Actors Benedict Cumberbatch, Alan Cumming and Benedict Wong have penned an op-ed in The Guardian calling for the U.K. to block the Paramount–Warner Bros. merger, arguing that the deal threatens to inflict “immense harm on the British public.”
The U.K. culture secretary Lisa Nandy — who has remained in her post amid a cabinet reshuffle with new Prime Minister Andy Burnham taking office — has previously said she was “minded to intervene” in the $111 billion mega-deal that, if successful, will undoubtedly change not just Hollywood, but the global film and TV industry.
Among a host of issues, the actors cite concerns over the livelihoods of British film and TV crews, independent film financing, and losing public service broadcaster Channel 5 to Hollywood ownership.
“As actors and public figures who have spent our careers in the arts in Britain — working with British crews, on British stages and sets — we have a responsibility to the public who support, enjoy and consume the art we make,” wrote the famed Marvel actors (Cumberbatch and Wong), as well as Cummng (The Traitors), on Monday in a piece titled “A TV and cinema calamity could be disastrous for what you watch and what you know. Act now to stop that.”
“The U.K. is being threatened by a media merger that would harm our workers, our culture and the public — but we can stop it.” They mention that they are encouraged by Nandy’s statements that she wants to investigate the threat to public interest, and acknowledge that she is not acting alone. This month, 12 U.S. states, led by California, sued in federal court to block the merger, warning that it would “raise prices, shrink the number of films made and degrade the quality of what audiences see,” said the men. And over the weekend, news broke that Larry Ellison’s Paramount agreed not to close the takeover until the court decides whether the deal violates antitrust laws.
“Their lawsuit confirms the danger; it cannot, however, do the U.K.’s work for it,” continue Cumberbatch, Cumming and Wong, who add that the EU has conditionally backed the merger and makes its own decisions. “The fight against this merger now runs on two fronts, and Nandy commands one of them. Should her department decide to intervene, it may prove one of the most important decisions any culture secretary has taken for U.K. film, television and media in a generation,” they explain.
“This is why. We have spent our lives working in this industry. We know what it looks like from the inside: the sound stages at Leavesden [studio], the crews who move from production to production, the editors and camera operators and costume designers whose names scroll past in the credits at the end of a film. These are our cherished friends and colleagues, who create the shows we all love, who produce the news that educates the public and film the sport events we enjoy together,” write the actors.
The men say that U.K. film and TV are not just “images on your screens; they are lives and livelihoods of thousands of workers and families, whose work supports local economies.” They cite buoying figures, such as the 180,000 jobs supported through the industry and the £6.8 billion production spend reported last year. “It is one of the things the U.K. still does better than almost anyone, and a cultural heritage we must protect,” they say.
They add that they have watched “with growing alarm” what consolidation does to the “breadth and depth of the work we produce,” before recognizing that independent film acquisitions at the leading independent film festival, Sundance, fell by half between 2019 and 2025. “Award-winning documentaries – films that won Oscars and topped festival juries – have struggled to find commercial distribution because they touched subjects the remaining handful of buyers found inconvenient. Every merger of this kind narrows the funnel through which stories can reach audiences.”
To service Warner Bros.’ estimated $84 billion in debt, executives have promised investors around $6bn in “synergies,” Cumberbatch, Cumming and Wong mention. “In plain English, that means redundancies, cancelled productions, fewer films commissioned and fewer risks taken,” they add.
“That is precisely what makes the Paramount-WBD merger so dangerous,” they write, adding that it has happened so many times before, such as Discovery’s merging with WarnerMedia in 2022, which led to the shelving of finished films and thousands of job losses, or Skydance’s merger with Paramount last year when around 2,000 people were laid off.
They admit they are extremely concerned about Paramount’s acquisition of Channel 5, one of the U.K.’s public service broadcasters, as well as CNN International. “The CNN and CBS news archives [are] among the world’s most important broadcast news collections, with more than 4.25m videos, images and media spanning nearly half a century of history. If one commercially interested owner controls access to both, they control the raw material of our historical memory… Fold those newsrooms into a single company, and one boardroom’s commercial anxieties — or political debts — determine what millions of people see and what they never learn existed.”
“And we know something about this particular proprietor’s intentions. Paramount’s chief executive reportedly told Donald Trump that he would make ‘sweeping changes’ to CNN if the deal went through,” they add.
“Actors are often told to stay out of legal arguments,” write Cumberbatch, Cumming and Wong. “We understand the instinct. But we have spent our lives on enough U.K. sets, worked alongside enough U.K. crews and watched enough brilliant work from the U.K. struggle to find a buyer to know that this is not someone else’s argument. It is ours.”
