blockchain, where it can be transferred, traded, or used in other applications around the clock.

    The key word is “represents.” In most current models, an authorized issuer buys and holds the actual shares with a regulated custodian, then issues tokens backed one-to-one against them. The token tracks the share’s value and, depending on the product, may pass through dividends. You are typically holding a claim on a share rather than the registered share itself, which is the single most important distinction to understand before buying one.

    Why anyone bothers: the actual advantages

    Traditional stock markets run on infrastructure built decades ago, with fixed hours and multi-day settlement. Tokenization targets exactly those limits.

    Trading never closes. Blockchains do not have opening bells. Tokenized equities can trade on weekends and overnight, which matters enormously for investors outside US time zones who currently trade American stocks at inconvenient hours or not at all.

    Settlement is near-instant. Traditional equity settlement takes a business day or more. On-chain settlement happens in seconds, freeing capital and removing counterparty risk in the gap.

    Fractional access is native. Tokens divide easily, so a $500 share can be bought in tiny increments without a broker building that feature.

    Global reach. Someone in a country with limited access to US brokerage accounts can, in principle, hold exposure to US equities through a wallet.

    Composability. This is the crypto-native advantage: a tokenized stock can be used inside decentralized finance applications, for example as collateral, in ways a brokerage position cannot.

    How big is this actually?

    Big enough to stop being a curiosity. Monthly on-chain transfer volume for tokenized stocks reached $9.22 billion in June 2026 (live RWA data on rwa.xyz), a sharp increase that reflects real usage rather than pilot projects.

    The activity is heavily concentrated on Solana, which handles roughly 95% of global tokenized equity trading volume, with single-day records around $644 million. The trend reached a symbolic milestone when Securitize, a tokenization firm, tokenized $295 million of its own stock on Solana on the day of its NYSE debut, the largest issuer-sponsored tokenized stock at launch.

    Institutional infrastructure is following. Moody’s launched credit ratings for tokenized assets, South Korea has explored tokenizing government bonds and state assets, and traditional finance firms have been building settlement rails on public blockchains. Ripple and BCG have projected the broader tokenized real-world asset market could exceed $19 trillion across blockchains by 2033, a forecast worth treating as directional rather than precise.

    What you actually own (read this part twice)

    This is where enthusiasm meets fine print, and it deserves plain language.

    In most tokenized stock products, you do not become a shareholder of record. You typically hold a token issued by a company, backed by shares that company or its custodian holds. That usually means no voting rights, dividend treatment that depends on the specific product, and, critically, a dependency on the issuer remaining solvent and honest.

    Compare that with a normal brokerage account, where you are a beneficial owner with regulatory protections, insurance schemes in many jurisdictions, and a clear legal claim. Tokenized stocks trade convenience for a different, generally thinner, set of protections. That is a legitimate trade for some investors, but it is a trade, not a free upgrade.

    The risks

    Issuer and custody risk. Your token is only as good as the entity holding the underlying shares. If that issuer fails or the backing is not what it claims, the token’s value is at risk regardless of what the real stock does.

    Regulatory uncertainty. Rules for tokenized securities are still forming in most jurisdictions. Products can be restricted, geo-blocked, or forced to change structure. Availability to US retail investors in particular is limited and shifting.

    Liquidity gaps. Headline volume is concentrated in a handful of popular names. A thinly traded tokenized stock can have wide spreads and poor exits, especially during volatility.

    Price tracking can break. In stressed markets, a token’s price can drift from the underlying share, particularly when traditional markets are closed and there is no way to arbitrage the gap efficiently.

    Smart contract risk. These are blockchain products, and blockchain products can have code vulnerabilities, as DeFi’s history shows.

    Corporate actions get messy. Splits, mergers, and special dividends are straightforward in traditional markets and genuinely complicated to represent on-chain.

    Who is building tokenized stocks

    The ecosystem splits roughly into three groups. Tokenization specialists like Securitize handle issuance and compliance infrastructure. Blockchains compete to host the activity, with Solana currently dominant on volume thanks to low fees and fast settlement, while Ethereum hosts much of the broader real-world asset market. And trading venues, both crypto exchanges and emerging on-chain platforms, provide the access layer.

    An interesting wrinkle: because Solana’s fees are so low, billions in tokenized stock volume generate relatively little direct fee revenue for the network. Hosting the boom and monetizing it are not the same thing, which is a genuine open question for the chains involved.

    Is this the future of stock trading?

    The honest answer is that it is a real trend with real limits. The advantages, continuous trading, instant settlement, global access, are genuine and solve actual problems that traditional market infrastructure has not. Institutional adoption is no longer speculative: rating agencies, governments, and NYSE-listed firms are participating.

    But the ownership structure is weaker than direct share ownership, regulation is unsettled, and most volume today comes from crypto-native traders rather than mainstream investors. The likely path is not tokenized stocks replacing brokerages, but traditional finance gradually adopting blockchain settlement underneath products that look familiar to investors. Tokenization is more likely to become invisible plumbing than a consumer revolution.

    Bottom line

    Tokenized stocks are blockchain tokens representing real company shares, offering round-the-clock trading, near-instant settlement, fractional ownership, and global access. The trend became substantial in 2026, with $9.22 billion in monthly on-chain volume and Solana handling around 95% of it, alongside serious institutional participation.

    The catch is what you own: usually a claim backed by an issuer rather than a registered share, with fewer protections than a brokerage account and unsettled regulation around it. Tokenized stocks are a genuine infrastructure advance worth understanding, and a product category that demands you read the specific terms before buying, not just the pitch.

    This is not investment advice. Tokenized assets carry issuer, regulatory, and liquidity risks in addition to normal market risk. Always do your own research.

  • Flock Cameras Face Growing Backlash as Privacy Concerns Reach Capitol Hill

    Flock Cameras Face Growing Backlash as Privacy Concerns Reach Capitol Hill

    In brief

    • Rep. Thomas Massie plans legislation that would withhold federal funding from agencies deploying Flock cameras.
    • Local governments from California to Indiana have suspended, canceled, or reconsidered Flock deployments following public opposition.
    • Flock CEO Garrett Langley recently apologized for referring to anti-surveillance activists as “terrorists.”

    Public opposition to Flock Safety’s automated license plate reader cameras is spreading from city council meetings to Capitol Hill as lawmakers prepare legislation targeting federal funding for agencies that deploy the technology while communities across the country reconsider its use.

    The protests come amid mounting evidence that Flock’s technology has been used in ways critics say extend well beyond its stated purpose of investigating crimes and locating missing people.

    A recent report by The Institute for Justice identified over two dozen cases nationwide in which officers resigned or were arrested for allegedly using automated license plate reader systems to stalk current or former romantic partners.

    In February, Milwaukee prosecutors charged an officer accused of using the system to track a romantic partner and her former partner. In July, an internal affairs detective who investigated that case was arrested after authorities alleged he also used Flock to track people for personal reasons.

    Privacy advocates also cite broader uses of the technology. The Electronic Frontier Foundation says agencies searched license plate databases during protests, including the No Kings protests in 2025. That same year, the group reported that Texas deputies queried Flock data during an abortion investigation that authorities initially described as a missing-person case.

    Opposition has also moved beyond public meetings. During June and July, activists across the country spray-painted, taped over, disabled and destroyed Flock cameras in protest of automated surveillance. The Guardian identified at least 33 incidents across 23 states. Online communities have shared camera maps, tips for avoiding the devices and methods for obstructing them, while several people now face criminal charges after allegedly destroying multiple cameras.

    Founded in 2017, Atlanta-based Flock Safety sells internet-connected license plate reader cameras that automatically photograph passing vehicles, read license plates, and use computer vision to identify characteristics such as a vehicle’s make, model, color, decals, roof racks, and other distinguishing features. Participating law enforcement agencies can search the database during criminal investigations, receive alerts when vehicles linked to cases pass a camera, recover stolen vehicles, and locate missing people.

    Flock says its cameras do not use facial recognition and typically retain data for 30 days unless local laws require a different retention period. CEO Garrett Langley said the company takes privacy concerns seriously and believes many critics reconsider their views once they understand how the technology works.

    “Once they understand what the technology actually does, not what it might do in 50 years, not what someone thinks it could do, but what it actually does day in and day out, it takes a picture of a car. Most people go, ‘This makes a lot of sense. I want my kids to be safe,’” Langley told ABC7.

    In a post on X on Saturday, Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie said that he plans to introduce legislation that would withhold federal funding from municipalities and law enforcement agencies that deploy automated license plate reader systems, including Flock cameras.

    The proposal follows a series of disputes over Flock cameras across the United States.

    In St. Petersburg, Florida, 77-year-old Carl Gunn has drawn attention by staging solo protests beneath Flock cameras, holding a sign that blocks their view.

    “This is just another thing to take our information and to spy on us,” Gunn told news outlet Creative Loafing Tampa Bay. “I have a constitutional right to my privacy. I’m a law-abiding citizen, and I don’t need anyone sticking their nose in my business. And if they do, I’m going to chop it off.”

    In Fresno, California, residents packed a community forum to urge city officials to remove Flock cameras, arguing the technology allows broad government surveillance. Police defended the system, saying it helped investigators solve homicide and shooting cases and emphasizing that it does not use facial recognition.

    “We have to find a balance between safety and liberty,” Fresno Police Chief Mindy Casto reportedly said.

    However, not all law enforcement agencies are on board with using Flock cameras and are re-evaluating their use of the technology. On Thursday, the Los Angeles Police Department suspended its partnership with Flock over concerns involving privacy, data sharing, security, and contract terms. Monroe County, Indiana, also voted to end its contract a year early, despite commissioners acknowledging the cameras had helped solve serious crimes. Earlier in July, Leon County, Florida, delayed funding for additional Flock cameras after residents questioned how the data is collected, stored, and shared.

    The scrutiny has prompted a response from the company. Earlier this month, Langley apologized for previously describing anti-Flock activists as a “terroristic organization,” saying the comments were a mistake and that the company has spent more time listening to critics while trying to balance public safety and privacy.

    “My comments were a mistake, and I apologize,” he told Forbes. “There are groups today that have real valid criticisms of the business, and I think what’s changed for us is, as we’ve listened to them and heard them out, what we’re trying to do is find this balance. We believe in a world where we can have safety and privacy.”

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • ‘Children of Blood and Bone’ Author Tomi Adeyemi Left Film’s Set ‘Sobbing,’ Calls It the ‘Worst Thing I’ve Had to Live Through’ and ‘I Never Want to Hear About It Again’

    ‘Children of Blood and Bone’ Author Tomi Adeyemi Left Film’s Set ‘Sobbing,’ Calls It the ‘Worst Thing I’ve Had to Live Through’ and ‘I Never Want to Hear About It Again’

    Tomi Adeyemi, author of the novel “Children of Blood and Bone,” said the upcoming Paramount film adaptation of her book was “the worst thing I have ever had to live through” and “I never want to hear about this project again” in a five-minute video posted on Wednesday.

    Adeyemi, who co-wrote the screenplay for the film, had previously spoken out about how she wouldn’t watch the “Children of Blood and Bone” movie based on her African fantasy novel after being on set for its production.

    “What I’m about to share is not a secret to the people involved,” she said in the social media clip. “It’s a reality that I’ve had to live with for about a year and a half, and everyone involved, at least at the highest level, has been made aware of this reality, and they haven’t done anything to make it better. If anything, they’ve only antagonized me, and I accept that. But I also accept if I don’t say something, I think it’s just going to be worse.”

    Adeyemi alleged that she left the “Children of Blood and Bone” set “hyperventilating and sobbing” and that she is “still being antagonized behind the scenes.” Representatives for Adeyemi, Paramount and director Gina Prince-Bythewood did not immediately respond to Variety’s requests for comment.

    “I’m not going to speak on what I endured to make it through the young adult trilogy, and I’m not going to speak about everything that I also suffered through or endured to make the adaptation a reality,” Adeyemi said. “I’m actually only going to speak about what happened after I left that set of my own film adaptation, hyperventilating and sobbing. There are many witnesses, so it’s not really a secret. I came back to America and suffered such severe somatic pain and so many panic attacks. I knew it was so bad that I would never ever be able to watch this film, and I made peace with that.”

    “But as it is being marketed,” Adeyemi continued, referencing the trailer which launched on Tuesday, “And as I am still being antagonized behind the scenes, which is where I hoped all of this would stay, it’s become apparent to me that reality needs to at least be made known, so that you guys can understand how this film, which I worked on to make it a little better for us to be alive, is also the worst thing I have ever had to live through.”

    Earlier this month in a since-deleted TikTok video, Adeyemi posted what appeared to be a group chat that included “Children of Blood and Bone” actor Amandla Stenberg. Adeyemi wrote, “Do not ever use my name in an interview or video again. Do not text me. Do not call me” and appeared to block Stenberg, according to the L.A. Times. Stenberg had previously received backlash from book fans over her casting as Princess Amari due to allegations of colorism.

    “I am four months into training for ‘Children of Blood and Bone’ and I am getting my ass whooped,” Stenberg previously said in a deleted TikTok video last year. “I want everyone to know that this is important to me, and I think about it with every choice that I make. I would never navigate my career blindly, not thinking about my skin tone or the space I occupy. I would never go after a role I didn’t feel was right for me. I want to see all skin tones represented in media. I know that colorism is an insidious system that relentlessly impacts every facet of entertainment.”

    Despite the insinuation about a feud with Stenberg, Adeyemi has not clarified what happened on the “Children of Blood and Bone” set.

    “I don’t wish to speak on it anymore. I don’t know if that’s possible,” Adeyemi said in the clip posted on Wednesday. “I understand that I have a public presence, and that this is a global project. It’s probably useless posting a video. I really don’t know. I don’t do things like this, but I also understand that being silent about it is making the pain a lot worse. And even though it feels awful to share this, it’s better to share it and have it known and understood before I see a bunch of you for this new book. So please understand, I never want to hear about this project again. I don’t have anything to say about the people who made it. I do not care anymore. I’m trying to move on. This video might make it worse, but I don’t know how it can be any worse. So I’m just going to share that and let it live.”

    “Children of Blood and Bone” hits theaters on Jan. 15.

  • Crypto entering biggest consolidation phase in history, says ARK analyst

    Crypto entering biggest consolidation phase in history, says ARK analyst

    An ARK Invest analyst says the cryptocurrency industry is entering what he describes as its biggest consolidation phase yet, with revenue increasingly concentrated among a handful of dominant protocols.

    In a Wednesday post on X, Lorenzo Valente, a research associate at ARK Invest, said investors have become increasingly selective, making it harder for crypto projects and exchanges without strong product-market fit to attract capital. As weaker projects struggle or shut down, revenue is becoming concentrated among a small number of dominant protocols, he said.

    As evidence, Valente said perpetual futures exchange Hyperliquid and memecoin launchpad Pump.fun account for roughly 67% of total crypto application revenue. Including synthetic dollar protocol Ethena raises the top three’s combined share to nearly 80%, highlighting what he described as record-high revenue concentration across the sector.

    Source: Lorenzo Valente

    Valente added that he expects the trend to accelerate in the coming months, leading to more mergers and acquisitions, Chapter 11 bankruptcies, project shutdowns and acqui-hires. Despite the shakeout, he described the consolidation as “extremely bullish” for the crypto industry.

    Related: ARK pushes back against a16z’s ‘TradFi wants blockchain, not DeFi’ claim

    Exchange closures add to consolidation narrative

    The comments come as several crypto exchanges have announced plans to wind down operations in recent days, underscoring mounting pressures across parts of the industry.

    Last week, BitMEX announced it would shut down its exchange in September after a strategic review by owner HDR Global Trading. The exchange had recently accelerated the delisting of trading pairs and derivative contracts, citing insufficient trading interest.

    Days later, BitMart announced it would end trading services on Aug. 26 before winding down operations entirely in January 2027. The exchange said the decision followed a review of its operating conditions, market environment and future strategic direction.

    Consolidation has also come through acquisitions. Earlier this month, Bybit launched a locally operated exchange in Indonesia after acquiring a majority stake in local digital asset firm NOBI, expanding its presence in one of Asia’s largest crypto markets.

    Source: BitMEX

    Magazine: The 100x obsession: Fundamentals grow in importance as crypto matures