Author: rb809rb

  • How This Active Mom of 2 Is Thriving With ‘Chemo-Resistant’ Colon Cancer

    How This Active Mom of 2 Is Thriving With ‘Chemo-Resistant’ Colon Cancer

    Collage of images: Heather poses proudly during treatment and then smiles with her husband and 2 sonsShare on Pinterest
    Heather Kaiser was diagnosed with early onset colon cancer at 42, but continues to lead a full and healthy life. Image Credit: Healthline/Photo by Heather Kaiser
    • Heather Kaiser was diagnosed with early onset colon cancer at 42. She shares the story of her diagnosis, treatment, and living a full life with cancer.
    • As an overall healthy person, she never expected that her life would be turned upside down with a cancer diagnosis.
    • As a mother of two young boys, Kaiser’s greatest concern was how she could continue to show up for them amid her battle against colon cancer.

    Heather Kaiser is a mom of two boys and an attorney living a full and busy life. When she went in to see her doctor in 2025 at age 42 about gastrointestinal issues, she had no idea she would be facing an indefinite medical journey.

    The doctor sent her home, telling her that her symptoms were most likely related to hormones or her diet. She began to feel better and joked to her friends that there was no way she could have cancer.

    However, her symptoms soon returned despite eating a healthy diet. Within a month of symptom recurrence, Kaiser found herself in the emergency room. She was once again sent home, this time being told that it was “women’s issues.”

    At a follow-up with her OB-GYN, she said her symptoms were finally being taken seriously, and she received a referral to a gastroenterologist.

    However, when she came out of a colonoscopy, the doctor was visibly upset. He told her, “I cannot believe I have to tell you this. I found a mass the size of a fist.” He continued to tell her that it would have to be surgically removed and that it was most likely cancer.

    “I held out hope for a good week, as we waited for pathology,” Kaiser said. “But when I got it back, I was like, ‘OK, so … I have cancer.’”

    She didn’t tell anyone, even her husband, for at least a day. She needed the time to process the news herself before she told others.

    “We all believed that we had caught it early, and I was just gonna be able to do surgery,” Kaiser said. “It just hasn’t been my story.”

    It was initially thought that Kaiser had a traditional form of colon cancer, which is generally slow-growing.

    After talking with surgeons, she scheduled her surgery for June 2025, six months after her initial visit to the ER.

    “[It] was kind of far out, but there was life going on. I have two small boys, who were 10 and 5 at the time. I wanted to wait until they were done with school,” she said.

    While the surgery went well overall, Kaiser’s surgeon was fairly certain they didn’t achieve clean margins. Clean margins indicate that no cancer cells were present at the outer edges of the tissue removed during surgery.

    Kaiser was then referred to an oncologist, who sent the tumor out for genetic testing.

    “I remember sitting in the hospital, and I was so afraid of chemo,” she said. “I was afraid of how I was gonna feel, how I was gonna look, and mostly, how I was gonna be able to show up as a mom.”

    Typically, colon cancer spreads to the lungs and liver. However, in her case, it spread to the lymph nodes surrounding the lungs and the liver.

    Kasier’s health team noted how unusual this was and wanted to wait for her biomarker results before making a treatment plan.

    When the biomarker testing results came back, Kaiser learned that she had a unique type of colon cancer called BRAF, a mutation only present in around 10% of metastatic colorectal cancers.

    Kaiser had a BRAF mutation known as V600E, which appears in approximately 96% of BRAF colorectal cancer.

    This meant that there would be a completely different treatment for her cancer.

    “The prognosis was 13 months,” she said. However, there were clinical trials going on for that specific V600E mutation at the time.

    ‘Patient zero’ in a clinical trial

    In August 2025, she became part of the protocol designed by the BREAKWATER clinical trial. She was the first person in Minnesota to participate in this protocol outside the trial.

    “I called myself Patient Zero, even though I’m sure I was never [actually] called that!” Kaiser joked. “Mayo Clinic was following me, Minnesota Oncology was following me, I’m being followed by the [University of Minnesota], because I’m just so new.”

    She began a regimen of four different drugs — three were administered by IV, and one was an oral medication called Braftovi.

    Prior to Braftovi, Kaiser’s specific colon cancer mutation was chemo-resistant, which is why her outlook was so grim.

    However, Braftovi not only targets the cells that allow cancer to reproduce, but also enhances the effects of other drugs.

    “I was really cold sensitive. I couldn’t have anything cold. I couldn’t touch anything cold. It was really rough,” Kaiser said.

    She tried many medications to help with symptoms like nausea, but nothing worked. She felt like she would just have to live with the nausea and spend her life eating toast and applesauce all the time.

    “I take an oral cannabis pill. And that finally helped with the nausea. I take it before bed, and I take a gummy in the morning to help with the nausea and fatigue during the day.”

    Kaiser went in for her first CT following treatment in October 2025. She had done eight rounds of treatment at that time.

    “The CT scan came back, ‘complete response to treatment, no evidence of disease,’ which was a shock. It was a shock to my doctors. They didn’t even see those kinds of fast results in the trial.”

    Kaiser’s doctors began to examine what might have contributed to her remarkable response to the treatment.

    They said her age and overall health were possibilities. She had always exercised regularly and had continued to do so through treatment.

    “My oncologist also thought that my positive attitude contributed to my quick response,” she said.

    Despite her CT results, Kaiser has had to continue treatment. This is because the V600E mutation isn’t curable and doesn’t go into remission.

    “They’ve never had anyone live for five years yet,” Kaiser said. “But they just don’t have people who are living and not treating.”

    Now, at 43, Kaiser said that despite her stage 4 cancer diagnosis, she leads a full and busy life.

    The most challenging part, she said, is navigating motherhood, work, and family life without the energy and stamina she once had.

    Still, Kaiser’s supportive community of family, friends, and neighbors has made a big difference in her recovery and ongoing treatment. Knowing she has help when she needs it, and even when she doesn’t know she needs it, has allowed her to continue working full-time and be the best mom to her boys she can be.

    Kaiser said the best advice she can give to people who are living with cancer, especially those like her who face indefinite treatment, is the way she has lived since she began treatment.

    “The best thing to do for me was to plan my life, and then just fit cancer in there, rather than [allowing] cancer to run my life,” she said.

    Kaiser added that she tries to run her life first and then make space for the cancer.

    “I have this really busy, awesome, full life, and I have a chronic disease I also have to treat,” she said.

    Kaiser currently works with the legal team of RVO Health, the parent company of Healthline.

  • The US government wants Reddit to snitch on one of its users through a grand jury

    Immigration and Customs Enforcement has a certain Redditor in its crosshairs and it’s now strong-arming the social media platform to reveal who they are with a grand jury subpoena, according to a report from The Intercept. The nonprofit news outlet was able to obtain the subpoena that ordered Reddit to provide info on one of its users who’s been accused of criticizing ICE by April 14.

    According to the report, ICE has been trying to identify this Redditor for a month without success. More specifically, Reddit is being asked to give up the user’s name, address, phone number and other personal data. The Intercept reported that the subpoena was issued by federal prosecutors in Washington, D.C. after a failed attempt from ICE to do the same through a federal court in Northern California, which has jurisdiction in San Francisco where Reddit is headquartered.

    Reddit attorneys said their client’s posts and anonymity are protected under the First Amendment and described ICE’s use of a grand jury as “a disturbing escalation,” according to the report. Reddit didn’t state if it would challenge the government’s order or not, according to The Intercept, but it did provide a statement saying, “privacy is central to how Reddit operates and we take our commitment to protecting that seriously.” Reddit also said in the statement that it does “not voluntarily share information with any government, especially not on users exercising their rights to criticize the government or plan a protest.”

    While this grand jury subpoena could set an alarming precedent, it’s not the first time a government agency has requested social media platforms reveal accounts that have spoke negatively about ICE. According to a New York Times report, the Department of Homeland Security has filed hundreds of subpoenas to Google, Discord, Meta and even Reddit again, for identifying details about its users.

  • Apple reportedly testing out four different styles for its smart glasses that will rival Meta Ray-Bans

    Apple may be late to the smart glasses market, but it could be covering all its bases with up to four potential styles for its upcoming product. According to Bloomberg‘s Mark Gurman, Apple could launch some or all of the four styles it’s currently testing for its smart glasses.

    Gurman reported Apple is testing out a large rectangular frame that’s comparable to Ray-Ban Wayfarers, a slimmer rectangular design like the glasses that Apple CEO Tim Cook wears, a larger oval or circular frame and a smaller oval or circle option. Apple is also working on a range of colors, including black, ocean blue and light brown, according to Bloomberg.

    Internally code-named N50 for now, Apple’s upcoming smart glasses will compete directly with the second-gen Ray-Ban Meta model. While similar, Apple might be differentiating its design with “vertically oriented oval lenses with surrounding lights,” according to the report. Like Meta’s smart glasses, Apple’s upcoming product will capture photos and videos, but is meant to better sync with an iPhone, allowing users to take advantage of Apple’s ecosystem for editing, sharing, phone calls, notifications, music and even its voice assistant, according to Gurman. The release of Apple’s smart glasses could even coincide with the upcoming improved Siri that should arrive with iOS 27.

    Gurman reported that Apple could reveal its smart glasses as soon as the end of 2026 or early 2027, followed by an official release sometime in 2027. As for the competition, Meta released its latest model that’s better suited for prescription lenses and offers a more customizable fit.

  • SEC and CFTC Fast-Track US Crypto Oversight Using Interpretive Rules to Bypass Lengthy Rulemaking

    SEC and CFTC Fast-Track US Crypto Oversight Using Interpretive Rules to Bypass Lengthy Rulemaking

    U.S. regulators are accelerating crypto oversight by using interpretive rules, signaling a faster policy rollout strategy that prioritizes immediate clarity over traditional rulemaking processes.

    Key Takeaways:

    • Government Accountability Office (GAO) highlights fast-track crypto rules, boosting momentum across markets.
    • SEC and CFTC move quickly with interpretive approach, reducing friction for digital asset expansion.
    • Crypto framework signals lower barriers for issuers, supporting broader adoption and scalability.

    Regulators Accelerate Crypto Oversight Using Interpretive Rules

    A Government Accountability Office (GAO) review clarifies how U.S. regulators are advancing crypto policy while avoiding a judgment on the rule itself. The GAO, a congressional watchdog, issued its report on a joint rule from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 8. The report confirms the procedural path used to implement the rule, offering insight into regulatory strategy rather than policy effectiveness across digital asset markets.

    The document makes clear that the agencies framed the rule as an interpretive measure, which is central to understanding its rollout. The report states:

    “This rule provides an interpretation of the definition of ‘security’ as applied to crypto assets.”

    That classification determines which legal requirements apply and which can be bypassed. By documenting this framing, the GAO confirms regulators selected a faster, lower-friction route to introduce crypto guidance within existing securities law structures.

    That choice allowed the SEC and CFTC to avoid standard procedures tied to major financial rules. The report notes: “The Agencies determined that the interpretation in this rule may take effect immediately pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 808(2) because it is an interpretive rule and thus exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act’s notice and comment requirements.” Section 808(2) is a provision under the Congressional Review Act that permits immediate implementation of certain rules when agencies justify bypassing delays. The GAO also recorded:

    “In its submission to us, the agencies indicated that they did not publish a proposed rule or solicit public comments.”

    For market participants, this signals a regulatory preference for speed and clarity over extended consultation.

    GAO Highlights Speed Over Process in Crypto Rulemaking Strategy

    The report also highlights how regulators are positioning the rule’s economic impact without supporting it with formal analysis. According to the GAO, the agencies argued the framework “should reduce costs for issuers of digital securities and crypto asset-related securities.”

    At the same time, they indicated that a cost-benefit analysis was not required. This reflects a broader pattern in crypto oversight, where interpretive guidance advances policy objectives while limiting procedural obligations. The GAO’s role is to record these claims for congressional visibility, not to validate them.

    Ultimately, the GAO review functions as a procedural checkpoint that informs Congress while signaling how regulators are structuring crypto policy. It noted that the agencies classify crypto assets into categories “based on their characteristics, uses, and functions.” That framework suggests a systematic approach to aligning digital assets with securities laws. While the report does not assess effectiveness, it confirms that U.S. agencies are using interpretive authority to accelerate crypto rulemaking, a trend likely to shape market structure going forward.

  • ‘First Crypto Bank’—Kraken’s Fed Approval Sparks $100K Bitcoin Warning

    ‘First Crypto Bank’—Kraken’s Fed Approval Sparks $100K Bitcoin Warning

    “The Federal Reserve officially approves Kraken Financial as the first digital asset bank with direct access to the United States’ payment systems,” the popular Bitcoin curation account @DocumentingBTC posted on X this week, racking up over 3,000 likes. The post set off a wave of commentary about what it means when a crypto company gets the same kind of Fed access that traditional banks have guarded for decades.

    Bitcoin is trading near $70,000. Some market watchers think the Kraken news is exactly the kind of institutional plumbing upgrade that could push prices toward $100,000.

    What Happened To Kraken

    The Kansas City Fed approved Kraken Financial, a Wyoming-chartered Special Purpose Depository Institution, for a limited-purpose Federal Reserve master account on March 4. The term is one year. The access is restricted. But the symbolism is hard to miss.

    Kraken Co-CEO Arjun Sethi told Fortune that Kraken went through Wyoming to get a Special Purpose Depository Institution charter rather than the OCC route other crypto firms have tried. Kraken’s head of policy Jonathan Jachym told Reuters the approval is “a great testament to regulatory rigor and cooperation,” adding that it “promotes principles of both safety and soundness, and innovation.” The account lets Kraken hold balances at the Fed and settle in U.S. dollars on Fedwire, bypassing the correspondent banks that crypto firms have relied on for years.

    The reaction on X was not universally positive. “ICBA and 42 state banking associations objected to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s approval of a master account for Kraken Financial,” the Independent Community Bankers of America posted on their official account. Representative Maxine Waters, the ranking Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, demanded the Kansas City Fed explain its legal authority for the decision.

    One anonymous trader on X captured the skeptics’ view: “Kraken’s Fed approval… isn’t pure adoption; it’s assimilation. Don’t mistake integration for decentralization.”

    Why It Matters For Bitcoin’s Price

    The Kraken news lands at a moment when institutional money is already flowing back into bitcoin. Spot bitcoin ETFs pulled in $789 million last week, the highest weekly total since February. BlackRock continues to lead those flows.

    Charles Schwab, which serves roughly 39 million brokerage clients, recently published a risk-sizing framework showing that an aggressive portfolio model could hold up to 8.8% in bitcoin under certain return assumptions. Schwab stopped short of calling it a recommendation, but the signal caught attention across crypto X. Pete Rizzo, the Bitcoin historian and former CoinDesk editor, posted that “$11 trillion Schwab just told 40 million clients to add bitcoin to their portfolios,” a characterization that got over 2,000 likes even if it overstated what Schwab actually said.

    Kevin Olsen, a payments industry educator who runs the Payments Professor YouTube channel, analyzed the Kraken approval in a video and predicted this is “merely the first of many approvals, signaling a permanent shift in how electronic banking and crypto institutions interact with sovereign financial rails.”

    Bitcoin has gained about 3% this week, bouncing between $70,300 and $73,200. The $75,000 level is the next test.

    The Bull Case

    Pierre Rochard, CEO of Bitcoin Bond Company and a longtime Bitcoin advocate, put it bluntly on X: “No four-year halving cycle has ever had a consistent bid from institutional and sovereign wealth quite like what we’re seeing in 2026.” His argument is that the old four-year boom-bust pattern is breaking because institutions are now permanent buyers, not tourists.

    The numbers back him up. Morgan Stanley launched its own low-fee bitcoin ETF (MSBT) on April 8, charging just 0.14%. “Morgan Stanley just handed Bitcoin to 16,000 wealth advisors managing $6.2 trillion in client assets,” posted Garry Krug, head of BTC strategy at aifinyo. “Their recommended allocation for growth portfolios: 2-4%.”

    Wall Street price targets for year-end 2026 are stacking up. Standard Chartered’s Geoff Kendrick is at $100,000. TD Cowen has a $140,000 target tied to bitcoin treasury companies. Bernstein is at $150,000. Tom Lee at Fundstrat has floated $200,000 to $250,000. The Kraken approval feeds directly into every one of these theses because it removes a layer of friction between institutional dollars and the crypto ecosystem.

    The Bear Case

    The one-year term on Kraken’s account tells you something. The Fed is treating this as a trial, not a verdict.

    “TD Cowen has cut its Strategy price target by 20.5% to $350, projecting the company’s Bitcoin gains will fall to $7.87 billion in 2026 from $10.17 billion in 2025,” CoinMarketCap reported. That is the same TD Cowen with a $140,000 bitcoin target cutting its bet on the biggest corporate bitcoin holder. Mixed signals, to say the least.

    Not everyone on X is buying the institutional narrative either. “Expecting under $50K by November 2026,” one trader posted, arguing that short-term rallies to $80,000 or $90,000 will give way to a deeper correction. Another anonymous account pegged their year-end target at $52,500, citing historical pattern analysis.

    Then there is the political risk. Waters’ investigation could lead to legislation restricting crypto companies from accessing Fed payment systems. The ICBA has 42 state banking associations backing its opposition. If Congress moves to pull the plug on Kraken’s experiment, the bullish narrative flips overnight.

    What To Watch Next For Bitcoin Price

    The big question is whether Kraken stays alone or other firms follow. Jachym has said the approval shows the regulatory path exists for any well-capitalized digital asset company willing to go through the process.

    Bitcoin sitting at $70,000 with that $75,000 barrier overhead. A break through on heavy volume, combined with continued ETF inflows and more broker launches like Morgan Stanley’s MSBT, would be the kind of technical confirmation that turns Wall Street’s $100,000-plus targets from speculation into consensus.

  • Britney Spears Enters Rehab After DUI Arrest

    Britney Spears Enters Rehab After DUI Arrest

    Britney Spears has checked into a treatment facility following a DUI arrest last month.

    A rep for Spears confirmed to The Hollywood Reporter that the singer voluntarily entered rehab on Sunday.

    Spears, 44, was arrested on March 4 for driving under the influence, and then released from jail a day later in Southern California, according to the Ventura County Sheriff’s Department. The singer is due to make a court appearance on May 4 at the Ventura County Superior Court.

    “This was an unfortunate incident that is completely inexcusable,” a rep for Spears told THR at the time of her DUI arrest. “Britney is going to take the right steps and comply with the law and hopefully this can be the first step in long overdue change that needs to occur in Britney’s life. Hopefully, she can get the help and support she needs during this difficult time. Her boys are going to be spending time with her. Her loved ones are going to come up with an overdue needed plan to set her up for success for well being.”

    Spears has previously admitted issues with substances and briefly entered rehab at Eric Clapton’s Crossroads facility in Antigua in 2007 following a series of public incidents, including shaving her head. In January 2008, in the midst of a bitter and very public custody battle with ex-husband Kevin Federline, the singer faced several mental health challenges was twice admitted to hospital under a temporary psychiatric assessment ruling, including after an incident in which she allegedly refused to surrender her sons in a stand-off involving police.

    The January 2008 hospitalizations led to a temporary conservatorship that were made permanent later that year. The conservatorship left the singer’s father, Jamie Spears, in charge of making decisions about her career, as well as her estate and financial affairs.

    After 13 years, Spears was finally freed of the conservatorship in September 2021 following a high profile “Free Britney” campaign from fans and prominent celebrities.

  • Elon Musk’s SpaceX Is Nearing Its $1.75 Trillion IPO—Bitget Is Offering Pre-IPO Exposure

    Elon Musk’s SpaceX Is Nearing Its $1.75 Trillion IPO—Bitget Is Offering Pre-IPO Exposure

    In brief

    • Bitget launched IPO Prime, a platform offering tokenized exposure to pre-IPO companies.
    • The first offering is preSPAX, a Republic-issued token tied to SpaceX’s post-IPO performance.
    • The token provides economic exposure without equity ownership, voting rights, or company endorsement.

    Cryptocurrency exchange Bitget launched IPO Prime on Friday, debuting the platform with preSPAX—a token that provides retail investors exposure to SpaceX’s future public market performance.

    The Republic-issued token offers economic upside tied to SpaceX’s eventual IPO or acquisition, marking a new intersection between crypto infrastructure and traditional pre-IPO investing.

    The preSPAX token mirrors potential economic gains from SpaceX upon a qualifying event like an IPO, but grants no equity, voting rights, or ownership in the company. SpaceX has not endorsed or authorized the offering, the same report notes. The subscription window will open from April 18-21, with token distribution and OTC trading scheduled to begin once it closes.

    “IPO Prime allows users to participate earlier in a company’s growth cycle, with the flexibility of continuous trading,” said Bitget CEO Gracy Chen, in a statement. “This shifts how and when investors can engage with emerging companies, which gives retailers and new investors a chance to buy in early.”

    The token launch comes as SpaceX moves toward a public listing. The company confidentially filed with the SEC on April 1, targeting a June 2026 IPO with a valuation of $1.75 trillion while seeking to raise over $75 billion. SpaceX currently trades at a $1.43 trillion valuation on the Nasdaq Private Market, a secondary venue for private company shares.

    Traders on Myriad—a prediction market platform operated by Decrypt‘s parent company, Dastan—strongly believe that SpaceX’s IPO will yield a market cap above $1.3 trillion at the end of the first day of trading, currently penciling in 88% odds.

    Bitget’s entry into tokenized pre-IPO investing reflects broader convergence between crypto and traditional markets. The Seychelles-based exchange, which claims 125 million users, already offers tokenized stocks, ETFs, commodities, and forex alongside cryptocurrencies. Republic previously launched its own rSPAX Mirror Tokens on Solana, offering similar SpaceX exposure.

    The space faces growing competition from both crypto and traditional players. Solana-based PreStocks offers comparable pre-IPO tokens, while established venues like Nasdaq Private Market and Forge Global dominate traditional secondary trading. Major exchanges are expanding their offerings, too, with Coinbase and Kraken offering stock trading options.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • THORChain Interface Records over 1B Swap Volume with Zero-Fee Model Shaking the DEX Landscape

    THORChain Interface Records over 1B Swap Volume with Zero-Fee Model Shaking the DEX Landscape

    A ten-figure volume threshold is a challenge in the fast-paced world of decentralized finance that can only be met by systems that offer real value. Unstoppable Private Wallet recently declared that the custom THORChain interface they built has surpassed the $1 billion swap volume mark. In a time when the entire marketplace has been dealing with “bearish” sentiment for almost a year, this gateway has experienced a surge of activity. This increase represents a shift in users’ attitudes and actions toward obtaining cross-chain liquidity.

    The Appeal of “Zero-Fee” Architecture

    This surge of $1 billion has been generated primarily by disruptive fees that are generally charged within their Fee system. Many businesses on the front-end charge additional fees called “interface fees” that generally range from 0.1% to 0.5% on top of the protocol gas fees. Consequently, the result is often higher transaction fees for consumers accessing our service. A key feature of Unstoppable’s pricing strategy is that it offers no fees for all transactions, an intentional strategy to seize on a greater share of the long-term market.

    The ability to connect directly with customers through an interface has attracted large-volume traders. This is evidenced by dashboard metrics showing that the average swap exceeds $90,000 in value.

    Privacy and the “No-Wallet” Onboarding

    In addition to cost considerations, THORChain‘s innovative architectural design is addressing a common user issue: the need for a “wallet signature” before viewing trading quotes on most DeXes. This update streamlines the user experience, making it easier to access quotes without needing any sort of pre-approval. Conversely, users of Unstoppable’s website can enter detailed transaction parameters without requiring a connection at the outset of the process. This provides a privacy-centric user experience that aligns with Unstoppable’s position as a private wallet provider.

    Additionally, the positions of “No KYC (Know Your Customer)” and “No Surveillance” are a clear nod to the fundamental spirit of cryptocurrency. The increasingly sharp regulation of centralized exchanges by international regulatory bodies has rendered non-custodial, decentralized solutions e.g. a DEX (decentralized exchange) such as THORChain is the last refuge of users looking to conduct independent financial transactions. THORChain’s official documentation states that the protocol is based on continuous liquidity pools, allowing the exchange of one native asset for another, such as Bitcoin for Ethereum. This process does not rely on wrapped tokens or centralized bridges, which are commonly exploited.

    Resilience in a Bear Market

    This $1 billion milestone implies significantly high volume in what would otherwise be considered a bearish market. Users have demonstrated organic usage rather than speculative mania by moving large amounts of capital into and out of positions. These actions are driven by portfolio rebalancing and efficient position management, with minimal slippage and no user interface costs.

    This successful interface illustrates an emerging trend in DeFi protocols being separated from their front ends. THORChain offers liquidity to each protocol but the access point to each protocol determines how the user will experience the protocol. Unstoppable demonstrates that there is still a huge need for professional and permissionless trading tools regardless of market conditions by offering low or no fees and high levels of privacy.

    Conclusion

    With the THORChain interface reaching $1 billion in total volume processed, this milestone is much more than a vanity metric; it serves as a strong proof-of-concept for the next generation of DeFi interfaces. Unstoppable has shown its commitment to enhancing the user’s financial bottom line and their privacy ahead of maximizing short-term fees. This has firmly established Unstoppable’s position within the ecosystem.

    This has really locked Unstoppable’s place in the ecosystem. Now that the market is heading back into a bullish phase, the infrastructure they built to support the next wave of growth has been put through some serious testing. It held up well, and it is now ready to handle transaction volumes that are significantly larger, by an order of magnitude really.

  • Speculations are that the Trump family is looking to distance itself from WLF

    Speculations are that the Trump family is looking to distance itself from WLF

    World Liberty Financial has come under heavy scrutiny, with many throwing the word “scam” on Crypto Twitter, over its recent $WLFI Markets lending position and the sudden disappearance of the Trump family from the WLF team member page.

    Speculations are that the Trump family is attempting to distance itself from World Liberty Financial. But the team is claiming otherwise.

    The crypto project was launched in the fall of 2024, with the U.S. President and his sons, Eric, Trump Jr., and Barron, displayed on the team member page as co-founders, including Chase Herro, Zak Folkman, and the Witkoff family.

    World Liberty was touted as a financial platform that would bridge the gap between traditional banking and decentralized finance. In March 2025, the team completed a third phase of $WLFI token sale, raising a total of $550 million, according to reports. $WLFI, which only became tradable in September 2025, doubles as the governance token of the platform.

    After the presale, however, it was observed that the positions of the Trump family were reduced to “Web3 Ambassador.” And now? The team member page on the website has been removed, with some speculating that the Trumps are trying to distance themselves from the project.

    Just at the bottom of the page, there is now a disclosure that Trump and his sons do not hold any formal operational role in World Liberty Financial, despite their known affiliation with the crypto project.

    “None of Donald J. Trump, his family members or any director, officer or employee of Trump Organization or of DT Marks LLC is an officer, director or employee of, WLF Holdco LLC or World Liberty Financial LLC,” it reads.

    To add weight to these claims, speculators also pointed to Eric Trump deleting several $WLFI-related posts on Twitter earlier this year, as Cryptopolitan reported.

    Eric Trump, co-founder of $WLFI, deleted several $WLFI-related posts on X. Following the move, $WLFI briefly fell more than 8%, while the USD stablecoin $USD1 temporarily depegged to 0.9802 USDT. https://t.co/5W4apuqsb3 pic.twitter.com/7dUMJPApEh

    — Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) February 23, 2026

    “This is clearly FUD,” says Zach Witkoff

    World Liberty Financial CEO Zach Witkoff dismissed these observations as FUD, saying both Donald and Eric Trump are still engaged with the project, and even tweet about the project weekly. Regarding the missing team page, Zach mentioned that the website was redesigned months ago. “This is clearly FUD,” he said.

    Hey @Eljaboom we redesigned the website months ago. Don and Eric tweet about the project weekly and even have @worldlibertyfi in their twitter bios. This is clearly FUD.

    — Zach Witkoff (@ZachWitkoff) April 11, 2026

    Eric Trump’s Twitter bio says he’s an advocate for World Liberty Financial, while Donald Trump Jr.’s still says he’s a co-founder.

    Although the Trump family is not directly involved in the management of World Liberty, according to the webpage, they own a significant 38% stake in the WLF Holdco LLC, through DT Marks DEFI LLC. WLF Holdco LLC holds all of the rights to net protocol revenues from the WLF protocol. Previously, in March 2025, the stake was as high as 60%, according to Reuters.

    DT Marks DEFI LLC also holds 22.5 billion $WLFI tokens, and is entitled to receive 75% of the net revenue from the $WLFI token sale, including interest earned on the reserve assets backing $USD1, a dollar-pegged stablecoin issued by World Liberty Financial.

    WLF loan deal sparks fresh controversy

    Another point of controversy on World Liberty Financial stems from its recent stablecoin loan deal on DeFi protocol Dolomite, whose co-founder advises WLF, which saw $WLFI token decline by 10%, Cryptopolitan reported on Friday.

    The WLF team deposited 5 billion $WLFI tokens, worth $440 million, to borrow $75 million worth of $USD1, although Arkham reports it was $150 million USDC. Part of the concern was that the World Liberty Financial team used its own tokens as collateral to drain Dolomite’s lending pool, so much so that many depositors were not able to withdraw.

    To defuse concerns, the team said being an anchor borrower allows them to generate yield that makes $WLFI Markets compelling for everyone else. “No, we are nowhere near liquidation — and frankly, even if markets moved dramatically against us, we’d simply supply more collateral,” they wrote.

    The last line was particularly concerning for many people, who argued that deploying more volatile governance tokens as collateral could have more detrimental consequences, with some recalling past incidents with Terraforms Lab and FTX.

    Even more retarded, instead of repaying stablecoin debt, they would deposit more $WLFI as collateral.

    Sure, liquidation price decreases but it makes the problem worse, not better in the longer termhttps://t.co/h3YdBMY2ha

    — Ignas | DeFi (@DefiIgnas) April 10, 2026

    $WLFI currently trades at $0.07989, a 1.4% decline in the last 24 hours. The token is down over 44% YTD.

  • ‘Hunting Matthew Nichols’ Review: A Missing Brother’s Cold Case Heats Up In Canadian Found-Footage Horror

    ‘Hunting Matthew Nichols’ Review: A Missing Brother’s Cold Case Heats Up In Canadian Found-Footage Horror

    Though it was not entirely without precedent as the progenitor of faux-found-footage horror, few films have been more widely imitated than 1999’s “The Blair Witch Project” — if only because its premise was so, well, economical. With no pressing need for FX, sets, name actors or stunts, just about anyone could make a marketable knockoff. Unfortunately, almost everyone did, creating an overtaxed genre where mediocre, sometimes barely-watchable titles far outnumber the few inspired entries.

    A notch above-average on that narrow scale, but still falling a bit short, is Canadian actor Markian Tarasiuk’s feature directorial debut. “Hunting Matthew Nichols” earns points for self-awareness: Not only does “Blair Witch” get name-checked here, but the missing-persons cold case it centers on involves two aspiring-filmmaker teens who were obsessed with that popular hit, and indeed may have been trying to recreate it when they disappeared in the forests of Vancouver Island. The film we’re watching is an effort by one boy’s surviving sister to solve the mystery decades later, with Tarasiuk and Ryan Alexander McDonald playing themselves as professionals helping her make a documentary about that quest. Needless to say, something very sinister and deadly lies at the end of their path. 

    That climax is sufficiently creepy. But “Hunting” takes a long time getting there — not even entering the island’s woods until its last lap — a buildup overfilled by that least-appealing staple of found-footage horror movies, i.e. nervous or frightened characters yelling at each other. The result is a competently crafted if unmemorable thriller perhaps most impressive for its off-screen enterprise. The self-distributed indie production opened on over 1000 North American screens (in partnership with various theater chains) on June 10, following an even wider sneak preview the prior week. 

    Mock vintage TV news clips and direct-camera-address from Tara Nichols (Miranda MacDougall) spell out what’s being “hunted” here: Twenty-two years earlier, her older brother Matthew (James Ross) vanished with best friend Jordan Reimer (Issiah Bull Bear) on Halloween night, 2001. They were last seen traipsing into a vast, densely wooded parkland just outside town. When they failed to re-emerge, an extensive search began. Police eventually found their camcorder in a remote abandoned cabin, but no other sign of the boys, and no evidence of foul play. It was assumed they had, like numerous unwary hikers before them, fallen to accidental deaths off a cliff, or into a ravine. Nonetheless, nasty rumors circulated for a time — most casting unfounded suspicions on Jordan’s family, for little reason beyond their being Indigenous people.

    These events occurred when Tara was a child, haunting her since. Now she’s returned from the mainland for the first time since her father’s funeral, in search of “a better answer” to her sibling’s absence. Perhaps as tribute to his passion, she’s turned that inquiry into a film project, with Tarasiuk as director (it’s rather murky whether they’re also in a romantic relationship) and McDonald as cinematographer. They interview her mother (Susinn McFarlen), Jordan’s father (Trevor Carroll), the cop once in charge of the now-cold case (Christine Willes), a former mayor (Bernard Cuffling), and others. Little is gained beyond resuscitated creaky gossip about speculated “Satanic rituals,” and spooky local folklore regarding a 19th-century religious commune that a modern-day anthropologist dismisses as “just an old story to keep kids out of the woods.”

    Still, Tara begins to suspect the authorities are hiding some intel, which is confirmed when she gains possession of the original evidence box. It holds surprises, as well as indications that still more might be missing. Tara grows obsessive to a point of near-hysteria, suggesting she ought to step back and take a mental-health break. Instead, she insists on pressing onward — into the forest itself, with or without her colleagues. Needless to say, that turns out to be a very bad idea.

    It was also arguably a bad idea to keep our protagonists out of the woods for the feature’s entire first hour, though faux archival footage plus actual cinematographer Justin Sebastian’s occasional gorgeous scenic shots provide teasing earlier glimpses. Nonetheless, there’s no immediate peril until the trio finally go camping, at which point things get more actively suspenseful. 

    Tarasiuk doesn’t try all that hard to maintain the mock-doc illusion, with those more-polished images, MacDougall’s histrionic performance, and an effective if sometimes overblown score (by Jeff Griffiths and Christopher King) all poking holes in that ruse. Which would be fine if at least some scares arrived earlier, rather than being held in reserve for so long. Their lack leaves us too much time to grow weary of Tara — whose unraveling under pressure is understandable, yet has an effect on the viewer more exhausting than empathy-inducing. 

    The actress throws herself into it, but less might have been more. It’s also a minus that, by contrast, her costars get so little character definition, despite a surplus of often cliched dialogue. Nor do investigation subjects Matthew and Jordan, seen in old video footage, warrant any deeper interest from Sean Harris Oliver’s screenplay.

    The last few minutes of belated payoff are strong enough. But not so much so that they fully redeem the preceding 80, let alone will make anyone eager for a sequel.