Author: rb809rb

  • Better Late Than Never: Samsung Phones Now Work with Googlebook Laptops

    Better Late Than Never: Samsung Phones Now Work with Googlebook Laptops

    An update to Googlebook OS now lets you use your Samsung phone with Google’s new laptops as originally intended. One of the key Googlebook features is its integration with Android phones, but Google didn’t include Better Together connectivity with Samsung devices at launch.

    A new update rolled out on Saturday, after being announced on Reddit, letting those with a Samsung phone running One UI 9 software connect to Googlebooks. That’s Samsung’s own version of Android 17, which is necessary for these features.

    Better Together tools include Continue On to carry over task progress across devices, Notification Sync to see incoming messages on your laptop, and Quick Access to search for and view your phone’s files on the Googlebook.

    It took Google a week to launch Samsung compatibility, but some early adopters chose to return their devices after discovering it wouldn’t work with their phones immediately.

    If you own a Samsung phone, you should see this update arrive in the coming days. You may already have it, as some users have reported that the features are now available. Alongside One UI 9, you’ll also need Google Play Services version 26.37 on both devices and Cross-Device Services version 1.0.1346.

    According to Google’s update notes, the update also addresses a bug that caused the QR code used to connect your smartphone to the laptop during setup to remain visible after its first use. Google says it now has an overall “smoother first-time setup” with fewer steps than at launch.

    Recommended by Our Editors

    PCMag’s Deputy Managing Editor of Hardware, Joe Osborne, has been testing Googlebook devices for over a week. Osborne says, “If you’ve been craving the kind of direct-device and account-level integration from your current PC laptop or Chromebook with your Android phone, then this is Google’s long-awaited answer.”

    “However, you must temper your expectations of what an Android-based laptop can do. Yes, it can pair with your Android phone and serve up Gemini functions just like your handset can, but it still runs Android apps exclusively.”

    About Our Expert

  • Exclusive: Apple Routed a Graphite Pipe Through the iPhone Duo’s Hinge. Here’s Why

    Exclusive: Apple Routed a Graphite Pipe Through the iPhone Duo’s Hinge. Here’s Why

    The iPhone 18 Pro and 18 Pro Max push the boundaries of what mobile phones can do, such as handling on-device Siri AI calculations and running computational photography algorithms to deliver the best possible images. When it’s released on October 23, the iPhone Duo promises similar capabilities, but in Apple’s first-ever foldable. It’s all made possible by the A20 Pro processor inside the latest iPhone line, a new system-on-a-chip (SoC) from Apple’s engineers that brings laptop-class power to your pocket.

    Developing the SoC posed a tough question for Apple. Would the same chip work in the slab-style iPhone 18 Pros and the iPhone Duo? Each has its own set of requirements and constraints, not only for the chip and its position inside the phone’s chassis, but also for effective heat management. The less room there is, the more difficult it is to move heat away from the components while maintaining performance. Managing thermal conditions plays a vital role in any device, and the limited internal space of slimmer-than-ever phones—including one that folds in half—makes it particularly tricky.

    I spoke with Dan Murray, Apple’s vice president of silicon engineering, and Banafsheh Barabadi, senior manager of thermal product design, to learn how Apple’s engineers navigated these new challenges and squeezed even more performance from the A20 Pro across two very different iPhone designs.

    Confessions of a Fold-aholic: Can the iPhone Duo Break My Samsung Addiction?

    PCMag Logo

    Confessions of a Fold-aholic: Can the iPhone Duo Break My Samsung Addiction?


    Solving the Engineering Puzzle: Pack Laptop-Class Power Into an iPhone

    Apple says the A20 Pro has an “M-class-inspired packaging design.” Macs run on the company’s own M-branded processors, the most current being the M5 Max and M6. These chips power Apple’s MacBook Pros and Mac mini, respectively. The A20 Pro draws some of its basic design elements from the M-line chips—specifically, their layouts.

    Chips designed for phones are often stacked vertically to save space in the X-Y dimensions. Real estate on the logic board is a premium. Although this method saves side-to-side space, it introduces its own issues with data flow and heat. For example, the DRAM module is often placed on top of the processor, which can slow things down.

    “With all of our iPhone SoCs before A20 Pro, we used a packaging technology called package-on-package or POP,” Murray told me. “And with POP packaging, the SoC and DRAM are placed in a vertical stack with the DRAM directly on top of the SoC. But it creates challenges from a thermal perspective. Since the DRAM is physically on top of the SoC, it limits the ability to extract heat from the SoC into the system. So for A20 Pro, we brought a new packaging technology to the iPhone.”

    Apple iPhone 18 Pro, internal view, rear side

    iPhone 18 Pro internal view of the rear panel (Credit: Apple)

    Because laptop chassis have more internal space, the DRAM module can be placed next to the processor, facilitating quicker data speeds and more effective heat management. Apple follows this configuration with the A20 Pro, unstacking the DRAM module, and placing it next to the chip rather than on top of it. This is called a wafer-level multichip module, or WMCM. Though this increases the X-Y dimensions, Apple worked closely with the system team to ensure the phones’ internals could support this slightly larger package.

    Qualcomm made a similar design change to the placement of the DRAM module with its recently announced Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 and 8 Elite Gen 6 chips. The chipmaker’s claims about its performance are lofty, but we won’t be able to fully test this chip until phones built around it arrive later this year.

    Apple says CPU cores and other elements are often developed once within the silicon team and then customized for different devices, such as MacBooks, iPads, and iPhones. The A20 Pro is the company’s first 2nm design for phones, which Murray says delivered greater transistor density, improved power efficiency, and higher performance.

    The chip has two super-cores for short, bursty workloads and four efficiency cores for background tasks and sustained workloads, which Apple says equate to a 20% performance improvement. The A20 Pro adds another GPU core, bringing the total to seven and delivering a 40% gain in graphics performance. The GPU also benefits from a second-generation neural accelerator, which improves throughput by 50%.

    The A20 Pro has twice as many neural engine cores as the A19 Pro, jumping from a single bank of 16 cores to two banks of 16, for a total of 32. Apple says these two engines can be used either independently or in a bonded mode that uses all 32 at once. This is critical for on-device AI calculations.

    Apple iPhone 18 Pro, internal view display side

    iPhone 18 Pro internal view, display side (Credit: Apple)

    The iPhone Duo’s A20 Pro variant is just slightly different. “For iPhone Duo, we added a second display engine to support simultaneous operation of the inner and outer displays,” says Murray, “and with the increased CPU and GPU performance, we ensure we can deliver a smooth user experience across the displays. For the inner display, we also added support for placing the FaceTime camera behind the display.”

    Put this all together, and you have a very powerful chip that runs fast, handles graphics with ease, churns through algorithms in a blink—and puts out a lot of heat. Apple had to rethink its thermal management system to dissipate the high temperatures generated by the processor.


    Keeping Things Cool With Completely Redesigned Thermals

    The iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max were the first iPhones to employ vapor chambers. These assisted the phones’ A19 Pro chip and moved heat from the SoC out to the rear panel, where it could dissipate. Other phone makers have turned to vapor chambers, too. RedMagic, for example, uses a 3D vapor chamber with a composite liquid metal and a fan to keep the 11S Pro gaming phone running cool.

    Apple took the basics of the iPhone 17 Pros’ vapor chamber design and reengineered it not only for the higher temperatures generated by the A20 Pro but also for the different chassis designs of the iPhone 18 Pros and iPhone Duo.

    The phones and processor together “represent a fundamental state change in the thermal design, and it starts with a deep collaboration with the silicon team and the WMCM packaging,” Barabadi told me. “For the first time, we were able to couple silicon directly to our thermal solution, and we designed the entire system around that opportunity.”

    Apple iPhone 18 Pro, internal back view, vapor chamber and battery

    iPhone 18 Pro vapor chamber and battery (Credit: Apple)

    Barabadi explains that Apple followed four pillars in its approach to heat management. The first pillar is the direct silicon access. Because Apple removed the DRAM from the vertical stack, “that [gave] us a direct thermal path to our next generation vapor chamber. It basically eliminates the thermal bottleneck that previously existed on all POP packaging and allows us to extract the heat from the processor far more efficiently.”

    The second pillar is a new material that bridges the gap between the A20 Pro and the vapor chamber. “We call it metal over foam,” says Barabadi, and it “basically creates a direct thermal and mechanically compliant coupling between the SoC and the vapor chamber. It is highly effective in removing the heat, meeting the strict mechanical requirements of the system. It took us months of development to get the material properties exactly right to be able to use this material.”

    The third pillar is the vapor chamber itself, which has a surface area three times larger than that of the one in the iPhone 17 Pro. It also has more de-ionized water inside to cycle heat throughout the structure. In the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max, the vapor chamber does more than simply reroute heat. “It serves as the central structural plane for the device,” explains Barabadi. The battery and the logic board are mounted directly to it. “So what it does is simultaneously [act as] a primary thermal solution and the backbone of the mechanical system. And we use 80% recycled stainless steel for the strength that was required to support the internal components.”

    Apple didn’t stop there. The fourth pillar is a new layer applied to the back of the screen to assist. “We introduced nanotube copper as our new display metal plate material. So this piece … is the back display plate, and what makes this unique is that it’s a new type of material that provides a unique combination of mechanical strength that is required for the display and the high thermal conductivity that hasn’t previously been available in any smartphone. It combines those two together.” A high-conductivity graphite layer is also applied.

    Recommended by Our Editors

    Apple iPhone 18 Pro, internal front view, vapor chamber

    iPhone 18 Pro graphite layer (Credit: Apple)

    Combining the nanotube copper display plate with high-conductivity graphite improves heat spread laterally across the display. It reduces hotspots and improves the overall thermal profile.

    “When we combine these four pillars together, it meaningfully improves the thermal performance across every metric, and these gains are realized across sustained workloads such as gaming and video recording, and also the short-duration bursty workloads, like on-device AI,” notes Barabadi. This is also why the iPhone 18 Pro models can charge faster than older iPhones.


    A Clever Use for the iPhone Duo’s Hinge

    Although most of the engineering described above applies to all three phones, the team had to tackle a different set of thermal challenges with the iPhone Duo.

    Apple iPhone Duo, internal back view

    iPhone Duo internal view (Credit: Apple)

    For the Duo, the team created a different vapor chamber that’s thinner than the one in the iPhone 18 Pro. It’s still integrated into the A20 Pro via the metal-over-foam, but rather than serve as a central piece of the support structure, it floats in the middle. The Duo may be ultra thin when open, but because it’s a folding device, its thickness doubles when closed. This is a problem when it comes to heat.

    “This was one of the most technically challenging aspects of our design,” says Barabadi. To surmount the issue, Apple routed a flexible graphite pipe through the hinge itself to transfer heat between the two halves, thereby increasing the surface area available for heat dissipation. “This part need[ed] to be co-engineered between our thermal team and the mechanical team. It’s a flexible material that needs to survive, as you can imagine, many hinge cycles while maintaining its thermal connectivity, and also its structural integrity throughout the product life cycle.”


    Cooler Systems Yield Improved Performance

    Apple’s goal for the latest iPhones was to enable the “best possible performance,” says Barabadi. “We [are] able to achieve 35% higher sustained GPU performance than iPhone 17 Pro in a form factor that people didn’t think was possible. All of it exists so that the experiences that the people care about most can run harder, longer, and more efficiently than before, such as gaming, camera, and Apple Intelligence. What I find most compelling about this work is that none of it is visible to the user.”

    We’ve seen the results already. In our own testing, the A20 Pro delivered some of the highest benchmark tests we’ve ever recorded. The efficiency gains mean longer-lasting batteries, with the iPhone 18 Pro Max winning a PCMag Lab Award for its record-setting longevity. In my testing, I found Siri AI runs smoothly and delivers more accurate results quicker than ever while the cameras take breathtaking photos and record sharp video, surpassing the performance of last year’s models.

    We haven’t tested the A20 Pro in the iPhone Duo just yet, but we expect to in the coming weeks. Can Apple’s first folding phone stay cool under pressure? Will it provide the same seamless experiences without suffering performance gaps? According to Apple’s Murray and Barabadi, it should run just fine, without overheating.

    We look forward to finding out.

    About Our Expert

  • Quentin Tarantino’s West End Debut ‘The Popinjay Cavalier’ Sets Launch Date at Phoenix Theatre

    Quentin Tarantino’s West End Debut ‘The Popinjay Cavalier’ Sets Launch Date at Phoenix Theatre

    Quentin Tarantino‘s West End debut has set a date.

    The Popinjay Cavalier, from Sony Pictures Entertainment and Sonia Friedman Productions, will open at the Phoenix Theatre on Mar. 18, 2027, with previews from Feb. 23 and booking until June 13. Tickets go on sale Monday, starting at £25 ($33).

    Writer-director Tarantino said: “I’m keen with anticipation to give the West End a great night out.”

    Sacha Baron Cohen, currently starring in Ali G: Who Iz I?, has nabbed the title role in what will also be his first-ever West End appearance. He described his phone call with the auteur: “I said yes before he even got to say his first ‘motherfucker.’ When the best director in the world calls, you don’t ask questions. I am beyond delighted that we will be losing our West End virginity together. I have made him promise not to be gentle.”

    Set in 1830s Europe, The Popinjay Cavalier is a “swash-buckling, rambunctious comedy of deception and disguise inspired by the grand swashbuckling epics of stage and screen.”

    The production company continued: “A sweeping celebration of theatre and its heightened romance, told with Tarantino’s signature style and unmistakable wit, The Popinjay Cavalier is inspired by the classic swashbuckler genre of old Hollywood, including the writings of George Bruce, Ernst Vajda and Jesse Lasky Jr.”

    Also announced today is the creative team joining Tarantino: scenic and costume design is by Tom Pye; with lighting design by Natasha Chivers. Sound design is by Ian Dickinson; the fight director is Philip d’Orleans; the action co-ordinator is Sam Lyon-Behan; music is by Tim Phillips; casting by Jim Carnahan, CSA; and the associate director is Jack Bradfield.

    Full casting will be announced at a later date.

  • Oval Office spat to public rebukes: A timeline of Trump-Zelenskyy ties

    Oval Office spat to public rebukes: A timeline of Trump-Zelenskyy ties

    United States President Donald Trump has called for the removal of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy after blaming the Ukrainian leader for rising diesel prices, which have put pressure on the Republican Party ahead of the November midterm elections.

    The criticism on Saturday came as tensions between the US and Ukraine have increased after Trump announced a diesel supply deal with Russia.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    “I think it’s ⁠⁠⁠⁠time for Ukraine to get a new president,” Trump told reporters at the White House on Saturday, saying Zelenskyy had hurt global diesel supplies with strikes on Russian refineries.

    “He wants to make problems for our farmers, our ranchers with diesel fuel because Russia supplies a large portion of the diesel fuel throughout the world,” Trump added.

    Zelenskyy on Sunday pushed back, vowing to continue striking Russian oil refineries. “Ukraine will be ready to stop striking Russian oil refineries if Russia stops striking our energy infrastructure,” Zelenskyy wrote on X.

    “It is possible to stop strikes on energy infrastructure as early as today, but (Russian President Vladimir) Putin does not want to do so,” he said.

    This is not the first time Trump has lambasted Zelenskyy. Their tense relationship goes back to Trump’s first term as president, when he pressured Zelenskyy to investigate his rival, Joe Biden, and his son, Hunter Biden.

    Here’s a timeline of some of the occasions when Trump has been critical of Zelenskyy:

    October 2026: In his remarks at the White House, Trump criticised Zelenskyy over the lack of a peace deal while demanding an end to Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy facilities.

    “I said to him, ‘Do what you want. Don’t hit refineries. There’s plenty of targets. Don’t ‌‌‌‌hit ‌‌‌‌refineries.’ And he went out and he hit,” Trump said. “He better damn well stop.”

    “I suggest they get a new leader who can make a deal because he could have made many deals, but for some reason, he never does,” Trump added.

    Trump, who has been urging Zelenskyy to stop attacking Russian energy infrastructure for weeks, struck a deal with Putin on Friday to buy diesel from Russia in an attempt to reduce high fuel prices.

    The deal marked a stunning reversal of years of Washington’s pressure on Russia over its full scale invasion of Ukraine.

    Zelenskyy, meanwhile, said every additional $1bn Russia earns from exports would help pay for weapons components, drone upgrades, missile production and the recruitment of mercenaries.

    Moscow would only be ready to stop when its ability to fight diminished, he added.

    April 2025: On April 15 , Trump criticised Zelenskyy and implied Kyiv had started the war against Russia, saying the Ukrainian leader was “always looking to purchase” US missiles. “You don’t start a war against someone 20 times your size and hope people give you some missiles,” Trump said.

    Then on April 23 , he criticised Zelenskyy for making “very harmful” statements after the Ukrainian president pushed back against the idea of ceding occupied Crimea to Russia in a potential peace deal.

    Zelenskyy had ruled out ceding any territory, declaring, “There is nothing to talk about – it is our land, the land of the Ukrainian people”.

    In a post on his social media platform, Trump accused Zelenskyy of stoking tension by “boasting” that Kyiv would not legally recognise ceding Crimea to Russia.

    “This statement is very harmful to the Peace Negotiations with Russia,” Trump said, adding that Russia invaded the Crimean Peninsula and annexed it back in 2014 “without a shot being fired”.

    “It’s inflammatory statements like Zelenskyy’s that makes it so difficult to settle this War,” Trump said. “He can have Peace or, he can fight for another three years before losing the whole Country.”

    Despite the tension, the two leaders held a private meeting at the Vatican on April 26, 2025, during Pope Francis’s funeral.

    Feb 28, 2025: During their fiery Oval Office meeting, Trump and Vice President JD Vance clashed with Zelenskyy over rare earth mineral agreements, security assurances and peace negotiations with Russia.

    Trump warned Zelenskyy, “You’re either going to make a deal [on ending the war with Russia] or we’re out,” and accused the Ukrainian leader of having “disrespected” the United States and “overplayed his hand”.

    The US president and Vance also berated Zelenskyy for lacking gratitude and refusing to compromise to end the war, with Trump arguing that Zelenskyy was unready for peace.

    The meeting devolved into a shouting match and Zelenskyy departed the White House abruptly.

    February 19, 2025: A month after returning to power for a second term, Trump called the Ukrainian president a “dictator without elections” and accused him of wanting to keep the “gravy train” of US military support going while Washington tries to end the war with Russia.

    In a lengthy and scathing post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump accused Zelenskyy of taking US money and embroiling the country in an endless conflict.

    He later doubled down on those comments, telling an audience at an investment summit in Miami that Zelenskyy had “done a terrible job, his country is shattered, and millions and millions of people have unnecessarily died”.

    “A dictator without elections. Zelenskyy better move fast or he’s not going to have a country left. Gotta move. Gotta move fast cause that war’s going in the wrong direction,” Trump said on stage at the Future Investment Initiative (FII) Institute summit.

    “In the meantime, we’re successfully negotiating an end to the war with Russia. Something I’ll admit that only Trump is going to be able to do and the Trump administration – we’re going to be able to do it. I think Putin even admitted that,” he said.

    “Biden never tried. Europe has failed to bring peace and Zelenskyy probably wants to, maybe he wants to keep the gravy train going. I don’t know what’s the problem, but he has been able. He’s very upset,” he added.

    Trump had been critical of Biden’s financial and military support to Ukraine during the war. He had vowed to end the war within 24 hours of his taking office, but later said he was being “sarcastic”.

    2024 Campaign trail: On the 2024 US presidential election campaign trail, Trump repeatedly criticised Zelenskyy for not trying hard enough to end Russia’s war on Ukraine. In September, at an election rally speech in North Carolina, Trump lashed out at Zelenskyy for refusing to negotiate, stating that even the “worst deal” or giving up a small amount of territory would be better than ongoing death and destruction.

    July 2019: During his first term, Trump repeatedly urged Zelenskyy to work with Rudy Giuliani and the US attorney general to investigate Democratic political rival Joe Biden. That is according to a five-page memo summarising the July 25 call.

    At the time of the call, the Trump administration was also withholding from Ukraine nearly $400m in congressionally approved security assistance, prompting speculation the US president was using the money as leverage to get his desired investigations.

    Zelenskyy expressed willingness to look into new cases and cooperate with US investigations, though he and Ukrainian officials later maintained they did not feel directly threatened or pressured during the conversation itself.

  • Judge Orders Trump Administration To Stop Running Taxpayer Funded Ads That Promote POTUS

    Judge Orders Trump Administration To Stop Running Taxpayer Funded Ads That Promote POTUS

    A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to stop running taxpayer-funded ads for at least 14 days, putting a halt to the spots that resemble campaign messaging.

    U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon granted a temporary restraining order that prohibits Trump officials from using funds appropriated to the Department of Homeland Security for the ads. The order also will force the administration to cancel the rest of a $20 million purchase of ad time.

    Common Cause, Robert Hunter, Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ and Empire State 32BJ SEIU PAC filed suit to halt the spots, arguing that the ads were overtly political yet were paid for with taxpayer funds. In one case, one of the ads that has been running was almost identical to one that was made for Trump’s 2024 campaign.

    The plaintiffs “have demonstrated that they are likely to succeed on the merits, will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction, the balance of the equities tips in their favor, and an injunction serves the public interest,” the judge wrote.

    The plaintiffs’ coalition said in a statement, “We are pleased the court acted swiftly to prevent more taxpayer dollars from being used for such blatantly unlawful political propaganda. There is no legal justification — and no precedent — for the president to use the machinery of the government and funds set aside by Congress for other uses to influence electoral outcomes that further his own agenda.”

    In a filing before the judge issued her order, the Department of Homeland Security stated that the ads would not continue past Sunday.

    Trump announced last week that his political action committee, MAGA Inc., would start funding the advertising campaign, but he did not say whether the federal government would be reimbursed for the costs already incurred.

    The administration had previously argued that the ads were public service announcements, in line with past presidents. But past administrations produced PSAs to promote programs like the Affordable Care Act and initiatives like vaccinations against Covid.

  • French Committee Backs Stablecoin Swap Tax and Crypto Exit Tax, Then Rejects the Budget

    French Committee Backs Stablecoin Swap Tax and Crypto Exit Tax, Then Rejects the Budget

    In brief

    • France’s Finance Committee adopted an amendment treating swaps of crypto into MiCA-regulated stablecoins as taxable sales from Jan. 1, 2027, and another extending the exit tax to crypto held by households worth more than €800,000.
    • The committee then rejected the budget’s revenue section on Oct. 9 by 31 votes to 3, so the floor debate starts from the government’s original text.
    • A third adopted amendment would let investors carry crypto losses forward for 10 years; the Assembly debates the revenue section from Oct. 13 and votes Oct. 20.

    France’s National Assembly Finance Committee voted this week to tax crypto holders who swap into stablecoins—tokens tied to a single official currency, such as the dollar or the euro—and to charge an exit tax on wealthy holders who move abroad.

    The votes may not matter much yet: on Friday the committee rejected the budget’s entire revenue section by 31 votes to 3, so the full Assembly starts from the government’s original text, without the crypto amendments.

    Myriad: Where does Ethereum go next? Click to make your prediction.
    Myriad: Where does Ethereum go next? Click to make your prediction.

    The committee’s amendments do not carry over to that text, so their backers would have to table them again for the floor debate that begins Oct. 13. Neither measure is law, and both still have to get through the rest of the legislative process.

    The stablecoin amendment, filed by Nicolas Sansu of the left-wing GDR group and 16 co-signers, goes after what the authors call “a hole in the legislation.” Today, swapping Bitcoin for a stablecoin triggers no tax in France, because the state only collects when gains are sold for regular money or spent.

    The text covers the electronic money tokens defined under MiCA, the EU’s crypto rulebook, a category that includes most stablecoins tied to a single currency. From Jan. 1, 2027, swapping into one would count as a sale, with the gain measured against what the holder originally paid.

    The amendment names no rate and defers to France’s flat tax, which rose to 31.4% on Jan. 1 after the 2026 social-security financing law lifted the social-charge portion from 17.2% to 18.6%. The authors insist they are not creating a new burden, only applying existing law to a case it missed.

    The authors say stablecoins can be perfectly ordinary investment vehicles, since they can pay for things at crypto service providers or buy other tokens, so the deferral on swapping into them is unjustified and lets the gain escape the flat tax.

    A second amendment from Sansu would extend France’s exit tax to crypto. That is a levy on gains you have not cashed in yet, charged when you move your tax residence abroad.

    BitcoinBTC · USD

    $82,793−3.62%

    Oct 5Oct 7Oct 9Oct 10Oct 12

    $86.6k$84.6k$82.7k$80.7k

    24h HighHigh$84,231

    24h LowLow$82,957

    VolVol$965.5M

    Market projectionsOdds by Myriad

    →

    It would apply when a tax household’s combined crypto, including holdings kept through custodians, is worth more than €800,000 and the taxpayer was a French tax resident for at least six of the previous 10 years, for moves from Jan. 1, 2027. The threshold matches the one already used for shares, and the payment deferral rules are borrowed from the stock regime.

    Swaps between cryptocurrencies with no cash component would not count as sales for exit-tax purposes. Taxpayers would have to attach a statement of all crypto held on the date of the move, including assets held abroad or in self-custody, meaning wallets they control themselves without an exchange.

    The authors argue that crypto held directly escapes the exit tax today while shares of the same value do not, and they flag how easily digital assets can be moved across borders.

    Daniel Labaronne’s loss amendment also won committee approval. It would let investors carry crypto losses forward for 10 years to offset future gains, as they already can with stocks, whereas today unused losses cannot be carried over.

    The Assembly adopted another crypto-inclusive tax in first reading in late October 2025, voting 163-150 for an amendment creating a 1% annual levy on “unproductive” wealth above €2 million that lumped digital assets in with gold and yachts. Attorney Burçak Ünsal told Decrypt that taxing early token holders was potentially “economically unjust.”

    Coinbase said in October 2024 it would delist stablecoins that fail to comply with MiCA for European customers by Dec. 30, pointing them toward compliant coins like USDC and EURC.

    The floor debate on the budget’s revenue section opens Oct. 13, with a formal vote scheduled for Oct. 20. If the measures return and survive, the stablecoin and exit-tax rules would apply from Jan. 1, 2027.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Did CIA offer buyout to entire workforce? What we know

    Did CIA offer buyout to entire workforce? What we know

    • A rumor spread in the fall of 2026 that the CIA offered eight months’ pay and benefits to employees who agree to quit. The rumor is not new. It first started to spread early in 2025, shortly after U.S. President Donald Trump took office for the second time.
    • The rumor stems from a Feb. 4, 2025, Wall Street Journal report that cited “officials” as saying the scheme was a “bid to bring the agency in line with President Trump’s priorities,” that is, downsizing the government. The report also said the CIA was “freezing the hiring for job seekers already given a conditional offer.” 
    • Since then, further reporting has indicated that in May 2025, CIA Director John Ratcliff announced he intended to cut 1,200 jobs. More recently, in August 2026, an article from the Washington Post said many CIA employees who took the buyouts were still awaiting their retirement due to the sheer number of departures from the agency. The CIA does not release exact staffing numbers.
    • Snopes has not rated the claim because we have not yet independently verified the reporting. We have reached out to the CIA asking for information about the buyout scheme and its current status, and we will update this story if we learn more. 

    In October 2026, social media posts multiplied claiming the CIA offered eight months’ pay and benefits to employees who agree to quit. 

    Several posts on Facebook and X included a video of Fox News presenter Jesse Watters saying, “The Wall Street Journal has reported the CIA has reportedly just offered a buyout to its entire workforce” (archived):

    (X user @WikiLeaksQ)

    The claim is not new. It has been circulating since at least February 2025. 

    The rumor stems from a Feb. 4, 2025, article from the Wall Street Journal that cited “officials” as saying the scheme was a “bid to bring the agency in line with President Trump’s priorities” — namely, downsizing the government. The story also said the CIA was “freezing the hiring of job seekers already given a conditional offer.” 

    The report also quoted an unnamed CIA spokesperson as saying “the move was part of an effort to ‘infuse the agency with renewed energy.’”

    We could not corroborate the report independently, so we left it unrated.

    We reached out to the CIA for more details on staffing plans and we will update this story should we receive a response. 

    Since the publication of the Wall Street Journal article, more reporting has appeared on the staffing situation at the CIA. Layoffs started as soon as March 2025, according to The Associated Press.

    Further, in May 2025, the Washington Post reported that the agency’s then-new Director John Ratcliff had announced he wanted to slash 1,200 at the organization, which works to gather foreign intelligence. 

    “The CIA does not publicly disclose the size of its workforce, but it is believed to be about 22,000,” the report read. “It is unclear which parts of the spy agency would be most affected.”

    Then, in August 2026, another story from the Washington Post said the intelligence agency was struggling to keep up with demands for retirements from former employees due to the sheer number of departures. 

    The agency “gave retirees two toll-free numbers to call if more than six months had passed since they’d received their final paycheck,” the article read. “One former official said she recently spoke to a colleague who retired in March and had just received their first, partial retirement check.”

    For further reading, Snopes has covered several claims about the CIA over the years, including the rumor that late feminist Gloria Steinem had worked for the agency.

  • Did McDonald’s lose lawsuit to TV chef Jamie Oliver over ‘toxic’ food claims?

    Did McDonald’s lose lawsuit to TV chef Jamie Oliver over ‘toxic’ food claims?

    • In October, a claim recirculated online that McDonald’s lost a lawsuit against TV chef Jamie Oliver, who — according to posts — proved that the fast food chain’s food is “unfit for human consumption” because it is “highly toxic.” The claim is unproven. 
    • Snopes previously investigated a variation of this claim in 2018 and September 2026. On each occasion, we found that Oliver said in a 2011 TV program that beef trimmings used for a product he called “pink slime” were “not fit for human consumption.” We found no evidence that he specifically called McDonald’s food “unfit for human consumption” or “toxic,” as numerous posts have repeatedly suggested.
    • The American Meat Institute, a trade association that represents processors of meat and poultry, said in 2012 that beef trimmings used to make “pink slime,” which it calls Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings, are edible.
    • However, because we could not access a full version of the “Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution” episode where Oliver discussed “pink slime” to see if he specifically mentioned McDonald’s, we leave this claim unrated.

    • Snopes will update this report if, or when, additional information surfaces. We contacted Oliver and McDonald’s to ask whether Oliver has ever called the fast food chain’s food “unfit for human consumption” or “toxic” or whether McDonald’s ever lost a lawsuit involving Oliver and are waiting for responses.

    A persistent claim recirculated online at the start of October that fast food chain McDonald’s lost a lawsuit against Jamie Oliver after the TV chef proved the restaurant’s food is “unfit for human consumption” because it is “highly toxic.”

    For example, one Facebook user has written, in part (archived):

    McDonald’s loses lawsuit against chef Jamie Oliver, who proved that the food they sell is unfit for human consumption because it is highly toxic.

    Chef Jamie Oliver won a lawsuit against the world’s largest fast-food chain.

    Oliver demonstrates how hamburgers are made.

    According to Oliver, fatty cuts of meat are “washed” with ammonium hydroxide and then used to fill the hamburger patties. Even before this process, the TV presenter says, this meat was unfit for human consumption.

    Snopes readers contacted us about the claim throughout the start of fall 2026. We previously reported on the claim in September 2026 and January 2018. 

    The claim contains three parts: that McDonald’s sued Oliver, that Oliver made the comments about “pink slime” and that Oliver’s alleged comments were specifically about McDonald’s. 

    We found no evidence in online searches (archived, archived, archived) that McDonald’s ever lost a lawsuit involving Oliver. AFP Fact Check reported in December 2021 that Oliver had never taken legal action against McDonald’s.

    According to an excerpt of a 2011 episode of his program “Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution,” Oliver said that the meat used to produce a specific type of beef product that the celebrity chef called “pink slime” is “not fit for human consumption.” 

    McDonalds reportedly ceased using “pink slime,” which is also known as Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings, in their food in 2011, as we noted in 2018 when we fact-checked a previous version of this claim. Oliver did not mention McDonald’s specifically in excerpts of the 2011 episode of “Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution” that Snopes reviewed.

    However, because we could not access a full version of the “Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution” episode in question to see if it mentioned McDonald’s, we leave this claim unrated.

    Snopes contacted Oliver and McDonald’s to ask whether the fast food chain ever lost a lawsuit involving the TV chef, whether Oliver had ever proved McDonald’s food was “unfit for human consumption” or “toxic,” and to ask whether the restaurant used Select Lean Beef Trimmings in 2026. We await replies to our queries.

    Oliver’s allegations

    In the first episode of the second season of his program “Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution,” in which Oliver attempted to reform school lunches and fight obesity in the U.S., the celebrity chef held a demonstration where he showed children and adults where on a cow different cuts of meat come from.

    According to a segment of the episode (archived) that an internet user uploaded to YouTube in 2016, after spray-painting prices on a live cow to show where various cuts are found, Oliver then addressed what happens to the remainder of the animal. 

    He said (time code 00:01), “The public loved seeing that, that, equalling a steak. They never for a minute thought I would clear all the meat and cuts away and introduce them to a new world of food. It’s called pink slime.”

    Oliver added (time code 00:12), “When you’ve broken down a whole beast, you’re left with trimmings. You know, in my industry, we call those trimmings [BLEEP].” 

    Speaking to a crowd of people, Oliver described the trimmings used for “pink slime” as (time code 00:36) “not fit for human consumption.”

    Oliver went on to say that processing plants took trimmings that were “not fit for human consumption,” separated the meat from the fat, killed harmful bacteria using ammonium hydroxide and sold the end product, which he called “pink slime,” as human-grade food. Ammonium hydroxide is a watery solution that can be used to regulate acidity in food or in hair dye or cosmetics.

    In an excerpt from the program included in a 2012 CBS report, Oliver said (time code 00:32), “We’re taking a product that would be sold at the cheapest form for dogs, and after this process we can give it to humans.”

    (Snopes could not locate a complete video of the “Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution” episode in question. The clips we have found online appeared genuine and do not indicate any signs of possible manipulation.)

    FDA says ammonium hydroxide ‘generally safe’

    Around 11 months after Oliver’s episode discussing “pink slime” aired, the American Meat Institute President J. Patrick Boyle issued a statement to say that Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings is “a safe, wholesome and nutritious form of beef” that helps prevent food waste by utilizing trimmings that would otherwise go to waste.

    The institute is a trade association that represents processors of meat and poultry.

    Boyle’s statement says, similarly to Oliver’s demonstration, that processing Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings involves first separating the meat from the fat and using “food grade ammonium hydroxide gas” to destroy bacteria before blending the product into foods like ground beef.

    However, he denied claims that the trimmings used to create Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings are not edible. The statement says:

    Some recent media reports created a troubling and inaccurate picture, particularly in their use of the colloquial term ‘pink slime.’ The fact is, BLBT is beef. The beef trimmings that are used to make BLBT are absolutely edible. In fact, no process can somehow make an inedible meat edible; it’s impossible. In reality, the BLBT production process simply removes fat and makes the remaining beef more lean and suited to a variety of beef products that satisfy consumers’ desire for leaner foods.

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which regulates ammonium hydroxide use in food, says the ingredient is “generally recognized as safe.” This was also the case when we last reported on these claims in 2018.

    In sum …

    While Oliver did call the cuts of meat used for Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings “not fit for human consumption” and claimed (time code 00:59) the product was “admitted to being in at least 70% of ground beef products” in a 2011 program, the episode excerpts Snopes reviewed do not show him specifically accusing McDonald’s of using the product or calling the fast food chain’s products toxic.

    McDonald’s said in a 2013 statement it had not used Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings in its products since 2011.

    We found no evidence McDonald’s had lost a lawsuit involving Oliver since then. Given the prominence of McDonald’s and Oliver, such a lawsuit would have been widely reported by reputable news media sources. That has not been the case.

    While the FDA generally recognizes ammonium hydroxide, which is used to process Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings, as safe, reporting by food safety publication Food Safety News claimed that fast food giants like McDonalds, Taco Bell and Burger King had all stopped using the product by January 2012.

    Both ABC, which broadcast Oliver’s program, and the chef himself have faced lawsuits over their coverage of the product.

    ABC settled out of court in 2017 in a $1.9 billion defamation lawsuit brought by Beef Products Inc., a producer of Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings, over Oliver’s program and other stories the network had reported about the product in March and April 2012.

    A man who Beef Products Inc. laid off after negative press heavily affected the company’s sales sued Oliver, ABC and other defendants in 2012. He dropped the case in 2013.

    Snopes’ archives contributed to this report.

  • Mum ‘tried to save man from jumping into tiger enclosure’ as harrowing final moments revealed

    Mum ‘tried to save man from jumping into tiger enclosure’ as harrowing final moments revealed

    A mum who says she tried to save a man from jumping into the tiger enclosure before a horror incident at a wildlife park has spoken out about the ordeal.

    Emergency services were contacted shortly after 1.30pm on 10 October when a man had entered the enclosure at the Yorkshire Wildlife Park.

    He was pronounced dead at the scene, South Yorkshire Police have said, with the park still remaining closed amid investigations.

    Videos circulating online appear to show a man being pawed at and grappled by a tiger named Altai in the enclosure at the park, near Doncaster.

    The park said ‘many, many people’ had contacted them about Altai, the Amur tiger involved in the incident, and it confirmed he is ‘safe and well’ and will not be euthanised.

    Visitors who were observing the big cats later revealed how panic ensued as they watched the man grapple with the tiger.

    Police raced to the scene of the tiger incident (SWNS)

    Police raced to the scene of the tiger incident (SWNS)

    A video appears to show the victim sat next to the tiger before being clawed at as he appeared to try and communicate with the animal and was heard shouting “Stop, stop, stop, stop, stop.”

    One witness told LADbible they saw ‘staff running around’ frantically and ushering people towards the exit, ‘but wouldn’t say anything about why’.

    Now, witnesses have told how a mum tried to save the man from jumping into the enclosure.

    Eyewitnesses claimed the victim, who has not been named, posed for a photo with the big cat in the background moments before jumping in from a viewing platform.

    Floral tributes left at the park (Dave Higgens/PA Wire)

    Floral tributes left at the park (Dave Higgens/PA Wire)

    Anthony Hunt and his girlfriend Scarlet Hogan, who were visiting the park on Saturday, told The Telegraph that a woman with two children ‘desperately tried to pull back’ the man as he tried to get into the compound.

    “He overpowered her and jumped off. She seemed really frightened,” Hunt told the publication. “We spoke to her after and she was like, ‘I tried to pull him back’ but I guess she didn’t want to risk her own life as well.”

    Hogan added: “The man started praying to the tiger, bowing down to it – the tiger looked a bit confused.

    “Up until he got attacked, it was like he was in a trance, not in reality at all. We were just stood there, frozen.”

    One animal expert later shared a theory that the tiger did not mean to kill the man initially and that it appeared as though it was ‘playing’ with him.

    The park has confirmed that the tiger will not be euthanised (Getty Stock)

    The park has confirmed that the tiger will not be euthanised (Getty Stock)

    Park remains closed after tiger attack

    It was understood the wildlife park would reopen on Monday (12 October) after it was evacuated following the incident and remained closed on Sunday.

    But in a message sent to ticketholders on Monday morning, the park said: “Due to the serious incident that occurred at Yorkshire Wildlife Park on Saturday, the 10th of October, unfortunately the park remains closed for the whole of Monday, the 12th October.

    “Anyone with a booking for this date will be contacted within the next five working days with details of how to reschedule your booking.

    “We apologise for the late notice any inconvenience caused.”

    Police at the scene following the incident (SWNS)

    Police at the scene following the incident (SWNS)

    In a previous statement on social media, the wildlife park said people had contacted them about Altai before it was confirmed he is ‘safe and well’ and will not be euthanised following the incident.

    It added that members of park staff were ‘deeply affected’ by the incident and receiving specialist support.

    South Yorkshire Police meanwhile said it is aware of the footage of the attack online and asked people not to share it.

    A spokesperson previously said: “At 1.35pm today (Saturday 10 October) we received reports of a man entering a tiger enclosure at Yorkshire Wildlife Park. The tiger subsequently attacked the man, resulting in serious injury.

    “Emergency services attended and sadly, despite the best efforts of medical personnel, the man was pronounced dead at the scene.

    “The man’s family is aware and is being supported by specialist officers. Our thoughts are with them at this distressing time.

    “Regarding rumours surrounding the condition of the tiger, the animal was uninjured and remained in the enclosure following the incident and there is no wider risk to the public.

    “Following the incident, Yorkshire Wildlife Park was evacuated and officers remain on scene carrying out enquiries. We are aware of videos circulating online and we would encourage people not to share this footage.”

  • Here’s a Way to Predict When AI Chatbots Will Turn Bad

    Here’s a Way to Predict When AI Chatbots Will Turn Bad

    In brief

    • George Washington University physicists Neil Johnson and Frank Yingjie Huo published a formula that estimates how many good tokens an AI model produces before its first bad one.
    • In the preprint, the formula correctly predicted whether a model would tip immediately or after a delay in 15 of 16 clear-cut cases.
    • The authors propose a parallel monitor that flags when models below a safety threshold.

    Physicists at George Washington University have published a formula that estimates how many good answers an AI chatbot will give before it slips into a bad one, and early tests suggest it works.

    The study, by Neil Johnson and Frank Yingjie Huo, appeared in the journal Patterns and builds on a preprint, a version posted publicly before formal peer review, first released in February.

    Myriad: Which company will IPO next? Click to make your prediction.
    Myriad: Which company will IPO next? Click to make your prediction.

    Chatbots can answer sensibly for a long stretch and then veer into something harmful, such as bad advice on self-harm or extremist talk, and there has been no simple way to predict when the swerve will happen. The authors argue that existing safety tools often depend on a cloud connection that offline models lack.

    Johnson and Huo trace the problem to the attention head, the part of an AI model that decides which earlier words in a conversation matter most when choosing the next one. As a chat grows, the accumulated context pulls that attention toward one cluster of possible answers or another, until it tips.

    This is a common pattern exploited by many jailbreakers, and one of the reasons why mayn companies pay attention to system prompts (pieces of text the AI chatbot reads before any query). However, nobody can point out accurately how much effort is required to effectively weaken a model.

    Their formula estimates the tipping point, called n, as the number of good tokens—the word fragments a model produces one at a time—that come out before the first bad one. If the conversation already leans toward the bad side, the model tips right away, with an n of zero. If it leans good, the model delivers a run of fine answers and then flips.

    In the preprint, the formula picked the right case, immediate or delayed, in 15 of 16 clear-cut tests, or 94%. The researchers ran those tests on six open-weight models, meaning AI systems whose files are public so anyone can download and run them, from OpenAI, EleutherAI, and Meta.

    All six sat between 124 million and 410 million parameters, the adjustable numbers inside a model that serve as a rough measure of its size. The published paper reportedly widens the test to seven models of up to 12 billion parameters, which is still small by current standards.

    The target is on-device AI, the kind that runs entirely on a phone or laptop with no internet connection, including companion chatbots people talk to like a friend. Google’s experimental AI Edge Gallery app, which Decrypt tested last year, already lets an Android phone run models offline, and nothing typed into it is sent to Google’s servers, and this seems to be a trend that may grow with time as hardware becomes more powerful and smaller AI models become more capable.

    A model running offline has no cloud service checking its output, which is the gap the authors want to close. They propose a low-cost monitor that runs in parallel with the model and flags when n* falls below a safety threshold, a bit like a warning light on a car dashboard.

    BitcoinBTC · USD

    $82,777−3.64%

    Oct 5Oct 7Oct 9Oct 10Oct 12

    $86.6k$84.6k$82.7k$80.7k

    24h HighHigh$84,231

    24h LowLow$82,957

    VolVol$965.2M

    Market projectionsOdds by Myriad

    →

    They also describe ways to push the tipping point out of reach, such as injecting content into the conversation so n* lands beyond the length of the response. Alignment training, the process of teaching a model to behave, can shift or suppress tipping for specific prompts but cannot remove the underlying mechanism, the authors say.

    In April 2025, Decrypt covered an earlier paper from the same pair showing that “please” “and thank you” have a negligible effect on a model’s output, because the model treats polite words as orthogonal, or unrelated in the math, to the substance of a request. That version modeled a single, deliberately simplified attention head.

    The preprint’s tests used small models and a 300-token window, or a few short paragraphs of text, and its predictions could be off by one output.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.