Category: Entertainment

  • ‘Love Story’ Creator Connor Hines Explains His (and Your and My) Kennedy Obsession

    Throughout his years of development, Connor Hines was concerned that nobody was even going to notice his passion project. Then, last summer, test shots of stars Paul Anthony Kelly as John F. Kennedy Jr. and Sarah Pidgeon as Carolyn Bessette became an Instagram lightning rod, and he realized that attention wasn’t going to be an issue. 

    Over its first six episodes, FX’s Love Story has captivated and divided viewers — with debates about historical accuracy, the treatment certain still-living figures have received and, still, the clothing. As a first-time showrunner who’d been fascinated by Bessette and Kennedy long before Ryan Murphy announced plans for their TV treatment, he seems to still be processing his show’s outsized role at the watercooler. “I put it on my bucket list and assumed that I would not be able to write it until much later in my career,” says Hines. “When it was announced that Ryan was doing this new anthology, I pursued the job as I’ve never pursued anything in my life.”

    Speaking during a recent episode of The Hollywood Reporter podcast I’m Having an Episode (SpotifyAmazon MusicApple), recorded before Daryl Hannah took her issues with her own depiction public, Hines spoke about the long process of piecing together two incredibly private lives and why we’re all still so fascinating by America’s most famous family.

    ***

    So how did this become a fascination of yours? 

    I was obsessed with The Crown and the fact that we don’t have anyone equivalent in the U.S, really, except for the Kennedys — in terms of a dynasty that’s known the world over. I went down a rabbit hole, starting with Joe Kennedy, working my way through the generations. For a while I thought I was going to write something dating back to the beginning of the family. There’s no shortage of stories and trials and tribulations. But reaching John and Carolyn’s generation, specifically their story, I remember texting my manager at the time. I couldn’t believe nobody had done a limited series about the two of them. I put it on my bucket list, assumed that I would not be able to write it until much later in my career. When it was announced that Ryan Murphy was doing this new anthology, I pursued the job. I’ve never pursued anything in my life.

    I’d imagine that people haven’t done it before because there’s a certain amount of fear in tackling such a sensitive subject…

    Yeah, but I was so struck by the disconnect between the narrative that surrounded their marriage at the time —  especially Carolyn — and the woman that her friends described as being this incredibly fun, loving, vivacious woman. Of course, you see a myriad photos of her and she looks quite withdrawn or frightened or shut down. I just thought, “Oh, I want to know who the woman was that nobody got to see, who the woman was before she met JFK Jr.” She had a very storied career at Calvin Klein, starting with folding sweaters at the mall in Boston to being one of his most trusted advisors in the C-suite.

    What was your awareness of them growing up?

    I grew up right outside of New York City. My dad commuted in every day, so he’d always bring home a copy of the New York Post. I have all of these memories of seeing their photos everywhere. I specifically remember, in Page Six, they always bold the celebrity names. It was constantly their names and images. And I come from two very large Irish Catholic families outside of Boston, so I was already familiar with the Kennedys. My grandmother basically had a shrine to the President and Jackie… 

    Paul Anthony Kelly as John F. Kennedy Jr., Naomi Watts as Jackie Kennedy Onassis in Love Story.

    Eric Liebowitz/FX

    Oh, the Kennedy obsession is very real in Irish American families. 

    One-hundred percent. He was our first Catholic president, which meant a lot to that community. It meant a lot to my grandparents. [Jackie] was just a rockstar in her own. I don’t think people really give her enough credit for the role she played in the Camelot of it all. She specifically crafted that narrative as, I think, a service to her husband. She was so much more savvy than I think people realized. People think of Jackie Kennedy and they think grace, poise and style. But, and I say this in a positive way, she was a very calculated, savvy person. A political operative.

    A lot has been said about your decision not to interview anyone in the family, which operates under this rather hilarious assumption that any of them would talk to you. 

    Correct. In what world would they want to be like, “Yeah, let’s sit down and kiki!” Obviously, the family has been apprehensive about the show — which I understand. But it’s not like I was screening their calls. I think it was understood from the very beginning that there would not be a collaboration between us. That’s best for everybody involved. You have to be as objective as possible when you tell a story. I know myself well enough that if I started developing personal relationships with members of the family, it would’ve absolutely clouded the way that I wrote the show. 

    This family still looms large in the American psyche, not just because one member is currently involved in decisions that a lot of us don’t agree with. There is a nod to RFK Jr. in one episode, it’s very subtle. But was there any temptation to have more fun with that?

    We are already dealing with a sensitive subject matter as it is. I didn’t have much interest in inviting any more controversy or discussion. I thought that was something we should just steer clear of. Plus, I didn’t really to distract from what the show was about. Anything surrounding him would create headlines that I certainly didn’t want. We’re trying to celebrate different members of the family. 

    The majority of this show is scenes between two of them, John and Carolyn, in private. Talk to me about the process behind the artistic liberties that you take. These are scenarios in which we don’t know what was said, so what guardrails did you establish?

    Basically, you do as much research as humanly possible. You nail down a timeline for each episode, and each episode has a milestone — whether it be a wedding or the engagement. You gather as much information about those periods of times, what their friends and family were saying about the state of their marriage. So much of the volatility was captured by the media, but the loving moments between them, the respect and admiration, they had for each other was not making news. Our job was to recreate that. You just had to have an understanding based off of everything you read about where they were in their journey emotionally, where Carolyn was in the journey with her fame and celebrity, where John was with his career, with George, with his family. Take all the variables that were surrounding them, you gain a sense of how they would be feeling about themselves and therefore towards each other. And then, with that, you take a creative liberty and extrapolate as best you can. 

    Sarah Pidgeon as Carolyn Bessette Kennedy in Love Story.

    Kurt Iswarienko/FX

    But there was this huge kerfuffle, mostly sartorially, when that test shot came out last summer.

    I don’t know what you’re talking about. (Laughs.) I haven’t heard about this. This is the first I’m hearing about the test shots.

    So, what happened?

    It was very preliminary. We were still playing around with the aesthetics for these characters. It wasn’t really anything more than that. Once they were released, I don’t think we anticipated everybody feeling as strongly as they did about the looks. More specifically, I think we just got a sense of how protective and, to some extent, obsessed people still were with the two of them. I’ve been living with this show for four years. I did not think anybody was going to care about it until it came out —  and that’s the best case scenario. To have the internet create this massive dialogue surrounding their aesthetics before we even started shooting and have paparazzi show up week one, I was just sort of like, “Oh god, I can’t believe how much people still care about these two.” If anything, it gave me a hope that there was an audience that would be waiting for us when the show came out. 

    I was shocked at how large that, specifically, the Carolyn Bessette Kennedy fandom is. There are Instagram accounts devoted to her with like half a million followers. Were you aware of that when you decided on her as your point of entry? 

    I was aware there remains this evergreen presence in the fashion world. She’s a very unique. There are not many people that became as famous as she did that had no interest in fame. We’re so accustomed to people capitalizing on fame, monetizing fame. She was the antithesis of that. She wasn’t going to let you in. She did not give interviews. She did not pose on the cover of any magazines. She did not capitalize on it. If anything, she married him in spite of it. It only adds to the mystique of this woman that, on top of being classically stylish, we never really knew her.

    And, despite all that, she remains this hugely famous figure. 

    But one of the more intriguing parts of telling this story is that she’s so memorialized as this one-dimensional fashion icon. There was just a giant life behind this person and an incredible career and friendships and relationships and a city that she loved and made her own. She was so much more. I appreciate the fact that her legacy has lived on, but she should be remembered for a lot more.

    This is a rare Ryan Murphy production in which he does not have a writing or directing credit. Knowing that, and knowing that this was something that he was very interested in, what did he tell you about how he envisioned this project?

    He was very influential from the beginning. He just really responded to it, and our visions for the show really aligned. When I gave him the first couple scripts, he was very supportive and encouraging. I think he has a dedication to his audience and that our ability to entertain them is a privilege that shouldn’t be wasted. He just has his finger on the pulse in that he’s well aware that when people are watching a show, they could be turning the channel at any moment or picking up their phone. We have a responsibility to keep people engaged. And when it came to the style and the aesthetic of the show, that’s just Ryan. He’s an incredibly visual person. I was very much fixated on the emotional beats of the show. But when we would meet and talk, he sees everything so vividly in a way that I don’t. In that way, we complemented each other. Ss soon as I would give him pages, he knew exactly how he wanted it all to look. 

    This is a high-profile project that, in many ways, is introducing you as a writer. And it is a huge moment for your two leads, who were in no way household names going into this. How were they prepped for all of the attention that was going to be on them? On my drive in today, I passed five billboards, that I counted, bearing their images. 

    That’s certainly not me preparing them. (Laughs.) I have no idea what this must feel like [for them]. That’s more Ryan’s wheelhouse: preparing people for stardom. But I can’t tell you how many days I sat on set, watching the two of them and thinking, “Oh, they have no idea how much their life is going to change.” People are going to want to watch the two of them for a very long time. I’ve never had that experience — working with someone that you’re friends and then thinking, “Oh, these people are going to be superstars.” But they’re taking it all in stride. All they wanted was for people to feel that they did justice to John and Carolyn, because they knew it was a very high bar. And I think people are responding positively. 

    Paul was cast like at the 11th hour, right? 

    I was literally asking Uber drivers and people on the street if they wanted to read for John. In my mind, if we didn’t find this person, then this show that I’d spent three years working would not come to fruition. We weren’t just looking for somebody that looks like John, which is hard enough as it is. You have to find somebody who looks like they vacation on Cape Cod, launched a magazine, can command a room and hold court with dignitaries. And their mother is Jackie Kennedy. There were so many variables that an actor had to possess in addition to looking like him. But when he came into the room and people saw him in person, it was like, “Oh, this is what we had in mind.”

    You were originally an actor before you started writing. What do you consider yourself at the moment?  

    I grew up doing theater. I studied at a conservatory in New York after college. Performing on stage was always my first love. But, as you know, you very quickly realize how hard it is showing up to auditions for student films — that you weren’t being paid for — with tyrannical 18-year-old directors from Columbia and NYU. I was thinking to myself, “Oh, I don’t know if this is going to be for me.” Even the things I was booking I didn’t want anyone to see. When I started writing, it flipped a switch. It’s like I get to play every character in the script in my head.

    Do you know what’s next for you? 

    I do, but I’m scared to say it out loud in case it doesn’t come into fruition. But it’s a different genre. I don’t know if I could write another love story right now, because I was so in love with the two of them and this project. I feel like I’m reeling from a breakup.

    ***

    Love Story releases new episodes Thursdays at 6 p.m. PT/9 p.m. ET on FX/Hulu, streaming on Hulu.

  • Is Hollywood Dying?

    Is Hollywood Dying?

    For well over 100 years, Hollywood’s entertainment industry was the center of the cultural universe – both geographically and as probably one of the greatest brands in history. It had everything: glamour, intrigue, stars and talented people creating some of the most wonderful stories by way of the very best films and television shows ever produced.

    People have historically come from all over the world to visit the big studios, to see where the stars lived and died, to be a part of the magic. At the risk of sounding too nostalgic, it was unlike anything else.

    I admit I too was enamored and wanted to be a part of it all. After time on Wall Street, I moved to Los Angeles and established The Lippin Group in 1986 with the vision of creating a strategic, business-focused agency that specialized in entertainment and media. Over the last 40 years, we have worked with clients around the world, developed and implemented corporate and publicity campaigns across all platforms as they evolved.

    But the Hollywood I experienced when I first arrived on the West Coast no longer exists. From the streaming wars and the rise of YouTube to a global pandemic, labor unrest and disruption generated by AI and M&A — not to mention the political climate and even destructive wildfires — the industry’s view of this “Roaring ’20s” is far different from the last one a century ago. But I believe we are still a long way off from pulling the plug. My optimism stems from this being an inspiring business and an essential part of our culture, something definitely worth saving.

    Today, technology is largely seen as the culprit in this whodunit despite it having brought our industry unparalleled progress, including democratized influence, broadband audio and video access and never-before-available revenue opportunities. The issue is that while AI is increasing efficiency at unprecedented levels, it is also forcing us to change the fundamental foundations of the industry: human capital and creativity.

    Or at least we think so. Is it possible to have the best of both worlds?

    If we approach this with a different mindset anything is possible. One only needs to recall how following AOL’s disastrous acquisition of Warner Bros. a quarter century ago the entertainment industry concluded Hollywood and Silicon Valley were bad fits and the industry just wrote it off to a terrible decision.

    Cut to today, with Paramount (with help from the visionary founder of tech giant Oracle, which recently acquired a stake in TikTok), soon to acquire the iconic Warner Bros. studio and its symbol of prestige TV, HBO. The consolidation has elicited Armageddon-like emotions in the creative community. This follows on the heels of Amazon’s acquisition of MGM and its prestigious library and IP, as well as Disney’s deal for 20th Century Fox assets.

    While this technological takeover was happening, the industry was too busy to consider what it all meant because it was obsessively focused on meeting Wall Street’s quarterly earnings reports, including its demands for mass layoffs and production cuts to finance massive leveraged mergers. No long-term strategy needed.

    Now that our industry is at a crossroads, let’s remember what kept our business on a straight and narrow course over the last 60 to 70 years — predictability resulting from a variety of secondary tiers after TV shows and movies had their network and theatricals runs. The 10 percent of deficit-financed network shows lucky enough to make it past four seasons would enter syndication or the international market with a hundred episodes, with the top sitcoms and episodic dramas poised to make billions of dollars for their creators. Successful theatrical films would go onto earn respectable pay TV and home entertainment dollars, meanwhile. 

    Streaming changed all of that. With a business model centered around generating tens and hundreds of millions of subscribers rather than ratings, Netflix bought up all the windowing rights so it would have the content in perpetuity.

    Having said that, let’s recognize some opportunities:

    Hollywood risk takers must come back and accept less money upfront in exchange for backend rights. In essence, content producers, by foregoing large upfront compensation, could reap the rewards of long-term content ownership over an increasing number of distribution platforms as, for many years, the producers of network television series have done. They have produced their shows at a deficit, later realizing the greatest financial rewards when those shows were distributed in syndication. Taking risks like this would serve as a significant incentive to many producers and increase the supply of great content. And that would help keep Hollywood employed and subscribers pouring into streaming services.

    We have to also find ways to bring predictability back to our industry, while also being flexible so we can let the unpredictability work for us. For example, a serious analysis of content windowing is needed, not to force things to be what they once were, but to best balance consumer expectations with maximum revenues, while not throwing away what works to spite ourselves. Looking at this from a marketing point of view, we need to take a step back and see what works to maximize attention for content that costs billions to make, yet can be promoted so much better. Outside of the industry, I regularly find myself in conversations about the best shows and movies I’m watching, and more time is spent answering questions (What network is it on? How can I watch it? Is it released weekly or all at once?) than talking about the amazing work itself.

    I’m not here to criticize the different business models that dictate the disparate strategies of each media company, but rather am espousing the need to find  a way to swing the pendulum back to some form of  predictability. That would not only make marketing messages easier to convey but allow companies investing so much in this content to maximize their ROI. The result would be increased revenue rather than mass layoffs of the very marketing and publicity teams who are charged with shining a spotlight on it.

    And let’s not forget about all of the focus recently on theatrical windows. We are risking losing sight of the marketing benefits of having films in theaters, and the symbiotic relationship theatrical can have with streaming. People who see a giant billboard for a new movie but wait for it to become available on streaming are still seeing the giant billboard for a new movie.

    Let’s figure out how to lean into technology and make it work for us, while also embracing regulation of AI, collaboratively and across borders. We can’t ignore the tools in front of us that can allow us to spend more time strategically and analytically thinking about what’s next to make our business(es) thrive. But we must fight to protect name, image and likeness rights of individuals to ensure that guardrails are up that preserve the truth and punish malicious creation of deepfakes or revenge porn.

    Finally, we must look at the industry more globally than we already are. The world is flatter than ever, and international production is posing a risk to traditional Hollywood via tax incentives, etc., but also brings opportunities in terms of shared storytelling, breaking down cultural boundaries, and eliciting empathy.

    Yes, it’s a challenge that productions are moving to other markets. But it’s also an opportunity for us to find amazing stories that we could bring to our audiences wherever they are. The reality is that “international” productions, even if subtitled or dubbed, are so much more accessible than they once were, universal storylines that translate across borders are being embraced, and people, especially younger generations, see all of the above as a net positive, not a burden.

    To be successful today, we must take a cue from these consumers, and identify creativity wherever it resides – doing even more business with companies around the world.  By the way, we can embrace this reality while also looking to, of course, preserve jobs and opportunities domestically. It isn’t a zero sum game.

    The disruption of the entertainment world has been massive, but this isn’t new — Hollywood has faced disruption and claims of imminent extinction before. Can we recover from what has occurred? It is possible but only if the tech world and the traditional studio leaders who still hold high ranking positions in the industry get together and work out ways that are mutually beneficial – and do so with the entire international marketplace in mind. Then, and only then, will we see perhaps the greatest brand revival ever.

    Dick Lippin is founder, chairman and CEO of The Lippin Group, a premier communications agency that specializes in representing companies, creators and content.

  • ‘Bridesmaids’ Reunion Set for Oscars With Kristen Wiig, Maya Rudolph, Melissa McCarthy and Rose Byrne (EXCLUSIVE)

    ‘Bridesmaids’ Reunion Set for Oscars With Kristen Wiig, Maya Rudolph, Melissa McCarthy and Rose Byrne (EXCLUSIVE)

    Rose Byrne is not only going into Oscar night as a first-time nominee for her work in “If I Had Legs I’d Kick You,” but she’ll also be reuniting with her “Bridesmaids” co-stars.

    Sources tell me that a “Bridesmaids” reunion is in the works during the ceremony with Byrne, Kristen Wiig, Maya Rudolph and Melissa McCarthy. Final details are currently being discussed.

    The occasion will mark the 15-year anniversary of the hit comedy’s release. Directed by Paul Feig, “Bridesmaids” was written by Wiig and Annie Mumolo.

    McCarthy earned the first of her two Oscar nominations for supporting actress. Wiig and Mumolo nabbed noms for original screenplay.

    As Variety previously reported, Barbra Streisand is in talks to perform at the Oscars in tribute to her “The Way We Were” co-star Robert Redford.

    Streisand is “in conversations” to sing during the In Memoriam segment of the ceremony, according to sources. It has not been decided if the In Memoriam segment would be a solo performance by Streisand or if she’d be joined by other artists.

    Billy Crystal is set to lead a tribute to Rob Reiner with other stars of the late filmmaker’s movies, including Meg Ryan, appearing on stage at the same time.

    Presenters set for the 98th Academy Awards include Paul Mescal, Chris Evans, Robert Downey Jr., Will Arnett, Priyanka Chopra Jonas, Gwyneth Paltrow, Adrien Brody, Javier Bardem, Kieran Culkin, Chase Infiniti, Mikey Madison, Demi Moore, Kumail Nanjiani, Zoe Saldaña and Rudolph.

    Hosted by Conan O’Brien, the Oscars will take place on March 15 at the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood and be televised live by ABC and streamed on Hulu.

  • ‘Frankenstein’ Lead Oscar Isaac, ‘La Llorona’ Director Jayro Bustamante Push for Guatemala Film Law

    ‘Frankenstein’ Lead Oscar Isaac, ‘La Llorona’ Director Jayro Bustamante Push for Guatemala Film Law

    Guatemala is close to enacting its first film law. On March 10, its Congress will be entering into final discussions on Initiative 5906. If it passes, Guatemala will no longer be one of the few nations in Latin America without a legal framework for its audiovisual industry.

    Leading the call for international support of this bill is FIPCA, the Ibero-American Federation of Cinematographic and Audiovisual Production, which has already gathered more than 3,500 signatures, including those of Guatemala’s leading voices: Óscar Isaac (“Frankenstein”) and Jayro Bustamante (“La Llorona,” “Ixcanul”) among others in the Ibero-American audiovisual industry.

    “If we want to stop losing our talent and our stories, this law is essential. Until now, those of us who have stood out in the arts have been the exception rather than the rule. What truly matters is normalizing the idea that the country should actively support its cultural industries. Those of us who have found a voice in cinema today have done so largely thanks to the backing of film industries abroad,” Bustamante told Variety.

    Said FIPCA president Ignacio Rey: “The Ibero-American audiovisual community is closely following this debate. In Latin America, film laws have proven to be effective tools for economic development and job creation. Guatemala is one of the few countries in the region that still lacks a specific legal framework and its approval would allow the country to fully integrate into international co-production networks.”

    “For nearly 20 years, we have been fighting for a national film law. At the same time, we have continued making films — pushing against the tide, attending festivals, winning awards and placing our country on the global stage. It’s clear that with proper incentives and safeguards, we could build a strong, sustainable industry that truly contributes to the nation. We know there is still much work ahead, but we are motivated and inspired by these challenges,” said Joaquín Ruano, president of the Guatemalan Association of Audiovisual and Cinematography and FIPCA representative.

    The initiative contemplates the creation of a Guatemalan Film Institute, a Film Promotion Fund, a Film Commission operating as a one-stop shop for international productions, a National Cinematheque and a National Higher School of Cinema, among others.

    For Bustamante, whose films have represented his country three times in the Oscars’ Best International Feature category (“Ixcanul,”“La Llorona” and “Rita”), the lack of a film law has been a source of frustration for him and his peers. “The prevailing local mindset remains narrow. There are still claims that adding a one-dollar levy to each plane ticket—paid by foreign visitors—would somehow devastate international tourism. Some even argue that public support shouldn’t go to cinema at all, but to AI instead, so young people can make films that way. It is deeply disheartening to face such rigid, hyper-capitalist, free-market thinking.”

    Data provided by FIPCA argues that “regional experience offers clear and measurable evidence. In Mexico City, the film industry contributes around 12% of local GDP; in the Dominican Republic, following the implementation of its film law, the sector increased national GDP by 0.32%; in Panama, the audiovisual sector forms part of the creative industries that represent close to 6% of GDP and in Costa Rica, these industries account for approximately 3% of GDP.”

    Said Gabriela Sandoval, FIPCA vice president: “The regional figures are clear: where structured audiovisual policies exist — funds, film commissions, incentives — the economic impact is measurable, as a value chain is activated that goes beyond the cultural sphere. Guatemala already has talent and an international track record; what is now under discussion is whether the country chooses to turn that talent into a sustainable development policy.”

    FIPCA led the drive to freeze the proposed changes to Argentina’s legislation which would have scrapped the traditional funding mechanism for its film-TV body INCAA. The petition it sent out, signed by nearly 1,000 Ibero-American film industry leaders, helped persuade Argentina’s congress to shelve the proposal and allow for two more years of public debate and advocacy.

  • Olivia Rodrigo, Cameron Winter, Wet Leg and More Unveil New Songs on War Child’s Stellar ‘Help(2)’ Benefit Compilation: Album Review

    Olivia Rodrigo, Cameron Winter, Wet Leg and More Unveil New Songs on War Child’s Stellar ‘Help(2)’ Benefit Compilation: Album Review

    The first “War Child,” a British-all-star charity album featuring rare tracks from such then-rising-ish stars as Oasis, Radiohead, Blur, Portishead and Massive Attack as well as Sinead O’Connor, Suede and the Stone Roses, arrived in September of 1995 — so long ago that the primary motivation at the time was to support the War Child charity’s efforts in Bosnia. The organization aims to deliver aid, education, mental health support and protection to children affected by conflict around the world; musically speaking, we can remember getting a specially burned advance CD of that album and being very excited about the new songs from Radiohead (“Lucky,” which of course would be a highlight of the “OK Computer” album almost two years later) and Portishead (“Mourning Air,” ditto their self-titled sophomore set).

    Much more importantly, the album — recorded in a single day — raised over £1.2 million for War Child.

    Some 31 years later, the sequel, “Help (2),” has arrived and was overseen by executive producer James Ford, known for his work with Arctic Monkeys, Depeche Mode, Pulp, Fontaines DC and many others. He put his address book to work here: There are new tracks — nearly all of which were recorded at Abbey Road Studios across one week last November — from all of the above artists (including the first new song from the Arctic Monkeys since 2022) as well as new songs from Olivia Rodrigo, Geese’s Cameron Winter, Arooj Aftab & Beck, Damon Albarn (with Johnny Marr on guitar), Wet Leg, Big Thief, Beabadoobee and many more — a whopping 23 songs in all, the full tracklist appears below. As the announcement notes, “The new album, like the original, speaks to the urgency of the humanitarian situation globally today.”

    Bringing a critical take to such a well-intended album is always awkward, but highlights include the Arctic Monkeys’ first new song since 2022, an uncharacteristically low-key “Obvious” from Wet Leg, an unlikely tag-team on the Broadway song “Lilac Wine” from Arooj Aftab and Beck, a sensitive take on Sinead O’Connor’s hard-hitting “Black Boys on Mopeds” from Fontaines D.C., a sweetly soulful “Naboo” from Sampha, Big Thief’s “Relive, Redie” — and probably most of all, Olivia Rodrigo’s gorgeous, hushed take on Magnetic Fields’ “Book of Love,” from their 1999 classic album “99 Love Songs,” which she sings in a tone that summons “Drivers License” flashbacks.

    There is also a visual component to the album, for which Academy Award-winning filmmaker Jonathan Glazer acted as creative director, working with Academy Films to assemble a team of creatives and overseeing the filming and art direction for the project. Glazer’s concept was “By Children, For Children”: Each child operated their own small camera and was invited into the studios to film the artists recording without any restrictions, according to the announcement. Glazer’s also team worked with fixers and filmmakers in Ukraine, Gaza, Yemen and Sudan to gather footage filmed by children on the ground in those conflict zones.

    Most importantly of all, as the announcement states, “When ‘Help’ was first released, around 10% of the world’s children were affected by conflict. Today, that figure has almost doubled to nearly 1 in 5, or 520 million children worldwide; more than at any time since the Second World War. With conflicts escalating and funding cuts hitting hard, War Child U.K.’s work has never been more urgent and the need for these artists to carry forward the original album’s spirit of collective action could not be more vital.”

    “Help(2)” Tracklist:

    Arctic Monkeys – “Opening Night”
    Damon Albarn, Grian Chatten & Kae Tempest – “Flags”
    Black Country, New Road – “Strangers”
    The Last Dinner Party – “Let’s do it again!”
    Beth Gibbons – “Sunday Morning”
    Arooj Aftab & Beck – “Lilac Wine”
    King Krule – “The 343 Loop”
    Depeche Mode – “Universal Soldier”
    Ezra Collective & Greentea Peng – “Helicopters”
    Arlo Parks – “Nothing I Could Hide”
    English Teacher & Graham Coxon – “Parasite”
    Beabadoobee – “Say Yes”
    Big Thief – “Relive, Redie”
    Fontaines D.C. – “Black Boys on Mopeds”
    Cameron Winter – “Warning”
    Young Fathers – “Don’t Fight the Young”
    Pulp – “Begging for Change”
    Sampha – “Naboo”
    Wet Leg – “Obvious”
    Foals – “When the War is Finally Done”
    Bat For Lashes – “Carried my girl”
    Anna Calvi, Ellie Rowsell, Nilüfer Yanya & Dove Ellis – “Sunday Light”
    Olivia Rodrigo – “The Book of Love”

  • Lucy Dickins Stepping Down From WME’s Contemporary Music Division

    Lucy Dickins Stepping Down From WME’s Contemporary Music Division

    Lucy Dickins, who has been head of WME’s contemporary music and touring division since 2022, is stepping down from her role, according to an internal memo from co‑chairman Christian Muirhead obtained by Variety.

    The memo does not cite a reason for her departure; reps for the company did not immediately respond to requests for further information, although sources tell Variety her contract was up; Hits suggests she may be going to rival agency CAA.

    “We wanted to share with everyone that our friend and colleague Lucy Dickins will be leaving WME.

    “Over the past seven years, Lucy helped us navigate one of the most disruptive periods in the live music business. As the head of our UK office, she re-energized our presence in London, built a strong team, and solidified WME’s leadership in the region. Then COVID hit and she dove right in, taking on her expanded role, relocating to Los Angeles, and providing critical support to our team during an unprecedented crisis.

    “On the other side of the pandemic, she led major signings, constructed innovative tour models, and brought exceptional heart and enthusiasm to our business. 

    “Kirk Sommer will continue to lead the Contemporary Music division moving forward, and we will keep you posted with further updates.  

    “Please join us in wishing Lucy the best in her next chapter.”

    Dickins joined WME in 2019 after more than two decades at International Booking Talent (ITB), the U.K.-based agency founded by her father, Barry Dickins and Rod MacSween. She comes from a long line of British music business titans: her grandfather Percy launched the long-running music weekly NME, her uncle Rob Dickins led Warner Music U.K. for 15 years, and her brother Jonathan Dickins has managed Adele, Glass Animals and Rick Rubin.

    When she was elevated to global head of contemporary music and touring in 2022, she became the first woman to take on such a role at a major agency. Over the years she has worked closely with Adele, Zach Bryan, Luke Combs, Chris Stapleton and many others.

  • ‘Melania’: First Lady’s Doc Sets March Debut on Prime Video After Quietly Wrapping Theatrical Run

    ‘Melania’: First Lady’s Doc Sets March Debut on Prime Video After Quietly Wrapping Theatrical Run

    The first lady’s much-discussed documentary Melania will debut March 9 on Amazon’s streaming service Prime Video after quietly winding down its run in theaters, where it has earned north of $16.4 million domestically.

    Melania is one of the most expensive docs in history. Amazon MGM Studios ponied up $40 million for rights to the project, and is counting on the film to serve up presidential-sized viewership numbers on Prime.

    The doc chronicles the 20 days before Trumps second inauguration as president, and is directed by Brett Ratner in his first film since he was accused of multiple incidents of sexual misconduct (he denies any wrongdoing).

    The doc started off its box office run with something of a bang over the Jan. 30-Feb. 1 weekend following a world premiere at the Trump-Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., attended by the president. Melania opened in third place with a better-than-expected $7 million from 1,778 theaters, the best showing in a decade for a nonfiction title, excluding concert pics and Disney nature titles. And it beat Jason Statham‘s new action pic, Shelter, which opened to $5.5 million.

    However, the momentum didn’t last, but the pic did deliver a victory for the overall business in attracting older females. Melania dropped off a steep 67 percent in its sophomore outing. By its fourth weekend, it was shedding theaters because of diminished demand, and was available in only 505 locations, followed by 100 cinemas over the Feb. 27-March 1 weekend, when it placed No. 34 with $56,000.

    Melania hoped to be a major player overses, where Film Nation was brought on to handle getting the doc cinto theaters but foreign grosses were never reported.

  • The Opera and Ballet Community Haven’t Taken Those Timothée Chalamet Comments Well: “We Should Be Trying to Uplift These Art Forms”

    The Opera and Ballet Community Haven’t Taken Those Timothée Chalamet Comments Well: “We Should Be Trying to Uplift These Art Forms”

    Awards season can be tough. You’re at the forefront of every red carpet, every show, doing every interview, and marketing yourself as best you can while promoting a film. All eyes are on you, and it unfortunately leaves you wide open to criticism — take a look at best actress Oscar frontrunner Jessie Buckley, who this week is catching flak on social media for admitting that she asked her now-husband to re-home his cats when they started dating.

    Despite his successful Marty Supreme marketing moves, Timothée Chalamet is also not exempt from the online furore. In a resurfaced clip from his live conversation with Interstellar co-star Matthew McConaughey for Variety, the duo discusses audiences’ eroded attention spans and whether there is an appetite for slower-paced films.

    Chalamet said there is among younger fans, citing Netflix’s Frankenstein, adding: “It does take you having to wave a flag of, ‘Hey, this is a serious movie,’ or something, and some people do want to be entertained and quickly. I’m really right in the middle, Matthew,” he continued, “I admire people, and I’ve done it myself, who go on a talk show and say, ‘Hey, we’ve got to keep movie theaters alive, we’ve gotta keep this genre alive,’ and another part of me feels like if people want to see it, like Barbie, like Oppenheimer, they’re going to go see it and go out of their way to be loud and proud about it.”

    The Academy Award nominee then says, “I don’t want to be working in ballet or opera where it’s like, ‘Hey! Keep this thing alive, even though no one cares about this anymore,’” he laughs. “All respect to the ballet and opera people out there… I just lost 14 cents in viewership. I’m taking shots for no reason.”

    This is the part that has done the rounds on social media and left opera houses and ballet dancers a little fired up. In a statement to The Hollywood Reporter on Friday, a spokesperson from the U.K.’s flagship opera house countered Chalamet’s claims.

    The Royal Ballet and Opera said: “Ballet and opera have never existed in isolation — they have continually informed, inspired, and elevated other art forms. Their influence can be felt across theatre, film, contemporary music, fashion, and beyond. For centuries, these disciplines have shaped the way artists create and audiences experience culture, and today millions of people around the world continue to enjoy and engage with them.”

    American opera singer Isabel Leonard also responded to the clip. She wrote in a comment about the Chalamet video: “Honestly, I’m shocked that someone so seemingly successful can be so ineloquent and narrow-minded in his views about art while considering himself as [an] artist as I would only imagine one would as an actor.”

    “To take cheap shots at fellow artists says more in this interview than anything else he could say. Shows a lot about his character,” she continued. “You don’t have to like all art but only a weak person/artist feels the need to diminish in fact the VERY arts that would inspire those who are interested in slowing down, to do exactly that.”

    Elsewhere, Canadian opera singer Deepa Johnny called it a “disappointing take” and said: “There is nothing more impressive than the magic of live theatre, ballet and opera. We should be trying to uplift these art forms, these artists and come together across disciplines to do that.”

    Irish opera singer Seán Tester posted on his Instagram to say that Chalamet’s choice of words “is the kind of reductive take you hear when popularity is mistaken for cultural value.”

    “They are not outdated art forms. They are living ones, constantly reinterpreted, constantly evolving… It’s always fascinating when artists with global platforms dismiss opera and ballet as irrelevant. Opera and ballet have survived wars, […] To call these art forms irrelevant says far less about the art itself than it does about how little time someone has spent truly experiencing it.”

    THR took a deep dive into Chalamet’s widely speculated Oscar hopes this week, exploring how his Marty Supreme campaign lost momentum in the lead-up to the 98th Academy Awards on Mar. 15.

  • Daryl Hannah Slams FX’s ‘Love Story’ for ‘Lies’ and ‘Misogyny,’ Says She’s Getting ‘Threatening Messages From Viewers’ Over Her Portrayal

    Daryl Hannah Slams FX’s ‘Love Story’ for ‘Lies’ and ‘Misogyny,’ Says She’s Getting ‘Threatening Messages From Viewers’ Over Her Portrayal

    Daryl Hannah is not in love with “Love Story.”

    In a New York Times op-ed titled “How Can ‘Love Story’ Get Away With This?,” the actor-director denounces Ryan Murphy’s popular FX series — about the romance between John F. Kennedy Jr. and Carolyn Bessette — for its “lies” and “misogyny.” Hannah, who dated JFK Jr. prior to Bessette, is a central character in the show played by Dree Hemingway. The makers of the show did not consult with Hannah, and, as she points out in the op-ed, one producer has referred to her character as an “adversary” in the story.

    “I have generally chosen not to respond to media coverage of me. I have long believed that engaging with distortion often amplifies it. But a recent tragedy-exploiting television series about John F. Kennedy Jr. and Carolyn Bessette features a character using my name and presents her as me. The choice to portray her as irritating, self-absorbed, whiny and inappropriate was no accident,” Hannah writes.

    She opens the essay with advice she once received from none other than Jacqueline Onassis — who is portrayed by Naomi Watts in the series. “She told me that while tabloids, magazines and newspapers often sold ridiculous lies, they were nothing more than bird cage liner by the next day,” Hannah writes. “At the time, I found great comfort and consolation in those words. But today they no longer hold true.”

    Now, Hannah argues, “lies live online forever,” and “a dramatized portrayal can become, for millions of viewers, the definitive version of a real person’s life.”

    Dree Hemingway as Daryl Hannah in FX’s “Love Story”

    FX

    In making Hannah a spiteful obstacle to the coupling of JFK Jr. and Bessette, “Love Story” has turned “a real, living person” into a “narrative device,” Hannah writes. “Popular culture has long elevated certain women by portraying others as rivals, obstacles or villains. Isn’t it textbook misogyny to tear down one woman in order to build up another?”

    She adds, “The character ‘Daryl Hannah’ portrayed in the series is not even a remotely accurate representation of my life, my conduct or my relationship with John. The actions and behaviors attributed to me are untrue. I have never used cocaine in my life or hosted cocaine-fueled parties. I have never pressured anyone into marriage. I have never desecrated any family heirloom or intruded upon anyone’s private memorial. I have never planted any story in the press. I never compared Jacqueline Onassis’ death to a dog’s. It’s appalling to me that I even have to defend myself against a television show. These are not creative embellishments of personality. They are assertions about conduct — and they are false.”

    Since “Love Story” premiered on Feb. 12 on FX and Hulu, Hannah says she has “received many hostile and even threatening messages from viewers who seem to believe the portrayal is factual.”

    “I know that as an actress I will be in the public eye. I’ve endured a number of outrageous lies, crappy stories and unflattering characterizations before,” Hannah writes. “I chose not to battle them but to focus on my work and respect my loved ones by keeping my private life private. But my silence should not be mistaken for agreement with lies. Apparently, my discretion makes me a target.”

    She adds that she has always “honored” the Kennedy family’s right to privacy, and people “claiming to have any intimate knowledge of our personal lives are self-serving sensationalists trading in gossip, innuendo and speculation.” Hannah concludes the op-ed with: “May love and truth prevail.”

    Hannah is not the only public figure connected to the Kennedys who has spoken out about the show. Jack Schlossberg, JFK Jr.’s nephew who is running for Congress, recently slammed the series as a “grotesque display of someone else’s life.”

    “Love Story” creator and showrunner Connor Hines previously told Variety that he did not consult the Kennedy family while making the series because “as a writer, it’s more healthy and effective to have some distance from the subject matter.”

    Hemingway told The Hollywood Reporter that she wrote Hannah a “love note” detailing “how much I appreciate her as a woman, as an actress, and what an honor of my life this has been.” She did not hear back.

  • Metallica Add 16 Dates to Las Vegas Sphere Residency

    Metallica Add 16 Dates to Las Vegas Sphere Residency

    Metallica have added 16 dates to their “Life Burns Faster” residency at the Sphere in Las Vegas, tripling the number of shows for the engagement, which begins this fall and now extends into 2027. The general on-sale for all dates for Metallica’s residency at Sphere in Las Vegas begins today (Friday, March 6) at 10 a.m. PT.

    As with the previously announced eight-show run, the new additions to “Life Burns Faster” will continue the “No Repeat Weekend” tradition that began with the 2023 kick-off of the band’s M72 World Tour, with no songs repeated on each Thursday and Saturday. See below for a full list of dates.

    According to the announcement, the residency “will see live staples and surprises spanning the Metallica catalog enhanced by the venue’s immersive technologies that will allow fans to experience the sound and fury of the band’s live performance in new experiential dimensions.” Sphere’s technology includes “the world’s highest resolution LED display” that wraps up, over and around the audience; Sphere Immersive Sound; and “multi-sensory” 4D technology.

    Metallica co-founder/drummer Lars Ulrich commented, “About 12 seconds into the opening night of Sphere with U2 back in ‘23, I thought ‘We have to do this, it’s completely uncharted territory!’ This residency gives us another chance to reinvent how we interact with our fans in a live setting. We are beyond excited to share this with the world in six months time, and way fuckin’ psyched to go next level!”

    Metallica Life Burns Faster at Sphere is produced by Live Nation and presented by inKind.

    METALLICA

    LIFE BURNS FASTER

    LIVE AT SPHERE

    October 1 & 3

    October 8 & 10

    October 15 & 17

    October 22 & 24

    October 29 & 31

    November 5 & 7

    January 28 & 30

    February 4 & 6

    February 18 & 20

    February 25 & 27

    March 4 & 6

    March 11 & 13