Category: News

  • Trump admin is skipping international election observers for 2026 midterms

    Trump admin is skipping international election observers for 2026 midterms

    Claim:

    U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration declined to invite observers from Europe’s Organization for Security and Co-operation for the 2026 midterm elections, marking the first time the OSCE had not received an invitation to observe a federal U.S. election since 2002.

    Rating:

    True

    In October, rumors circulated that U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration did not extend an invitation to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, an international body that aims to preserve democracy and human rights across the globe, to observe the 2026 midterm elections. 

    The OSCE explains that its goal in observing elections is to “assess the extent to which fundamental freedoms are respected in the campaign and if the elections are characterized by equality, universality, political pluralism, confidence, transparency and accountability.”

    Social media users who shared the claim noted that it was the first time since 2002, when the OSCE first started observing U.S. elections, that the group had not received an invitation. One post featured an image of Trump with text reading, “Trump demands ‘secure’ elections, yet rejects independent scrutiny and offers no explanation. Perhaps security was never the point.”

    The rumor circulated after Trump’s Department of Justice said it would deploy its own election monitors, sparking concerns from Trump’s opponents. 

    The claim was true. 

    In a statement posted to its website Sept. 23. the OSCE confirmed that the U.S. had not invited it to observe the 2026 midterm elections.

    “The decision not to invite the OSCE to observe the 2026 midterm congressional elections in the United States is regrettable, particularly given the long-standing co-operation with the country in the field of election observation,” the organization said.

    They wrote that the decision was “not in line with the 1990 Copenhagen Document,” which the group describes as an outline of basic human rights and freedoms that “broadens the scope of human rights matters to include election commitments” and “recognizes that the presence of international observers can enhance the electoral process.” 

    The OSCE confirmed in its statement that the 2026 midterms marked the first time it was not invited to observe a federal U.S. election since the group first began observing elections in the country in 2002. That year, the OSCE sent representatives to the Florida gubernatorial election. 

    The 2002 observation occurred after the contentious 2000 presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore that resulted in a recount in Florida. The matter ultimately ended up with the Supreme Court, and the United States didn’t see a president-elect officially declared until that December.

    According to a 2004 article by the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe about the history of the U.S. inviting OSCE to observe elections, following its 2002 observation in Florida, OSCE observed the 2003 California gubernatorial recall election that actor Arnold Schwarzenegger won. 

    OSCE said it has observed 12 federal elections, including six midterms, since 2002. 

    The CSCE wrote in 2004 that the U.S. had formally invited observers to its elections in 1996, 1998, 2000 and 2002, noting that 2002 was the first election that OSCE had observed. 

    In the lead-up to the 2026 midterm elections in November, Trump continued his attempts to implement voting restrictions and pitched giving Americans $5,000 each if Republicans won, sparking opposition from critics. 

    A White House official told Snopes via email that “no other nation has done more to advance the cause of human freedom and representative government” than the United States and added, “American elections will be administered, participated in, and observed by American citizens.”

    The White House did not deny that it had declined an invite to OSCE observers and provided no explanation for departing from decades of precedent. 

    We reached out to the OSCE and the Justice Department for further comment and will update this article if we receive responses.

    For further reading, we fact-checked a claim that Trump thanked billionaire Elon Musk for artificially increasing votes for Republicans ahead of the 2026 midterms.

  • Oval Office spat to public rebukes: A timeline of Trump-Zelenskyy ties

    Oval Office spat to public rebukes: A timeline of Trump-Zelenskyy ties

    United States President Donald Trump has called for the removal of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy after blaming the Ukrainian leader for rising diesel prices, which have put pressure on the Republican Party ahead of the November midterm elections.

    The criticism on Saturday came as tensions between the US and Ukraine have increased after Trump announced a diesel supply deal with Russia.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    “I think it’s ⁠⁠⁠⁠time for Ukraine to get a new president,” Trump told reporters at the White House on Saturday, saying Zelenskyy had hurt global diesel supplies with strikes on Russian refineries.

    “He wants to make problems for our farmers, our ranchers with diesel fuel because Russia supplies a large portion of the diesel fuel throughout the world,” Trump added.

    Zelenskyy on Sunday pushed back, vowing to continue striking Russian oil refineries. “Ukraine will be ready to stop striking Russian oil refineries if Russia stops striking our energy infrastructure,” Zelenskyy wrote on X.

    “It is possible to stop strikes on energy infrastructure as early as today, but (Russian President Vladimir) Putin does not want to do so,” he said.

    This is not the first time Trump has lambasted Zelenskyy. Their tense relationship goes back to Trump’s first term as president, when he pressured Zelenskyy to investigate his rival, Joe Biden, and his son, Hunter Biden.

    Here’s a timeline of some of the occasions when Trump has been critical of Zelenskyy:

    October 2026: In his remarks at the White House, Trump criticised Zelenskyy over the lack of a peace deal while demanding an end to Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy facilities.

    “I said to him, ‘Do what you want. Don’t hit refineries. There’s plenty of targets. Don’t ‌‌‌‌hit ‌‌‌‌refineries.’ And he went out and he hit,” Trump said. “He better damn well stop.”

    “I suggest they get a new leader who can make a deal because he could have made many deals, but for some reason, he never does,” Trump added.

    Trump, who has been urging Zelenskyy to stop attacking Russian energy infrastructure for weeks, struck a deal with Putin on Friday to buy diesel from Russia in an attempt to reduce high fuel prices.

    The deal marked a stunning reversal of years of Washington’s pressure on Russia over its full scale invasion of Ukraine.

    Zelenskyy, meanwhile, said every additional $1bn Russia earns from exports would help pay for weapons components, drone upgrades, missile production and the recruitment of mercenaries.

    Moscow would only be ready to stop when its ability to fight diminished, he added.

    April 2025: On April 15 , Trump criticised Zelenskyy and implied Kyiv had started the war against Russia, saying the Ukrainian leader was “always looking to purchase” US missiles. “You don’t start a war against someone 20 times your size and hope people give you some missiles,” Trump said.

    Then on April 23 , he criticised Zelenskyy for making “very harmful” statements after the Ukrainian president pushed back against the idea of ceding occupied Crimea to Russia in a potential peace deal.

    Zelenskyy had ruled out ceding any territory, declaring, “There is nothing to talk about – it is our land, the land of the Ukrainian people”.

    In a post on his social media platform, Trump accused Zelenskyy of stoking tension by “boasting” that Kyiv would not legally recognise ceding Crimea to Russia.

    “This statement is very harmful to the Peace Negotiations with Russia,” Trump said, adding that Russia invaded the Crimean Peninsula and annexed it back in 2014 “without a shot being fired”.

    “It’s inflammatory statements like Zelenskyy’s that makes it so difficult to settle this War,” Trump said. “He can have Peace or, he can fight for another three years before losing the whole Country.”

    Despite the tension, the two leaders held a private meeting at the Vatican on April 26, 2025, during Pope Francis’s funeral.

    Feb 28, 2025: During their fiery Oval Office meeting, Trump and Vice President JD Vance clashed with Zelenskyy over rare earth mineral agreements, security assurances and peace negotiations with Russia.

    Trump warned Zelenskyy, “You’re either going to make a deal [on ending the war with Russia] or we’re out,” and accused the Ukrainian leader of having “disrespected” the United States and “overplayed his hand”.

    The US president and Vance also berated Zelenskyy for lacking gratitude and refusing to compromise to end the war, with Trump arguing that Zelenskyy was unready for peace.

    The meeting devolved into a shouting match and Zelenskyy departed the White House abruptly.

    February 19, 2025: A month after returning to power for a second term, Trump called the Ukrainian president a “dictator without elections” and accused him of wanting to keep the “gravy train” of US military support going while Washington tries to end the war with Russia.

    In a lengthy and scathing post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump accused Zelenskyy of taking US money and embroiling the country in an endless conflict.

    He later doubled down on those comments, telling an audience at an investment summit in Miami that Zelenskyy had “done a terrible job, his country is shattered, and millions and millions of people have unnecessarily died”.

    “A dictator without elections. Zelenskyy better move fast or he’s not going to have a country left. Gotta move. Gotta move fast cause that war’s going in the wrong direction,” Trump said on stage at the Future Investment Initiative (FII) Institute summit.

    “In the meantime, we’re successfully negotiating an end to the war with Russia. Something I’ll admit that only Trump is going to be able to do and the Trump administration – we’re going to be able to do it. I think Putin even admitted that,” he said.

    “Biden never tried. Europe has failed to bring peace and Zelenskyy probably wants to, maybe he wants to keep the gravy train going. I don’t know what’s the problem, but he has been able. He’s very upset,” he added.

    Trump had been critical of Biden’s financial and military support to Ukraine during the war. He had vowed to end the war within 24 hours of his taking office, but later said he was being “sarcastic”.

    2024 Campaign trail: On the 2024 US presidential election campaign trail, Trump repeatedly criticised Zelenskyy for not trying hard enough to end Russia’s war on Ukraine. In September, at an election rally speech in North Carolina, Trump lashed out at Zelenskyy for refusing to negotiate, stating that even the “worst deal” or giving up a small amount of territory would be better than ongoing death and destruction.

    July 2019: During his first term, Trump repeatedly urged Zelenskyy to work with Rudy Giuliani and the US attorney general to investigate Democratic political rival Joe Biden. That is according to a five-page memo summarising the July 25 call.

    At the time of the call, the Trump administration was also withholding from Ukraine nearly $400m in congressionally approved security assistance, prompting speculation the US president was using the money as leverage to get his desired investigations.

    Zelenskyy expressed willingness to look into new cases and cooperate with US investigations, though he and Ukrainian officials later maintained they did not feel directly threatened or pressured during the conversation itself.

  • Judge Orders Trump Administration To Stop Running Taxpayer Funded Ads That Promote POTUS

    Judge Orders Trump Administration To Stop Running Taxpayer Funded Ads That Promote POTUS

    A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to stop running taxpayer-funded ads for at least 14 days, putting a halt to the spots that resemble campaign messaging.

    U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon granted a temporary restraining order that prohibits Trump officials from using funds appropriated to the Department of Homeland Security for the ads. The order also will force the administration to cancel the rest of a $20 million purchase of ad time.

    Common Cause, Robert Hunter, Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ and Empire State 32BJ SEIU PAC filed suit to halt the spots, arguing that the ads were overtly political yet were paid for with taxpayer funds. In one case, one of the ads that has been running was almost identical to one that was made for Trump’s 2024 campaign.

    The plaintiffs “have demonstrated that they are likely to succeed on the merits, will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction, the balance of the equities tips in their favor, and an injunction serves the public interest,” the judge wrote.

    The plaintiffs’ coalition said in a statement, “We are pleased the court acted swiftly to prevent more taxpayer dollars from being used for such blatantly unlawful political propaganda. There is no legal justification — and no precedent — for the president to use the machinery of the government and funds set aside by Congress for other uses to influence electoral outcomes that further his own agenda.”

    In a filing before the judge issued her order, the Department of Homeland Security stated that the ads would not continue past Sunday.

    Trump announced last week that his political action committee, MAGA Inc., would start funding the advertising campaign, but he did not say whether the federal government would be reimbursed for the costs already incurred.

    The administration had previously argued that the ads were public service announcements, in line with past presidents. But past administrations produced PSAs to promote programs like the Affordable Care Act and initiatives like vaccinations against Covid.

  • Did CIA offer buyout to entire workforce? What we know

    Did CIA offer buyout to entire workforce? What we know

    • A rumor spread in the fall of 2026 that the CIA offered eight months’ pay and benefits to employees who agree to quit. The rumor is not new. It first started to spread early in 2025, shortly after U.S. President Donald Trump took office for the second time.
    • The rumor stems from a Feb. 4, 2025, Wall Street Journal report that cited “officials” as saying the scheme was a “bid to bring the agency in line with President Trump’s priorities,” that is, downsizing the government. The report also said the CIA was “freezing the hiring for job seekers already given a conditional offer.” 
    • Since then, further reporting has indicated that in May 2025, CIA Director John Ratcliff announced he intended to cut 1,200 jobs. More recently, in August 2026, an article from the Washington Post said many CIA employees who took the buyouts were still awaiting their retirement due to the sheer number of departures from the agency. The CIA does not release exact staffing numbers.
    • Snopes has not rated the claim because we have not yet independently verified the reporting. We have reached out to the CIA asking for information about the buyout scheme and its current status, and we will update this story if we learn more. 

    In October 2026, social media posts multiplied claiming the CIA offered eight months’ pay and benefits to employees who agree to quit. 

    Several posts on Facebook and X included a video of Fox News presenter Jesse Watters saying, “The Wall Street Journal has reported the CIA has reportedly just offered a buyout to its entire workforce” (archived):

    (X user @WikiLeaksQ)

    The claim is not new. It has been circulating since at least February 2025. 

    The rumor stems from a Feb. 4, 2025, article from the Wall Street Journal that cited “officials” as saying the scheme was a “bid to bring the agency in line with President Trump’s priorities” — namely, downsizing the government. The story also said the CIA was “freezing the hiring of job seekers already given a conditional offer.” 

    The report also quoted an unnamed CIA spokesperson as saying “the move was part of an effort to ‘infuse the agency with renewed energy.’”

    We could not corroborate the report independently, so we left it unrated.

    We reached out to the CIA for more details on staffing plans and we will update this story should we receive a response. 

    Since the publication of the Wall Street Journal article, more reporting has appeared on the staffing situation at the CIA. Layoffs started as soon as March 2025, according to The Associated Press.

    Further, in May 2025, the Washington Post reported that the agency’s then-new Director John Ratcliff had announced he wanted to slash 1,200 at the organization, which works to gather foreign intelligence. 

    “The CIA does not publicly disclose the size of its workforce, but it is believed to be about 22,000,” the report read. “It is unclear which parts of the spy agency would be most affected.”

    Then, in August 2026, another story from the Washington Post said the intelligence agency was struggling to keep up with demands for retirements from former employees due to the sheer number of departures. 

    The agency “gave retirees two toll-free numbers to call if more than six months had passed since they’d received their final paycheck,” the article read. “One former official said she recently spoke to a colleague who retired in March and had just received their first, partial retirement check.”

    For further reading, Snopes has covered several claims about the CIA over the years, including the rumor that late feminist Gloria Steinem had worked for the agency.

  • 6 claims about lab-grown and genetically modified foods we’ve fact-checked

    6 claims about lab-grown and genetically modified foods we’ve fact-checked

    Christensen, Laerke. “Rumors Are Swirling about ‘lab-Grown’ Eggs Being Sold in the US. Here’s What to Know.” Snopes, 21 Aug. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/lab-grown-us-eggs/.

    Deng, Rae. “Bill Gates-Backed Company Created Lab-Made Butter.” Snopes, 15 Aug. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/bill-gates-butter/.

    Loe, Megan. “Inspecting Claims Campbell’s Soup Uses ‘bioengineered Meat’ and ‘3-D Printed Chicken.’” Snopes, 25 Nov. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//news/2025/11/25/campbells-soup-bioengineered-meat/.

    Rascouët-Paz, Anna. “Dutch Factory Is 3D-Printing Meat from Stem Cells?” Snopes, 29 Mar. 2024, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/3d-printed-meat-netherlands/.

    Winter, Emery. “Are US Stores Selling 3D-Printed Meat?” Snopes, 7 Oct. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/us-stores-3d-meat/.

    Wrona, Aleksandra. “Did Bill Gates Donate $50M to Create ‘biologically Modified’ Crops? Here’s the Truth.” Snopes, 9 Mar. 2026, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/bill-gates-modified-crops/.

    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070723/. Accessed 7 Oct. 2026.

  • Did 163 Democrats use same Oklahoma address to vote for Biden in 2020? There’s no proof

    Did 163 Democrats use same Oklahoma address to vote for Biden in 2020? There’s no proof

    • A meme alleges 163 Democratic Party votes for former U.S. President Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory all came from the same Oklahoma address — a home displayed in the image.
    • As of this writing, we have not yet located enough evidence to conclusively confirm or debunk what appears to be a false or unfounded rumor.
    • Searches located no news media outlets reporting on the matter, nor any social media posts promoting the rumor prior to 2026.
    • A reverse-image search found the same house pictured in the meme located in the rural town of Stratford, Oklahoma.
    • Snopes emailed the Oklahoma State Election Board and other officials to ask whether they were aware of any such election-related crimes occurring in relation to the home address. We will update this article if we locate or receive any further credible information.

    Since at least February, people have shared a meme alleging that 163 Democratic Party votes for former U.S. President Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory all came from the same Oklahoma address.

    The rumor touched on President Donald Trump’s long-standing false claims that fraud plagued the 2020 election in battleground states. In 2021, The Associated Press investigated all of Trump’s claims in six key states and found nowhere near the amount of fraud needed for Trump to have won.

    In an email, a Snopes reader shared the meme, which featured an image of a modest single-level home in a rural-looking setting with a one-car garage and what appears to be a twin-size mattress leaning against the wall on the front porch.

    The meme read, “Why do we need voter ID? Because in the 2020 election, 163 Democrats used this one address to cast a vote for Joe Biden.” The reader asked, “Any truth to this?”

    A reverse-image search found other people sharing the same meme both in Facebook posts (archived) and comments (archived), as well as on LinkedIn (archived), Reddit (archived), Threads (archived) and X (archived).

    (@250_Revolution via X)

    As of this writing, we have not yet located enough evidence to conclusively debunk (or confirm) what appears to be a false rumor. We also have not yet determined who created the meme, which we found showed a house in rural Oklahoma. As such, we have not added a fact-check rating to this story.

    Researching the meme and finding the house

    Searches of Bing, DuckDuckGo, Google and Yahoo found no news media outlets or political blogs reporting about 163 votes being cast for Biden using the address of the home pictured in the meme. That complete lack of reporting included conservative blogs, which would widely report on such a purported Democratic Party election fraud attempt — had it actually happened. Our searches also failed to locate evidence of users promoting the rumor prior to this year, more than five years after the 2020 election concluded.

    A reverse-image search for the home pictured in the meme found real estate listings displaying a similar photo of the same house, for example on Realtor.com. The listings featured the address 401 N. Sycamore Ave. in the town of Stratford, Oklahoma, in Garvin County. The home appeared in Google Maps Street View on the east side of Sycamore.

    Snopes emailed the Oklahoma State Election Board, a Garvin County elections official and the Garvin County Sheriff’s Office. We presented the claim and asked whether officials were aware of any such election-related crimes occurring in relation to the home address.

    We will update this article if we locate or receive any further credible information.

    Trump secured more votes than Biden in every county in Oklahoma in the 2020 election, defeating Biden by a margin of more than 2-to-1. Trump also earned more than 81% of the vote in Garvin County.

    For further reading, we previously reported about a rumor that Trump thanked tech billionaire Elon Musk for making every Republican vote count three times.

    Sources

    “401 N Sycamore Ave, Stratford, OK 74872.” Realtor.com, https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/Sycamore_Stratford_OK_74872_M72775-10001.

    Cassidy, Christina A. “Far Too Little Vote Fraud to Tip Election to Trump, AP Finds.” The Associated Press, 14 Dec. 2021, https://apnews.com/article/voter-fraud-election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-7fcb6f134e528fee8237c7601db3328f.

    Google Maps. https://www.google.com/maps.

    “Oklahoma Presidential Results.” CNN, 2020, https://www.cnn.com/election/2020/results/state/oklahoma/president.

    “Presidential Results.” CNN, 2020, https://www.cnn.com/election/2020/results/president.

  • Turkey gravy brand sold in Canada recalled due to undeclared mustard

    Turkey gravy brand sold in Canada recalled due to undeclared mustard

    Manitoba

    A brand of turkey gravy sold in Canada has been recalled because it contains undeclared mustard.

    Kevin’s Natural Foods turkey gravy sold in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba and Saskatchewan

    Text to Speech Icon

    Listen to this article

    Estimated 1 minute

    The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.

    A full gravy boat.
    A gravy boat is shown in a file image. Kevin’s Natural Foods turkey gravy has been recalled in Canada because the product contains mustard, which is not included on its label, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency says. (Matthew Mead/The Associated Press)

    A brand of turkey gravy sold in Canada has been recalled because it contains undeclared mustard.

    Kevin’s Natural Foods turkey gravy is sold in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba.

    The Canadian Food Inspection Agency says the product contains mustard, which is not included on its label.

    The agency says the recall was triggered by the company and there have been no reported reactions associated with the product.

    It says the turkey gravy should not be consumed by anyone who is allergic or sensitive to mustard and is advising customers not to distribute or sell it.

    The agency is investigating and says it is verifying that the product is being removed from the marketplace.

    Health Canada recognizes mustard as a common food allergen.

  • Rubio pledges US cooperation in Marine-linked murder case

    Rubio pledges US cooperation in Marine-linked murder case

    A US Marine stationed on Okinawa has been arrested on suspicion of killing a 39-year-old woman.

    The United States ‌Secretary of State Marco Rubio has vowed ⁠to cooperate ⁠with Japanese authorities investigating allegations that a US Marine murdered a woman in Okinawa, a case that provoked ⁠protests and prompted a US military curfew and mandatory training in standards and discipline.

    The top US diplomat spoke ⁠with Japanese Foreign Minister Motegi Toshimitsu in a phone call, the US Department of State said in a statement on Saturday following the death of a local woman in a hotel that has ‌renewed tensions over the US military presence.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    “Rubio expressed sincere condolences over the death of a Japanese national in Okinawa, as well as the United States’ determination to communicate and fully cooperate with the Government of Japan and local authorities as they conduct an investigation,” the ⁠department said.

    Devin Jacob Ballard, stationed at ⁠Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, was arrested on October 4 on suspicion of robbing and murdering Anna Yagi, 39, in a hotel in the ⁠capital Naha, according to local police.

    Local media reported that she was choked to death and her wallet stolen.

    Ballard has denied the allegations.

    The killing triggered outrage in Japan, where crimes involving US forces have been a thorn in relations between the close security allies and have long inflamed criticism of US troops being stationed there. Japan hosts the largest overseas contingent of US forces globally, ‌with most of the 18,000 Japan-based Marines stationed on Okinawa.

    Following the killing, US military personnel stationed ⁠there have been given ⁠a monthlong curfew and banned from drinking alcohol while they undergo discipline training.

    Rubio and Toshimitsu also discussed US sanctions on the International Criminal ‌Court ‌and the upcoming G20 Foreign Ministers meeting in Atlanta, scheduled to begin on October 30.

  • US opens antitrust probe into TV networks for halting Trump coverage

    US opens antitrust probe into TV networks for halting Trump coverage

    Department of Justice says it’s investigating whether the White House press pool’s decision violated antitrust laws.

    The United States Department of Justice has opened an investigation into television networks’ decision to halt coverage of President Donald Trump last month.

    A spokesperson said on Saturday that the department was investigating whether the networks violated federal antitrust laws by their boycott, which followed a White House decision to pull the credentials of reporters from three news organisations, including CNN.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 4 itemsend of list

    The ⁠networks under investigation are ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News, said Emily Convington, the Justice Department spokesperson.

    “Group boycotts among commercial competitors can violate the Sherman Act,” she said of the antitrust legislation.

    “The Antitrust Division is simply investigating to determine whether these news organizations have violated the antitrust laws.”

    The investigation is the latest in a series ‌of clashes between the Trump administration and major news organisations. Trump has repeatedly called the mainstream media “fake news” and frequently clashes with reporters during encounters with the press.

    The action also puts legal and potentially financial pressure on the media to continue coverage of the president even when they disagree with how the White House handles them.

    The networks did not immediately comment on the announcement.

    The Justice Department’s move came after the television pool of five broadcasters last month ceased presidential coverage after the administration barred CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House.

    The White House said on September 19 that covering the president was a “privilege – not a right”. The outlets ⁠sued the administration, alleging the exclusions violated the First Amendment and that the White House was retaliating over their coverage.

    CNN is one of the five ⁠news organisations – along with ABC, CBS, Fox News and NBC – ⁠that make up the primary White House television pool.

    They share the costs of covering the president, take turns organising coverage, and share the footage with outlets around the country.

    All of the five television networks that cover the White House, including Fox ‌News, suspended coverage in solidarity and refused to provide replacement coverage.

    The White House reinstated the credentials on September 24 after US District Judge Timothy Kelly ruled that the ban was likely unconstitutional and ‌ordered ‌the administration to “immediately return, reinstate, and restore” their access.

    However, disputes over access to specific presidential events and pool assignments continued.

    Jose Zamora, the Committee to Protect Journalists’ Americas director, on Saturday criticised the administration’s decision to investigate.

    “The government should not use antitrust investigations to intimidate news outlets defending press access,” Zamora said on X. “The public’s right to know depends on that access.”

  • Musk vows ‘affordable’ Starlink in India as he escalates feud with Ambani

    Musk vows ‘affordable’ Starlink in India as he escalates feud with Ambani

    Elon Musk’s latest comments come days before Mukesh Ambani’s low-cost Reliance Jio’s parent launches India’s largest-ever initial public offering.

    ‌Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has said he would price his Starlink satellite internet service affordably ⁠in India to take ⁠on Mukesh Ambani’s low-cost Reliance Jio, escalating his attacks on the rival tycoon days before Jio’s parent launches the country’s largest-ever initial public offering (IPO).

    Jio Platforms, ⁠which owns the telecom arm, is targeting a valuation of $106bn in the offering. Much like SpaceX-owned Starlink, Jio’s satellite venture is also awaiting final ⁠security clearance to launch.

    Cheap data is the playbook that built Jio in India, and the one Musk has used in markets like Kenya to unsettle local telecom players. SpaceX now plans to enter the mobile carrier market itself, starting in ‌the United States.

    Musk did not specify prices for India, where mobile data costs about rupees 7.74 ($0.08) per gigabyte, among the lowest in the world.

    “Obviously, if Starlink is too expensive in India, no one will buy it, so SpaceX will need to make pricing affordable,” he said in a post on his social media platform X on Saturday.

    “The reality is that ⁠competition would greatly benefit the average citizen in India by ⁠giving them more choices, as it always does. Ambani’s profits will be lower, but he is not going out of business,” Musk added.

    ‘Prime Minister Ambani’

    Musk’s remarks were the latest in ⁠a series of X posts in which he accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government and Ambani of stalling Starlink’s entry ⁠into one of the world’s biggest internet markets to ⁠favour market leader Jio.

    The posts have marked a sharp turn for Musk, who has long enjoyed a warm public rapport with Modi.

    India’s government has denied any bias in its approval process, ‌noting that the three satellite ventures seeking to launch, including Starlink’s and Jio’s, are all awaiting final security clearance.

    Late on Friday, Musk taunted Ambani directly, addressing ‌him as “Prime ‌Minister Ambani” and asking whether he would “consider allowing Starlink to compete”.

    Reliance has not responded to Musk’s remarks.