Blog

  • Anne Hathaway “Pushed Really Hard” Trying to Get Julie Andrews to Return for ‘Princess Diaries 3’

    Anne Hathaway “Pushed Really Hard” Trying to Get Julie Andrews to Return for ‘Princess Diaries 3’

    Anne Hathaway is revealing that she “did push really hard” trying to get Julie Andrews to reprise her role as Queen Clarisse Renaldi in the upcoming third Princess Diaries installment.

    During a recent interview with Entertainment Tonight after receiving her Disney Legends Honor at the D23 Expo, the Oscar winner reacted to Andrews saying she doesn’t “think I should be a part of” Princess Diaries 3.

    “First of all, I just want to say if she has a change of heart, we’re down,” Hathaway said. “Just anything, really. But we also want to be respectful. Like, for goodness sakes, if anybody has contributed to the world of entertainment and to our collective joy, it’s her. Whatever she wants, we completely understand.”

    However, The Odyssey actress added, “We did push really hard to see if she would want to do it.”

    During an interview with The Hollywood Reporter earlier this month, Andrews explained why she doesn’t see herself stepping into Queen Clarisse Renaldi’s shoes again. “I think the absolute truth is that I think I’m really past all that now,” The Sound of Music star confessed. “I’m not completely retired, but it’s a different kind of work that I do these days — [writing] books, and I do a lot of recording of podcasts and voiceovers. But truly, I don’t think I should be a part of it.”

    While details surrounding Princess Diaries 3 are being kept under wraps, the movie is set to be a continuation of the film series, which centers on Mia Thermopolis (Hathaway), who finds out that she is the heir apparent to the throne of Genovia. At the end of the second installment, The Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement, Mia is crowned the queen of Genovia single after Parliament abolishes the law requiring that a queen be married first. However, she also finally gets together with Nicholas Devereaux (Chris Pine) after calling off her wedding to Andrew Jacoby (Callum Blue).

    Hathaway also told ET that she just wants the third installment “to be fun” for those who have been fans since the original film released in 2001.

    “I want the women who were six when the first one came out — a lot of whom are now mothers themselves, maybe even with six-year-olds — I want them to feel like they’re bringing their children to something that mattered to them, a core memory for them, something that was a part of their heart and their lives,” she said. “And that means doing it justice. And that means taking the time that it takes to really build it right. That’s a lot of pressure, but I feel like this is a great team.”

    Adele Lim has been tapped to direct the feature, with Flora Greeson writing the script. Aadrita Mukerji had written an earlier draft of the screenplay before the production team pivoted in a different direction.

  • John Irvin, Director of ‘Hamburger Hill,’ ‘Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy,’ Dies at 86

    John Irvin, Director of ‘Hamburger Hill,’ ‘Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy,’ Dies at 86

    John Irvin, the British director of “Hamburger Hill,” the “Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy” miniseries and 1981’s “Ghost Story,” died Aug. 11. He was 86. 

    His producers confirmed he died at the home of his sister-in-law in the U.K. 

    The award-winning director’s career spanned several decades, each punctuated by a different focus. By the end of his career, Irvin had amassed over 30 films and three BAFTA nominations, with notable credits including “Turtle Diary,” “A Month By the Lake,” “City of Industry” and “Widow’s Peak.” 

    His 1987 Vietnam film “Hamburger Hill,” which starred Don Cheadle, Dylan McDermott, Michael Boatman, Steven Weber and Courtney B. Vance, is seen as one of the most realistic depictions of that war.

    Irvin, along with his twin brother David, was born in Newcastle upon Tyne, Northumberland on May 7, 1940. He graduated from the London Film School in the late 1950s.

    In the 1960s, he created numerous documentaries, including his 1967 short “Mafia No!,” about Italian social activist Danilo Dolci, which was nominated for a BAFTA Award for Best Short Film. Many of these documentaries were created for his own company Mithras Films, the BBC and ITV. 

    “When I did my documentaries, I would have dealings with the security services from time to time but that was MI6 not MI5,” Irvin said of his time shooting a documentary on the North Yemen War. “When I came back from Yemen, where I shot a documentary on the Civil War I was debriefed. There wasn’t much I could tell them, but I was never part of that world or paid. I was far too left-wing, for a start, but was anti-apartheid, anti-war, anti-nuclear. They were probably well aware of my leftwing activities, so I was certainly not involved in any hanky-panky.”

    In the ’70s, he shifted to television shows and made-for-TV-films. One of the most notable was the BBC miniseries adaptation of John le Carré’s “Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy,” which was nominated for a BAFTA Award for Best Drama Series and a Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Limited Series. After working with him, Alec Guinness wrote about Irvin that he “admired a director with balls behind the camera!” 

    By the 1980s and 1990s, he was fully immersed in Hollywood directing big names like Patrick Swayze (“Next of Kin”), Arnold Schwarzenegger (“Raw Deal”) and Uma Thurman 1991’s (“Robin Hood”). 

    “Not many filmmakers directed both Fred Astaire and Patrick Swayze,” Roel Haanen wrote in a 2021 interview. “Or followed up a tender, thoughtful film written by Harold Pinter with an Arnold Schwarzenegger action flick. But John did …”

    After his work with Hollywood, he shifted back to indie films in Europe including “Shiner” starring Michael Caine and “The Boys and Girl from County Clare” starring Andrea Corr and Colm Meaney.

    Most recently, he worked with producer Claire Evan’s on “Mandela’s Gun,” and at the time of his death was working on a new edit of the political thriller.

    In 1970, Irvin married Sophie (née Litchfield) who died of cancer in 1991. Together, John and Sophie had three children; Emilie, Luke, and Amy Irvin, who survive him, and two grandchildren, Finn and Isla Irvin. 

  • ‘Supergirl’ Star David Krumholtz Posts and Deletes Plans to Retire From Acting: ‘And Now, New Life’

    ‘Supergirl’ Star David Krumholtz Posts and Deletes Plans to Retire From Acting: ‘And Now, New Life’

    David Krumholtz, who played Kor-El in this year’s “Supergirl” and appeared in “Oppenheimer” and “The Studio,” said on Threads Monday that he’s done with acting and ready to start a “new life.”

    However, he later deleted the posts that spoke of his frustration with getting jobs in Hollywood, leading fans to speculate whether he is truly ready to turn in his SAG/AFTRA card.

    Krumholtz, who also starred in “Addams Family Values,” wrote, “I kinda sorta put my acting career on hold the other day. It’s been something I’ve been petrified to do for years. Specifically, the fear was that I’d go broke and not be able to handle being out of the game.”

    The post said he “sent the definitive email” that would put his career on hold for now. “A huge wave of relief washed over me. Not sure what I’m going to do for money instead, or how I’m going to do it, but I just removed a humongous burden, one that I truly didn’t fathom the weight of until it was gone. Frustrated, fed up, fried,” he wrote.

    It’s not the first time he has been ready to hang it up, however. Seth Rogen told a story on the “Diary of a CEO” podcast about how Krumholtz, a longtime friend, once told him he was going to quit acting and move to Riverside and start selling BMWs.

    Krumholtz went on to add in his post, “It became clear to me this year, that if I were to continue fighting for parts (what I used to call ‘auditioning’), I’d be doing so for roles that exploit my talent and reputation for a drastically diminishing return. Exploitative art isn’t art. And artists deserve a fair pay percentage for work that assists their employers in making profits. I came up in a time where movie studios and TV networks, no matter how big, were still mom & pop store entities.”

    Reps for Krumholtz did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Credits for Krumholtz, who has appeared in more than 100 film and TV projects, include “10 Things I Hate About You,” “Freaks and Geeks,” “ER,” “The Trouble with Normal,” “The Santa Clause 2,” “Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle,” “Ray,” “Tenacious D in the Pick of Destiny,” “Superbad,” “Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story,” “Numb3rs,” “Raising Hope,” “Childrens Hostpital,” “This Is the End,” “Key and Peele,” “The League,” “The Good Wife,” “The Deuce,” “Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere,” “Forelock” and “The Rookie.”

  • Shifting $576M of forced sales off public order books saved Hyperliquid from a systemic crash

    Shifting $576M of forced sales off public order books saved Hyperliquid from a systemic crash

    Hyperliquid, an on-chain perpetual futures venue, sent most of the forced selling in the worst minute of the October 2025 crypto crash to the Hyperliquid backstop rather than its public order book, according to a new research preprint.

    About $641 million was force-sold on Hyperliquid at 21:19 UTC on Oct. 10, the paper found. Roughly $576 million went to the Hyperliquid backstop, while about $64 million reached the order book.

    The split is relevant because a thinning public order book can push prices lower and force more leveraged positions to close. The Hyperliquid backstop can interrupt that feedback by absorbing orders inside the venue. The preprint has not completed peer review, and its direct measurement covers Hyperliquid rather than the wider market.

    Hyperliquid’s liquidation rules first try to close a position through market orders. Under specified conditions, a liquidator vault can take over the position instead. That vault is a component strategy within the Hyperliquidity Provider (HLP) protocol vault.

    The study found that the backstop absorbed 62.6% of forced-sale value off-book after onset. The event was also highly compressed: 87.8% of forced selling after onset occurred within 30 minutes and 96.5% within one hour.

    The paper tracked $733 million of book-directed forced-sale value across its 15.7-hour post-onset window, including $644 million during the initial nucleation phase. It reported the 62.6% backstop share as a separate off-book series, so the figures describe different parts of its measurement rather than a single combined liquidation total.

    How the Hyperliquid backstop damped liquidation feedback

    The paper modeled the cascade with a branching ratio, or the average number of additional liquidations associated with each forced sale. A ratio approaching 1 would indicate a self-sustaining chain inside the venue.

    Hyperliquid’s structural estimate remained below 0.2 in every measured regime. It reached 0.195 during nucleation and eased to 0.140 at the peak, while a separate amplification calculation implied a ratio of 0.122.

    The authors interpret the Hyperliquid backstop as damping feedback inside the venue at the climax. The finding applies only within the venue; shared prices across exchanges may still have amplified liquidations across the broader market.

    The study places the Hyperliquid backstop in the context of seven major Bitcoin perpetual futures cascades from 2022 through 2025. Its Part I companion, previously covered by CryptoSlate, found no event-invariant early-warning variable across those episodes. Part II shifts from warning signals to the mechanism operating during a cascade.

    Hyperliquid’s fill-log archive begins on May 25, 2025, making the October 2025 event the paper’s only in-flight case study. The authors frame higher realized branching on venues without a comparable backstop as a hypothesis for future cross-venue testing.

  • ‘It has to pass’: Andrew Cuomo warns U.S. is falling behind on crypto rules

    ‘It has to pass’: Andrew Cuomo warns U.S. is falling behind on crypto rules

    Cuomo said years of uncertainty have made it harder for companies to build products in the U.S. while knowing where regulators will draw the line. “You have to know the rules of the game if you want a company to comply,” he said. “What’s fair and what’s foul?”

    He contrasted the U.S. with Europe, where the European Union has implemented a bloc-wide crypto framework. Without federal legislation, Cuomo said, the U.S. risks losing business and investment to markets where the rules are clearer.

    Getting a bill through Congress will require compromise, he said. Cuomo pushed back on attempts to blame either Democrats or Republicans for the holdup and said disagreements over ethics provisions and other parts of the bill should not sink it.

    If Congress doesn’t act, regulators will be left to fill the gap, Cuomo said. That could mean rules change each time political power shifts in Washington, making long-term planning harder for crypto and financial firms.

    Cuomo has a direct stake in how those rules develop. He is leading a joint venture between crypto exchange OKX and Intercontinental Exchange, the owner of the New York Stock Exchange. The venture is building infrastructure to connect crypto with traditional financial markets.

  • Inside the Fake Celebrity Podcast Scam Fooling Hollywood

    Inside the Fake Celebrity Podcast Scam Fooling Hollywood

    When Seth Rudetsky received an invitation to appear on Nikki Glaser’s podcast, he had no particular reason to think it wasn’t real.

    Rudetsky, the Broadway performer and SiriusXM host, gets asked to do podcasts all the time. Better yet, this one was offering him between $4,000 and $5,000 to appear. “Oh my God, they’re actually paying for a podcast,” he remembers thinking. A Glaser fan, Rudetsky quickly said yes.

    The invitation also seemed to know an awful lot about him. It mentioned his Broadway cruise and his work with Sara Bareilles — the kind of details that suggested somebody had actually done their homework.

    “All these specific things about my career,” Rudetsky recalls. “I’m like, oh my God, they totally know my work.”

    But they did not.

    Rudetsky had stumbled into an increasingly sophisticated scam in which fraudsters impersonate famous podcasters and their representatives, using flattering, highly personalized invitations — most likely composed by AI — to lure prospective guests into handing over money, login credentials or control of social media accounts.

    And he is not the only recognizable Hollywood figure who fell for it. Bruce Vilanch believed Terry Gross wanted him on Fresh Air. There is no indication yet if the two scams are connected, but the pattern follows similar AI-assisted scams reported on recently by THR.

    “It was so articulate and so like her,” the veteran comedy writer and performer tells The Hollywood Reporter of an email he believed came from Gross. The correspondence that followed was equally persuasive, laying out the subjects the person identifying themselves as Gross intended to discuss with him, demonstrating what appeared to be deep, actual knowledge of Vilanch’s work.

    “I thought, ‘Well, this must really be Terry,’” Vilanch recalls.

    There were, of course, red flags, in retrospect at least. Vilanch knew Fresh Air was an NPR production with an entire organization behind it, yet Gross seemed to be personally handling the booking. He decided perhaps she was simply “a maverick.”

    Then “Gross” asked him for money. The explanation was tailored to the moment: NPR was a nonprofit, they explained, but the government had cut funding and the organization needed help. Vilanch found the request strange, but by then the correspondence had established enough credibility that he decided to contribute.

    “It felt real,” he says. So he sent the money.

    But the scammers didn’t disappear after getting his money. They continued preparing him for his Fresh Air appearance, sending more questions and ultimately scheduling the interview. When the appointed day arrived, Vilanch clicked the link. Three windows appeared on his screen: himself, one labeled NPR and a third containing a man.

    “Hello, this is Mike,” the man told him. “I will be conducting the interview.”

    Vilanch stared at him in disbelief.

    “No, you won’t,” he replied. “I’m talking to Terry or I’m talking to nobody.”

    The man explained that Gross was conducting another interview. Vilanch’s skepticism finally overwhelmed his willingness to believe. He waited about 15 minutes, then left. He sent one last message to his supposed host: “Whoever you are, I hope you enjoy the paltry sum that I sent.”

    Vilanch then contacted WHYY, the Philadelphia public-radio station that produces Fresh Air, to warn them someone was impersonating Gross. To his surprise, they already knew.

    Vilanch says the station asked him not to immediately post publicly about the scam and told him others had reported similar impersonations. He subsequently spoke with a WHYY media executive and turned over his entire email chain.

    For Rudetsky, the scam had a different objective.

    After accepting the supposed Glaser invitation, he was asked to join her “manager” on Zoom for a technical setup involving Facebook Live. The man’s camera was off. He had a British accent but told Rudetsky he was in Pakistan. Even his email address struck Rudetsky and a colleague as suspiciously literal, something resembling “NikkiGlasersManager [at] Gmail.”

    Yet each compounding oddity was just plausible enough to ignore. Eventually the “manager” began guiding Rudetsky through Facebook permissions. Administrative control of Rudetsky’s page still belonged to a marketing company he’d worked with years earlier, so Rudetsky brought its representative into the process.

    Later that night, Rudetsky tried to log into Facebook. He couldn’t. At first he blamed the marketing rep. Then, lying in bed around midnight, Rudetsky suddenly wondered whether something more sinister had happened. He Googled a combination of words: podcast, scam, celebrity, Facebook. Immediately, he says, he found an article describing essentially what had just happened to him.

    “Oh my God, oh my God,” he remembers thinking.

    Suddenly the oddities made sense: the email address, the manager overseas, the turned-off camera, the elaborate Facebook instructions. Rudetsky eventually regained control of his page. He says his former marketing company was also compromised, although Rudetsky doesn’t know precisely what the scammers accessed or what damage they caused.

    Both Rudetsky and Vilanch were left wondering how people who considered themselves reasonably savvy had been taken in. And both kept returning to the same thing: the extraordinary specificity of the approaches.

    “I know why I fell for it too, because I’m so old. I don’t think about AI,” Rudetsky says.

    The supposed Glaser representatives knew about his Broadway cruise and his work with Bareilles. To Rudetsky, those details functioned almost like authentication.

    “Wow,” he remembers thinking. “Nikki Glaser loves my Broadway cruise.”

    Vilanch experienced much the same thing. The correspondence didn’t merely imitate the mechanics of a booking request. It seemed to imitate Terry Gross’ voice itself, including the preparation and literacy he associated with her.

    “They went above and beyond what they had to do to nail me,” he says. Then he reconsidered how much “work” might actually have been required. “Now I feel less bad because they could probably AI themselves into all of the work that I thought they had done.”

    There appears to be no indication the scammer or scammers behind this web of deception are anywhere close to slowing down. In fact, Rudetsky’s experience did not even end with Nikki Glaser.

    Not long afterward, another invitation arrived, this time supposedly from Amy Poehler’s podcast. Rudetsky actually knows Poehler, so this time he employed the most reliable authentication technology available: He asked Amy Poehler. No, she replied, she hadn’t invited him onto her podcast.

    Rudetsky says the fraudulent invitations continue to arrive. These days he sometimes entertains himself by engaging the scammers to see how far they’ll go, despite being warned that even replying may simply confirm that his email address belongs to an active target.

    After one supposed Poehler representative contacted him, Rudetsky eventually announced that he’d reported the scam. The response was remarkably cool: “Noted. We’ll see what happens next.”

    Vilanch mostly remembers the embarrassment of realizing he’d been taken. “You just feel bad because you feel like a schmuck and because you’ve been duped,” he says.

    Hearing of Rudetsky’s own troubles made him feel a little better.

    “They picked on two nice Jewish boys,” Vilanch says, “who give people the benefit of the doubt.”

  • For Jacob Whiteduck-Lavoie, Everyday on ‘Sterling Point‘ Was the “Best Day Ever”

    For Jacob Whiteduck-Lavoie, Everyday on ‘Sterling Point‘ Was the “Best Day Ever”

    For Sterling Point star Jacob Whiteduck-Lavoie, filming the Prime Video series brought him right back to his childhood. “It felt like when you’re 9 years old, and you’re at summer camp and every day is the best day ever,“ the 23-year-old tells The Hollywood Reporter on a Zoom.

    The Megan Park-created series is a big step forward in Lavoie‘s career. The actor, much like several of his cast members on the show, has been acting since he was a child. He got his first gig a decade ago after his mom had spotted a Facebook post about an open casting call for a child actor who could speak French and was indigenous. Lavoie, who is of Kitigan Zibi Anishinabeg First Nation heritage and grew up on a First Nation reserve in Quebec, was intrigued but a little apprehensive.

    “I didn’t have any experience whatsoever in theater or acting at all, so it was definitely scary having to learn lines and going into audition,“ says Lavoie. But his mother was persistent and encouraged him to at least give it a try. Thankfully, the team loved his audition and cast him on the spot.

    That 20-day indie film shoot became the moment he fell in love with acting. He signed with an agent in Montreal and continued working on French-speaking productions. Despite leading a show in Canada, Premier Trio, he found he wasn‘t getting English self-tapes. While Lavoie loved his time working on French-speaking roles, he had aspirations to break into the English-speaking productions as it‘s a much smaller industry.

    “[Sterling Point] is the biggest project I’ve ever done in my life,“ he says. The show has allowed him to break into the English-speaking market.

    Lavoie is still grateful to work on the show and get to work with Park and executive producers Josh Schwartz and Stephanie Savage. But perhaps the person he was most grateful to work with was Jeffrey Dean Morgan, or “JDM,” as Lavoie calls him.

    In Sterling Point, Lavoie plays Ellis, a Canadian teen who meets the show‘s leading lady and newcomer to town, Annie, played by Ella Rubin. He becomes one-third of the show‘s main love triangle. Morgan plays his father, Joe, who is later revealed to have his own dealings with Annie‘s family.

    “When I found out that he was going to play my dad, I couldn’t believe it, honestly,” the actor says. “I personally was a fan of The Walking Dead as a kid, so when I found that out, I kind of shat my pants a little bit. I was like, ‘Crap, Negin’s my dad. What?’”

    The young cast of the show, rounded out by Amélie Hoeferle, Daniel Quinn-Toye, Bo Bragason, Keen Ruffalo and Mabel Strachan, were very close during the shoot. Lavoie knew none of the other actors — no one on the cast knew each other before the shoot — but everything felt natural.

    “Everybody got to know each other so well and so quickly. I just love these people so dearly, and everyone’s just such a good actor,“ he continues. “I’ve learned so much working with them.“

    Sterling Point wasn‘t the first show Lavoie had been in that featured a cast full of other actors his age. Premier Trio, the Canadian show he led, was a young-adult hockey show. But his personal experience was very different between the series.

    On Premier Trio, he was the oldest actor, and there was quite a gap between his co-stars — he recalls being 19 and his love interest being four years younger than him — and that made the dynamics different. “I felt like I needed to lead because I just felt like I was the older brother on the show,“ he says.

    Lavoie was the second-youngest on Sterling Point. He jokes that he felt like the “little baby“ of the group. “To work with people your age is just always so much fun and makes the experience just so much more fun,“ he says. “It was like we were just this tight group of friends and did everything together. On our off days, we were playing pickleball and always at the park doing something. It was really magical.”

    Thanks to Park, Lavoie felt extremely comfortable on the set. He admits he was nervous going into the show, but the showrunner, creator, writer and director helped keep him calm — he notes that she has a “young soul“ that makes anyone feel like her best friend instantly. The actor found that attitude take the pressure off of his shoulders.

    Lavoie recalls Park empowering the actors. “She’d let us improvise a lot,“ he says.

    “I remember she told us on the first few weeks, ‘Honestly guys, obviously, I wrote this script, but if you guys want to go off script and just say this line or say this however you feel like, just do it because you guys are the Gen Z and we’re trying to make the Gen Z audience connect and relate,’“ he adds. It seems to have worked, as the authentic dialogue has been a talking point on social media since Sterling Point came out earlier this month.

    Lavoie still has one hope for what‘s next after. He adds, “I hope we get a season two because I want to live it again.“

  • David Krumholtz Says He’s Retiring from Acting in Shock Social Post: “Profession Has Lost Its Gleam”

    David Krumholtz Says He’s Retiring from Acting in Shock Social Post: “Profession Has Lost Its Gleam”

    He’s amassed more than 140 credits on an enviable resumé that dates back to the early 1990s, but David Krumholtz seems ready to throw in the towel on his Hollywood career.

    In a shocking announcement posted (and later deleted) on social media, Krumholtz said he’s “frustrated, fed up, fried” with the business, so much so that he already sent an email to declare it done. Once the decision was made, Krumholtz felt a “huge wave of relief” wash over him.

    “I kinda sorta put my acting career on hold the other day. It’s been something I’ve been petrified to do for years. Specifically, the fear was that I’d go broke and not be able to handle being out of the game. But I sent the definitive email,” he shared on Threads. “And gotta say, a huge wave of relief washed over me. Not sure what I’m going to do for money instead, or how I’m going to do it, but I just removed a humongous burden, one that I truly didn’t fathom the weight of until it was gone. Frustrated, fed up, fried.”

    The post received tons of traction immediately, and Krumholtz continued the conversation by responding in comments to fans expressing their disappointment, encouragement or support, as well as posting additional replies. “The love and encouragement re: my last post is overwhelmingly surprising. Acting professionally is a very different concept than the exercise of acting itself. I’ve enjoyed every single minute of exercising the muscle. I’ve enjoyed the fanfare. There was a time when being competitive and self-involved really served my pursuit. That time has passed. Much to MY overwhelming surprise. There will always be great joy in the exercise. But for me, the profession has lost its gleam.”

    Fellow actor Garret Dillahunt was among those who responded by posting, “This is sad news for me. But I am happy for you. I understand completely.” Krumholtz wrote back and further elaborated on his next moves: “Ain’t over, rather, redefining my terms. Hoping to find a new, more rewarding passion. Me, my product, and [my] mentality is not working anymore. I want to try to be of service. No crystal ball.”

    The 48-year-old veteran actor hails from New York and has worked consistently since breaking into the business on both the big and small screens with parts in Law & Order, Life with Mikey, Addams Family Values, The Santa Clause franchise (playing the beloved Head Elf Bernard) and the Ice Storm, to name a few early roles. He had regular roles on such shows as Monty, Chicago Sons, The Closer, The Trouble With Normal and Numb3rs, the latter of which lasted the longest with 119 episodes.

    He also starred in high-profile movies like Slums of Beverly Hills opposite Natasha Lyonne, 10 Things I Hate About You, The Mexican, Sidewalks of New York, Ray, Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle, Crazy for Love, Bobby, Superbad, This is the End, Hail, Caesar! and more. He played Isidor Rabi in Christopher Nolan’s best picture winner Oppenheimer, which earned him rave reviews, and had a busy last couple of years starring in Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere and opposite Seth Rogen in The Studio and Sausage Party: Foodtopia. Most recently, he starred as Zor-El in Supergirl.

    Krumholtz at the Supergirl world premiere in New York on June 22, 2026.

    (Photo by Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for Warner Bros. Pictures)

    David Krumholtz and cast members from Leopoldstadt are seen on stage during the Broadway show’s opening night at New York’s Longacre Theatre on Oct. 2, 2022.

    (Photo by Roy Rochlin/Getty Images)

    David Krumholtz and Rob Morrow celebrate the 100th episode of CBS’s Numb3rs at the LA Center Studios on March 25, 2009.

    (Photo by Michael Buckner/Getty Images)

    Kal Penn, Krumholtz, John Cho and Neil Patrick Harris at the afterparty for the premiere of New Line Cinema’s Harold and Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay at the Green Door in L.A. on April 17, 2008.

    (Photo by Kevin Winter/Getty Images)

    Cillian Murphy as J. Robert Oppenheimer and Krumholtz as Isidor Rabi in Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer.

    Melinda Sue Gordon/Universal Pictures

  • CFTC seeks feedback on CPO and CTA rule changes

    CFTC seeks feedback on CPO and CTA rule changes

    The CFTC has opened a 45-day comment period on proposals that would double the small-pool exemption threshold to $800,000 and ease registration rules for some fund advisers.

    CFTC proposal would reduce duplicate fund registration

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission said in an Aug. 18 regulatory announcement that it had proposed amendments to Part 4 of its rules, which govern commodity pool operators, or CPOs, and commodity trading advisers, known as CTAs.

    Under the proposal, certain investment advisers already registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission could avoid separate CPO registration for qualifying commodity pools. The exemption would apply only when the pool meets several conditions, including limits on who may invest.

    A commodity pool combines money from multiple participants to trade futures, options, swaps, or other commodity interests. Its operator generally must register with the CFTC unless an exemption applies, while a person who provides trading advice may also have to register as a CTA.

    SEC-registered advisers can fall under both regulatory systems when the private funds they manage trade commodity interests. According to the CFTC, requiring full registration under both systems may produce overlapping compliance duties without providing enough additional regulatory benefit.

    “By continuing to address overly burdensome and duplicative rules for its registrants, the CFTC is delivering on its mandate to promote U.S. market competitiveness,” CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig said.

    Selig added that the agency intended to reduce compliance costs for American businesses while preserving market integrity.

    The proposed exemption would not remove all regulatory requirements. Advisers seeking relief would still need to satisfy the SEC’s rules under the Investment Advisers Act, including applicable conduct, examination, disclosure, and reporting requirements.

    CFTC exemption would cover pools for sophisticated investors

    Proposed Regulation 4.13(a)(4) would limit the CPO exemption to SEC-registered investment advisers operating eligible pools for defined groups of sophisticated investors.

    Natural-person participants would generally need to fall within Qualified Eligible Person categories that do not require them to pass the CFTC’s portfolio test. Eligible entities could include QEPs and certain accredited investors listed under the SEC’s Regulation D.

    Rather than changing the financial thresholds used to qualify as a QEP, the proposal uses existing investor categories to determine which pools may receive registration relief.

    The CFTC previously increased the portfolio thresholds attached to some QEP categories in 2024. Under the updated standard, a person subject to the test may qualify by owning at least $4 million in securities and other assets, holding at least $400,000 in required margin and option premiums, or meeting a combination of the two tests.

    Published in September 2024, the final rule doubled the previous thresholds of $2 million and $200,000. Compliance with the new amounts began six months after the rule appeared in the Federal Register.

    Separate conditions in the new proposal would require interests in eligible pools to remain exempt from Securities Act registration. Public marketing in the United States would generally be restricted, although pools using Rule 506(c) could conduct general solicitation when every purchaser is an accredited investor and the issuer takes reasonable steps to verify that status.

    Where SEC rules require a Form PF filing for an eligible private fund, the adviser would also need to file that form to claim the proposed CFTC exemption. Form PF supplies regulators with information used for investor protection and systemic-risk monitoring.

    The CFTC and SEC already operate under a memorandum of understanding that allows them to share Form PF information. The commission said the arrangement could preserve access to fund data without making advisers submit overlapping reports to both agencies.

    Eligible advisers would still have to file an exemption notice through the National Futures Association’s online registration system. Annual notices would be required to confirm continued reliance on the exemption, along with updates when filed information becomes inaccurate or incomplete.

    Proposed rules would formalize temporary CFTC relief

    The plan would place parts of existing staff relief into the CFTC’s regulations, giving qualifying advisers a formal rule instead of leaving them dependent on a no-action position.

    CFTC Market Participants Division Letter 25-50, issued in December 2025, provided interim registration relief for certain SEC-registered advisers managing pools restricted to QEPs. The letter covered some advisers who would otherwise need to register as CPOs or CTAs and also allowed eligible firms to withdraw existing registrations.

    Staff issued the relief after the commission had removed a similar QEP exemption in 2012. The earlier exemption, adopted in 2003, allowed operators of certain privately offered pools to avoid registration when participation was restricted to qualifying investors.

    According to the new proposal, applying Letter 25-50 alongside National Futures Association processes proved complex and time-consuming. Converting the policy into Regulation 4.13(a)(4) would establish a public set of eligibility conditions adopted through the federal notice-and-comment process.

    The CFTC said a final rule would supersede specified no-action positions, including relief provided through Letters 25-50 and 26-06. Until the commission adopts a final rule, however, the proposal does not itself replace the current registration framework or the staff letters.

    A related amendment to Regulation 4.14 would extend CTA registration relief to qualifying advisers serving pools covered by the proposed CPO exemption. The CFTC described the CTA change as a limited expansion because many affected advisers already qualify for relief when serving other permitted clients.

    Small-pool exemption threshold could double

    For smaller fund operators, the proposal would raise the maximum gross capital contributions allowed under the small-pool exemption from $400,000 to $800,000.

    Regulation 4.13(a)(2) currently permits an exemption for operators whose pools have no more than 15 participants and whose total gross capital contributions across all operated or planned pools do not exceed $400,000, subject to exclusions for certain contributions.

    The commission last adjusted the monetary limit in 2003, when it doubled the threshold from $200,000 to $400,000. Using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, the agency calculated that $400,000 in January 2003 had the same purchasing power as approximately $735,097 in July 2026.

    Rounding that figure to $800,000 would provide a simpler limit for fund operators, according to the proposal. The 15-participant cap would remain unchanged, as would existing rules that exclude specified contributions from the calculation.

    Operators using the expanded exemption would still need to complete initial and annual notice filings. Anti-fraud provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act would also continue to apply to exempt pools.

    Crypto policy remains on another CFTC track

    The Part 4 proposal does not create a registration system for cryptocurrency platforms or change the CFTC’s authority over digital-asset spot markets. Crypto-focused private funds may still be affected when their trading activity makes them commodity pools, but eligibility for relief would depend on the same conditions applied to other qualifying funds.

    Meanwhile, crypto.news previously reported that the CFTC’s first Innovation Advisory Committee meeting will take place on Aug. 20. Its agenda includes crypto assets, artificial intelligence, and prediction markets, with public statements accepted through Aug. 27.

    The committee’s crypto session will examine federal market-structure questions, overlapping regulatory authority, customer protection, and market integrity. It will not vote on the CPO and CTA proposal or adopt binding digital-asset rules.

    Congress is considering separate legislation that could alter how the SEC and CFTC divide digital-asset oversight. A May review of the CLARITY Act explained that the bill would give the CFTC authority over specified digital commodities while leaving investment-contract assets under SEC oversight.

    For the Part 4 rulemaking, written comments must identify RIN 3038-AF61 and reach the Commission within 45 days after the proposal is published in the Federal Register. The CFTC has requested feedback on the proposed exemptions, their eligibility conditions, expected costs and benefits, and the increase in the small-pool capital limit.