Author: rb809rb

  • How ‘Michael’ Filmmakers Blended The King of Pop’s Singing Voice with Jaafar Jackson’s

    How ‘Michael’ Filmmakers Blended The King of Pop’s Singing Voice with Jaafar Jackson’s

    Jaafar Jackson’s portrayal of his uncle Michael Jackson in the eponymous Michael will assuredly be a talking point among the film’s viewers for months ahead, as the younger Jackson delivers an impressive, spot-on take on the King of Pop, from his look to his mannerisms, smile, dance moves — and yes — his voice.

    Regarding the speaking voices, that’s all Jaafar and Juliano Valdi, who portrayed a 10-year-old, Jackson 5-era Michael in an equally convincing performance. But getting Jackson’s iconic singing vocals requires savvy sound editing, with the team blending Jaafar and Valdi’s live vocals that they performed on set with Michael’s original recordings.

    The actors’ voices are heard in the singing performances when there isn’t a genuine Jackson recording, such as scenes where Jaafar scats in the studio while recording “Don’t Stop Til You Get Enough” or when Valdi does the initial takes of “I Want You Back.” Michael’s voice becomes more dominant when the pure recording is allowed to take over.

    “We had the discussion a lot, could we have Jaafar and Juliano go to a studio and record those songs, and the answer was yes,” says Michael music supervisor John Warhurst. “They were capable of delivering those vocals. But then it becomes more an overall philosophy of when people go see the movie, do they want real Michael to be a part of this movie, or do they want it to just be 100 percent Giuliano and Jaafar? Every movie is different, but here we think people want Michael to be a part of it.”

    Warhurst has worked on several of the most prominent music films of the past decade, including Bob Marley: One Love, Whitney Houston: I Wanna Dance With Somebody and Bohemian Rhapsody, the latter of which earned him an Oscar. Below, he breaks down the extensive process on how Michael handled the vocals.

    Let’s start from the top. How did you guys actually do it?

    I’ve worked on quite a few musical films over the years, there’s a few different ways you can approach the vocals. But the best way I’ve found is to approach it like a live musical. That entails the the actor going on set and performing the pieces themselves. Ignore how we’re going to put it together in post-production at this stage. When you use recordings, one of the first things you need is what I call the visual canvas. You can’t put an incredibly powerful voice on a face that doesn’t look like it’s projecting that kind of power. The actors need to learn the songs so that they can actually sing them with the same sort of energy and power as the original artist and then perform it.

    Often with these scenes, we’re pretending that we’re in a recording studio, and that means we can actually record. The actor’s wearing headphones. We have a huge microphone in front of them. We should be able to shoot it exactly as if we were recording it for an album. The next important ingredient is as many live takes as you can get without music on it.

    It’s more complicated when we do the stadium performances. It isn’t as much like a recording session. There’s more outside of the recording. You see Jaafar doing more of his own bits and pieces and ad libs. And when you’ve got a set that size, you need to really sort of vibe it up a lot. You want the ground to shake. You want everybody to feel it in the room, and it to be that sort of atmosphere.

    It sounds like you’re essentially getting stems of their vocals.

    Yeah, of their performance. Once we’ve got that right visual canvas and the recordings, when you get to post-production, we’ve got 15 to 20 takes of Jaafar or or Juliano and the one take of Michael with his recording. That’s where the blend comes into it. In that scene when Jaafar is performing as Michael recording “Don’t Stop ‘Til You Get Enough,” he does that scatting stuff. I call that “dialog.” We don’t have Michael doing that. That is Jaafar.

    Or that scene of Juliano doing the opening lines of “I Want You Back” where Berry Gordy has to stop Michael and tell him he’s moving too much. If we used Michael on the first take, when we use him again on the final, it’d feel like a carbon copy. So the first time is just Juliano, then the second time when it’s meant to be getting closer we add in some Michael.

    How long does the process take?

    The process starts as soon as someone gets cast. Especially when it comes to singing, the one thing my ear always picks up on straight away is the strength of voice, in the strength of the vocal, and that’s not something you’re going to do in two or three weeks. You need a lot of vocal coaching.

    And then there’s always back and forth in post production, it’s never version one of a movie. Everybody wants to try everything in every single different way possible. You’re constantly reworking. And then you get really happy with the vocal, and they say, “no, we’re going to re-edit this scene.”

    How similar a process was it with Bohemian Rhapsody? I know the vocalist Marc Martel was very involved there to get Freddie’s vocals.

    It was a very similar process [to get the visual canvas]. The difference with Freddie and Rami was that Freddie was a tenor, and Rami more of a baritone, he had a much deeper voice. That’s where Mark Martel came into it. We understood the differences, and he sounded like Freddie and we could get the vocal if we didn’t have an original recording that fit.

    With Jaafar and Juliano, we did not need that. They were both so close.  Jaafar is Michael’s nephew. Physically his voice is very close in range and sound to Michael’s, which made my job much easier. In post-production we had several conversations about whether we could just use Jaafar and Juliano or if we needed Michael. They were so close, they nailed it. We ended up deciding it made more sense to keep with Michael. It kept it more consistent across scenes.

    If we’re to break down the DNA if you will, particularly with the final product, it sounds like it’s mainly Michael’s vocal, and then Jaafar and Juliano are the anchors to attach the vocal to.

    I think of it as the other way around. It’s their performances, with Michael over the top of it.

    And to be clear, there’s no AI?

    No, I’m very much an audio purist. Once you have the best recording you possibly can, you do the fewest amount of steps away from that record. We apply like EQ, and then we apply compression, and then we apply reverb, and then we stretch it. Those AI tools are amazing but there are bits that are good and then all of a sudden it can sound chewed up.

    Working with these actor vocals is obviously a lot more work than lip syncing. How much harder is it to let the actors just lip sync instead?

    There is no one in the world who could do it so good, so tight that you wouldn’t detect something when you see it on the big screen. You would feel a slight discrepancy between the image and the sound. People also forget this when you’re on set, we’re not just doing this song once. We’re going all day, and that’s exhausting.

    When Michael was on tour, he would go on set that night and sing the song once. We’re going to sing it 24 times for every different angle we could possibly shoot it from. We have to keep that intensity that you see on stage during that first take. When you lip sync, what tends to happen is that is the visual performance drops down as well. It tends to turn into a bit of a goldfish, where the face looks like they’re miming as well. You lose the visual part, and then it just doesn’t work.

  • The Athletic: Scottie Barnes & Evan Mobley are already stars. But can they take the next step?

    The Athletic: Scottie Barnes & Evan Mobley are already stars. But can they take the next step?

    Round 1 foes Scottie Barnes and Evan Mobley can’t escape comparisons, or expectations.

    Editor’s Note: Read more NBA coverage from The Athletic here. The views on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of the NBA or its teams. 

    ***

    TORONTO — It took LeVelle Moten only a few moments to understand Evan Mobley’s greatness. He just had to walk into Team USA’s training camp ahead of the 2019 Under-19 World Cup and watch Mobley work, even as he was coming back from a knee injury.

    “I said, ‘That’s what it had to look like when Wilt (Chamberlain) played,’” said Moten, an assistant coach on that team, recalling the camp in Colorado Springs, Colo. “That’s how dominant he was.”

    It took until the final game of the tournament for Moten to fully appreciate Scottie Barnes. Moten had put together the game plan, which included a note to not let Mali’s Abdoul Coulibaly go to his left. The starters didn’t follow instruction, so Barnes, who had offered to come off the bench in training camp, got the next crack at the assignment. Barnes immediately let Coulibaly go left, but knocked the ball out of bounds.

    “I yelled at Scottie, ‘Damn it, didn’t I say (to) make the boy go left?’” Moten recalled. “And Scottie said, ‘Coach, don’t even worry about it, because this MFer ain’t gonna score no more.’ And he was talking to me — but he was saying it right in the boy’s face.”

    The Americans ended up winning Barnes’ 29 minutes by 27 points in a 14-point win, securing the gold medal. Even on a team with the first five picks of the 2021 NBA Draft, plus Tyrese Haliburton, Mobley and Barnes’ gifts could not be hidden. It’s important to remember that, as they continue to nose in front of each other during their intertwined careers, including in the first-round series between their Cleveland Cavaliers and Toronto Raptors, these were hyped-up players who stood out on All-Star teams of their peers. That they exist on the periphery of the NBA’s power structure shows you how special you have to be to get to the inter sanctum of the league’s transactional machinations.

    Even in this series, they have not been the fulcrums, as Cleveland guards Donovan Mitchell (62 points, including 8 3s) and James Harden (50 points and 14 assists) have orchestrated a Cavaliers attack that the Raptors have been unable to stop. Most of Cleveland’s defensive attention, meanwhile, has gone toward slowing Brandon Ingram, not Barnes.

    But Mobley has been a key cog in the Cavaliers taking a 2-0 lead, with Game 3 going on Thursday in Toronto. When the Raptors benched starting big man Jakob Poeltl and went to a smaller, switch-heavy lineup in the second half of Game 2, Mobley dominated. He had 11 points in the third quarter alone, using his size advantage to neutralize the Raptors’ swarming, pesky defense. He’s averaging 21 points on 77.3 percent shooting through two games.

    Calf strains interrupted Mobley’s season a few times during the regular season, part of the reason the Cavaliers didn’t back up their 64-win season a year ago with another six-month waltz.

    “They say development is not linear. It just doesn’t keep going like this,” said Cavaliers coach Kenny Atkinson, miming an undeterred ascent with his arm, before Game 2. “It doesn’t. There are going to be some downs, and I think Evan has kind of got out of that dip and is trending back to improving before our eyes and at the right.”

    However, the Raptors didn’t wilt in Game 2, and Barnes was the main reason why. He had 17 points in the second half, and was in the middle of the Raptors finally able to push the pace in transition more frequently, a necessity if the Raptors are to make this a series. On a couple possessions, he went right into Mobley and fellow Cleveland big man Jarrett Allen, pushing them under the basket in the paint for buckets. That type of force is necessary for a limited offensive team.

    Both, though, have highlighted the promise that they have shown since they came into the league. Can they be the beating hearts of championship contenders? That’s a different question, one both franchises will have to grapple with on different timelines.

    Their careers, dating back to the draft in 2021, have lined up nicely. Mobley went third in the draft, while Barnes went fourth. Barnes edged out Mobley for Rookie of the Year in one of the closest votes for the award ever. And while Cade Cunningham has surpassed both as the guy from that draft who you’d build a team around, both are clearly good enough to be part of a solid franchise’s foundation. There are times when Barnes has seemed like the better player and others when Mobley has seemed like the bigger difference-maker, but neither has ever put the other way behind him.

    That’s the tricky part of all of this, though. Barnes came into the league as the guy surrounded by veterans, joining the Pascal Siakam/Fred VanVleet/OG Anunoby core. One by one, those players left, with the Raptors trying to rebuild more in Barnes’ image: frenetic and versatile.

    While Barnes’ journey to being “the guy” in Toronto has been awkward — he seemed to demur from the off-the-court aspects of the role to start, and his on-court attributes are certainly more Pippen than Jordan — his personality screams centerpiece.

    “Scottie was boisterous. He was talking. He had some of that leadership ability,” said Bruce Weber, the longtime college coach who was the head coach for that Under-19 team. “Sometimes, it had to be reeled in a bit, but you’d rather have that. I always talk about, ‘Do you want to deal with Tigger or Eeyore?’ You want Tigger on your team, because he has energy and is flying around. The successful guys have that energy. That’s why you knew he’d be pretty good.”

    As for Mobley?

    “You knew when Scottie came into the building,” Weber said. “Evan could sneak in, even at 6-10, 6-11. He could sneak in quietly, and you wouldn’t even know he’s there.”

    Perhaps because Mobley’s game was a bit more polished, the Cavaliers decided to accelerate their build right after his rookie year, trading for Mitchell. At times, Mobley has looked like the perfect emerging co-star for Mitchell, a big man who expanded his offensive game last year while winning Defensive Player of the Year.

    This season, there has been some disappointment with his development, especially as his shooting has fallen off from the previous two years. Cleveland is so committed to Mitchell now that if the Cavaliers fail to make it to the conference final, you wonder if they might become impatient with Mobley’s growth and move him for a player more obviously in his prime. There’s a guy who has spent his career in Wisconsin who could be available.

    That possibility, although probably slim, is more of a reflection of how precious Mitchell’s peak is to Cleveland than anything Mobley has or hasn’t done.

    “I think he develops every single year,” Barnes said of Mobley before the series started. “I think he’s grown more into his body. His physicality when he’s driving the ball, being able to create for himself, and defensively, he has all the intangibles. He has super long arms, athletic, he can switch one through five. He’s great.”

    Meanwhile, even though Barnes was already an All-Star in 2024, this was the year he blossomed. His defensive impact reached new heights and should earn him his first All-Defense spot — he finished fifth in Defensive Player of the Year voting. With the Raptors acquiring Brandon Ingram to take over the biggest share of the half-court offence that Barnes is not best suited to manage, his energy in pushing the pace, distributing the ball and playmaking on defence animated the Raptors’ surprise 46-win season.

    And yet, with Barnes at the middle of things, there will be questions. How do you build a team when your best player is not your most efficient or talented scorer? That becomes a geometry question, one the Raptors are not close to solving. It was exposed during this season, and continues to be in this series.

    “He’s a really good passer,” Atkinson said. “I think he’s the 96th percentile in potential assists. You’ve got to keep your eyes open. When he drives, he’s going to find shooters. I’m really impressed (by) the leap he took this year.”

    None of that is to suggest the Raptors will consider moving Barnes any time soon. More likely, transaction by transaction, they will attempt to get closer to a roster that makes sense around him, not that it will be easy because of the Raptors’ other financial commitments. The roster-building mistakes the Raptors have around him, especially the contract extension given to Poeltl before this season that doesn’t kick in until 2027-28, make it possible that the Raptors will get stuck in neutral before they can maximize Barnes’ skills. Those mistakes aren’t Barnes’ fault, but they speak to the trickiness of building around him.

    Cleveland’s relationship with Mobley is a little more in question only because of Mitchell’s presence and the increased stakes. Still, generally players who are as good as Mobley don’t go anywhere. The safe call is Mobley will be in Ohio for years to come.

    “I would like to say they surprised me, but neither of them has,” Moten said. “Evan is who I thought he would be. Scottie is who I thought he would be. I thought, before they were 28 years old, they would both be First Team All-NBA guys. And they’re certainly on the trajectory of doing that.”

    Perhaps. Both will turn just 25 this summer. In theory, they still have some evolution ahead of them. But in a league that is trending toward shorter competitive windows, teams won’t always have the time to see their young players’ futures out — even if those players are as good as Barnes or Mobley. Great young players have never had less time to reach their ceilings.

    ***

    Eric Koreen is a senior writer covering the Raptors and the NBA. Previously, he has written for the National Post, Canadian Press, Sportsnet and Complex.

  • OpenAI Says Its New ChatGPT for Doctors Outperforms Humans in Clinical Tasks

    OpenAI Says Its New ChatGPT for Doctors Outperforms Humans in Clinical Tasks

    In brief

    • OpenAI introduced ChatGPT for Clinicians, a specialized version designed to support clinical tasks like documentation and medical research.
    • The platform is free for verified U.S. physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists.
    • OpenAI said the chatbot outperformed human doctors in certain clinical tasks, according to its own benchmark test.

    OpenAI on Wednesday unveiled a free, specialized version of ChatGPT for physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists, deepening the company’s push into a healthcare sector grappling with staffing shortages, administrative overload, and burnout.

    The product, called ChatGPT for Clinicians, is designed to handle documentation, medical research and care consultations—time-consuming tasks that eat into the hours clinicians can spend with patients. Access is currently limited to verified practitioners in the United States, with plans to expand internationally.

    The announcement arrives as AI adoption in medicine is surging. According to a 2026 survey by the American Medical Association cited by OpenAI, 72% of physicians now use AI in clinical practice, up from 48% just a year ago. The company says clinician usage of its own platform has more than doubled over the past year, with millions relying on ChatGPT weekly.

    Among the tool’s features are a clinical search function drawing on millions of peer-reviewed sources, a deep research mode for medical literature reviews, reusable workflow templates for tasks such as referral letters and prior authorization requests, and the ability to earn continuing medical education credits while researching clinical questions in the platform.

    Conversations will not be used to train OpenAI’s models, and HIPAA compliance support is available through a Business Associate Agreement for eligible accounts.

    Alongside the launch, OpenAI released HealthBench Professional, a new benchmark designed to evaluate AI performance on realistic clinical tasks across three categories: care consultations, documentation, and medical research.

    The company reported that GPT-5.4, running in the ChatGPT for Clinicians workspace, scored 59.0 on the benchmark—higher than human physicians, who scored 43.7 even with unlimited time and internet access, and higher than competing models from Anthropic, Google, and xAI.

    Those results, however, come with an important caveat: OpenAI built both the product and the benchmark used to evaluate it.

    To develop the tool, the company says it worked with hundreds of physician advisors and reviewed more than 700,000 model responses. In pretesting, physicians rated 99.6 percent of responses as safe and accurate across nearly 7,000 conversations.

    OpenAI has been careful to frame the tool as a support system rather than a replacement for clinical judgment—a distinction regulators and skeptics will likely watch closely as the product rolls out more broadly.

    Healthcare represents a rapidly expanding market for AI tools. Beyond OpenAI’s data showing that clinician usage of ChatGPT has more than doubled over the past year, McKinsey data indicates 50% of healthcare leaders report their organizations have implemented generative AI, up from 47% in Q4 2024 and 25% in Q4 2023. BCG research, meanwhile, shows 60% of consumers already use AI for personal health.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Netflix Scripted Series Head Jinny Howe Set as Keynote Speaker at Banff World Media Festival

    Netflix Scripted Series Head Jinny Howe Set as Keynote Speaker at Banff World Media Festival

    Netflix exec Jinny Howe, who assumed the role as head of U.S. and Canada scripted series in August, has been added to this year’s Banff World Media Festival as the year’s first confirmed keynote speaker. The Banff Summit Series is a part of the 47th annual Banff World Media Festival, which this year takes place from June 14 to June 17 at the Fairmont Banff Springs Hotel in Banff, Alberta, Canada.

    “Jinny Howe’s leadership is helping to shape the stories audiences around the world are watching,” said Bell Media president Sean Cohan, who is also Banff’s chair of the board of directors. “Her work exemplifies the creativity, innovation, and global perspective that define this festival, and we look forward to attendees hearing her insights firsthand.”

    Howe has been with Netflix since 2018 and previously served as vice president of drama series. Series launched under her watch include the Emmy-winning limited series “Beef,” the Shonda Rhimes phenomenon “Bridgerton,” the critically acclaimed “Maid” and buzzy “Indenting Anna.” Her oversight has also included “The Night Agent,” “The Diplomat,” “The Lincoln Lawyer,” “His & Hers,” “XO Kitty,” “Sirens” and “Untamed.”

    Upcoming on Howe’s Netflix docket: “Little House on the Prairie,” “The Altruists” starring Julia Garner and “The Hawk” starring Will Ferrell. Prior to Netflix, Howe spent 13 years at John Wells Television, where she was most recently executive VP of television and worked on series such as “Shameless,” “Southland” and “Animal Kingdom.”

    The Banff Summit Series has previously included speakers such as Chuck Lorre, Anjali Sud, Jeffrey Katzenberg, Paula Kerger, Rob Wade, Pearlena Igbokwe, Bela Bajaria, Keith Le Goy, Ted Sarandos and Maverick Carter.

    Spain has been named this year’s Banff “Country of Honour.” The Banff World Media Festival has also revealed nominees for the 2026 Rockie Awards International Program Competition, which takes place Tuesday, June 16, at the annual event. Hosted by Allana Harkin (“Full Frontal With Samantha Bee”), the event takes place at the same time as the Banff Gala Awards. See the full list of nominees here.

  • According to data from crypto trading company Caladan, the Web3 gaming sector is in a downturn! Here are the details

    According to data from crypto trading company Caladan, the Web3 gaming sector is in a downturn! Here are the details

    A major downturn has been revealed in the cryptocurrency and blockchain-based gaming sector. According to a new analysis, the Web3 gaming industry has entered a serious slump despite billions of dollars in investment. Based on data from the crypto trading company Caladan, the report states that over 90% of GameFi projects have failed.

    Despite over $15 billion being invested in the sector to date, the token prices of projects have lost an average of 95% of their value compared to their peak levels. This has led to a significant erosion of investor confidence and a marked decrease in capital flows to new projects.

    The “play-to-earn” model, in particular, has lost its sustainability as user growth has slowed. Even projects like Axie Infinity, once considered a flagship of the industry, have experienced sharp declines in user numbers. The report states that more than 300 blockchain-based games have ceased operations to date.

    Experts say investor interest is now shifting to different areas. Recently, artificial intelligence, real-world asset tokenization (RWA), and Layer 2 solutions have emerged as the main areas where capital is directed.

    Analysts emphasize that the Web3 gaming sector hasn’t completely disappeared, but is undergoing a significant restructuring. Accordingly, it’s believed that in the future, projects with more sustainable economic models will survive, and the sector may evolve into a more limited but robust structure.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • The Ethereum ‘Bank Run’: What’s Happening Between ETH And The Financial Systems?

    The Ethereum ‘Bank Run’: What’s Happening Between ETH And The Financial Systems?

    A new debate about Ethereum has emerged in the crypto community, as members now argue whether $ETH can run the entire financial system. The discussion has caught the attention of pro-crypto lawyer Bill Morgan as well as members of the $XRP community who have long advocated the $XRP’s use case within global banking systems.

    Finance Expert Says All Banks Will “Go To Ethereum”

    Raoul Pal, co-founder and CEO of Real Vision, a US-based financial media company, has sparked widespread reactions in the crypto community after recently commenting on Ethereum’s potential role in the global banking system. Morgan, reacting to Pal’s comment on X, stated that the Real Vision CEO was essentially forecasting that “all banks will use Ethereum.”

    Morgan’s statement, which some interpreted as sarcastic, did not clearly agree or oppose Pal’s rather ambitious claim. Instead, he called it a “bold” prediction, and questioned the real conviction behind it and whether Pal was willing to bet on it.

    The pro-crypto lawyer shared a screenshot of Pal’s statement, in which the Real Vision CEO outlined why he believes Ethereum could eventually play a central role in the global financial system. Pal noted that he found it humorous and ironic that just one to two years ago, many market participants were dismissing $ETH as a “dead” asset, arguing that its relevance had faded while questioning its long-term value.

    However, Pal took a different view, pushing back against that narrative by pointing to Ethereum’s underlying functionality and growth over the years. While others criticized the cryptocurrency, Pal believed the global banking system would eventually adopt $ETH as a core chain.

    He added that this does not mean the future would become a mono-chain world where everything runs on a single blockchain. Rather, he explained that his point is based on how financial institutions typically operate.

    Pal pointed out that banks usually prioritize systems that prove they can survive, perform consistently, and remain sustainable over long periods. He also added that financial institutions tend to favor older technologies, since people are generally cautious of adopting new systems that could backfire and put their jobs at risk. From that perspective, he believes that Ethereum is the ideal digital network for all banks to use, as institutions mostly adopt technologies that meet those standards.

    Crypto Community Reacts To Pal’s $ETH Claims

    Under Morgan’s post, members of the crypto community shared mixed reactions to Pal’s claims that the “banking system will go to Ethereum.” While some agreed with the claims, many criticized it, arguing that Pal has a history of making predictions that are “wrong and misleading.”

    At the same time, some members of the $XRP community pushed back, contending that $XRP is the cryptocurrency more likely to be adopted by banks and pointing to past remarks of support from Ripple co-founder Brad Garlinghouse. Overall, Pal’s statements have sparked a wave of discussion in the community, with skepticism dominating many of the responses.

    $ETH trading at $2,312 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com
  • Ari Emanuel’s TKO Pay Rises to $67.3 Million

    Ari Emanuel’s TKO Pay Rises to $67.3 Million

    Ari Emanuel saw his compensation package at TKO Group Holdings rise to $67.3 million in 2025, a sharp increase from 2024, when his compensation totaled $18.1 million.

    Emanuel is executive chair and CEO of TKO, which owns the UFC, WWE, IMG and PBR, among other assets. His 2025 salary remained $3 million, while his bonus rose to $11.9 million, his stock award rose to nearly $44 million, and his non-equity incentive plan comp topped $8.1 million.

    TKO disclosed its senior executive pay in its annual proxy filing Thursday afternoon. Mark Shapiro, the president and COO of TKO, saw his compensation package rise to $42.6 million in 2025, up from $31.9 million in 2024, while CFO Andrew Schleimer saw his pay rise to $23.1 million.

    Nick Khan, the president of WWE and a TKO board member, had 2025 compensation that totaled $24.3 million.

    As with all executive compensation at large public companies, the amount the executives actually take home depends heavily on the trajectory of the company’s share price.

    2025, of course, was a big year for TKO, thanks to new rights deals it inked for the WWE with Netflix and USA, as well as UFC’s deal with Paramount, which officially began earlier this year. The company also closed its deal for PBR, IMG, On Location and other assets that had been a part of Endeavor Group Holdings.

    The proxy also disclosed some financial details related to Dwayne Johnson’s work with TKO. Johnson is now a major movie star, but used to perform for the WWE as “The Rock.” According to the proxy, TKO paid Johnson $900,000 in royalty payments related to the use of the Rock IP. TKO is also working with Johnson’s production company Seven Bucks on a potential unscripted project, paying the firm an amount less than $120,000 last year.

  • War-driven demand boosts profits for weapons and aircraft manufacturers

    War-driven demand boosts profits for weapons and aircraft manufacturers

    Geopolitical conflicts, including the United States and Israel’s war on Iran and the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, have fuelled surging demand for US defence companies as the Pentagon races to replenish weapon and aircraft stockpiles.

    First-quarter results posted this week from Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, RTX Corporation and Boeing saw limited growth as supply chain and production delays weighed on the industry.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 4 itemsend of list

    Lockheed Martin, which reported its first-quarter earnings on Thursday, fell short of analysts’ expectations, reporting lower first-quarter profit. Net earnings in the first quarter of 2026 came in at $1.5bn, marking a decline from $1.7bn in the first quarter of 2025.

    The Bethesda, Maryland-based defence giant said its aeronautics segment was hit by delays in F-16 fighter jet development, which tied flight test issues as supply chain strains weigh on the company’s C-130 transport aircraft.

    “The combined cost of the rework and schedule extension ran through our programme estimate,” an executive said on Lockheed’s earnings call.

    Sales tumbled as volumes on classified programmes slowed down by $325m from the previous quarter. However, losses were offset by growing sales of F-35 fighter jets.

    The administration of US President Donald Trump has proposed purchasing 85 new F-35 jets in 2027.

    “We aren’t surprised, given management’s desire to be aligned with the customer’s agenda,” said Seth Seifman, an analyst at JP Morgan.

    Lockheed’s stock is tumbling in midday trading, down 5.1 percent since the market opened Thursday, and is down more than 12 percent over the last five days.

    Boeing’s losses slow down

    Boeing, on the other hand, reported on Wednesday a first-quarter loss of $7m, a reduction from the $31m loss a year earlier. The Arlington, Virginia-based aeronautics giant is trying to recover from several years of turmoil.

    Defence and space earnings ticked up 50 percent to $233m in the first quarter. In late March, Boeing was awarded $2.3bn from the US Department of Defense to add onto an existing $4.9bn contract from December.

    Space travel drove some of Boeing’s success in the first quarter amid NASA’s successful Artemis II mission around the moon. The effort was part of a joint venture with Northrop Grumman.

    The company also saw its highest first-quarter deliveries since 2019 in its commercial aircraft unit. Revenue for the unit rose by 13 percent to $9.2bn for the quarter.

    However, those gains were offset by $1.5bn cash burn as it increased production capacity and ramped up certification programmed for 737 MAX variants and the 777X aircraft.

    Boeing’s stock is up in midday trading by 0.4 percent, continuing an upward trend over the last five days at 4.1 percent.

    Northrop Grumman demand expands

    Northrop Grumman, which reported its earnings on Tuesday, showed higher first-quarter revenue, which ticked up 4.4 percent to $9.88bn compared to the same period last year. The Falls Church, Virginia-based defence contractor attributed it to surging demand for its long-range stealth bomber, the B-21 aircraft.

    In January, a US spending bill included $1.9bn for funding the B-21 raider, and in February, the company garnered an agreement with the US Air Force that would expand production capacity of the aircraft by 25 percent.

    Northrop posted a 10 percent increase in organic sales to $1.9bn in its defence systems segment, helped by a ramp-up in the Sentinel programme, its intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM).

    Northrop’s stock remained relatively flat in midday trading on Thursday, up by 0.1 percent, following a nearly 12 percent decline over the last five days.

    Meanwhile, the RTX Corporation, the parent company of Raytheon, in its first-quarter earnings report released on Tuesday, raised both its full-year profit and revenue forecasts after the Arlington, Virginia-based defence giant’s results saw a bump driven by demand for its missile systems.

    Revenue surged 9 percent in the first quarter $22.08bn compared to the same quarter this time last year. Sales in RTX’s Raytheon unit reported a 10 percent increase because of higher demand for both air and missile defence systems.

    In April, RTX secured a contract to supply Patriot GEM-T interceptor missiles worth $3.7bn to Ukraine.

    RTX stock is down 0.7 percent in midday trading and has tumbled 8.1 percent over the last five days.

  • Pope decries migrants and refugees being treated ‘worse than house pets’

    Pope decries migrants and refugees being treated ‘worse than house pets’

    Pope Leo has previously criticised Donald Trump’s immigration policies, calling for better treatment of refugees.

    Pope Leo has criticised the world’s treatment of migrants and refugees, claiming that they are often viewed as “worse than house pets or animals.”

    Leo, who has previously attacked US President Donald Trump’s hardline immigration policies, called for better treatment of migrants as he flew back to Rome on Thursday following a four-nation Africa tour.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 4 itemsend of list

    “They are human beings and we have to treat human beings in a humanitarian way and not treat them worse … than house pets or animals,” the pope said in a press conference.

    Leo, who is the first head of the Roman Catholic Church from the US, did not reference any specific country when calling out the ill-treatment of immigrants.

    The pope has previously questioned whether the Trump administration’s hardline policies are in line with the Catholic Church’s strict pro-life teachings, in remarks that drew sharp criticism from conservative US Catholics.

    Speaking on Thursday, Leo said that countries have a right to control their borders, but urged richer nations to help develop the countries that migrants are leaving, so they do not feel the need to leave.

    What are richer countries doing to change the situation for poorer countries?” he asked. “And why can’t we seek … to change the situations in [those] countries?”

    A woman carries a gift for Pope Leo as he points whilst standing behind her
    The Pope has condemend the ill-treatment of migrants [Guglielmo Mangiapane/Reuters]

    Critic of the Iran war

    Pope Leo also condemned the killing of protestors in Iran earlier this year, after president Trump attacked the Catholic leader for not speaking out on the subject whilst criticising the US-Israeli attacks on Iran.

    “I condemn all actions that are unjust. I condemn the taking of people’s lives,” the pope said in response to a question in a press conference about reports that Iran killed thousands of anti-government protesters in January.

    Leo was attacked by Trump on social media as “terrible” on April 12, after the pope emerged as an outspoken critic of the Iran war.

    In a post two days later, Trump asked “will someone please tell Pope Leo” about the deaths of Iranian protesters.

    Speaking ahead of his tour of Africa, Leo said he did not wish to “debate” Trump and that he did not fear the Trump administration.

    “I will continue to speak out loudly against war, looking to promote ⁠peace, promoting dialogue and multilateral relationships among the states ⁠to look for just ⁠solutions to problems,” he said.

    Authoritarian leaders

    Leo returns to Rome after wrapping up his Africa trip in Equatorial Guinea.

    The pope defended his decision to visit countries known for having authoritarian leaders, with both Equatorial Guinea and Cameroon governed by long-term leaders.

    He said the Vatican maintains diplomatic relationships with the governments in thsoe countries.

    “We don’t always make great proclamations … but there’s an awful lot of work that goes on behind the scenes to promote justice,” said the pope.

  • Elizabeth Banks Got Told ‘You Can’t Direct Men’ Because ‘They Won’t Follow You’ as a Woman Filmmaker

    Elizabeth Banks Got Told ‘You Can’t Direct Men’ Because ‘They Won’t Follow You’ as a Woman Filmmaker

    Elizabeth Banks recently appeared on “The Kelly Clarkson Show” to promote her Peacock comedy series “The Miniature Wife” and was asked about times she was made to feel small as an actor, director and producer in Hollywood. She didn’t hesitate to remember being told that she could not direct male actors if she were to step behind the camera.

    “I was literally told because I direct films that, ‘You can’t direct men. They won’t follow you,’” Banks said. “And then I directed Ray Liotta, who played Henry Hill in ‘Goodfellas,’ and I think I nailed it. Check. It’s all good.”

    Banks has directed major Hollywood studio movies such as “Pitch Perfect 2,” “Charlie’s Angels” and “Cocaine Bear,” the latter of which co-starred Liotta and grossed $90 million worldwide in 2023. The “Pitch Perfect” sequel was a worldwide hit with $287 million worldwide, while the “Charlie’s Angels” reboot in 2019 stumbled with $73 million. Banks has been honest in past interviews about her frustration over “Charlie’s Angels” being reduced to a chick flick by the media. She told The New York Times in 2022 that she wished the film’s marketing “had not been presented as just for girls,” later telling Rolling Stone that’s the only perspective the media was interested in perpetuating anyway.

    “So much of the story that the media wanted to tell about ‘Charlie’s Angels’ was that it was some feminist manifesto,” Banks said. “People kept saying, ‘You’re the first female director of ‘Charlie’s Angels!” And I was like, ‘They’ve only done a TV show and McG’s movies … what are you talking about? There’s not this long legacy.’ I just loved the franchise. There was not this gendered agenda from me. That was very much laid on top of the work, and it was a little bit of a bummer. It felt like it pigeonholed me and the audience for the movie.”

    “To lose control of the narrative like that was a real bummer,” Banks added. “You realize how the media can frame something regardless of how you’ve framed it. I happen to be a woman who directed a ‘Charlie’s Angels’ movie that happened to star three incredible women. You can’t control the media saying, ‘You’re a lady director, and that’s special!’ — which it is, but it’s not the only thing.”

    Banks recalled having to ask for the film to be promoted to men and not just women.

    “I remember having a conversation with someone who was like, ‘You guys are going to have a partnership with Drybar’ — which is, like, a hair-blowing thing,” Banks said. “And I was like, ‘Alright… but could we have an ad during the baseball playoffs? It’s not only this one thing.’ It was interesting to see how the industry sees things that star women. It was a real lesson for me.”

    When asked by Kelly Clarkson if being told she can’t direct man only adds fuel to her fire to do just that, Banks responded: “Yeah, of course!”

    Watch Banks’ full interview on “The Kelly Clarkson Show” in the video below.