Blog

  • Shaq Debuts First True Crime Docuseries ‘Game Day Murders’: Where to Watch the Six-Parter Online

    Shaq Debuts First True Crime Docuseries ‘Game Day Murders’: Where to Watch the Six-Parter Online

    If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, The Hollywood Reporter may receive an affiliate commission.

    Shaquille O’Neal executive produces ID’s newest true crime offering, a limited series that resurfaces six of the most shocking murders in sports history. Premiering on July 27, and airing over six consecutive Mondays at 10 p.m. PT/ET, Game Day Murders can also be livestreamed on any TV streaming service that carries Investigation Discovery (ID), namely DirecTV (with a five-day free trial), Philo (with a seven-day free trial), Sling and Hulu + Live TV.

    Episodes from the Shaq-produced six-parter will also become available on HBO Max, however the streamer does not offer a free trial period.

    At a Glance: How to Watch Game Day Murders

    • Premiere: Monday, July 27, 10 p.m. PT/ET
    • Episode release schedule: Mondays, 10 p.m. PT/ET (for six consecutive weeks)
    • Channel: Investigation Discovery (ID)
    • Stream live online: DirecTV, Philo, Sling, Hulu + Live TV
    • Stream on-demand: HBO Max

    Game Day Murders Episode Schedule

    • Episode one (July 27) Subject: Patrick Dennehy
    • Episode two (Aug. 3) Subject: Mike Danton
    • Episode three (Aug. 10) Subject: Lorenzen Wright
    • Episode four (Aug. 17) Subject: Troy Causey
    • Episode five (Aug. 24) Subject: Dernell Stenson
    • Episode six (Aug. 31) Subject: Sean Taylor

    Where to Watch Game Day Murders: Air Date, Time

    Game Day Murders airs weekly on ID at 10 p.m. PT/ET, beginning with the premiere on Monday, July 27, 2026.

    Where to Stream Game Day Murders Online

    Since Game Day Murders airs on Investigation Discovery (ID), it will also be available to watch live on any streaming service that carries the network, including DirecTV (with a five-day free trial), Philo (with a seven-day free trial), Sling and Hulu + Live TV. Episodes will also become available on HBO Max, however the streamer does not offer a free trial period through its site.

    More on each live TV streaming option — and their new subscriber discounts — below.

    Five-day free trial; packages from $19.99 per month

    ID is included in any of DirecTV’s signature packages: Entertainment, Choice, Ultimate or Premier. Plus, DirecTV offers a five-day free trial for its streaming service, meaning new subscribers can tune in at no cost for a limited time.

    Learn more about each plan option, including how to build your own channel lineup (starting at just $19.99 per month), at directv.com.

    Philo

    Seven-day free trial; packages from $25 per month

    Watch ID on Philo, one of the most affordable cable alternatives. Following the Essential plan’s seven-day free trial period, a subscription costs just $25 per month for 70-plus channels.

    Plans from $4.99 per day or $19.99 per month

    ID is included in both Sling’s Blue Plan, from $45.99 per month, and Sling’s Orange Plan, from $45.99 per month or $4.99 per day.

    For the best bang for your buck, opt for Sling’s Orange & Blue plan, from $60.99 per month, which combines the offerings of both individual packages at a reduced price. Visit Sling.com to check station availability and package options, starting as low as $4.99 per day or $19.99 per month.

    Three-day free trial; packages from $89.99 per month

    Watch Investigation Discovery for free with a three-day trial to Hulu + Live TV. Subscriptions come bundled with Disney+ and ESPN+, and start at $89.99 per month.

  • ‘Bold Voice of Contemporary Horror’ Comic-Con Panelists Predict the Four Biggest Upcoming Trends in Genre Filmmaking

    ‘Bold Voice of Contemporary Horror’ Comic-Con Panelists Predict the Four Biggest Upcoming Trends in Genre Filmmaking

    Horror is red-hot at the box office, but what is up next for the genre?

    Ideas flowed freely at the San Diego Comic-Con panel for Bold Voice of Contemporary Horror: Tenth Anniversary Edition, which took place on July 24. Panelists included both actors and behind-the-camera talent, including Dan Stevens, star of AMC series “The Terror”; Deborah Ann Woll, star of Shudder’s upcoming thriller “The Cycle”; director Zachary Wigon, who helmed Bleecker Street’s “Victorian Psycho,” which debuted during this year’s Cannes Film Festival; and Dave Boyle, who directed SXSW audience award winner “Never After Dark.” The discussion was moderated by Michael Lerman, the co-founder and director of film programming at the genre-based Overlook Film Festival, and was curated by convention mainstay Rachel Walker, who founded the panel in 2015.

    What were their thoughts and theories? Read more below.

    Keeping audiences on their toes by not being boxed into one type of genre.

    Touching on different tones is a great way to keep viewers discombobulated and primed for a scare.

    “I mentioned ‘The Descent’ as being one of my favorite movies. Part of the reason for that is that it shifts,” Woll said. “You’re not always quite sure what kind of horror movie you’re in. Is it a psychological thriller? Is it a survivalist thriller? Is it a creature feature? To me, films that can play with genre in that sense are often the most engaging. When I read this script [for ‘The Cycle’], that immediately made me say, ‘I have to do this.’”

    Bring in ideas from other types of storytelling, even if they’re not fully reflected in the final work.

    Creatives should take from everything they’ve ever worked on — even if it doesn’t immediately seem transferable.

    “I think that the thing that really prepared me to jump into the genre was working on action, just because of how precise and communicative you have to be,” Boyle said. “There are so many moving pieces, so many things to think about and keep track of. Working in Japan for the first time, it’s interesting; Japanese scripts leave half the page blank. Then the director actually draws in the cuts where each cut is gonna happen, so that you have a real sense of how the movie’s going to come together, and there’s a real precision to it if you use that system and lean into it. That’s what prepared me to jump into my favorite genre, which is horror.”

    Horror mixed with humor continues to be on the rise.

    This goes even beyond the influx of funny directors like Zach Cregger and Curry Barker making their mark on the industry.

    “Something I’m pleased to see spreading at the moment is horror with more humor attached,” Stevens said. “I find that humor is so powerful in horror and can often be overlooked. It’s sometimes a scary word when you mention that to producers: ‘I’d like to bring some humor into this.’ ‘It’s not a comedy.’ ‘I know it’s not a comedy, but by bringing some humor in, by bringing elements of humor, you bring in humanity, which I think exists in even the most batshit of situations.’ That can really ground a story sometimes. I’ve really enjoyed seeing a proliferation of those kinds of movies recently.”

    Revel in withholding some information from the audience to make for even bigger payoffs.

    Conjure up interest by dropping some clues that don’t get solved right away.

    “I feel like horror is a subgenre of mystery,” Wigon said. “When I think about horror storytelling, it’s almost like you have a patchwork quilt, and you can’t see what’s in any of the patches at the beginning of the movie. Then as it goes along, you start to reveal that this is one little patch, that’s one little patch, and you’re creating mystery because the audience doesn’t understand how these patches connect to one another, and that’s the game that everybody’s playing. Then as it goes along, you start to realize that you’ve been looking at one image the whole film, and the pleasure is in seeing how these seemingly disparate pieces of information come to connect.”

    Watch the new trailer for “The Cycle,” which debuted during the panel, below.

  • Why Did the Shiba Inu (SHIB) Price Suddenly Spike? What Will Happen Next?

    Why Did the Shiba Inu (SHIB) Price Suddenly Spike? What Will Happen Next?

    Cryptocurrency analytics company Santiment has analyzed Shiba Inu ($SHIB), which has seen a significant increase in volatility recently. According to the company’s data, the price of $SHIB rose by 37 percent in two days, but quickly gave back some of its gains.

    Santiment reported that social media interest in Shiba Inu also increased significantly during the rally. $SHIB’s social dominance reached 0.084%, its highest level since April 2nd. However, the company noted that investor interest peaked during a period when price movement began to weaken.

    The chart shows the increase in $SHIB price.

    On-chain data also indicated that large investors may have viewed the rise as a selling opportunity. 52 whale transactions occurred in $SHIB in a single day, the highest daily level recorded since March 31st.

    Related News Attention: We’re Entering a Critical Week – Numerous Economic Developments and Altcoin Events Ahead – Here’s a Day-by-Day, Hour-by-Hour List

    According to Santiment, the increase in whale transactions suggests that large investors may have reduced their $SHIB positions by realizing profits as the price rose. In contrast, individual investors are believed to have entered the market later.

    The company stated that the surge in social media interest following the sharp rise indicates that small investors bought under the FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) effect as the price approached its peak. This may have provided whales with the necessary liquidity to reduce their positions.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Sean Astin Says ‘I Had to Sell My House’ During ‘Lord of the Rings’ Era Because $250,000 Payday Was So Low: ‘I Negotiated Such a Small Amount on the Trilogy’

    Sean Astin Says ‘I Had to Sell My House’ During ‘Lord of the Rings’ Era Because $250,000 Payday Was So Low: ‘I Negotiated Such a Small Amount on the Trilogy’

    Sean Astin said in a new interview with The Guardian that he was forced to sell his house amid “The Lord of the Rings” fame in the early 2000s because he negotiated such a small salary to play Samwise Gamgee in Peter Jackson’s landmark movie trilogy. The reveal may come as a shock to fans considering the “Rings” movies were cultural phenomenons that grossed $2.9 billion at the worldwide box office between 2001 and 2003.

    “I was not prepared for that level of visibility and access,” Astin told the publication. “And there was a disconnect between the attention that I was getting and how much money we had. It was not a lot of money! In fact, I had to sell my house because I negotiated such a small amount on the trilogy.”

    Astin noted that he is “very comfortable financially now,” but that wasn’t the case when “The Lord of the Rings” was dominating box office charts. Peter Jackson and the team behind the “Rings” trilogy famously shot all three movies at once, meaning there was no opportunity for the cast to renegotiate their salaries based of the success of each installment.

    “Because we weren’t making one movie and then renegotiating a contract for the next, it wasn’t the sort of lucrative scenario that you could sort of rest easy for the rest of your life,” Astin’s “Rings” co-star Elijah Wood told Business Insider last year. Wood noted that New Line Cinema took a “real gamble” filming all three movies at once. To mitigate financial risk, the ensemble cast was offered “not massive salaries,” the Frodo actor said.

    “The benefit of that was that we were also signing up for something that was going to be a part of our lives forever,” Wood added at the time.

    Astin previously revealed that he earned around “$75,000 a movie,” brining his total “Rings” salary to around $250,000. Co-star Orlando Bloom (who played Legolas) said in a 2019 interview on “The Howard Stern Show” that he was paid just $175,000 for the trilogy.

    “The Lord of the Rings” franchise is currently developing its big screen return courtesy of “The Hunt for Gollum,” which Andy Serkis is currently directing, and a new movie co-written by Stephen Colbert. Astin is not confirmed yet to reprise his role in either project, but he will certainly fight for better pay if he is, telling The Guardian: “Goddamn right.”

  • Searchable NYC Property Database Puts Wealthy Residents at Risk, Critics Warn

    Searchable NYC Property Database Puts Wealthy Residents at Risk, Critics Warn

    In brief

    • A searchable database built from New York City’s public property records has sparked backlash.
    • Crypto executives say organizing public records into a searchable tool increases security risks.
    • Critics point to a rise in violent attacks targeting cryptocurrency holders.

    A searchable database built from New York City’s public property assessment records is drawing backlash from prominent figures in the crypto industry, who argue that making the information easier to search effectively creates a directory of wealthy property owners and could expose them to physical danger.

    The controversy centers on data published by the New York City Department of Finance, which annually releases assessed values used to calculate property taxes for every property in the city. The agency’s FY2027 assessment roll, supplemental market value data, and property tax guides are publicly available through the city’s Open Data portal.

    Critics on X said the issue is not that the records are public, but that they have been aggregated and organized into a searchable database that makes identifying owners of expensive properties far easier.

    Uniswap founder Hayden Adams called it “the worst mass doxxing I’ve ever seen,” saying the database listed nearly every unit in some luxury apartment buildings, including primary residences of people he knows. He argued the project cast too wide a net and called it “incredibly dangerous.”

    “Not only were their units listed, but nearly every unit in the entire building was listed,” Adams wrote. “They clearly took an incredibly expansive view of ‘could be’ and just doxxed a huge percentage of all expensive apartments in New York City.”

    Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz called the database “unsettling” and said it crossed a line by transforming scattered public records into a centralized resource that effectively singled out wealthy individuals.

    “While this data was largely public prior to this in a messy way they have cleaned it, organized it, singled out ‘the rich,’ and mass distributed it only the 50th sign this year of privacy continuing to become scarcer,” he wrote.

    Castle Island Ventures partner Nic Carter warned that an easily searchable database of affluent property owners could make potential victims easier to identify, pointing to recent crypto-related kidnappings and violent attacks in Europe.

    “So this is a list of wealthy people and their addresses. As we’ve seen in France and Sweden this leads to crypto kidnappings, torturings and murders,” Carter wrote on X. “Yes real estate records are semi public but this is an easily searchable database and target list.”

    The criticism comes as physical or “wrench” attacks targeting cryptocurrency holders continue to rise, with incidents including kidnappings, torture, home invasions, and sexual assaults.

    In February, blockchain security firm CertiK reported 72 verified crypto “wrench attacks” worldwide in 2025, up 75% from the previous year and resulting in more than $40.9 million in losses.

    In April, French authorities charged 88 suspects, including more than 10 minors, in a sweeping crackdown on violent crypto kidnappings. In May, U.S. prosecutors indicted three men accused of carrying out a series of armed home invasions across California that allegedly stole millions of dollars in cryptocurrency. In June, two Texas brothers pleaded guilty to kidnapping a Minnesota family and forcing the victims to transfer more than $8 million in crypto.

    By July, CertiK said attackers had already carried out 52 verified crypto “wrench attacks” in the first half of 2026, with recorded financial exposure surging nearly twelvefold year over year to $124 million.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • How to Stream Shark Week Live Online Without Cable

    How to Stream Shark Week Live Online Without Cable

    If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, Variety may receive an affiliate commission.

    Shark Week has officially returned, bringing another frenzy of great whites, makos and other underwater predators to Discovery Channel.

    The network’s annual programming event kicked off Sunday, July 26, and runs through Saturday, Aug. 1, with new specials airing nightly beginning at 8 p.m. ET. Cord-cutters can watch Shark Week live online through Sling TV, which carries Discovery Channel as part of its Sling Blue and Sling Orange + Blue packages.

    Sling Blue includes more than 40 live channels and allows subscribers to stream on as many as three devices simultaneously. The service also comes with 50 hours of cloud DVR storage, making it possible to record Shark Week specials and watch them later.

    Viewers who miss the live broadcasts can also add Discovery+ through Sling. Discovery+ is available in an ad-supported plan for $5.99 per month or an ad-free plan for $9.99 per month, with Shark Week programming available to watch on demand.

    This year marks the 38th edition of Shark Week, with Discovery rolling out 20 new specials focused on shark behavior, attacks, conservation and ocean science. The lineup opened with “K-Pop Shark Heroes,” featuring comedian Ken Jeong and singer Rei Ami on a mission to challenge misconceptions about sharks across East Asia.

    Other highlights include “Air Jaws: Red, White and Breach,” which investigates great white sharks breaching along the U.S. coastline, and “Invasion of the Mega Sharks,” following researchers as they search for a potentially record-breaking great white off Nova Scotia.

    Later in the week, “Jurassic Sharks” uses CGI and real-world expeditions to examine prehistoric species, while “Jaws vs Orca” explores the growing evidence that killer whales are hunting great whites. “How to Train a Great White” tests whether the predators can learn and respond to cues, and “Ultimate Shark Dive” follows high diver Molly Carlson as she attempts a helicopter jump into a narrow shark cage.

    The week concludes Aug. 1 with “Great White Highway,” about the increasing number of great whites traveling along the East Coast, followed by “Thresher Shark: Stun to Kill,” which examines how thresher sharks use their powerful tails to incapacitate prey.

    Stream Shark Week on Sling TV.

  • Unreleased footage reveals Lindsey Graham’s push for war on Iran

    Unreleased footage reveals Lindsey Graham’s push for war on Iran

    NewsFeed

    “Look what we’ve done here. I almost cried.” Unreleased documentary footage shows late US Senator Lindsey Graham celebrating the war on Iran, saying it was ‘the best thing’ he had ever done and revealing he had pushed for military action for years.

  • Clarity Act talks enter final stretch as GOP seeks Democratic votes

    Senate Republicans are seeking Democratic support for the Clarity Act as lawmakers consider starting a floor process before the August recess.

    Clarity Act faces a 60-vote Senate test

    Crypto industry groups hope Thune will begin the floor process by filing cloture on a motion to proceed, according to a Crypto in America report.

    A cloture filing would typically set up a vote two Senate session days later. At least 60 senators would need to support the motion before the chamber could begin debating whether to take up the bill.

    If the Senate invokes cloture, lawmakers could spend as many as 30 hours debating the motion before voting on whether to proceed to the legislation itself. That process would not guarantee the Clarity Act’s passage but would move the bill closer to a full floor debate.

    Republicans hold 53 Senate seats, leaving them dependent on Democratic votes even if nearly every GOP senator supports the measure. Senator Mitch McConnell is also expected to remain absent, while Republican Senators Josh Hawley and Rand Paul have not confirmed their positions.

    Both senators voted against the GENIUS Act in 2025, adding uncertainty to the Republican vote count.

    Democratic concerns threaten the floor push

    Seven Democratic senators said the updated Clarity Act text released last week “fell short” of their expectations. Their concerns include political ethics, consumer protection, illicit finance, market integrity and the regulation of decentralized finance.

    Senator Thom Tillis has been leading bipartisan negotiations over stronger ethics rules. The North Carolina Republican has called for provisions that go beyond the proposal agreed to by the White House and other GOP lawmakers.

    The White House-backed language would restrict senior elected officials from issuing or sponsoring certain digital assets. However, some Democrats have questioned whether relying on the Department of Justice to enforce the restrictions would provide sufficient oversight.

    Senators Catherine Cortez Masto and Mark Warner have also tied their potential support to stronger safeguards against crypto-related financial crime.

    Without an agreement, Republicans are unlikely to secure the 60 votes required to move forward. The narrow GOP margin also means that any Republican defections would increase the number of Democratic votes needed.

    Police endorsement removes one DeFi obstacle

    The National Fraternal Order of Police endorsed the revised Clarity Act on Friday after lawmakers addressed its concerns about the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act.

    The BRCA provisions would protect certain non-custodial software developers from having to register as money transmitters. Law enforcement groups had previously warned that broad protections could make it harder to prosecute crimes involving digital assets.

    The police union now believes the revised language preserves investigators’ authority while providing legal protection for developers who do not control customer assets. Its endorsement could help ease concerns among Democrats focused on illicit finance and enforcement.

    However, the support does not resolve broader disagreements over when a DeFi service should qualify as decentralized and when people controlling a protocol should face financial regulations.

    SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce separately warned that moving a financial product onchain does not automatically place it outside federal securities law. She said actively managed crypto vaults could resemble investment funds when third parties decide how users’ assets are allocated.

    “When you have a third party involved in deciding how different assets are being allocated and invested, that’s really a situation where you have to start asking: Do the securities laws apply?”

    August recess leaves little time for a deal

    Senators are scheduled to leave Washington on August 7, giving negotiators a limited window to settle the remaining disputes and start the floor process.

    Thune said last week that he did not expect the Clarity Act to pass before the break. However, Senate leaders have reportedly discussed keeping lawmakers in Washington during the first few days of the recess if enough votes can be secured.

    The bill would establish a federal market structure for digital assets and clarify the roles of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Failure to reach a bipartisan agreement before the recess could push further action into a more difficult election-year calendar.

    US Crypto Regulations — Read the full US Regulation Hub for the latest on SEC enforcement, IRS crypto tax rules, and pending legislation.

  • Inside The Room At The Rescheduled WHCA Dinner As Donald Trump Tried Rickles-Like Rally Shtick But Was Met With The Sounds Of Silence

    Inside The Room At The Rescheduled WHCA Dinner As Donald Trump Tried Rickles-Like Rally Shtick But Was Met With The Sounds Of Silence

    Inside the Waldorf Astoria on Friday evening, President Donald Trump took to the stage at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner and tried out some Don Rickles-like shtick, interspersed it with some of his greatest rally hits and fixated on some of his obsessions, including his plans for a White House ballroom.

    What stood out during his one-hour-and-two minute remarks, though, was the silence in the crowd: many jokes didn’t land, he meandered into asides and veered into insider-ish attacks that likely went well over the heads of the TV audience. Much of what he said wasn’t humor, in contrast to the tightly scripted routines of his predecessors, but akin to a fever dream from someone who has spent a bit too much time watching right-wing TV.

    At about 45 minutes in, guests were looking at their phones and fidgeting in their seats. I looked around and locked eyes with a man who gave a brief yawn. It was Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary.

    The length of Trump’s remarks were a reminder of one of Johnny Carson’s quips from the Oscars decades ago: “Welcome to two hours of sparkling entertainment spread over a four-hour show.” It should be noted that Trump’s weaving from topic to topic included a riff on the Academy Awards and how they have gotten too anti-Trump, but even that didn’t get much of a response.

    The president did deliver some funny lines, including quips about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: “I hope that everyone finally got to enjoy their entire, very delicious beef tenderloin, very special beef. And I want you all to know that Bobby Kennedy, who’s right here, personally ran over the cow in his car.”

    Trump also revealed that he still counts how many front-page stories he gets in the New York Times, and gave some practical guidance for reporters who have his phone number and want to call him directly, and why he answers some of them. “I always find that when you don’t speak to the press, you always get a bad story. When you do speak to the press, you have a shot at a good story.”

    Yet in a room full of journalists, Trump’s attacks on figures like CNN’s Kaitlan Collins were met with stone-faces from those who were well aware their reactions could be caught on C-SPAN cameras. His personal insults, ranging from Adam Schiff having a pencil neck to Chris Christie’s weight to Bruce Springsteen’s aged face, also were repeats of various Truth Social posts.

    The event, in the Waldorf Astoria ballroom, was in a much smaller venue than the Washington Hilton, making it more intimate and putting many attendees face-to-face with Trump’s top advisers and members of his cabinet including Stephen Miller, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. With a much smaller crowd, and no pre-event receptions, the enhanced security generally moved briskly.

    There were standout moments during other parts of the evening. This was the rescheduled dinner after April’s event was stopped by an apparent assassination attempt on the president, as a gunman breached security and the sounds of gunfire sent the thousands of attendees at the Washington Hilton to the floor. The WHCA paid tribute to the Secret Service officer, Victor Gonzales, who helped stop the gunman, as well as the Washington Hilton staff.

    WHCA president Weijia Jiang, White House correspondent for CBS News, gave a very personal and heartfelt speech about her journey, having been born in China, raised in Appalachian coal country and, inspired by Connie Chung, landing in the “Oval Office to ask questions of the president of the United States.”

    President Donald Trump, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt (L), and White House Correspondents Association President Weijia Jiang (R) attend the re-scheduled White House Correspondents Dinner in the Presidential Ballroom at the Waldorf Astoria on July 24, 2026 in Washington, DC. The annual gala hosted by the White House Correspondents Association was re-scheduled to tonight after the original event in April was cut short when an armed man, later identified as Cole Tomas Allen, attempted to get past a Secret Service checkpoint.

    L-R: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, President Donald Trump and Weijia Jiang

    Eric Lee/Getty Images

    There was pressure on the WHCA to directly confront Trump for his attacks on the press. Jiang talked about the purpose of the First Amendment and the intent of the founders, while commenting more generally on the state of the situation rather than call out specific episodes. She said, “Criticism of the media can be unfair. It can also be legitimate. We get a lot right, but sometimes we get things wrong. We mistake proximity to power for understanding it, and at times we get trapped in our own bubbles. There is a difference, though, an existential difference, between criticizing the press and trying to undermine it.”

    When it came to the defense of the press at a difficult moment, the approach of the WHCA appeared to be that of what is taught in J-school: Show, don’t tell. A video segment featured an AI-generated James Madison explaining the importance of the First Amendment, with clips of Trump’s predecessors, including Ronald Reagan to Barack Obama, acknowledging the essential role of the press corps. Comments from Dan Rather and Sam Donaldson reinforced how the adversarial nature of the relationship is nothing new.

    The most direct face-to-face with Trump’s press attacks came when Wolf Blitzer presented an award to Wall Street Journal for its reporting on an alleged bawdy letter that Trump wrote to Jeffrey Epstein. As Blitzer noted that Trump sued the Journal for $20 billion, the president gave a smirk, to some laughter, then he shook hands with the reporters who received the prize. After it was over, he threw his hands up in the air, as if to say, whatever.

    Toward the end of his winding remarks, Trump did say that he respected those in the room, but also that he planned to be back at the event next year.

    What seemed to really wow the room came at the end, when mentalist Oz Pearlman performed a series of feats, made all the more notable when they involved UN Ambassador Mike Waltz and Blanche. The latter figure, awaiting Senate confirmation to take the DOJ post permanently, gamely played along as Pearlman asked him to lie about how much money he had in his wallet. Blanche said $130; Pearlman wrote down the correct figure, $85.

    Later, Pearlman had Blanche sign one of his $20 bills.

    “Hold it up and let everyone see the federal offense you have just committed,” Pearlman quipped. “He just clearly lost the Senate confirmation hearings on camera.” The interplay made sense a little later when Pearlman performed another feat, writing a figure on a whiteboard that matched the serial number to Blanche’s bill.

    The moment was a bit incongruous to what is going on in D.C. and with Blanche himself, what with the DOJ recently issuing subpoenas to reporters from The New York Times, and then withdrawing them in the face of a judge’s criticisms. But for the WHCA dinner, a tradition that has traditionally mixed the serious with showbiz, Pearlman’s routine at least proved to be a bit of sparkling entertainment.