Blog

  • Al Jazeera probe exposes fake viewing numbers for Israeli counter-film

    Al Jazeera probe exposes fake viewing numbers for Israeli counter-film

    An Al Jazeera investigation has exposed holes in claims that an Israeli counter-film to the acclaimed documentary NAZA achieved more than 44 million views. By examining domain registries, web archives, source code, and three independent traffic tools, the investigation exposed the fabricated numbers adopted by official Israeli entities to promote the film.

    The original award-winning film, NAZA, draws on testimony from 24 unnamed Israeli military whistleblowers, accusing the army of using artificial intelligence-powered targeting systems to kill numerous civilians in Gaza. The documentary takes its name from the Israeli military term for civilian casualties expected in air strikes. After winning the special jury prize at the Venice International Film Festival and receiving a historic 25-minute standing ovation, the film was scheduled to screen in 56 countries.

    Official backlash

    The success of the original documentary triggered a political storm in Israel. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu demanded that the chief of general staff, the head of the Shin Bet, and the attorney general launch a comprehensive investigation into the participants and prosecute them for information security violations.

    The film’s directors, Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, were accused of treason, and Netanyahu and Culture Minister Miki Zohar threatened to revoke their Israeli citizenship.

    Network of domains

    To counter the film’s global resonance, opponents created a counter-film. On September 16, just days after NAZA premiered, the domain nazadocumentary.com was registered via Cloudflare, with the owner’s details hidden.

    The Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine revealed the site initially disguised itself as the official NAZA website, listing the directors’ names and information on screenings and press. However, it described the film as exposing the systems behind the calculated mass killing of terrorists in Gaza. By September 30, this deceptive page vanished, replaced by a new title, “NAZA: The Real Story”.

    The individuals behind the 49-minute counter-film are Ariel Averbuch, Roy Danino, and Hagai Gutman, who claimed the work was self-funded. Later, two more domains, whatisnaza.com and watchnaza.com, were registered to redirect users to the counter-film.

    The fake counter

    By the morning of October 14, the nazadocumentary.com website’s counter displayed 43,758,421 views, without disclosing the source of the number or how it was calculated.

    Public platforms told a drastically different story. The full 49-minute version of the film on its official YouTube channel had not exceeded 130,000 views by the same date. This means the website’s counter displayed roughly 336 times the actual viewership. The YouTube channel had fewer than 2,000 subscribers, and the film’s account on X had only 170 followers.

    Independent traffic analysis platforms confirmed the discrepancy. The US-based platform Semrush estimated the site’s total visits by October 8 at about half a million. Israeli-founded Similarweb estimated only 326 visits for September. Furthermore, the film’s domains were absent from the Tranco list of the world’s top one million visited domains.

    Data from the web analytics platform Semrush shows that 80 percent of the website's initial visits originated from Israel. [Semrush]
    Data from the web analytics platform Semrush shows that 80 percent of the website’s initial visits originated from Israel. [Semrush]
    Semrush analytics reveal that direct links were the primary traffic source for the Israeli counter-film's website in October. [Semrush]
    Semrush analytics reveal that direct links were the primary traffic source for the Israeli counter-film’s website in October. [Semrush]

    Discrepancies and code

    An examination of the page’s source code revealed that the element displaying the huge number was internally tagged as “visitors” but displayed to users as “views”. The number is delivered directly from the site’s server, making its calculation method invisible from the outside. Upon opening the page, the counter begins at 97 percent of its value and counts up for three seconds, creating the illusion of a live counter.

    Additionally, the site collects actual viewing data without publishing it, sending a “watch-tracker” file after about 25 seconds of video playback to identify the viewing session and parts watched, leaving it unknown whether the counter is based on this data.

    Despite the seemingly fabricated metrics, official Israeli accounts spearheaded the promotion of the counter-film. The Israeli Embassy in Washington promoted it on October 3 on social media.

    Tzipi Hotovely, head of Israel’s National Public Diplomacy Directorate, awarded the three creators certificates of recognition for countering the original film. Hotovely said the film had garnered tens of millions of views, transforming an unsupported, fabricated number into an official talking point.

    This elaborate digital campaign unfolds against the backdrop of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza, which began in October 2023. Since the conflict started, Israel has killed at least 74,000 Palestinians, including at least 21,000 children, according to Gaza’s Ministry of Health.

  • Morning Minute: Solana Is About To Get Faster

    Morning Minute: Solana Is About To Get Faster

    Morning Minute is a daily newsletter written by Tyler Warner. The analysis and opinions expressed are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of Decrypt. And check out our daily news show ‘FOMO HOUR’ covering all of the top stories and market action.

    GM!

    Today’s top news:

    • Crypto majors fall 3-5% after hot CPI; BTC at $80.9k
    • Over $900M liquidated as crypto majors selloff; alts down 5-15%
    • Solana sets Oct 21 for Alpenglow on mainnet
    • Papertrade flips Circle in daily revenue with $7.5M
    • Kalshi says state-level oversight would drive prediction markets offshore

    BitcoinBTC · USD

    $82,357+0.67%

    Oct 8Oct 10Oct 12Oct 14Oct 15

    $84.2k$82.9k$81.5k$80.2k

    24h HighHigh$82,508

    24h LowLow$79,806

    VolVol$1.8B

    Market projectionsOdds by Myriad

    →

    🏎️ Solana Cuts Finality From 12.8 Seconds to 150 Milliseconds

    Next Wednesday, Solana rips out the engine and drops in a new one while the car is doing 70 on the highway.

    On October 21, around 15:00 UTC, Solana activates Alpenglow on mainnet, retiring the consensus mechanism it has run on since launch. Finality drops from roughly 12.8 seconds to a target of about 150 milliseconds – 85 times faster. Anza, the core dev shop behind it, called it “18 months of work for a migration that happens in one slot.”

    Finality is the moment a transaction stops being reversible, the point where you can hand over the goods knowing the payment can’t be clawed back. Solana has always felt instant, but there was a roughly 13-second window where a block could in theory still get dropped. Every exchange and payment processor has had to build around that window. Next week it closes.

    The old system breaks if more than about a third of staked SOL turns hostile. The new one is built to survive 20% of stake acting maliciously plus another 20% simply offline, and keep finalizing. For a chain whose reputation was built on outages, that’s the number institutions will actually care about.

    Now the part that’s going to cause trouble. Validators currently cast their votes as transactions on the chain. Under Alpenglow they vote directly to each other instead, which means Solana’s headline transaction count and TPS figures are about to fall off a cliff. Nothing real changes – same users, same volume, same apps – but the number everyone has quoted for years was mostly validators voting at each other. Expect a wave of “Solana activity collapses” posts next Wednesday from people reading a dashboard.

    This is also just phase one of two, and the second piece has no date yet. And Solana has missed an Alpenglow date before – a September 28 activation was announced, then pushed. So, grains of salt.

    But clearly Solana is focused on speed as one of its primary differentiators – and it’s about to get a lot faster…

    🌎 Macro Crypto and Markets

    Corporate Treasuries & ETFs

    Meme Coin Tracker

    • Meme leaders were red down 3-5%; DOGE -5%, SHIB -3%, PEPE -6%, PENGU -5%, TRUMP -3%, SPX -4%, BONK -5%
    • Robinhood chain leaders were red down 5-20% reversing their recent gains; Pons -6% to $212M; AI -20% at $80M; Cashcat -18% at $100M; VRAX +40% and Wolfpack +55% led top movers
    • Solana top movers included Dope +100%, Stream +9000%, Nihilism +1200% and Pepper +90%

    💰 Token, Airdrop & Protocol Tracker

    • Papertrade flipped Circle in revenue with $7.5M, highest of all onchain protocols; Hyperliquid was next with $2.64M, then Pump.fun with $2.04M
    • Polygon Labs closed its acquisition of Coinme, picking up 37 state money transmitter licenses, 11 exemptions and FinCEN registration to cover 48 states, and turning its Open Money Stack into a licensed U.S. payments rail

    🚚 What is happening in NFTs?

    • NFT leaders were mostly flat; Punks even at 31.2 ETH, BAYC -1% at 5.45 ETH, Pudgy +2% at 2.42 ETH
    • Yield Field Deeds (+10%), aligndraw (+38%) and Robinpunks (+230%) led top movers

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

    Join 72,000+ readers

  • Zcash Tanks Double Digits After ‘Meteoric Rise’ Sees Leverage Build Up

    Zcash Tanks Double Digits After ‘Meteoric Rise’ Sees Leverage Build Up

    In brief

    • Privacy cryptocurrency Zcash has tanked 11% over the past 24 hours.
    • Luke Nolan, senior researcher at CoinShares, says this drop was likely caused by a build up in leverage after the token’s “meteoric rise” in recent months.
    • Another expert says that growing concerns that AI could break crypto encryption before quantum computers might’ve prompted losses for Zcash.

    Privacy-focused cryptocurrency Zcash has fallen 11% over the past 24 hours to a market capitalization of $18.5 billion, per Decrypt data, making it one of the biggest losers of the day.

    One expert says this drop in valuation comes after its price has soared in recent months, which has led to a build up in leverage and amplified losses. Others say that growing concerns that AI can break cryptography faster than quantum computers are causing the privacy token to take bigger losses.

    Luke Nolan, senior researcher at CoinShares, highlighted that Zcash’s “meteoric rise” means that it is still up 460% from its March lows and that in a “fragile” crypto market the largest gainers tend to take losses too.

    “There was a decent build-up of leverage on the way up as this is also a natural consequence of a strong move,” Nolan told Decrypt. “More attention brings more perp traders to take on leverage, and when there is a sneeze, the moves get amplified as those leveraged traders are either forced to reduce exposure or get liquidated.”

    Over the past 24 hours, per CoinGlass data, $17.9 million worth of Zcash long positions were liquidated, a large figure compared to Hyperliquid’s $7.3 million over the same period.

    The race to quantum-proof Zcash

    The price drop comes as other industry-wide concerns start to swirl, some of which could see positive upside for Zcash.

    Last week, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin and Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake warned that the industry needs to plan for “bunker mode” as AI could break crypto encryption before quantum computers do. The conversation was sparked after OpenAI published major progress in math, which presented concerns for the future of encryption.

    “The OpenAI math breakthroughs has caused a lot concern in crypto given the conspicuous lack of cryptography proofs,” Ryan Zurrer, founder and director of investment firm Dialectic, told Decrypt. “More complex privacy protocols such as Zcash have the most to lose in a zero-day event if core primitives are rendered obsolete against AI-driven cryptography attacks.”

    Zcash has been aggressive with its quest to quantum-proof the network. Zakura, a Zcash full node developer, recently said that its team expects to be quantum-proofed as well as reasonably AI-proofed by January. Its quantum-resistant roadmap “served as a key catalyst” for its recent rally, Tim Sun, senior researcher at HashKey, told Decrypt. “Although actual implementation is still some distance away, it indeed reflects the market’s continuous focus on the privacy sector since the beginning of this year.”

    Privacy continues to be a major crypto industry talking point. Sun added that as traditional finance continues to merge with the crypto industry, the need for privacy will continue to rise.

    “As an increasing volume of traditional financial assets and operations migrate on-chain, privacy protection will no longer be merely an optional add-on,” Sun told Decrypt, “but rather a fundamental prerequisite for financial institutions adopting blockchain technology.”

    Last week, French lawmakers progressed a law proposal that would require citizens to report crypto holdings equal to or above €100,000 ($112,000), or otherwise face a penalty. The proposed law received significant backlash in the wake of a wave of crypto-related “wrench attacks,” robberies, and kidnappings across the country. Although the law hasn’t passed yet, some have looked to privacy protocols as government oversight looms.

    Nolan from CoinShares highlights that investors should zoom out when looking at Zcash’s recent performance, pushing back on recent narratives pushing its price down.

    “I think the French proposed law had little to do with the move, and in my view, it’s simply a larger pullback given the meteoric rise,” Nolan told Decrypt. “When you put the drawdown in context on the daily chart, even though it’s been 35%+, it looks like a blip in comparison to the upmove.”

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

    Join 72,000+ readers

  • Daniel Henney Joins Apple TV’s ‘Disavowed’ (EXCLUSIVE)

    Daniel Henney Joins Apple TV’s ‘Disavowed’ (EXCLUSIVE)

    Daniel Henney has joined the cast of Apple TV’s upcoming action thriller “Disavowed.”

    Per the longline, “Disavowed” follows “legendary CIA case officer Brad Griffin, who is abruptly fired in the middle of a global hunt for an elusive assassin responsible for killing his colleague. Disgraced and outcast from the world of intelligence, all bets are off when Brad decides to go after the 15 million dollar federal bounty on the assassin’s head.”

    Henney joins James Marsden who stars as Brad Griffin, Norman Reedus (“The Walking Dead”) and Bokeem Woodbine (FX’s “Fargo”). Henney will play Jae Chun, a successful attorney to high-profile figures.

    Henney’s previous works include starring as Lan Mandragoran opposite Rosamund Pike in Prime Video’s “The Wheel of Time.” The American actor got his start in Korea with the 2005 romantic comedy-drama “My Lovely Sam-Soon.” He later starred in “Criminal Minds: Beyond Borders” and “Criminal Minds.” His film credits include “Missing, X-Men Origins: Wolverine” and “Big Hero 6,” in which he voiced Tadashi Hamada. He also voices Jinn in the English version of the Netflix series “Genie, Make a Wish.”

    The “Disavowed” series was originally announced back in May with Marsden in the lead role. The release date is yet to be announced. It is created and executive produced by Art Marcum and Matt Holloway. Tom Spezialy and Marsden will also executive produce. Blue Marble Pictures produces, with Theresa Kang and Caroline Garity serving as executive producers. Apple Studios will also produce.

    Henney is represented by Buchwald, More Medavoy Management and Toczek Suddleson Law Group.

  • Verve Signs 10-Year Lease for Hollywood Headquarters (EXCLUSIVE)

    Verve Signs 10-Year Lease for Hollywood Headquarters (EXCLUSIVE)

    Verve has signed a new 10-year lease for its worldwide headquarters in the Hollywood Media District, marking a significant commitment to the Los Angeles entertainment economy.

    Located across from Sunset Las Palmas Studios, Verve’s HQ is situated alongside companies including Netflix, All3Media, Formosa Group, Paramount, SiriusXM and Roc Nation.

    Verve commissioned global design collective RIOS to design a headquarters that reflects the agency’s independent culture and ambitions. Its ground-floor theater serves as a meeting place for screenings, press events, conversations with executives and filmmakers and other industry and community programming.

    “As the only major talent agency headquartered in Hollywood, we’re proud to deepen our commitment to the Hollywood Media District,” said Verve cofounding partners Adam Levine and Bryan Besser. “This is where the creative process comes to life, among the people whose imagination, creativity and craft make Hollywood what it is. Intentionally making Verve’s long-term home here reflects who we are as advocates for creative talent invested in the future of our industry and the community that drives it. This investment launches Verve’s next decade with the mandate that has defined us from the start: to deliver truly client-first representation built around each client’s individuality and ambition.”

    Founded in 2010, Verve is an independent talent and literary agency with operational divisions spanning motion picture literary, television literary, talent, non-fiction, media rights & publishing, Verve Ventures, commercial endorsements and digital. Verve clients include actors like Matthew Lillard, Keith David, Sean Bean, Olivia Thirlby and Eliza Coupe and filmmakers like Sara Hess, Ben Leonberg, Zeb Wells and Adam Stein.

  • ‘The Mummy 4’ With Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz Officially Titled ‘The Mummy: The Book of the Dead’

    ‘The Mummy 4’ With Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz Officially Titled ‘The Mummy: The Book of the Dead’

    Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz’s fourth “Mummy” adventure has a new title: “The Mummy: The Book of the Dead.”

    Fraser and Weisz are reprising their roles as Rick and Evie O’Connell alongside a cast that includes John Hannah, Michael Johnston, Numan Acar, Kevin J. O’Connor and Oded Fehr. Plot details haven’t been revealed. As previously announced, Universal is releasing the movie in theaters on Oct. 15, 2027.

    The actors first shared the screen in 1999’s blockbuster hit “The Mummy,” which follows a treasure hunter who accidentally awakens a cursed Egyptian priest with supernatural powers. A reboot of one of Universal’s classic creature features, the movie spawned two sequels, 2001’s “The Mummy Returns” and 2008’s “The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor,” as well as the 2002 spinoff “The Scorpion King” with Dwayne Johnson. While Fraser starred in both “The Mummy Returns” and “Tomb of the Dragon Emperor,” Weisz wasn’t in the third movie in the series.

    Filmmakers Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett, who call themselves Radio Silence, are directing the fourth chapter in the decades-old action franchise, from a screenplay by David Coggeshall. Bettinelli-Olpin and Gillett are best known for 2019’s “Ready or Not” and reviving the “Scream” franchise for Paramount in 2022, while Coggeshall’s credits include “The Family Plan” and “Orphan: First Kill.”

    Sean Daniel will produce the fourquel, having worked on the last five films in the franchise, including 2017’s reboot with Tom Cruise. (That attempt to revive the property was a critical and commercial disaster, effectively ending the studio’s ambitions to craft an interconnected Dark Universe.)

    Other producers include William Sherak, James Vanderbilt and Paul Neinstein of Project X Entertainment, and Clayton Townsend. Fraser and Hivemind’s Jason F. Brown will serve as executive producers on “The Mummy: The Book of the Dead.”

  • Inside Galaxy’s $100M Commitment to Sky Ecosystem for sUSDS

    Inside Galaxy’s $100M Commitment to Sky Ecosystem for sUSDS

    Market Snapshot

    Currently, SkyEcosystem’s price remains stagnant with no significant volume reported, reflecting the cautious nature of the market. However, the announcement of Galaxy’s investment may attract attention from traders looking for opportunities within the blockchain sector. This could lead to increased activity around SkyEcosystem as institutional backing often signals confidence in a project’s future.

    SkyEcosystem is known for its innovative blockchain solutions and their Peg Stability Module, which facilitates efficient currency swaps. Galaxy’s investment reflects their recognition of SkyEcosystem’s potential and aligns with their broader strategy to engage with emerging technologies in the financial sector.

    Key Levels to Watch

    Traders should keep an eye on the developments stemming from this partnership, particularly how it may influence SkyEcosystem’s adoption in the market. The upcoming weeks might reveal how institutional interest translates into tangible growth or price movement for SkyEcosystem. Additionally, monitoring Galaxy’s further strategic moves could provide insights into the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency investments.

    This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

  • Arthur Hayes Says, “The AI Bubble Will Burst, Bitcoin Will Soar,” and Gives a Date

    Arthur Hayes Says, “The AI Bubble Will Burst, Bitcoin Will Soar,” and Gives a Date

    According to Arthur Hayes, the Critical Date is the End of 2027

    Hayes believes that about two-thirds of the investment cycle in the AI sector has been completed, and the real turning point could occur at the end of 2027 or the beginning of 2028.

    According to Hayes, large AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are committing to purchasing hundreds of billions or even trillions of dollars worth of computing capacity. However, it remains unclear whether these companies will have the financial strength to repay these investments once their data centers are completed.

    Hayes, particularly highlighting the imbalance between the revenues and operating costs of AI companies, argued in the Anthropic example that when training and inference costs are taken into account, approximately $3 is spent for every $1 of revenue.

    Hayes stated that demand for AI services might not remain at current levels once the true costs are passed on to consumers. He argued that this could jeopardize the financial sustainability of the massive investments made in data centers.

    Related News Two Major Partnerships from Ripple (XRP) on the Same Day: Big Announcements Have Come

    Why Bitcoin Could Profit From This Crisis?

    Hayes’ optimism towards Bitcoin is based on the monetary expansion policies that governments and central banks could implement in response to a potential financial crisis.

    Hayes argued that the current US debt structure is unsustainable and suggested that officials may eventually have to sacrifice the value of the currency to keep bond yields under control.

    He pointed out that a crisis in France’s debt market could similarly trigger a large bailout package.

    Hayes also argued that in economies with high debt burdens, interest rate increases may not always suppress inflation as expected. According to Hayes, rising interest rates can increase demand for financial assets by providing government bond holders with more interest income.

    The renowned investor believes this mechanism is one of the factors explaining the increases in Bitcoin’s price.

    According to Hayes’ scenario, a major financial collapse in the AI sector, while initially causing significant market fluctuations, could be followed by monetary expansion that provides a strong source of liquidity for cryptocurrency markets.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • At the White House, crypto policy vacancy looms large

    A White House official told CoinDesk on Thursday that Witt’s work was appreciated and wished him “the best of luck in the future endeavors.” The official didn’t comment on who would be taking over.

    “Crypto and Clarity Act will continue to be a priority for the president,” the official said.

    The White House’s digital assets policy work was never a large operation, but the advisers were highly vocal at times, and their presence could put an important administrative stamp on crypto goals. The effort began several weeks before Trump returned to office in 2025, when the president-elect named David Sacks, the former PayPal executive, as his incoming AI and crypto czar.

    Trump also tapped a little-known former college football player, Bo Hines, to be the first director of the digital assets advisory council — at first a one-person effort, but eventually adding a deputy. Hines quickly became the crypto face of the White House, taking constant meetings with crypto insiders and appearing on event stages. And his brief tenure of about eight months concluded with a major win for the industry in Congress: the passage of the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins ($GENIUS) Act into law.

  • Nvidia RTX Spark: Everything You Need to Know Before Our First Tests

    Nvidia RTX Spark: Everything You Need to Know Before Our First Tests

    After months of waiting, Nvidia’s RTX Spark has officially landed. We’ve been waiting since the first announcements at Computex, eagerly waiting to see how Nvidia would reshape the laptop field with its “Grace Blackwell” architecture, pumping up the humble Windows laptop with workstation-grade power for AI, packaged into lightweight Windows laptops that can pick up and go. (At least, that’s the promise.)

    The first wave of RTX Spark laptops are expensive machines, to be sure, but RTX Spark is a major shift for engineers and AI enthusiasts. This is far more than a modest CPU or NPU refresh. By combining Arm processing, powerful Blackwell RTX graphics, and up to 128GB of coherent unified memory into a single architecture, Nvidia and Microsoft are giving users the power for local AI, and challenging the dominant cloud providers of current AI tools. It’s a new hardware platform, a new category of laptop, and the first of many Windows machines built with agentic AI in mind.

    With this hardware, Nvidia and Microsoft are aggressively redefining mobile computing and setting the stage for the next decade of personal technology. I spent a couple of days in San Francisco with Microsoft and Nvidia to get the lowdown on Spark and Windows. So let’s dig into the details of the new platform, the silicon that makes it tick, and the implications RTX Spark has for users and the laptops of tomorrow.

    Microsoft Unveils New Surface Laptop Ultra and New AI Agents

    PCMag Logo

    Microsoft Unveils New Surface Laptop Ultra and New AI Agents


    Benchmarking and Ecosystem Context: Where RTX Spark Fits 

    For all their traditional laptop design and rich features, it’s important to remember that RTX Spark laptops are essentially a new platform for Windows machines. It’s built on Arm, and while Windows on Arm is already a thing thanks to the partnership between Microsoft and Qualcomm (the partnership behind the last few generations of Surface devices), Nvidia brings so much more to the equation: powerful graphics, beefier compute, and rich capabilities for local AI and agentic tools. Qualcomm paved the road, but Nvidia is driving a supercomputer down it.

    So it’s worth revisiting what an AI PC is and how it has evolved from simple “classic” laptops with an NPU to encompass a range of systems at all levels of power.

    RTX Spark laptops from various manufacturers

    (Credit: Brian Westover)

    At the basic level, mainstream AI PCs, such as Copilot+ laptops, go beyond the traditional CPU and GPU to add a neural processing unit called the NPU. The NPU offers separate parallelized processing hardware specifically for machine learning and AI functions. Current requirements have mainstream AI PCs producing 40 to 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), which is sufficient for small models for simple summarization, language translation, captioning, and background processes like webcam image improvements. It’s not enough to power full-scale local inference, and even what can run on those machines runs relatively slowly, bottlenecked by minuscule amounts of RAM and processing power.

    RTX Spark laptops

    (Credit: Brian Westover)

    The next level up are traditional x86 gaming systems and mobile workstations. These machines bring dedicated mobile GPU hardware into the equation, which also brings more capable parallel processing and the ability to use VRAM as dedicated memory for loading a model and maintaining context through a conversation or task. The higher wattage and improved thermal management help deliver some legitimate on-device AI capability, but again, we’re still constrained by the amount of local memory and the fact that the hardware is not optimized for AI tasks. So even when you can run AI tools on the machine, they compete for resources anytime you try to multitask AI workloads and the use of another app.

    The third category of AI PCs: dedicated AI developer boxes. That’s traditionally meant desktops like the Nvidia DGX Spark, the AMD Ryzen AI Halo, and even larger desktop AI machines like the Nvidia DGX Station, which generally have no consumer market and are purely for enterprise and business users.

    RTX Spark straddles the line between gaming and workstation systems and dedicated AI developer machines. They have the form factor of a workstation, the power efficiency of a mainstream AI PC, and the power and unified memory needed for a developer machine. That all translates into an extremely capable, surprisingly portable, and efficient machine, but it also introduces all sorts of new complexities for those of us who test and evaluate laptops.


    All About the Nvidia N1X: SoC Architecture and Hardware Specs

    Nvidia RTX Spark is an evolution of the same Grace Blackwell architecture in the Nvidia DGX Spark developer desktop, which Nvidia describes as a desktop supercomputer capable of petaflop performance.

    Nvidia RTX Spark chipshot and features

    (Credit: Nvidia)

    The N1X chip is fabricated by TSMC on a 3-nanometer process node, and the SoC can scale between 45 watts and 80 watts TDP. That means that it can deliver power to run high-parameter AI models within the confines of an ultraportable laptop as thin as 0.55 inch and weighing as little as 3 pounds. On top of this, the new architecture also maintains consistent performance, whether powered off a wall outlet or a laptop battery, with Nvidia promising 99% of plugged-in performance on the battery.

    On the die, the Grace Blackwell architecture connects a Grace CPU and Blackwell GPU using a dedicated bidirectional interconnect called NVLink-C2C (chip-to-chip). Rated for 600GB-per-second of bandwidth, it enables low-latency, cache-coherent communication across the compute dies, eliminating traditional PCI Express bus bottlenecks and allowing them to address the same unified memory space simultaneously without redundant memory copies. That also gives it a massive advantage over traditional Intel laptop architecture, whether that’s comparing a CPU with integrated graphics or a more powerful system with a dedicated GPU.

    The Grace CPU: Arm-Native Multithreading

    When you get down to the core silicon, the Grace CPU is built on Arm architecture, with Arm Cortex-X925 performance cores and Arm Cortex-A725 efficiency cores. This architecture has a lot in common with Apple’s M-series chips, which also are built on Arm technology, with a mix of high-performance and energy-efficient cores.

    Nvidia Grace CPU tile anatomy

    (Credit: Nvidia)

    The Nvidia RTX Spark N1X chip is the official name of this first-generation product, but the name actually applies to two different chips: an 18-core version that features nine performance cores and nine efficiency cores, and a 20-core version with 10 performance cores and 10 efficiency cores. It would be a little less confusing if Nvidia didn’t call both of these the “N1X” chip, or added some sort of modifier to the name, but it’s not the first time we’ve encountered this sort of confusing naming scheme for chips. Apple’s M-series chips are guilty of this, too. (Apple makes different versions of the M5 chip, distinguished by core counts on the CPU and GPU.)

    The Grace CPU also supports  Windows Workload Profile Scheduling (WPS), which distributes multithreaded tasks dynamically across performance and efficiency cores to optimize power scaling.

    The Blackwell RTX GPU: Tiered Muscle, Unified Memory

    Another part of the SoC equation is the Blackwell RTX GPU, and like the CPU, it comes in two hardware tiers. The flagship model has 6,144 CUDA cores and 192 fifth-generation Tensor Cores. The step-down model has a scaled-down Blackwell chip with 5,120 CUDA cores (and possibly fewer in future configurations). The other major difference is in memory support. The top Blackwell RTX chip supports up to 128GB of LPDDR5X memory, while the step-down model supports 16GB to 64GB of memory.

    Nvidia Blackwell GPU tile and tech

    (Credit: Nvidia)

    Ultimately, the split between the two chip variants is confusing, because it also translates into a difference in AI performance that scales proportionally with the core count. At the moment, the version of the chip with 6,144 CUDA cores delivers up to 1 petaflop of FP4 precision, employing 45 to 80 watts of power, which is configurable. The step-down model may not deliver the full processing muscle that the flagship model does.

    Here’s the full spec breakdown for the two N1X chips:

    The Memory Subsystem: Shattering Mobile VRAM Limits

    Beyond the two tiers of the N1X chip, something else will determine RTX Spark’s power potential: the memory allocation.

    RTX Spark’s unified memory subsystem operates over a 256-bit, 16-channel memory interface, rated by Nvidia for speeds up to 9,400MBps. That works out to a peak unified memory bandwidth of up to 300GBps.

    Compare that with normal gaming and workstation laptops. They’ll use a dedicated GPU and discrete VRAM, and will be generally capped at 24GB of VRAM. (You’d see that in a high-end laptop with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 mobile GPU.) The CPU works in concert with its own system RAM, while the GPU operates hand in hand with this independent, fast pool of VRAM, made up of dedicated GDDR7.

    In contrast, on the Nvidia RTX Spark, you are instead working with up to 128GB of unified LPDDR5X in one big pool, directly accessible by the CPU and GPU. For local AI, that gives the RTX Spark an undeniable advantage. Allocation tools let you partition the unified memory dynamically between CPU and GPU, but on the 128GB model, you can devote up to 96GB to GPU access, allowing larger shared page sizes to accelerate big data processing. It also enables you to host massive models locally, which is essential for high-quality performance and agentic tools.

    That said, that 128GB configuration is at the extreme high end of RTX Spark systems. Configurations with that amount are currently projected to run about $6,000; smaller RTX Spark memory configurations, like the 32GB and 64GB versions that will be popping up on store shelves at places like Best Buy, are significantly more affordable and can run complex reasoning models at smaller sizes.

    The RTX Spark NPU: Copilot+ Compliance and Power Efficiency

    One more thing worth mentioning as we discuss the chip architecture in RTX Spark is the inclusion of a dedicated low-power neural processing unit, or NPU.

    The RTX Spark’s NPU is a unique offering, not the same as in the equivalent DGX Spark Linux boxes that Nvidia has been selling over the last year and a half. The addition of an NPU is specific to the Windows laptops that RTX Spark is designed for, to meet the 40 TOPS certification threshold for Copilot+ to function. 

    Now, there has been some confusion about whether or not RTX Spark systems actually qualify as Copilot+ machines themselves, or whether that branding will even continue going forward, now that RTX Spark is redefining what an AI PC can be. However, Microsoft has clarified that RTX Spark laptops are indeed Copilot+ machines. Features like Live Captions, Windows Studio Effects, and other Windows 11 AI-enhanced features like Windows Recall will either be available at launch or rolling out in the coming months. Microsoft says that some of these things will be available this year under the Windows Insider Program, while others will not be deployed until 2027.


    The Windows on Arm Factor

    Aside from chip architecture, RTX Spark also raises system-level questions around Windows on Arm and system-level integrations. Nvidia and Microsoft pulled the curtain back on some of these at their RTX Spark event, but since then, as I’ve been through technical briefings with Nvidia and various laptop manufacturers, we’ve learned even more. Here’s a quick rundown of some the salient points.

    Workload Profile Scheduling 

    Chief among these is WPS. On a standard PC, the system treats all tasks more or less the same, sending them to different processor cores largely based on what’s open, with some degree of nuance as it handles performance cores versus efficiency cores. But with a complex chip like the RTX Spark, which features an Arm CPU, a dedicated NPU, and a massive number of Blackwell Tensor cores, basic scheduling systems would cause lag and burn through your battery life. WPS solves this with real-time matching of the task and the necessary processing hardware.

    Now, some of these things are already in use on other platforms. Intel chips employ Thread Director, which performs hardware-level scheduling on those chips. Microsoft optimized the Windows kernel scheduler for RTX Spark’s Grace CPU layout, dynamically distributing multithreaded compute, background-agent processes, and foreground interactive applications across performance cores and efficiency cores to optimize performance per watt.

    Adaptive Unified Memory Addressing and Page Enhancements

    Windows memory management also has adaptive unified memory addressing. That removes the traditional fixed boundaries between VRAM and RAM, using an adaptive memory ceiling to dynamically allocate different portions of the up to 128GB of system memory as workloads expand. Both of these technologies are more important than ever when using agentic tools, which run in the background while you work on other tasks on your system. This dynamic distribution and adaptive-processing memory management are part of what makes that background agentic use possible without you suffering a performance hit.

    Another kernel-level management tool is around handling shared memory regions. Demanding AI models and complex creative datasets use larger memory pages (that is, the amount of data immediately available in RAM), and enhancements here, according to Nvidia, reduce translation buffering and give developers more granular control over memory traffic on both CPU and GPU. It’s not something you’ll probably ever encounter as an end user. But it does play directly into the seamless experience you’ll have using the system for productivity and content creation while also using AI tools, because it keeps everything running smoothly.

    Microsoft Execution Containers (MXC)

    (Credit: Brian Westover)

    A Sandbox for AI Agents: Microsoft Execution Containers (MXC)

    Perhaps the biggest broad change that Microsoft brings to the table for Nvidia RTX Spark is Microsoft Execution Containers (MXC). This is essentially a set of boundaries, at the OS execution level, that provide process- and section-level isolation for autonomous AI agent workloads. 

    MXC sets up strict rules around file access and network resources in the runtime without the heavy performance and power overhead of a full virtual machine. This is a really big step forward in enabling agentic tools on consumer systems, with a level of safety that protects your local data and hardware from a misbehaving or improperly set up agentic tool.

    Independent Agent Identity Attribution

    Microsoft is also adding to Windows something called Independent Agent Identity Attribution. This isolates agent activity from human user sessions, essentially setting up an agent as a separate user on the machine, but with different access permissions. This allows you to use background agents without having to worry that a wayward AI hallucination might turn into a damaging command that gets attributed to you, and it also reins in the agent by not giving it full user or admin access to everything available on the machine. It essentially hands the agent safety scissors to get things done, allowing it to do work without damaging anything in your name.


    So Wait, Who Is RTX Spark Actually Meant For?

    At this point, you might be asking yourself, “Who are these machines actually made for?” That’s a fair question.

    Developers and AI Engineers

    First and foremost, these machines are built for AI, specifically developers and AI engineers. Nvidia RTX Spark hardware offers native CUDA runtime locally and puts AI prototyping and agentic work into a laptop form factor. Up until now, these have been confined to Linux systems and clusters, beefy desktop rigs, and servers that offer private compute in the cloud. 

    That’s great for some use cases, but as AI becomes more common and mainstream, the need for local compute is more important than ever. So first and foremost, this is aimed at developers working on AI tools, and workers and business owners who are leveraging those AI tools and want to keep everything local and secure to protect proprietary information and customer data, or stay on the right side of various data privacy laws.

    List of developer partners

    (Credit: Nvidia)

    Content Creators and Digital Artists

    Content creators will want to take advantage of accelerated media engines and multi-stream video workflows. The giant unified memory translates into massive unified frame buffers for multi-layer generative creative pipelines and rapid scrubbing through large, high-resolution video files. If you are a visual artist, a YouTuber, or even a game designer, these are machines worth looking at.

    Gamers: Windows on Arm Finally Gets Serious

    Gaming in particular adds an interesting dimension to this machine. Though Nvidia and Microsoft have both been keen to emphasize that these are not intended to be just gaming machines, they do offer support for the full RTX stack, with GPU power estimated at being equivalent to an RTX 5070 mobile GPU. (We’ll be testing that.)

    Plus, you get modern ray tracing, DLSS rendering enhancements, and frame generation, along with optimized Prism emulation of traditional PC titles, finally bringing real gaming support and performance to Windows on Arm.

    Gamers will be pleased to know that several game companies are going to be bringing native Arm versions of popular games. One of the hurdles? Anti-cheat technologies. Getting them to run on Arm instead of x86 has been a real stumbling block for Windows gaming outside of Intel and AMD platforms. Nvidia brings a lot of gaming clout to the table, and game companies are already signing up to offer native anti-cheat and in-game support on Arm as a result. This will be a developing area.

    Microsoft Secure platform for agents

    (Credit: Brian Westover)

    Mainstream Power Users and the Local Agentic Frontier

    AI devs and on-the-side gamers are far from the only intended audience for these machines, though. Tech enthusiasts and power users are a major potential market here. These laptops blend power-efficient Arm chips with desktop-class GPU capabilities in thin-and-light designs, providing power that exceeds gaming rigs and workstations in some aspects.

    So, perhaps the most important market for these new RTX Spark laptops is mainstream users who are looking to start using local agentic workflows. The promise of an always-on, local-first intelligent assistant with persistent background agents that execute consistently and reliably has massive appeal to those who want to bring AI capabilities more fully into their day-to-day lives. Being able to do this without relying on a cloud API, dealing with online latency, or paying ongoing subscription costs is also a major selling point, particularly for those in the business world who have already embraced AI tools and agents but are quickly finding the per-token subscription costs hard to swallow.

    Recommended by Our Editors

    Nvidia Nemotron local model

    (Credit: Brian Westover)


    What Local AI and Agentic Computing Look Like in the Age of RTX Spark

    By this point, it should be clear: local AI and agentic computing are the primary use cases for RTX Spark. The hardware’s designed for on-device model execution and inference, with the parallelized computing and high-level performance needed to run large-parameter models locally. Get the biggest allocation of unified memory possible here (128GB), and you should be able to run some of the largest local models available.

    Hermes Agent on RTX Spark

    (Credit: Nvidia)

    The Local Model Landscape

    Need a research assistant? Want to generate a photo or video? LLM-based AI chatbots are well-suited to these types of tasks, and open-source LLMs you can run on an RTX Spark machine could be a solid alternative to cloud-based household names you might already be familiar with, such as ChatGPT and Grok. Nvidia and Microsoft say that many of the already-popular LLMs will work on RTX systems, including Qwen, Llama, Mistral, Stable Diffusion, and Flux.2.  Nvidia also recommends its own Nemotron Bolt, a model specifically optimized for RTX Spark. 

    None of these will match what you can get from a ChatGPT subscription, but many of them come pretty close. And while all of them can run on existing PCs right now, they’ll likely be faster on an RTX Spark machine.

    Autonomous Workflows: Moving Beyond Chatbots

    Now, let’s say that in addition to running ideas past a chatbot, you want to automate some of your workflows. You’d use an agentic tool—something like OpenClaw, Hermes, or Perplexity’s Personal Computer—to do that, but you need even greater processing power than you would for an LLM. Here, RTX Spark delivers again.

    Hermes and Codex on Windows

    (Credit: Brian Westover)

    A large pool of unified memory, no PCIe bottlenecks, and oodles of CUDA cores mean that one of these machines should be able to let agentic tools easily create professional-grade graphics, render 4K videos, and do other compute-intensive tasks.

    Nvidia OpenShell: Lock it Down With an Agentic Security Guard

    Great agentic power requires great guardrails. You wouldn’t want an agentic tool to get tricked by a malicious prompt injection and run amok, deleting all your stuff. Nvidia has a solution for that, the aforementioned OpenShell. By default, it blocks everything, intercepting the agent at the operating system’s kernel level. Until you specify otherwise, it can’t open private folders or access unauthorized websites. OpenShell also provides a safety layer that prevents an agent from ever seeing an actual API password or login token. 

    Accelerating Everyday Creative Workflows

    Many prospective RTX Spark system owners might want something simpler than running local LLMs or agentic AI, though. And the platform can still enable AI accelerations of existing software that requires third-party developer support. Here are just a few glimpses of what you can expect on this front, all exclusive to RTX Spark hardware: 

    Upcoming versions of Adobe Photoshop and Premiere Pro will let you remove unwanted objects from an image, eliminate background humming from an audio track, and adapt a clip’s aspect ratio for multiple social media platforms, among many other tools.

    In Blender 5.3, you’ll be able to use AI for denoising, providing real-time lighting and noise-free feedback to help navigate a scene and make editing easier.

    Surface Laptop Ultra exploded view with RTX Spark

    (Credit: Brian Westover)

    Finally, Nvidia’s Broadcast app, which adds AI effects like noise removal and virtual backgrounds to your livestreams and video calls, will run locally on RTX Spark.

    Many of these features are, for the moment, exclusive to RTX Spark laptops and won’t be widely available outside of those systems until other Windows-based AI-agent-ready machines are on the market. Cloud-enabled versions of these features are already out there, but there are many privacy and other benefits to running them locally.

    Nvidia PAIR: Distributed Home Mesh Computing

    If you’ve got multiple PCs in your home or office, an RTX Spark machine can unite them and harness their computing power to make things run even faster. Using the Nvidia Personal AI Router (PAIR) feature, an RTX Spark PC can distribute AI inference requests across machines. 

    It essentially turns all your PCs into a network of individual, independent machines that can be coordinated to handle different parts of a larger task. It can’t turn all of your systems into a single, super-powerful virtual GPU, but it can relieve hardware bottlenecks for heavy tasks by putting local GPUs and memory to work. The idea is that it maintains responsive performance by recruiting the unused capacity already in your home and applying that to different workloads.

    The RTX Spark can serve as either the central machine in that network or one of several machines working in concert.


    Testing RTX Spark: Benchmarking AI as It Changes

    At PCMag, we’ve been wrestling with how to properly benchmark the growing ecosystem of AI PCs for months now. We’ve looked at existing benchmarking tools, we’ve looked at complex evaluation protocols for server-grade hardware, and we’ve dabbled in making experiential use cases into repeatable, measurable tests.

    And that’s all still a work in progress. But we have developed our own testing protocols for these different classes of machines. We’ve worked with an outside contractor with experience in AI benchmarking and ties to MLCommons, the organization behind the MLPerf testing suite, and they’ve developed preliminary benchmarks for testing NPU performance, measuring discrete GPU performance in AI tasks, and even evaluating these super-SoC machines like the Nvidia DGX Spark and the new RTX Spark laptops.

    We’ll be rolling out our first test numbers tomorrow as part of our initial evaluation of RTX Spark. For now, we’re looking at Time to First Token (TTFT), which measures the delay between submitting a prompt and receiving the initial output token of the response. This is the basic measure of performance for local AI, but it’s just that: basic. 

    Next, we look at tokens per second (TPS), which measures the generation rate of how many subsequent tokens are produced per second during the decode stage, which is generally a process that’s limited by memory bandwidth. We also look at time per output token (TPOT), which is sort of an inverse expression of TPS, reporting token generation speed as average milliseconds per token. Again, this is just a basic rate of token output, which doesn’t really take into account the quality of a response or the accuracy of the response, only the speed of token output.

    We’re using specialized runs of MLPerf Client and the LM Studio Qwen benchmark to execute a series of warm-up tasks and preset prompt sequences, doing multiple runs of different prompt sizes, taking advantage of different memory allocations, and averaging the different runs to get a generalized number of measured performance.

    We’re doing our best to stack that up against a broad range of hardware across Intel and AMD (both x86 and x64), Apple silicon with M-series Arm processors, and a range of Windows on Arm hardware, including both Qualcomm Snapdragon X and now RTX Spark. And we’re doing this across several operating systems, with a huge range of memory capacities, models we could potentially use, and use cases ranging from text generation to image generation to agentic workflows.

    That’s all to say that our AI evaluation is still in its early days. But that’s true for everybody, and the landscape is changing fast. We will share more details about the tests and our results as we evaluate our first batch of systems for RTX Spark. Stay tuned.

    About Our Expert