Category: News

  • FCC Chairman Says Agency May Put Out Guidance On Fake Polls After Trump Calls For Action; Democrat Calls It An “Excuse For Censorship”

    FCC Chairman Says Agency May Put Out Guidance On Fake Polls After Trump Calls For Action; Democrat Calls It An “Excuse For Censorship”

    FCC Chairman Brendan Carr said that the agency may issue guidance on broadcasters’ reporting on political polls, after President Donald Trump called for action on data he has deemed as “fake.”

    In an interview on Fox News’ Sunday Briefing, Carr said that “there’s a lot of interest right now in big polls that are out there, and so the FCC may put guidance out soon to remind broadcasters about their obligations with respect to not airing fake polls, particularly if they’re done to suppress people heading into the fall.”

    Last month, Trump lashed out on coverage of poll results, which have been sagging in the 30s as Republicans seek to retain control of Congress.

    On Aug. 30, Trump posted on Truth Social, “THE FAKE POLLS USED BY OUR CROOKED MEDIA ARE OUT OF CONTROL, AND SOMETHING MUST BE DONE ABOUT IT. FCC TO THE RESCUE! President DJT”

    With less than two months until the midterm elections, the airwaves likely will be filled with polling. There have been concerns raised about bogus polls, including the revelation that a recent poll of the Los Angeles mayoral race. Trump, though, has often dismissed the data as “fake” even from reputable pollsters, some of whom have been off at times, when the results are not favorable to him. He sued Ann Selzer and the Des Moines Register over a pre-election poll in 2024 that showed Kamala Harris with a lead in Iowa. As it turned out, Trump handily won the state.

    Also on Aug. 30, Trump went after Meet the Press moderator Kristen Welker, who in an appearance on WRC-TV in Washington said that the president has “had some mixed results” when it comes to his endorsement record. While Trump’s endorsements have helped figures like Darline Graham, who won the nomination to succeeded her brother Lindsey Graham in the U.S. Senate, some of the president’s other picks have lost. They include Mike Lindell, who lost the GOP primary for Minnesota governor to Lisa Demuth, and Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN), who lost in his reelection bid to primary challenger Charlie Hatcher.

    Even though what Welker said was accurate, Trump vowed to report Welker to the FCC “for rebuke or punishment.”

    In the Fox News Sunday Briefing interview, Carr did not directly address Welker, but didn’t dismiss the idea of the FCC trying to take action on her comments either.

    Carr said, “The one thing that President Trump gets fundamentally is that broadcast TV is completely different than other forms of distribution, including cable. And so many broadcasters right now, they want to break the deal that they cut with the American people. They get billions of dollars in taxpayer effectively subsidized distribution. And what they’re supposed to do in exchange is operate in the public interest, not some sort of narrow partisan interest. I think President Trump is over the target, and we’re looking at a lot of actions.”

    Carr has previously invoked the FCC’s broadcast distortion policy, which subjects broadcasters to enforcement “if it can be proven that they have deliberately distorted a factual news report.” The agency also advises on its website that it authority to take action “is narrow.” “The agency is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on First Amendment rights of the press.”

    Anna Gomez, the sole Democrat on the FCC, said in an X post on Tuesday, “News coverage of a poll that doesn’t favor a political party is not a license to meddle in an election through intimidation. Broadcasters should take note. Do not let a sad and desperate attempt to punish accurate reporting become an excuse for censorship.”

    She added, “Polls can be wrong. That’s no surprise to anyone who has followed politics over the last decade. The FCC faces a very high bar to prove news distortion, and it requires clear evidence of an intentional effort to mislead the public. Without it, this is all political theater.”

    This post was corrected to reflect that Brendan Carr’s comments were during an interview on Fox News Sunday Briefing, not Fox News Sunday.

  • Did Trump claim the moon as US territory?

    Did Trump claim the moon as US territory?

    Claim:

    U.S. President Donald Trump appeared to claim U.S. ownership of the moon in a Truth Social post.

    Rating:

    True

    Context

    Trump’s Truth Social post strongly implied the president considers the moon to be under U.S. ownership, but it’s unclear whether the post amounted to an official declaration. The U.S. previously ratified a United Nations treaty that says countries can’t “claim” celestial bodies like the moon. It’s unclear whether Trump’s post constitutes a breach of that treaty.

    In early September 2026, social media users shared (archived) an alleged Truth Social post by U.S. President Donald Trump that appeared to declare the moon a U.S. territory. 

    Did Trump say the moon is ours?

    (X user @WarFrontIntel)

    Some social media users who discussed Trump’s alleged post wondered whether the U.S. could actually own the moon. For example, on Sept. 7, one Facebook page wrote: 

    For a few hours, the internet has been asking the same strange question: can a country actually own the Moon?

    President Donald Trump posted an image on Truth Social on September 6 with the words “THE MOON IS OURS” beside an American flag. The post is real, but the claim that he has formally made the Moon U.S. territory goes further than what actually happened. There was no accompanying executive order or legal declaration transferring the Moon to the United States. 

    Similar posts about Trump’s purported declaration and its legal validity circulated on Instagram (archived), Threads (archived), X (archived) and Bluesky (archived).

    Trump did appear to claim U.S. ownership of the moon in a Truth Social post. On Sept. 6, the president posted (archived) an image of the moon on Truth Social featuring the text “The Moon is Ours” followed by a U.S. flag.

    It was unclear whether Trump’s post amounted to the United States officially claiming ownership of the moon and, if so, whether other nations would recognize it.  

    Snopes previously reported that according to the United Nations Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, no country, including the U.S., can own the moon.

    The treaty’s Article II said that celestial bodies, including the moon, are not subject to “national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.” This essentially means that nations signing the treaty agree not to claim celestial bodies as their own.

    The U.S. was a founding signatory of the treaty and ratified it, meaning it could face political or economic consequences such as sanctions or embargoes for breaking it. It was unclear whether Trump’s Truth Social post amounted to a breach of treaty.

    We contacted the White House Press Office to ask whether Trump would withdraw the U.S. from The Outer Space Treaty in order to move forward with laying formal claim to the moon. We also contacted the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs, which helps countries draft and revise international space laws, to ask whether it would treat Trump’s Truth Social post as a breach of that treaty. We await replies to our queries.

    It was unclear as of this writing what would come of Trump’s apparent declaration. Declarations that a nation owns a territory are contingent on other nations respecting such an announcement. Given the fact that China, Russia, India and Japan (the four other nations that have reached the moon aside from the U.S.) also signed The Outer Space Treaty that said the moon was not subject to “national appropriation,” it appeared unlikely that they would recognize a U.S. claim.

    Trump’s post suggesting he viewed the moon as a U.S. territory was consistent with his administration’s messaging about space. 

    The president has worked towards establishing a U.S. presence on the moon during his second administration. In a Jan. 25, 2025, executive order titled “Ensuring American Space Superiority,” Trump wrote that his administration aimed to establish “elements of a permanent lunar outpost by 2030.” The executive order also said the administration would work to deploy nuclear reactors “on the Moon and in orbit, including a lunar surface reactor” that would be ready for launch by 2030.

    During his first administration, Trump signed an executive order titled “Encouraging International Support for the Recovery and Use of Space Resources” that said the U.S. did not view space as a “global commons,” meaning areas that lie outside of national jurisdiction. Essentially, the order suggested Trump’s first administration thought that space could be governed by individual nations like the U.S.

    For further reading, Snopes has investigated a series of other rumors about the moon and space.

    Sources

    Cavendish, Richard. ‘The Soviet Union Is First to the Moon’. History Today, 12 Aug. 2009, https://www.historytoday.com/archive/soviet-union-first-moon.

    ‘Encouraging International Support for the Recovery and Use of Space Resources’. Federal Register, 10 Apr. 2020, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/04/10/2020-07800/encouraging-international-support-for-the-recovery-and-use-of-space-resources.

    Executive Orders. ‘ENSURING AMERICAN SPACE SUPERIORITY’. The White House, 18 Dec. 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/12/ensuring-american-space-superiority/.

    ‘Global Commons’. UNESCWA, https://www.unescwa.org/sd-glossary/global-commons.

    Kuthunur, Sharmila. ‘India’s Chandrayaan-3 Lunar Lander Barely Kicked up Any Moon Dust. Here’s Why That Matters’. Space, 18 Mar. 2024, https://www.space.com/india-chandrayaan-3-lunar-lander-moon-dust.

    Lee, Liz, et al. ‘China Lands on Moon’s Far Side in Historic Sample-Retrieval Mission’. Reuters, 2 June 2024, https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/china-lands-uncrewed-spacecraft-far-side-moon-2024-06-01/.

    Mehta, Jatan. ‘How Japan’s “Moon Sniper” Mission Hit Its Mark’. Scientific American, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-japans-moon-sniper-mission-hit-its-mark/. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.

    ‘Outer Space Treaty’. U.S. Department of State, //2009-2017.state.gov/t/isn/5181.htm. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.

    Roles Responsibilities. https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/aboutus/roles-responsibilities.html. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.

    United Nations Treaty Collection. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XXIV-2&chapter=24&clang=_en. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.
     

  • Maria Bartiromo’s Fox Exit “Self-Inflicted Wound”; Trump Praises “True Warrior” As Legal Threats & Accusations Of Host Sharing Insider Info Fly

    Maria Bartiromo’s Fox Exit “Self-Inflicted Wound”; Trump Praises “True Warrior” As Legal Threats & Accusations Of Host Sharing Insider Info Fly

    EXCLUSIVE: The coup de grâce that caused Fox to announce this week that Maria Bartiromo would “no longer be with” the conservative news outlet was a case of “very bad judgment” and a long time coming, sources say.

    The assertions come Friday despite Bartiromo’s Hollywood attorney Bryan Freedman insisting the veteran Wall Street anchor is still “an employee” of Fox and threatening legal action. Adding to the burgeoning media mess surrounding the so-called “Money Honey,” Donald Trump had thrown serious shade on Fox for taking good pal Bartiromo off the air.

    That shade could set the stage for yet another showdown between Trump and his once favorite media buddies at the Murdoch-ruled Fox.

    “I can’t believe Maria Bartiromo is no longer going to have her great show(s) on FoxNews/Business,” Trump, a frequent Bartiromo guest, posted Thursday night, about 12 hours after Fox announced “effective today” that the Mornings With Maria host was out. “Three different shows, always number one. Maria is a total professional, and a true warrior. Her fans, of which there are many, will not be happy. God bless you, Maria!”

    Bartiromo hadn’t been on the air for almost a month, with Deadline confirming that Fox brass had enough of the MAGA-friendly Bartiromo after they learned she passed corporate-guidance missives to the White House in recent months. However, carving her own way at Fox Business and Fox News for more than a decade, those communications were just the latest minefield that Fox execs feared could blow up in everyone’s faces.

    “Her indiscretion was just the latest in a series of self-inflicted wounds,” a cable news insider says of Bartiromo and her close ties with Trump. “This has been a concern for a while, Maria being too cozy with the White House. She crossed a line, and she’s suffered the consequences.”

    Weary of addressing allegations of similar conduct over the years by Sean Hannity and other Fox hosts, or Bartiromo’s contract specifics, the source added: “She’s no longer with Fox. Take that for what it is.”

    Deadline hears that while there may be “technical truth” to Freedman’s remarks today that Bartiromo still works at Fox because of contracts and other paperwork, she is not returning to her Fox Business or Fox News roles — full stop.

    Long a passionate defender of POTUS and offering him a platform over the years, Bartiromo’s apparent sharing of internal edicts with Trump administration officials, first reported by Status, made her pink-slipping inevitable.

    Digging a little deeper and a few years back, the seeds of Bartiromo’s downfall were evident if you connect the red string.

    In April 2023, Fox agreed to pay $787 million to settle a lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems, one of the technology firms singled out in Fox’s coverage of the 2020 election results. Citied in volumes of court filings and the high-stakes trial that had just begun when Fox settled, Bartiromo was one of the main hosts on Fox promoting the false claims of irregularities with the election Trump lost and Joe Biden won. At the time, the top-rated Tucker Carlson was pulled off the air at Fox in a move that resulted in a Freedman-handled legal dust-up between Carlson and the media company.

    No word from ex-Apprentice host Trump if Bartiromo is in the running to be the new White House Press Secretary, but sharp-elbowed lawyer Freedman says his client actually isn’t looking for a new job because she still has her old one.

    “For many years, Maria Bartiromo hosted three number one rated television shows on Fox channels,” Freedman said Friday, as my colleague Dade Hayes noted earlier. “She has been, without question, one of the hardest working journalists throughout her award winning career.”

    The lawyer for the likes of Carlson and Megyn Kelly, as well as Don Lemon, then unsheathed the knife that may lead to a bloody affair down the line.

    “The irresponsible reports that have been published stating that Maria Bartiromo was fired or is no longer an employee of Fox are absolutely and unequivocally false,” Freedman said. “Make no mistake, we have the receipts and witnesses and they will come out whether through the courthouse or otherwise. Those reporting her firing or the incredulous facts supporting that fiction have exhibited a complete and utter reckless disregard for the truth.”

    When Deadline asked Fox for a response to Freedman’s statement about his client’s employment situation, the company said: “the release speaks for itself.” The White House did not respond to Deadline’s request for comment.

  • US won’t join UK ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements

    US won’t join UK ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements

    US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says Washington will ‘obviously not’ follow the UK in sanctioning illegal Israeli settlements. France and Canada are also taking action, as the UK says Palestinians face ethnic cleansing by Israeli settlers in parts of the occupied West Bank.

  • ‘60 Minutes’ Gives A Peek At Story Lineup For Season Premiere Following Tumultuous Revamp

    ‘60 Minutes’ Gives A Peek At Story Lineup For Season Premiere Following Tumultuous Revamp

    The season premiere of 60 Minutes on Sunday will feature Norah O’Donnell’s interview with the weapon systems officer whose plane was struck down in Iran, leading to a successful rescue operation.

    The newsmagazine will be starting its 59th season with plenty of scrutiny: It’s the first original broadcast since a tumultuous revamp earlier this year. The network ousted executive producer Tanya Simon and brought in Nick Bilton to succeed her, while correspondents Sharyn Alfonsi and Cecilia Vega were dropped and, sharply criticizing the changes in an all-staff meeting with Bilton, Scott Pelley was fired. The three correspondents have all claimed political interference in their stories, something that the network has denied.

    Under CBS News editor in chief Bari Weiss, the show has brought in Ross Douthat, a former New York Times columnist, as a correspondent, and upped O’Donnell’s role on the broadcast. Those joining as contributors include Gianna Toboni, former senior correspondent at Vice News, who is also a CBS News national correspondent; Sebastian Junger; Ariel Levy, a staff writer at the New Yorker; Trevor Phillips, who is also senior global affairs correspondent for the network; and Matt Gutman, who is also chief correspondent for the news division.

    The network also unveiled a portrait of the team, taken by Mark Seliger at the Oyster Bar at Grand Central Terminal.

    O’Donnell’s segment will feature interviews with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth; Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and Admiral Brad Cooper, the operational commander of the war with Iran. In the interview, the officer is identified by the call sign Dude Four Four Bravo.

    Another segment, from correspondent Jon Wertheim, will be a look at the Los Angeles Rams. Wertheim, Lesley Stahl and Bill Whitaker chose to remain with the show.

    60 Minutes also leans more heavily in film-like narrative in a trailer for O’Donnell’s interview.

  • CNN To Host Debate Between California Gubernatorial Candidates Xavier Becerra And Steve Hilton

    CNN To Host Debate Between California Gubernatorial Candidates Xavier Becerra And Steve Hilton

    California gubernatorial candidates Xavier Becerra and Steve Hilton will meet for a debate later this month, a nationally televised event hosted by CNN.

    The event will take place at 9 p.m. ET/6 p.m. PT on Sept. 30 at the network’s studios in Burbank, with Jake Tapper and Dana Bash serving as moderators.

    Becerra and Hilton previously shared the stage in primary debates, including a CNN event last May that was moderated by Kaitlan Collins and Elex Michaelson. As of now, this will be their first one-on-one debate.

    Becerra, a Democrat, and Hilton, a Republican, were the top two finishers in the primary in June.

  • Is image of Pope Leo XIV wearing Nike sneakers real?

    Is image of Pope Leo XIV wearing Nike sneakers real?

    Claim:

    An image authentically shows Pope Leo XIV wearing Nike sneakers with his vestments.

    Rating:

    True

    Context

    The picture predates the papacy of Leo, whose real name is Robert Prevost.

    In 2026, people shared an image allegedly showing Pope Leo XIV wearing Nike sneakers with his vestments.

    For example, on May 9, an Instagram user shared (archived) the image with the caption, “Pope Leo XIV wearing Nikes with his vestments from ‘Leone a Roma’ Trailer by Vatican News (2026).”

    (@durangoism via Instagram)

    Other users shared the image on various social media platforms.

    In today’s age of evolving artificial intelligence, some people might question the authenticity of such an image showing the man now serving as pope, whose real name is Robert Prevost, donning such casual footwear.

    In short, the image is real and predates his time in the papacy. As some users’ posts said, the photo originated in “Leone a Roma,” a documentary released in 2026 that attempts to “retrace the years Robert Francis Prevost spent in the Eternal City” — a reference to Rome. Vogue identified the shoes as a pair of Nike Franchise Low Plus sneakers.

    Snopes emailed the Holy See press office to ask for further information, including to confirm exactly when the photo was taken.

    The picture appears at the 0:51 mark in the film’s trailer:

    The same photo also makes an appearance during a montage in the full documentary (28:28). That montage begins with the brief onscreen title “World Youth Day 2008,” as well as pictures of people wearing clothing referencing that day, indicating someone possibly took the photo either at that specific gathering or another past youth event.

    Leo also appeared on Vanity Fair’s 2026 “best dressed list,” with the publication referencing the photo with his “most memorable look,” reading, “Even prior to the papacy, Leo, FKA Father Bob, took his modest cream cassock to heavenly heights by pairing them with Nikes.” For his “fashion claim to fame,” the outlet wrote, “Leo has kept his sense of wry casualness, sometimes sporting baseball caps.”

    For further reading, we previously investigated the claim that Leo said no one can use God to justify war, as well as the claim he used AI to write his first encyclical.

  • 7 rumors about James Talarico we’ve fact-checked

    7 rumors about James Talarico we’ve fact-checked

    Balk, Tim. “Can Democrats Win Back the Senate? Why Their Chances Are Improving.” The New York Times, 24 Aug. 2026, https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/24/us/politics/democrats-republicans-midterms-senate-majority.html.

    Bobic, Igor. “Democrats Are Getting More Bullish About Taking the Senate.” NOTUS, 21 Aug. 2026, https://www.notus.org/2026-election/democrats-path-senate-majority-map.

    Esposito, Joey. “Did Trump Call James Talarico’s Support of Trans People an ‘Insult to Jesus’?” Snopes, 24 Mar. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/trump-talarico-insult-jesus/.

    ———. “‘God Is Nonbinary’: What James Talarico Said While Opposing Texas Anti-Trans Youth Sports Bill in 2021.” Snopes, 16 Mar. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/james-talarico-god-nonbinary/.

    ———. “Posts Sharing James Talarico Quote about Hating Christianity Omit Context.” Snopes, 26 June 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/talarico-hates-christianity-quote/.

    ———. “Talarico Voted against Bill Meant to Protect Texas Land from Chinese Interests. Here’s Why.” Snopes, 3 Sept. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/talarico-china-texas-land-bill/.

    Izzo, Jack. “Republicans Claim James Talarico, Texas Candidate for US Senate, Is Vegan. He’s Not.” Snopes, 29 May 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/james-talarico-isnt-vegan/.

    Lee, Jessica. “Did Texas Rep. Talarico Open Up About Having Diabetes and Announce Insulin Cap Bill?” Snopes, 8 Apr. 2021, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/james-talarico-diabetes/.

    M, et al. “As Competitive Senate Map Emerges, Both Democrats and Republicans See a Path to Win.” NPR, 17 July 2026. Politics. NPR, https://www.npr.org/2026/07/17/nx-s1-5875199/as-competitive-senate-map-emerges-both-democrats-and-republicans-see-a-path-to-win.

    Rascouët-Paz, Anna. “Hegseth’s Pastor Said He Wants Democratic Texas Rep. James Talarico ‘crucified.’ Here’s Context.” Snopes, 27 Mar. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/hegseth-pastor-talarico-crucified/.

  • Maria Bartiromo’s Fox Exit “Self-Inflicted Wound”; Trump Praises “True Warrior” As Legal Threats & Accusations Of Host Sharing Insider Info Fly

    Maria Bartiromo’s Fox Exit “Self-Inflicted Wound”; Trump Praises “True Warrior” As Legal Threats & Accusations Of Host Sharing Insider Info Fly

    EXCLUSIVE: The coup de grâce that caused Fox to announce this week that Maria Bartiromo would “no longer be with” the conservative news outlet was a case of “very bad judgment” and a long time coming, sources say.

    The assertions come Friday despite Bartiromo’s Hollywood attorney Bryan Freedman insisting the veteran Wall Street anchor is still “an employee” of Fox and threatening legal action. Adding to the burgeoning media mess surrounding the so-called “Money Honey,” Donald Trump had thrown serious shade on Fox for taking good pal Bartiromo off the air.

    That shade could set the stage for yet another showdown between Trump and his once favorite media buddies at the Murdoch-ruled Fox.

    “I can’t believe Maria Bartiromo is no longer going to have her great show(s) on FoxNews/Business,” Trump, a frequent Bartiromo guest, posted Thursday night, about 12 hours after Fox announced “effective today” that the Mornings With Maria host was out. “Three different shows, always number one. Maria is a total professional, and a true warrior. Her fans, of which there are many, will not be happy. God bless you, Maria!”

    Bartiromo hadn’t been on the air for almost a month, with Deadline confirming that Fox brass had enough of the MAGA-friendly Bartiromo after they learned she passed corporate-guidance missives to the White House in recent months. However, carving her own way at Fox Business and Fox News for more than a decade, those communications were just the latest minefield that Fox execs feared could blow up in everyone’s faces.

    “Her indiscretion was just the latest in a series of self-inflicted wounds,” a cable news insider says of Bartiromo and her close ties with Trump. “This has been a concern for a while, Maria being too cozy with the White House. She crossed a line, and she’s suffered the consequences.”

    Weary of addressing allegations of similar conduct over the years by Sean Hannity and other Fox hosts, or Bartiromo’s contract specifics, the source added: “She’s no longer with Fox. Take that for what it is.”

    Deadline hears that while there may be “technical truth” to Freedman’s remarks today that Bartiromo still works at Fox because of contracts and other paperwork, she is not returning to her Fox Business or Fox News roles — full stop.

    Long a passionate defender of POTUS and offering him a platform over the years, Bartiromo’s apparent sharing of internal edicts with Trump administration officials, first reported by Status, made her pink-slipping inevitable.

    Digging a little deeper and a few years back, the seeds of Bartiromo’s downfall were evident if you connect the red string.

    In April 2023, Fox agreed to pay $787 million to settle a lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems, one of the technology firms singled out in Fox’s coverage of the 2020 election results. Citied in volumes of court filings and the high-stakes trial that had just begun when Fox settled, Bartiromo was one of the main hosts on Fox promoting the false claims of irregularities with the election Trump lost and Joe Biden won. At the time, the top-rated Tucker Carlson was pulled off the air at Fox in a move that resulted in a Freedman-handled legal dust-up between Carlson and the media company.

    No word from ex-Apprentice host Trump if Bartiromo is in the running to be the new White House Press Secretary, but sharp-elbowed lawyer Freedman says his client actually isn’t looking for a new job because she still has her old one.

    “For many years, Maria Bartiromo hosted three number one rated television shows on Fox channels,” Freedman said Friday, as my colleague Dade Hayes noted earlier. “She has been, without question, one of the hardest working journalists throughout her award winning career.”

    The lawyer for the likes of Carlson and Megyn Kelly, as well as Don Lemon, then unsheathed the knife that may lead to a bloody affair down the line.

    “The irresponsible reports that have been published stating that Maria Bartiromo was fired or is no longer an employee of Fox are absolutely and unequivocally false,” Freedman said. “Make no mistake, we have the receipts and witnesses and they will come out whether through the courthouse or otherwise. Those reporting her firing or the incredulous facts supporting that fiction have exhibited a complete and utter reckless disregard for the truth.”

    When Deadline asked Fox for a response to Freedman’s statement about his client’s employment situation, the company said: “the release speaks for itself.” The White House did not respond to Deadline’s request for comment.

  • 20 claims about public figures defying Trump, debunked

    20 claims about public figures defying Trump, debunked

    Christensen, Laerke. “Did Adm. Alvin Holsey Call Trump ‘a Disgrace’ before Abrupt Resignation? Not so Fast.” Snopes, 10 Dec. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/trump-disgrace-holsey-resignation/.

    ———. “Did Pope Leo XIV Call Trump ‘Vicious, Old B******’? Don’t Be Fooled.” Snopes, 24 Mar. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/pope-leo-xiv-trump-quote/.

    ———. “Did US Figure Skater Ilia Malinin Receive Threatening Message from Trump?” Snopes, 6 Mar. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/ilia-malinin-message-trump/.

    ———. “Trump Didn’t Call Various Public Figures ‘offenders of Jesus,’ despite Claims.” Snopes, 6 May 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/trump-offenders-jesus/.

    Deng, Rae. “Don’t Believe Claim Pope Leo XIV Gave ‘fiery Sermon’ after Trump Called Him ‘Insult to Jesus.’” Snopes, 30 Mar. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/pope-leo-trump-insult-jesus/.

    Ibrahim, Nur. “Be Wary of Images Showing Jimmy Kimmel’s ‘final Monologue’ after Trump Criticism.” Snopes, 8 Dec. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/jimmy-kimmel-monologue-trump/.

    ———. “Did Pope Leo XIV Say Trump Is ‘destroying Democracy’ to Stay out of Prison?” Snopes, 28 July 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/pope-leo-xiv-trump-democracy/.

    Izzo, Jack. “Historian Heather Cox Richardson Didn’t Go Live at 3 a.m. after Receiving Threat. Here’s How We Know.” Snopes, 23 May 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/heather-cox-richardson-threat/.

    ———. “Snopestionary: AI Slop, Explained.” Snopes, 22 Aug. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//articles/470975/ai-slop-media-literacy/.

    ———. “Tune out Claim about Stephen Colbert’s Impromptu 3 a.m. Broadcast.” Snopes, 24 Feb. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/stephen-colbert-3-am-monologue/.

    ———. “Tune out Claim Pope Leo XIV Went Live at 3 a.m. to Share ‘Urgent Message.’” Snopes, 25 Mar. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/pope-leo-live-3-am-urgent-message/.

    ———. “Watch out for Alleged Video of US Women’s Hockey Captain Hilary Knight Declining White House Invite.” Snopes, 27 Feb. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/hilary-knight-white-house/.

    ———. “Watch out for Fake Video of Queen Camilla Calling Trump ‘Arrogant and Rude Clown.’” Snopes, 5 May 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/queen-camilla-trump-rude-clown/.

    Liles, Jordan. “Deepfake Videos of George Will on Trump, Supreme Court Spread Misinformation.” Snopes, 3 Jan. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/george-will-trump-deepfake-videos/.

    ———. “Did Bill Clinton Criticize Trump’s Comments about Pope Leo XIV? Watch out for Fake Audio.” Snopes, 16 Apr. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/bill-clinton-trump-pope-audio/.

    ———. “Did Josh Groban Confront Trump about Asking Band to Play Song ‘You Raise Me Up’?” Snopes, 4 Nov. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/trump-josh-groban/.

    ———. “Did Matthew McConaughey Host Livestream about Epstein Files, Bondi and Trump?” Snopes, 27 Mar. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/mcconaughey-livestream-epstein-files/.

    ———. “Kenny Loggins Filed $900M Lawsuit against Trump?” Snopes, 24 Oct. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/kenny-loggins-sues-trump/.

    ———. “Watch out for Videos Claiming Gen. Randy George Spoke out against Trump.” Snopes, 6 Oct. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/general-randy-george-trump-comments/.

    Nevins, Mark. “Why It’s Time To Stop Saying ‘Move Fast And Break Things.’” Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/hillennevins/2026/03/26/why-its-time-to-stop-saying-move-fast-and-break-things/. Accessed 1 Sept. 2026.

    Rascouët-Paz, Anna. “Posts Claim Eric Clapton Called Trump ‘disgrace to America’ and ‘Cancer on Society.’ Here’s the Truth.” Snopes, 29 Dec. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/eric-clapton-trump-disgrace-cancer/.

    Winter, Emery. “Did Caitlin Clark Respond to Trump’s ‘attack’ with Uplifting Message?” Snopes, 5 Aug. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/caitlin-clark-response-trump-attack/.

    ———. “Did David Muir ‘snap’ on Air, Warning of Martial Law and No Midterms?” Snopes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/david-muir-martial-law-warning/.

    ———. “Did Warren Buffett Warn of Trump Declaring Martial Law and ‘canceling’ Democracy? Here’s the Truth.” Snopes, 25 May 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/warren-buffett-trump-warning/.

    Wrona, Aleksandra. “Did Bill Clinton Give Speech Criticizing Trump’s Mount Rushmore Address?” Snopes, 23 July 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/clinton-trump-mount-rushmore-speech/.