Blog

  • AG Todd Blanche didn’t say predators in Epstein files wouldn’t be prosecuted

    AG Todd Blanche didn’t say predators in Epstein files wouldn’t be prosecuted

    Claim:

    U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche said, “We’re not going to prosecute the predators in the Epstein files and we’re not going to release their names to the public.”

    Rating:

    Incorrect Attribution

    In late August and early September 2026, rumors circulated that U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche once stated during a news conference that there were no plans for prosecutions or a public release of predators named in the files of Jeffrey Epstein, the late sex offender and financier. 

    Users across social media platforms and Reddit posted about the alleged quote, claiming the AG made the statement during a news conference discussing the DOJ’s investigation of Epstein and his associates. 

    According to the rumor, Blanche purportedly said, “We’re not going to prosecute the predators in the Epstein files and we’re not going to release their names to the public.”

    The rumor circulated online previously but gained renewed popularity after Blanche was confirmed as attorney general in August. 

    The quote is incorrectly attributed to Blanche. 

    It wasn’t spoken in the video clip circulating with the alleged statement, and there is no evidence he ever publicly said the words in question. Searches of Bing, DuckDuckGo, Google and Yahoo returned no relevant results from credible media outlets about such a quote, which would have been widely reported. 

    The clip accompanying the quote is from a Jan. 30, 2026, news conference in which Blanche announced the final release of files related to the DOJ’s investigation into Epstein. 

    Snopes reached out to Blanche for further comment on this claim and will update this article if we hear back. 

    It’s unclear whether the falsely attributed quote was intentionally misleading or a botched attempt to summarize Blanche’s comments. A full viewing of the news conference and reading of its transcript showed no statement matching that shared in the claim. 

    At the 21:07 mark of the video, viewable on C-SPAN, Blanche responded to a reporter’s question about whether the men in the Epstein files accused of abusing women would be prosecuted and have their names made public. 

    Blanche responded:

    If we had information, we meaning the Department of Justice, about men who abused women, we would prosecute them.

    […]

    There is this built-in assumption that somehow there is a hidden tranche of information of men that we know about that we’re covering up or that we’re choosing not to prosecute. That is not the case. I do not know whether there are men out there who abused these women. If we learn about information and evidence that allows us to prosecute them, you better believe we will. But I do not think that the public, or you all [reporters], are going to uncover men within the Epstein files that abused women, unfortunately.

    Whether what he said is true or false is open to speculation. Still, it’s evident that Blanche did not directly state, “We’re not going to prosecute the predators in the Epstein files and we’re not going to release their names to the public.” 

    Users sharing the alleged quote appeared to be attempting to twist Blanche’s intended meaning into a declarative statement that he never actually made. 

    Further, Blanche began the Jan. 30 news conference with a statement about the variety of sex criminals he said the DOJ had prosecuted in the last year. 

    Every single day of the year, the Department of Justice investigates and prosecutes those who abuse and traffic young women and children. Just last year, the FBI located over 2,700 victims of child exploitation. The Department of Justice found and terminated 3.8 million dark web pedophile accounts. In August, we charged 11 defendants for extensive sex trafficking of illegal immigrants and underaged women. Last month we charged five men who were engaged in a sadistic sex extortion network of young men abusing women. Over the past several months last summer and into the fall, we executed Operation Restore Justice, rescuing 205 child victims and arresting 293 offenders.

    Blanche added that he wanted to point these numbers out specifically because of accusations that the DOJ “does not take child exploitation or sex trafficking seriously.”

    Blanche echoed similar sentiments in an interview with ABC News published on Feb. 1, 2026, in which he said, “We have nothing to hide. We never did, and our doors are open if they want to come and review any of the materials that we produced.”

  • ‘Misty Green’ Review: Rosalind Eleazar Is a Revelation in Chris Rock’s Sharply Observed Love-Hate Portrait of the Hollywood Hustle 

    ‘Misty Green’ Review: Rosalind Eleazar Is a Revelation in Chris Rock’s Sharply Observed Love-Hate Portrait of the Hollywood Hustle 

    The title characer in Chris Rock’s sure-footed fourth feature as director, Misty Green, is having a rough week. An actress still best known for a TV series that ended years back, she’s about to be evicted, her bipolar brother is fresh out of a psych ward and in need of both emotional and financial support, a pimpy former colleague dangles a lucrative sex-work gig, and while her undeniable gifts might very well help her book an acting job, the many axes she has to grind in the entertainment industry keep getting in the way.

    In a star-making performance, Rosalind Eleazar — best known as the tough MI5 operative grieving for her partner on Slow Horses — bites into this gift of a role with grit, tenacity and zero-fucks-given scrappiness. It’s a revelatory turn in a sensitively observed drama that depicts Los Angeles as both a shimmering beacon of fame and success and a soul-sucking grind of constant rejection, where disparities of race, class and gender are as much an obstacle as that casting director who seems to hate you. Following its premieres at the Toronto and New York film festivals, A24 will release the movie Oct. 9.

    Misty Green

    The Bottom Line

    Simultaneously breezy and steeped in melancholy.

    Venue: Toronto International Film Festival (Gala Presentations)
    Release date: Friday, Oct. 9
    Cast: Rosalind Eleazar, Adam Driver, Daniel Kaluuya, Anna Kendrick, Chris Rock, Topher Grace, Alexandra Shipp, Amy Landecker, Tracie Thoms, Necar Zadegan, Rich Sommer
    Director-screenwriter: Chris Rock

    Rated R,
    1 hour 44 minutes

    Coming 12 years after Rock’s last feature as writer-director, Top Five, a highly entertaining account of the quest to be taken seriously of a standup comic with a history of substance abuse issues, Misty Green is both an extension of certain themes explored in the 2014 film and a departure. While Andre Allen, Rock’s character in the earlier movie, had a fear of not being funny when sober, Eleazar’s Misty is more of a dabbler than an addict. But her problems with impulse control make it hard for her to say no to a night of hard partying, which tends to mess with her professional obligations.

    The biggest difference, however, is that Misty Green is a significantly more mellow and thoughtful movie, the work of a mature director who knows what he wants to say and has full command of the tone of voice in which to say it. The film is frequently funny, but Rock and his actors never push for comedy. The wry humor is undergirded by melancholy, darkness, despair — by an awareness that even when you appear to have made it in Hollywood, maintaining that perch on the success ladder is not a given. Talent alone often is not enough.

    Misty appears to have been floundering for years, bristling every time some young up-and-comer tells her how much their mom and dad loved her in her Emmy-winning role on a show called Red Eye. She’s handed a deadline to pull herself out of her rut when Celine (Amy Landecker, hilariously caustic) bursts in unannounced to kick Misty out of her late husband’s apartment. Dazed and hungover, Misty protests that Celine’s husband gave her the apartment, but the unmerry widow is not buying it, giving her a week to find new digs. The industry town’s monomania makes it seem almost normal when Celine starts running audition lines with her before begrudgingly agreeing to the seven-day grace period.

    With no money and no friends or exes willing to help her out, Misty needs to book a role, pronto. But given her abrasive reputation — she was once fired off a film for punching the wardrobe woman in the face — that’s not easy. 

    Things are further complicated by the reappearance of her loose-cannon brother Jay (Daniel Kaluuya), released from a psych ward but still only tenuously in control of his mental health. Her occasional hook-up, the slick and insincere Zach (Adam Driver), tempts her out on the town the night before an important audition, offering her a chance at big money if she’s willing to put aside her moral qualms and be part of the “entertainment” for a frisky emir at a lavish party in Dubai. Driver has often been fearless about playing unlikable characters, but Zach takes him to new lows of douchiness when he’s tossing Birkin bags, jewels and cash to a screaming crowd of paid models.

    Her least complicated relationship is with straight-talking bestie Naomi (Anna Kendrick), with whom she works out at a gym near the Santa Monica Pier. Naomi serves as a sounding board and support system for Misty’s anxieties. That’s more than she gets from her agent Randy (Topher Grace), who throws up his hands in defeat after another abortive audition, telling her, “No one wants to work with you. You’re too difficult!”

    While this is very much an ensemble piece, with a bright constellation around Eleazar’s blazing supernova, Rock gives himself a choice suporting role as the one person in the industry who might not have given up on Misty. Jordan is a director who was forced to fire Misty some years back for her anger issues. He’s now staying in her apartment building while holding auditions for a Dreamgirls remake, and while he’s wary about working with the volatile Misty again, he doesn’t rule it out.

    That remains true even after she gets high with Zach while on an impromtpu date with Jordan, getting them both banged up in a car accident. She goes back to her apartment — where the eviction clock keeps ticking — and tips her stash of booze and pills down the drain, probably not for the first time, but maybe the last? 

    Jordan often gets to channel classic Rock humor (“All civil rights movies suck, you wanna know how I know? Because white people like them!”), but the character is also notable for his sensitivity, even soulfulness. Jordan is an industry veteran with genuine empathy for people like Misty, coughed up and spat out while trying to sustain a career in the face of endless closed doors. The chemistry of Eleazar’s scenes with Rock is sublime.

    Eleazar’s layered, brittle but also vulnerable performance makes Misty’s depths as a performer apparent, notably in two songs. She sings with moving expressiveness on a torchy version of “One Night Only” in her Dreamgirls audition and a stunningly heartfelt take on Radiohead’s “Creep,” in a Hollywood Roosevelt lounge bar gig.

    Naturally, her propensity for self-sabotage means her path is one step forward, two steps back, through no fault of her own when Jay loses his cool after being pulled over twice by the same Black cop (Anthony Anderson, one of a handful of cameos) in both cases with no cause beyond racial profiling. When Jay lands in prison, the fiercely protective Misty feels obligated to come up with his exorbitant bail, prompting desperate choices that nudge her career goals aside.

    Throughout all this, Eleazar keeps us firmly in Misty’s corner in a bold performance that simultaneously pushes the audience away while pulling us in. The tenderness with which Rock has built this vehicle around character, actress and a milieu he clearly knows intimately imbue the material with an aching depth of feeling that stayed with me for days.

    Misty Green is a poignant snapshot of one woman sweating on the showbiz treadmill, in a town where glittering dreams, crushing defeat and emergency compromise solutions often walk in tandem — the latter echoed in constant local crime news reports heard on car radios. Misty’s personality flaws are what make her so captivating in a smart, refreshingly understated movie that’s very much an insider’s view — jaded, but also clear-eyed — and a credit especially to Rock and Eleazar.

  • Toronto Awards Analysis: ‘I Play Rocky’ Channels Namesake, Could Follow in Its Oscar Footsteps

    Toronto Awards Analysis: ‘I Play Rocky’ Channels Namesake, Could Follow in Its Oscar Footsteps

    Sometimes, history repeats itself.

    Exactly a half-century ago, in the year of the American bicentennial, a low-profile film — the story of a small-time boxer who, against all odds, went the distance against the champ — became a gigantic hit and ended up vanquishing the likes of All the President’s Men, Network and Taxi Driver to win the best picture Oscar. That film was John G. Avildsen’s Rocky, which was written by and starred Sylvester Stallone.

    Eight years ago, another film with a low-profile premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival, where it polarized critics but played through the roof with festivalgoers and ended up winning the TIFF audience award en route to several Oscar nominations, including one for best picture, which it ultimately won. That film was Peter Farrelly’s Green Book.

    On Saturday night, Farrelly returned to TIFF for the world premiere of I Play Rocky, a film about the inspiration for and making of Rocky. Like Green Book, it polarized critics, but delighted festivalgoers — indeed, it generated numerous instances of mid-film applause, as well as a lengthy standing ovation at the end — and it will probably follow in the footsteps of Rocky and Green Book to a best picture Oscar nom, if not a win.

    If nothing else, I Play Rocky will catapult its little-known star, Anthony Ippolito, who plays Stallone, into the thick of a crowded best actor Oscar race. The 27-year-old eerily channels Sly’s unconventional but iconic appearance and manner of speaking, and, as was the case with Stallone 50 years ago, the story of his path to his career-changing part will have many rooting for him as much as the character he plays.

    Anthony Ippolito as Sylvester Stallone in ‘I Play Rocky’

    Claire Folger/Amazon MGM Studios

    The biggest hazard for I Play Rocky, which Amazon/MGM is set to begin rolling out in the U.S. on Nov. 6, is Stallone himself.

    In THR’s TIFF lounge, Ippolito said he had spoken with Stallone before playing him and Farrelly said he had shown Stallone the finished film and Stallone was pleased with it. And during remarks from the TIFF stage just before the film unspooled, Farrelly gave a shout out to Stallone.

    But Stallone was not directly involved with — nor does it seems he will financially benefit from — I Play Rocky. And if the recent past is any indication, he believes he deserves a cut of anything Rocky-related: indeed, in 2022, he publicly blasted Irwin Winkler, one of the two producers of the original Rocky, who helped to give him his big break, for not giving him an equity stake in the franchise.

    Winkler and the other producer, Robert Chartoff, who died in 2015, are both portrayed in the film (by P.J. Byrne and Toby Kebbell, respectively) rather sympathetically. The real Winkler, now 95, also makes a cameo in it. And Chartoff’s widow was at the premiere. In other words, it seems that the Winklers and Chartoffs are happy with the film.

    If Stallone, who turned 80 in July, were to publicly lash out against I Play Rocky, that could really harm its Oscar prospects. But if he were to publicly champion it, that could really help them. And to be honest, he has a lot of reason to be happy about the film: written by Peter Gamble, it is essentially a celebration of his smarts, tenacity and talent — plus, it basically prints the legend about the origin of Rocky that Stallone has been repeating for the past half-century, not all of which stands up to close scrutiny.

    In addition to Gamble’s script and Ippolito’s star turn, other strong work in the film is done by supporting performers AnnaSophia Robb (as Stallone’s first wife), Tracy Letters (as the head of United Artists) and Jay Duplass (as Avildsen); cinematographer Sean Porter (who also shot Green Book); production designer Anthony Gasparro; makeup artist Jackie Risotto; and hairstylist Nakoya Yancey.

  • FCC Chairman Slams James Talarico as Running a ‘Hoax’ With Jimmy Kimmel Interview, Which ABC Punted to YouTube, to Get ‘Clicks and Donations’

    FCC Chairman Slams James Talarico as Running a ‘Hoax’ With Jimmy Kimmel Interview, Which ABC Punted to YouTube, to Get ‘Clicks and Donations’

    Brendan Carr, the Trump-aligned Republican chairman of the FCC, accused James Talarico, a Texas Democrat running for the U.S. Senate, of running a “hoax” to garner attention and campaign donations by sitting for an interview with Jimmy Kimmel — which ABC put on YouTube instead airing it on broadcast TV to avoid a potential clash with the FCC.

    In a post on X Saturday night, Carr wrote that Talarico is “just running the same hoax he did a few months ago on Colbert for the purpose of getting clicks and donations — he’s banking on people not understanding the statute or operating as partisan lemmings.”

    Carr’s post included a meme mocking Talarico and Kimmel meant to show a self-inflicted fail. It depicts Kimmel riding a bike with Talarico tucked into a baby backpack carrier on the TV host’s shoulders; Kimmel then inserts a stick into the spokes, causing the bike to crash.

    Variety has reached out to Talarico’s press office for comment.

    Kimmel on Wednesday announced on his ABC late-night show that the interview Talarico would be on YouTube and not TV, saying the decision was made “out of consideration for our local stations, especially our ABC affiliates in Texas who would have to deal with this nonsense.”

    The concern was that the FCC would retaliate against ABC over Talarico’s appearance under the agency’s equal-time rule, which requires broadcast programs give equivalent airtime to political candidates (unless they are “bona fide” news programs). Late-night shows and daytime talk shows have long been considered exempt from the rule. But earlier this year, Carr kicked off a formal review of whether ABC daytime talk show “The View” qualifies for an exemption to the equal-time rule. The FCC chairman has alleged that many talk shows on broadcast networks function as partisan mouthpieces for Democrats and should be subject to agency regulations like the equal-time rule and a prohibition on “news distortion,” because they are using publicly licensed TV spectrum.

    Talarico characterized ABC’s decision to abstain from putting his interview with Kimmel on TV as effectively amounting to censorship by the U.S. government. “Government censorship should be a concern to all of us, regardless of our political party,” Talarico said in an interview Thursday on MS NOW. The Democrat called the FCC’s threats against broadcasters over “The View” and other programming “the most dangerous form of cancel culture.”

    After Kimmel’s interview with Talarico was posted Thursday on YouTube, it notched over 5 million views in the first 24 hours. As of this writing, it has racked up 7.3 million views on the platform.

    “We are being targeted by the FCC for the crime of interviewing political candidates,” Kimmel said at the top of the segment. “Even though, for years, we and every other late-night talk show have welcomed numerous candidates including Donald Trump when he was running [for president]. He was on this show two times. But now I guess he doesn’t like me anymore or the First Amendment. And so the FCC has threatened me or threatened my show, our network, even our local ABC stations because they want to make our editorial decisions for us, which of course we cannot accept. And so tonight, we are bypassing the public airwaves and hosting this interview on YouTube, even though our government would clearly prefer that we not do it at all.”

    Earlier this year, Talarico similarly was kept off TV over CBS’s fear of running afoul of Carr’s enforcement of the FCC equal time rule. In February, Stephen Colbert said CBS execs pulled his interview with Talarico from air over concerns about violating the equal time rule. CBS said it didn’t block the interview from airing but that the network provided “The Late Show” producers “legal guidance that the broadcast could trigger the FCC equal-time rule.”

    Meanwhile, ABC has dragged the FCC into federal court over the agency’s demand it submit licenses for its eight owned-and-operated TV stations early renewal. ABC sued the FCC and Carr last month, alleging the commission was waging an “extraordinary assault” on its First Amendment rights through the implicit threat of revoking its local TV broadcast. The Disney-owned broadcaster’s lawsuit alleged that the FCC’s “true target” is not the stations’ employment practices but the content of their programming: “Because the Commission cannot regulate that content directly, it has used its review of the Stations’ licenses as an instrument to the same end,” the suit said. The FCC asserts the ABC early license renewal was initiated from the agency’s investigation into “allegations of unlawful discrimination” in employment practices at Disney and ABC. On Sept. 3, the agency asked the court to dismiss ABC’s lawsuit, arguing that the network failed to establish that the license review represents “retaliation” for disfavored speech.

    Carr, in his Saturday-night commentary, was responding to a comment on X by an organization called University Democrats at UT Austin, which asked rhetorically, “So I can’t watch Talarico on Kimmel but I have to watch Ted Cruz on GameDay?” That’s a reference to an appearance on ESPN’s “College GameDay” Saturday by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who was on-air for almost 10 minutes. Cruz, who spent most of his time on the program lobbying for the Protect College Sports Act legislation that would impose new restrictions on collegiate sports practices, was loudly heckled and booed by the fans in attendance.

    Carr, who was appointed chairman of the FCC by Donald Trump in 2025, noted that the FCC’s equal-time rule doesn’t apply to ESPN’s “College GameDay” because Congress applied it to broadcast TV stations, not cable networks. In addition, he pointed out correctly, the statute only applies to “legally qualified candidates” running for office.

    He also argued that the equal-time statute “does not prohibit anyone from interviewing anyone on broadcast tv. It is about more speech, not less. Congress wanted to ensure that voters would decide elections, not media gatekeepers picking winners and losers by providing preferential airtime to some candidates and not others.”

    Carr, explaining why broadcast and cable networks are regulated differently by the FCC, continued, “Broadcasters are unique. The FCC gave them free licenses worth many billions of dollars to use a public resource (spectrum). They are given a government sanctioned monopoly on their broadcast frequencies, too. If anyone else wants to use that same public resource (spectrum) for the purpose of expressing their own views, the government will not let them — it will eject anyone else that tries to use a broadcaster’s licensed spectrum.”

    The Supreme Court has ruled that “holding broadcasters to their public interest obligations is not censorship or any sort of 1A [First Amendment] violation,” Carr wrote. “And Congress has charged the FCC with ensuring that broadcasters meet those public interest obligations, as required by their licenses. The agency should do so.”

    Of course, today, most Americans watch broadcast television networks like ABC on cable, satellite or internet pay-TV services — not using over-the-air antennas.

    In response to Carr’s 479-word post, UT Austin’s University Democrats wrote, “ok brandon.”

  • Morgan Stanley’s $50.6M BTC buying shields market – But rally to $82K has THIS hurdle

    Morgan Stanley’s $50.6M BTC buying shields market – But rally to $82K has THIS hurdle

    The institutional demand around Bitcoin strengthened as Morgan Stanley expanded MSBT holdings while ETF inflows remained positive.

    Reportedly, Morgan Stanley’s MSBT Bitcoin ETF received another 51.58 $BTC, valued at around $4 million, from Coinbase Prime.

    Notably, the latest transaction followed a series of transfers into the fund for the previous two weeks. Across these transfers, MSBT has now received a total of 641.87 $BTC, worth roughly $50.6 million.

    Therefore, Morgan Stanley’s persistent accumulation enhanced Bitcoin’s institutional demand narrative as its price consolidated after a rapid expansion.

    Importantly, the transfers showed several additions across the two-week period, rather than reflecting a single large transaction. The pattern became particularly notable as Bitcoin remained beneath its recent $82,000 resistance.

    Therefore, the institutional accumulation continued while Bitcoin consolidated, potentially supporting demand around its current price structure.

    ETF inflows broaden the demand picture

    Beyond Morgan Stanley, the broader Bitcoin spot ETF flows also remained positive during the most recent reporting period.

    Specifically, Bitcoin spot ETFs registered $6 million in daily total net inflows, equivalent to roughly 78.39 $BTC. Meanwhile, the cumulative net inflows reached nearly $55.63 billion, representing around 695,820 $BTC tokens.

    These positive flows implied that institutional demand extended beyond Morgan Stanley’s recent accumulation.

    The daily figure, however, remained relatively modest compared with the total cumulative ETF inflow.

    Even so, the positive flows complemented MSBT’s accumulation, thus strengthening the broader demand outlook around Bitcoin.

    Therefore persistent ETF inflows could provide additional buying support in case Bitcoin continues defending its current demand area.

    Source: CoinGlass

    Persistent outflows keep exchange supply restrained

    Additionally, exchange activity provided another supportive element, as Bitcoin Spot Netflows remained predominantly negative across the displayed period.

    Notably, the most recent reading registered a netflow of -$6.66 million on September 12, continuing the broader pattern of frequent spot outflows.

    The negative netflow figure suggested that withdrawals exceeded deposits, rather than representing the actual volume withdrawn from exchanges.

    Therefore, the continued negative netflows indicated that more $BTC generally left exchanges than entered them during those sessions.

    Consequently, this trend limited the immediate supply pressure as the institutional players continued accumulating Bitcoin.

    Eventually, sustained negative netflows could tighten the supply conditions further if the institutional demand remain positive.

    Source: CoinGlass

    Can Bitcoin turn its order block higher?

    At the time of reporting, Bitcoin traded near $77,257 after retreating from the $82,000 resistance area and returning toward its daily order block.

    On the 24-hour charts, $BTC price continued holding above the $76,500 support, keeping the demand structure intact despite the recent price pullback.

    Furthermore, the RSI indicator provided additional context after cooling rapidly from its earlier overbought conditions. The indicator’s latest reading stood at 55.02, while the RSI average signal remained higher at 63.71.

    Despite the fact that the buying strength had cooled, the RSI indicator still stayed above the neutral 50 level as $BTC defended the order block.

    A decisive defense of the $76,500 support could encourage another recovery toward $82,000, especially if institutional demand persists.

    Alternatively, a loss of that support would weaken the structure and increase the probability of a deeper price correction.

    Source: TradingView

    Final Summary

    • Persistent spot outflows reduced exchange supply as institutional Bitcoin accumulation continued.
    • $BTC held its order block, keeping $82,000 firmly in focus for recovery.
  • Oscars: Philippines Selects Rafael Manuel’s ‘Filipiñana’ for International Feature Race

    Oscars: Philippines Selects Rafael Manuel’s ‘Filipiñana’ for International Feature Race

    Rafael Manuel’s “Filipiñana” has been chosen as the official entry from the Philippines in the international feature category at the 99th Academy Awards. It was selected from a shortlist of 8 films. 

    The film is written and directed by Manuel and is distributed by Kino Lorber.

    Richard Lorber, chair and CEO of Kino Lorber, said, “From the moment I saw ‘Filipiñana’ at the Sundance Film Festival, I’ve been telling everyone I know that it’s nothing short of a cinematic miracle.” He added, “When you’ve been distributing films for many decades, as I have, it feels like a gift that you can still discover something that truly feels like the future of the form. I am beyond thrilled that Rafael Manuel’s stunning and astounding debut has been chosen as the Philippines’ official Oscar submission and wish to reaffirm Kino Lorber’s commitment to helping it go the distance. ‘Filipiñana’ is already a theatrical hit in North America and our team is poised and ready to work with the film’s producers to translate our ongoing publicity and marketing efforts into a successful awards campaign.”

    The film is set against a backdrop of oppressive heat and drought. The narrative follows Isabel, a 17-year-old from the provinces of the Philippines, who gets a job at a prestigious golf resort.

    Speaking with Variety, Manuel said he felt the golf course was the perfect setting for the film to explore societal inequities in the country. With the very first courses established on American military bases, the local elite eventually took over, making the golf course a center of power.

    “When you think about it, it’s a good metaphor for the country in that it’s very large and situated on a very fertile plot of land that’s toiled on and worked on by so many people, but ultimately enjoyed and profited from by only a select few.” That, Manuel said, illustrates the class divide that has been so ingrained in the Philippines.

    The international feature selections can be found here.

  • Harry Styles reveals Argentinians CA7RIEL & Paco Amoroso are joining his tour

    CA7RIEL & Paco Amoroso are on their Free Spirits World Tour until November, but they’ll be hitting the state again in 2027 for one of the biggest milestones of their career. On Thursday, Harry Styles dropped the dates for his Together, Together 2027 tour, and fans quickly noticed the Argentine duo’s name. 

    CA7RIEL and Paco Amoroso are one of the most unique acts in music right now© Getty
    CA7RIEL and Paco Amoroso are one of the most unique acts in music right now

    Styles will be in six cities on the North American leg of the global stadium tour before heading to Europe. CA7RIEL & Paco Amoroso will be joining them on April 9 and April 10 for their shows in Dallas, Texas, at AT&T Stadium. 

    Harry Styles is hitting the road with the help of some friends© Getty
    Harry Styles is hitting the road with the help of some friends
    You may also like

    Continue reading

    Who are CA7RIEL & Paco Amoroso?

    The duo met in first grade after sitting next to eachother by chance © Redferns
    The duo met in first grade after sitting next to eachother by chance

    The duo, often mistaken for brothers due to their shared surname, consists of Catriel Guerreiro (aka Ca7riel) and Ulises Guerriero (aka Paco Amoroso). They met way back in primary school when they were six.

    Catriel said in an interview with Arte that they sat next to each other. “It was first grade. Just one of those f***ing coincidences in life; we ended up sitting next to each other,” he explained.

    Since the beginning, people thought they were siblings, and they started trolling together immediately. “The teacher was taking attendance and said, ‘Okay, Ulises Guerriero?’ He raised his hand. ‘Catriel Guerreiro.’ I raised my hand. “Oh, are you brothers?” she asked. And we said yes,” he said.

    CA7RIEL & Paco Amoroso performs on stage at Movistar Arena on May 28, 2025 in Madrid, Spain© Getty
    CA7RIEL & Paco Amoroso performs on stage at Movistar Arena on May 28, 2025 in Madrid, Spain

    They sat in music workshops together, one strumming guitar, the other violin, eventually forming a rock band called Astor y las Flores de Marte in 2010. They officially became a duo in 2018, shifting into the experimental-trap/funk/hip-hop/pop world, and are among the first wave of Urban musicians in Argentina. 

    Now, they’ve practically become blood. “We’re not brothers, but we’re basically brothers,” Catriel told Arte. 

    They dropped their debut studio album, Baño María, in April 2024. But everything changed when they lit up the international scene with their viral Tiny Desk session, released on October 4, 2024, which has garnered over 55 million views at the time of this publication. 

    Riding the wave of success, they went on tour, opened for Kendrick Lamar, and have played at the world’s biggest music festivals, venues, and stadiums.

    LAS VEGAS, NEVADA - NOVEMBER 13: EDITORIAL USE ONLY. (L-R) Ca7riel and Paco Amoroso pose in the press room with the Best Pop Song for "El Día del Amigo", Best Alternative Song for "#Tetas", Best Alternative Music Album for "Papota", Best Short-Form Music Video for "#Tetas" and Best Long-Form Music Video for "Papota" during The 26th Annual Latin GRAMMY Awards at MGM Grand Garden Arena on November 13, 2025 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo by Arturo Holmes/Getty Images)
    The artists won 5 Latin GRAMMYS

    In 2025, they were the stars of the show at the Latin GRAMMYS. Tied with Mexican legend Edgar Barrera for the second most nominations after Bad Bunny, they won 5 awards at the Latin GRAMMY Premiere Ceremony:  Best Alternative Song, Best Long Form Music Video, Best Alternative Music Album, Best Short Form Music Video, and Best Pop Song. They also made out.  

    Paco Amoroso and CA7RIEL© Getty
    They won their first GRAMMY in February

    Then, they won their first Grammy Award for Best Latin Rock or Alternative Album for their EP PAPOTA at the 68th Grammy Awards on February 1, 2026.

  • WLFI rallies while traders hold a negative sentiment – Why is volume rising?

    WLFI rallies while traders hold a negative sentiment – Why is volume rising?

    World Liberty Financial [$WLFI] has been buzzing in the past 24 hours, and traders backed that up notably as trading volume scaled significantly.

    CoinGlass reported that the volume across the Spot and perpetual markets crossed over $196.23 million. The volume surge, alongside price, often implies that sentiment is strong and the bullish outlook is likely to continue in the near term.

    At the time of this writing, the price had crossed over 18% as well. In fact, this marks its largest positive growth yet in the market, with the past seven days and 30 days remaining on the lower side of the market.

    Binance volume has a strong impact

    The most significant impact on $WLFI has been linked to the flow coming in from Binance.

    According to CoinMarketCap, across all exchanges, including centralized and decentralized exchanges, Binance controls roughly 15.74% of the share of volume.

    Source: CoinMarketCap

    Market analysis of the perpetual market volume and the share carried by each exchange shows that across multiple venues, leading exchanges, including Binance, MEXC, Hyperliquid, and others, had more long volume than short volume during that period, with more than 50% of trades taking a long position.

    The surge in long volume across exchanges hints at where traders are dominantly edging toward, which could ultimately impact price further.

    Source: CoinGlass

    More long-side bets in motion

    There has been a surge in the concentration of capital on the long side, studying the Funding Rate. The Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate shows that traders have placed more capital on the long side of the market.

    Press-time data indicated that the OI Funding Rate in the market reached 0.0085%, indicating that there has been more buying-side capital in the market.

    Source: CoinGlass

    The Open Interest has, in fact, been on the rise, recording somewhere around 12% in capital inflow and peaking at $245.10 million at the time of this analysis.

    Capital flow rising alongside the Funding Rate remaining positive could imply that traders are now funding the market as they anticipate a bullish outlook in the near term.

    Fee generation rising

    On-chain, the amount of fees generated by the protocol remains net positive as well.

    DeFiLlama data shows that there has been a surge in fees, reaching a high of $386,000 in the past day, a level last reached on the 14th of July, when it last traded there months ago.

    The surge in fees is a reflection of usage of the protocol and, oftentimes, contributes to the overall utility and positive outlook linked to price.

    Source: CoinMarketCap

    Though the outlook remains positive, the sentiment indicator is turning negative. This implies that investors in the market have not fully caught wind of the rally or believe the price is overvalued presently.

    For now, while the directional bias in the market is bullish, there needs to be consideration for the performance, weighed against the present sentiment.


    Final Summary

    • $WLFI surged 18% as Spot and perpetual trading volume crossed $196.23 million, while Binance led a broader rise in long-side activity.

    • Positive Funding Rate, rising Open Interest and $386,000 in daily fees support the bullish outlook despite weakening sentiment.

  • Trans Pregnancy Drama ‘Aman’ Boards Parallax Films for Global Sales Ahead of Toronto and London Premieres (EXCLUSIVE)

    Trans Pregnancy Drama ‘Aman’ Boards Parallax Films for Global Sales Ahead of Toronto and London Premieres (EXCLUSIVE)

    International sales company Parallax Films has boarded “Aman,” writer-director Rahul Roye’s short film about a trans man who discovers he is pregnant on the eve of his gender-affirming surgery, for worldwide sales.

    The announcement comes ahead of the film’s world premiere in the Short Cuts competition at the Toronto Film Festival, after which it travels to the BFI London Film Festival for its European premiere in that festival’s competition section, which selects 10 shorts from across the world.

    Parallax Films is an international sales agent rooted in Sinophone cinema with teams based in Asia and Europe, focused on bringing high-quality Asian films to the global market.

    Parallax founder Liuying Cao said: “‘Aman’ is an ambitious film, yet one deeply grounded in human emotion. It touches upon the most intimate experiences of an individual life, while never losing sight of the social and political realities – and responsibilities – that those experiences carry. Rather than resorting to slogans, the film reaches the audience through pain that is visceral, embodied, and deeply human. We are especially thrilled to be collaborating with such a beautiful and moving queer film from India.”

    The 16-minute film, a U.K.-U.S.-India-France co-production shot in the Hindi and Bengali languages, had previously unveiled Nikkhil Advani and Dominique Welinski as executive producers. It is produced by Apoorva Bakshi for Awedacious Originals, Elle León Nostas for Aymara Films, Neeraj Churi for Lotus Visual Productions, and Tushar Tyagi and Abid Aziz Merchant.

    The producers said in a joint statement: “‘Parallax Films brings a rare combination of global sales expertise and a deeply bespoke approach to every film they represent. With ‘Aman,’ we wanted a partner who could hold our sensitive and layered film with gentle hands, protecting what makes it intimate and singular while being ambitious and precise about how it is positioned for the world. Their instinct for both the film and its audience made the partnership feel immediate, and we’re thrilled to have them champion ‘Aman’ internationally.”

    The cast includes Kabir Maan, a transgender activist making his acting debut in the title role, opposite Sirat Taneja, Guntaj Deep Singh and Satakshi Nandy. Taneja previously appeared at Toronto in Deepa Mehta’s documentary “I Am Sirat.”

    “‘Aman’ is my attempt to create space for bodies and identities that refuse simplification. Pregnancy is one of the most deeply gendered experiences in our societies – ritualized, politicized and controlled. By placing a trans man at its center, the film questions how fragile our definitions of gender can be. Ultimately, it is a film about becoming,” Roye said.

    “Aman” is supported by the Sumitra Gupta Foundation for the Arts, the Keshav Suri Foundation and the Kashish Q Drishti Film Grant, presented by the Kashish Arts Foundation, with additional support from Renuka Shahane and Lotus Visual Productions. The film marks Roye’s third short, following “Man & Wife” and “A Lullaby for Yellow Roses.”

  • Teen rescued after clinging to boat for two days off Alaska

    Teen rescued after clinging to boat for two days off Alaska

    A 15-year-old boy was miraculously rescued after spending two days clinging to his capsized boat in Alaska’s Bering Sea. His older brother and cousin died when their small boat overturned while they were fishing for their community.