Author: rb809rb

  • ‘Stuffed’ Review: Jodie Comer and Harry Melling Sing the Body Eccentric in an Odd, and Oddly Touching, Taxidermy Musical

    ‘Stuffed’ Review: Jodie Comer and Harry Melling Sing the Body Eccentric in an Odd, and Oddly Touching, Taxidermy Musical


    It’s a somewhat telling coincidence that “Stuffed,” a very peculiar new vehicle for Jodie Comer, is premiering at the same edition of Toronto as “Prima Facie,” the film adaptation of the stage hit that won the Liverpudlian actor a Tony last year, but with Cynthia Erivo taking over her role for the screen. “Prima Facie” could have given Comer a chance to dazzle a wider audience with what we already knew she could do; “Stuffed” will delight and/or bewilder a smaller one with what we definitely didn’t, namely Broadway-level musical emoting in a macabre pop-opera about a romance unfolding through the art of taxidermy. She scores points for risk-taking, then, but she also just scores: A high-wire high-concept piece like this stands or falls by the conviction that the actors bring to it, and Comer plays it from the gut.

    So, for that matter, does Harry Melling — an actor who, following last year’s sub-dom romcom of sorts “Pillion,” seems to be making unlikely British indie love stories his niche. Which makes sense, given that he’s a pretty unlikely leading man: His slightly crumpled face, with its resting expression of forlorn, puppyish vulnerability, carries much of the comedy and the tragedy in Theo Rhys‘ endearingly bizarre debut feature, adapted and expanded from his BAFTA-nominated short of the same name. It’s those disarranged features and disconsolate mien that make his character, friendless factory drone Bernie, a figure of fascination for hermetic amateur taxidermist Araminta (Comer); she likes them so much, in fact, that she’d like to fix them in place forever.

    In its briefest form, the logline for “Stuffed” promises body horror of the most morbid order: A woman obsessed with the idea of forever preserving a human body advertises for a volunteer to be killed and made into a fleshly artwork; a man who feels invisible while he’s alive steps forward, believing that once he’s stuffed, he’ll finally be seen. David Cronenberg could have done something vividly disturbing and intimately sensual with this idea, but it’s unlikely the result would have landed anywhere in the ballpark of “sweet” — which Rhys’ film, against substantial odds, actually is, even as its atmosphere of fetid physical and psychological decay turns the stomach a little.

    If making the whole enterprise a musical sounds like something of a tongue-in-cheek stunt, meanwhile, that’s reckoning without the plaintive lyricism of writer-composer Joss Holden-Rea’s songcraft, which feels heavily indebted to the earnest modern school of Broadway balladry. The score could use a few more hummable tunes, but its sincerity is welcome in a film so rooted in extreme strangeness that it needs to dial down the quirk factor in at least a couple of areas.

    Indeed, “Stuffed” takes some time to find a happy medium between the violent eccentricity of its premise and its potential for positively baroque levels of British tweeness. Its opening passages lean in the latter direction, outlining Bernie’s humdrum existence (complete with perfectly banal job in a sandwich factory) with fairytale-style naïveté to match his unworldly outlook, not to mention a hint of Wes Anderson stylization in the superb production design by Beck Rainford (“Ray and Liz,” “Club Zero”), albeit with a thrift-store scruffiness and perennially overcast backdrop to suit the film’s working-class Northern setting. (Rainford also provides ample sight gags for any viewers still tickled by the “bad taxidermy” meme that ruled the web a few years back.)

    Once we getting into the more granular details of these people’s lives, however, they start ringing a little more true — and so in turn does the film. A socially awkward introvert devoted to the single mother who, it seems, raised him well into adulthood, Bernie is now returning her care as she slips into dementia — but when she stops recognizing him, it’s as if his sole connection with another human being has been snuffed out. Araminta, it gradually emerges, has a different backstory behind her withdrawal from the world, though her introversion is of a more confidently, creatively aloof variety. When Bernie responds to her ad, he’s astonished that someone so interesting and witchily beautiful should have designs on his body, even if those designs involve formaldehyde: She practically flatters him into a death wish.

    Yet the more time they spend together, mapping out their exact plans for his demise and preservation, the more they appear to be peas in one very lonely pod, and mutual intrigue turns to affection. Where does that leave the gruesome project that binds them together? Rhys and Holden-Rea’s script — deftly and quite knottily expanded from the story’s shorter format — takes the central relationship through stages that nod, by turns, to the odd-couple romanticism of Richard Curtis and the knife-twisting adult storytelling of Roald Dahl, with a final dose of Shakespearean fatalism for good measure.

    None of which would convince if Comer and Melling weren’t so honestly committed to the bit. Both quite capable singers, they’re alive to the kitsch excesses of the film’s horror, melodrama and musicality, not to mention Holly Rebecca’s suitably mothballed costumes. But they play it just straight enough too: Together, they find a deep, calcified sadness to these oddballs, a desperate need to do something, anything extraordinary, and, finally, a giddy flicker of empathetic self-recognition in each other. It’s that sadness, and that relief, that ultimately dignifies them and their demented mission — and that makes “Stuffed” a more poignant ode to human embalming than anyone might have thought possible.

  • MemeToro Launch Price Prediction: Top Memecoin Traders Buy Position in $MT Top Crypto Presale September 2026

    MemeToro Launch Price Prediction: Top Memecoin Traders Buy Position in $MT Top Crypto Presale September 2026

    MemeToro has entered Stage 7 as traders search for early memecoin projects during September 2026. The presale has raised $122,810.33 toward a $156,312.74 stage target, with $MT available at $0.00430.

    The project displays a $0.05186 launch price, but that target is not a guaranteed market value. A useful MemeToro launch price prediction must examine the required demand, liquidity, product delivery, and selling pressure.

    What the MemeToro Launch Price Prediction Means

    If $MT moved from its Stage 7 price of $0.00430 to the displayed $0.05186 target, the increase would be about 12 times. A $1,000 purchase at the current stage would receive roughly 232,558 tokens before fees.

    At the displayed launch target, those tokens would have a paper value near $12,060. This is only hypothetical math and does not account for network fees, liquidity, price movement, taxes, or the ability to sell at that level.

    The project’s stated target should not be confused with a confirmed exchange order. Once public trading begins, buyers and sellers will determine the real price.

    Several factors could affect the MemeToro launch price prediction:

    • The size and depth of the opening liquidity pool.
    • The number of tokens claimed and sold after launch.
    • The exchanges or decentralized markets supporting $MT.
    • Delivery of the planned AI launch system.
    • Wider demand for $BNB Chain memecoins.

    Calling presale participants “top traders” also requires proof. Public fundraising figures show contributions, but they do not reveal whether professional traders or named whales made those purchases.

    Fair-Launch Code Adds a Clearer Project Catalyst

    MemeToro recently published its first fair-launch smart contract draft. The update added 1,373 lines across 17 files and introduced FairLaunchEscrow.sol, interfaces, test contracts, documentation, and Foundry-based testing.

    The contract locks each round’s terms when it is created. It has no owner, admin role, or upgrade path that could let the team rewrite those terms after users contribute.

    Its allocation math makes insider tokens impossible within the round. Contributor tokens and liquidity tokens must equal the full supply, while rounding leftovers move into liquidity.

    Funds can return to contributors or pass to the planned launch executor for liquidity. There is no coded route from the escrow to a developer or treasury wallet.

    These controls may strengthen the project case behind a MemeToro launch price prediction. They do not establish the future value of $MT, and the draft still needs deployment and independent review.

    Why $BNB Chain Conditions Could Matter

    $BNB Chain has become an active home for memecoin creation because it offers low fees, fast confirmations, established decentralized exchanges, and no-code launch platforms. Four.meme and Flap have helped make token deployment easier for regular users.

    The $BNB Chain Foundation has also backed ecosystem growth through a reported $100 million incentive plan. Some decentralized trades can cost around $0.005, reducing friction for users making smaller swaps.

    MemeToro aims to add an open-source AI layer to this market. Its AI agent scans trends, publishes supporting evidence, creates proposals, and can reject drafts that break fixed launch rules.

    Yet the live contract executor and automatic liquidity step remain unfinished. The project must also connect its manifest to the escrow, deploy on testnet, and obtain a new security review.

    The $0.05186 target is therefore an upside project scenario, not a confirmed launch result.

    FAQs

    What is the current MemeToro presale price?

    The latest supplied Stage 7 figure is $0.00430 per $MT, with $122,810.33 raised toward a $156,312.74 target.

    Will $MT launch at $0.05186?

    The project displays that target, but open-market pricing will depend on liquidity, listings, demand, token claims, and product progress.

    What could weaken the launch price?

    Thin liquidity, delayed development, contract issues, broad market weakness, or heavy selling by claimable presale holders could push the price below the displayed target.

    More Information on MemeToro ($MT) Presale Here:

    Website: https://memetoro.com/

    X: https://x.com/memetoro_mt

    Telegram: https://t.me/memetoro_mt

    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY0jgWy_DtA

  • ‘Stuffed’ Review: Jodie Comer Rises Above a Limp, Gross-Out Corpse-Themed Musical

    ‘Stuffed’ Review: Jodie Comer Rises Above a Limp, Gross-Out Corpse-Themed Musical

    Of the sadly many dwindling artforms whose slow (or rapid) declines we’ve been mourning over the years, the original musical is high on my list of sorrows. Broadway struggles to launch successful new works — meaning, ones not based on a movie we’re nostalgic for, or built around the jukebox catalog of a beloved artist — and they’re practically non-existent on film, save for some arthouse stuff like Leos Carax’s Annette or Joshua Oppenheimer’s The End. We’re starved for new stories set to new songs.

    Culture has also been doing some fretting about the state of the movie star, as one class ages into their golden years and not terribly many actors seem poised to replace them. In that regard, I’ve long been invested in Jodie Comer, a Brit who burst onto the scene in the television series Killing Eve. Following that show’s success, Comer delivered a series of film performances that, in combination with her boggling stage work in the awards-bedecked Prima Facie, had me boldly considering a possibility reserved for a precious few performers: Could she be the heir apparent to Meryl Streep?

    Stuffed

    The Bottom Line

    A gnarly romance set to even gnarlier songs.

    Venue: Toronto International Film Festival (Discovery)
    Cast: Jodie Comer, Harry Melling
    Director: Theo Rhys
    Writers: Theo Rhys, Joss Holden-Rea

    1 hour 57 minutes

    She’s just so captivating and chameleonic, so different in The Bikeriders from how she is in The Last Duel, finding such distinction between one post-apocalypse movie (The End We Start From) and another (28 Years Later). There’s a determination in her eyes, a fiercely committed fire to her choices, that makes me think of a young and hungry Streep in her wild run in the late 1970s and 1980s. The trouble is, Streep first found her footing in a very different kind of Hollywood, one that, amid a lot of junk, made enough films to showcase her prodigious talent. Comer, on the other hand, has arrived in a much more uncertain time in the industry. Good roles are scarcer, financial success has been tethered to franchise output. She has not gotten the roles she deserves, I don’t think, the ones that could finally, for all to see, confirm her as a next great hope. 

    With those two concerns in mind — a longing for original musicals and a wary optimism about Comer’s best-of-a-generation prowess — I went into Comer’s new movie-musical Stuffed wanting it to be a smash. Though it is based on a short film, Stuffed is really a new thing altogether, conceived by director Theo Rhys and his co-writer Joss Holden-Rea, who also wrote the music. Maybe the film could serve a noble double purpose, putting Comer on the right career track and giving a jolt of energy to a languishing medium.  

    Alas, the film is instead a discouraging slog, a mess of cheap shocks and painful lyrics. It seems inspired by some mix of Sweeney Todd and the dreadful true-crime case of the German guys who set up a date so one of them could eat the other. It’s an icky musical, but one that endeavors to find the sweetness — the romance, even — in the muck. To admit to some bias, that particular genre has never really been my cup of tea. But Stuffed serves up an especially acrid brew, plodding along unmelodiously until its foregone conclusion. 

    Comer plays Araminta, a bizarre loner who lives in what could be called, by many standards, a house of horrors, full of taxidermied animals and body parts in jars of vinegar. She’s feared and loathed by the locals, who think she ate her mother’s corpse after she died, and is fixated on her dream of turning a human being into one of the stuffed creatures that keep her company. She puts feelers out online, but it’s mostly fetishists and trolls who reach out to her. 

    Across town, there’s lonely sad-sack Bernie (Harry Melling), a loveless young man who works at a food processing plant and drops in for visits to his dementia-addled mother, with whom he used to be inseparable. He desperately longs to be special, to be remembered, to make an impact on the world somehow. Understandably then (I guess), he’s intrigued by Araminta’s pitch to make him something of a pioneer — the first person to live forever. (In Araminta’s notion of life, anyway.) 

    And thus the two meet creepy-cute, embarking on preparations for Bernie’s great transition and occasionally singing bland and repetitive songs. While Holden-Rea’s core melodies can be pretty, his lyrics are woefully simplistic, as if they were churned out by a rhyming dictionary bot that traffics in the broadest, most generic of sentiments. It’s one thing to hear a character clunkily sing their motivation once, it’s another to hear it time and time again, with so many of the same rhymes.

    The film is also far less risqué than it perhaps thinks it is. Much of the humor relies on the audience chuckling at the discordancy of sweet music scoring talk of death and guts and tissue, amused by the idea these two freaks living in such an ugly and forbidding place could see any of it, or each other, as beautiful. But we’ve been down that juxtaposition road before, in Sweeney Todd, in Tim Burton films, in Urinetown, in Tim Burton’s film version of Sweeney Todd. Disappointingly, Stuffed is not guided by much fresh perspective or narrative ingenuity; a mere oddball premise is not enough on which to hang a whole film. It all wears pretty thin, pretty quickly, and then there’s another hour to go. 

    On the Comer front, at least, the news is better. She finds a way to distinguish Araminta from myriad other weirdos we’ve seen in similarly-hued films, and keenly locates the actual person under all the mannered characterization of the script. She sings quite well too, working hard (and sometimes successfully!) to elevate the banal lyrics to something like poetry. She’s well matched by Melling, who has a voice like an angel, though were I on his management team I might advise him to seek out some more varied roles going forward. Too often in Stuffed, it feels like we’re watching Melling’s character from Pillion unravel after his breakup with Alexander Skarsgard. (And I wouldn’t blame him one bit.) 

    The film is to be commended for building itself from the ground up, but the work is dismayingly slapdash. Rhys creates some nice images and certainly knows his way around a sequence; if only he had stronger material to support all that visual panache. He certainly had a tremendous collaborative asset in Comer, though; she carries the carcass of the film — its inert mass of canned provocation — as far as humanly possible. We leave Stuffed hungry only for more of her.

  • ‘Burgundy’ Review: An Attractive, Light-Bodied Wine Doc With a Good Nose but No Legs

    ‘Burgundy’ Review: An Attractive, Light-Bodied Wine Doc With a Good Nose but No Legs

    “Everything that follows is true. Exactly as we dreamed it,” reads the opening title of “Burgundy,” from award-winning documentary duo Michael Dweck and Gregory Kershaw, with an almost legible wink. It’s a sweet start to a sweet movie, but in retrospect it sounds a little defensive, as though the pair are aware that, especially compared to their last two lovely films — 2020’s “The Truffle Hunters” and 2024’s “Gaucho Gaucho” — “Burgundy” feels less like an incisive portrait of a particular arcane lifestyle than a rambling reverie about it. Amiably riffing on the viticultural tradition of the eponymous winemaking region of eastern-central France, “Burgundy” has more fragrance than substance and even then, too quickly loses its bouquet.

    If dream it is, however, it’s a pleasant one — no night terrors in these terroirs — especially given that the directors, who are also responsible for the scrumptious cinematography, find so much material for their trademark, eye-catchingly pictorialist visuals. As perky ’60s pop songs play, perfectly composed chateaux-tableaux that are so crowded with billiard tables, oil paintings and antique tchotchkesthey feel like slightly sardonic wealth critique, we are first introduced to Bertrand Devillard, patriarch of a winemaking estate that dates back 160 years. Bertrand is a hands-on boss, and even when relaxing by the pool or doing a little skeet shooting, a worried one. His grandson Melchior is more interested in the world of high finance than in taking over the family business that would naturally be his inheritance.

    That there would be plenty of people from outside the clan willing to step into that breach is proven by Enzo, a handsome young man with the throwback good looks of a midcentury matinee idol (he self-consciously models himself after his hero, Jean Gabin) whose ambition is one day to run his own vineyard. For the time being he comes to work on Bertrand’s estate, learning the ropes from the bottom up — cleaning the massive vats, stomping the season’s harvest, sampling wines he could never otherwise afford in an effort to educate his palate. Amusingly sketch-like intros then round out the rest of the cast, which includes Enzo’s eventual girlfriend, Céleste, a trainee sommelier; Patrick, the maitre’d of a nearby 3-Michelin-Star restaurant; and Guillaume, a recently separated wine critic whose adventures in dating, therapy and physio (for RSI due to lifting 100 glasses a day) make him the droll comic relief in a film whose tone is rarely serious enough to need relieving.

    As in their other feature docs, Dweck and Kershaw’s craftsmanship is superb — they’re at least as meticulous and detail-oriented as their proudly finicky subjects. And the deliberately stilted restaging of interactions that likely originally happened in a much less picturesque manner is an inextricable part of their approach. So too are editor Pauline Gaillard’s sharp cuts, which are often timed exactly to coincide with the moment that someone lost in faraway thought finishes swirling their mouthful of Pinot Noir and hocks it unceremoniously into a nearby receptacle.

    Less successfully, this time out the directors further break strict documentary protocol by including some whimsical 8mm footage, usually of Enzo and Céleste’s burgeoning relationship, which is again nicely shot but feels reversed in, as though it was only included as filler when the actual storylines were found to be getting bit sparse. An entire sequence in which the pair go to the movies to watch “Bonnie and Clyde” and then enact their own heist as pastiche versions of Faye Dunaway and Warren Beatty, is just a bit too cute and a digression too far from the film’s ostensible topic.

    “The Truffle Hunters” followed several leathery Piedmontese old-timers and their absurdly touching relationships with their truffle-snuffling dogs. “Burgundy,” by contrast, has no natural source of such effortless, warm-hearted charm and without it, the portraiture sometimes veers closer to caricature. Perhaps for the first time, the limitations of Dweck and Kershaw’s deliberate, constructed style make themselves felt: when messy real life intrudes, the film rather flounders. Enzo abruptly goes off-script, so to speak, and quits the Devillard estate to try his hand at mussel farming and pouf! The narrative of a dedicated striver following his long-cherished dream evaporates at the revelation that maybe his lifelong fascination with viticulture was not so lifelong after all.

    The filmmakers hastily shift course and retool the final third of “Burgundy” as a kind of star cross’d lovers romance, when Céleste also quits her apprenticeship and moves to Paris, and the young, sundered couple can be portrayed as pining for one another. Not only is this pivot a little hard to invest in, given we’ve been burned before, more grievously, it takes the main focus of the action away from the very region and wine culture the film is purportedly celebrating.

    It is possible that true wine experts will respond to those parts of “Burgundy” that unabashedly ennoble the various different disciplines within the wine arts. Film lovers, on the other hand might be left unsatisfied by an approach that strains the limits of documentary realism to no particular end, save to further mythologize an already singularly rarefied sphere. And even if “Burgundy” is for oenophiles rather than cinephiles, presumably they too will be a little let down by a vintage that is fruity and full of promise at the first sip, but that loses its complexity — if not its easy drinkability — long before the last.

  • XRP crypto analyst price projection reaches $60—but one major hurdle comes first

    XRP crypto analyst price projection reaches $60—but one major hurdle comes first

    A crypto analyst has projected that $XRP could eventually reach $60, although the forecast depends on it first clearing a much closer—and difficult—price barrier.

    The projection arrived as former Ripple executive David Schwartz said $XRP could one day overtake Bitcoin. But $XRP did not look like it was going towards that prediction as of the time of this writing on Thursday 10 September, falling to around $1.35.

    Why is an analyst projecting a $60 $XRP price?

    Analyst Ali Martinez believes $XRP could reach $60 if it produces a monthly close above $3.66. His forecast is based on the idea that such a move would end a long period in which $XRP has struggled to make lasting progress beyond its previous highs.

    For this to happen, $XRP would need to rise nearly 170% from its current price to even reach $3.66 and would jump almost 4,000% to take it from $1.35 to $60.

    There have also been comments from Ripple’s chief technology officer, David Schwartz.

    Schwartz was asked, in an X Spaces discussion, if $XRP could take over BTC in total market value, and he said it was possible. He said that for that to happen, $XRP would have to grow faster, not that Bitcoin would lose value.

    It wouldn’t happen from Bitcoin shrinking. It would happen from $XRP growing faster than Bitcoin.

    Schwartz said that the speed and wider range of functions offered by $XRP Ledger may lead to faster future growth. However, unlike the analyst, he did not give a target of $60 or when it might overtake Bitcoin.

    $XRP price faces a more immediate test

    During the most recent trading session, $XRP fell 3.24% to about $1.35, pushing $XRP below $1.40, where buyers and sellers have been competing for control.

    The price is currently sitting near $1.34 – $1.35, and if this fails, then $1.30 could be the next number buyers look to defend.

    Any recovery would first need to take $XRP back above $1.40. It could then face another challenge between $1.45 and $1.50, an area that has repeatedly stopped recent advances.

    Source: TradingView

    $XRP is also trading with caution in the larger market ahead of fresh US inflation data, which could weigh on the expectations for interest rates and thereby affect the demand for cryptos.

    Final Summary

    • David Schwartz said $XRP could eventually overtake Bitcoin.
    • The $60 target is only possible if $XRP manages to close above $3.66, but for now, the challenge is holding onto $1.35.
  • USELESS drops 20% amid rising exchange supply: Is a deeper correction coming?

    USELESS drops 20% amid rising exchange supply: Is a deeper correction coming?

    Useless Coin [$USELESS] retraced part of its extraordinary 529% monthly price advance, plunging 20% in 24 hours as derivatives deleveraging sharply intensified selling pressure.

    The price correction came after an exceptional monthly rally, placing the ongoing decline within a broader price advance.

    Trading volume also experienced a decline of 13.65% to $157.63 million as $USELESS pulled back from recent highs.

    Despite the pullback, $USELESS still retained considerable gains from its 529% monthly price expansion.

    Open Interest collapse confirms leverage flush

    During the price retracement, the Open Interest also dropped 28.46% to $115.29 million, reflecting considerable position closures as $USELESS extended its correction.

    Besides, the derivatives volume had also declined 13.34% to $1.04 billion at the time of press.

    Notably, the Open Interest fell faster than the volume, showing aggressive exposure reductions rather than declining market participation alone.

    Furthermore, the total 24-hour liquidations reached $2.75 million, with longs accounting for $1.53 million against short liquidations at $1.22 million. This consequently left the bullish positions with greater losses.

    Meanwhile, the Binance top-trader positions held a slightly long bias at 1.0787. Further deleveraging, therefore, could extend volatility, although reduced leverage could eventually create a healthier derivatives structure.

    Source: CoinGlass

    $USELESS Spot inflows increase the supply challenge

    Furthermore, the Spot activity introduced additional supply pressure as the derivatives participants reduced exposure. At the time of reporting, $USELESS had recorded approximately $5.09 million in inflows versus $4.29 million in outflows.

    The divergence resulted in a positive netfllow of around $780.88K, implying the exchange inflows exceeded outflows during the observed period. Hence, there was an increase in the exchange-side supply as well while the price faced pressure from derivatives deleveraging.

    Notably, the recent flow readings also fluctuated drastically between inflow dominance and outflow dominance. Generally, persistent positive netflows could reinforce the selling pressure, while renewed outflows would potentially support price stabilization.

    Source: CoinGlass

    Can the demand zone counter the sellers?

    On the 24-hour timeframe chart, $USELESS price retreated towards the broader $0.19109–$0.235 demand zone after facing a rejection at the $0.32881–$0.33665 supply region.

    At the time of analysis, $USELESS traded around $0.23026, placing buyers directly against a significant technical structural test.

    On the technical indicators’ side, the RSI fell to 46.37, below its 57.92 average, highlighting a weaker buying strength after the previous rally. Additionally, the Parabolic SAR also sat above price near $0.32881, maintaining a bearish price outlook.

    However, a strong defense of the demand zone could support another price recovery attempt toward the $0.27522 zone. A successful reclaim of this resistance would strengthen the possibility for another challenge of the $0.32881–$0.33665 higher price zone.

    A break below the $0.19109 support level, however, would instead weaken the recovery attempt and expose $USELESS to a deeper price retracement.

    Source: TradingView

    Final Summary

    • $USELESS has surrendered part of its 529% rally as leveraged traders reduce exposure.
    • Strongly preserving the demand zone could reopen at $0.27522 despite increased exchange-side supply.
  • Unveiling of Charlie Kirk statue sparks chaos in Times Square

    Unveiling of Charlie Kirk statue sparks chaos in Times Square

    The unveiling of a bronze statue honouring Charlie Kirk in Times Square has sparked clashes between supporters and protesters. The life-size sculpture reportedly cost Italian-born artist Sergio Furnari $100,000 of his own money to make.

  • Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    In the latest twist in the Jimmy Kimmel–James Talarico interview drama, the White House is now accusing the ABC late-night host and his network of spinning a fake tale of federal strong-arming.

    Put another way, Team Trump insists there was never pressure put on Kimmel and ABC from the Trump administration to scuttle an interview with the poll-topping Texas Democrat and Senate hopeful.

    “Jimmy Kimmel is play-acting — as he often does — to create a false narrative about this administration’s policies,” Assistant White House Press Secretary Davis Ingle said Thursday.

    “Chairman Carr has not threatened him regarding interviewing James Talarico, or any other candidate.,” Ingle added of Carr, the FCC chairman, just before the second night of Donald Trump‘s GOP midterm convention aka pageant reconvenes. “Any media outlet blindly amplifying Kimmel’s egocentric delusion should insist on proof. Of which they will find none.”

    ABC parent company Disney had no comment on the response from the White House when contacted by Deadline. The lack of response is unsurprising given that the company is the midst of an escalating legal and regulatory First Amendment clash with the FCC over station license renewals and charges of political thumbs on the scale.

    Jimmy Kimmel

    ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!‘

    ABC/YouTube

    Wednesday’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! monologue had some distinct déjà vu of what Stephen Colbert went through on CBS last year with Talarico, who is looking to flip the Lone Star state for the Dems for the first time in decades. The L.A.-based Kimmel revealed that an on-air sit-down with Talarico would not air on ABC tonight.

    After naming off various political candidates including Trump, who Kimmel has talked to over the years, the Live! host put federal regulatory enforcement under the spotlight. “[The] FCC has threatened me, threatened our show, threatened our network, ABC, our affiliates, our local stations, based on simple, traditional editorial decisions,” Kimmel said. “Guest bookings, it would seem, they don’t like.”

    “And so, out of consideration for our local stations, especially our ABC affiliates in Texas who would have to deal with this nonsense, my interview tomorrow with James Talarico will not air on television,” he stated. “It will be posted on YouTube instead.”

    James Talarico

    James Talarico

    Brandon Bell/Getty Images

    Interestingly, Talarico, who is in Los Angeles today and Friday for a series of deep-pocket Hollywood fundraisers, was not officially listed as a guest on Kimmel before the host made his announcement. In a separate interview with MS NOW’s Symone Sanders Townsend today on The Weeknight, Talarico called the Kimmel situation the “most dangerous form of cancel culture.” With the knowledge that much of the consumption of late-night shows actually happens online anyway, the candidate went on to say: “I’m still hopeful that we can have this interview on the air. So we’ll see what happens tonight.”

    Between Trump in Texas and Talarico in California, we certainly will.

    At the same time, with the wounds still fresh from Disney’s sudden sidelining of Kimmel for almost a week a year ago over affiliate fallout from a remark he made about the tragic assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, there is a tendency for some to get lost in the weeds of this. There is also a tendency for some to start shouting about equal-time rules without a read of the fine print.

    The equal time rule requires broadcasters that feature political candidates offer comparable airtime to rivals — if it is requested. Daytime and late-night talks shows have long operated under the assumption that they fell under an exemption for news and news interview programming. But in January, Carr issued guidance suggesting that such talk shows may not be free from the rule.

    The equal time rule also is often misunderstood. It applies to political candidates in a certain cycle. So, for instance, Ted Cruz’s appearance on The View this week makes no difference because he’s not up for reelection this midterm.

    Carr has argued that nothing is preventing late-night or daytime talk shows from featuring a political candidate as a guest. They just have to be prepared to offer time to rivals as well.

    As ABC pushes back on Carr’s investigation of The View, the network’s argument is one of selective enforcement as the FCC chairman has not singled out other broadcasters, like conservative talk radio. The network has also pointed to a 2002 letter from the FCC confirming the show’s exemption from the equal time rule. The network also has characterized the equal time rule as unworkable, given that its stations may be on the hook not just for major party candidates but also third-party rivals.

    Again, let’s see what happens tonight.

    Worth noting that when the now axed Colbert’s interview with Talarico was shifted over to YouTube, it got a huge number of views and the candidate raised more than $2.5 million in just over 24 hours. That might be history worth repeating itself for the Texas Democrat, false narrative or not.

  • 14 genuine Charlie Kirk quotes we’ve fact-checked in the year since his assassination

    14 genuine Charlie Kirk quotes we’ve fact-checked in the year since his assassination

    Real Charlie Kirk quote about Black pilot qualifications circulates online

    Read More

  • Did Trump threaten to turn off Niagara Falls water unless Canada pays tariff?

    Did Trump threaten to turn off Niagara Falls water unless Canada pays tariff?

    Claim:

    A screenshot authentically shows a social media post from U.S. President Donald Trump that said, “Unless Canada agrees to pay a 100% TARIFF on Niagara Falls, we will be turning off the tap to the falls. That’s right — NO WATER FOR CANADA!”

    Rating:

    Fake

    A rumor circulated online in September 2026 that U.S. President Donald Trump shared a social media post threatening to turn off the water to Niagara Falls, a natural landmark famously shared by the U.S. and Canada, unless Canada agreed to pay a “100% tariff.”

    People on social media shared a purported screenshot of a Truth Social post that appeared to show Trump complaining about trade relations with Canada. The text read (emphasis ours):

    NO MORE FREE NIAGARA FALLS FOR CANADA! For far too long, Canada has been enjoying our water, our views, our tourists, and our great American waterfall — NIAGARA FALLS! They get the Canadian side, they take the mist, the water, and billions of dollars from tourism, all while treating the United States unfairly on trade, lumber, energy, and so many other things. It’s a total disgrace! Effective immediately, unless Canada agrees to pay a 100% TARIFF on Niagara Falls, we will be turning off the tap to the falls. That’s right — NO WATER FOR CANADA! We have the control. We have the valves. We can reduce the flow, or shut it down completely, and we will if necessary. Canada has been taking advantage of the United States for decades, getting a world-famous natural resource basically for free while insulting our country and making it harder for American businesses. That ends now! If they want the water, the mist, the tourism, and the beauty of Niagara Falls, they must pay 100% or they don’t get it. No more free rides, no more unfair treatment, and no more taking advantage of the United States. AMERICA FIRST! KEEP OUR WATER IN AMERICA! Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

    President DONALD J. TRUMP

    The alleged post circulated online as Trump escalated an ongoing trade war with Canada, leading many Snopes readers to ask us whether it was real.

    (@CoffinItUp on X)

    The post was fake. Searches of the president’s Truth Social and X accounts, as well as an online archive of Trump’s Truth Social posts, revealed no such post.  

    Addtionally, searches of Bing, DuckDuckGo, Google and Yahoo returned no relevant results from reputable news outlets. If the president had really said he planned on “turning off the tap to the falls,” journalists with reputable news outlets such as The Associated Press or Reuters would have widely reported on it, and those search inquiries would have uncovered such evidence. That was not the case.

    A reverse image search of the screenshot in question found only other social media accounts posting the same fake image.

    The fake screenshot included a watermark for Real America’s Voice, a conservative media outlet that highlights community contributions. However, a search of ARV’s social media accounts and website revealed no mention of a Trump post discussing Niagara Falls. 

    The fake post circulated amid the United States’ trade war with Canada, which has led to tit-for-tat tariffs on goods from both countries.

    It appeared the fake post was created to poke fun at these events, including a real social media post from Trump about renaming Lake Ontario to “Lake America.”

    Snopes could not determine the origin of the fake post or whether it was intended as satire, but its tone and relevance to current events matched the style of other fake Trump posts with satirical origins.

    Trump alone couldn’t simply “turn off the tap” for Niagara Falls, as its water is managed by the 1950 Niagara Treaty, which established a committee that “oversees the water flow over the Niagara Falls for display purposes” and “determines the amount of water available for generating power.” 

    The committee reports to both the U.S. and Canadian governments “and is comprised of government and private sector interests, such as Ontario Power Generation,” according to the Government of Canada’s website. 

    For further reading, we fact-checked a claim that Trump posted an animated video of himself repeatedly hitting Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney with a hockey stick.