Blog

  • ‘Hacks’ Stars Hannah Einbinder and Paul W. Downs on the Legacy of ‘Hacks’ and Which Character Needs a Spinoff First

    ‘Hacks’ Stars Hannah Einbinder and Paul W. Downs on the Legacy of ‘Hacks’ and Which Character Needs a Spinoff First

    Hannah Einbinder says working with Gillian Anderson on the new film “Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma” has actually given her a new perspective on the end of “Hacks” and its legacy.

    “Doing all this press with Gillian for the movie, she talks about ‘X-Files’ constantly,” Einbinder tells Variety‘s Awards Circuit Podcast. “She’s asked about it constantly. It’s made me feel like, ‘oh, I’m gonna talk about “Hacks” for the rest of my life!’ I’m so happy that will always be something that I can come back to and meditate on and express gratitude for. When you are a part of something that has a deeply connected base of people who love it, that stays.”

    Meanwhile, given how many photo shoots and events Paul W. Downs and his “Hacks” co-star Megan Stalter seem to show up at, why isn’t there a Jimmy and Kayla spinoff in the works?

    “I would love for it to happen, and I have said this: You know we had a very specific plan for the way we wanted to end the story in the finale,” he says. “It’s such it’s so much pressure to deliver a satisfying ending … so, even to the last minute, even though we had this plan for a long time, we were like, ‘Should we stretch it out? Should we do two half seasons?’ But in the end, I’m so happy we stuck to our guns, and it resonated with people the way that it did. And because of that, I don’t I don’t want anything else to come after. I want that to be the last thing people remember.”

    When grilled about “Jimmy and Kayla,” he adds, “getting to play these characters and having these characters evolve as much as they have over the five seasons has been so gratifying that it’s terrifying to think there won’t be more between the two of us. But I think it would have to be something different.”

    OK … we’re getting somewhere. So what might a “Hacks” spinoff look like? “There’s so many characters in the show that if we could do a universe, I want to see Mayor Jo in her first election. I want to see Marty coming to to Vegas in the ’70s.”

    Einbinder likes the Mayor Jo idea. “‘Better Call Saul’ vibes,” she says. “Her just being a fucking absolute criminal. Are you kidding? I’m in the freaking seats with the popcorn on that one.”

    Give it time. Maybe we’ll wear them down! But for now, we’ve got Downs and Einbinder on this week’s Awards Circuit Podcast, where they talk more about the “Hacks” ending and what they’ve got in store next. Plus, they take the 10 Questions quiz!

    But first, on the Roundtable, Variety TV critic Aramide Tinubu joins us to give some of her summer TV picks and hot takes on the Emmy noms. Listen below!

    He might be a bit biased, but Downs raves about Einbinder’s part in the upcoming slasher film “Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma,” which opens August 7. “I’ll give you the review,” he says. “This is a pull quote now from Variety. Absolutely beautiful, absolutely terrifying and absolutely funny. And Hannah is a revelation. She is such a star. I’m not even kidding. The stuff that she does, her range being on display yet again in this is really impressive.”

    As for Downs, Lucia Aniello and Jen Statsky, the trio has a number of projects in the works — including one in development with Kaley Cuoco — although she’s busy on something else right now, so schedules will have to align for their project. And then the trio also has another project they’re working on for HBO.

    “I can say it’s a it’s a limited series,” he says. “It’s an hourlong limited. I can say that. So it’s a slight tone shift, but there’s definitely going to be humor.”

    Einbinder says she’d be game to join them again for this next project. “I told Paul, Jen and Lucia that I want to be their non-problematic Rob Schneider. I just want to pop up in everything they do forever.”

    Meanwhile, Einbinder says she’s still thinking a lot about her time on “Hacks,” and how she found a video that she recorded for herself in Season 1. Now it feels like a bit of a time capsule: “It was in my trailer, and the sound is pretty muffled, and it’s kind of a shitty video, but I just was kind of reflecting, like kind of a diary, and one of the things that I said was ‘I think these people are going to mean so much to me.’”

    Einbinder’s come a long way in those six years since “Hacks” first became a reality. “Most nights when I get into bed and feel the relief of making it back to my bed at the end of a long day, I go, ‘wow.’ I just am filled with gratitude. This experience has made so much possible for me in every conceivable way. On an emotional level, obviously we have a very strong bond. When I was auditioning for Ava initially, I was opening for other comics on the road. That went away because of COVID, and the job I had before that was working at a coffee shop, and that also went away. I was just really, ‘I actually don’t know what I’m gonna do.’ And so just on every level, [this success] has never been lost on me.”


    10 QUESTIONS WITH HANNAH EINBINDER and PAUL W. DOWNS:

    1. Childhood nickname: Einbinder: “‘Pud,’ short for ‘Pudding.’ My parents called me that.” Downs: “‘Chubb.’ I think it came from my love of pasta and pizza. I think it honestly came from my love of Swiss Miss. I would take Swiss Miss packets with half and half, and I would make like a sludge that I would drink. It was my version of child cocaine, I guess.”

    2. Something you loved as a kid but can’t believe you were into it now: Downs: “I used to kind of collect these, they were basically little figurines that were like a dragon or an Excalibur or a wizard, and they were on amethyst. They were sold at a kiosk at the Rockaway Town Square Mall, and I was into these bizarre — I don’t know what that is. Fantasy figurines. They were also very like Sedona. You know, they were very like hippie figurines. I can’t believe I was so into that” Einbinder: “I have done so much inner child work that I have love and affection for the things that I maybe was into. I took baton. I had a baton unit. I was very into baton at one time. I did baton classes. I learned from a stripper named Heather. Thank you, Heather. She taught baton on the side. She was like, ‘I do flaming baton at my where I dance,’ and we were like, ‘We want to come see you dance, Heather!’ And she was like, ‘It’s not for kids.’”

    3. Go-to Karaoke or sing-in-the-shower song: Einbinder: “‘What’s Up,’ by 4 Non Blondes.” Downs: “‘All I Wanna Do’ by Sheryl Crow. It’s a real crowd pleaser.”

    4. Give me an alternate title for your show: [Not asked]

    5. What’s your secret talent?: Downs: “I can give a good massage.” Einbinder: “I can create a bubble ring underwater. Or a smoke ring. I can do that too. But that’s featured in the show ‘Hacks.’”

    6. Favorite ice cream flavor: Downs: “As a kid, I loved strawberry. Now I want like a like a dark chocolate double fudge chunk.” Einbinder: “Mint chip.”

    7. The one item you couldn’t live without: Einbinder: “Cell phone.” Downs: “I was gonna say toothpaste. You really want toothpaste.”

    8. What TV show in all of history do you wish you were a cast member of?: Einbinder: “‘Sopranos,’ ‘Mad Men.’” Downs: “Some of my favorite shows like ‘Arrested Development’ or ‘Succession’ or ‘Fleabag,’ I don’t know that I want to be on those shows. I think I want to be on ‘Friends.’ I think I would have had a blast.”

    9. Fictional character you most admire: [Not asked]

    10. Your favorite piece of advice: Einbinder: “‘Faster and funnier.’” Downs: “I’ve uttered those words. You know what else I uttered recently, and I’m taking a great piece of advice that Maya Angelou gave to Oprah, which is when someone tells you who they are, believe them the first time. I think that’s a really good piece of advice.”

    Variety’s “Awards Circuit” podcast, hosted by Clayton Davis, Jazz Tangcay, Emily Longeretta and Michael Schneider, who also produces, is your one-stop source for lively conversations about the best in film and television. Each episode, “Awards Circuit” features interviews with top film and TV talent and creatives, discussions and debates about awards races and industry headlines, and much more. Subscribe via Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, Spotify or anywhere you download podcasts.

  • A New Wave Has Begun at Coldcard, One of the Largest Bitcoin Wallet Hacks in Recent Times—The Losses Are Mounting

    A New Wave Has Begun at Coldcard, One of the Largest Bitcoin Wallet Hacks in Recent Times—The Losses Are Mounting

    Galaxy Research announced the detection of a third wave of attacks believed to target addresses created on Coldcard devices. The latest wave reportedly resulted in the withdrawal of 207.7294 $BTC, bringing the total loss to 1,367.05 $BTC, or approximately $88.6 million, across 4,585 addresses.

    According to the research firm, the first two waves of attacks exhibited largely similar on-chain behavior. Both waves saw funds being transferred to a small number of shared collection addresses, P2WPKH addresses being used, and wallets originating from different derivation paths being targeted. The approximately 27-hour interval between the two waves and the similarities in transaction structures suggest that the attacks may have been carried out by the same person or group.

    However, Galaxy Research emphasized that there were differences between the first two waves in terms of transaction fees and “replace-by-fee” signals, therefore it could not be definitively proven that the same attacker was involved.

    The Third Wave May Point to a Different Attacker

    According to Galaxy Research, the third wave of attacks differs from the previous two in almost every measurable behavioral characteristic. Instead of using shared collection addresses in the first attacks, the third wave was found to have created a separate target address for each victim.

    It was stated that the Bitcoins stolen in the third wave were held in P2WSH addresses instead of P2WPKH addresses, and that an average of 6.37 victim addresses were aggregated in each dump. In the first wave of the attack, each transaction targeted only a single victim address. It was also stated that the third wave only scanned addresses in the default derivation path.

    Researchers noted that these changes could stem from the same attacker re-engineering their tools to make on-chain tracing more difficult. However, it was also noted that it is possible a second attacker targeting the same vulnerable key pool emerged after information about the Coldcard vulnerability was made public.

    Galaxy Research reported that on-chain data did not allow for a definitive distinction between these two scenarios. The company stated that while it was certain each attack wave was managed by a single operator, it could not be definitively said that all three waves were linked to the same attacker.

    Related News Michael Saylor: “We Never Said We’d Never Sell Bitcoin”

    Bitcoins in Attacker Addresses Have Not Yet Moved

    According to Galaxy Research’s calculations, the attackers control a total of 1,366.3865 $BTC. It is stated that not all of the final attacker addresses to which these Bitcoins, worth approximately $88.6 million, were transferred have yet spent them on the chain.

    Graph showing the total amount of Bitcoin lost in the attacks. Source: Galaxy Research

    Block-by-block analysis revealed that addresses were dumped en masse during attack waves. The absence of any dumping operations in intermediate blocks within each wave that could be attributed to the attackers indicated that the operations were sent to the network in groups, not continuously.

    It was noted that the losses were mostly concentrated in wallets with balances below 1 $BTC in terms of address count, but addresses with larger balances were decisive in terms of total value. Galaxy Research assessed that this distribution resembled individual users’ own custodial wallets rather than institutional custodial services.

    The study also indicated that the vulnerable Coldcard software was released on March 17, 2021, around block 674,951 of the Bitcoin network. Galaxy Research stated that none of the Bitcoins identified as stolen in the first three waves of attacks were created before this block.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Can SOON crypto sustain its 14% daily gain? If not, what’s next?

    Can SOON crypto sustain its 14% daily gain? If not, what’s next?

    $SOON [$SOON] crypto gained 14% over 24 hours, outperforming a broader market where Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH] traded lower.

    The rally appeared largely leverage-driven, with perpetual traders supplying much of the buying pressure. However, uneven positioning and retail dominance left the move vulnerable to a reversal.

    Why is $SOON price rising?

    Data from CoinGlass shows perpetual market traders on the top cryptocurrency exchanges Binance and OKX have played the key role in driving the surge.

    A Long/Short Ratio above 1 indicates a long bias, while a reading below 1 favors shorts.

    At press time, the ratio stood near 1.5 on Binance and 1.3 on OKX. Both readings reflected stronger bullish positioning among traders on these exchanges.

    Source: CoinGlass

    Together, Binance and OKX accounted for $13.56 million in $SOON’s perpetual Trading Volume. They also held the two largest Open Interest positions, collectively valued at $34.05 million.

    However, the aggregate Long/Short Ratio across centralized exchanges stood at 0.96, indicating a slightly broader short bias.

    Do Funding Rates support $SOON crypto?

    Although aggregate positioning leaned slightly bearish, $SOON’s positive Funding Rate showed that long traders were paying shorts.

    This suggested that bullish traders were willing to pay periodic fees to maintain their leveraged positions.

    Source: CoinGlass

    However, the reading did not prove that most of $SOON’s $41.82 million Open Interest represented long contracts. Further increases in Open Interest and Funding Rates could leave the market vulnerable to an overleveraged unwind.

    On top of that, Spot demand supported the rally over the previous 48 hours. Net buying reached $97,920, while total buying stood near $1.84 million during the same period.

    Retail dominance leaves $SOON’s rally exposed

    The rally’s sustainability hinges on who dominates between whales—who control large capital and tend to hold for much longer—and retail investors, who are quick to sell.

    Data confirms retail traders have driven much of the $SOON rally over the past 24 hours, as the whale-retail delta fell significantly to -0.039, which points to this group holding heavy control over the market.

    Source: CoinGlass

    The risk here, however, is this group may sell at the slightest opportunity, flipping long positions to short and triggering significant liquidations across the market. Overall, while the market leans bullish, traders should approach it with caution.


    Final Summary

    • $SOON’s 14% climb was powered largely by leveraged perpetual traders on Binance and OKX, which together hold the two largest open interest positions at a combined $34.05 million.
    • Retail investors now dominate the rally, with the whale-retail delta at -0.039, leaving the move vulnerable to a quick sell-off.
  • XRP Scam Ring Arrested After Stealing $9M From 71 Investors

    XRP Scam Ring Arrested After Stealing $9M From 71 Investors

    Fake $XRP Platform Vanished After Collecting Investor Funds

    The Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency announced July 30 that investigators had apprehended three people accused of operating a fraudulent $XRP investment platform, according to Korean newspaper Chosun. Authorities allege the group collected approximately 3.4 million $XRP from 71 investors between Oct. 16 and Oct. 23 before closing the website and disappearing.

    The suspects allegedly promoted Fxrpntwork.com through portal blogs, online articles, and Youtube videos while promising guaranteed principal and monthly returns between 1.5% and 1.8%. Investors were instructed to move $XRP from South Korean exchanges through overseas platforms before transferring the assets into wallets controlled by the group.

    Seoul police warned prospective cryptocurrency investors to verify official sources carefully before transferring assets to unfamiliar wallets or unverified platforms:

    “Do not be misled by unverified information on YouTube or other platforms. Verify official sources before investing.”

    Investigators arrested two 29-year-old suspects and plan to refer the case against a 34-year-old alleged accomplice to prosecutors while pursuing another 29-year-old suspect abroad. Police obtained an Interpol Red Notice for the overseas suspect and continued examining additional participants accused of building and promoting the fraudulent website.

    Fraudsters Copied Flare and FXRP Branding

    The alleged operators used the names Flare Network and FXRP to make their platform appear connected to legitimate blockchain infrastructure. Flare’s official FAssets system is designed to represent assets such as $XRP on the Flare network through overcollateralized mechanisms, allowing those tokens to participate in decentralized applications.

    Ripple has warned that cryptocurrency impersonation schemes frequently copy trusted names, logos, videos, websites, and executive identities to create false credibility. Interpol has also identified financial fraud as an increasingly organized cross-border threat, with criminal networks using digital platforms and rapid transfers to move proceeds across jurisdictions before authorities can intervene.

    Guaranteed Returns Remain a Common Crypto Fraud Signal

    Impersonation scams involving $XRP have increasingly relied on counterfeit promotions, fabricated endorsements, and promises that victims will receive more tokens after sending funds.

    Warnings about expanding $XRP impersonation schemes have emphasized that legitimate companies do not request cryptocurrency transfers through unsolicited promotions, particularly when scammers combine familiar branding with urgent instructions or guaranteed returns. A fraud case involving fake “no-risk” cryptocurrency returns further illustrates how guaranteed-profit claims can be used to attract victims.

    FBI data on billions of dollars in cryptocurrency scam losses shows that cryptocurrency investment fraud continues producing substantial losses across borders, often through fake dashboards and fabricated account balances. An international cryptocurrency scam crackdown resulting in 276 arrests also targeted networks accused of moving victims’ assets through layered wallets, exchanges, and overseas financial channels.

    South Korean investigators froze 17.3 billion won in virtual assets shortly after detecting the alleged scheme, although approximately 10 billion won moved during the investigation. Wallet analysis later identified 27.3 billion won in transfers connected to the addresses, prompting authorities to examine whether additional victims and accomplices remain unidentified.

  • XRP $1 Support Under Pressure as August Begins: What Happens Next?

    XRP $1 Support Under Pressure as August Begins: What Happens Next?

    $XRP‘s range trading continues as price chugs near the crucial $1 support. $XRP held above the $1.02 support for all of July, a feat that remained significant and saw it close the month in the green, gaining 2.18%.

    $XRP faced choppy price action in July, albeit price held above the important level of $1. The price tested support in the range between $1.02 and $1.06 during the month, making this a crucial zone to watch. However, as August begins, bears seem to be testing this crucial price zone, seeking to break it.

    The price of $XRP is currently $1.06, performing multiple tests in the $1.05 and $1.06 range within the last 24 hours.

    card

    $XRP recorded its first green month since April when it closed July up 2.18%. The $1.02 support is now being watched, with a decline potentially testing $1.00, a strong support for $XRP price. The positive sign is that $XRP has held above $1.00 so far in 2026. Resistance levels are at the weekly MA 200 and 50 at $1.80 and $1.21, respectively.

    Key XRPL features to land in August

    August may be a noteworthy month for $XRP Ledger upgrades, with five amendments set to arrive in the week ahead.

    According to Jazzi Cooper, RippleX head of product, the upcoming release of xrpld 3.3.0 includes five amendments. These are Confidential MPT, which brings native privacy to Multi-Purpose Tokens (MPTs) on $XRP Ledger; Batch, which enables up to eight transactions across different accounts to execute atomically in a single ledger.

    Permission Delegation allows institutions to delegate narrowly scoped transaction permissions without handing over full signing authority; Sponsored Fees and Reserves allow a sponsor such as a bank, issuer, or platform to pay $XRP transaction fees and account reserves on behalf of another account. Dynamic MPT allows issuers of Multi-Purpose Tokens to define, at issuance, exactly which properties may be updated over time.

    According to Cooper, the xrpld 3.3.0 release is currently anticipated for next week.

  • Paramount Pitches Judge On November Start Of WBD Merger Antitrust Trial, While State AGs & WGA Propose April

    Paramount Pitches Judge On November Start Of WBD Merger Antitrust Trial, While State AGs & WGA Propose April

    Paramount wants a trial to start in November in the antitrust lawsuit brought by a dozen state attorneys general and the Writers Guild America. Not surprisingly, the state AGs and the guild want an April start to the proceedings.

    The sides outlined their proposals ina joint filing Friday, with the ultimate decision on scheduling left to the federal judge in the case, Araceli Martinez-Olguin.

    “The parties have discussed the trial schedule, but they have not reached agreement,” the parties wrote.

    The trial dates are hugely important for the transaction, and even Paramount’s proposed date likely will cost the company hundreds of millions. After September 30, Paramount will be on the hook for about $7 million for every day that the transaction doesn’t close, under an agreement with WBD that was a sweetener to the deal.

    A Paramount spokesperson said, “Our request for a November trial date is more than sufficient to give both sides the time they need to conduct discovery, gather evidence, and prepare for trial. Plaintiffs’ request to delay proceedings until April is nothing more than a stonewalling tactic that goes well beyond the timelines sought in similar prior proceedings and ignores the substantial evidence plaintiffs have already received in this matter. Delay will also harm the many individuals outside this courtroom who will be denied the expanded content offerings and industry stability that a combined Paramount-WBD promises to bring.”

    California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who is leading 12 states in the lawsuit, said in a statement, “Our challenge to the unlawful Warner Bros./Paramount merger is a clean-cut antitrust challenge through and through: it’s about protecting the vibrancy of an industry, the pockets of consumers, and the quality of films and television programs that take center stage in many of our lives. This challenge deserves careful and thorough review and today my office and attorneys general across the country asked the court for a trial date next spring. We are eager to continue to make our case and look forward to a final determination of the schedule by the court.”

    Last week, Paramount said it would not close the merger until June 1, 2027, or until days after the legal issues are resolved, and indicated it wanted to go directly to trial. Its announcement came just days after the judge granted the state AGs a temporary restraining order that prohibited the transaction from closing for 14 days, an order that was later extended to 28 days.

    The company spokeswoman said a trial “on the merits is the best and most direct way for us to prove what we’ve said from the start — this transaction is lawful, pro-competitive, and raises no antitrust concerns.”

    In the filing Friday, Paramount proposed a 12-day trial starting November 4 that would encompass the cases brought by the states and the WGA.

    Paramount also noted that the later date would give the judge “much less time to decide” the case by June, the outside date it had set for the merger to close, as well as time for the company to appeal.

    Among other things, they noted that the DOJ’s antitrust case seeking to block AT&T’s merger with Time Warner went to trial on March 19, 2018, four months after the federal government brought the case. Makan Delrahim, who is Paramount’s chief legal officer, was then the chief of the DOJ’s antitrust division; on the other side was attorney Daniel Petrocelli, representing Time Warner, and now representing WBD in this case.

    The company also noted that Bonta had last week favored a January trial start, but now was proposing a date four months later.

    “Given the stakes of this case, there is no basis and no time to delay for the sake of delay, particularly when delay significantly prejudices Defendants and the Hollywood ecosystem more broadly,” Paramount’s legal team wrote in the filing.

    The company also argued that Paramount and the WGA will have had sufficient time for discovery.

    Paramount’s legal team wrote, “State Plaintiffs had six-plus months before they filed their complaint to conduct unilateral discovery regarding the proposed transaction. State Plaintiffs also had the benefit of waivers granted by Defendants to enable the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to share with State Plaintiffs all information and materials that Defendants produced to the DOJ. In sum, the discovery that State Plaintiffs received many months ago includes over two million documents from more than 80 of Defendants’ employees.”

    The company’s legal team noted that the later date would require them to refile merger materials with the Justice Department, which has already cleared the transaction, and that it would leave the creative community in a period of uncertainty, as Paramount plans to boost production to 30 films per year.

    The state AGs and WGA proposed a start of April 5, 2027, lasting at least 12-15 days, with each plaintiff presenting their cases sequentially.

    The state plaintiffs wrote that extensive discovery is needed, including of “the definition of the relevant product and geographic markets, the nature and scope of harm in those markets, whether expansion by other firms will prevent harm in those markets, and whether the merger will produce verifiable, merger-specific efficiencies sufficient to outweigh harm in those markets.”

    They pointed specifically to areas like Paramount’s assertion that the merger will generate billions in synergies, “a claim that Plaintiff States are entitled to test in discovery, including discovery of Defendants’ integration plans for their merged company.”

    The states noted that Paramount’s document productions “largely cut off” before the merger agreement was signed in February, leaving the plaintiffs with few internal documents about post-closing plans.

    The state AGs wrote, “Defendants’ pre-complaint productions also do nothing to address the need for discovery from third party customers and competitors. Importantly, no depositions of percipient fact witnesses from Defendants or third parties have occurred.”

    The states also contended that their schedule was “reasonable,” claiming that the 402 days from the signing of the merger agreement on February 27 to the proposed trial date “moves this case to trial more rapidly than virtually every merger case in recent history.” The AT&T-Time Warner trial started 513 days after the merger deal was signed, they noted, as opposed to when the DOJ lawsuit was filed. The state AGs also wrote that an April trial would still leave the judge with time to decide the case by June.

    The state AGs also called Paramount’s proposed schedule “one-sided,” arguing, “Their extraordinarily truncated schedule unfairly favors Defendants because they (1) have information Plaintiff States need to prove their case and (2) do not bear the burden of persuasion.”

  • US embassies issue alerts after Trump vows to hit Iran ‘hard’

    US embassies issue alerts after Trump vows to hit Iran ‘hard’

    NewsFeed

    US embassies in the Middle East have warned of a possible escalation after President Trump said the US ‘will be hitting Iran hard’, however as Al Jazeera’s Mike Hanna reports there are no clear signs a strike is imminent.

  • Savannah Guthrie Posts New Message Following Release Of Ransom Notes In Mother’s Kidnapping: “Someone Knows Something”

    Savannah Guthrie Posts New Message Following Release Of Ransom Notes In Mother’s Kidnapping: “Someone Knows Something”

    Savannah Guthrie issued a new plea for information on Saturday, after authorities released two ransom notes received in the days after her mother Nancy’s disappearance six months ago.

    Guthrie wrote on Instagram, “We are begging for help. We are desperate. We need someone to come forward. Someone knows something. Someone suspects something. Someone recognizes the writing in the ransom demand notes. Someone has noticed something different, strange, troubling or just unusual – perhaps with someone they deeply love. Perhaps they are afraid to come forward. Perhaps they are conflicted. Perhaps they are angry or upset for being in this situation. There is a way out – to tell what you know. You can do so anonymously. The reward is available. There is a way to end this situation and do the right thing.”

    The Today co-host added, “We are real people, facing real grief, doing the best we can, and counting our many blessings along the way – most especially the prayers and love from good people, which we feel deeply. We need your prayers, we need your kindness. We need the good to be stronger than the evil. If you are following this story for entertainment or for profit, you are not on her side – you are part of the harm perpetrated against her.”

    Nancy Guthrie was last seen on Jan. 31, after she was dropped off at her Tucson area home.

    On Friday, the Pima County Sheriff released two ransom notes allegedly sent by her kidnappers, an effort to generate new leads in the case.

    The first note, sent to Tucson news outlet KOLD-TV a day after her disappearance, was addressed to Savannah Guthrie, and said that she was “safe but scared” and would not be released until payment, $4 million in bitcoin, is received, according to the full messages released by the Pima County Sheriff’s Department and the FBI Phoenix Field Office. The note said that she would be held for a maximum of seven days.

    The second note, sent Feb. 6, also to KOLD, stated that Guthrie died shortly after she was taken.

    That note read, “We did not fully grasp the seriousness of her physical condition. We never intended to hurt her, that was not our intention. She perished shortly after she was taken. We believe it was heart related. She is buried in nature now. Nothing you could have done could have changed the outcome. We want your family to know this and hope you all can find peace. We are truly sorry.”

    Anyone with information is urged to contact 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324). The Guthrie family is also offering a $1 million reward for the return of their mother.

    Savannah Guthrie’s complete message is below:

  • Tired of Your Apple Watch Dying Before Bedtime? These 5 Battery-Saving Tips Keep Mine Going All Day

    Tired of Your Apple Watch Dying Before Bedtime? These 5 Battery-Saving Tips Keep Mine Going All Day

    Apple’s battery estimates when it comes to the Apple Watch are typically conservative. For example, the company only predicts about 24 hours for the Series 11, but we got 43 hours out of it in testing. Still, that all depends on how often you use it and what you’re doing with it. During a typical day, my Series 10 will get me through a full day, but it can run low sooner if it’s a day of heavy usage. To keep my watch going longer, whether I’m using it to track sleep or wearing it during a long travel day, these tricks always help.


    How to Check Battery Life

    Don’t know how much of a charge is left? You can check battery life in several ways. Press the Side button on your watch to display the Control Center. The battery icon shows the current percentage of the remaining charge. To get more details, go to Settings, swipe down, and select Battery. The screen displays the current level, the levels from the past day to today, and the level when you last charged it.

    Check the battery level

    (Credit: PCMag / Apple)


    1. Turn on Low Power Mode

    Just like your iPhone, your Apple Watch has a low-power mode that aims to preserve battery life by disabling or limiting certain features and settings. This mode turns off the following:

    • Background blood oxygen and heart rate measurements, including those during sleep.

    • Collection of heart data for hypertension notifications.

    • Heart rate notifications for irregular rhythm, high heart rate, and low heart rate.

    • Always On display.

    • Gestures for double-tap and wrist flick.

    • Reminders to start a workout.

    • The time in daylight view.

    This can also affect phone calls and Siri requests. Background app refreshes, complications, and Live Activities will occur less frequently. Additionally, some animations and scrolling might appear less smooth.

    Turn on Low Power Mode from Control Center

    (Credit: PCMag / Apple)

    Your watch will prompt you to turn on Lower Power Mode when your battery charge drops to a certain level, but you can also enable it manually at any time. To do this on your watch, press the Side button to launch Control Center and tap Battery percentage > Low Power Mode (or Settings > Battery > Low Power Mode) and then tap Turn On to enable it until you turn it off or Turn On For to turn it on for one, two, or three days.

    A yellow icon appears at the top of the screen to indicate when you’re in Low Power Mode. To turn off this mode, just return to the battery settings screen and tap the Lower Power Mode On button or turn off the switch next to Lower Power Mode.

    Turn off Low Power Mode

    (Credit: PCMag / Apple)


    2. Disable the Always On Display

    The Always On Display keeps the watch screen on even when your wrist is down or you’re not looking at it. This feature is enabled by default on the Apple Watch Series 5 and later, the Apple Watch SE 3, and the Apple Watch Ultra and later. Though this sounds handy, it can drain your battery. Low Power Mode automatically turns this off, but you can also turn it off separately if you don’t want to impact the other features and settings. Go to Settings > Display & Brightness > Always On and turn off the switch.

    Recommended by Our Editors

    Disable the Always On Display

    (Credit: PCMag / Apple)


    3. Stop Wake on Wrist Raise

    By default, your Apple Watch turns on and displays the screen when you raise your wrist. But like other features, this one can also eat into your battery charge. To disable it, go to Settings > Display & Brightness and turn off the Wake on Wrist Raise feature. To view the screen with this option turned off, just tap on it. You can also control how long the screen stays on when you tap it. Select the Wake Duration option, and you’re able to set the screen to stay awake for 15 seconds or 70 seconds.

    Stop the Display from Turning On When You Raise Your Wrist

    (Credit: PCMag / Apple)


    4. Turn Off Battery Optimization

    With a feature called battery optimization, your Apple Watch analyzes your daily charging routine to improve your overall battery life. Some Apple Watches also offer an optimized charging limit that determines when your device should stop charging. But these options can reduce the time your watch runs between charges. To turn these off, at least temporarily, go to Settings > Battery > Battery Health. You can then turn off Optimized Battery Charging or Optimized Charge Limit. You can then opt to turn these off completely or only until tomorrow.

    Turn Off Battery Optimization

    (Credit: PCMag / Apple)


    5. Turn on Airplane Mode

    If you’re in an area where you don’t need connectivity, you can turn on Airplane mode just as on your iPhone. Doing so helps preserve the battery charge. But here, you also have a couple of options. Go to Settings > Airplane Mode, then turn it off to disable Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. This will sever the Bluetooth connection between your watch and iPhone. For that reason, you may want to just turn off Wi-Fi and leave Bluetooth enabled.

    Turn On Airplane Mode

    (Credit: PCMag / Apple)

    About Our Expert

  • Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman Make Surprise Appearance at ‘Practical Magic’ Screening

    Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman Make Surprise Appearance at ‘Practical Magic’ Screening

    Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman are getting an early start on spooky season.

    The duo made a surprise appearance at a Cinespia screening of their beloved 1998 movie Practical Magic on Saturday night, arriving to screams from the crowd at Hollywood Forever Cemetery.

    “[Practical Magic] is [the] perfect movie to show at a cemetery,” Bullock said to the crowd, as Kidman added, “Thank you for all your support for getting this second film made that’s coming to you very soon.” They also introduced the sequel’s new additions in Joey King and Maisie Williams, sharing a toast among themselves and the audience.

    The night helped stir up excitement ahead of the upcoming sequel, which sees Bullock and Kidman reprising their roles as orphaned sisters Sally and Gillian Owens. In the original, the two — raised by their witch aunts Aunt Jet (Dianne Wiest) and Aunt Franny (Stockard Channing) — embrace witchcraft after avoiding it most of their lives. The sisters work to learn how to use their powers to ward off a curse that threatens women in the family from finding love, and leaves men they fall in love with dead.

    In Practical Magic 2, set 25 years later, Bullock’s character now has two daughters — played by King and Williams — who have their own witchy abilities. King’s character discovers dark family secrets that plunge the Owens family into a crisis, and the women must confront the dark curse that threatens to unravel them once and for all.

    Wiest and Channing have also returned for the follow-up, alongside other new additions Lee Pace, Xolo Maridueña and Solly McLeod.

    The Perfect Couple‘s Susanne Bier directed the film, which hits theaters Sept. 11. Bullock and Kidman are producing the sequel alongside Denise Di Novi, who was also behind the 1998 movie. Practical Magic is also returning to theaters for one night only, on Aug. 11, in preparation for the new film.