Blog

  • Has Trump confirmed Iran’s claim that protesters were US-armed?

    Has Trump confirmed Iran’s claim that protesters were US-armed?

    United States President Donald Trump says Washington had armed Iranian opposition groups and protesters during mass antigovernment demonstrations in December and January, in which thousands of people were killed during crackdowns by government forces.

    Speaking with Trey Yingst on Fox News in a Sunday morning phone interview, the president said the US had been directly involved in efforts to destabilise and overthrow the Iranian government weeks before strikes were launched on February 28 by the US and Israel across Iran and as American negotiators were engaging with senior Iranian officials in Europe.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 4 itemsend of list

    As the US-Israel war on Iran entered its 38th day, at least 2,076 people have been killed in Iran and 26,000 injured.

    “President Trump told me the United States sent guns to the Iranian protesters,” Yingst reported on Fox News channel.

    “He told me, ‘We sent them a lot of guns. We sent them to the Kurds.’ And the president says he thinks the Kurds kept them. He went on to say. ‘We sent guns to the protesters, a lot of them.’”

    Trump has often framed the decision to strike Iran alongside Israel as partly inspired by his wanting to “free” Iranians from the rule of the Islamic Republic after it cracked down on those protests in January.

    But his statements to Yingst could lend weight to Tehran’s own assertions that the protests were not organic and “foreign-backed terrorists” had instigated them. Still, analysts warned that Trump’s frequently shifting statements on Iran mean that it is hard to know with certainty the extent to which the US might have been involved in the protests.

    Here’s what we know:

    BERLIN, GERMANY - JANUARY 24: A protester holds a banner reading "All eyes on Iran" as people march in a demonstration held under the motto "Help Iran. No Business With The Mullahs" on January 24, 2026 in Berlin, Germany. Iranian officials have acknowledged that over 5,000 people were killed in the recent nationwide street demonstrations following violent suppression by government forces. (Photo by Omer Messinger/Getty Images)
    Protesters march against the government in Iran on January 24, 2026, in Berlin, Germany [Omer Messinger/Getty Images]

    What happened during the protests?

    Demonstrations started on December 28 among shopkeepers in downtown Tehran who were angry about a deepening economic crisis and the falling value of the Iranian rial.

    Soon, they spread to big and small cities across the country, morphing into nationwide demonstrations as hundreds of thousands of people of all ages took to the streets. Some protesters by then had begun to call for a change in the government.

    Rights groups said Iranian authorities cracked down on the protests, especially on January 8 and 9. Thousands of people, most of them young Iranians, were reportedly killed from gunshots and stab wounds, and tens of thousands of others were arrested.

    Iranian authorities also cut off the internet “to conceal their crimes”, according to Amnesty International, throwing the country into an information blackout for days.

    United Nations Special Rapporteur on Iran Mai Soto said at least 5,000 people were killed and the real death toll could be as high as 20,000.

    At least four people have since been executed in connection with the protests, according to Amnesty, with several more people on death row.

    The protests were the largest since the September 2022 women’s rights demonstrations that followed the death of Mahsa Amini in police custody. She had been arrested for not properly covering her hair. Amini’s death sparked nationwide demonstrations. Authorities were then also accused of firing at protesters and arresting and eventually executing some of them.

    What did the Iranian government say?

    Then-Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said in a rare acknowledgement on January 17 that “several thousands” of people were killed in the protests after days of official hedging on casualty numbers as bodies piled up.

    However, Khamenei blamed the deaths not on Iranian forces but on US- and Israel-backed groups that he said had hijacked the economic protests.

    Khamenei accused Trump of being a “criminal” and of being personally involved in the instigation.

    Tehran has long blamed its enemies, the US and Israel, for fomenting domestic crises, but alleged this time that the US involvement was deeper than usual.

    “Those linked to Israel and the US caused massive damage and killed several thousands” during the protests that shook Iran for more than two weeks, Khamenei was quoted as saying by state media.

    “The latest anti-Iran sedition was different in that the US president personally became involved,” he added.

    Iranian officials later admitted the death toll was about 5,000, including at least 500 security personnel killed by “terrorists and armed rioters”.

    An unnamed Iranian official told the Reuters news agency most of the violence and deaths occurred in Kurdish territory in northwestern Iran. That area has long been home to Kurdish separatists and has often recorded unrest.

    A photograph shows the Iraq-Iran border crossing of Bashmaq.
    The Iraq-Iran border crossing of Bashmaq near Sulaimaniyah in northern Iraq’s semiautonomous Kurdish region on March 11, 2026 [AFP]

    What did the US government say about the protests?

    About a week into the crisis, Trump warned Iran against targeting protesters.

    “If Iran sho[o]ts and violently kills peaceful protesters, which is their custom, the United States of America will come to their rescue,” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform without giving details about what a “rescue” would look like.

    “We are locked and loaded and ready to go,” the president added.

    Then on January 13, he wrote, “Help is on its way,” appearing to address Iranian demonstrators. He urged them to “take over your institutions” while issuing threats to Iranian authorities if protesters were killed.

    Trump’s warnings to Tehran came after the US bombed three of Iran’s most important nuclear sites during Israel’s 12-day war on Iran in June. Trump said then that the strikes “obliterated” Tehran’s nuclear capabilities. Iran launched retaliatory strikes on US military assets deployed at a base in Qatar.

    After Trump confirmed on February 28 that the US and Israel had launched strikes on Iran, he said the primary goal of the war was to eliminate Iran’s nuclear weapons.

    He also linked the action to the January protests.

    Tehran had “killed tens of thousands of its own citizens on the street as they protested”, Trump said. The US was now “giving you what you want”, he said, addressing Iranians he said had been calling for US intervention.

    Are Trump’s actions and words impacting the Iranian opposition?

    Several Iranian Kurdish groups on Sunday denied Trump’s claims of arming them during the December and January protests.

    Iranian Kurdish groups have long opposed the government in Tehran and are seeking self-determination. They share close ties with Iraqi Kurds, who successfully fought for a semiautonomous region decades ago. Many operate along the Iraq-Iran border and in northern Iraq.

    While they’ve long been fractured, several of the Iranian Kurdish groups banded together in a coalition days before the US and Israel launched the war.

    In its first week, Tehran began hitting Kurdish positions in Iraq after US media reported that some Kurdish opposition leaders were speaking with Trump.

    At the time, analysts speculated the US could be trying to support Iranian Kurds to seize parts of Iran bordering Iraq. The aim, they said, could be to create a buffer area that would allow invading Israeli or US ground forces to move in from Iraq.

    However, so far, neither Israel nor the US has launched ground attacks. Opposition Democrats in the US Congress have spoken out against the war and have particularly opposed US ground troops being sent into Iran although the Trump administration has not entirely ruled it out.

    On Sunday, a senior official of the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (KDPI) told the Iraqi broadcaster Rudaw that Trump’s statements to Fox were false.

    The KDPI was one of the groups that the US media reported Trump had spoken with in March.

    “Those statements made are baseless, and we haven’t received any weapons,” Mohammed Nazif Qaderi was quoted as saying. “The weapons we have are from 47 years ago, and we obtained them on the Islamic Republic’s battlefield, and we bought some from the market.”

    The official added that KDPI’s policy is not to “make demonstrations violent and use harsh methods. Rather we believe we must make our demands in a peaceful and civil manner without weapons.”

    Denials have also come from the Komala Party, another opposition group.

    Iran analyst Neil Quilliam of the United Kingdom’s Chatham House think tank, told Al Jazeera that it’s hard to assign much weight to Trump’s statements because of the claims and counterclaims often coming from him and his administration.

    “I don’t think it would be a surprise if it were later revealed that the US had lent support to protesters to try to encourage a revolt. In fact, I would expect them to do so,” the analyst said.

    “However, Trump’s comment reveals nothing material and likely reflects more about him than anything else. His remark about the Kurds keeping the weapons sounded more like sour grapes because they refused to revolt right now rather than pocketing weapons supplies,” he added.

    Still, the analyst said that even as a throwaway line, such statements from Trump are likely to affect the cohesion of Iranian opposition groups and their aim to overthrow the Iran’s government.

  • How US operation to rescue air officer from Iran unfolded

    United States President Donald Trump has announced that the US military has rescued a missing American fighter jet crew member in Iran.

    The Air Force officer went missing in a remote part of Iran after the downing of his F-15 jet on Friday. Its two crew members ejected from the plane. The pilot was quickly rescued by US forces, but a search had to be launched for the F-15’s weapons systems officer.

    In a Truth Social post on Sunday, Trump wrote that the US had rescued the second “seriously wounded, and really brave” airman from “deep inside the mountains of Iran”. It was reported that a firefight between US and Iranian forces took place in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province before the rescue. Iran has not confirmed this, however.

    Here is how the complicated rescue mission unfolded:

    What has Trump said about the rescue?

    While the identity of the rescued airman has not been made public, Trump referred to him as “a highly respected Colonel”.

    He added that the type of rescue mission that recovered him “is seldom attempted because of the danger to ‘man and equipment’”.

    Trump said two raids had taken place, and the pilot was rescued in “broad daylight” during the second raid. It is unclear when precisely the pilot was rescued. The US president wrote that the rescue was “unusual, spending seven hours over Iran”.

    In his post, Trump said he would talk more about the rescue mission during a news conference with the US military in the Oval Office of the White House on Monday at 1pm (17:00 GMT).

    Trump wrote on Truth Social: “This brave Warrior was behind enemy lines in the treacherous mountains of Iran, being hunted down by our enemies, who were getting closer and closer by the hour, but was never truly alone because his Commander in Chief, Secretary of War, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and fellow Warfighters were monitoring his location 24 hours a day, and diligently planning for his rescue.”

    Trump added that he had ordered dozens of aircraft carrying “lethal weapons” to be sent to retrieve the airman, who had managed to evade Iranian forces for two days.

    The Iranian state media said to show fragments of a downed U.S. jet in this picture said to be taken in central Iran and released on April 3, 2026. IRIB/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. IRAN OUT. NO COMMERCIAL OR EDITORIAL SALES IN IRAN. NO USE BBC PERSIAN. NO USE VOA PERSIAN. NO USE MANOTO. NO USE IRAN INTERNATIONAL. NO USE RADIO FARDA. REFILE - CORRECTING FROM "JETS" TO "JET" VERIFICATION: -Reuters was not able to confirm the location or date when the photos were taken. -The red stripe seen on the tail fin of the plane in the photos is consistent with the tail section of a F-15E Strike Eagle seen in file photos.
    Iranian state media released on April 3, 2026, images of what they said were fragments of a downed US fighter jet found in central Iran [Handout/IRIB via Reuters]

    How did the search unfold?

    On Friday morning, the US confirmed that an F-15E Strike Eagle had been shot down over southern Iran. The F-15 is a tactical fighter jet used by the US Air Force that first flew in 1972. Modern variants of the jet cost more than $90m each.

    State media outlets in Iran showed photos of what they said was wreckage from the F-15 and what appeared to be an ejection seat with an attached parachute.

    Trump suggested that the US knew the location of the plane’s second airman and was tracking him as the rescue mission unfolded.

    Iran was also racing to locate the airman. Tehran called on the public to hand over the soldier to the authorities in what appeared to be an effort to secure an American prisoner of war.

    Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps claimed on Sunday that Iranian forces had also destroyed two C-130 aircraft and two Black Hawk helicopters during the operation to rescue the US airman in southern Isfahan province.

     

    INTERACTIVE - F-15

     

    What do we know about the two C-130 planes that Iran says it destroyed?

    The C-130 Hercules and the newer C-130J Super Hercules variant were developed by the US weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin. They are military transport aircraft primarily used for tactical airlifts, troop transport and medical evacuations.

    The Wall Street Journal reported that each C-130 costs more than $100m.

    The newspaper said in a report on Sunday that the US blew up the C-130 jets on the ground during the rescue operation, quoting an unnamed person familiar with the matter. This unnamed official did not explain how the jets were downed during the rescue operation but told the outlet that it was necessary to destroy them to ensure they did not fall into enemy hands.

    Has the US lost other military assets or personnel?

    Yes. This conflict has killed 13 US service members and wounded more than 300, the US military’s Central Command said, but no US soldiers have been taken prisoner by Iran.

    Since the start of the war on February 28, the US has lost three F-15 fighter jets in what it said was a friendly fire incident over Kuwait. A US military refuelling aircraft also went down over Iraq last month, killing all six crew members.

    According to the US military, the last US fighter jet to be shot down by enemy fire before the F-15 on Friday was an A-10 Thunderbolt II during the 2003 US invasion of Iraq.

    At least one Black Hawk helicopter was hit during the initial rescue operation, US officials said, but it managed to stay airborne.

    An A-10 Warthog aircraft was also hit near the Strait of Hormuz a short time after the F-15E on Friday, but its pilot was able to eject before the plane crashed and was subsequently rescued. Iranian media reported this aircraft was hit by Iran’s defence systems.

    Iran has not yet confirmed that a firefight took place before the F-15 airman’s rescue. Al Jazeera’s Tohid Asadi, reporting from Tehran, said a firefight appeared to have occurred in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province and nine people were reported to have been killed in “strikes” there although it was unclear if this was related to the US rescue mission.

  • Taylor Frankie Paul Leaving Mormon Church, Reveals Panic Attacks Amid Dakota Mortensen and ‘Bachelorette’ Scandal: ‘The Last 40 Days Felt Like Hell on Earth’

    Taylor Frankie Paul Leaving Mormon Church, Reveals Panic Attacks Amid Dakota Mortensen and ‘Bachelorette’ Scandal: ‘The Last 40 Days Felt Like Hell on Earth’

    Taylor Frankie Paul is leaving the Mormon church.

    The star of “The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives” and Season 22 of “The Bachelorette,” which ABC pulled amid a domestic scandal involving her ex-boyfriend Dakota Mortensen, shared the personal news on Easter Sunday.

    “The last 40 days felt like hell on earth. Through every panic attack I prayed for strength as I could feel my body breaking down and out from the distress of it all,” Paul wrote in an Instagram caption. Along with the beginning of Lent, the 40-day window before Easter lines up with the incident between herself and Mortensen that led production on “Mormon Wives” Season 5 to go on pause, kicking off the scandal that led to “The Bachelorette” being pulled. Though specific details about the late February incident have not been made public, police investigated domestic violence allegations both parties made against each other.

    The caption was posted under a video stitching together various images of Paul taking notes on the Bible, texting people about her faith and dealing with physical symptoms of her stress. Paul continued, “And HE sent just that in various ways along with so many undeniable signs saying ‘I am with you’ which I can’t wait to share that part. I’ve prayed since I was young and never strayed away because I believe he wants us to ask for help especially during our lowest points. However, instead of just asking I switched over to thanking him at the end of each day no matter how low I felt.”

    And in an Instagram story, Paul more directly addressed her religious affiliation: Though she remains a Christian, she’s no longer a Mormon.

    “Born and raised Mormon (lds) and I’ll always have love and respect towards it. I’ll even continue to go with my family at times, with that being said, it’s time to detach myself from it,” Paul wrote. “I strongly believe in Christ, God, the bible, the divine. I believe we are loved whether we are praying in church building or from a bathroom floor at home. I’ve also experienced grace and love from amazing people that aren’t sure what they believe if at all and that’s okay too. Point being there is more out there to learn. And I’m writing this out as a release.”

    Days after news broke that “Mormon Wives” was on pause because of the late February incident between Paul and Mortensen, TMZ published footage from a 2023 domestic incident that showed Paul throwing metal chairs at Mortensen while one of her children from a previous marriage was nearby. Though the footage was new, the incident had been public knowledge and was discussed in Season 1 of “Mormon Wives”; with Paul pleading guilty to aggravated assault and being put on probation. Still, Disney pulled Paul’s season of “The Bachelorette” in response to the video leaking, saying that the company’s “focus is on supporting the family,” with a spokesperson for Paul later saying that “after years of silently suffering extensive mental and physical abuse as well as threats of retaliation, Taylor is finally gaining the strength to face her accuser and taking steps to ensure that she and her children are protected from any further harm.” Soon after, Mortensen was granted a temporary restraining order against Paul as well as temporary custody of their son. Mortensen has also alleged that a third domestic violence incident took place in 2024. A hearing regarding Mortensen’s restraining order and the allegations between the two is set for Tuesday.

  • Two More Sponsors Pull Back From Kanye West-Headlining Wireless Festival in U.K.

    Two More Sponsors Pull Back From Kanye West-Headlining Wireless Festival in U.K.

    The scheduled three-night headlining appearance by Ye, formerly Kanye West, at July’s Wireless Festival in London is only growing in controversy. The festival’s primary sponsor, Pepsi, announced Sunday that it is withdrawing from its decade-plus co-branding with Wireless, and was followed later in the day by Diageo, owner of the Johnnie Walker and Captain Morgan alcohol brands, stating that it too was pulling out of its sponsorship. Although the statement did not mention the rapper by name, it came hours after Ye’s booking was roundly condemned by the U.K.’s prime minister, Keir Starmer.

    On Monday, two more sponsors pulled back, with sources telling Variety that Rockstar is withdrawing its sponsorship, and the BBC reported that Paypal will no longer allow its branding to be used, although it apparently has not pulled out completely.

    However, all of the brands were still present on the festival’s website as of Monday morning (April 6). Remaining festival sponsors include Budweiser, Beatbox and Drip.

    Either way, the festival’s future seems to be in question.

    The festival had officially been known as “Pepsi MAX Presents Wireless,” as part of a partnership that had been in place since 2015. Although many music fans welcomed Ye’s return to the stage there, Pepsi had also widely tagged in outraged tweets protesting the company’s apparent support for him as sole headliner

    Prime Minister Starmer had made it clear that he, for one, was not ready to normalize Kanye West yet, now that the hip-hop superstar is seemingly returning to touring business as usual in other countries.

    “It is deeply concerning Kanye West has been booked to perform at Wireless despite his previous antisemitic remarks and celebration of Nazism,” Starmer said in a statement to the British newspaper the Sun. “Antisemitism in any form is abhorrent and must be confronted firmly wherever it appears. Everyone has a responsibility to ensure Britain is a place where Jewish people feel safe.”

    Starmer was not the first political figure in the U.K. to raise an objection to the scheduled London appearance by Ye. Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey expressed his view Thursday that Ye should be banned from entering the U.K., saying that “we need to get tougher on antisemitism.”

    And London mayor Sadiq Khan on Wednesday made statements distancing the city’s government from the festival at Finsbury Park on July 10-12. “We are clear that the past comments and actions of this artist are offensive and wrong, and are simply not reflective of London’s values,” a spokesperson for the Mayor said. “This was a decision taken by the festival organizers and not one that City Hall is involved in.”

    The alarm in some circles overseas follows what is being seen as the beginning of a successful comeback by Ye in the U.S. He just played two nights at SoFi Stadium in the Los Angeles area, where he was joined by guest stars including Lauryn Hill, Travis Scott and Don Toliver, performing from atop a giant half-globe in the middle of the enormous venue.

    Ye published a full-page apology ad in the Wall Street Journal in January, acknowledging disturbing behavior that has made him a pariah in recent years. The hip-hop titan said in the ad that he has been getting treatment for a brain condition after last year suffering “a four-month-long manic episode of psychotic, paranoid and impulsive behavior that destroyed my life.”

    He followed that with an interview in Vanity Fair expressing similar sentiments of contrition. However, the magazine acknowledged that the Q&A was conducted by email and not live, leading some to believe ad advisor was writing the answers for him, on top of suspicions that the WSJ ad may have been ghost-written as well. Ye has yet to make any of these penitent statements in anything other than written form.

    It has been less than a year since Ye released the song “Heil Hitler,” which was banned from all major streaming platforms when it came out last May. He subsequently announced he was “done with antisemitism” and issued a new version of “Heil Hitler,” now renamed “Hallelujah,” with references to Nazism changed to Christian lyrics. Previously in 2025, he had sold swastika T-shirts on the web before the site was taken down.

    There was some thought that Ye might address the issues in his SoFi Stadium appearances, but he stuck to the tenor of triumph. ““That’s what 80,000 people sound like, ladies and gentlemen,” he told the crowd at his second SoFi show on Friday. “They said I’d never be back in the States. Two sold-out concerts, baby!”

    He also told the audience, “I want to thank y’all for sticking by me all these years. Through the hard times, through the low times. I love you for that.” The SoFi Stadium shows were his first substantial U.S. solo shows in five years.

    Ye’s three-night appearance at the Wireless Festival are being billed as his first U.K. appearance in 11 years. Some Jewish leaders in the U.K. immediately slammed the booking as “deeply irresponsible,” like the Jewish Leadership Council, which said in a statement to the Guardian, “West has repeatedly used his platform to spread antisemitism and pro-Nazi messaging … Any venue or festival should reconsider before providing their platform to Kanye West to spread his antisemitism.”

    Pepsi has been prominent on the Wireless Festival branding as the “headline partner,” but the festival website also lists a number of other “partners” that may find themselves under similar pressure to stand with or against the Ye booking, including PayPal, Rockstar Energy Drink, Budweiser, Johnnie Walker, Drip, Beatbox, Drip and Big Green Coach. As of this writing none had yet followed Pepsi in staking a position.

    Ye’s latest album, “Bully,” was announced as debuting at No. 2 on the Billboard 200 chart when results were announced Sunday. Critics have noted the album is on the benign side for the artist, as controversial lyrics go, without any of the disturbing content that made its way into recent projects like “Vultures 1,” his 2024 collaboration with Ty Dolla $ign, which debuted at No. 1, or his unreleased but leaked 2025 “Cuck” project, which was to have included the withdrawn “Heil Hitler” single.

  • Artemis II arrives in lunar space ahead of its trip around the Moon

    Artemis II and its four-person crew have entered the Moon’s “sphere of influence,” meaning the spacecraft is more affected by lunar gravity than the Earth’s pull. The transition occurred at a distance of 39,000 miles from the Moon, four days, six hours and two minutes into the mission. The next and most important phase will happen tomorrow when the craft loops around the Moon’s far side, taking humans deeper into space than they’ve ever been before.

    At their apogee, Astronauts Reid Wiseman, Christina Koch, Victor Glover and Canada’s Jeremy Hansen will be 252,757 miles from Earth. That will break the previous record held by the Apollo 13 crew by just over 4,000 miles. They’re the first humans to cross the lunar threshold since 1972’s Apollo 17 moon landing mission.

    The crew spent this weekend carrying out preparations for their lunar flyby. That included manual piloting demonstrations, reviewing their science objectives for the six-hour observation period and evaluating their space suits, which are there for life support in the event of an emergency and for their return home. But, they’ve had plenty of time to take in the views, too — and those views sure are spectacular. In the latest series of images shared by the space agency, the astronauts are seen gazing at Earth through the windows of the Orion spacecraft.

    Orion will reach the moon’s vicinity shortly after midnight on Monday, April 6. Later that day, the crew is expected to reach a point farther than any humans have traveled from Earth, surpassing the record of 248,655 miles from Earth set by the Apollo 13 astronauts in 1970.

    NASA astronaut and Artemis II mission specialist Christina Koch peers out of one of the Orion spacecraft's main cabin windows, looking back at Earth, as the crew travels towards the Moon.

    Mission specialist Christina Koch takes in the view. (NASA)

    The lunar observation period will start at 2:45PM ET, and a few hours later, they’ll be behind the moon and briefly drop out of communication. The spacecraft’s closest approach to the moon is expected to occur at 7:02PM, when it will be 4,066 miles from the surface. “From that distance, the crew will see the entire disk of the Moon at once, including regions near the north and south poles,” according to NASA. The crew will later get a chance to see a solar eclipse “as Orion, the Moon, and the Sun align in such a way that the astronauts will see our star disappear behind the Moon for about an hour.” NASA will have coverage of the flyby starting at 1PM ET.

    Update April 7 at 1:40 AM ET: The post has been updated with news that Artemis II has entered the Moon’s sphere of influence.

  • Technology Giant Sharps Technology Included This Altcoin in Its Financial Results Report! Here Are the Details

    Technology Giant Sharps Technology Included This Altcoin in Its Financial Results Report! Here Are the Details

    Sharps Technology, listed on the US stock exchange Nasdaq, shared noteworthy financial data regarding its cryptocurrency investments. The company, particularly prominent for its investments in the Solana ecosystem, announced that it has generated significant staking income from its holdings.

    According to the published financial report, Sharps Technology generates an average annual staking return of approximately 7% from its $SOL holdings. The company reportedly holds a total of 2 million $SOL, with approximately 95% of this amount involved in the staking process.

    Staking is known as a mechanism that allows users to earn passive income in exchange for locking crypto assets to contribute to network security. Sharps Technology’s high preference for staking points to the company’s long-term investment strategy while also demonstrating its approach to generating regular income.

    Experts note that staking returns, especially on high-performance blockchain networks like Solana, are becoming attractive to institutional investors. This both enhances the network’s security and offers investors an alternative return model.

    The company’s decision to stake a significant portion of its $SOL assets indicates a focus on long-term value appreciation rather than short-term price fluctuations. Analysts suggest that such institutional moves could increase confidence in the Solana ecosystem and create a positive market perception.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Solo bitcoin miner overcomes 1-in-28,000 odds to secure $210,000 block reward

    Solo bitcoin miner overcomes 1-in-28,000 odds to secure $210,000 block reward

    A solo bitcoin miner running roughly 230 terahashes per second of computing power validated block 943,411 on Thursday, pocketing 3.139 $BTC worth about $210,000 despite controlling a share of total network hashrate so small it rounds to zero on most dashboards.

    The miner was connected to solo.ckpool.org, the anonymous solo mining pool introduced in 2014 that lets operators keep their full block rewards minus a 2% fee. CKpool developer Con Kolivas confirmed the win on X, noting the miner had roughly a 1-in-28,000 chance of finding a block on any given day.

    Congratulations to miner bc1qtt7cr9cxykyp9g4hq47zf5lq9t97cxvq72lun3 with ~230TH for solving the 312th solo block at https://t.co/UWgBvLk5AE!

    A miner of this size has a 1 in ~28k chance per day of solving a block.https://t.co/dx3lUuDRbl pic.twitter.com/uiDOzZdHts

    — Dr -ck (@ckpooldev) April 2, 2026

    At 230 terahashes, the winning rig represents about 0.00002% of bitcoin’s total estimated hashrate of roughly 1 zetahash per second as of early April. That output is consistent with a small stack of home-scale ASICs running under a single roof rather than a rented cloud burst or industrial operation.

    For context, listed miner Riot Platforms alone runs more than 30 exahashes, roughly 130,000 times the hashrate of Thursday’s winner.

    The block is the 312th solo win registered on CKpool since its inception, and the first since Feb. 28, ending a 33-day drought. Solo pools have found just 20 bitcoin blocks over the past 12 months, distributing a combined 62.96 $BTC. That’s roughly one solo block every 18.7 days on average, with a longest gap of 58 days.

    The win continues a pattern that has repeated with surprising regularity through this cycle.

    In December, a roughly 270 TH/s miner cleared 1-in-30,000 daily odds to claim a $284,633 reward. In November, a miner running just 6 TH/s, the output of a single old-generation ASIC that would not normally expect to find a block in hundreds of years of continuous mining, beat 1-in-180-million odds to land roughly $265,000.

    And in late February, a miner turned approximately $75 of rented cloud hashrate into a $200,000 reward by pointing just 1 petahash at CKpool for a few hours.

  • Four male cheetah cubs born at San Diego Zoo

    Four male cheetah cubs born at San Diego Zoo

    Odd News // 3 weeks ago

    Oddest unclaimed luggage items of 2025 include robot, meteorite

    March 9 (UPI) — Some of the most unusual items found in lost and unclaimed luggage last year included a robot, a bionic knee, a meteorite and a beekeeping suit.

  • Melissa Gilbert Believes Husband Timothy Busfield Will Be Exonerated of Child Sexual Abuse Charges

    Melissa Gilbert Believes Husband Timothy Busfield Will Be Exonerated of Child Sexual Abuse Charges

    Melissa Gilbert believes her husband Timothy Busfield will be exonerated of the child sex abuse allegations he is facing.

    The actor and director has been charged with four counts of criminal sexual contact with a child on the set and is awaiting trial. He’s been accused of sexually abusing two boys on the set of the former Fox/Warner Bros. Television series The Cleaning Lady.

    “[This has been] hell. This has been the most traumatizing experience of our lives,” Gilbert said on Monday’s Good Morning America, in her first sit-down interview with co-anchor George Stephanopoulos, alongside Busfield’s civil attorney Larry Stein. “Our life as we knew it is done. We are grieving what we had. All of our plans, all of our dreams, all of our ideas, all of our projects. For Tim, it’s done. He’s canceled. Even if he’s exonerated, he will always be that guy. The last person in the world who would hurt a child.”

    She added, “And believe me, if I thought for a second that Tim Busfield hurt a child, he’d have a lot more to worry about than prison.”

    She said she has no doubts of his innocence, but hopes for an apology and an exoneration. “I know this man in my bones. No one knows him better than I do,” she said. “Our marriage has… we’ve had a lot of ups and downs. We’ve been through struggles. We’ve had our own issues to deal with, and we’ve worked through everything. He is nothing if not completely honest with me. I trust him with my children’s lives, with my grandchildren’s lives, my nieces and nephews. He is an honorable, caring, generous human being.”

    Gilbert said she chose to speak out now to address the “untruths” they have been reading about and hearing. “I am 100 percent he will be exonerated,” she said, “but I will tell you that there is a practical side to this and we have to be prepared for all scenarios.”

    Busfield has denied allegations. The charges against Busfield relate to alleged touching on two separate occasions, once in October 2022 and again in September 2023. Each count carries a minimum sentence of three years, which can’t be suspended or deferred. Busfield was released from jail after his arrest.

    Busfield’s defense has revolved around arguments that the parents of the twin boys were looking for vengeance against Busfield for recasting them in the fourth season of the Fox series after they aged out of their roles. “When they were fired, they assumed Tim was responsible for it. The truth is he was not,” said Stein on GMA. Stein was asked about a claim in the criminal complaint that Busfield and Gilbert bought the twin child actors Christmas gifts, and Stein said gifts were given to multiple children at a Christmas party. “Tim did not give the boys gifts. Melissa gave them gifts,” he said. “Every child at the Christmas party, not treating them special or different than anyone.”

    Gilbert and Busfield married in 2013. Also in her interview, Gilbert said she was, however, aware of separate allegations against her husband that were included in the child sex abuse criminal complaint to allege a pattern. The Thirtysomething and West Wing star was accused of sexual assault by two women in 1994 and 2012; charges were not brought in either case. “These allegations have been out in the ether for a very long time,” she said. “I am neither naive nor am I complicit. I talked to him about it. I asked him questions about it. I heard his side of the story, which no one has ever heard, which is the truth. And when the time is right, and that is not now, Tim will tell the truth of all of these past allegations when he needs to.”

    Busfield’s trial is tentatively set for May 2027 in New Mexico.

    ABC News reached out to the parents of the children. In a statement to ABC News, the district attorney’s office said its focus “remains on the victims.”

  • “Thank God”: Writers Guild Members React to Surprise Deal as Drag Out Fight Gets Averted

    “Thank God”: Writers Guild Members React to Surprise Deal as Drag Out Fight Gets Averted

    The vibes couldn’t be more different from 2023.

    In the wake of a surprise deal struck by the Writers Guild of America with studios and streamers and announced on Saturday, arriving earlier than many expected, WGA members expressed gratitude they weren’t about to face another down-to-the-wire negotiation or strike like they did just three years prior.

    The 2023 writers’ strike, widely supported within the union three years ago, has cast a long shadow and many writers weren’t eager to face a repeat of the labor action. “I think everyone’s very relieved,” showrunner David H. Steinberg (No Good Nick) said in an interview. “It sort of came out of the blue that all of a sudden a tentative agreement had been reached and all the writers that I talked to on social media were like, ‘thank God.’”

    “We’re obviously still waiting on the details but anything that calms the industry down is the most important thing in my book,” wrote member Geoff Roth in a message. “The whole business needs to walk back from this existential cliff we’re constantly being told about, as it’s becoming self-fulfilling.”

    The union hasn’t yet released any detailed materials describing the proposed contract language, so opinions could change once members see the fine print. So far, the WGA has only disclosed to members that the provisional agreement will span four years rather than the union’s typical three. The agreement “protects our health plan” with higher contributions and contribution caps and “builds on gains from 2023 and helps address free work challenges,” the union said.

    But what the WGA has said has been enough to get writers talking. The expansion of the contract term from three to four years represents a potentially risky move for the labor group given the rapid changes — consolidation, cost-cutting and the use of generative AI among them — currently roiling Hollywood. An extended deal means that the WGA may have to wait longer to make significant contractual changes if issues crop up in the next few years.

    Most writers who spoke with The Hollywood Reporter weren’t disturbed by the paradigm shift. “The extra year on the term is a bit of a bitter pill given the rapid pace of AI evolution but it was a necessary — and quite predictable — trade-off to save the health fund,” wrote Arrow showrunner Marc Guggenheim in a text. “This is kinda where I assumed we’d end up.” Overall, he’s pleased with what he knows about the deal so far.

    There’s also the issue of the WGA potentially having just dislodged itself from its typical negotiating schedule. The union usually bargains in the same year as performers’ union SAG-AFTRA and directors’ union the Directors Guild of America. It’s not clear whether those two unions will change their customary three-year contract lengths in their own negotiations, which could upset the usual schedule. Bargaining in the same year, the thinking goes, can boost all three unions by allowing them to align pressure campaigns and/or work stoppages.

    That concern doesn’t bother Steinberg. “I’m aware of what the issue is, that you want to be aligned with the other deals to bring pressure if you need to,” says Steinberg. But, he notes, the AMPTP had at the very least been considering asking for a five-year contract term, as THR has previously reported. Paired with the WGA’s usual three-year term, four years “seems like a great compromise,” he adds.

    The relative speed with which Saturday’s deal was struck represented another pivot for the WGA in 2026. The union is known for deploying aggressive tactics like negotiating down to the last minute of a contract’s term and/or taking a strike authorization vote to increase leverage.  

    But the WGA did not, in the end, deploy this longtime playbook. The union and the studios tidily wrapped up their tentative deal within the three weeks that constituted the WGA’s first scheduled bargaining period. (Otherwise the two sides certainly could have penciled in additional time before May 1, when the WGA’s 2023 contract officially expires.) The union never took a strike authorization vote, even to apply pressure.

    The speed of negotiations has prompted some misgivings and nerves in at least one writers’ group chat, said a source. Another source noted that their peers seemed relieved but largely cynical and checked out in this negotiation, compared with the high levels of engagement in 2023.

    Still, many members who spoke with THR argued that industry conditions in 2026 may have required a fresh approach. Writer employment has declined compared with the high-flying era of “Peak TV,” when streamers were more focused on attracting subscribers than earning a profit. And WGA leaders made no secret about the dire state of their health fund, which lost a cumulative $122 million in the fiscal years of 2023 and 2024.

    The WGA was led by chief negotiator Ellen Stutzman as well as co-chairs of the negotiating committee John August and Danielle Sanchez-Witzel and union president Michele Mulroney in talks with the studios, which were repped by the Gregory Hessinger-led Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers.

    The contraction in work “put a lot of stress on our fund because fewer writers working means decreased contributions coming into the plan,” Mulroney previously told THR.

    In 2026, in other words, the WGA was in a very different position that it was three years prior, when its leaders felt emboldened to sustain a 148-day strike in order to reshape payment in the streaming era and establish inaugural protections against generative AI. Its members, many still fatigued from the 2023 strike, don’t seem poised — at least for now — to nitpick their deal or criticize their union for not pushing hard enough.

    “The Writers Guild made it clear that the priority going into the negotiations was to shore up the pension and health funds,” says Steinberg. “So mission accomplished, I guess.”