Category: News

  • Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    In the latest twist in the Jimmy Kimmel–James Talarico interview drama, the White House is now accusing the ABC late-night host and his network of spinning a fake tale of federal strong-arming.

    Put another way, Team Trump insists there was never pressure put on Kimmel and ABC from the Trump administration to scuttle an interview with the poll-topping Texas Democrat and Senate hopeful.

    “Jimmy Kimmel is play-acting — as he often does — to create a false narrative about this administration’s policies,” Assistant White House Press Secretary Davis Ingle said Thursday.

    “Chairman Carr has not threatened him regarding interviewing James Talarico, or any other candidate.,” Ingle added of Carr, the FCC chairman, just before the second night of Donald Trump‘s GOP midterm convention aka pageant reconvenes. “Any media outlet blindly amplifying Kimmel’s egocentric delusion should insist on proof. Of which they will find none.”

    ABC parent company Disney had no comment on the response from the White House when contacted by Deadline. The lack of response is unsurprising given that the company is the midst of an escalating legal and regulatory First Amendment clash with the FCC over station license renewals and charges of political thumbs on the scale.

    Jimmy Kimmel

    ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!‘

    ABC/YouTube

    Wednesday’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! monologue had some distinct déjà vu of what Stephen Colbert went through on CBS last year with Talarico, who is looking to flip the Lone Star state for the Dems for the first time in decades. The L.A.-based Kimmel revealed that an on-air sit-down with Talarico would not air on ABC tonight.

    After naming off various political candidates including Trump, who Kimmel has talked to over the years, the Live! host put federal regulatory enforcement under the spotlight. “[The] FCC has threatened me, threatened our show, threatened our network, ABC, our affiliates, our local stations, based on simple, traditional editorial decisions,” Kimmel said. “Guest bookings, it would seem, they don’t like.”

    “And so, out of consideration for our local stations, especially our ABC affiliates in Texas who would have to deal with this nonsense, my interview tomorrow with James Talarico will not air on television,” he stated. “It will be posted on YouTube instead.”

    James Talarico

    James Talarico

    Brandon Bell/Getty Images

    Interestingly, Talarico, who is in Los Angeles today and Friday for a series of deep-pocket Hollywood fundraisers, was not officially listed as a guest on Kimmel before the host made his announcement. In a separate interview with MS NOW’s Symone Sanders Townsend today on The Weeknight, Talarico called the Kimmel situation the “most dangerous form of cancel culture.” With the knowledge that much of the consumption of late-night shows actually happens online anyway, the candidate went on to say: “I’m still hopeful that we can have this interview on the air. So we’ll see what happens tonight.”

    Between Trump in Texas and Talarico in California, we certainly will.

    At the same time, with the wounds still fresh from Disney’s sudden sidelining of Kimmel for almost a week a year ago over affiliate fallout from a remark he made about the tragic assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, there is a tendency for some to get lost in the weeds of this. There is also a tendency for some to start shouting about equal-time rules without a read of the fine print.

    The equal time rule requires broadcasters that feature political candidates offer comparable airtime to rivals — if it is requested. Daytime and late-night talks shows have long operated under the assumption that they fell under an exemption for news and news interview programming. But in January, Carr issued guidance suggesting that such talk shows may not be free from the rule.

    The equal time rule also is often misunderstood. It applies to political candidates in a certain cycle. So, for instance, Ted Cruz’s appearance on The View this week makes no difference because he’s not up for reelection this midterm.

    Carr has argued that nothing is preventing late-night or daytime talk shows from featuring a political candidate as a guest. They just have to be prepared to offer time to rivals as well.

    As ABC pushes back on Carr’s investigation of The View, the network’s argument is one of selective enforcement as the FCC chairman has not singled out other broadcasters, like conservative talk radio. The network has also pointed to a 2002 letter from the FCC confirming the show’s exemption from the equal time rule. The network also has characterized the equal time rule as unworkable, given that its stations may be on the hook not just for major party candidates but also third-party rivals.

    Again, let’s see what happens tonight.

    Worth noting that when the now axed Colbert’s interview with Talarico was shifted over to YouTube, it got a huge number of views and the candidate raised more than $2.5 million in just over 24 hours. That might be history worth repeating itself for the Texas Democrat, false narrative or not.

  • Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    In the latest twist in the Jimmy Kimmel–James Talarico interview drama, the White House is now accusing the ABC late-night host and his network of spinning a fake tale of federal strong-arming.

    Put another way, Team Trump insists there was never pressure put on Kimmel and ABC from the Trump administration to scuttle an interview with the poll-topping Texas Democrat and Senate hopeful.

    “Jimmy Kimmel is play-acting — as he often does — to create a false narrative about this administration’s policies,” Assistant White House Press Secretary Davis Ingle said Thursday.

    “Chairman Carr has not threatened him regarding interviewing James Talarico, or any other candidate.,” Ingle added of Carr, the FCC chairman, just before the second night of Donald Trump‘s GOP midterm convention aka pageant reconvenes. “Any media outlet blindly amplifying Kimmel’s egocentric delusion should insist on proof. Of which they will find none.”

    ABC parent company Disney had no comment on the response from the White House when contacted by Deadline. The lack of response is unsurprising given that the company is the midst of an escalating legal and regulatory First Amendment clash with the FCC over station license renewals and charges of political thumbs on the scale.

    Jimmy Kimmel

    ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!‘

    ABC/YouTube

    Wednesday’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! monologue had some distinct déjà vu of what Stephen Colbert went through on CBS last year with Talarico, who is looking to flip the Lone Star state for the Dems for the first time in decades. The L.A.-based Kimmel revealed that an on-air sit-down with Talarico would not air on ABC tonight.

    After naming off various political candidates including Trump, who Kimmel has talked to over the years, the Live! host put federal regulatory enforcement under the spotlight. “[The] FCC has threatened me, threatened our show, threatened our network, ABC, our affiliates, our local stations, based on simple, traditional editorial decisions,” Kimmel said. “Guest bookings, it would seem, they don’t like.”

    “And so, out of consideration for our local stations, especially our ABC affiliates in Texas who would have to deal with this nonsense, my interview tomorrow with James Talarico will not air on television,” he stated. “It will be posted on YouTube instead.”

    James Talarico

    James Talarico

    Brandon Bell/Getty Images

    Interestingly, Talarico, who is in Los Angeles today and Friday for a series of deep-pocket Hollywood fundraisers, was not officially listed as a guest on Kimmel before the host made his announcement. In a separate interview with MS NOW’s Symone Sanders Townsend today on The Weeknight, Talarico called the Kimmel situation the “most dangerous form of cancel culture.” With the knowledge that much of the consumption of late-night shows actually happens online anyway, the candidate went on to say: “I’m still hopeful that we can have this interview on the air. So we’ll see what happens tonight.”

    Between Trump in Texas and Talarico in California, we certainly will.

    At the same time, with the wounds still fresh from Disney’s sudden sidelining of Kimmel for almost a week a year ago over affiliate fallout from a remark he made about the tragic assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, there is a tendency for some to get lost in the weeds of this. There is also a tendency for some to start shouting about equal-time rules without a read of the fine print.

    The equal time rule requires broadcasters that feature political candidates offer comparable airtime to rivals — if it is requested. Daytime and late-night talks shows have long operated under the assumption that they fell under an exemption for news and news interview programming. But in January, Carr issued guidance suggesting that such talk shows may not be free from the rule.

    The equal time rule also is often misunderstood. It applies to political candidates in a certain cycle. So, for instance, Ted Cruz’s appearance on The View this week makes no difference because he’s not up for reelection this midterm.

    Carr has argued that nothing is preventing late-night or daytime talk shows from featuring a political candidate as a guest. They just have to be prepared to offer time to rivals as well.

    As ABC pushes back on Carr’s investigation of The View, the network’s argument is one of selective enforcement as the FCC chairman has not singled out other broadcasters, like conservative talk radio. The network has also pointed to a 2002 letter from the FCC confirming the show’s exemption from the equal time rule. The network also has characterized the equal time rule as unworkable, given that its stations may be on the hook not just for major party candidates but also third-party rivals.

    Again, let’s see what happens tonight.

    Worth noting that when the now axed Colbert’s interview with Talarico was shifted over to YouTube, it got a huge number of views and the candidate raised more than $2.5 million in just over 24 hours. That might be history worth repeating itself for the Texas Democrat, false narrative or not.

  • Did Trump say he saved people on Titanic? Here’s the truth

    Did Trump say he saved people on Titanic? Here’s the truth

    Claim:

    On Sept. 8, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump said in a speech that he helped save victims of the 1912 sinking of the RMS Titanic.

    Rating:

    False

    A rumor that U.S. President Donald Trump claimed in a speech he had saved victims of the 1912 sinking of the RMS Titanic is spreading online. 

    According to social media posts sharing the claim, Trump said he “saved more people than anybody,” told the ship’s captain to “turn left,” and that “nobody knows icebergs better than [him].” This is despite the fact, of course, that Trump was born in 1946, meaning he was not alive in 1912 when the ship famously sank. 

    Some readers contacted us to ask whether Trump really said this.

    We found that Trump made no such assertion, and the rumor is false.

    To investigate the rumor’s legitimacy, we first used search engines such as DuckDuckGo, Google and Yahoo. If Trump truly had mentioned assisting rescuers on the Titanic in a speech, journalists with reputable news outlets, such as The Associated Press or Reuters, would have widely reported on it, and those search inquiries would have uncovered such evidence. 

    That was not the case. We did not find any credible reporting suggesting that Trump had mentioned the Titanic during a recent speech.

    Snopes traced the claim as far back as an X post made on the afternoon of Sept. 8, but could not definitively confirm that post as the rumor’s origin. However, it neatly aligned with a speech Trump gave earlier that day at a tribute event for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, in which he repeated a long-standing claim that he participated in relief efforts. A transcript of that speech included no mention of the Titanic.

    Given the timing of those remarks, we concluded that Trump’s words about 9/11 in that speech served as inspiration for the fictitious rumor, which we suspect was intended as satirical. However, the earliest account we found that shared the claim did not indicate that in its post. Snopes contacted the X user to confirm our suspicions, but had not heard back by publication. 

    For further reading, we also investigated whether there was any evidence two firefighters helped Trump escape a building in danger of collapsing after 9/11, as he claimed in the same Sept. 8 speech.

  • Was Trump at Ground Zero with group of workers days after 9/11, as he claimed?

    Was Trump at Ground Zero with group of workers days after 9/11, as he claimed?

    Since the days immediately following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, U.S. President Donald Trump, a native of New York City, has made numerous claims about what he saw that day and his involvement in the recovery efforts.

    One such claim Trump has repeatedly made is his assertion that he was at Ground Zero within days of 9/11 and that he sent workers to the recovery effort at the site of the World Trade Center.

    In September 2026, multiple X users debated the veracity of the claim. For example, one user (archived) wrote, “There’s no proof Trump sent a large group of construction workers to Ground Zero.”

    Other popular (archived) posts (archived) said there was no evidence Trump, himself, went to Ground Zero and helped with recovery efforts.

    Another X post (archived) alternatively claimed, “President Trump is dropping VIDEO PROOF for every Fake News outlet lying to millions that he was nowhere near Ground Zero after 9/11.”

    (X)

    Many Snopes readers searched the site to find out if Trump’s claims were true.

    A couple of days after the Sept. 11 attacks, Trump told multiple news media outlets that he sent at least 100 workers to Ground Zero to help pull people and bodies out of the rubble, with 125 to 150 more on the way. However, Snopes has never been able to identify any public evidence that crews he hired helped in the immediate recovery of the 9/11 attacks. Since we cannot independently confirm with certainty whether Trump had crews on site somewhere, we are leaving this claim unrated.

    Footage of interviews Trump conducted in the immediate days after 9/11 placed him within blocks of Ground Zero. Trump said in those interviews that he visited Ground Zero to encourage the workers he said he brought to assist with clearing rubble at the site. It was not possible to find evidence showing Trump helped clear the pile of debris at Ground Zero, as some posts disputed.

    In a phone call with a local news media station immediately after the planes crashed into the Twin Towers, Trump said he watched the towers fall from the window of one of his buildings.

    Trump’s September 2026 remarks

    On Sept. 8, 2026, in a post on Truth Social (archived), Trump continued to maintain that he was at Ground Zero with construction workers after 9/11, clarifying that it was “obviously not on the same day as the collapse, but shortly thereafter”:

    The Failing New York Magazine wrote a story that I wasn’t down at the World Trade Center after the Tragedy of September 11th, because nobody saw me there. Well, I don’t think I would be the first thing on anyone’s mind but, I was there, obviously not on the same day as the collapse, but shortly thereafter, with a large group of Construction Workers.

    He then added he “was there as soon as the Law allowed.”

    The president was referencing a New York Magazine article disputing his comments about where he was on the day of, and the days following, the attacks.

    Trump also made this claim (archived) in a Fox News interview two days prior, in which he added the additional context that he was constructing a new building in New York City. This is the reason, according to Trump at a 9/11 anniversary event on Sept. 8, why he had workers who he could bring to the rubble of the World Trade Center:

    I was building a big building in New York and I took the whole crew down there right after this happened and they had no hesitation. Everybody went down with me. We went down as a big group of people. It wasn’t too much we could do, I’ll be honest.

    What Trump told the media in 2001

    Trump spoke to the media multiple times a few days after 9/11. On Sept. 13, he told a German news channel, that he had more than 100 men down at the site of the World Trade Center and more than 125 on their way. According to the German-speaking reporter, the interview was conducted a few blocks from Ground Zero.

    That same day, NBC News interviewed Trump at what appeared to be the same location as his interview with the German news channel. Trump said he had “hundreds of men inside working right now” and was bringing down another 125.

    PBS has a recording of another Trump interview from Sept. 13, in which Trump said he had 100 workers helping to dig people and bodies out of the rubble at the World Trade Center, with another 100 to 150 workers “coming.” He told PBS that those workers were “digging out” at the site.

    In another interview from that day, Trump told reporters his workers had been at Ground Zero “for about a day and a half.” He said they were men from his company and that a couple had gotten hurt while working at the site. He also said he was just down at Ground Zero and was there to support them.

    The evidence

    When Snopes first researched this claim in 2018, we spoke to Richard Alles, a retired deputy chief with the New York City Fire Department, who later served as director of 9/11 community affairs for the law firm Barasch McGarry Salzman and Penson. Alles said that in all his time he spent at Ground Zero as a New York City Fire Department battalion chief, starting 20 minutes after the buildings collapsed, he never saw a large group of workers whom Trump had hired at the site assisting with search and rescue efforts. “This is the first I’m hearing of it,” Alles said via phone call. “There would have been no need for that. Between police, fire and the construction crews, we had it all covered.”

    Alles added that the construction crews he saw at Ground Zero helping rescue workers were from the trade unions and were not hired by Trump.

    John Feal, founder of the 9/11 first responder health advocacy nonprofit the FealGood Foundation, told Snopes at the time that he responded to Ground Zero on Sept. 12, 2001, as a construction demolitions expert and that he didn’t see evidence of hundreds of workers hired by Trump at the site.

    The Trump Organization was building in New York City in 2001, according to the Skyscraper Center database on skyscrapers. In fact, it finished a series of residential buildings in the city at Trump Place between 1998 and 2004. He was also building the Trump World Tower residential building near the United Nations Headquarters that year.

    However, it was not possible to find verifiable information about how many people, either directly employed by Trump or contracted to work on one of the Trump Organization’s projects, were working on these buildings and in New York City at the time.

    A New York Times fact-check from July 2019 referenced Timothy O’Brien, the author of “TrumpNation: The Art of Being the Donald,” who reportedly said the Trump Organization numbered “a little bit over a dozen people” at the time of the attacks, making it impossible to send as many workers to the relief effort as Trump claimed.

    Neither the White House nor the Trump Organization responded to Snopes’ requests for corroborating evidence in 2018. This lack of response is consistent with past attempts by Politifact, The Washington Post, The New York Times and Politifact again to reach out to the White House and/or the Trump Organization to corroborate evidence of Trump’s claims.

    Snopes contacted the Trump Organization by email to request evidence that its workers or contractors assisted in recovery efforts following the attacks on the World Trade Center. We will update this article if and when we receive a reply.

    Snopes’ archives contributed to this report.

  • Was Trump rescued by 2 firefighters after 9/11?

    Was Trump rescued by 2 firefighters after 9/11?

    • The claim that Donald Trump was rescued by firefighters in or around the United States Steel Building (also known as One Liberty Plaza) after 9/11 in Manhattan is unproven. 
    • According to some versions of the claim, Trump said firefighters pulled him from the rubble at Ground Zero. That was a misrepresentation of his actual words.
    • The rumor stems from a speech Trump made on Sept. 8, 2026, while commemorating the 25th anniversary of 9/11. In it, he said the United States Steel Building was “creaking” a lot and “we thought it was going to fall down” when two firefighters “grabbed [him] under the arms” and got him out of there. 
    • Video interviews of Trump place him a few blocks from the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan in the days following the attack. However, there is no concrete evidence that Trump was inside or around One Liberty Plaza and no firefighters have come forward to corroborate his account. We also know that the building itself was not in danger of collapse in the days after 9/11, despite rumors at the time. 
    • We reached out to the White House, which did not respond to questions about Trump’s whereabouts and actions in the wake of 9/11. A spokesperson called the speculation from the media a “disgrace.”

    In 2026, the U.S. marked the 25th anniversary of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. As U.S. President Donald Trump commemorated the occasion in a speech on Sept. 8, he claimed that he was rescued by firefighters in New York City just after the attack. 

    Snopes readers asked us to confirm if Trump was indeed rescued by firefighters from the possible collapse of the United States Steel Building, a historic name for the building now known as One Liberty Plaza.

    Other readers claimed Trump said firefighters pulled “him from the rubble at 9/11.” 

    Posts sharing versions of the rumor appeared on platforms including Facebook and X.

    Some posts incorrectly claimed Trump said the firefighters pulled him from the rubble at Ground Zero. That was a misrepresentation or misunderstanding of what Trump actually said.

    On Sept. 8, 2026, Trump recounted his purported rescue by two firefighters during a speech (emphasis ours): 

    I was building a big building in New York, and I took the whole crew down there right after this happened.

    And they were — they had no hesitation. Everybody went down with me; we went down as a big group of people. Wasn’t too much we could do, I’ll be honest. It was raw; nobody had seen anything like it ever. We had other buildings — the United States Steel Building was creaking, really creaking, and we thought it was going to fall down. The truth is, it creaked a lot; it creaked, it still creaks, but it never came down. And I’ll never forget two firemen — we thought it was coming down on top of us and two firemen, big, strong guys — and I’m not the smallest guy in the world. They grabbed me under the arms, said got to get out of here, and they literally lifted me up. This is not easy to do, I’m big.

    They lifted me up and they started running with me. I said fellas, I can run myself. But they were amazing, but they thought it was coming down; it didn’t come down, US steel. 

    Trump made several claims in this part of the speech: first, he said he “took the whole crew down” to Ground Zero to help after the attack. Second, he claimed that the “United States Steel Building was creaking” and in danger of collapsing on him. Third, he claimed he was saved by two firefighters. 

    We investigated Trump’s claim that he went to Ground Zero with a group of workers immediately after the 9/11 attacks in a separate article and found no public records to support it, though we cannot rule out that it happened.

    We have no evidence to support Trump’s claim that he was rescued by two firefighters at One Liberty Plaza, though television interviews place him in the vicinity in the aftermath of 9/11. As such, we leave this claim unrated until more information becomes available.

    We reached out to the White House to ask about Trump’s location after the attack, the identity of the firefighters and more. The White House did not answer our questions and sent us the following statement from spokesperson Davis Ingle over email: 

    President Trump spent the morning yesterday paying tribute to the heroic first responders who laid down their lives in service to others in the September 11th attacks and honoring their incredible families. The President was relaying his experience of a city reeling immediately after and in the days and weeks after the horrific attacks – and the fact that the failing legacy media is using this to try to attack him is a disgrace and yet another reason why Americans’ trust in the media is at an all-time low.

    Below, we address the claims Trump made about being at One Liberty Plaza and his alleged rescue by firefighters.

    Was Trump at One Liberty Plaza?

    There is video evidence that Trump was near Ground Zero in the days after the attack, but we found no proof that he was actually inside the nearby One Liberty Plaza. Trump’s remarks are not clear about where he was standing when the building was supposedly creaking. 

    The White House did not respond to our request for photo or video evidence of Trump’s proximity to One Liberty Plaza specifically. 

    Trump’s claim that the building was in danger of collapse was incorrect. Right after the attack, many reportedly expressed concerns that the building would collapse, but officials at the Department of Buildings debunked the claims. According to an October 2001 New York Times report, the building remained structurally sound even on Sept. 12:

    ”There are no structural concerns with this building,” said Ilyse Fink, the director of communications for the city’s Department of Buildings, reinforcing a message she has delivered almost daily since Sept. 12. ”It is not and was not in danger of collapse. The building is structurally sound.”

    Did firefighters save Trump from a potential building collapse?

    Given that we do not know exactly where Trump was around One Liberty Plaza, and that we know the building was never in danger of collapse, it is not clear which building and which firefighters Trump was referring to in his Sept. 8 speech.  

    The White House also did not respond to our question about the identity of the firefighters. Without any firefighters corroborating Trump’s account, this claim remains unproven. 

    In sum, while we know Trump was in the vicinity of Ground Zero in the days after the attack, we do not have evidence that he was in One Liberty Plaza, nor that he was rescued by firefighters. We also know that the building was not in danger of collapse. Trump did not mention other buildings in his remarks. 

    Snopes has fact-checked many of Trump’s claims in the aftermath of 9/11. 

  • Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    In the latest twist in the Jimmy Kimmel–James Talarico interview drama, the White House is now accusing the ABC late-night host and his network of spinning a fake tale of federal strong-arming.

    Put another way, Team Trump insists there was never pressure put on Kimmel and ABC from the Trump administration to scuttle an interview with the poll-topping Texas Democrat and Senate hopeful.

    “Jimmy Kimmel is play-acting — as he often does — to create a false narrative about this administration’s policies,” Assistant White House Press Secretary Davis Ingle said Thursday.

    “Chairman Carr has not threatened him regarding interviewing James Talarico, or any other candidate.,” Ingle added of Carr, the FCC chairman, just before the second night of Donald Trump‘s GOP midterm convention aka pageant reconvenes. “Any media outlet blindly amplifying Kimmel’s egocentric delusion should insist on proof. Of which they will find none.”

    ABC parent company Disney had no comment on the response from the White House when contacted by Deadline. The lack of response is unsurprising given that the company is the midst of an escalating legal and regulatory First Amendment clash with the FCC over station license renewals and charges of political thumbs on the scale.

    Jimmy Kimmel

    ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!‘

    ABC/YouTube

    Wednesday’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! monologue had some distinct déjà vu of what Stephen Colbert went through on CBS last year with Talarico, who is looking to flip the Lone Star state for the Dems for the first time in decades. The L.A.-based Kimmel revealed that an on-air sit-down with Talarico would not air on ABC tonight.

    After naming off various political candidates including Trump, who Kimmel has talked to over the years, the Live! host put federal regulatory enforcement under the spotlight. “[The] FCC has threatened me, threatened our show, threatened our network, ABC, our affiliates, our local stations, based on simple, traditional editorial decisions,” Kimmel said. “Guest bookings, it would seem, they don’t like.”

    “And so, out of consideration for our local stations, especially our ABC affiliates in Texas who would have to deal with this nonsense, my interview tomorrow with James Talarico will not air on television,” he stated. “It will be posted on YouTube instead.”

    James Talarico

    James Talarico

    Brandon Bell/Getty Images

    Interestingly, Talarico, who is in Los Angeles today and Friday for a series of deep-pocket Hollywood fundraisers, was not officially listed as a guest on Kimmel before the host made his announcement. In a separate interview with MS NOW’s Symone Sanders Townsend today on The Weeknight, Talarico called the Kimmel situation the “most dangerous form of cancel culture.” With the knowledge that much of the consumption of late-night shows actually happens online anyway, the candidate went on to say: “I’m still hopeful that we can have this interview on the air. So we’ll see what happens tonight.”

    Between Trump in Texas and Talarico in California, we certainly will.

    At the same time, with the wounds still fresh from Disney’s sudden sidelining of Kimmel for almost a week a year ago over affiliate fallout from a remark he made about the tragic assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, there is a tendency for some to get lost in the weeds of this. There is also a tendency for some to start shouting about equal-time rules without a read of the fine print.

    The equal time rule requires broadcasters that feature political candidates offer comparable airtime to rivals — if it is requested. Daytime and late-night talks shows have long operated under the assumption that they fell under an exemption for news and news interview programming. But in January, Carr issued guidance suggesting that such talk shows may not be free from the rule.

    The equal time rule also is often misunderstood. It applies to political candidates in a certain cycle. So, for instance, Ted Cruz’s appearance on The View this week makes no difference because he’s not up for reelection this midterm.

    Carr has argued that nothing is preventing late-night or daytime talk shows from featuring a political candidate as a guest. They just have to be prepared to offer time to rivals as well.

    As ABC pushes back on Carr’s investigation of The View, the network’s argument is one of selective enforcement as the FCC chairman has not singled out other broadcasters, like conservative talk radio. The network has also pointed to a 2002 letter from the FCC confirming the show’s exemption from the equal time rule. The network also has characterized the equal time rule as unworkable, given that its stations may be on the hook not just for major party candidates but also third-party rivals.

    Again, let’s see what happens tonight.

    Worth noting that when the now axed Colbert’s interview with Talarico was shifted over to YouTube, it got a huge number of views and the candidate raised more than $2.5 million in just over 24 hours. That might be history worth repeating itself for the Texas Democrat, false narrative or not.

  • Is the US more anti-Muslim now than after 9/11?

    Is the US more anti-Muslim now than after 9/11?

    Twenty-five years after 9/11, negative perceptions of Islam persist even as Muslim political representation grows. Al Jazeera’s Noor Wazwaz looks at what has and hasn’t changed for Muslims in the US.

  • Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    In the latest twist in the Jimmy Kimmel–James Talarico interview drama, the White House is now accusing the ABC late-night host and his network of spinning a fake tale of federal strong-arming.

    Put another way, Team Trump insists there was never pressure put on Kimmel and ABC from the Trump administration to scuttle an interview with the poll-topping Texas Democrat and Senate hopeful.

    “Jimmy Kimmel is play-acting — as he often does — to create a false narrative about this administration’s policies,” Assistant White House Press Secretary Davis Ingle said Thursday.

    “Chairman Carr has not threatened him regarding interviewing James Talarico, or any other candidate.,” Ingle added of Carr, the FCC chairman, just before the second night of Donald Trump‘s GOP midterm convention aka pageant reconvenes. “Any media outlet blindly amplifying Kimmel’s egocentric delusion should insist on proof. Of which they will find none.”

    ABC parent company Disney had no comment on the response from the White House when contacted by Deadline. The lack of response is unsurprising given that the company is the midst of an escalating legal and regulatory First Amendment clash with the FCC over station license renewals and charges of political thumbs on the scale.

    Jimmy Kimmel

    ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!‘

    ABC/YouTube

    Wednesday’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! monologue had some distinct déjà vu of what Stephen Colbert went through on CBS last year with Talarico, who is looking to flip the Lone Star state for the Dems for the first time in decades. The L.A.-based Kimmel revealed that an on-air sit-down with Talarico would not air on ABC tonight.

    After naming off various political candidates including Trump, who Kimmel has talked to over the years, the Live! host put federal regulatory enforcement under the spotlight. “[The] FCC has threatened me, threatened our show, threatened our network, ABC, our affiliates, our local stations, based on simple, traditional editorial decisions,” Kimmel said. “Guest bookings, it would seem, they don’t like.”

    “And so, out of consideration for our local stations, especially our ABC affiliates in Texas who would have to deal with this nonsense, my interview tomorrow with James Talarico will not air on television,” he stated. “It will be posted on YouTube instead.”

    James Talarico

    James Talarico

    Brandon Bell/Getty Images

    Interestingly, Talarico, who is in Los Angeles today and Friday for a series of deep-pocket Hollywood fundraisers, was not officially listed as a guest on Kimmel before the host made his announcement. In a separate interview with MS NOW’s Symone Sanders Townsend today on The Weeknight, Talarico called the Kimmel situation the “most dangerous form of cancel culture.” With the knowledge that much of the consumption of late-night shows actually happens online anyway, the candidate went on to say: “I’m still hopeful that we can have this interview on the air. So we’ll see what happens tonight.”

    Between Trump in Texas and Talarico in California, we certainly will.

    At the same time, with the wounds still fresh from Disney’s sudden sidelining of Kimmel for almost a week a year ago over affiliate fallout from a remark he made about the tragic assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, there is a tendency for some to get lost in the weeds of this. There is also a tendency for some to start shouting about equal-time rules without a read of the fine print.

    The equal time rule requires broadcasters that feature political candidates offer comparable airtime to rivals — if it is requested. Daytime and late-night talks shows have long operated under the assumption that they fell under an exemption for news and news interview programming. But in January, Carr issued guidance suggesting that such talk shows may not be free from the rule.

    The equal time rule also is often misunderstood. It applies to political candidates in a certain cycle. So, for instance, Ted Cruz’s appearance on The View this week makes no difference because he’s not up for reelection this midterm.

    Carr has argued that nothing is preventing late-night or daytime talk shows from featuring a political candidate as a guest. They just have to be prepared to offer time to rivals as well.

    As ABC pushes back on Carr’s investigation of The View, the network’s argument is one of selective enforcement as the FCC chairman has not singled out other broadcasters, like conservative talk radio. The network has also pointed to a 2002 letter from the FCC confirming the show’s exemption from the equal time rule. The network also has characterized the equal time rule as unworkable, given that its stations may be on the hook not just for major party candidates but also third-party rivals.

    Again, let’s see what happens tonight.

    Worth noting that when the now axed Colbert’s interview with Talarico was shifted over to YouTube, it got a huge number of views and the candidate raised more than $2.5 million in just over 24 hours. That might be history worth repeating itself for the Texas Democrat, false narrative or not.

  • Donald Trump’s GOP Midterm Convention Fails To Get A Bounce In Cable News Viewership

    Donald Trump’s GOP Midterm Convention Fails To Get A Bounce In Cable News Viewership

    The first night of Donald Trump‘s midterm convention failed to generate a ratings bounce for Fox News, with the audiences comparable or even slightly below regular primetime programming.

    Fox News’s coverage of the convention dominated the primetime hours on Wednesday, drawing an average 2.3 million viewers. But that is less than its September, 2025 primetime viewership, when it averaged 2.54 million viewers.

    During Donald Trump’s speech from 9 p.m. ET to 11 p.m. ET, Fox News averaged 2.5 million viewers. A year ago, during the month of September, Hannity drew an average of 2.89 million in the 9 p.m. ET hour and Gutfeld! garnered an average of 2.94 million at 10 p.m. ET.

    CNN‘s primetime coverage averaged 441,000 viewers, compared to a 543,000 average in September, 2025. MS NOW posted 1.1 million viewers in primetime, an uptick from an average of 810,000 during the month a year ago. In contrast to Fox News and CNN, MS NOW carried little of Trump’s speech and stayed on analysis from Jen Psaki and Lawrence O’Donnell and their guests.

    The figures are from Nielsen via Fox News.

  • Jimmy Kimmel’s James Talarico Interview Posted To YouTube As Host Calls Out Trump And FCC: “They Want To Make Our Editorial Decisions For Us”

    Jimmy Kimmel’s James Talarico Interview Posted To YouTube As Host Calls Out Trump And FCC: “They Want To Make Our Editorial Decisions For Us”

    Jimmy Kimmel‘s interview with James Talarico was posted to YouTube on Thursday evening rather than the late-night host’s ABC broadcast amid concerns over an FCC enforcement action.

    “Why are they so scared of you?” Kimmel asked Talarico at the outset of the 20 minute interview, noting that Stephen Colbert also posted a sit down with the Texas U.S. Senate candidate in February over concerns it would invoke the the rule.

    “They are worried that we’re going to win this race in Texas,” Talarico said. “But we are the underdogs until the last vote is counted.”

    For decades, daytime and late night TV talk shows have operated on the assumption that they were exempt from the FCC’s equal time rule, which requires broadcasters who feature candidates to provide comparable time to their rivals, if it is requested.

    But in January, the FCC under chairman Brendan Carr, appointed by Donald Trump, issued guidance to broadcasters that TV talk shows may not be exempt, a move that critics saw as a regulatory effort to crackdown on daytime and late-night hosts the president does not like. Weeks later, the FCC started an investigation of The View after it featured Talarico as a guest. The equal time rule includes an exemption for news coverage and news interviews.

    ABC has pushed back against the FCC’s actions, releasing a 2002 letter from the FCC affirming that The View was exempt. The network also has argued that the FCC is selectively enforcing the rule, as its January guidance did not address talk radio, where conservative hosts routinely feature political candidates, including Talarico’s Republican opponent, Ken Paxton.

    Kimmel opened his interview by noting that, until recently, the FCC has long recognized that late-night talk shows have been exempt, pointing to Donald Trump’s guest spots.

    “When he was running, he was on the show two times, but now I guess he doesn’t like me anymore, or the First Amendment, and so the FCC has threatened me or threaten my show, our network, even our local ABC stations, because they want to make our editorial decisions for us, which of course we cannot accept,” Kimmel said. “And so tonight we’re bypassing the public airwaves and hosting this YouTube interview on YouTube, even though our government would clearly prefer that we not do it at all.” The FCC does not regulate streaming platforms.

    In a statement earlier on Thursday, a White House spokesman claimed that Kimmel was creating “a false narrative about this administration’s policies.

    “Chairman Carr has not threatened him regarding interviewing James Talarico, or any other candidate,” a spokesperson said.

    Carr has not commented, but previously said that the TV talk shows are free to feature political candidates, but they may be on the hook to offer time to their competitors. He also suggested that the Colbert interview was a publicity stunt designed to drive up fundraising for Talarico.

    In his monologue on the Jimmy Kimmel Live TV broadcast, Kimmel challenged the White House’s statement. He told the audience that he would be interviewing Talarico but viewers would not see it. He called the threat of FCC action “yet another attack on free speech, something that is all too familiar for the show for us.” Kimmel also said that he would “love” to interview Paxton, but the rule would not just apply to Talarico’s GOP rival. “Our affiliates in Texas would have to give equal time to as many candidates as there are on the ballot. There’s about 10 candidates on the ballot,” Kimmel said. ABC’s legal team has argued that offering all candidates such time is untenable.

    The interview was otherwise a pretty standard sitdown for Talarico, giving him the opportunity to repeat some of his campaign themes, including how his life has been shaped by religion and Jesus Christ.

    It was also clear that Kimmel was a fan of Talarico, and he even ran a portion of one of his campaign ads.

    He said, “I’ve been following you for a long time. I’ve been watching your videos. I think what you’re doing is great. I really do. … You hit on something that used to be on all of the bumper stickers. ‘What would Jesus do?’ I think Jesus has been co-opted by this MAGA enterprise in this way. It makes no sense when you really think about it. Would Jesus be throwing people into vans and separating them from their children? Would Jesus be taking kids off food stamps? … This is not the Jesus that I learned about growing up. And you bring it right back to the Bible, to the real teachings of Jesus, and it is it is very authentic.”

    If the past is any guide, the Kimmel interview may ultimately draw more attention that Talarico would have gotten via a standard broadcast. His interview with Colbert has drawn 9.5 million views on YouTube, far more than the show’s average.