Blog

  • ‘Porto Rico’: Everything we know about Residente’s epic film

    ‘Porto Rico’: Everything we know about Residente’s epic film

    René “Residente” Pérez Joglar is moving behind the camera for one of the most ambitious projects of his career. The Puerto Rican rapper, filmmaker and actor is making his feature directorial debut with Porto Rico, an epic Caribbean western and historical drama inspired by real events in Puerto Rico during the turbulent final years of the 19th century. Production is now underway in the Dominican Republic, with Bad Bunny taking his first leading role in a feature film. 

    And the cast has become considerably bigger since the movie was first announced. Alongside Benito “Bad Bunny” Martínez Ocasio, the current lineup includes Viggo Mortensen, Edward Norton, Richard Gadd, Rhenzy Feliz, Ismael Cruz Córdova, Daniel Brühl, Rubén Blades, Alberto Guerra, Marcel Ruiz, Arian Cartaya, Óscar Jaenada, Carmen Machi and Luis Tosar. 

    The gold braided tie, a growing signature detail during Roseberry's tenure at the French fashion house.© Getty Images
    Media Image© Europa Press via Getty Images
    Media Image© WireImage

    Javier Bardem was part of the original cast announcement in February 2026, but the latest production report says the film subsequently “lost” Bardem while adding its new Spanish cast members. 

    Here is everything currently known about Porto Rico.

    What Is Residente’s ‘Porto Rico’ About?

    Porto Rico has been described by its producers as an “epic Caribbean western and historical drama” inspired by true events. Residente co-wrote the screenplay with Alexander Dinelaris, the Oscar-winning co-writer of Birdman, as informed by Live Nation Newsroom.

     Rene Perez Joglar visits the IMDb Portrait Studio© Getty Images for IMDb
    Rene Perez Joglar visits the IMDb Portrait Studio

    The project has been developing for several years. When it was first reported in 2023, the story was described as being based on the life of Puerto Rican revolutionary José Maldonado Román, better known as Águila Blanca, or White Eagle, according to Dominican newspaper, Diario Libre.

    Set around the end of the 19th century, the story follows a period when Puerto Rico was undergoing a dramatic transformation from Spanish colonial rule to American control.

    Maldonado was involved in the 1897 Intentona de Yauco, an unsuccessful uprising against Spanish rule. Historical accounts describe him joining Fidel Vélez and other revolutionaries who gathered outside Yauco and marched toward the town. 

    Earlier descriptions of Residente’s screenplay said Maldonado would lead a group of 17 former convicts as part of a story examining Puerto Rico’s struggle over colonialism, resistance and national identity. 

    Residente’s Porto Rico stars Bad Bunny, Edward Norton and Viggo Mortensen in an epic Caribbean western exploring Puerto Rico’s colonial history.
© Getty Images
    Residente’s Porto Rico stars Bad Bunny, Edward Norton and Viggo Mortensen in an epic Caribbean western exploring Puerto Rico’s colonial history.

    Deadline says the film will also address the events surrounding the United States’ 1898 takeover of Puerto Rico from Spain. That history also explains the movie’s title.

    Why Is the Movie Called ‘Porto Rico’ Instead of ‘Puerto Rico’?

    The missing “u” is intentional. After Puerto Rico came under U.S. control following the Spanish-American War, “Porto Rico” became the spelling used by the U.S. government. Federal law did not officially restore “Puerto Rico” as the island’s name until May 17, 1932.

    Residente has connected that linguistic change directly to the themes of his film. Speaking about the project in September 2026, he described Porto Rico as Puerto Rico seen through the perspective of a new colonizing power and suggested that losing a letter from the island’s name symbolized losing power over how the country identified itself. “The loss of a single letter summarizes the loss of power over one’s own name: occupying a country can also mean deciding what it is called,” indicated Residente, as informed by EFE Noticias.

    That makes the title much more than a historical spelling choice. It points directly toward the movie’s exploration of identity, political power and colonial control.

    Bad Bunny Leads the ‘Porto Rico’ Cast

    The biggest casting development is Bad Bunny’s leading role. Benito Martínez Ocasio has appeared in films including Bullet Train and Caught Stealing, but Porto Rico marks his first lead role in a feature film. 

    Singer Bad Bunny will star in Porto Rico© GC Images
    Singer Bad Bunny will star in Porto Rico

    His exact character has not officially been disclosed, as character details for the newly announced actors are being kept under wraps. Edward Norton also has a major role behind the scenes as one of the film’s producers. 

    The Oscar-Winning Talent Behind the Camera

    The filmmaking team extends well beyond Residente.

    Academy Award-winning cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle, whose credits include Slumdog Millionaire, is serving as director of photography. David Crank is the production designer, while Anna Terrazas is handling costume design. 

    Residente and Erick Douât are producing through 1868 Studios. Edward Norton, Bill Migliore and Michael Bederman are producing through Class 5 Films. The film is backed by Live Nation Studios and Class 5 Films along with several strategic financing partners. 

    Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu received a Special Award Oscar at the November ceremony, a prize that is rarely given out. The Academy's committee decided to recognize Alejandro's newest venture CARNE Y ARENA (translation: Meat and Sand), which premiered at the 2017 Cannes festival. Aiming to throw © Getty Images
    Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu received a Special Award Oscar at the November ceremony, a prize that is rarely given out.

    Perhaps the most notable name among the executive producers is filmmaker Alejandro G. Iñárritu, the Oscar-winning director behind Birdman and The Revenant. Other executive producers currently listed include Michael Rapino, Ryan Kroft, Stella Bulochnikov, Scott Budnick, Kwanza Jones, José E. Feliciano, Mike and Sukey Novogratz, Noah Assad, Henry R. Muñoz III, Ric Elias, Sherrese Clarke, Niija Kuykendall, Regina Solórzano and Lakshmi Iyengar. 

    When Will ‘Porto Rico’ Be Released?

    There is currently no announced release date for Porto Rico. Cameras are officially rolling in the Dominican Republic as of September 2026. No studio or distributor has announced a theatrical release date, streaming date or festival premiere. A trailer has also not been released.

    ‘Porto Rico’ Could Be a Major Moment for Caribbean Cinema

    Porto Rico is notable not simply because Bad Bunny is starring in it or because Residente is directing. The production is positioning a Puerto Rican historical story as a large-scale Caribbean western with an international cast and an unusually decorated creative team. Rather than using the traditional American frontier as the setting for a western, the film applies elements of the genre to Puerto Rico’s own history of rebellion, colonial rule and political transition.

    Residente has also emphasized the significance of making the film in Spanish, recalling that he had previously encountered the argument that studios were not interested in Caribbean stories. 

  • Crypto market structure can’t wait for shot at post-election Clarity Act surge: White House

    Crypto market structure can’t wait for shot at post-election Clarity Act surge: White House

    The congressional elections will determine whether the Republican majorities change hands in the U.S. House of Representatives, Senate or both and “will motivate certain people or reduce motivation for others,” Witt noted — with many political observers assuming Democrats won’t want to make any Clarity Act deals if they surge to greater authority at the end of the year.

    “There’s no time to waste now,” said Witt, whose primary task to get the Clarity Act passed by this Congress was foiled by U.S. Senate politics. He pointed to a rush of crypto progress since last week at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. “There’s no holding them back in hopes of a lame duck passage of the bill.”

    Witt granted that the regulators’ rules and exemptions may run into “challenges, legally,” without the underpinning of the law the administration had hoped to see, but he said, “We’re going to do what we can with the authorities that we have, which are many.”

    The crypto adviser was still reeling from the legislative loss.

    “Did we really need to drag that out for a year only to get a purely political result like that?” Witt asked. “I know we’re close to an election, but still, I just think it was a major disappointment.”

  • Billy Bush Joins Fox News As A Contributor

    Billy Bush Joins Fox News As A Contributor

    Billy Bush has joined Fox News as a contributor, in whuch he will offer cultural analysis on the network’s shows.

    That will start on Tuesday evening with an appearance of Jesse Watters Primetime.

    Bush hosts the digital show Hot Mics with Billy Bush, and previously anchored the syndicated series Extra from 2019 to 2025. After a tenure on Access Hollywood, Bush became a co-host on the third hour of Today. But he was dropped from the show in 2016 after a tape surfaced of his conversation with Donald Trump, as The Apprentice host made lewd remarks about women.

    In a statement, Bush said that he would “share my perspective on the people, ideas and moments shaping today’s culture…. as well as the ones trying to undo it!” Variety first reported on Bush’s new role.

    Bush also hosted the talk and music radio show, The Billy Bush Show, and also covered the Olympics for NBC and major entertainment events.

  • Keep an Eye on Bitcoin and XRP: Analyst Shares New Bullish Targets

    Keep an Eye on Bitcoin and XRP: Analyst Shares New Bullish Targets

    Crypto analyst Ali Martinez shared some notable technical levels following the recent strong price increases in Bitcoin ($BTC) and $XRP. According to Martinez, a break above $1.60 in $XRP could open the door to a new upward movement, while for Bitcoin, $100,000 has once again become a significant target.

    $XRP gained 27.6% in value, rising from $1.25 to $1.58. Martinez noted that this move may have completed the right shoulder of a large-scale inverse head and shoulders pattern forming on the daily chart.

    According to the analyst, the most critical level for $XRP right now is $1.60. This area corresponds to the neckline of the formation. Martinez stated that if $XRP makes a decisive breakout above $1.60, the formation could be confirmed, and in such a scenario, a further increase of approximately 30% could bring the $2 level into play.

    In addition to the technical outlook for $XRP, the actions of large investors are also attracting attention. According to data shared by Martinez, whales have recently accumulated more than $2 billion worth of $XRP.

    According to Martinez, Bitcoin is Back on the Agenda at $100,000.

    Martinez also believes the bullish outlook continues for Bitcoin. Bitcoin has risen more than 50% since its low of $57,749 seen on July 1st.

    According to the analyst, one noteworthy point is that despite the sharp rise in prices, large investors are remaining active in the market instead of taking profits. In just the last day, the Bitcoin network recorded over 2,722 transactions worth more than $1 million.

    On the institutional side, demand for spot Bitcoin ETFs is also a key factor supporting the rise. According to data shared by Martinez, US-based spot Bitcoin ETFs have accumulated over $1.60 billion worth of $BTC in the last 72 hours.

    One of the key support areas for Bitcoin is at $84,569. This area, where approximately 600,000 $BTC have previously changed hands, is noted as a strong demand zone, while the second important support level is indicated at approximately $77,000.

    In upward movements, on-chain cost breakdown data indicates a significant resistance level around $104,765. It’s noted that approximately 283,000 $BTC have already changed hands at this level.

    MVRV price bands present a similar picture. According to Martinez, the average MVRV band, around $100,670, is one of the next major resistances for Bitcoin. On the downside, the MVRV band around $74,361 stands out as a strong support zone.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Cory Booker Slams Paramount-WBD Merger Settlement But Blames Company And DOJ, Not State AGs

    Cory Booker Slams Paramount-WBD Merger Settlement But Blames Company And DOJ, Not State AGs

    Sen. Cory Booker (D-CA) weighed in on the proposed settlement reached between Paramount–Warner Bros. Discovery and state attorneys general, criticizing the agreement, yet casting blame on the David Ellison-run company and the Justice Department.

    In a statement, Booker said, “This is what happens when federal enforcers abandon their posts. States are left to carry the fight alone, and even the strongest state enforcers cannot outlast a company willing to say anything and spend anything. That is not justice. That is a price tag.”

    Booker referred to Paramount’s threat to leave California if the state AG lawsuit blocked the deal, saying that such a vow “amounted to extortion.”

    Booker, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary antitrust subcommittee, held a “spotlight” hearing on the merger on Capitol Hill in April, with merger opponent Mark Ruffalo among the speakers. Ellison was invited but declined the invitation. The event was not an official Senate hearing, with members of both parties attending, but are designed to focus attention on an issue.

    The settlement agreement does not force Paramount to shed assets unless it fails to honor a list of behavioral remedies, including commitments on film production and theatrical and cable negotiations.

    Booker said, “This merger is illegal. It shrinks two of Hollywood’s major studios from five to four and combines two of the largest basic cable owners—putting nearly a third of the theatrical film market and nearly a third of basic cable programming under one roof. Behavioral promises cannot fix a structural problem. Media merger after media merger has ended the same way, with fewer jobs, lower wages, fewer stories told, and higher prices for families. Writers, crews, artists, theater owners, and consumers will pay the price.”

    A Paramount spokesperson said of Booker’s statement, “We are proud of our deal – we are building a stronger Hollywood with more stories, more choice, and more competition. Nearly 70 jurisdictions reviewed it and unanimously agreed.”

    Booker also expressed doubts about another provision of the settlement: An editorial review board to oversee CNN and CBS News compliance with editorial standards. But the senator said that the merger “threatens the First Amendment.” “An ‘independent’ editorial board handpicked by David Ellison and reporting directly to him will not stop the sweeping changes at CNN that President Trump says the Ellisons promised him. We have already seen what this administration does to the press—the President just barred reporters from the White House,” Booker said.

    The Wall Street Journal reported that Larry Ellison, the CEO’s father and a major investor in the merger, told Trump that it could overhaul CNN. A Paramount spokesperson told the Journal that no commitments were made “to any government body, State AG or federal agency regarding the future of CNN or any other news property.”

    Booker also said that the merger was “the product of corruption in plain sight.”

    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth “stood in the Pentagon press room and said he couldn’t wait for the Ellisons to take over,” Booker said. “Paramount was a constant presence at the Justice Department once it needed the deal pushed through. But when Congress asked questions, the company ignored our inquiries and refused invitations to testify. On the night of the shareholder vote, Ellison hosted a dinner honoring President Trump. Then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, the official responsible for approving this deal, was in attendance.”

    Booker also said that he will examine “every merger this administration has approved,” a warning if Democrats win control of the Senate in the upcoming midterms.

  • Do images show statue of Jesus holding two Uzis?

    Do images show statue of Jesus holding two Uzis?

    Claim:

    Images authentically show a sculpture of Jesus Christ holding two Uzi submachine guns.

    Rating:

    True

    In September 2026, images circulated on social media purportedly showing a sculpture of Jesus Christ completely covered in red paint and holding an Uzi submachine gun in each hand.

    “BLASPHEMY: Statue of Christ crucified holding machine guns triggers uproar from Catholics,” one Facebook post (archived) read.

    (Facebook page LifeSite)

    Photographs of the sculpture spread across Facebook, TikTok and Reddit. Snopes readers also searched our website for information about the images.

    In short, the images were authentic. They showed a real sculpture by French artist James Colomina, who confirmed to us via email that he created and installed the artwork at L’Aérosol, a network of spaces devoted to hip-hop and street art in Marseille, France, in September 2026.

    What we know about the sculpture

    Colomina posted photographs of the sculpture to Instagram on Sept. 10, describing the work as “Tu ne tueras point,” which is French for “Thou shalt not kill.” The post’s description read in full:

    Thou shalt not kill.
    L’Aérosol, Marseille, 2026.

    We invented religions, laws, and principles.
    Then we invented a thousand reasons to break them.

    In an email, Colomina confirmed that the photographs showed the actual physical sculpture, which he installed at L’Aérosol on Sept. 7. “The sculpture is made of resin and painted red,” he said, adding that it “measures approximately 2 meters (6.5 feet) from head to toe.” He also confirmed that the weapons depicted in Christ’s hands were intended to be Uzis.

    At the time, French-language coverage also documented the artwork. On Sept. 11, La Dépêche du Midi reported on the sculpture and published photographs credited to Colomina. Toulouse7 published similar details and also credited its images to the artist.

    Colomina told us he personally took all of the photographs of the installation that he posted online or shared with news organizations, including images showing the sculpture both outside and inside L’Aérosol.

    Why was the sculpture moved indoors?

    Some news articles suggested the sculpture was moved indoors in response to public outrage.

    Colomina told us he installed the sculpture outside L’Aérosol on the morning of Sept. 7, where it remained throughout the day. At approximately 11 p.m. that evening, organizers moved it indoors. According to Colomina, the decision was precautionary:

    As the day went on, concern grew among the staff and organizers. They were convinced that this image, visible from the public space, would provoke very strong reactions. They were concerned about the consequences for the venue, but also about the safety of the staff and the people working there. As a precaution, they ultimately decided to remove the work from the exterior and move it indoors.

    Colomina said that, to his knowledge, the decision wasn’t made in response to a specific threat. 

    “The decision was primarily driven by the concerns of the staff and organizers about the reactions they believed the image would provoke,” he said.

    Le Parisien later reported that there were concerns the sculpture could be damaged if it remained outside and that its display could offend the religious convictions of some local residents.

    Therefore, the artist’s account suggests that the sculpture was not moved because of a specific threat or protest, but because organizers were worried the outdoor display could cause a strong reaction.

    Meaning behind the sculpture

    Colomina told us the work was based on the contradiction between the biblical commandment “Thou shalt not kill” and acts of violence committed in the name of religion:

    “Thou shalt not kill” begins with a contradiction that fascinates me. The biblical commandment is clear: “Thou shalt not kill.” And yet, throughout history and still today, people have killed and continue to kill in the name of their God, regardless of the religion they claim to follow.

    He said depicting Christ holding two Uzis was intended to force viewers to confront that contradiction. “Christ is a symbol here, but the work is not aimed at Christianity or at any particular religion,” Colomina said. Rather, the artwork addressed a broader discrepancy between the principles societies establish and their behavior:

    Through the religions, laws and principles that structure our societies, the work confronts us with our contradictions. We establish rules, values and prohibitions, and then find a thousand reasons to break them.

    All in all, the photographs circulating on social media were authentic. They showed Colomina’s physical sculpture, which he installed at L’Aérosol in Marseille in September 2026. The artist also confirmed that he took the photographs himself and that the sculpture depicts Christ holding two Uzis.

  • Trump: ‘My honour to settle eight wars’ including ‘war in Gaza’

    Trump: ‘My honour to settle eight wars’ including ‘war in Gaza’

    Speaking at the UN General Assembly, US President Donald Trump claimed he helped end the war in Gaza, bring home all remaining hostages, and settle eight wars since taking office. He said trade, tariffs and his relationships with world leaders were key to securing the settlements.

  • Kara Swisher Says She’s Leaving CNN Now That Settlement Clears Way For Paramount-WBD Merger

    Kara Swisher Says She’s Leaving CNN Now That Settlement Clears Way For Paramount-WBD Merger

    Kara Swisher said that she will depart CNN now that a legal settlement has cleared the way for Paramount to acquire the network’s parent, Warner Bros. Discovery.

    On her Pivot podcast with Scott Galloway, posted on Tuesday, Swisher said that she has “asked my agent to get me out of my contract. It ends December 31, so it’s only a few months, right? I just can’t. … I was trying to figure out ways I could work with them in some like licensing way, but then I thought, ‘F— these guys! I don’t want to work for them. I just don’t.”

    On Monday, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a settlement of a state AG lawsuit to block the merger, which includes the creation of an independent editorial board to oversee journalistic standards. But Swisher called such a board “dingbat nonsense,” citing the toothless nature of a board set up to oversee The Wall Street Journal when it was purchased by Rupert Murdoch in 2007.

    Swisher has been a contributor to the network since 2023 and headlined an original series, Kara Swisher Wants to Live Forever, earlier this year. She said that the network had been trying to keep her.

    “I have a lot of regard for the executives there now,” Swisher said. “I have other things that make more money, that matter more and have a bigger audience … I just don’t want to work” at the network with the David Ellison-led takeover.

    Swisher has been a critic of David Ellison and his father, Larry Ellison, and their purchase of WBD.

    She added, “I think they are terrible media owners. I would rather work for Rupert Murdoch.”

    She said, “I can’t leave yet, but I will leave as soon as I can.”

    A CNN spokesperson declined to comment.

    At CNN, the pending merger has generated plenty of anxiety as to the pending changes under the new owners. At a Politico summit last month, Paramount’s Chief Legal Officer Makan Delrahim talked about plans for CNN and said that Ellison “wants to bring it back to news,” a remark that suggested that the network wasn’t doing so now and was in for a major shift in the way it covers stories.

  • Did France, Ukraine feed Trump false intelligence to see if it would leak to Putin?

    Did France, Ukraine feed Trump false intelligence to see if it would leak to Putin?

    • After French President Emmanuel Macron said France was providing two-thirds of all intelligence to Ukraine on Jan. 15, 2026, a rumor gained traction that this was because Ukraine had given false intelligence to the U.S., which the United States then leaked to Russia, revealing the U.S. as an unreliable intelligence partner for Ukraine. The rumor continued to circulate in September 2026.
    • Snopes could find no evidence confirming the rumor Ukraine had shared false information with the U.S. Instead, this part of the claim came from an apparent misunderstanding of a Jan. 16, 2026, interview on a French news television channel. 
    • In that interview, Vincent Crouzet — a former intelligence officer at the Directorate General for External Security (DGSE), France’s foreign intelligence agency — said, without citing any sources, that Ukrainian intelligence officials suspected the U.S. had leaked information to Russia, causing Ukraine to stop sharing intelligence with the United States. In an X post two days later, Crouzet appeared to deny the claim that those leaks involved intentionally false information.
    • Snopes first contacted Crouzet in January 2026 and reached out to him again in late September to ask about his evidence for these alleged leaks and whether there was any indication they involved Ukraine intentionally feeding the U.S. false information. We had not received a reply before publication but will update this story if we learn more.

    In September 2026, a claim recirculated online that Ukraine had allegedly given the U.S. false intelligence that the United States then leaked to Russia, which revealed the U.S. as an unreliable intelligence partner.

    Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, starting a war that is ongoing as of this writing.

    For example, one X user, whose post had been viewed more than 8 million times at the time of publication, wrote (archived), “France and Ukraine fed Trump false intelligence to test whether he would leak it to Putin—and he did.”

    An Instagram user then posted a screenshot of that X post (archived). The caption said the claim fueled “speculation that Trump or people around his administration were leaking intelligence to Moscow,” but added that it “has not been proven.”

    (X)

    The rumor first spread at the start of 2026, shortly after French President Emmanuel Macron said France was providing two-thirds of Ukraine’s intelligence on Jan. 15. Social media users then suggested the reasoning behind the French-Ukrainian intelligence partnership was the alleged leak of false Ukrainian intelligence from the U.S. to Russia. Posts making the claim featured on X, Substack, Medium, Bluesky and Reddit.

    Several posts, including one on Facebook (archived), featured a screenshot of a since-deleted X post by user Luc Rombout, which read:

    Interesting message on French newschannel LCI:

    “Ukrainian intell services sent false strategic info to US intell services… and observed that the information had been relayed to RUS and was used by RUS forces.”

    => total replacement of US as Intell partner with FRA, GBR, DEU [France, the U.K., Germany]

    “Trump is leaking intelligence about our allies to Russia,” the Facebook post’s caption read.

    Snopes could find no evidence confirming the rumor Ukraine had shared false information with the U.S. Instead, this claim appeared to stem from a misunderstanding of an interview that aired on Jan. 16, 2026, on the French news television channel LCI. 

    The interview subject was Vincent Crouzet, who formerly worked at the Directorate General for External Security (DGSE), France’s foreign intelligence agency. He said in the interview, without citing his sources, that Ukrainian intelligence officials suspected the U.S. had leaked information to Russia, causing Ukraine to stop sharing intelligence with the United States.

    Asked to clarify his assertion that the U.S. had leaked Ukrainian intelligence to Russia, Crouzet said in a Jan. 18, 2026, X post (archived), which in English reads, “No, I did not say that: I said Ukrainians suspected risks of information leaks from the U.S. to the Russians.”

    Snopes first contacted Crouzet in January 2026 and then reached out to him again in September to ask him what evidence he could provide that Ukrainians suspected intelligence leaks from the U.S. to Russia and whether there was any reason to believe Ukraine had fed the U.S. false information. We also contacted the White House for a comment on the rumor. We will update this report if we receive any responses. 

    Due to the fact that we could not verify or disprove these details independently, we did not give this report a rating.

    The interview that sparked the rumor

    The rumor spread, in part, via the screenshot of the X post by Rombout, who identified himself on his LinkedIn page as the head of a crisis management center in Belgium. 

    Rombout’s post appeared to reshare a video clip posted on the 24H Pujadas account. 24H Pujadas is a program on LCI, considered reputable in France. 

    The clip itself was genuine and not created or altered using an artificial intelligence tool. Snopes identified an X post by the TV program 24H Pujadas with the video clip (archived) and a full video of the segment on the day it aired, Jan. 16, 2026. The presenter on that day was French journalist Yves Calvi.

    Rombout seemingly deleted his original X post that made the claim. In a later post, he said in French that he was quoting the discussion in the French news program, implying that the claim did not originate with him.

    A review of the televised interview showed Crouzet saying, in the context of discussing Macron’s speech announcing France was now providing two-thirds of Ukraine’s intelligence, that two Ukrainian intelligence officials had decided to stop sharing intelligence with the U.S. due to a lack of trust (emphasis ours):

    So this announcement went a bit under the radar, yet it is essential. It is essential in two ways. First because it marks the divorce between Ukrainian intelligence and U.S. intelligence, because if we [France] supply two-thirds of Ukraine’s intelligence, I can well imagine that the last third is supplies by other European partners — in this case, Germany and the U.K.

    When did this divorce happen? It happened on Feb. 28, 2025, during the famous session in the Oval Office, which created a break in the trust between Ukrainian intelligence and U.S. intelligence, to the point where the two leaders of Ukrainian intelligence — so, Vasyl Malyuk for the SBU [Security Service of Ukraine] and Kyrylo Budanov … you can see them on the screen … for the GUR [Main Directorate of Intelligence, military intelligence] — decided to no longer share effective intelligence they had with their U.S. partner due to U.S. leaks to Moscow.

    Rombout’s X post seemingly misinterpreted some details. At no point did Crouzet say Ukraine had fed the U.S. false information and then tracked that information to Russia. We first reached out to Rombout in January and then contacted him again in September for his response to our findings about the possible translation error. We will update this report if we receive a response.

    For further reading, Snopes examined a rumor spread by Russian hackers that 1.7 million Ukrainians died or went missing during the war with Russia.