Author: rb809rb

  • Ella Langley’s ‘Dandelion’ Album Returns to No. 1 Spot on Billboard 200 for First Time in Four Months, So ‘Choosin’ Texas’ Won’t Get Lonely at the Top

    Ella Langley’s ‘Dandelion’ Album Returns to No. 1 Spot on Billboard 200 for First Time in Four Months, So ‘Choosin’ Texas’ Won’t Get Lonely at the Top

    Ella Langely’s fans are choosing her “Dandelion” album as a complete piece of work, and not just staying entirely trained on her long-running “Choosin’ Texas” smash. “Dandelion” has returned to the No. 1 spot on the Billboard 200 album chart for a third non-consecutive week at the top. Its previous stay at No. 1 was contained to the first two weeks it was out, in late April , but the album has rarely been too far from the summit in the intervening four and a half months.

    With the re-ascent of “Dandelion” on the album chart, probably no one needs to be told that this means Langley is again topping both of Billboard’s primary charts, as the indomitable “Choosin’ Texas” remained at No. 1 on the most recent Hot 100 singles chart to be released. The next Hot 100 will be made public on Monday, and chances are good that “Texas” will still be on top, which would mark the song’s 22nd week at No. 1. If that turns out to be the case, Langley will have tied Mariah Carey’s all-time record of 22 weeks for “All I Want for Christmas is You” and be one week away from breaking the record.

    “Dandelion” benefited from the ongoing hunger for all things Langley, but also from a Labor Day holiday period in which there were no huge albums debuting. It reached the summit with 67,000 equivalent album units. That’s pretty much par for the recent course for Langley’s album; that figure was down just 1% from the previous week for her. But as Billboard pointed out, 67,000 was the lowest number for a No. 1 album in more than a year. (The last time an album was No. 1 with fewer units was in May 2025, when SZA’s “SOS” topped the chart with just 52,000.)

    The only new album to make the top 10 was Adela‘s first full-length alum, “Prima,” which bowed at No. 4 with 56,000. The numbers for Adela were tilted toward full-album sales, with 31,000; streaming (SEA) units were good for another 25,000 units, on the strength of 25.94 million on-demand streams. The album debuted at No. 1 on the album sales chart and No. 14 on the streaming albums chart.

    Beyoncé’s “B’Day” virtually counted as a new album, reentering the chart for the first time in 18 years due to a 20th anniversary deluxe reissue. It reentered at No. 8 with 38,000 units.

    Rounding out the top 10: Olivia Rodrigo, still riding high at No. 2 (with 64,000 units, down just 4%), followed by Morgan Wallen at No. 3, Noah Kahan at No. 5, Ariana Grande at No. 6 (up nine spots thanks to a deluxe edition with live tracks coming out), Rod Wave at No. 7 (down six spots and 57% after debuting at No. 1 a week ago), Drake at No. 9 and Olivia Dean at No. 10.

  • Is Clarity dead? A vibes-based analysis: State of Crypto

    Is Clarity dead? A vibes-based analysis: State of Crypto

    And the vibes aren’t great. A new text came out last week with changes sought by Democrats. But the key issue — ethics — remains in limbo. The cloture vote will take place seven weeks before the midterm election. As this newsletter has noted before, the issues remaining seem resolvable. The real key issue is politics, as has been the case for much of this summer. The closer lawmakers get to this election, the less likely they are to play nicely on this type of issue.

    According to industry participants this past week, the rough consensus is that anything can happen, really. There should be a vote on Tuesday, but it may get pushed if there’s a last-minute breakthrough in negotiations. There are, as of Friday afternoon, not 60 votes for the bill but negotiations are expected to stretch through the weekend and that may change.

    But overall, industry participants seem pessimistic that the bill will advance.

    The newer, growing narrative is that the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission can fill some of the regulatory gaps with rulemaking. But this too, may be fraught with risk.

    The key issue is that interest groups will almost certainly sue the agencies, regardless of what they do, and that litigation can stretch out any rulemaking process out for months. The litigation doesn’t even need to be successful — it just needs to drag out through Jan. 20, 2029, when the next president will be inaugurated.

  • Bloomberg Legend Mike McGlone Issues a Warning About Bitcoin—He Reveals the Condition That Will Save BTC

    Bloomberg Legend Mike McGlone Issues a Warning About Bitcoin—He Reveals the Condition That Will Save BTC

    Bloomberg Intelligence senior commodities strategist Mike McGlone said that high equity valuations and expectations that the Fed may raise interest rates again are creating strong sell signals for Bitcoin ($BTC).

    McGlone noted that Bitcoin’s performance over the past five years has been roughly on par with the S&P 500 index, but $BTC has experienced approximately three times higher volatility.

    McGlone described Bitcoin as an extremely volatile and speculative digital asset, noting that $BTC exhibits a high correlation with the stock market and has to compete with millions of other crypto assets. He argued that, from a risk and portfolio management perspective, Bitcoin presents a negative picture because it offers similar returns to the S&P 500 while carrying approximately three times the volatility.

    According to McGlone, Bitcoin, which emerged after the 2009 global financial crisis, could lead the market during a potential downturn, just as it did during the rise in risky assets. The analyst pointed to three key factors that increase the downside risks for Bitcoin: $BTC encountering resistance around $80,000 during its recent rise, the pricing in of approximately 70 basis points of Fed interest rate hikes over the next year in futures markets, and the S&P 500 index being at significantly higher levels compared to its 200-week moving average.

    McGlone noted that Bitcoin tends to move strongly with the S&P 500, especially during periods of decreased market risk appetite, and therefore considers $BTC a high-beta asset that follows the stock market.

    McGlone also raised a rather sharp long-term bearish scenario. According to the analyst, Bitcoin could move towards the $10,000 level, which has acted as a critical zone many times in the past. One of the key factors that could trigger such a scenario is a sustained decline of approximately 20% in the S&P 500.

    However, McGlone added that for this negative scenario to become invalid, Bitcoin needs to decouple from the stock market and consistently demonstrate strong performance. According to the analyst, $BTC’s ability to maintain its strength, especially in the face of a potential decline in the S&P 500, could support the thesis that Bitcoin is no longer just a high-beta risk asset.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Watch Out: We’re Entering a Critical Week – Lots of Economic Developments and Altcoin Events Are Coming Up – Here’s the Day-by-Day, Hour-by-Hour Schedule

    Watch Out: We’re Entering a Critical Week – Lots of Economic Developments and Altcoin Events Are Coming Up – Here’s the Day-by-Day, Hour-by-Hour Schedule

    The cryptocurrency market closed last week in the red due to the increased likelihood of a Fed interest rate hike following hawkish economic data from the US.

    After a week in which Bitcoin’s price dropped by over 3% and altcoins suffered similar losses, there are some important developments to watch in the new week.

    Here is the cryptocurrency calendar we have specially prepared for you at Bitcoinsistemi.com.

    (All times are given in UTC+3 Turkish time)

    Monday, September 14

    Ubpit will delist the STORJ and JASMY tokens.

    Spark is discontinuing its SparkLend lending protocol on the Gnosis Chain.

    The Standard Reserve, an on-chain reserve protocol, is being launched.

    Tuesday, September 15

    GHST – DAO onchain voting is starting.

    Voting on the Clarity Act begins in the US.

    Solana is rolling out Transaction V1 on its mainnet-bet network.

    Withdrawal deadline for the DeFi yield protocol Pyra.

    Wednesday, September 16

    European Blockchain Convention

    The ARC mainnet will be launched.

    VET – Interstellar will receive a mega update.

    The SEC and CFTC will release new rules.

    The Standing Committee on Finance of the Indian Parliament is holding an important session on the regulation of virtual digital assets.

    21:00 – The Fed will announce its interest rate decision.

    21:30 – FED Chairman Kevin Warsh will hold a press conference.

    Thursday, September 17

    15:30 – US Initial Jobless Claims (Expected: 209k, Previous: 206k)

    Friday, September 18

    06:00 – The Bank of Japan will announce its interest rate decision. The expectation is for a 25 basis point increase.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • FCC Chairman Brendan Carr Accuses James Talarico Of Running A “Hoax” With Jimmy Kimmel Sit-Down; YouTube Interview Nears 7 Million Views

    FCC Chairman Brendan Carr Accuses James Talarico Of Running A “Hoax” With Jimmy Kimmel Sit-Down; YouTube Interview Nears 7 Million Views

    As Jimmy Kimmel‘s interview with James Talarico nears 7 million views on YouTube, FCC chairman Brendan Carr weighed in on Saturday evening, accusing the Texas U.S. Senate candidate of orchestrating a “hoax” to drive up “clicks and donations.”

    Earlier this week, Kimmel told viewers that he would be sitting down with an interview with Talarico for his ABC late-night show, but that it would be posted to YouTube and not broadcast because of the FCC’s crackdown on its equal time rule.

    In a post on X, Carr accused Talarico of “just running the same hoax he did a few months ago on Colbert for the purpose of getting clicks and donations — he’s banking on people not understanding the statute or operating as partisan lemmings.”

    He also posted a meme of Talarico riding on a bicycle on Kimmel’s back before Kimmel puts a stick in the spokes and it crashes to the ground.

    A Talarico campaign spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Kimmel interview had drawn 6.8 million views as of Saturday evening.

    In February, Stephen Colbert posted an interview with Talarico to YouTube, telling viewers that he was warned by network executives about featuring the candidate on the broadcast. That interview generated 9.6 million views on YouTube. Like the Kimmel interview, the YouTube views were well over the average audience for the actual late-night broadcast.

    In an interview this week, Talarico characterized the Kimmel incident as government censorship and a form of “cancel culture.” He also posted the interview to X, calling it “the interview Trump’s FCC doesn’t want you to see.”

    For decades, daytime and late-night TV talk shows have operated on the assumption that they were exempt from the FCC’s equal time rule, which requires broadcasters who feature candidates to provide comparable time to their rivals, if it is requested. News coverage and news interviews have been exempt from the requirements, and the rule also does not apply cable or streaming, where the FCC’s authority is limited.

    But in January, the FCC under Carr, appointed by Donald Trump, issued guidance to broadcasters that TV talk shows actually may not be exempt, a move that critics saw as a regulatory effort to crack down on daytime and late-night hosts the president does not like. Within weeks, the agency launched an investigation of ABC’s The View after it featured Talarico as a guest.

    Until now, Carr had yet to weigh in on Kimmel’s latest criticisms and the decision to move the interview to YouTube. The late night host called the FCC’s equal time enforcement threats an effort to “make our editorial decisions for us, which of course we cannot accept.”

    On Thursday, a White House spokesperson said that Kimmel was “play acting” to “create a false narrative,” and that Carr “has not threatened him regarding interviewing James Talarico, or any other candidate.”

    Carr has denied that the FCC’s stricter enforcement of the equal time rule was an attempt to censor guests.

    On X, Carr posted, “The Equal Time statute does not prohibit anyone from interviewing anyone on broadcast tv. It is about more speech, not less. Congress wanted to ensure that voters would decide elections, not media gatekeepers picking winners and losers by providing preferential airtime to some candidates and not others. Indeed, when the statute applies, it simply requires broadcast stations to offer comparable time and placement. And comparable does not necessarily mean an interview by the same person on the same program either.”

    Carr’s comments were in response to a post from University of Texas Democrats, who noted the appearance of Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on ESPN’s College GameDay on Saturday. The group posted on X, “So I can’t watch Talarico on Kimmel but I have to watch Ted Cruz on GameDay?”

    The FCC chairman noted that the equal time rule would not apply to Cruz’s appearance because it was on a cable network and because the regulation covers only legal qualified candidates, or contenders who are in the midst of an election campaign. Cruz is not up for reelection this year; Talarico’s Republican rival is Ken Paxton.

    ABC is challenging the FCC’s enforcement of the rule when it comes to The View, pointing out that the agency affirmed its exemption from the regulation in a 2002 letter.

    The network also has sued the FCC on First Amendment grounds. It claims that the agency’s order that its eight owned stations submit to early license renewals is a form of regulatory retaliation, due to the Trump administration’s dislike of its news coverage and other content including The View and Kimmel.

    In his post, Carr again defended the FCC’s regulatory efforts as within the bounds of the agency’s authority.

    He wrote, “In exchange for that free and exclusive right to use spectrum, broadcasters made a deal with the American people. They agreed to operate, not in their own narrow interests, but in the public interest. There are various rules and policies that they must follow. This sets them apart from newspapers and cable shows and podcasts. But some broadcasters want to break their deal with the American people. They want to keep their free access to billions of dollars worth of spectrum, of course. They are less eager these days to abide by their public interest obligations.”

    ABC’s legal team has argued that the FCC is engaging in selective enforcement, as its January guidance did not target conservative talk radio, and wrote that the equal time rule is unworkable for shows like The View as it puts network stations on the hook for time to potentially dozens of candidates on the ballot. Kimmel said this week that he would love to interview Paxton, but “our affiliates in Texas would have to give equal time to as many candidates as there are on the ballot. There’s about 10 candidates on the ballot.”

  • AG Todd Blanche didn’t say predators in Epstein files wouldn’t be prosecuted

    AG Todd Blanche didn’t say predators in Epstein files wouldn’t be prosecuted

    Claim:

    U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche said, “We’re not going to prosecute the predators in the Epstein files and we’re not going to release their names to the public.”

    Rating:

    Incorrect Attribution

    In late August and early September 2026, rumors circulated that U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche once stated during a news conference that there were no plans for prosecutions or a public release of predators named in the files of Jeffrey Epstein, the late sex offender and financier. 

    Users across social media platforms and Reddit posted about the alleged quote, claiming the AG made the statement during a news conference discussing the DOJ’s investigation of Epstein and his associates. 

    According to the rumor, Blanche purportedly said, “We’re not going to prosecute the predators in the Epstein files and we’re not going to release their names to the public.”

    The rumor circulated online previously but gained renewed popularity after Blanche was confirmed as attorney general in August. 

    The quote is incorrectly attributed to Blanche. 

    It wasn’t spoken in the video clip circulating with the alleged statement, and there is no evidence he ever publicly said the words in question. Searches of Bing, DuckDuckGo, Google and Yahoo returned no relevant results from credible media outlets about such a quote, which would have been widely reported. 

    The clip accompanying the quote is from a Jan. 30, 2026, news conference in which Blanche announced the final release of files related to the DOJ’s investigation into Epstein. 

    Snopes reached out to Blanche for further comment on this claim and will update this article if we hear back. 

    It’s unclear whether the falsely attributed quote was intentionally misleading or a botched attempt to summarize Blanche’s comments. A full viewing of the news conference and reading of its transcript showed no statement matching that shared in the claim. 

    At the 21:07 mark of the video, viewable on C-SPAN, Blanche responded to a reporter’s question about whether the men in the Epstein files accused of abusing women would be prosecuted and have their names made public. 

    Blanche responded:

    If we had information, we meaning the Department of Justice, about men who abused women, we would prosecute them.

    […]

    There is this built-in assumption that somehow there is a hidden tranche of information of men that we know about that we’re covering up or that we’re choosing not to prosecute. That is not the case. I do not know whether there are men out there who abused these women. If we learn about information and evidence that allows us to prosecute them, you better believe we will. But I do not think that the public, or you all [reporters], are going to uncover men within the Epstein files that abused women, unfortunately.

    Whether what he said is true or false is open to speculation. Still, it’s evident that Blanche did not directly state, “We’re not going to prosecute the predators in the Epstein files and we’re not going to release their names to the public.” 

    Users sharing the alleged quote appeared to be attempting to twist Blanche’s intended meaning into a declarative statement that he never actually made. 

    Further, Blanche began the Jan. 30 news conference with a statement about the variety of sex criminals he said the DOJ had prosecuted in the last year. 

    Every single day of the year, the Department of Justice investigates and prosecutes those who abuse and traffic young women and children. Just last year, the FBI located over 2,700 victims of child exploitation. The Department of Justice found and terminated 3.8 million dark web pedophile accounts. In August, we charged 11 defendants for extensive sex trafficking of illegal immigrants and underaged women. Last month we charged five men who were engaged in a sadistic sex extortion network of young men abusing women. Over the past several months last summer and into the fall, we executed Operation Restore Justice, rescuing 205 child victims and arresting 293 offenders.

    Blanche added that he wanted to point these numbers out specifically because of accusations that the DOJ “does not take child exploitation or sex trafficking seriously.”

    Blanche echoed similar sentiments in an interview with ABC News published on Feb. 1, 2026, in which he said, “We have nothing to hide. We never did, and our doors are open if they want to come and review any of the materials that we produced.”

  • ‘Misty Green’ Review: Rosalind Eleazar Is a Revelation in Chris Rock’s Sharply Observed Love-Hate Portrait of the Hollywood Hustle 

    ‘Misty Green’ Review: Rosalind Eleazar Is a Revelation in Chris Rock’s Sharply Observed Love-Hate Portrait of the Hollywood Hustle 

    The title characer in Chris Rock’s sure-footed fourth feature as director, Misty Green, is having a rough week. An actress still best known for a TV series that ended years back, she’s about to be evicted, her bipolar brother is fresh out of a psych ward and in need of both emotional and financial support, a pimpy former colleague dangles a lucrative sex-work gig, and while her undeniable gifts might very well help her book an acting job, the many axes she has to grind in the entertainment industry keep getting in the way.

    In a star-making performance, Rosalind Eleazar — best known as the tough MI5 operative grieving for her partner on Slow Horses — bites into this gift of a role with grit, tenacity and zero-fucks-given scrappiness. It’s a revelatory turn in a sensitively observed drama that depicts Los Angeles as both a shimmering beacon of fame and success and a soul-sucking grind of constant rejection, where disparities of race, class and gender are as much an obstacle as that casting director who seems to hate you. Following its premieres at the Toronto and New York film festivals, A24 will release the movie Oct. 9.

    Misty Green

    The Bottom Line

    Simultaneously breezy and steeped in melancholy.

    Venue: Toronto International Film Festival (Gala Presentations)
    Release date: Friday, Oct. 9
    Cast: Rosalind Eleazar, Adam Driver, Daniel Kaluuya, Anna Kendrick, Chris Rock, Topher Grace, Alexandra Shipp, Amy Landecker, Tracie Thoms, Necar Zadegan, Rich Sommer
    Director-screenwriter: Chris Rock

    Rated R,
    1 hour 44 minutes

    Coming 12 years after Rock’s last feature as writer-director, Top Five, a highly entertaining account of the quest to be taken seriously of a standup comic with a history of substance abuse issues, Misty Green is both an extension of certain themes explored in the 2014 film and a departure. While Andre Allen, Rock’s character in the earlier movie, had a fear of not being funny when sober, Eleazar’s Misty is more of a dabbler than an addict. But her problems with impulse control make it hard for her to say no to a night of hard partying, which tends to mess with her professional obligations.

    The biggest difference, however, is that Misty Green is a significantly more mellow and thoughtful movie, the work of a mature director who knows what he wants to say and has full command of the tone of voice in which to say it. The film is frequently funny, but Rock and his actors never push for comedy. The wry humor is undergirded by melancholy, darkness, despair — by an awareness that even when you appear to have made it in Hollywood, maintaining that perch on the success ladder is not a given. Talent alone often is not enough.

    Misty appears to have been floundering for years, bristling every time some young up-and-comer tells her how much their mom and dad loved her in her Emmy-winning role on a show called Red Eye. She’s handed a deadline to pull herself out of her rut when Celine (Amy Landecker, hilariously caustic) bursts in unannounced to kick Misty out of her late husband’s apartment. Dazed and hungover, Misty protests that Celine’s husband gave her the apartment, but the unmerry widow is not buying it, giving her a week to find new digs. The industry town’s monomania makes it seem almost normal when Celine starts running audition lines with her before begrudgingly agreeing to the seven-day grace period.

    With no money and no friends or exes willing to help her out, Misty needs to book a role, pronto. But given her abrasive reputation — she was once fired off a film for punching the wardrobe woman in the face — that’s not easy. 

    Things are further complicated by the reappearance of her loose-cannon brother Jay (Daniel Kaluuya), released from a psych ward but still only tenuously in control of his mental health. Her occasional hook-up, the slick and insincere Zach (Adam Driver), tempts her out on the town the night before an important audition, offering her a chance at big money if she’s willing to put aside her moral qualms and be part of the “entertainment” for a frisky emir at a lavish party in Dubai. Driver has often been fearless about playing unlikable characters, but Zach takes him to new lows of douchiness when he’s tossing Birkin bags, jewels and cash to a screaming crowd of paid models.

    Her least complicated relationship is with straight-talking bestie Naomi (Anna Kendrick), with whom she works out at a gym near the Santa Monica Pier. Naomi serves as a sounding board and support system for Misty’s anxieties. That’s more than she gets from her agent Randy (Topher Grace), who throws up his hands in defeat after another abortive audition, telling her, “No one wants to work with you. You’re too difficult!”

    While this is very much an ensemble piece, with a bright constellation around Eleazar’s blazing supernova, Rock gives himself a choice suporting role as the one person in the industry who might not have given up on Misty. Jordan is a director who was forced to fire Misty some years back for her anger issues. He’s now staying in her apartment building while holding auditions for a Dreamgirls remake, and while he’s wary about working with the volatile Misty again, he doesn’t rule it out.

    That remains true even after she gets high with Zach while on an impromtpu date with Jordan, getting them both banged up in a car accident. She goes back to her apartment — where the eviction clock keeps ticking — and tips her stash of booze and pills down the drain, probably not for the first time, but maybe the last? 

    Jordan often gets to channel classic Rock humor (“All civil rights movies suck, you wanna know how I know? Because white people like them!”), but the character is also notable for his sensitivity, even soulfulness. Jordan is an industry veteran with genuine empathy for people like Misty, coughed up and spat out while trying to sustain a career in the face of endless closed doors. The chemistry of Eleazar’s scenes with Rock is sublime.

    Eleazar’s layered, brittle but also vulnerable performance makes Misty’s depths as a performer apparent, notably in two songs. She sings with moving expressiveness on a torchy version of “One Night Only” in her Dreamgirls audition and a stunningly heartfelt take on Radiohead’s “Creep,” in a Hollywood Roosevelt lounge bar gig.

    Naturally, her propensity for self-sabotage means her path is one step forward, two steps back, through no fault of her own when Jay loses his cool after being pulled over twice by the same Black cop (Anthony Anderson, one of a handful of cameos) in both cases with no cause beyond racial profiling. When Jay lands in prison, the fiercely protective Misty feels obligated to come up with his exorbitant bail, prompting desperate choices that nudge her career goals aside.

    Throughout all this, Eleazar keeps us firmly in Misty’s corner in a bold performance that simultaneously pushes the audience away while pulling us in. The tenderness with which Rock has built this vehicle around character, actress and a milieu he clearly knows intimately imbue the material with an aching depth of feeling that stayed with me for days.

    Misty Green is a poignant snapshot of one woman sweating on the showbiz treadmill, in a town where glittering dreams, crushing defeat and emergency compromise solutions often walk in tandem — the latter echoed in constant local crime news reports heard on car radios. Misty’s personality flaws are what make her so captivating in a smart, refreshingly understated movie that’s very much an insider’s view — jaded, but also clear-eyed — and a credit especially to Rock and Eleazar.

  • Toronto Awards Analysis: ‘I Play Rocky’ Channels Namesake, Could Follow in Its Oscar Footsteps

    Toronto Awards Analysis: ‘I Play Rocky’ Channels Namesake, Could Follow in Its Oscar Footsteps

    Sometimes, history repeats itself.

    Exactly a half-century ago, in the year of the American bicentennial, a low-profile film — the story of a small-time boxer who, against all odds, went the distance against the champ — became a gigantic hit and ended up vanquishing the likes of All the President’s Men, Network and Taxi Driver to win the best picture Oscar. That film was John G. Avildsen’s Rocky, which was written by and starred Sylvester Stallone.

    Eight years ago, another film with a low-profile premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival, where it polarized critics but played through the roof with festivalgoers and ended up winning the TIFF audience award en route to several Oscar nominations, including one for best picture, which it ultimately won. That film was Peter Farrelly’s Green Book.

    On Saturday night, Farrelly returned to TIFF for the world premiere of I Play Rocky, a film about the inspiration for and making of Rocky. Like Green Book, it polarized critics, but delighted festivalgoers — indeed, it generated numerous instances of mid-film applause, as well as a lengthy standing ovation at the end — and it will probably follow in the footsteps of Rocky and Green Book to a best picture Oscar nom, if not a win.

    If nothing else, I Play Rocky will catapult its little-known star, Anthony Ippolito, who plays Stallone, into the thick of a crowded best actor Oscar race. The 27-year-old eerily channels Sly’s unconventional but iconic appearance and manner of speaking, and, as was the case with Stallone 50 years ago, the story of his path to his career-changing part will have many rooting for him as much as the character he plays.

    Anthony Ippolito as Sylvester Stallone in ‘I Play Rocky’

    Claire Folger/Amazon MGM Studios

    The biggest hazard for I Play Rocky, which Amazon/MGM is set to begin rolling out in the U.S. on Nov. 6, is Stallone himself.

    In THR’s TIFF lounge, Ippolito said he had spoken with Stallone before playing him and Farrelly said he had shown Stallone the finished film and Stallone was pleased with it. And during remarks from the TIFF stage just before the film unspooled, Farrelly gave a shout out to Stallone.

    But Stallone was not directly involved with — nor does it seems he will financially benefit from — I Play Rocky. And if the recent past is any indication, he believes he deserves a cut of anything Rocky-related: indeed, in 2022, he publicly blasted Irwin Winkler, one of the two producers of the original Rocky, who helped to give him his big break, for not giving him an equity stake in the franchise.

    Winkler and the other producer, Robert Chartoff, who died in 2015, are both portrayed in the film (by P.J. Byrne and Toby Kebbell, respectively) rather sympathetically. The real Winkler, now 95, also makes a cameo in it. And Chartoff’s widow was at the premiere. In other words, it seems that the Winklers and Chartoffs are happy with the film.

    If Stallone, who turned 80 in July, were to publicly lash out against I Play Rocky, that could really harm its Oscar prospects. But if he were to publicly champion it, that could really help them. And to be honest, he has a lot of reason to be happy about the film: written by Peter Gamble, it is essentially a celebration of his smarts, tenacity and talent — plus, it basically prints the legend about the origin of Rocky that Stallone has been repeating for the past half-century, not all of which stands up to close scrutiny.

    In addition to Gamble’s script and Ippolito’s star turn, other strong work in the film is done by supporting performers AnnaSophia Robb (as Stallone’s first wife), Tracy Letters (as the head of United Artists) and Jay Duplass (as Avildsen); cinematographer Sean Porter (who also shot Green Book); production designer Anthony Gasparro; makeup artist Jackie Risotto; and hairstylist Nakoya Yancey.

  • FCC Chairman Slams James Talarico as Running a ‘Hoax’ With Jimmy Kimmel Interview, Which ABC Punted to YouTube, to Get ‘Clicks and Donations’

    FCC Chairman Slams James Talarico as Running a ‘Hoax’ With Jimmy Kimmel Interview, Which ABC Punted to YouTube, to Get ‘Clicks and Donations’

    Brendan Carr, the Trump-aligned Republican chairman of the FCC, accused James Talarico, a Texas Democrat running for the U.S. Senate, of running a “hoax” to garner attention and campaign donations by sitting for an interview with Jimmy Kimmel — which ABC put on YouTube instead airing it on broadcast TV to avoid a potential clash with the FCC.

    In a post on X Saturday night, Carr wrote that Talarico is “just running the same hoax he did a few months ago on Colbert for the purpose of getting clicks and donations — he’s banking on people not understanding the statute or operating as partisan lemmings.”

    Carr’s post included a meme mocking Talarico and Kimmel meant to show a self-inflicted fail. It depicts Kimmel riding a bike with Talarico tucked into a baby backpack carrier on the TV host’s shoulders; Kimmel then inserts a stick into the spokes, causing the bike to crash.

    Variety has reached out to Talarico’s press office for comment.

    Kimmel on Wednesday announced on his ABC late-night show that the interview Talarico would be on YouTube and not TV, saying the decision was made “out of consideration for our local stations, especially our ABC affiliates in Texas who would have to deal with this nonsense.”

    The concern was that the FCC would retaliate against ABC over Talarico’s appearance under the agency’s equal-time rule, which requires broadcast programs give equivalent airtime to political candidates (unless they are “bona fide” news programs). Late-night shows and daytime talk shows have long been considered exempt from the rule. But earlier this year, Carr kicked off a formal review of whether ABC daytime talk show “The View” qualifies for an exemption to the equal-time rule. The FCC chairman has alleged that many talk shows on broadcast networks function as partisan mouthpieces for Democrats and should be subject to agency regulations like the equal-time rule and a prohibition on “news distortion,” because they are using publicly licensed TV spectrum.

    Talarico characterized ABC’s decision to abstain from putting his interview with Kimmel on TV as effectively amounting to censorship by the U.S. government. “Government censorship should be a concern to all of us, regardless of our political party,” Talarico said in an interview Thursday on MS NOW. The Democrat called the FCC’s threats against broadcasters over “The View” and other programming “the most dangerous form of cancel culture.”

    After Kimmel’s interview with Talarico was posted Thursday on YouTube, it notched over 5 million views in the first 24 hours. As of this writing, it has racked up 7.3 million views on the platform.

    “We are being targeted by the FCC for the crime of interviewing political candidates,” Kimmel said at the top of the segment. “Even though, for years, we and every other late-night talk show have welcomed numerous candidates including Donald Trump when he was running [for president]. He was on this show two times. But now I guess he doesn’t like me anymore or the First Amendment. And so the FCC has threatened me or threatened my show, our network, even our local ABC stations because they want to make our editorial decisions for us, which of course we cannot accept. And so tonight, we are bypassing the public airwaves and hosting this interview on YouTube, even though our government would clearly prefer that we not do it at all.”

    Earlier this year, Talarico similarly was kept off TV over CBS’s fear of running afoul of Carr’s enforcement of the FCC equal time rule. In February, Stephen Colbert said CBS execs pulled his interview with Talarico from air over concerns about violating the equal time rule. CBS said it didn’t block the interview from airing but that the network provided “The Late Show” producers “legal guidance that the broadcast could trigger the FCC equal-time rule.”

    Meanwhile, ABC has dragged the FCC into federal court over the agency’s demand it submit licenses for its eight owned-and-operated TV stations early renewal. ABC sued the FCC and Carr last month, alleging the commission was waging an “extraordinary assault” on its First Amendment rights through the implicit threat of revoking its local TV broadcast. The Disney-owned broadcaster’s lawsuit alleged that the FCC’s “true target” is not the stations’ employment practices but the content of their programming: “Because the Commission cannot regulate that content directly, it has used its review of the Stations’ licenses as an instrument to the same end,” the suit said. The FCC asserts the ABC early license renewal was initiated from the agency’s investigation into “allegations of unlawful discrimination” in employment practices at Disney and ABC. On Sept. 3, the agency asked the court to dismiss ABC’s lawsuit, arguing that the network failed to establish that the license review represents “retaliation” for disfavored speech.

    Carr, in his Saturday-night commentary, was responding to a comment on X by an organization called University Democrats at UT Austin, which asked rhetorically, “So I can’t watch Talarico on Kimmel but I have to watch Ted Cruz on GameDay?” That’s a reference to an appearance on ESPN’s “College GameDay” Saturday by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who was on-air for almost 10 minutes. Cruz, who spent most of his time on the program lobbying for the Protect College Sports Act legislation that would impose new restrictions on collegiate sports practices, was loudly heckled and booed by the fans in attendance.

    Carr, who was appointed chairman of the FCC by Donald Trump in 2025, noted that the FCC’s equal-time rule doesn’t apply to ESPN’s “College GameDay” because Congress applied it to broadcast TV stations, not cable networks. In addition, he pointed out correctly, the statute only applies to “legally qualified candidates” running for office.

    He also argued that the equal-time statute “does not prohibit anyone from interviewing anyone on broadcast tv. It is about more speech, not less. Congress wanted to ensure that voters would decide elections, not media gatekeepers picking winners and losers by providing preferential airtime to some candidates and not others.”

    Carr, explaining why broadcast and cable networks are regulated differently by the FCC, continued, “Broadcasters are unique. The FCC gave them free licenses worth many billions of dollars to use a public resource (spectrum). They are given a government sanctioned monopoly on their broadcast frequencies, too. If anyone else wants to use that same public resource (spectrum) for the purpose of expressing their own views, the government will not let them — it will eject anyone else that tries to use a broadcaster’s licensed spectrum.”

    The Supreme Court has ruled that “holding broadcasters to their public interest obligations is not censorship or any sort of 1A [First Amendment] violation,” Carr wrote. “And Congress has charged the FCC with ensuring that broadcasters meet those public interest obligations, as required by their licenses. The agency should do so.”

    Of course, today, most Americans watch broadcast television networks like ABC on cable, satellite or internet pay-TV services — not using over-the-air antennas.

    In response to Carr’s 479-word post, UT Austin’s University Democrats wrote, “ok brandon.”

  • Morgan Stanley’s $50.6M BTC buying shields market – But rally to $82K has THIS hurdle

    Morgan Stanley’s $50.6M BTC buying shields market – But rally to $82K has THIS hurdle

    The institutional demand around Bitcoin strengthened as Morgan Stanley expanded MSBT holdings while ETF inflows remained positive.

    Reportedly, Morgan Stanley’s MSBT Bitcoin ETF received another 51.58 $BTC, valued at around $4 million, from Coinbase Prime.

    Notably, the latest transaction followed a series of transfers into the fund for the previous two weeks. Across these transfers, MSBT has now received a total of 641.87 $BTC, worth roughly $50.6 million.

    Therefore, Morgan Stanley’s persistent accumulation enhanced Bitcoin’s institutional demand narrative as its price consolidated after a rapid expansion.

    Importantly, the transfers showed several additions across the two-week period, rather than reflecting a single large transaction. The pattern became particularly notable as Bitcoin remained beneath its recent $82,000 resistance.

    Therefore, the institutional accumulation continued while Bitcoin consolidated, potentially supporting demand around its current price structure.

    ETF inflows broaden the demand picture

    Beyond Morgan Stanley, the broader Bitcoin spot ETF flows also remained positive during the most recent reporting period.

    Specifically, Bitcoin spot ETFs registered $6 million in daily total net inflows, equivalent to roughly 78.39 $BTC. Meanwhile, the cumulative net inflows reached nearly $55.63 billion, representing around 695,820 $BTC tokens.

    These positive flows implied that institutional demand extended beyond Morgan Stanley’s recent accumulation.

    The daily figure, however, remained relatively modest compared with the total cumulative ETF inflow.

    Even so, the positive flows complemented MSBT’s accumulation, thus strengthening the broader demand outlook around Bitcoin.

    Therefore persistent ETF inflows could provide additional buying support in case Bitcoin continues defending its current demand area.

    Source: CoinGlass

    Persistent outflows keep exchange supply restrained

    Additionally, exchange activity provided another supportive element, as Bitcoin Spot Netflows remained predominantly negative across the displayed period.

    Notably, the most recent reading registered a netflow of -$6.66 million on September 12, continuing the broader pattern of frequent spot outflows.

    The negative netflow figure suggested that withdrawals exceeded deposits, rather than representing the actual volume withdrawn from exchanges.

    Therefore, the continued negative netflows indicated that more $BTC generally left exchanges than entered them during those sessions.

    Consequently, this trend limited the immediate supply pressure as the institutional players continued accumulating Bitcoin.

    Eventually, sustained negative netflows could tighten the supply conditions further if the institutional demand remain positive.

    Source: CoinGlass

    Can Bitcoin turn its order block higher?

    At the time of reporting, Bitcoin traded near $77,257 after retreating from the $82,000 resistance area and returning toward its daily order block.

    On the 24-hour charts, $BTC price continued holding above the $76,500 support, keeping the demand structure intact despite the recent price pullback.

    Furthermore, the RSI indicator provided additional context after cooling rapidly from its earlier overbought conditions. The indicator’s latest reading stood at 55.02, while the RSI average signal remained higher at 63.71.

    Despite the fact that the buying strength had cooled, the RSI indicator still stayed above the neutral 50 level as $BTC defended the order block.

    A decisive defense of the $76,500 support could encourage another recovery toward $82,000, especially if institutional demand persists.

    Alternatively, a loss of that support would weaken the structure and increase the probability of a deeper price correction.

    Source: TradingView

    Final Summary

    • Persistent spot outflows reduced exchange supply as institutional Bitcoin accumulation continued.
    • $BTC held its order block, keeping $82,000 firmly in focus for recovery.