Category: Business

  • Two Largest DAT Companies Double Down on Crypto Buys

    Two Largest DAT Companies Double Down on Crypto Buys

    The largest digital asset treasury (DAT) companies for Bitcoin ($BTC) and Ethereum ($ETH) added more crypto than usual to their stockpiles last week.

    Michael Saylor’s Strategy announced on Monday, March 9, that its latest weekly Bitcoin purchase totaled 17,994 $BTC at an average price of about $70,946 per coin. Last week’s buy is nearly 6x larger than the previous week’s buy of 3,015 $BTC — which itself marked a notable uptick in accumulation after weekly buys shrank since late January.

    The latest purchase bring’s Strategy’s stockpile to 738,731 $BTC as of March 8, or about $50.65 billion at current prices. The publicly traded firm remains the largest Bitcoin DAT by holdings, followed by MARA Holdings with 53,822 $BTC.

    Meanwhile, the second largest DAT company and the largest Ethereum DAT, Tom Lee’s Bitmine Immersion Technologies, announced in a press release today its most recent purchase of 60,976 $ETH, bringing its total Ethereum holdings to 4,534,563 $ETH as of March 8.

    Per the release, last week’s purchase is well above the firm’s recent weekly purchase average of 45,000-50,000 $ETH. The previous week, Bitmine bought 51,000 $ETH. Bitmine is currently staking 3,040,483 $ETH, or about 67% of the 4.5 million $ETH that it holds in its treasury.

    Also today, the second-largest Ethereum DAT, Sharplink, released its 2025 financial report. Per a press release from the firm, it recorded a $734.6 million net losses last year, a solid chunk of which — $616.2 million — were unrealized losses on its $ETH holdings.

    Sharplink announced its rebrand to an Ethereum DAT in May of last year — with Consensys CEO and Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin as chairman of its board. The firm has accumulated 864,840 $ETH to date, at an average cost of $3,588 per $ETH, per CoinGecko data.

    But, the spot price of $ETH had a volatile year in 2025. $ETH reached a new all-time high near $5,000 in August, only to end the year struggling near $3,000. $ETH is currently trading just over $2,000 at publishing time.

    $ETH price, May-December 2025.

  • Ethereum Foundation Decides to Stake a Significant Amount of ETH Assets

    Ethereum Foundation Decides to Stake a Significant Amount of ETH Assets

    The Ethereum Foundation, one of the main organizations in the Ethereum ecosystem, has decided to stake a portion of its treasury.

    The foundation utilizes on-chain solutions developed by Bitwise Asset Management as its infrastructure for the staking process. According to the announcement, the Ethereum Foundation started the staking process by initially depositing 2,016 $ETH. The organization’s ultimate goal is to stake approximately 70,000 $ETH. At current prices, this amount is worth approximately $140 million.

    Cryptocurrency wallets known to be linked to the Ethereum Foundation currently hold $418 million worth of $ETH. Of this amount, $354 million is held directly in $ETH, while the remainder is held as wrapped $ETH on other networks.

    At the time of writing, Ethereum staking rewards provide an annual return of 2.77% in $ETH terms. This means that the foundation will generate $3.8 million in annual revenue from this staking method in a scenario where the $ETH price remains stable.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Here’s What Michael Saylor Thinks of Altcoins

    Here’s What Michael Saylor Thinks of Altcoins

    Table of Contents

    What Did Saylor Actually Say About Altcoins?How Does He Frame Bitcoin by Comparison?Is This Just Bitcoin Maximalism in a New Suit?One Nuance Worth NotingWhat Is the Takeaway?

    Michael Saylor thinks altcoins can deliver 100x returns. He just thinks the odds are stacked against you.

    In a February 26 interview on The Sujal Show, the Strategy founder gave one of his cleaner breakdowns of why he stays Bitcoin-only. The framing is sharper than usual and worth unpacking.

    What Did Saylor Actually Say About Altcoins?

    The interview host put the standard challenge to him directly: Bitcoin cannot go 100x or 20x from here, but altcoins can. So why not altcoins?

    Saylor did not dispute the premise. He acknowledged that some altcoins will deliver massive returns. His counterpoint was a probability argument.

    I think there are hundreds of thousands of small businesses that might become very, very big. And occasionally, a million-dollar business becomes a trillion-dollar business. But it’s one in a million.”

    He compared altcoin picking to betting on the success of startups. Most small companies never become large. Most large companies never become Apple or Google. The winners exist, but identifying them in advance is not a repeatable strategy.

    How Does He Frame Bitcoin by Comparison?

    Saylor benchmarks Bitcoin against the S&P 500 and gold, both of which he says have appreciated roughly 14% annually over the past five years. Bitcoin, by his count, has compounded at around 45% annually over the same period.

    His framing: if you want a safe index-type asset that outperforms both gold and equities without picking individual winners, Bitcoin is that instrument. You give up the moonshot. You also give up the failure rate that comes with chasing it.

    Is This Just Bitcoin Maximalism in a New Suit?

    To some extent, yes. Strategy holds 738,731 BTC and has not diversified into any other digital asset. Michael Saylor’s X account has not mentioned Ethereum, Solana, or any altcoin project in months.

    What has shifted is the volatility argument. Saylor noted that Bitcoin’s drawdown profile has been compressing over the past decade. It went from a 200 volatility asset to roughly 80 when he first bought in 2020. Now he puts it closer to 40. He expects that trend to continue as institutional capital, banks, and large corporations deepen their exposure.

    His projection: Bitcoin volatility will gradually converge toward something like the VIX over the next 20 years, but with performance staying meaningfully above S&P index returns.

    One Nuance Worth Noting

    A day before this interview, at the Strategy World 2026 conference, Saylor mentioned that Bitcoin-backed financial products, including yield-bearing instruments like Strategy’s preferred stock STRC, could be deployed on blockchains like Ethereum and Solana. Some headlines read this as a softening of his stance on altcoins.

    It was not. He was describing distribution rails for Bitcoin-collateralized products, not endorsing ETH or SOL as investment assets. His view on altcoins as speculative bets did not change.

    What Is the Takeaway?

    Saylor is not saying altcoins are worthless. He is saying that selecting the one or two that go 100x out of hundreds of thousands of candidates is not a strategy most investors can execute consistently. Most altcoins from previous cycles are down significantly or no longer exist. The few that delivered large returns were not obviously identifiable in advance.

    His answer has not changed: buy the monetary index, skip the startup lottery.


    Source:

    • The Sujal Show Full interview with Michael Saylor, February 26, 2026, covering altcoins, Bitcoin volatility, and the monetary index thesis
  • Hyperliquid price eyes $40 breakout as technical indicators turn bullish

    Hyperliquid price eyes $40 breakout as technical indicators turn bullish

    Hyperliquid price is pushing toward a key resistance zone as rising trading volume and strengthening technical signals point to growing bullish momentum in the market.

    Summary

    • Hyperliquid rose to around $32 in a possible recovery attempt towards $40..
    • Volume and open interest climbed, indicating new positions as traders anticipate further price movement.
    • Technical indicators show strengthening momentum, with resistance sitting between $33 and $36.

    Hyperliquid ($HYPE) edged higher on renewed buying, with the token trading around $32.63 at press time, up 6.6% in the past 24 hours. The price has stayed within a weekly range of $29.61 to $33.33, holding near the top of that band.

    Over the past year, Hyperliquid has been one of the stronger performers among the top 100 cryptocurrencies, gaining about 136%. Even so, it still trades roughly 45% below its September 2025 peak of $59.30.

    Trading activity has picked up as well. 24-hour spot volume reached about $289 million, a 98% increase compared with the previous day, which suggests fresh interest from traders.

    Derivatives markets show a similar pattern. Data from CoinGlass shows trading volume climbing 84% to $1.36 billion, while open interest rose 9.56% to $1.33 billion. This mix open often signals that new positions are being added rather than closed.

    Hyperliquid fundamentals grow stronger

    Beyond price action, the platform itself continues to expand. Hyperliquid now accounts for roughly 70% of decentralized perpetual futures trading volume, while daily activity on the exchange is estimated at 9.9% of the level seen on Binance.

    You might also like: Will Ethereum price fall under $1,900 as a bearish crossover forms?

    The network has also built a sizable user base. More than 665,000 traders are active on the platform, and monthly revenue is estimated at around $116 million. According to project data, about 38% of the token supply has been set aside for future ecosystem initiatives.

    New features are gradually being introduced. These include HIP-4 outcome trading and efforts to connect real-world assets to the platform.

    Supply mechanics may also play a role in the token’s dynamics. Hyperliquid runs an assistance fund that periodically buys back and burns $HYPE tokens. Roughly 4.17% of the supply, valued at about $1.36 billion, has already been removed through these operations, reducing the number of tokens in circulation.

    Hyperliquid price technical analysis

    From a technical perspective, several signals have started to lean positive. The price currently sits above the mid-Bollinger Band, which corresponds to the 20-day moving average. That area, around $29 to $30, has been acting as support in recent weeks as buyers step in during pullbacks.

    Hyperliquid price eyes $40 breakout as technical indicators turn bullish - 1

    Hyperliquid daily chart. Credit: crypto.news

    Volatility also appears to be returning. The Bollinger Bands are widening after a period of compression, a setup that traders often watch for stronger moves. At the moment, the price is pushing toward the upper band in the $33 to $36 range.

    Momentum indicators point in the same direction. The relative strength index is hovering in the upper-50 zone. Before the market enters overbought territory, that level usually denotes growing momentum while allowing room for growth.

    The chart also shows a pattern of higher lows since the rebound in late January, with buyers continuously protecting the $29 to $30 range. This kind of structure often depicts slow accumulation.

    For now, the main barrier sits between $33 and $36, where the token has struggled to move higher in recent attempts. A clear break above that zone could shift attention toward the $40 level, which many traders see as the next psychological target.

    If momentum fades, the first support lies near $29.9, while a deeper support zone sits around $26 to $27.

    Read more: Bitcoin price outlook weakens as oil jumps 60% on Strait of Hormuz risks

  • Treasury Urges Congress to Give Crypto Platforms Power to Freeze Suspicious Funds

    Treasury Urges Congress to Give Crypto Platforms Power to Freeze Suspicious Funds

    In brief

    • The Treasury has recommended a “hold law” allowing platforms to pause suspicious crypto transfers during investigations.
    • The proposal appears in a GENIUS Act report on tools to counter illicit finance involving digital assets.
    • The idea could help law enforcement react faster, though legal and transparency questions remain, Decrypt was told.

    The U.S. Treasury is urging Congress to consider creating a digital asset-specific “hold law” that would allow crypto platforms to temporarily freeze funds linked to suspected illegal activity.

    The recommendation has appeared in a Treasury report to Congress on technologies used to counter illicit finance involving digital assets, produced under the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins, or GENIUS Act.

    “Lawful users of digital assets may leverage mixers to enable financial privacy when transacting through public blockchains,” the report reads, adding that a measure for the hold law would create a legal safe harbor allowing financial institutions to “temporarily and voluntarily hold digital assets involved in suspected illegal activity” during an investigation.

    The authority could allow institutions to pause suspicious transfers before funds are moved or converted through other crypto services.

    “Exchanges often detect suspicious funds using blockchain intelligence, but there is not always a clear legal framework that allows them to hold those assets long enough for investigators to act,” Ari Redbord, global head of policy and government affairs at TRM Labs, told Decrypt.

    The move could help “create a defined window for platforms to pause those funds while law enforcement moves through the legal process,” Redbord added.

    If adopted, it could “strengthen how exchanges handle suspicious transactions,” Redbord explained, adding that in practice, it would give law enforcement “time to catch up to the speed of blockchain transactions,” and “strengthen public-private partnerships.”

    The recommendation comes as Congress debates broader legislation on the structure of the crypto market, with President Donald Trump pressing lawmakers to move faster on crypto rules amid a clash between banks and digital asset firms.

    While exchanges can report suspicious activity, holding the funds is legally harder, Andrew Rossow, public affairs attorney and CEO of AR Media Consulting, told Decrypt.

    “Banks already have the ability to delay a suspicious transaction, but that power is very narrow and legally awkward,” he said.

    Institutions can file a suspicious activity report, yet there is no “clean statutory safe harbor allowing the bank to hold the funds while the investigation unfolds” without a court order, sanctions authority, or risking liability.

    “For crypto exchanges, this problem is even more awkward because there is no ‘pending state’ or ‘freeze’ that is ‘clean,’” he added, noting that while the Bank Secrecy Act protects institutions that file suspicious activity reports in good faith, it does not clearly authorize them to freeze the funds tied to those reports.

    Exchanges that detect suspicious crypto flows would then need to choose between allowing the funds to move or freezing them, risking legal exposure.

    If a hold law gets adopted, crypto platforms will have clear authority to pause the assets while authorities review the case, Rossow explained.

    But the Treasury’s report has “left a number of vulnerabilities unresolved,” Rossow noted, pointing to questions around the reliability of blockchain analytics and the “tipping off” restrictions tied to current suspicious activity reporting rules.

    The proposal could create a paradox where transparency rules require disclosing a freeze, while suspicious activity reporting (SAR) rules prohibit explaining the underlying investigation, he warned.

    “If you freeze someone’s assets and then must be transparent about it, but cannot tell them you filed a SAR, you now have a structural paradox. The customer will know they’re frozen; but they won’t know why. This creates a legal gray zone that would need to be exploited.”

    Still, the recommendation could help create a “practical and important tool in the fight against crypto fraud and money laundering,” TRM Labs’ Redbord said.

    “Criminals move quickly, and digital assets move even faster,” he said. “A narrowly tailored hold authority helps close that gap.”

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Aave Users Reach Record as Traders Quietly Shift Capital Toward DeFi Lending

    Aave Users Reach Record as Traders Quietly Shift Capital Toward DeFi Lending

    In brief

    • Aave’s monthly active users hit an all-time high of ~155,000 in February, up roughly 100% in six months.
    • The surge was driven by rising ETH supply rates and the collapse of the basis trade, analysts say.
    • The Aave Chan Initiative, one of Aave’s most influential governance groups, announced its shutdown last week after a transparency dispute with Aave Labs.

    Monthly active users on DeFi lending protocol Aave reached roughly 155,000 in February, marking an all-time high and nearly doubling over the past six months.

    The rise in users comes as investors increasingly seek yield through decentralized lending protocols, according to on-chain analytics platform Token Terminal data.

    Sean Dawson, head of research at on-chain options platform Derive, told Decrypt that market dynamics appeared to be the primary driver behind the swelling of users.

    “The largest trade in crypto, the basis trade, has collapsed in recent months,” Dawson said. “Users used to be able to earn 10–30% or just by holding sUSDe, now this is less than 4%.” 

    Broader structural shifts in crypto trading strategies are also pushing capital toward lending platforms, he said.

    “Consequently, users have few places to park funds that are low risk—this makes lending the only remaining option,” he added.

    Peter Chung, head of research at Presto Labs, told Decrypt that Aave’s long-standing role in decentralized finance infrastructure likely explains the continued growth in its user base.

    “DeFi firms are largely experimental, but a select few have firmly established themselves as a critical onchain finance infrastructure,” Chung said. “Aave is one of them. They have gone through some governance changes recently, but not sure there is any causality there.”

    The rise in user activity comes amid governance tension within the Aave ecosystem.

    Last week, the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) said it would wind down, alleging that addresses tied to Aave Labs, including a 111,000 AAVE delegation from founder Stani Kulechov, helped swing the “Aave Will Win” temperature check, a $51 million funding proposal that passed with 52.58% support.

    ACI founder Marc Zeller said stripping those votes would have flipped the result, while the group’s own exit post cited “no role for an independent service provider” when the largest budget recipient can influence its own approval.

    The departure follows BGD Labs, the team behind Aave’s V3 codebase, which also stepped away over strategic disagreements with Aave Labs, leaving two major contributors gone in quick succession.

    Despite the governance turmoil, lending and borrowing activity on the protocol continues to operate normally.

    Aave currently holds nearly $27 billion in total value locked across 20 blockchains, making it the dominant DeFi lending protocol by a wide margin, according to DeFiLlama data.

    AAVE, the protocol’s governance token, is trading around $107, down about 0.7% over the past 24 hours and roughly 83.8% below its 2021 all-time high of $661, according to CoinGecko data.

    Looking ahead, Dawson said the protocol’s growth will depend on whether lending activity continues expanding.

    “Continued growth on TVL is the main metric I’d look at,” he said, adding that stability of rates without large deposits or withdrawals in the coming months will also be an important signal for the protocol’s trajectory.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Historical XRP Pattern Returns as One Bearish Metric Drops 80% — Trend Reversal Ahead?

    Historical XRP Pattern Returns as One Bearish Metric Drops 80% — Trend Reversal Ahead?

    $XRP price may be approaching a critical moment after weeks of downside pressure. The token has remained down roughly 8% over the past 30 days, showing that the broader structure is still bearish.

    However, a historical chart formation that previously triggered a rebound has appeared again. This time, the signal is accompanied by a sharp collapse in coin distribution and rising holder conviction, raising the possibility that $XRP could attempt a trend reversal if key levels break.


    Historical Divergence Returns as $XRP Prints the Same Bounce Setup

    The current setup begins with a bullish divergence on the Relative Strength Index (RSI). RSI is a momentum indicator that measures the speed and strength of price movements. When price falls, but RSI rises, it often signals that selling momentum is weakening.

    Between February 11 and March 8, $XRP’s price formed a lower low, while RSI formed a higher low. This is a pattern that often appears near potential trend reversal zones, assuming the fact that the broader $XRP price trend still leans bearish.

    Note: While this divergence pattern conceptually hints at a reversal, we would be using the word ‘rebound’ interchangeably, considering the bearish market sentiments.

    Interestingly, $XRP printed a nearly identical divergence earlier. Between February 12 and February 24, the price also made a lower low while RSI formed a higher low. Shortly after that signal appeared, $XRP rallied about 14%, confirming the divergence’s effectiveness.

    Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

    Historical $XRP Pattern: TradingView

    However, technical patterns alone rarely drive price moves. The strength of the current divergence becomes clearer when examining on-chain distribution activity.


    $XRP Distribution Activity Collapses as Selling Sentiment Fades

    One of the most important supporting signals comes from the Spent Coins age band data. This metric tracks how many tokens move on-chain each day, often signaling potential distribution.

    During the earlier February divergence, spent coins declined from 75.58 million $XRP to nearly 43 million $XRP, representing a 43% drop in distribution activity.

    Spent Coins Movement

    Spent Coins Movement: Santiment

    The current divergence shows a far sharper change. On March 7, spent coins surged to 122 million $XRP, signaling heavy coin movement. But by March 8, the figure collapsed to 19.77 million $XRP, marking an over 80% drop in distribution activity.

    <span class=$XRP Coin Activity”>

    $XRP Coin Activity: Santiment

    Such a steep decline in this bearish metric suggests that selling activity may have dried up rapidly after the divergence formed. With fewer coins moving on-chain, the market may be entering a period where holders prefer holding rather than distributing tokens.

    That behavior becomes even more visible when looking at long-term holder accumulation.


    Hodler Accumulation and Derivatives Strengthen the Reversal Setup

    Another key indicator is Hodler Net Position Change, which tracks how much supply long-term holders accumulate or distribute over a 30-day period.

    During the February divergence, this metric showed only modest growth. On February 12, the net position change stood near 126.8 million $XRP, rising slightly to about 149.3 million $XRP by February 24—an increase of roughly 17%.

    The current divergence shows stronger conviction. By March 3, the metric had dropped sharply to around 41.4 million $XRP, but it rebounded quickly to 211.6 million $XRP by March 8 when the divergence appeared.

    Compared with the 149 million $XRP level seen during the previous rebound signal (February 14), the current figure represents roughly 42% higher accumulation, indicating stronger holder conviction behind the potential reversal setup.

    Hodler Net Position Change

    Hodler Net Position Change: Glassnode

    But spot market behavior is only part of the story. Derivatives positioning suggests another possible catalyst.

    Derivatives data shows that short positions dominate $XRP’s leverage structure. Liquidation data, per the $XRP/USDT pair on Binance alone, indicates that roughly $110.8 million in short leverage sits above current prices, compared with only $42.1 million in long leverage. In other words, short exposure is about 163% larger than long exposure.

    More importantly, over 50% of these short liquidations cluster around the $1.39 level.

    $XRP Liquidation Map: Coinglass

    If $XRP pushes toward $1.40 (a round figure), a large portion of these short positions could be forced to close. This type of forced buying, known as a short squeeze, often accelerates upward momentum.


    $XRP Price Levels That Could Confirm a Reversal

    From a technical perspective, $XRP must first overcome $1.40, the level where large clusters of short liquidations sit. A break above that zone could trigger further upside toward $1.54, representing roughly 10% upside from current levels.

    If momentum strengthens further, $XRP could target $1.61, marking a potential 20% rally from the current range. The 10% to 20% rally range aligns with the bullish push seen during the historical divergence pattern from earlier.

    However, downside risks remain. If $XRP drops below $1.32, the current divergence structure would weaken. A deeper move under $1.27 would invalidate the bullish setup entirely and reinforce the broader bearish trend.

    $XRP Price Analysis: TradingView

    For now, $XRP sits at a technical crossroads. A historical divergence has returned, distribution activity has dropped sharply, and holder accumulation has strengthened. Whether these signals translate into a true trend reversal may depend on whether buyers can push the price beyond the $1.40 trigger level.

    The post Historical $XRP Pattern Returns as One Bearish Metric Drops 80% — Trend Reversal Ahead? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

  • Another Important Milestone for the Cryptocurrency Ecosystem Passed! The 20 Millionth BTC Successfully Minted!

    Another Important Milestone for the Cryptocurrency Ecosystem Passed! The 20 Millionth BTC Successfully Minted!

    The cryptocurrency ecosystem has passed another significant milestone. The 20 millionth unit of Bitcoin, the world’s first and largest cryptocurrency, has been successfully minted. This development is considered a major milestone reached by the Bitcoin network approximately 17 years, 2 months, and 1 week after the first block was created in January 2009.

    The Bitcoin network is built on a system with a total supply limited to 21 million. With the creation of the 20 millionth Bitcoin, the total amount in circulation has reached approximately 95.2% of the theoretical supply. This demonstrates that Bitcoin’s scarcity-based economic model is becoming increasingly evident.

    According to blockchain data shared by the crypto data platform Mempool, the Bitcoin in question was mined in block number 939,999 on the network. This block was produced by the US-based mining pool Foundry USA. This marks another historic milestone in Bitcoin mining.

    Due to Bitcoin’s block production mechanism, the rate at which new coins are mined decreases over time. The halving process, which occurs approximately every four years, reduces the block reward given to miners, thus slowing down the production of new Bitcoins. This mechanism ensures that the total supply of the network increases in a controlled and predictable manner.

    According to experts, mining the remaining approximately 1 million Bitcoins will take a very long time. Under current protocol rules, this amount is expected to gradually enter circulation through mining over the next 114 years.

    Crypto market analysts say that the mining of the 20 millionth Bitcoin once again highlights the digital asset’s limited supply model and creates a psychological threshold that could affect price dynamics in the long term.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Eyes State Stablecoin Framework Following Senate Passage

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Eyes State Stablecoin Framework Following Senate Passage

    In brief

    • The Florida State Senate passed Senate Bill 314 unanimously on Friday, positioning Florida to join other states with local stablecoin regulations.
    • Florida Governor Ron DeSantis plans to review the legislation in its final form once it’s “delivered to his desk,” a spokesperson told Decrypt.
    • The bill folds stablecoins into Florida’s existing anti-money laundering laws by defining them as a form of “monetary value.”

    Florida moved closer to becoming the latest U.S. state to enact stablecoin rules at the local level, following the State Senate’s passage of Senate Bill 314 on Friday.

    Sam Armes, founder and President of the Florida Blockchain Business Association, described Senate Bill 314’s passage as a historic moment on X. He believes the bill will be signed by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, a crypto advocate, within the next 30 days.

    A spokesperson for DeSantis told Decrypt that the governor has not yet received the bill from the legislature. “Once delivered to his office, he will review it in its final form,” she added.

    The measure, which passed unanimously on Friday, folds stablecoins into the Sunshine State’s existing regulations by explicitly defining them as a form of “monetary value” under the Florida Control of Money Laundering in Money Services Business Act.

    The legislation meanwhile authorizes the Florida Department of Financial Services to accept approved stablecoins for payments, such as state-issued licenses and taxes, alongside a pilot program to study how the government could utilize stablecoins itself.

    Republican Florida State Senator Colleen Burton told lawmakers that the legislation aims to integrate state oversight with federal guidelines, as established under a dual-track system in the GENIUS Act—a federal framework for stablecoins passed into law last year.

    “It’s important that we do this today,” she said, noting that the bill would allow Florida’s Office of Financial Regulation to become the primary regulator of payment systems using stablecoins.

    In many ways, Florida’s framework for stablecoins mirrors rules pertaining to traditional transactions. That includes requiring so-called money services businesses to maintain records of stablecoin transactions valued at more than $10,000, which is already the case for other digital assets defined as “virtual currencies.”

    In 2019, Texas became the first state to recognize stablecoins as a form of “monetary value” regarding money transmission rules, according to analysis from law firm Paul Hastings. In 2023, additional rules were adopted under that state’s Money Services Modernization Act.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Kalshi Sued Over Refusing to Pay Out Prediction Market After Iran Leader’s Death

    Kalshi Sued Over Refusing to Pay Out Prediction Market After Iran Leader’s Death

    In brief

    • Kalshi is facing a lawsuit in California over its resolution of a market related to the former Iranian leader.
    • The prediction market opted to utilize a rules provision called the “death carveout,” which effectively resolved and paid the market on its last traded price.
    • Plaintiffs allege the market’s rules were not disclosed prominently enough and are seeking compensation for their positions.

    Popular prediction markets platform Kalshi is facing a class action lawsuit related to its handling of a market on the unseating of Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.  

    Filed in the District Court for the Central District of California, the suit alleges that the platform ran a “predatory scheme to exploit retail consumers” by creating expectations that it would pay out correct predictions, yet failed to do so in its recent “Ali Khamenei out as Supreme Leader?” market. 

    The plaintiffs allege that they expected that in the event of Khameni’s death—which was confirmed by multiple outlets on February 28—holding contracts for Khameni out by March 1 would resolve to “yes,” ultimately paying each share $1 as a correct prediction. 

    Instead, the prediction market utilized a “death carveout provision,” a rules clause which indicated that if the Supreme Leader left office “solely because they have died,” then the market would “resolve based on the last traded price.” In other words, with this clause, the exchange did not pay out “yes” shares at $1.00, as expected by the plaintiffs. 

    “Plaintiffs and the proposed class members—who correctly predicted the outcome—did not receive the amounts they were promised,” the suit reads. “Plaintiffs Risch and Gliksman, like thousands of other consumers who correctly predicted the outcome, received arbitrary amounts unilaterally determined by [Kalshi] that were significantly lower than their respective contract values.” 

    As social media pushback began to build on February 28, the day of Khameni’s death, Kalshi CEO Tarek Monsour took to X to explain his firm’s decisions. 

    “We don’t list markets directly tied to death,” he said. “When there are markets where potential outcomes involve death, we design the rules to prevent people from profiting from death. That is what we did here.” 

    The plaintiffs allege those rules, like the death carveout “upon which defendants relied was not adequately disclosed to plaintiffs or the proposed class members at the time they entered into their trades.” 

    “In these instances, we make the caveat clear in the rules and in the market page, but today is a good learning that we can do more in terms of improving the UX and adding more ways to surface the rules,” said Monsour. 

    As a result, the firm reimbursed all fees and net losses, with Monsour highlighting that “no trader lost money” on the market. 

    Plaintiffs in the case held around $259.84 worth of positions in the market, which ultimately generated more than $54 million in total trading volume. 

    In the suit’s relief requests, plaintiffs and all others similarly situated are requesting compensatory damages representing the full value of “yes” payouts, and “punitive damages in an amount sufficient to punish defendants and deter similar conduct in the future.” 

    “We stand by principle and law,” Mansour posted on X in acknowledgement of the suit, reiterating that the firm didn’t deviate from rules, prevented a market where traders can benefit from a person’s death, and made no money on the market. 

    Kalshi recently raised funds at an $11 billion valuation as prediction markets surge in popularity and trading volumes. (Disclaimer: Decrypt’s parent company, Dastan, operates the prediction market platform Myriad.) 

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.