Author: rb809rb

  • Offset Says He’s Not Slowing Down After Getting Shot: “I Was Blessed Enough to Be Able to Still Move”

    Offset is continuing to speak out as he recovers from being shot outside of a Florida casino earlier this month.

    The rapper, in an interview with the Creators Inc. Podcast that aired Thursday but was recorded less than a week after the April 6 shooting, in which he’s connected to an IV drip, said he was going to “keep pushin’” and opened up about why he wanted to quickly get back to work after he was released from the hospital.

    “I was blessed enough to be able to still move, you know what I mean? So I’m still moving,” Offset said on the show. “I’m pushing, man, at the end of the day. The grind don’t stop, bro. I don’t want nobody to feel sorry for me or no shit like that. People get shot every day, bro. Like, I’m blessed. I can keep pushing, so why would I just sit down?”

    The rapper, whose real name is Kiari Kendrell Cephus, echoed those comments elsewhere in the chat, saying he was “like the Energizer Bunny” and needed to “keep this shit pushin.’”

    “We don’t got time to be slowing down,” he added.

    When asked what his mindset was like after he was shot and continuing to work, Offset said, “The show don’t never stop at the end of the day.”

    As for his flight to Los Angeles for the podcast, Offset said he slept in a bed on a private plane.

    The musician also shared that he was working on a new album featuring songs inspired by “what happens in my real life.”

    Offset was hospitalized with a “non-life-threatening injury” after he was shot near the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Hollywood, Florida. On the Creators Inc. Podcast, Offset said he was “hit in [his] hip.”

    Just days after the shooting, after Offset had been released from the hospital, he thanked fans for their support and assured them he was OK.

    “Thank you to everyone who’s checked in on me and showed me love,” he wrote in a statement shared on social media. ”I’m good….but I’m planning to be better! I’m focused on my family, my recovery, and getting back to the music…realizing that life is made up of quiet wins and loud losses…. Life’s a gamble and I’m still playing to win.”

  • Conan O’Brien’s Scrapped Oscars Bit Isn’t the Indictment of L.A. Regulation That It Seems

    Conan O’Brien’s Scrapped Oscars Bit Isn’t the Indictment of L.A. Regulation That It Seems

    Many in Hollywood are trying to digest the flight of U.S. film and TV productions from the country, and all the unemployed entertainment workers that have been left in its wake. It turns out Conan O’Brien is one of them.

    The late-night host-turned-podcast extraordinaire turned his attention to the offshoring of American production work in a recent podcast appearance with executive producer Jeff Ross. Mulling the discrepancy between the bevy of shows available on streaming services versus the number of people they personally know who are unemployed, O’Brien and Ross centered on the volume of shows being made overseas.

    But ”I don’t think it’s the whole problem,” said Ross of the overseas production. “I think things got really expensive and out of control in this country, in this town, of all places.”

    O’Brien pointed to a recent bit he pitched for the 2026 Oscars as an eye-opening moment for him. He had a vision for “quick, silly visual” where he would be backstage during a commercial break “rolling on the floor with nine golden retrievers.” He explained, “I’m rolling on the floor with nine golden retrievers and the band plays and then you hear ‘Ladies and Gentlemen, once again your host, Conan O’Brien.’ And then I leap up and a team of a whole bunch of people with giant lint brushes roll me really quickly and I step out onstage and go ‘Hi everybody, cinematography.’” 

    A producer, he says, quickly told him the idea would be “incredibly expensive” because, they told him, “Well the rule is each dog has to be acclimated with the other dog, so they all have to live together for like two weeks, before they can be on camera together. And if they’re living together all their handlers have to live with them too.” The cost, Ross recalled, was going to something like $30,000. “I think it was more than that,” O’Brien said.

    O’Brien added, “In that moment, with the golden retrievers, I thought, ‘Oh, this is a concrete example of something that’s happening that’s making me think, ‘I see why people go to Budapest to shoot something.’”

    While the sentiment seems to indict L.A.’s bureaucratic culture, the only catch is that there isn’t such a clear-cut rule. That’s according to a knowledgable Teamsters source consulted by The Hollywood Reporter about O’Brien’s comment. “I don’t believe that’s a rule at all. Well, it’s not a regulation of any kind,” says Teamsters Local 399 political coordinator Ed Duffy, whose union reps animal wranglers and trainers. “I think the animal trainers probably feel like that’s what they have to do to make it work and train the animals safely and make sure the performer is protected.”

    In other words, a trainer might ask for such a time period or personally require it to acclimate the dogs and train them to do all the proposed actions on cue (in this case, on live television) and keep the performer safe, but Duffy wasn’t aware of a specific federal, state or local regulation on the books.

    Less formally, the American Humane Society, which provides the “No animals were harmed” certification for film and television productions, does call for animals coming from different facilities or locations to “be properly acclimated and introduced to each other under supervision to prevent any stress or injury due to compatibility problems” but doesn’t provide a timeline.

    What is also true is that the U.S. does have a strong animal activism culture that has played a role in changing the norms for animals on set. Wild animals used to be more frequently used in film and television, for instance, but have largely been phased out due to pressure from animal welfare groups. It’s never simple (and often expensive) for live animals to be used on a film and TV production in the U.S.

    And the gist of O’Brien’s argument, that onerous and expensive rules and regulations can dissuade productions from filming in any one place is accurate. “It’s all this stuff that gets built in over time, these different rules,” he said. That’s an issue that, at least in L.A., Mayor Karen Bass, Councilmember Adrin Nazarian and grassroots activists are all tackling. It’s even become an issue in the 2026 mayoral campaign.

    But maybe a clearer example of the phenomenon would have been the fact that, until very recently, all productions, no matter the size, had to pay a flat fee of $931 to apply for a permit to shoot in L.A. Now, at least, a six-month pilot program allows for the tiniest of productions to apply for a cool $350.

  • Morgan Stanley Targets BlackRock With Money Market Fund for Stablecoin Issuers

    Morgan Stanley Targets BlackRock With Money Market Fund for Stablecoin Issuers

    In brief

    • Morgan Stanley is positioning itself as a firm that can help stablecoin issuers manage reserves with a money market fund.
    • The product was specifically designed to comply with the GENIUS Act, and address a “significant increase in stablecoin issuers.”
    • Circle parks its reserves in a BlackRock-managed money market fund, which was valued around $78 billion on Friday.

    Morgan Stanley debuted a money market fund intended for stablecoin issuers on Friday, positioning the product as a way for companies like Circle to manage their reserves.

    The Stablecoin Reserves Portfolio (MSNXX), which is available on days when the New York Stock Exchange is open for business, will enable companies to invest the reserves that back their tokens, the investment bank with $9.3 trillion in assets said in an announcement.

    Although stablecoin issuers often back their tokens with a mix of cash and U.S. Treasuries, Morgan Stanley indicated that MSNXX will also allocate to notes and bonds and certain overnight repurchase agreements collateralized by liquid assets.

    The product was specifically designed to comply with the GENIUS Act, a federal framework for stablecoins enacted last year that mandates reserve requirements. 

    In a statement, Morgan Stanley Co-Head of Global Liquidity Fred McMullen noted the sector’s recent growth, specifically a “significant increase in stablecoin issuers as well as the growing number of assets held in stablecoins.”

    Whether it’s new use cases in traditional finance or AI-agent payments, stablecoins are expected to become a $2 trillion market by the end of 2028, or in roughly 32 months, according to a recent note from investment bank Standard Chartered. 

    On Friday, the value of all stablecoins stood at $316 billion, according to CoinGecko. The second-largest stablecoin issuer, Circle, currently holds the majority of its USDC reserves in the Circle Reserve Fund (USDXX), a BlackRock-managed money market fund.

    Decentralized finance projects like Ethena, which offers a synthetic dollar dubbed USDe, have forged a different path: using BlackRock’s tokenized money market fund, BUIDL. The product issued on nine blockchains was valued at $2.5 billion on Friday, according to RWA.xyz.

    To be sure, Morgan Stanley’s product won’t trade on-chain. However, Amy Oldenburg, the bank’s head of digital-asset strategy, recently told Decrypt that tokenized money market funds are “definitely a path forward” for the Wall Street giant’s product roadmap.

    Earlier this month, Morgan Stanley debuted a spot Bitcoin ETF, which dovetails with the firm’s army of roughly 16,000 financial advisors. Since the product debuted just over two weeks ago, it has generated $173 million in net inflows, according to Farside Investors.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • US Soldier Was Blocked on Kalshi Before Taking Maduro Bets to Polymarket

    US Soldier Was Blocked on Kalshi Before Taking Maduro Bets to Polymarket

    In brief

    • A U.S. soldier charged with using classified military intelligence to bet on the removal of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro failed to pass Kalshi’s KYC procedures.
    • The government’s case will bring attention to differences between Kalshi and Polymarket’s businesses, according to Cole Schotz’ Michael Weinstein.
    • Amanda Fischer, ex-chief of staff to former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, questioned why the CFTC and DOJ didn’t charge Polymarket for the lapse.

    A U.S. soldier charged on Thursday with using classified military intelligence to bet on the removal of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro failed to open an account on Kalshi due to the platform’s know-your-customer (KYC) procedures, Decrypt has learned.

    Although Gannon Ken Van Dyke was allegedly able to place 13 bets on Venezuela-related outcomes that generated more than $400,000 in profits on Polymarket, the 38-year-old failed to verify his identity with the firm’s chief rival, according to a person familiar with the matter.

    In a complaint filed by the CFTC, the regulator alleged that Van Dyke submitted an application to open an account with a prediction market that’s not affiliated with Polymarket, which also facilitated wagers on events related to the removal of Maduro. The regulator also claimed that Van Dyke engaged the platform’s customer support before being turned away.

    Following a 2022 settlement with the CFTC, Polymarket’s international platform officially prohibits U.S. persons from participating, using IP blocking to enforce compliance. The DOJ alleged in its complaint that Van Dyke, who was stationed at a military base in North Carolina, used a VPN to access Polymarket, while pretending to be a user in a foreign country.

    As the DOJ and CFTC push forward with their respective cases, Polymarket’s inability to prevent U.S. persons from being able to use its international platform will likely be on display, according to Michael Weinstein, a white-collar criminal defense lawyer at Cole Schotz.

    “The distinction between one company’s KYC and another company’s KYC will end up being material for the government in prosecuting this case,” he told Decrypt. “They’re likely going to subpoena his efforts to put through the trade with the one that was unsuccessful as well.”

    Americans opening accounts on Polymarket’s U.S. platform are subject to KYC procedures; however, bettors using its international counterpart create accounts using only an email address or by connecting a crypto wallet. On Thursday, the company said in an X post that it identified Van Dyke’s conduct and referred the matter to, and cooperated with, authorities.

    “Today’s arrest is proof the system works,” the platform added, pointing to enhanced market integrity rules to combat insider trading published last month.

    When it comes to Polymarket’s business, the complaints raise more questions than answers, according to Amanda Fischer, policy director and COO at financial-reform group Better Markets, who served as chief of staff to former SEC Chair Gary Gensler.

    “It’s curious that the CFTC and DOJ didn’t charge Polymarket for not appropriately prohibiting U.S. bettors from accessing the platform,” she told Decrypt. “It should raise questions about Polymarket’s move to launch a domestic platform here in the United States.”

    In a statement on Thursday, CFTC Chair Mike Selig indicated that the regulator has no patience for fraud, manipulation, and insider trading. Earlier this month, he also told Politico that he’s not focused on activity related to prediction markets that’s happening offshore.

    “It’s important that we not focus on regulating by enforcement and going on witch hunts offshore,” he said. “The most important thing for a market regulator and my policy aim is to set rules that work for Americans.”

    Kalshi declined to comment when reached by Decrypt. A Polymarket spokesperson referred Decrypt to an X post from founder and CEO Shayne Coplan.

    “We work proactively with all relevant authorities on any suspicious activity on our marketplace,” Coplan said. “This happens constantly behind the scenes, despite what many are led to believe.”

    Editor’s note: This story was updated after publication to include comment from Polymarket.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz’ ‘The Mummy’ Movie Moves to 2027 as Michael B. Jordan and Austin Butler’s ‘Miami Vice ’85’ Bumps to 2028

    Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz’ ‘The Mummy’ Movie Moves to 2027 as Michael B. Jordan and Austin Butler’s ‘Miami Vice ’85’ Bumps to 2028

    Two of Universal’s most highly anticipated reboots are shifting release dates: “Miami Vice ’85,” starring Michael B. Jordan and Austin Butler, is moving to May 19, 2028, taking the previously announced release date for the next installment of “The Mummy,” which features the return of Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz.

    “The Mummy” movie, from Radio Silence’s Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett, will now hit theaters on Oct. 15, 2027.

    Production on the “Miami Vice” update, from “F1” and “Top Gun: Maverick” director Joseph Kosinski, will start later this year. The movie, previously scheduled for release on Aug. 6, 2027, will be filmed for Imax.

    Universal won’t vacate that August date, setting an untitled event film on the calendar instead. The studio also scheduled a new Blumhouse movie for a wide theatrical release on Oct. 8, 2027.

    More to come…

  • Comcast’s Brian Roberts 2025 Pay Rises 4% to $35.1 Million, Co-CEO Mike Cavanagh Sees 154% Bump to $71.8 Million

    Comcast’s Brian Roberts 2025 Pay Rises 4% to $35.1 Million, Co-CEO Mike Cavanagh Sees 154% Bump to $71.8 Million

    Comcast gave Brian Roberts a pay raise last year — but not nearly as much as his recently promoted co-CEO, Mike Cavanagh.

    Roberts, chairman and co-CEO of the media and cable conglomerate, had compensation worth $35.15 million in 2025, up 4% from the year prior, according to a Comcast SEC filing Friday. Cavanagh, who was elevated to the co-CEO role at Comcast effective Jan. 2, 2026, had a pay package worth $71.76 million — about two and half times his compensation of $28.26 million the previous year.

    Roberts has been Comcast’s chairman since 2004 and had been CEO since 2002 before the company created the co-CEO structure. His 2025 compensation included base salary of $2,600,962; stock awards worth $23.5 million; a cash bonus of $8.58 million; $290,466 in personal security services; and personal use of company aircraft worth $190,734.

    Cavanagh joined Comcast in 2015 as CFO before being elevated to president in October 2022. 

    Roberts continues to own 33.3% of the combined voting power of the two classes of Comcast’s voting common stock.

  • Comcast’s Michael Cavanagh Made Nearly $72 Million in 2025

    Comcast’s Michael Cavanagh Made Nearly $72 Million in 2025

    NBCUniversal owner Comcast has disclosed the 2025 compensation packages for chairman and co-CEO Brian Roberts and co-CEO Michael Cavanagh, who served as president until the start of 2026, along with pay details for other top executives.

    Comcast’s proxy statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, showed that Roberts’ pay for his roles as chair and CEO, before the change to co-CEO as of the start of this year, came to $35.1 million in 2025, compared with $33.9 million in 2024. He had made $35.5 million in 2023 and $32.1 million in 2022.

    Roberts’ salary was $2.6 million, but he received $23.5 million in stock awards and an $8.6 million cash bonus.

    If you think that’s a nice little payday, well, it is — but check this out: Cavanagh’s compensation package was worth $71.8 million in 2025, compared with $28.3 million in 2024. He had made $29.6 million in 2023 and $40.5 million in 2022, when he served as chief financial officer until being promoted to president in October 2022.

    The lion’s share of Cavanagh’s eye-popping pay came in the form of stock awards worth a potential $60 million. Cavanagh got about $20 million worth of company stock in March, as per usual. The rest came along with his promotion in December. Stock awards are based on the fair value price on grant date, so they may end up being worth less, more or the same as reported. Cavanagh’s salary and bonus mirrored Roberts’.

    Comcast’s stock dropped around 20 percent in 2025. The company’s revenue was virtually unchanged, earnings per share rose 30 percent, but adjusted net income dropped 6 percent. Free cash flow jumped 53 percent.

    Early this year, the separation of most of Comcast’s cable networks into a separate entity called Versant Media Group, led by Mark Lazarus as CEO, took effect. Lazarus and his team “lead the development of an independent strategy,” while also establishing the firm as a potential partner and acquirer of complementary media businesses.

    The spin-off left Comcast focused on what it has been touting as its six growth businesses, namely streaming service Peacock, studios, theme parks, residential broadband, mobile, and business services.

  • US appeals court rejects Trump’s ban on asylum seekers, teeing up appeal

    US appeals court rejects Trump’s ban on asylum seekers, teeing up appeal

    Judges say Trump’s order for swift removal at the border ‘cast aside federal laws affording’ right to seek asylum.

    An appeals court has ruled that President Donald Trump’s ban on asylum applications in the United States is unlawful, dealing a setback to the administration’s immigration crackdown.

    In a decision released on Friday, a three-judge panel from the US Court of Appeals in Washington, DC, found that existing laws — namely the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) — give people the right to apply for asylum at the border.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    Trump had issued the asylum ban in a proclamation on January 20, 2025, on the first day of his second term.

    But the appeals court questioned whether suspending asylum unilaterally was within the president’s power.

    “Congress did not intend to grant the Executive the expansive removal authority it asserts,” the ruling said.

    “The Proclamation and Guidance are thus unlawful to the extent that they circumvent the INA’s removal procedures and cast aside federal laws affording individuals the right to apply and be considered for asylum or withholding of removal protections.”

    The decision validated a ruling by a lower court. While the judges blocked Trump’s order, it is unclear what its immediate impact will be. Already, the White House has signalled it plans to appeal.

    Trump made immigration a major pillar of his 2024 re-election campaign, pledging to repel what he describes as an “invasion” of migrants by shutting down the southern border of the US.

    Asylum in the US can be granted to people facing “persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group”. Such protections have been recognised as a fundamental human right under international law.

    But unauthorised border crossings reached record levels during the administration of President Joe Biden, which had itself imposed asylum restrictions.

    Millions of migrants — many suffering from gang violence and political persecution in Central and South America — have claimed asylum upon reaching the US.

    Nearly 945,000 filed for asylum in 2023, according to the Department of Homeland Security.

    In his January 2025 decree, Trump suspended “the physical entry of aliens involved in an invasion into the United States across the southern border”.

    The proclamation was quickly challenged in court, as other measures in Trump’s immigration crackdown have been.

    But the appeals court panel concluded that the INA does not authorise the president to remove the plaintiffs under “procedures of his own making”.

    Nor does it allow him to suspend the plaintiffs’ right to apply for asylum or curtail procedures for adjudicating claims of torture and persecution.

    “The power by proclamation to temporarily suspend the entry of specified foreign individuals into the United States does not contain implicit authority to override the INA’s mandatory process to summarily remove foreign individuals,” wrote Judge J Michelle Childs, a Biden appointee.

    The Trump administration will likely appeal the ruling to the full appellate court and subsequently to the Supreme Court.

    The White House stressed after the court’s decision that banning asylum is part of Trump’s constitutional powers as commander-in-chief.

    “We have liberal judges across the country who are acting against this president for political purposes. They are not acting as true litigators of the law. They are looking at these cases from a political lens,” White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters.

  • Tom Lee’s BitMine Buys Another $23 Million in ETH From Ethereum Foundation

    Tom Lee’s BitMine Buys Another $23 Million in ETH From Ethereum Foundation

    In brief

    • The Ethereum Foundation said it agreed to sell over $23 million worth of ETH to BitMine Immersion Technologies.
    • This is the second time that BitMine has bought ETH directly from the Foundation.
    • BitMine holds over $11.5 billion worth of ETH, making it the largest holder of the asset.

    The Ethereum Foundation said Friday that it finalized a deal to sell 10,000 ETH to the largest Ethereum treasury firm, BitMine Immersion Technologies, marking its second treasury sale of the cryptocurrency to the publicly traded firm.

    The over-the-counter sale agreement was finalized at an average price of $2,387 per ETH, putting the total value of the sale at $23.87 million. Ethereum was recently trading at $2,313, down about 1% on the day and 5% over the last week.

    BitMine’s stock (BMNR) is up more than 1% on the day, recently trading at $22.25. BMNR shares have fallen about 3% over the last week, but have risen by more than 7% in the last month per Yahoo Finance data.

    “This sale funds the Ethereum Foundation’s core operations & activities, including protocol R&D, ecosystem development, community grant funding, and more,” the Foundation wrote on X.

    In March, the Foundation sold 5,000 ETH to the company at an average price of about $2,043 per coin. The Ethereum Foundation has also previously sold ETH to another Ethereum treasury firm, Sharplink, with a 10,000 ETH sale last July.

    Ethereum’s price has fallen sharply since last summer, when it hit a new peak of $4,946 and momentum around the coin—and the broader crypto market—helped fuel the emergence of a number of Ethereum treasury companies.

    BitMine is the largest such firm by far, with over $11.5 billion in Ethereum holdings fueled by consistent weekly buys. However, the substantial price drop means that the company is currently sitting on an unrealized loss of more than $6 billion, per data from DropsTab. (Disclosure: BitMine Chairman Tom Lee is an investor in Dastan, parent company of an editorially independent Decrypt.)

    On Monday, BitMine revealed its largest weekly Bitcoin buy of the year, adding $235 million worth of the second-largest cryptocurrency by market cap. The company held 4,976,485 ETH as of Monday.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • ‘Half Man’ Creator/Star Richard Gadd on His Physical Transformation, Taking a Beat After His Back-to-Back Series and His Hot Take on Tuna and Peanut Butter

    ‘Half Man’ Creator/Star Richard Gadd on His Physical Transformation, Taking a Beat After His Back-to-Back Series and His Hot Take on Tuna and Peanut Butter

    After “Baby Reindeer” wrapped production in 2023, Richard Gadd didn’t take a beat. Virtually the next day, he started on his follow-up, the gripping new HBO limited series “Half Man.”

    Now, as he spoke to Variety’s Awards Circuit Podcast, Gadd said he has finally come up for air. “Half Man,” which premieres Friday, is locked. And now, suddenly, he has time to digest the whirlwind of success he has just experienced.

    CALL THE AWARDS CIRCUIT PODCAST WITH YOUR BURNING QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS! LEAVE A VOICE MAIL AT (323) 617-9110!

    “I’m still processing everything,” said Gadd, who won two Emmys for Netflix’s “Baby Reindeer” (lead actor and writing for a limited or anthology series) in 2024. “I haven’t taken a moment. I have a feeling I promised myself a holiday. I very rarely take holidays, but I promised myself a holiday soon, and then when I take that holiday, it might all hit me. ‘Baby Reindeer,’ ‘Half Man,’ all of it. It might just all hit me. I wonder what to do with myself. Because I’ve always got a purpose to get up in the morning, and all of a sudden I might not have one!”

    Gadd spoke to the podcast about his last five years in the spotlight — including his first appearance in Variety; why the title change on “Half Man” (originally called “Lions”); what convinced him to star in “Half Man”; and where the idea for the series came from. He also answers the Awards Circuit Ten Questions, sharing his super hot take on tuna and peanut butter. Listen below!

    “Half Man” was created, written and exec produced by Gadd, who also stars as Ruben. The series is described as about two brothers “not related in blood but the closest you can get. One, fierce and loyal. The other, meek and mild-mannered.” Gadd plays the short-fused Ruben as an adult while Stuart Campbell (“SAS Rogue Heroes”) plays the younger version. Jamie Bell plays Ruben’s step-brother of sorts Niall. Young Niall is played by Mitchell Robertson (“Curfew”).

    Gadd says he was reluctant to play Ruben at first, especially since its so removed from who he is, and also from his character on “Baby Reindeer.”

    “I remember after ‘Baby Reindeer,’ being in every single scene and everything, I just remember thinking, ‘I need to take one of these things off my plate, so acting felt like the thing that I could take off,’” he said. But then it was Bell who suggested Gadd give it a try.

    “At that point I had started to be like, ‘Oh, that would be interesting.’ And then around that time, HBO also said it on a call. Even just from marketing point of view, me being in it sort of helped the show. I remember going home and it really rattled me. Because it was so out from my comfort zone. And so far from who I was. I had this existential sort of evening of thinking whether I should do it. Will I regret it if I say no?”

    Gadd said he underwent an entire physical transformation to turn into Ruben: Bulking up, changing his hair and going with a thicker beard. “I knew I needed to change everything about myself,” he said. “I knew, in a way, I had to do the exact opposite of Donny Dunn [his ‘Baby Reindeer’ character]. In order for people to buy this, I needed to change physically, hair, beard, voice, everything I knew in order to do Ruben. I needed to almost become unrecognizable.”

    It worked. In her review, Variety TV critic Aramide Tinubu wrote that “‘Half Man’ is an excellent but difficult watch. A viciousness runs through the narrative, and countless acts of violence depicted. For those who stick it out, the final episode features one of the most emotionally shattering scenes on television.”

    Where did this idea come from? “There’s a lot of male repression in this day and age,” he said. “And I remember thinking, instead of just sort of showing male repression, male violence, maybe the interesting thing to do is contextualize it. Go back to a less accepting time in the UK. The ’80s are famous in the UK for being that kind of the time where prejudice was really at the forefront of society. So you take two guys right back to the ’80s. You show the learned shame, the learned behaviors, and how they struggled to shirk off these learnings that they have as kids in their adult life. And then you sort of contextualize male repression and violence and rage in the present.”

    Gadd also talked about the show’s ending — and how viewers can decide for themselves what ultimately happens.

    Also in the interview, Gadd takes the Awards Circuit 10 Questionnaire: Sharing his childhood nickname, something he did as a kid he’s surprised at now, his go-to Karaoke song, his secret talent, favorite ice cream flavor, the item he can’t live without, the TV show he’d most like to appear in, and his personal hot take. “Tuna with peanut butter,” he swore was delicious.

    At the start of the episode, the Awards Circuit Roundtable is back — and discussing some of the biggest Emmy news, including how submissions are down and what that will mean for this year’s race.

    Variety’s “Awards Circuit” podcast, hosted by Clayton Davis, Jazz Tangcay, Emily Longeretta and Michael Schneider, who also produces, is your one-stop source for lively conversations about the best in film and television. Each episode, “Awards Circuit” features interviews with top film and TV talent and creatives, discussions and debates about awards races and industry headlines, and much more. Subscribe via Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, Spotify or anywhere you download podcasts.