Category: Business

  • Tether CEO Issues Bullish Bitcoin Post as Price Stabilizes at $75,000

    Tether CEO Issues Bullish Bitcoin Post as Price Stabilizes at $75,000

    Paolo Ardoino, the CEO of Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin firm, has reaffirmed his bullish stance on Bitcoin, sparking reactions as all eyes appear to be on Bitcoin following the recent market rally.

    In his post, Ardoino declared that Bitcoin is resistant after a viral artwork shared by Satoshigallery sparked the attention of the crypto community.

    The image features a striking human-form statue forged from steel, and the sculpture was shared with a caption that says, “You can bend the steel but not its meaning.”

    Although the statement was not extremely clear, Ardoino has related it to Bitcoin’s nature, interpreting the image as a representation of Bitcoin’s resistant nature.

    Ardoino stirs debate

    Ardoino’s interpretation of the image has received mixed reactions across the crypto community as some commentators agreed that the image is significant in representing Bitcoin’s true nature as being resistant.

    However, others have criticized the leading cryptocurrency as some named it as a scam even as Bitcoin continues to show signs of a major recovery.

    Nonetheless, the criticism was outweighed by more supportive remarks from other commentators as one user described the piece as one of the most concept-connecting sculptures they had ever seen.

    Also, another commentator further stressed that everything else eventually bends, suggesting that Bitcoin endures even in the face of pressure.

    Bitcoin stabilizes at $75,000

    Ardoino’s bullish comment about Bitcoin has come following a recent price rally that has seen the asset surpass the long-lost $75,000 level.

    While this has reignited market optimism, investor confidence is growing stronger, and experts are reaffirming their bullish stance on the asset.

    While the rally has cooled and cryptocurrencies are currently showing mixed price action, Bitcoin remains stable around the $75,000 mark.

  • Justin Sun Makes an Unusual Offer to the Hacker Involved in the $290 Million Hack

    Justin Sun Makes an Unusual Offer to the Hacker Involved in the $290 Million Hack

    While the turmoil caused by the KelpDAO-related security vulnerability crisis in the DeFi ecosystem continues, a notable statement came from Justin Sun, a leading figure in the cryptocurrency world.

    Sun, in a statement on social media, directly challenged the perpetrator, offering to negotiate. “KelpDAO hacker, how much do you want? Let’s talk. Of course, with the help of KelpDAO,” Sun said, arguing that the situation needed to be resolved before it escalated further.

    In his statement, Sun pointed out that the attack could have serious consequences for both Aave and KelpDAO, saying, “It’s not worth risking both Aave and KelpDAO because of this hack.” He also alluded to the alleged theft of approximately $300 million in assets, adding, “You can’t spend $300 million anyway,” sending an indirect message to the attacker.

    Related News A Bullish Signal Seen in XRP for the First Time in Three Months

    Sun’s move has brought back into focus the “white-hat consensus” method seen in previous major DeFi attacks. As you may recall, the exploit on KelpDAO’s rsETH bridge resulted in billions of dollars worth of ETH being withdrawn from Aave, creating significant liquidity pressure on the protocol.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Elizabeth Warren Accuses SEC Chair Paul Atkins of Potentially Lying to Congress

    Elizabeth Warren Accuses SEC Chair Paul Atkins of Potentially Lying to Congress

    In brief

    • Elizabeth Warren accused Paul Atkins of potentially misleading Congress about the SEC’s falling enforcement activity.
    • New data showed the SEC brought far fewer cases under the Trump administration than historical averages.
    • Warren says the decline raises concerns about investor protection and political favoritism.

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), the highest-ranking Democrat on the powerful Senate Banking Committee, formally accused the head of the SEC this week of potentially lying to Congress—an illegal act punishable with imprisonment.

    In a letter sent Wednesday, Warren told SEC Chair Paul Atkins she believes the regulator may have intentionally misled the Banking Committee during a February 12 hearing, when Atkins was pressed about the SEC’s plummeting number of new enforcement actions under the second Trump administration.

    Atkins responded to Warren’s question at the time by saying he disagreed “with the premise” of her inquiry. When Warren followed up on the matter at a later point in the hearing, Atkins said he wasn’t sure what data the senator was referencing.

    Last week, however, the SEC released its enforcement data for 2025, which showed the regulator only brought 456 new enforcement actions last year—200 of which were filed by the outgoing Biden administration. The 256 cases brought by the Trump SEC pale in comparison to the 765 enforcement actions brought on average by the SEC every year over the last decade. 

    “The data showing a sharp decline in enforcement actions under your watch, significant reduction in staff and the sudden leadership changes all raise serious questions about the Commission’s willingness and capacity to protect investors and the markets,” Warren said.

    The SEC declined comment when reached by Decrypt.

    The crime of making a materially false statement to a congressional committee is punishable by a fine and up to five years in prison. Such a charge would need to be brought by the Department of Justice, however, and it is very unlikely the Trump DOJ would pursue such a case against a member of the Trump administration.

    Should Democrats retake Congress in November’s midterms, however, Warren could end up well-positioned to make Atkins’ life much more difficult in the medium-term. The crypto-skeptical lawmaker is likely to become the next chair of the Banking Committee should Democrats win back the Senate, an outcome currently standing at 55% odds on Polymarket.

    The SEC’s enforcement statistics are currently a hot-button issue for Democrats, given how they play into a larger narrative about the Trump administration’s appetite to pursue potential bad actors in financial markets—even those who may have ties to the president’s family and inner circle.

    The SEC under Trump has proudly touted its decrease in enforcement actions, tying the trend to a de-emphasis on crypto cases. Atkins has repeatedly argued the Biden-era SEC overzealously pursued cases against companies in the novel sector, a trend he has aggressively reversed.

    But the SEC’s enforcement rates have also dwindled across other sectors, including the traditional securities market. Further, the regulator has come under scrutiny for its treatment of entrepreneurs in the Trump family’s orbit. In Wednesday’s letter, Warren referenced a Reuters report detailing how the SEC’s head of enforcement resigned last month in part due to frustrations over the agency’s handling of fraud cases touching on President Trump’s inner circle.

    Atkins personally resisted pushes to pursue such cases, according to the report.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Stablecoins can help businesses turn costs into revenue, Paxos Labs cofounder says

    Stablecoins can help businesses turn costs into revenue, Paxos Labs cofounder says

    Stablecoins, the $300 billion class of digital dollars, may have started as a faster way to move money across the globe, but companies are now asking a different question: what can they actually do with them?

    That shift is driving a new phase of adoption, according to Chunda McCain, co-founder of Paxos Labs, who says the industry is moving beyond basic infrastructure toward real business use cases.

    “The first step was getting a stablecoin,” McCain said in an interview with CoinDesk. “The next question is: what now?”

    Last week, Paxos Labs underscored that direction by raising $12 million in a strategic funding round led by Blockchain Capital, with participation from Robot Ventures, Maelstrom and Uniswap. The lab unit was incubated under Paxos, the New York-based digital asset firm behind popular stablecoins such as PayPal’s $PYUSD ($PYUSD) and the Global Dollar (USDG). Paxos itself builds stablecoins and the immediate underlying infrastructure, while Paxos Labs intends to build tooling for further use of those stablecoins.

    With the fresh funds, Paxos Labs is building what it calls a “financial utility stack” that lets companies turn digital assets into products through a single integration.

    Its newly launched Amplify Suite bundles three core tools: Earn, which offers yield on digital assets; Borrow, which enables lending against them; and Mint, which supports branded stablecoin issuance. The idea behind that is to let firms integrate tokens into a business, then layer on capabilities over time.

    Turning cost into revenue

    For years, enterprise crypto adoption focused on “first-touch” capabilities like trading, custody or issuing a stablecoin. Those steps opened the door but rarely generated returns on their own, according to McCain

    “Stablecoins [have been] loss leaders for years,” he said.

    The opportunity lies in how those assets are used. Payments are a clear example: merchants typically give up 2% to 3% in fees, while stablecoin rails can reduce those costs and even generate yield on balances held onchain.

    “You turn what has always been a cost into revenue,” he said.

    Some of the more novel use cases sit at the intersection of payments and credit. Payment providers already track merchant revenues and cash flow, which puts them in a position to underwrite loans, McCain argued.

    That could allow merchants to access financing based on real-time performance, while earning yield on incoming payments and settling instantly across borders. These models are still early, but the building blocks are starting to come together, he said.

    Not every firm needs its own token

    To capture these benefits, not every firm needs its own stablecoin.

    While companies like PayPal have launched branded tokens to control payments and margins, issuing one requires significant investment in liquidity, compliance and distribution.

    “If you just need the economics, you don’t need to build your own,” McCain said.

    Many firms can instead integrate existing stablecoins and still benefit from lower costs and added yield.

    The shift may lack the hype when big firms like Western Union announce their own token, but it carries tangible impact on how businesses operate.

    Stablecoins are starting to reshape margins, unlock credit and change how money moves globally, especially where traditional systems remain costly or slow.

    “It might sound boring, but this is the math,” McCain said.

  • Hacking Crisis Escalates: Record Outflows from Aave

    Hacking Crisis Escalates: Record Outflows from Aave

    The KelpDAO-related security breach crisis in the cryptocurrency market has led to a significant liquidity shock in DeFi protocols. According to recent data, large-scale $ETH outflows have occurred via Aave, while investor confidence is visibly weakening.

    According to information shared by the on-chain analytics platform Lookonchain, the KelpDAO exploit resulted in a “bad debt” on Aave after the attacker withdrew $ETH from the system using rsETH collateral. This development triggered panic selling, particularly among large investors.

    Related News Analyst Claims Selling Pressure on XRP’s Twin Altcoin May Have Eased

    According to the data, a total of over $5.4 billion worth of $ETH was withdrawn from the platform. During this period, it was reported that Justin Sun, a leading figure in the cryptocurrency market, also withdrew approximately 65,584 $ETH (approximately $154 million).

    Following these intense outflows, Aave’s $ETH usage reached 100%. This indicates that the protocol’s available liquidity has been largely depleted and that new borrowing capacity may be severely limited.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Aave records $6 billion TVL drop as Kelp hack exposes structural risk at DeFi lender

    Aave records $6 billion TVL drop as Kelp hack exposes structural risk at DeFi lender

    Aave just watched $6.6 billion walk out the door, and it’s not because anyone hacked Aave.

    The protocol’s total value locked dropped from $26.4 billion on April 18 to nearly $20 billion in U.S. morning hours on Sunday, per DefiLlama. The $AAVE token fell 16% to $92, and daily fees spiked to $1.99 million as liquidations ripped through the weekend.

    Depositors are running because Aave is carrying a hole it did not create. When attackers drained 116,500 rsETH from Kelp’s bridge on Saturday, they dumped the stolen tokens on Aave V3 as collateral and borrowed wrapped ether against them.

    On-chain trackers put the Aave-specific borrow at roughly $196 million, with total positions across Aave, Compound and Euler around $236 million.

    Aave is the largest lending protocol in DeFi, where users deposit crypto to earn yield and other users borrow against collateral. Kelp is a liquid restaking protocol, which takes ether that has already been staked on Ethereum and routes it through a separate yield-generating system called EigenLayer, issuing a receipt token called rsETH in exchange.

    That rsETH is what users trade and, critically, what some users posted on Aave as collateral to borrow against.

    On Saturday, attackers tricked Kelp’s cross-chain bridge into releasing 116,500 rsETH, about $292 million worth, to an address they controlled. They then deposited that stolen rsETH onto Aave V3 as collateral and borrowed wrapped ether against it.

    A bridge is a blockchain-based took that transfers tokens between different networks, where they may not be originally supported.

    Aave first said the Umbrella reserve would cover any deficit. By Saturday afternoon the language had softened to “explore paths to offset the deficit.” That is not how a protocol talks when it knows how much it owes and has the money to pay it.

    The concentration explains why the damage lands here. Aave’s loan book spans 22 chains, but Ethereum alone holds $14.24 billion of the $17.82 billion in outstanding borrows. WETH is 39.49% of all loans on the protocol, meaning the attack hit the exact collateral-to-WETH pair that dominates Aave’s book.

    Stani Kulechov, Aave’s founder, said the exploit was external and the protocol’s contracts were not compromised. But Aave accepted a liquid restaking token as collateral, and that token’s backing vanished on a bridge Aave does not control. The depositors lose either way.

    Liquid restaking tokens were whitelisted across every major lending protocol because they carried yield and represented growing share of Ethereum’s locked value.

    The risk models priced them as if they would hold peg under normal conditions. However, none of them priced a scenario where the collateral goes to zero because a bridge on a chain Aave does not touch got exploited on a Saturday.

    $AAVE is the backbone of DeFi, has billions in there, and pretty much every single new DeFi infrastructure on new chains is a fork of it,” trader Altcoin Sherpa wrote on X. “When $AAVE has contagion risk, it shows the fragility of the entire system.”

    What the token price is trying to answer now is whether Umbrella is big enough to cover the hole, and whether stkAAVE holders who back that reserve are about to eat the loss.

  • Nexchain Launches AI-Powered Smart Actions – The Future of Autonomous Blockchain Infrastructure

    Nexchain has developed its new product named Smart Actions, a series of intelligent modules which will help blockchain networks transition from manual and reactive systems to autonomous and self-optimizing ecosystems. With this announcement, Nexchain demonstrates their commitment to transitioning towards an Intelligent Web3. In the future, ML-based models will take care of all the work required to manage and govern networks instead of a human-run committee or their rigid and inflexible smart contracts.

    Autonomic Governance and Resource Elasticity

    The introduction of AI governance forms a crucial pillar to the Smart Actions of Nexchain’s platform. Historically, DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) had to rely on slow manual processes, leading to a lot of friction associated with drafting proposals and experiencing voter fatigue from many lengthy proposals having been made at any one time. By creating real-time evaluations of proposals and analyzing voting patterns, Nexchain’s modules are designed to provide>Scaling Transaction Speed Through AI-Driven Verification

    Nexchain addresses the blockchain trilemma, including security, scalability, and decentralization, through its use of AI-powered verification. When there is a sudden spike in demand, the conventional nodes may fail to finalize the transactions leading to high fees or even network collapse.

    The Nexchain system has intelligent modules that can predictively load balance and optimize transaction settlement and validation. Thus, the Nexchain network can maintain high levels of throughput while at the same time ensuring that the validation process remains secure. Recent industry analysis suggests that the use of AI technology is quickly becoming common within the next generation of Layer-1 and Layer-2 technologies. Experts at CoinDesk believe that AI technology can act as a “shield” for smart contracts by enabling users to seek out possible vulnerabilities before they can be exploited.

    Strengthening the Web3 Ecosystem

    The emergence of Smart Actions signifies a broader movement towards cross-sector integration via Web3. The Nexchain brain could serve as the foundation for these specific application types, while ensuring that the underlying network is able to support the complexity of multi-faceted dApps.

    Conclusion

    Smart Actions from Nexchain is a huge step forward for a blockchain that is both resilient and more aware than ever before. Nexchain has established a new standard for what a “modern” blockchain can look like through the ability to repair and optimize itself without needing a human to make any manual interventions. Additionally, as AIs continue developing and becoming more intelligent, the line between smart contracts and intelligent actions will likely establish the standard for measuring success within the decentralized ecosystem.

  • 4AI and AquaFlux Partner to Connect AI Agents to Real-World Asset Yield

    4AI and AquaFlux Partner to Connect AI Agents to Real-World Asset Yield

    4AI and AquaFlux have partnered to put decentralized AI agents to work optimizing real-world asset yield. 4AI handles the agent marketplace on BSC. AquaFlux handles the RWA protocol and the tri-token structure that lets the yield vary by risk tier. Together, they’re making agents active participants in yield decisions rather than background infrastructure.

    We’re partnering with @AquaFluxPro to unlock the next layer of onchain intelligence by combining decentralized AI agents with structured RWA yield.

    🔸 Decentralized AI marketplace enabling anyone to build and deploy intelligent agents
    🔸 Tri-token (P/C/S) model bringing flexible… pic.twitter.com/0jZaYCXZCY

    — 4AI 🔶 BNB (@4aibsc) April 18, 2026

    What 4AI Actually Does

    4AI is a marketplace on Binance Smart Chain where anyone can build and deploy AI agents. Backed by 0x Labs, the idea is that you shouldn’t need to be a major institution or a specialized developer to create an intelligent agent. Request what you need, someone builds it, you deploy it. Agents become reusable building blocks instead of custom tools you have to commission from scratch each time.

    An agent trained to optimize yield strategies can be requested, built, and deployed by users who need exactly that capability without maintaining their own AI infrastructure.

    How the Tri-Token Model Changes Everything

    AquaFlux’s three-token structure brings real flexibility to RWA markets that have historically been fragmented and illiquid. Different tokens represent different risk and yield tiers. When you add AI agents that can analyze yields across those tiers and move capital between them in real time, the whole thing becomes smarter.

    An AI agent connected to AquaFlux moves capital between risk tiers automatically, based on market conditions and yields. It’s fast in ways manual management never will be. It has the intelligence tools to optimize decisions and the onchain infrastructure to execute them atomically.

    How the Partnership Works in Practice

    The onchain risk engine that AquaFlux operates becomes the decision-making framework for AI agents optimizing yield strategies.

    Rather than agents operating on general instructions or historical patterns, they have access to a structured risk assessment model that’s transparent, verifiable, and continuously updated based on onchain data.

    An AI agent trying to maximize yield for a user can now evaluate RWA opportunities through AquaFlux’s risk framework, understand the composability options across the three-token model, and execute rebalancing decisions that balance yield with risk in real time. The agent knows how to optimize and it knows how to act.

    Why This Bridge Matters for DeFi and RWAs

    The separation between DeFi and RWA markets has created inefficiencies where capital doesn’t flow freely to the highest risk-adjusted returns because the two markets operate with different infrastructure, different custody models, and different user bases. Intelligent agents that can operate across both and make allocation decisions based on unified yield metrics begin to break down those inefficiencies.

    For users, that means yield optimization that’s smarter and faster than doing it manually. AquaFlux’s RWA yield now reaches DeFi’s liquidity. Capital allocation happens through agents instead of sitting fragmented across separate infrastructure.

    Conclusion

    4AI and AquaFlux are connecting decentralized AI agents with structured RWA yield in a partnership that brings automated, intelligent capital allocation to real-world asset markets. AI agents can now evaluate RWA opportunities through AquaFlux’s tri-token framework and execute yield optimization decisions in real time onchain.

    The partnership connects two markets that have historically operated separately by giving agents the tools to work across both at the same

  • Inside the rise of wrench attacks against crypto holders and how France has become the focus

    Inside the rise of wrench attacks against crypto holders and how France has become the focus

    France is facing a rise in crypto-related kidnappings as so-called “wrench attacks” become more frequent, brazen and violent.

    That shift was visible this week amid the staging of an annual international blockchain and crypto conference. A police motorcade escorted VIP guests to a dinner at the Palace of Versailles. And security was also notably reinforced at the Carrousel du Louver, where the conference was taking place.

    Wrench attacks in France have put the country so notably under the international spotlight that government officials took the stage at the conference in Paris to acknowledge their alarm at the scale of the problem. They said that this year alone, the country has suffered at least 41 crypto-related kidnappings and home invasions. That’s one every two to three days.

    Jean-Didier Berger, Minister Delegate to the Interior Ministry, said a new set of measures is being prepared with Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez to tackle the growing issue. A prevention platform has already drawn thousands of registrations, but authorities say further steps are needed as incidents continue to rise.

    Wrench attack epicenter

    The country has become the epicenter of a global rise in wrench attacks. Across multiple jurisdictions, attacks on crypto holders are becoming more frequent and more violent, according to security researchers and law enforcement data.

    Globally, the trend is also on the rise. In 2025, there were 72 verified physical coercion incidents globally, a 75% increase from the previous year, according to Certik and crypto researcher Jameson Lopp’s data, which tracks 188 attacks since 2014. Many more go unreported, he said. Cases involving physical assault rose even faster, up 250% year-over-year.

    The term “wrench attack” refers to the use of physical force to extract access to digital assets. For some attackers, it is easier to coerce a person than to break encryption.

    “Every time a wrench attack is successful, it tells the world that crypto owners are juicy targets,” Lopp told CoinDesk.

    Unlike traditional bank transfers, crypto transactions cannot be reversed. Once a victim authorizes a transfer under duress, the funds can be moved quickly across wallets and chains.

    Attackers seek points of weakness

    Researchers say the way attackers identify victims has also changed.

    “We’re seeing a shift from ‘find a wallet’ to ‘hunt a person,’” Phil Ariss of TRM Labs told CoinDesk. Rather than scanning for technical vulnerabilities, attackers build profiles, he added. They look at social media activity, public appearances and leaked datasets. They track routines and identify points of weakness.

    “The biggest avoidable mistake is tying real-world identity, location and routine too tightly to visible crypto wealth,” Ariss said.

    The problem is exacerbated when attackers get a helping hand from government officials. In one widely known case, in which a French tax official sold wrench attackers sensitive data. The case raised concerns among security experts that insider leaks and compromised state data were feeding directly into wrench attacks.

    The pool of potential victims has widened, with mid-level holders increasingly being targeted, sometimes based on limited or indirect signals.

    Anybody is a potential victim

    Cases now include families, with children targeted alongside crypto-holding parents, making the attacks harder to categorize by severity.

    In January 2025, Ledger co-founder David Balland was kidnapped in France along with his partner. During the attack, one of his fingers was severed and sent to associates as part of a ransom demand. He was rescued after a police operation.

    Other cases have involved prolonged captivity and torture, such as one in New York, where a crypto investor was held for more than two weeks. In Canada, a home invasion escalated into waterboarding and sexual violence as attackers attempted to force access to funds.

    Lopp said both opportunistic and organized groups are involved, but there are signs of increasing coordination. “We do seem to be seeing more organized groups now,” he said.

    TRM Labs’s Ariss says his team has observed similar patterns, noting some groups operate with defined roles and pre-planning, including surveillance and follow-home tactics.

    “These look less like one-off robberies and more like small kidnap or robbery crews specializing in crypto jobs,” Ariss said.

    After funds are obtained, attackers tend to move quickly and frequently the crypto assets they attain are converted into stablecoins and routed across multiple chains, making recovery more difficult.

    France’s role in this trend may reflect a mix of factors, Lopp said, including cases involving leaked personal data and cross-border criminal networks.

    Rising prices, heftier loot

    More broadly, rising asset prices have increased the potential payoff from a single attack, while improvements in digital security have reduced the effectiveness of purely technical exploits.

    “It’s far easier than trying to rob a bank,” Lopp said.

    Another issue is visibility: wrench attacks might be significantly underreported because many are reported as standard robberies or home invasions, with no mention of crypto.

    “A large share of incidents are still recorded as simple robberies,” Ariss said, adding that the crypto element is often left out at the time of reporting, which can make it harder for authorities to connect cases or identify broader patterns.

    The increase in attacks has raised questions about the risks of self-custody, a core principle of cryptocurrency.

    Some security experts point to measures such as multi-signature setups, withdrawal delays and spending limits as ways to reduce risk by limiting how much can be accessed under duress.

    “If coercion cannot produce immediate access to the majority of funds, the risk and return changes,” Ariss said. Such measures do not eliminate the threat but may reduce the incentive for attackers.

    As crypto adoption grows, attacks are becoming more frequent and severe, turning what was once a niche concern into a broader security risk.