Tag: CRYPTOS FoxBusiness

  • Polygon Burns 100M POL Tokens, Removing 1% of Total Supply

    Polygon Burns 100M POL Tokens, Removing 1% of Total Supply

    • Polygon permanently removed 100 million $POL tokens with an estimated valuation of $10.12 million.
    • The liquidated volume equates to approximately 1% of the asset’s total issued supply.
    • The transaction utilized funds accumulated within the network’s fee-collector contract, which held nearly 121 million $POL.

    Polygon burned 100M $POL tokens this Wednesday via a direct transaction on its blockchain. The Executive Director of the Polygon Foundation, Sandeep Nailwal, confirmed the execution in a post on his X account.

    BURN COMPLETE: 100 MILLION $POL (~1% of $POL total supply) IS OFFICIALLY BURNED PERMANENTLY.https://t.co/3MOAw9eD8o pic.twitter.com/incm4389Df

    — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 23, 2026

    The transfer originated from an address marked with the contractual suffix «0xDEAD» and was routed to the core $POL token contract. Through this technical procedure, the assets were rendered entirely irrecoverable for any future secondary market circulation.

    The source of the funds did not involve the foundation’s operational budget or institutional treasury reserves. Instead, the capital stemmed from the steady accumulation of gas generated by network users over recent months.

    According to a technical report from crypto exchange KuCoin, processing fees on Polygon split into two specific components upon transaction validation: a priority fee and a mandatory base fee.

    Validators responsible for block production receive priority fees as an incentive for their computational work. Conversely, base fees are automatically redirected to a collector smart contract designed to aggregate network surpluses.

    Prior to this operation, the collection module held approximately 121 million units of $POL. With the transaction executed on September 23, 2026, the system consumed the vast majority of that accumulated reserve.

    Technical mechanics of the EIP-1559 framework and community execution

    Polygon’s technical infrastructure has operated under a model similar to the EIP-1559 improvement proposal since January 2022. Official protocol documentation notes that this mechanism aims to establish a direct, predictable correlation between actual network activity and the systematic reduction of tokens in circulation.

    The key innovation within this deployment lies in the functional decentralization of future burns. Contract parameters allow any community participant to trigger the burn function once contract balances reach protocol-approved thresholds.

    Under this framework, supply reductions are expected to occur on a roughly quarterly cadence. According to details shared by Polygon developers, the actual pace of these burns will depend strictly on the volume of transactions paying base fees across the ecosystem.

    The secondary market did not immediately reflect the supply contraction. As of 7:34 a.m. UTC on September 23, 2026, the $POL token traded at $0.1014 following a 6.46% decline over a 24-hour window, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

    Over the seven-day period preceding the transaction, the asset maintained a 10% gain. Total market capitalization stood at $1.07 billion, while 24-hour trading volume surged 77% to reach $228.83 million on the day.

    Market commentary suggests that price absorption following supply reduction events tends to unfold gradually due to broader market liquidity dynamics.

    The next evaluation cycle for automated $POL token burns will depend on the balance reported by the network’s collector contract at the close of the fourth quarter of 2026.

  • Circle launches 24/7 stablecoin FX engine as it chases a slice of the $10 trillion currency market

    Circle launches 24/7 stablecoin FX engine as it chases a slice of the $10 trillion currency market

    Circle has switched on 24-hour stablecoin foreign-exchange settlement on Arc, targeting a global FX market that moves nearly $10 trillion daily.

    The service, called StableFX, allows screened businesses to request competing quotes from multiple liquidity providers and settle both sides of a stablecoin currency trade simultaneously on Circle’s newly launched blockchain. Users can choose near-instant settlement or defer completion to an agreed window, extending institutional FX activity beyond conventional banking hours.

    Circle said much of the global currency market still relies on infrastructure designed around banking schedules even as payments, crypto trading and digital commerce increasingly operate continuously. StableFX is its attempt to move part of that market onto programmable settlement rails.

    The system separates trade execution from settlement. Businesses submit a currency pair, amount, and preferred settlement window through a request-for-quote process, allowing approved liquidity providers to compete for the order. Execution happens off-chain before counterparties fund a smart-contract escrow on Arc.

    Settlement then occurs on a payment-versus-payment basis: both stablecoin legs transfer together, or neither does. That structure is designed to reduce settlement risk while allowing businesses to contract with Circle once and access multiple vetted counterparties through the same venue.

    Circle Chief Executive Jeremy Allaire described StableFX as a “strong emerging primitive” for atomically settled, real-time onchain foreign exchange, pointing to the stablecoin issuers and market participants being assembled around the service.

    Arc pushes beyond payments into institutional FX infrastructure

    The launch gives Arc an immediate institutional use case less than a week after Circle brought the blockchain to mainnet on Sept. 16.

    Circle’s developer documentation currently names $USDC and euro-denominated $EURC, including an example of an exchange between the two tokens. Circle has said it will add additional local stablecoin pairs, though it has not published a complete list of pairs already available for live StableFX trading.

    That distinction could determine how quickly the service expands beyond dollar-euro transactions. Circle listed a wider group of stablecoins as active or onboarding to Arc at mainnet launch, but blockchain participation does not automatically make each token available through StableFX.

    Access is also restricted. Circle screens counterparties and limits StableFX to eligible incorporated businesses, positioning the service for payment companies, financial institutions and corporate treasury desks rather than retail traders.

    For those firms, the attraction is partly operational. A payments company needing to rebalance stablecoin liquidity across currencies could execute the trade overnight or during a weekend rather than wait for traditional banking rails to reopen. Deferred settlement also gives treasury teams flexibility to match execution with their funding schedules.

    The harder part begins after settlement.

    StableFX exchanges digital currencies but does not automatically turn a local-currency stablecoin into cash in a recipient’s bank account. Firms using partner-issued stablecoins still need arrangements with their issuers for deposits and redemptions, suitable custody, and local payout infrastructure.

    Circle Mint can provide $USDC and $EURC liquidity and fiat conversion in supported markets, but that access does not extend automatically to tokens issued by other companies.

  • Token Burns Continue in Popular Altcoin! Here’s the Latest Token Amount Burned

    Polygon Foundation CEO Sandeep Nailwal announced a significant supply development for $POL, the native token of the Polygon ecosystem. According to Nailwal’s statement dated September 24th, a total of 100 million $POL tokens have been permanently withdrawn from circulation.

    Nailwal stated in a social media post that 100 million POLs were “permanently incinerated.” This amount reportedly represents approximately 1% of the total $POL supply.

    Token burning means permanently removing a certain amount of cryptocurrency from circulation by sending it to an inaccessible address. After this process, the burned tokens cannot be reused or reintroduced into the market. This change in the $POL supply directly impacts the total number of tokens in the Polygon ecosystem.

    The announcement by the Polygon Foundation is being closely watched, particularly in terms of the token economy and circulating supply. Burning 100 million $POL tokens means that approximately 1% of the total supply has been permanently removed from the system.

    Sandeep Nailwal did not provide additional details in his post regarding the reasons for the token burn or the potential impact of the operation on Polygon’s future token economy. The statement also did not include any information about a new supply arrangement for $POL following the burn.

    $POL stands out as the native token used for network activities and various transactions within the Polygon ecosystem. Supply changes in Polygon’s token structure are significant for the ecosystem’s economic model.

    With the permanent burning of 100 million $POL tokens, approximately 1% of the token supply has been removed from circulation. However, Nailwal’s statement did not include any assessment of the impact of this development on $POL’s market price or investor behavior.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • SEC’s Uyeda Says Dropping Crypto Cases Helps Protect Agency Credibility

    SEC’s Uyeda Says Dropping Crypto Cases Helps Protect Agency Credibility

    SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda said the agency dropped some crypto lawsuits partly to protect its credibility, arguing that regulators should not defend legal positions they expect to abandon.

    Speaking on Sept. 23, Uyeda said continuing to defend those positions in court could weaken confidence in the agency if its legal interpretation later changes. His comments were reported by Eleanor Terrett, host of the U.S. podcast Crypto in America.

    🚨NEW: SEC Commissioner @MarkUyedaUS says the agency dropped several crypto cases inherited from the prior administration because continuing to defend legal interpretations it was preparing to reverse would have “hurt the SEC’s credibility.”

    “I’m not about to have our… pic.twitter.com/FjsYE1ICbE

    — Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) September 23, 2026

    SEC Moves Toward Rulemaking

    Uyeda described the change as a “180-degree shift” in how the SEC handles crypto-related legal questions. He has previously criticized the agency’s reliance on enforcement actions, arguing that clearer rules should address issues affecting the industry.

    Related: Ripple’s David Schwartz Links SEC Experience to Glock’s Connecticut Lawsuit

    The SEC has recently moved toward rulemaking and temporary regulatory relief for parts of the crypto market.

    Innovation Exemption Tests Tokenized Stocks

    Uyeda described the SEC’s Innovation Exemption as “a kind of pilot.” The temporary framework allows certain onchain venues to trade tokenized U.S. stocks under specific conditions.

    The SEC said the exemption will allow the agency to observe how these markets operate while considering longer-term rules. The commission has also requested public feedback on the framework.

    Related: Russia to Let Market Shape Crypto Rules as Licensing Deadline Nears

  • Uniswap rallies 15% – How Spot demand could fuel UNI’s $11 breakout

    Uniswap rallies 15% – How Spot demand could fuel UNI’s $11 breakout

    Uniswap’s [$UNI] price rallied 15.17% at press time, after CME revealed plans for regulated Futures, as the surging spot activity strengthened the catalyst-driven advance.

    On the 22nd of September, CME Group announced the planned Futures activity, which will launch on the 19th of October, subject to regulatory approvals.

    This announcement gave $UNI exposure to another regulated derivatives venue as market participants reacted ahead of the scheduled launch. Trading activity around the token also expanded rapidly following the catalyst, with the spot volume jumping 72.33% to $2.14 billion.

    Spot buyers keep control of the rally

    After the announcement triggered huge market participation, the spot positioning also offered stronger support for $UNI.

    In particular, the Spot Taker CVD metric preserved buyer dominance, implying the aggressive bulls continued taking available liquidity from bears.

    The Futures traders, meanwhile, became less resistant to the advance. The Futures Taker CVD shifted from seller dominance to neutral positioning as derivatives selling eased.

    More importantly, the Futures buyers had not taken control yet, but rather sellers simply lost their earlier dominance. Therefore, the spot buyers remained the clearer driving element behind $UNI’s price expansion.

    Eventually, in case the futures positioning shifts towards buyers, the derivatives demand could provide another layer of support. The persistent neutrality, however, would leave spot traders carrying more responsibility for extending the price recovery.

    Uniswap Spot Taker CVD on CryptoQuant

    Whales remain active near the barrier

    Notably, larger market participants also maintained a significant edge over the retail traders as the $UNI price pushed towards its key weekly resistance.

    Specifically, the Whale versus Retail Delta had registered 0.192 at press time, keeping the reading in positive territory. The positive delta implied that whale activity remained stronger relative to the retail activity during the recent price increase.

    Also notably, the on-chain activity strengthened this whale trend, as two wallets accumulated substantial $UNI positions during the rally.

    According to Lookonchain, one newly created wallet bought 269,477 $UNI valued around $2.84 million, while another acquired 138,442 $UNI worth of $1.23 million. The wallets accumulated a total of roughly 407,919 $UNI worth $4.07 million.

    However, the reading remained below several stronger peaks visible earlier in the year. The prevailing whale participation, therefore, did not match the most aggressive periods shown across the indicator’s recent history.

    The combination remained supportive since the spot takers also favored buyers during the latest price advance.

    Uniswap now faces a different challenge as the price approaches a historically important supply area.

    $UNI Whale vs. Retail Delta on CoinGlass

    Can $UNI turn $11-resistance into support?

    During its price uptrend, $UNI reached approximately $10.43 after its impulse from its lower range, reclaiming the major $6 price level.

    Notably, this price rally placed $UNI directly below the weekly $11 area, where previous rallies encountered substantial rejection.

    Also noteworthy, the Uniswap price had last tested this region during the late-2025 period before sellers forced the price sharply lower.

    However, the current price structure carried a strong technical pressure as the weekly RSI climbed to 75.98 as of writing, pushing firmly into the overbought territory. Even so, an overbought reading alone would not confirm an immediate price rejection while buyers remained aggressive.

    The expanding MACD structure instead supported the strength behind $UNI’s push towards its major resistance. In particular, the MACD line at 1.020 sat comfortably above its signal line at 0.254.

    $UNI/USDT Weekly Chart on TradingView

    Overall, a sustained weekly breakout above the $11-resistance could shift attention toward the next major resistance around $15. Another rejection, however, could expose $UNI‘s rally to a broader retracement after its sharp price advance.

    Final Summary

    • CME futures plans strengthened $UNI’s rally as spot buyers maintained control of market activity.
    • Fading futures selling and positive whale activity strengthened $UNI’s attempt to clear $11.
  • Ex-SEC acting chair: Agency dropped crypto cases to avoid issues with credibility

    Ex-SEC acting chair: Agency dropped crypto cases to avoid issues with credibility

    Mark Uyeda, who served as acting chair of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) before Paul Atkins’s confirmation, said the agency dropped civil cases against cryptocurrency companies filed under the previous administration because it was preparing a “180-degree change” in rulemaking.

    In a Wednesday panel at the Psaros Center for Financial Markets and Policy’s Financial Markets Quality Conference, Uyeda said the SEC dropped cases involving crypto companies in early 2025 as it could have hurt the agency’s credibility in arguing positions in court contrary to its planned policy changes. Uyeda argued that there had been “significant concerns” that the cases against crypto companies were “justifiable under law.”

    “I’m not about to have our litigators, even though they’re having cases that were authorized under the prior administration, stand up in court and have a commission interpretation be issued that is a 180-degree change from what they’d been arguing for that court,” said the commissioner. “I think that hurts [our] credibility as an agency.”

    SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda. Source: Psaros Center for Financial Markets and Policy

    Under Uyeda, who was acting SEC chair from January to April 2025, the commission dropped cases filed against Kraken, Ripple Labs, Coinbase and others in what many critics characterized as payback for the industry’s support of President Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign. Trump had promised to fire former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, under whom many of the cases were filed, “on day one” if elected. Gensler resigned the day Trump took office.

    Uyeda has been a commissioner at the SEC since 2022 and currently serves at the agency’s leadership alongside Atkins and Commissioner Hester Peirce. With Peirce’s departure expected in November, the agency will have only two of its five members on its leadership panel, and Trump has not announced any nominations for potential replacements.

  • Pyth Adds Nasdaq Basic Market Data

    Pyth Adds Nasdaq Basic Market Data

    Pyth has been approved as an external distributor of Nasdaq Basic, Nasdaq’s real-time market data product for U.S. equities. The feed will be available through Pyth’s Data Marketplace, a platform for distributing financial datasets to software and blockchain-based applications. Pyth is a blockchain data network focused on market information.

    Clients using the Pyth Data Marketplace can now license Nasdaq Basic directly from Nasdaq and access the feed through Pyth. They must receive written approval from Nasdaq before using the data.

    Nasdaq Basic has been available for more than a decade and is used by brokerages, banks, fintech companies, and investing apps. Its addition to Pyth’s marketplace gives Nasdaq another way to distribute market data to applications built around software and blockchain infrastructure.

    For Pyth, the integration expands the Data Marketplace beyond its existing data products. The marketplace is designed to let institutions distribute proprietary datasets directly to applications that need them.

    Image: Magnific

  • Inside the FBI’s little-known annual crypto crime gathering

    Inside the FBI’s little-known annual crypto crime gathering

    The invitation-only symposium is capped at about 50 private-sector vendors and partners, with total attendance running into the hundreds, two of the people said. The program combines keynote speeches, panel discussions and fireside chats with networking opportunities. Companies also demonstrated their platforms in demo rooms.

    Discussions covered the illicit use of virtual assets by cartels and in terrorist financing, cyber-enabled fraud, scams, child sexual abuse material, human trafficking and violent crime, including so-called wrench attacks. Attendees also examined emerging hacks, North Korean activity and ways for industry and law enforcement to share intelligence, according to a source familiar with the event.

    Attendees range from senior FBI officials and frontline investigators to representatives of other U.S. agencies and overseas law enforcement partners.

    “This is not a crypto event,” one of the attendees said. “It is a law enforcement event for law enforcement and the people they work with.”

    The atmosphere at the Virtual Asset Technical Exchange differs markedly from industry conferences, with discussions centered on illicit finance, national security and investigations intended to produce arrests and asset seizures. Investigators discuss active threats, techniques for following funds and successful cases, the person added.

    A little-publicized gathering

    The government-funded symposium is now in its ninth year and has drawn several hundred attendees, two of the people said, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

  • The UK street with a name so rude they’ve had to secure its sign with concrete

    The UK street with a name so rude they’ve had to secure its sign with concrete

    A couple walk past a sign for Minge Lane.
    Have you ever been to Minge Lane? (Picture: Ben Gregory-Ring/PA Media Assignments)

    One of the rudest named streets in the UK needs to secure its road signs with concrete because tourists keep stealing them. 

    Minge Lane in Upton upon Severn in Worcestershire features as one of the UK’s rudest place names in a new survey. 

    It is joined by the likes of Sluts Hole Lane in Norfolk, Sandy Balls in the New Forest and Shitterton in Dorset.

    Derbyshire’s Fanny Avenue, Cocks in Cornwall and Wetwang in Yorkshire also caused a stir, according to the poll.

    Jeremy Owenson, the mayor of Upton upon Severn, said people living in Minge Lane are so proud that they host a festival named after it every summer.

    He said: ‘There is an informal festival with loads of bands and a bit of fancy dress.

    ‘People get down to the local pub and generally have a good time. It’s a fun celebration to embrace the name Minge Lane rather than worrying too much about it.’

    EDITORIAL USE ONLY Caroline West and Andy Davies??unveil the the??Minge Lane road sign from under the green velvet curtain in Worcestershire as part of an Asda Money campaign launched following research suggesting many drivers have been distracted by unusual road and place names. Issue date: Wednesday September 23, 2026. PA Photo. Photo credit should read: Ben Gregory-Ring/PA Media Assignments
    Minge Lane is found in Upton upon Severn, Worcestershire (Picture: Ben Gregory-Ring/PA Media Assignments)

    However, Mr Owenson, who is also the deputy leader of Malvern Hills District Council, said: ‘From a district council perspective, we regularly had the street name stolen.

    ‘The new names have been concreted in to make sure they can’t be taken.’

    Bell End in Rowley Regis in the West Midlands, which is also on the list of rudest place names, was the target of complaints in 2018 and residents started a petition to change it.

    They claimed children would be bullied at school and called on the local council to rename it because they had become a ‘laughing stock’.

    EDITORIAL USE ONLY General view of the??Minge Lane road sign in Worcestershire as part of an Asda Money campaign launched following research suggesting many drivers have been distracted by unusual road and place names. Issue date: Wednesday September 23, 2026. PA Photo. Photo credit should read: Ben Gregory-Ring/PA Media Assignments
    Minge Lane is proudly on the list of Britain’s rudest place names, which includes Sluts Hole Lane and Twatt (Picture: Ben Gregory-Ring/PA Media Assignments)

    The petition attracted only 100 signatures but a rival campaign – titled ‘Leave the Historic Name of Bell End Alone!’ – received more than 4,800 supporters at the time and the road name was left untouched.

    Follow Metro on WhatsApp to be the first to get all the latest news

    Apps With More Than One Million Users
    Follow us to receive the latest news updates from Metro (Picture: Getty Images)

    Metro’s on Whatsapp! Join our community for breaking news and juicy stories.

    More than half of Britons think that the UK has some of the funniest road and village names in the world, according to Asda Money’s survey. 

    They also found the cheeky names were a distraction, putting off two-thirds of drivers while six in 10 had missed their turn or exit and one in three nearly had an accident. 

    Britain’s rudest place names

    1. Sluts Hole Lane, Norfolk – 38%
    2. Butthole Lane, Leicestershire – 37%
    3. Bell End, Rowley Regis – 36%
    4. Twatt, Orkney – 35%
    5. The Knob, Northamptonshire – 33%
    6. Minge Lane, Worcestershire – 32%
    7. Sandy Balls, New Forest – 32%
    8. Cock-A-Dibby, Berkshire – 31%
    9. Slag Lane, Merseyside – 30%
    10. Fanny Avenue, Derbyshire – 29%
    11. Cocks, Cornwall – 29%
    12. Back Passage, City of London – 28%
    13. Shitterton, Dorset – 28%
    14. Titty Hill, West Sussex – 27%
    15. Fanny Hands Lane, Lincolnshire – 26%
    16. Happy Bottom, Dorset – 26%
    17. Cock Hill Lane, Birmingham – 25%
    18. Titty Ho, Northamptonshire – 25%
    19. Fingringhoe, Essex – 24%
    20. Wetwang, Yorkshire – 24%
    21. Crotch Crescent, Oxford – 23%
    22. Slack Bottom, West Yorkshire – 23%
    23. Jackass Lane, Kent – 20%
    24. Dumb Woman’s Lane, East Sussex – 20%
    25. Pratts Bottom, Greater London – 20%
    26. Great Snoring, Norfolk – 19%
    27. Twatling Road, Birmingham – 18%
    28. Fine Bush Lane, Ruislip – 17%
    29. Butt Hill Road, South Yorkshire – 17%
    30. Hornyold Road, Worcestershire – 17%
    31. Letsby Avenue, South Yorkshire – 15%
    32. Nickey Nackey Lane, Surrey – 14%
    33. North Piddle, Worcestershire – 12%
    34. Penistone, Barnsley, South Yorkshire – 10%
    35. Piddlehinton, Dorset – 7%

      Survey by Asda Money

  • As Expectations for a New Bull Run for Bitcoin (BTC) Rise, Are Things Turning Around? Bloomberg Analyst Mike McGlone Issues a Striking Warning About…

    As Expectations for a New Bull Run for Bitcoin (BTC) Rise, Are Things Turning Around? Bloomberg Analyst Mike McGlone Issues a Striking Warning About…

    Bitcoin, the leading cryptocurrency, has recently surged above $86,000, testing its highest levels in nearly eight months, prompting a noteworthy assessment from Mike McGlone, senior commodities strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence.

    Has Bitcoin Hit Bottom?

    In his assessment from the McGlone X account, he questioned whether Bitcoin’s decline to approximately $60,000 in 2026 would constitute the final bottom of the current correction.

    At this point, McGlone noted that the approximately $60,000 level Bitcoin reached earlier in the year might not be the final bottom in this cycle.

    McGlone likened Bitcoin’s price movement to the sharp decline in crude oil prices after it surpassed the $100 level in 2008. The analyst suggests that after Bitcoin makes its first monthly close above $100,000 in January 2025, it may enter a period of “high price correction” similar to the one experienced after oil exceeded $100 per barrel in 2008.

    At this point, McGlone questioned whether Bitcoin’s decline to around $60,000 in 2026 would indicate the completion of this process.

    $60,000 May Not Be the Real Bottom!

    At this point, the analyst noted that it is not yet clear whether the $60,000 level is a permanent bottom due to current macroeconomic conditions and increasing liquidity shortages. According to McGlone, Bitcoin is under pressure due to income alternatives from traditional finance.

    McGlone points out that the record-high stock market and the rise in US 10-year Treasury yields above 5% in the third quarter have created significant competition for assets like Bitcoin that do not provide income to investors.

    “With U.S. Treasury 10-year bond yields rising above 5% in the third quarter, there is increased competition for non-income assets.”

    In this context, McGlone points out that the correction Bitcoin experienced after its rise above $100,000 may not yet be complete. The analyst is cautious about whether the level around $60,000 seen in early 2026 is the ultimate bottom of this cycle for Bitcoin, given high Treasury bond yields, stock market risks, and weakening support from traditional markets, and does not rule out the possibility of a correction towards that level.

    *This is not investment advice.