Blog

  • Canada to fast track oil pipeline meant to diversify economy away from US

    Canada to fast track oil pipeline meant to diversify economy away from US

    Carney declared the pipeline a project of national interest, smoothening its way to a single federal regulatory review process.

    Canada will fast track the approval process for a new proposed crude oil export pipeline to its west coast that could generate billions in revenue and boost economic growth, Prime Minister Mark Carney has said.

    Carney made the announcement on Thursday to fast-track the pipeline, which is a crucial part of his bid to diversify the economy away from the United States and help lessen the effect of US President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 4 itemsend of list

    Carney said Ottawa is officially listing the Pacific Link pipeline, which had been announced in July, as a project of national interest. That will ensure it proceeds through a single federal regulatory review process. He said Ottawa aimed to complete the process by September 1, 2027.

    “A pipeline to the west coast is part of our mission to transform our economy, to double our non-US exports over the next decade … [and] to unlock our full potential as a global energy superpower,” he told reporters in Fort McMurray, hub of Alberta’s tar sands industry.

    Ottawa says the 1 million barrel a day project would create 140,000 jobs and generate more than 20 billion Canadian dollars ($14bn) in gross domestic product (GDP) per year and 100 billion Canadian dollars ($70bn) in government revenue by 2060.

    Canada currently has just one east-west oil export pipeline in Canada, the 890,000-barrel-per-day Trans Mountain pipeline. An expansion of that pipeline was completed in 2024, but it is already running at capacity.

    For years, Canada has sent more than 90 percent of its crude oil exports to the US via pipeline. A new oil export pipeline could make Canada a major global energy supplier, as Asia’s top importers seek oil from outside the Middle East in the wake of the Iran conflict.

    Filling the pipeline, however, would require new tar sands expansions of the type no company has undertaken in more than a decade.

    The pipeline will be built by government-owned Trans Mountain Corp in coordination with Pembina Pipeline Corp. Alberta estimates it could cost between 35.2 billion Canadian dollars and 43.7 billion Canadian dollars ($24.7bn – $30.7bn).

    The majority owners will be the federal government and the government of Alberta. Indigenous communities will be offered a minimum of 10 percent ownership interest.

    Previous oil pipeline projects in Canada have faced strong opposition from environmentalists and Indigenous groups, resulting in the cancellation of some projects and leading to cost overruns and construction delays with others.

    Alberta separatism

    Carney made the announcement alongside Alberta Premier Danielle Smith in Fort McMurray in the heart of Canada’s tar sands, a move meant to mend relations with oil-rich Alberta as separatists push for a referendum on leaving Canada.

    Alberta is holding a public vote on October 19 on whether to hold a referendum on leaving Canada. Smith has long complained that Carney’s predecessor, Justin Trudeau, hindered Alberta’s energy industry and fuelled separatist sentiment.

    Smith said she would vote to keep Alberta in Canada and called the roughly 22 percent support for separation in a recent poll “still too high for my liking”.

    “I don’t like the fact that many of our fellow citizens have given up on Canada,” Smith said, adding that the pipeline was an example of how “cooperative federalism can work in action”.

    Asked what message Albertans considering separation should take from the announcement, Carney said it demonstrated that “Canada is working” and showed what the country could achieve by acting together.

  • Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Leading in polls in the Los Angeles mayor’s race, Nithya Raman went on a charm offensive Thursday with the film and TV industry, and Paramount‘s CEO David Ellison in particular.

    “To David Ellison, to his co-CEO, I don’t just want those dollars that you’ve committed to productions to be spent in America — I want them to be spent in Los Angeles,” the two-term councilmember said today at the Bloomberg Screentime conference, which is taking place in her Hollywood district. Raman said that though she was opposed to $111 billion merger of Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery, now that the deal has been approved she has no interest in “relitigating this into eternity.”

    As has been the case many times in the past, the home of Hollywood has some unlikely bedfellows when it comes to the bottom line. It is unknown whether Raman has directly reached out to Paramount brass since U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín signed off Tuesday on the antitrust settlement between the Ellison-run company and a dozen state attorneys general. Paramount reps did not respond to Deadline’s request for comment on any communication between the councilmember and the CEO.

    David Ellison

    Paramount CEO David Ellison

    Getty

    In full campaign mode, Raman emphasized during today’s panel interview that she will be a “relentless advocate” for uncapping the state’s current $750 million a year film and TV tax incentive program as a further move to get production back to California and L.A. With a room full of execs before her, the spouse of TV comedy scribe Vali Chandrasekaran also reiterated she would “ensure that we had a film office in the mayor’s office that was liaising with other jurisdictions, that was making it as simple to shoot here as possible, as low cost to shoot here as possible, and that work would be established almost immediately.”

    To that, with production significantly on the decline over the past six years and more than 50,000 jobs lost, Raman followed the headlines as Ellison and his newly minted co-CEO Ynon Kreiz prepare to meld the two iconic Hollywood companies.

    “If I get to be mayor, I want to work with you and ensure and fight as hard as I possibly can to make sure that every single one of those shoots are happening here in Los Angeles,” the candidate said, addressing Ellison and Kreiz directly in absentia. “And I will do everything in my power to make sure that happens.”

    Although Raman leads incumbent Mayor Karen Bass by double digits in many polls, the fact is one-third of voters in the City of Angels remain undecided just more than a month before the election. To that, the candidate has to win over a portion of those who voted for ex-The Hills regular Spencer Pratt in the three-way primary earlier this year — and she had a pitch.

    “To every voter who voted for Spencer Pratt in the primary who is disappointed that he’s not in this general election, I want to speak directly to you,” Raman said of the Donald Trump ally. “I want to speak directly to them, and to say that I share your frustration with City Hall, and I will work with every molecule of my being to ensure that this city is working for you.”

    Among his various post-primary endeavors, former Palisades resident Pratt has been instrumental, by all bipartisan accounts, in the crafting of federal film and TV tax incentive legislation — a bill Raman has said she also supports.

    Leaning into her own outsider status, even with years on the L.A. City Council, Raman added, again addressing Pratt voters: “The frustrations that Angelinos have with the direction of our city is warranted. We have, under this mayor’s leadership, we have moved in the wrong direction and and away from actually delivering the kinds of services that we were able to deliver just a few years ago because of fiscal mismanagement under her leadership.”

    “So, to those Pratt voters, I just want to say to you, I will do better for you,” she said.

  • ‘The Celebrity Traitors’ Scores Record-Breaking Season 2 Premiere With Nearly 9 Million Viewers

    ‘The Celebrity Traitors’ Scores Record-Breaking Season 2 Premiere With Nearly 9 Million Viewers

    The second season of the U.K.’s “Celebrity Traitors” is off to a record-breaking start.

    More than 8.8 million viewers watched Thursday night’s premiere of the BBC‘s devious reality show, according to overnight numbers, with viewership peaking at 9 million. In addition, over 50% of people watching TV were tuning into “The Celebrity Traitors,” making it the top program of the evening.

    This marks a new premiere record for “The Traitors” series in the U.K., drawing in around 3 million more viewers than past launches for both the inaugural season of its celebrity version last year and the most recent civilian season. The number will only get bigger as those who missed the first episode catch up in the coming days.

    And what a premiere it was. This season of “The Celebrity Traitors” stars an impressive list of names joining host Claudia Winkleman, including Richard E. Grant, Bella Ramsey, Myha’la, Maya Jama, James Acaster, Jerry Hall, James Blunt, Michael Sheen and more. Grant has already proven himself to be a standout with his sheer enthusiasm for the game, immediately causing chaos in the castle. The show is set to air on BBC One and iPlayer every Thursday and Friday at 8 p.m. BST for the next month, with its second episode coming out tonight.

    Season 5 of the U.K.’s civilian “Traitors” is set to premiere early next year. The franchise has also become hugely successful in the U.S., with Alan Cumming hosting a celebrity version on Peacock, as well as a civilian spinoff called “New Blood” which launched in September.

  • Cboe wants to turn VIX into a never-ending trade

    Cboe wants to turn VIX into a never-ending trade

    In contrast, perpetual swaps never expire. Instead, they use a funding rate mechanism to anchor the contract price to the spot index, theoretically offering investors the closest possible proxy to trading the actual VIX spot price.

    “Traders don’t have to worry about expiries and decay and just focus on the direction of where they think the underlying is heading. The VIX is one of many more indexes, assets and metrics that will be perpified. We expect to see a strong wave of perp-ification to occur in the coming months,” Martin Lee, market insights lead at DWF Labs, told CoinDesk.

    Some crypto exchanges like Gate already offer VIX/USDT perps, but the market is highly illiquid with little noticeable volume. Recently Hyperliquid listed futures tied to bitcoin’s VIX – Volmex’s bitcoin implied volatility index.

    A potential launch of VIX futures could bring more traders to volatility markets. More buyers and sellers and more hedging by market makers across VIX futures and other S&P 500 derivatives could pull the various VIX products into closer agreement.

    However, costs still exist in the form of funding payments. Also the index is really just mathematical calculation and doesn’t exist like bitcoin, which creates a channelge for market makers, who cannot easily buy and sell the “spot” to hedge their risks, just as $BTC market makers do.

    “For us, the interesting question is how funding would anchor an index that cannot be bought as a cash asset. Removing expiry does not remove hedge costs or basis risk. Until contract terms exist, this is a potential new volatility market, not a cheaper substitute for options convexity,” analysts at Marex Solutions said in an email.

    For now, Cboe’s plan shows just how fast traditional and crypto market structures are converging to support advanced volatility products. Stay alert!

    Read more: For analysis of today’s activity in altcoins and derivatives, see Crypto Markets Today . For a comprehensive list of events this week, see CoinDesk’s Crypto Week Ahead.

  • John Wayne: 8 claims we’ve fact-checked

    John Wayne: 8 claims we’ve fact-checked

    Did John Wayne write inspiring letter to Montana school?

    Read More

  • Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Nithya Raman Reaches Out To David Ellison To Make Sure L.A Production & Jobs Return Now That ParaBros Deal Is Done

    Leading in polls in the Los Angeles mayor’s race, Nithya Raman went on a charm offensive Thursday with the film and TV industry, and Paramount‘s CEO David Ellison in particular.

    “To David Ellison, to his co-CEO, I don’t just want those dollars that you’ve committed to productions to be spent in America — I want them to be spent in Los Angeles,” the two-term councilmember said today at the Bloomberg Screentime conference, which is taking place in her Hollywood district. Raman said that though she was opposed to $111 billion merger of Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery, now that the deal has been approved she has no interest in “relitigating this into eternity.”

    As has been the case many times in the past, the home of Hollywood has some unlikely bedfellows when it comes to the bottom line. It is unknown whether Raman has directly reached out to Paramount brass since U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín signed off Tuesday on the antitrust settlement between the Ellison-run company and a dozen state attorneys general. Paramount reps did not respond to Deadline’s request for comment on any communication between the councilmember and the CEO.

    David Ellison

    Paramount CEO David Ellison

    Getty

    In full campaign mode, Raman emphasized during today’s panel interview that she will be a “relentless advocate” for uncapping the state’s current $750 million a year film and TV tax incentive program as a further move to get production back to California and L.A. With a room full of execs before her, the spouse of TV comedy scribe Vali Chandrasekaran also reiterated she would “ensure that we had a film office in the mayor’s office that was liaising with other jurisdictions, that was making it as simple to shoot here as possible, as low cost to shoot here as possible, and that work would be established almost immediately.”

    To that, with production significantly on the decline over the past six years and more than 50,000 jobs lost, Raman followed the headlines as Ellison and his newly minted co-CEO Ynon Kreiz prepare to meld the two iconic Hollywood companies.

    “If I get to be mayor, I want to work with you and ensure and fight as hard as I possibly can to make sure that every single one of those shoots are happening here in Los Angeles,” the candidate said, addressing Ellison and Kreiz directly in absentia. “And I will do everything in my power to make sure that happens.”

    Although Raman leads incumbent Mayor Karen Bass by double digits in many polls, the fact is one-third of voters in the City of Angels remain undecided just more than a month before the election. To that, the candidate has to win over a portion of those who voted for ex-The Hills regular Spencer Pratt in the three-way primary earlier this year — and she had a pitch.

    “To every voter who voted for Spencer Pratt in the primary who is disappointed that he’s not in this general election, I want to speak directly to you,” Raman said of the Donald Trump ally. “I want to speak directly to them, and to say that I share your frustration with City Hall, and I will work with every molecule of my being to ensure that this city is working for you.”

    Among his various post-primary endeavors, former Palisades resident Pratt has been instrumental, by all bipartisan accounts, in the crafting of federal film and TV tax incentive legislation — a bill Raman has said she also supports.

    Leaning into her own outsider status, even with years on the L.A. City Council, Raman added, again addressing Pratt voters: “The frustrations that Angelinos have with the direction of our city is warranted. We have, under this mayor’s leadership, we have moved in the wrong direction and and away from actually delivering the kinds of services that we were able to deliver just a few years ago because of fiscal mismanagement under her leadership.”

    “So, to those Pratt voters, I just want to say to you, I will do better for you,” she said.

  • Charlie Cox to Lead ‘The King’s Ransom’ Play in London

    Charlie Cox to Lead ‘The King’s Ransom’ Play in London

    “Daredevil” star Charlie Cox is returning to the London stage this winter to lead “The King’s Ransom,” a new play by Stuart Slade.

    World premiering at the Donmar Warehouse, “The King’s Ransom” is set in 1977 Memphis and stars Cox as Vince Black, a small-time crook who is offered the opportunity of a lifetime. “The plan is simple: Kidnap Elvis Presley’s corpse. Stash him in a chest freezer. Collect the million-dollar ransom,” the play’s synopsis says. “Vince assembles a crack team of misfits and dropouts to attempt the heist of the century.”

    The ensemble includes “The Inbetweeners” star Blake Harrison as Rusty, Tom Fletcher as Charlie, Matthew Flynn as Mr. Bluefield, Leo Patrick as Jessie Lee, Jenny Rainsford as Rhonda/ Jenny, Christopher Short as Elvis, Cherrelle Skeete as Mike and Ronnie Yorke as Red, with the role of Martha played by Ruby Barker, Eira Kay and Trixie Willis.

    Matthew Dunster (“2:22: A Ghost Story,” “The Hunger Games on Stage”) directs. “The King’s Ransom” will open on Dec. 16, with previews starting Dec. 5, and runs through Feb. 6, 2027.

    Cox previously starred in the 2010 production of “The Prince of Homburg” at the Donmar Warehouse. His other theater credits include the West End revival of Harold Pinter’s “Betrayal” in 2019, which he transferred with to Broadway.

    “The King’s Ransom” creative team includes set designer Anna Fleischle, costume designer Jean Chan, lighting designer Sally Ferguson, sound designer Holly Khan, illusion designer Chris Cox, fight and intimacy directors Ruth Cooper-Brown and Rachel Bown-Williams of Rc-Annie, and casting director Lotte Hines CDG.

  • ‘A Talent for Murder’ Director Anton Corbijn Praises Helen Mirren’s Performance as Controversial Author Patricia Highsmith: ‘She’s a Great Jerk!’

    ‘A Talent for Murder’ Director Anton Corbijn Praises Helen Mirren’s Performance as Controversial Author Patricia Highsmith: ‘She’s a Great Jerk!’

    In “A Talent for Murder,” director Anton Corbijn takes a closer look at writer Patricia Highsmith.

    Known for creating everyone’s favorite psychopath Tom Ripley, Highsmith – played by Helen Mirren – became a controversial figure because of her antisemitic and misanthropic statements.

    “By all accounts, she was much worse than what we show in the film. You don’t want her to be completely unlikable. It’s difficult when you don’t actually know the person and base everything on hearsay, but she was a very difficult woman. Also to herself,” he tells Variety.

    He enjoyed seeing Mirren, now in her 80s, fully embrace the role of someone who can be, well, a jerk.

    “She’s a great jerk! I think it’s healthy. It’s never too late to be a bitch. I’m referring to our Highsmith, of course. Luckily, she only killed fictional characters.”

    In the film, previously known as “Switzerland” after Joanna Murray-Smith’s play it’s based on – “I thought it would conjure too many images of cows and mountains,” Corbijn says – Highsmith is joined in her Swiss refuge by a young man, Edward (Alden Ehrenreich), who tries to persuade her to write another novel about Ripley.

    They don’t exactly bring out the best in each other. Quite the opposite.

    “They’re testing how bad people can be and how far they can go. Unfortunately, it’s always further than you’d like to think. Sometimes it has to do with generational trauma that manifests itself, or with human curiosity that leads to certain behaviors. I think it happens quite often: People get curious, and they go too far. That might be the case with Ripley, too.”

    Ripley is evil, but he doesn’t look it. In “The American Friend,” “The Talented Mr. Ripley” or Netflix’s show “Ripley,” he knows how to charm his victims. That’s his superpower.

    “When evil is obvious, it’s not interesting because you know it’s coming. That’s his strength, and I think that’s the strength of the film. You don’t know if you should like them or not,” notes Corbijn.

    “I love how Alden can change in very minimal ways. He can be this nerdy guy, and then he can be a mean killer with cold eyes. We got really lucky with this cast.”

    While the film emphasizes that the portrayal of Highsmith is “entirely fictional,” this is not the first time that Corbijn has taken on a real-life protagonist. “Control,” about Joy Division’s singer Ian Curtis, was his directorial breakthrough.

    “I knew the guy, so I think it’s a very truthful film. With ‘Life,’ I didn’t know James Dean. He died the same year when I was born, so we never got to meet,” he laughs.

    “You just fill in the gaps. But even Helen said that there’s something more mysterious about playing real-life characters than the ones you make up. It’s more complex and more interesting.”

    Mirren famously portrayed Elizabeth II in “The Queen” and former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir in “Golda.”

    “It can be so powerful, too. Now, when I think of Ian, I think of Sam Riley in the film. I’m so much more familiar with him than with the real Ian Curtis!”

    Corbijn first gained prominence as a photographer and music video director, working with the likes of Depeche Mode and U2. However, looking at what’s happening in the music and film industry, he can’t help but worry.

    “I get very depressed thinking about A.I. replacing so much in cinema, but it’s the same with music. Take ABBA concerts with their ‘avatars’. Is everything really replaceable? It’s dangerous because we all prefer comfort over substance, and that will be our downfall. Needless to say, there’s no A.I. in my film.”

    He adds: “I’m really worried about the immediate future because things are changing way too fast. I think we will respond badly to it. And too late.”

    He says he feels “quite pessimistic about the world.” He’s not the only one, which might explain why Ripley keeps on returning.

    “It’s as if he returns when the world aligns with his thinking, which is terrible. Maybe people are more accepting of murder today?”