Category: Business

  • While Bitcoin (BTC) was falling, Whales weren’t idle, they changed positions: Here are the altcoins they traded…

    While Bitcoin (BTC) was falling, Whales weren’t idle, they changed positions: Here are the altcoins they traded…

    Bitcoin has fallen by 1.4% in the last 24 hours, dropping to around $62,000. This has also affected altcoins, with other major altcoins like Ethereum and XRP also showing a decline.

    According to CoinMarketCap data, Velvet (VELVET) was the top-performing altcoin in the last 24 hours with a 38% gain. It was followed by Ether.fi (ETHFI), Cosmos (ATOM), and MemeCore (M).

    In contrast, altcoins such as Venice Token (VVV), LayerZero (ZRO), and Lighter (LIT) were among the biggest losers.

    While the altcoin market experienced both rises and falls, whale activity continued.

    According to Lookonchain, a cryptocurrency analysis platform, a whale with the address 0x117f traded in the altcoin $ASTER. Specifically, the whale opened a 4x long position of 7.2 million $ASTER ($4.33 million) and staked 4.02 million $ASTER ($2.42 million) for four years.

    Another whale, with the address 19pFLW, bought another 300 Bitcoin (worth $19.03 million) approximately five hours ago, increasing his Bitcoin holdings to 1,120 (worth $70.43 million).

    According to Lookonchain’s report, another whale traded in the altcoin $HYPE. This whale, who had previously sold $HYPE, this time sold 923,743 $HYPE (worth $53.02 million). Initially holding 2.93 million $HYPE (worth $163.37 million), this whale had sold 1.03 million $HYPE (worth $57.44 million) approximately two weeks ago. With this latest sale, they still hold 969,595 $HYPE (worth $55.5 million).

    Finally, Lookonchain reported that address 0x66f8, known as the largest on-chain BTC bear, closed its $136 million short position, making a profit of $1.65 million. Following this profit-taking, this whale moved into a long position in Bitcoin with 40x leverage.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Israel’s largest bank to offer crypto trading with Galaxy

    Israel’s largest bank to offer crypto trading with Galaxy

    Bank Leumi, Israel’s largest bank, will offer cryptocurrency trading to customers from early 2027 becoming the first Israeli bank to announce such a service.

    Customers of Leumi and its mobile banking unit, Pepper, will be able to buy, hold and sell bitcoin BTC$62,880.24, ether ETH$1,875.38 and solana (SOL) through a section of the Leumi Trade app, according to a Friday announcement.

    Galaxy Digital (GLXY) will provide trading and services through GalaxyOne Institutional, its platform for banks and asset managers. Leumi has also signed an agreement to use Galaxy’s custody infrastructure, formerly known as GK8, to support the offering.

    The tie-up gives Galaxy a banking partner in Israel and places Leumi among a growing group of financial institutions bringing crypto access inside customer platforms. By embedding trading within its capital-markets app, the bank is betting that clients will favor a regulated banking interface over standalone crypto exchanges.

    Maya Ravia, Leumi’s head of strategy, described digital assets as an increasingly integral part of the global financial system. Galaxy Israel CEO Lior Lamesh said early movers among banks would help define finance’s shift toward open, programmable infrastructure.

    The companies did not disclose commercial terms, fees or customer eligibility requirements. CoinDesk has reached out to Bank Leumi for further comments.

  • Strategy says MSCI should measure markets, not dictate corporate assets

    Strategy says MSCI should measure markets, not dictate corporate assets

    Strategy (MSTR) has pushed back against MSCI’s proposed methodology for identifying “non-operating companies,” which could result in the largest bitcoin treasury company being removed from the index provider’s global equity indexes.

    Strategy said on X, “Digital assets are assets. Index providers should measure markets, not decide which assets companies are allowed to own,” Strategy said. “MSCI’s proposal puts it out of step with regulators, markets, and its own customers. Bitcoin doesn’t need MSCI. Neither does Strategy.”

    The latest consultation replaces an earlier proposal focused specifically on companies with significant digital asset holdings. Applying the new financial-ratio screen using May 2026 data would have resulted in the removal of Strategy, Metaplanet and uranium holder Yellow Cake from the MSCI ACWI IMI.

    The response follows Strategy’s formal objection in December 2025 to MSCI’s previous proposal, which would have excluded companies whose digital assets represented at least 50% of total assets.

    Strategy argued at the time that it is an operating company, not an investment fund or passive bitcoin vehicle, pointing to its software business, active treasury operations and bitcoin-backed credit instruments. It described the 50% threshold as arbitrary and urged MSCI to maintain neutral index standards.

    MSTR is lower by 4.3% on Friday as bitcoin dips to $62,600.

  • ‘Bitcoin Is Burning’: Red Team Turns to Chinese AI to Find Flaws

    ‘Bitcoin Is Burning’: Red Team Turns to Chinese AI to Find Flaws

    In brief

    • The Bitcoin Red Team is using Chinese AI models to search Bitcoin projects for security flaws.
    • Calle said developers have confirmed numerous critical and high-severity vulnerabilities.
    • They warned that unmaintained projects should not be trusted.

    The Bitcoin Red Team is using Chinese AI models to search nearly the entire Bitcoin open-source ecosystem for security flaws, according to pseudonymous developer and Red Team lead Calle.

    The volunteer group combines AI tools with human review to examine wallets, Lightning applications, software libraries, and other Bitcoin projects. Researchers privately report credible findings to developers so the flaws can be fixed before details are released.

    Myriad: Bitcoin's next move? Click to make your prediction.
    Myriad: Bitcoin’s next move? Click to make your prediction.

    “We’re experiencing a massive collision between decades of human open source slop against 2 weeks of Kimi K3,” Calle wrote Thursday on X. “Everything is broken, Bitcoin is burning.”

    Kimi K3 is an AI model from Chinese startup Moonshot AI that developers can download and run on their own systems. It can analyze large codebases and complete lengthy software tasks with little supervision.

    The Bitcoin Red Team has also used Chinese developer Z.ai’s GLM 5.2, as well as models from OpenAI and Anthropic. American models, though, come with limitations, and developers frequently run up against restrictions imposed by OpenAI and Anthropic when doing security research. “Red team rugged by OpenAI cyber again,” Calle posted earlier this week. “Don’t like asking for permission. Loading up Kiimi K3.”

    Nevertheless, the developer noted that the team is making progress, even if slow and painful.

    “We’ve basically completed a basic scan of virtually the entirety of Bitcoin open source,” Calle wrote. “The low hanging fruit is done.”

    In August, the group reported filing 4,962 findings across 390 projects, including 85 rated critical and 635 rated high severity. Calle said developers had confirmed “a ton of real critical and high vulnerabilities,” though the group has not named the affected projects or released technical details.

    “Response speed is very different across projects and shows how healthy each project is,” they wrote. “I recommend acting fast these days.”

    Lightning software, which supports faster and cheaper Bitcoin payments, was particularly difficult to review because of its complexity, Calle said, calling it “more broken than the average.”

    “Those projects that started AI audits months ago are in a completely different position than those who didn’t,” he wrote. “Projects need their own AI audit pipeline going into the future.”

    Calle also warned against relying on unmaintained projects and said AI has made it more stressful for developers to keep their software secure.

    The Bitcoin Red Team is not alone. Last month, Hugging Face used China’s GLM 5.2 to investigate a breach after OpenAI models hacked into its systems and U.S. commercial models refused to analyze the attack logs.

    Despite saying Bitcoin is “burning,” Calle argued that the audits are making its software stronger.

    “Bitcoin is the obvious first target, but the rest of the world will follow shortly,” Calle wrote. “Sometimes old things need to burn so new things can grow on healthy soil.”

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Former SEC Official: Crypto Rulemaking Can Begin Before CLARITY Act Passage

    Former SEC Official: Crypto Rulemaking Can Begin Before CLARITY Act Passage

    Anne Kelly, a former official at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has stated that the agency does not need to wait for the passage of the CLARITY Act to begin rulemaking for digital assets. In a post on X, Kelly emphasized that the SEC can initiate rulemaking proactively, and if the CLARITY Act is later enacted, its provisions can be incorporated through additional rule proposals.

    Understanding the CLARITY Act and Its Timeline

    The CLARITY Act, which aims to clarify the regulatory status of digital assets, has been a topic of debate in Congress. However, even if the bill were to pass immediately, it would still take several months for the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to draft detailed implementation rules. Kelly’s remarks highlight a pragmatic approach: rather than waiting for legislative action, regulators can begin the process now, ensuring a smoother transition once the law is finalized.

    Implications for the Crypto Industry

    For the cryptocurrency industry, this signals a potential acceleration in regulatory clarity. Market participants have long sought clear guidelines on how digital assets are classified and regulated. By starting rulemaking earlier, the SEC could provide much-needed direction, reducing uncertainty for businesses and investors. Kelly’s perspective underscores that Congress and regulators are partners in this effort, not adversaries, and that collaboration can lead to more effective oversight.

    Why This Matters

    The timeline for crypto regulation has been a point of contention, with industry advocates pushing for faster action and regulators emphasizing the need for thorough deliberation. Kelly’s comments suggest that a proactive approach could bridge this gap, allowing the SEC to address key issues while Congress continues its work. For stakeholders, this could mean earlier clarity on compliance requirements, potentially fostering innovation while ensuring investor protection.

    Conclusion

    As the debate over crypto regulation continues, the possibility of the SEC moving forward with rulemaking independent of the CLARITY Act offers a constructive path forward. While the legislative process is essential, regulators have the tools to begin shaping the framework now. This development could mark a significant step toward a more defined regulatory environment for digital assets in the United States.

    FAQs

    Q1: What is the CLARITY Act?
    The CLARITY Act is a proposed U.S. law designed to clarify the regulatory status of digital assets, determining which are securities and which are commodities, and assigning oversight to the SEC or CFTC accordingly.

    Q2: Can the SEC really start rulemaking before the CLARITY Act passes?
    Yes, according to former SEC official Anne Kelly. The SEC has existing authority to propose rules for digital assets, and any later legislative changes can be incorporated through additional rulemaking.

    Q3: How long would implementation take after the CLARITY Act passes?
    Even if passed immediately, it would likely take several months for the SEC and CFTC to draft and finalize detailed rules, given the complexity of the subject and the need for public comment periods.

  • Figure Q2 profit jumps 192% as loan volume reaches $4.3B

    Figure Q2 profit jumps 192% as loan volume reaches $4.3B

    Figure Technology Solutions reported $4.26 billion in Consumer Loan Marketplace volume for the second quarter on Aug. 13, up 132% from a year earlier and 47% from the first quarter.

    The Nasdaq-listed blockchain lending company also reported net income of $87.4 million, up 192%, while net revenue more than doubled to $225.6 million.

    The results mark Figure’s strongest quarter since becoming a public company and show a growing share of activity moving through its capital-light marketplace model. Figure Connect accounted for $2.77 billion, or 65%, of total consumer loan marketplace volume, compared with $767 million a year earlier.

    Figure Connect now handles 65% of marketplace volume

    Figure Connect volume rose 262% year over year in Q2. The marketplace, launched in June 2024, connects third-party loan sellers and buyers using Figure’s blockchain-based infrastructure. Figure defines Connect volume as consumer loans originated by third-party sellers through the marketplace.

    That distinction matters when interpreting the headline $4.3 billion figure. Consumer Loan Marketplace volume also includes HELOC, debt-service coverage ratio and personal loan originations through Figure’s loan origination system. It should not be read as $4.3 billion of blockchain trades alone.

    The shift toward third-party activity supports Figure’s push for a business requiring less balance-sheet capital. Ecosystem and technology fees rose to $72.9 million from $28.1 million, while gain on loan sales increased to $57.6 million from $36.3 million. Figure Connect itself represented nearly two-thirds of marketplace volume.

    Figure also added 102 origination partners during the quarter, taking its active network to 489 across mortgage banks, depositories, servicers and fintech companies. Operations and processing costs fell to roughly 67 basis points of marketplace volume from 79 basis points one year earlier.

    Figure profit grows faster than revenue

    Net revenue rose 113% year over year to $225.6 million, while net income increased from $30 million to $87.4 million. The net income margin expanded from 28.3% to 38.8%. Operating income also rose to $77.7 million from $27.7 million, showing the profit increase was not solely the result of below-the-line accounting items.

    Adjusted EBITDA reached $119.4 million, up 126%, while adjusted EBITDA margin expanded to 54.6% from 47.2%. Figure’s presentation sets a medium-term adjusted EBITDA margin target of 60% for 2026 through 2028. The 60% figure is a management target, not a guaranteed outcome.

    The balance sheet also expanded. Cash and cash equivalents, excluding restricted cash, reached $1.4 billion at June 30, up $239.4 million from year-end. Loans held for sale increased 47.7% to $597 million.

    Blockchain lending products expand beyond home equity

    Figure’s growth is increasingly coming from products outside its original home-equity business. Small and medium-sized business loan volume grew 57% from the first quarter, while third-party borrowing on its Democratized Prime onchain lending marketplace reached about $170 million as of Aug. 6, roughly 23 times its year-end level.

    Its regulated digital asset business also continued to scale. YLDS in circulation stood at $556 million at June 30, compared with $328 million at the end of 2025. Figure’s SEC-registered yield-bearing YLDS token expanded beyond Provenance to Sui, adding another route for the company’s tokenized financial products.

    Figure is also expanding its underlying loan inventory. As crypto.news reported, the company agreed to acquire real-estate lender Kiavi for $717 million, a transaction expected to add residential transition and DSCR loans to Figure’s marketplaces. Figure said Thursday the acquisition remains on track to close during the second half of 2026.

    Figure closed a $600 million offering of 8.5% senior notes due 2031 on July 14, with proceeds intended in part to fund the Kiavi transaction. The acquisition still depends on closing conditions and required regulatory approvals.

    Q3 guidance points to another volume increase

    Figure expects Consumer Loan Marketplace volume of $4.8 billion to $5.2 billion in the third quarter. At the midpoint, the company’s investor presentation says that would represent roughly 102% growth from a year earlier. The guidance is forward-looking and depends on lending demand, funding markets and other operating assumptions.

    CEO Michael Tannenbaum said weekly loan applications had exceeded $1 billion by July and said the pending Kiavi acquisition “will significantly grow our platform into adjacent asset classes.” The latter remains a company expectation until the acquisition closes and integration begins.

    Investors responded positively to the earnings session. FIGR closed Aug. 13 at $31.88, up 3.94%, after trading between $29.50 and $33.77 during the day.

    The next milestones are Figure’s weekly operating updates, Q3 marketplace performance and completion of the Kiavi acquisition. The Aug. 13 filing furnished the quarterly earnings release to the SEC.

  • Neutrl pauses NUSD redemptions over undisclosed reserve issue

    Neutrl pauses NUSD redemptions over undisclosed reserve issue

    Decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol Neutrl has suspended minting and redemptions for its NUSD synthetic dollar after unspecified circumstances affected protocol reserves, leaving the cause and scale of any potential impairment unclear.

    On Thursday, Neutrl said it had also paused other protocol functions on legal advice while it assesses the impact. The protocol did not identify the affected asset or counterparty, say whether reserves suffered a realized loss or provide a timeline for resuming operations.

    Structured-yield protocol Strata later said it paused minting, redemptions and related functions for contracts in its Neutrl market, which supports several NUSD-linked products. Strata said its other markets remained operational.

    With about $53.6 million in NUSD in circulation, the suspension prevents approved counterparties from exchanging the token for its backing assets while Neutrl determines whether its reserves have been impaired. Neutrl said it would provide timing and next steps when available.

    Cointelegraph contacted Neutrl for comment but had not received a response by publication.

    NUSD supply falls 18% over 30 days

    According to RWA.xyz, NUSD had a market capitalization of about $53.6 million on Friday, down 18.4% over 30 days, while monthly transfer volume fell 72.4% to $71.4 million. However, the data does not establish that the earlier contraction was related to the reserve issue.

    The synthetic dollar is designed to track the US dollar using yield-bearing crypto assets and market-neutral strategies rather than deposits held in a bank. RWA.xyz showed NUSD trading at about $0.9984, with 615 holders and 347 active addresses over the preceding 30 days.

    On May 25, verification platform Accountable said its Neutrl dashboard provided continuous cryptographic proof that NUSD reserves matched the protocol’s liabilities.

    A February assessment by risk-advisory team BA Labs nevertheless classified a proposed Neutrl integration as higher risk because of counterparty, operational and liquidity exposure. It said direct redemptions were limited to KYC or KYB-approved counterparties and that requests exceeding the liquid buffer could enter a queue targeted for completion within 48 hours, without a guarantee.

    BA Labs estimated NUSD supply at $226 million and reserves at $233.7 million at the time, implying a 103.6% collateralization ratio. It said more than 87% of reserves were held through Fireblocks, while smaller amounts sat on centralized exchanges.

  • Anthropic Is Quietly Watermarking Every Claude AI Output. Builders Are Already Trying to Break It

    Anthropic Is Quietly Watermarking Every Claude AI Output. Builders Are Already Trying to Break It

    In brief

    • New Claude models launched in the EU on or after August 2, 2026 embed a machine-readable watermark in every piece of generated text, applied at the model level.
    • The markings apply worldwide across Claude, the API, Claude Code, and cloud partners.
    • Open-source projects to remove them appeared within days.

    Anthropic has begun embedding an imperceptible watermark in all text its newest Claude models generate. The change took effect for models launched in the EU on August 2, 2026, and Anthropic says it will apply worldwide.

    Anthropic laid out the plan in a support article after signing the EU AI Act’s Code of Practice on transparency. In other words, it’s not exactly volunteering to do this. The mark reaches every Claude surface, from the chatbot and API to Claude Code and cloud partners such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Foundry.

    Myriad: When will OpenAI release GPT-6? Click to make your prediction.
    Myriad: When will OpenAI release GPT-6? Click to make your prediction.

    “When a supported Claude model generates text, it weaves an imperceptible watermark directly into the text itself. You won’t see it, and it doesn’t change the meaning, quality, or readability of Claude’s response,” Anthropic said. “Because the watermark is part of the text, it will travel with the text when it’s copied and pasted elsewhere, and may persist through some editing.”

    So it’s a bit more complex than the usual methods users tend to think about. When a supported Claude model writes text, it weaves an imperceptible watermark directly into the words, with no visible tag. Because the mark is part of the text, it survives copy-paste and, Anthropic admits, “may persist through some editing.” Files get a second layer: signed metadata under the C2PA open standard (think a digital shipping manifest that records who produced a file and whether anyone altered it afterward).

    The method stays secret

    Anthropic hasn’t said how the watermark is made. The support article calls it model-level (the model is trained with it) and text-native (it’s not an external tool like metadata generator, for example), but the detection documentation and the exact technique aren’t out yet.

    Researchers infer it’s a statistical signature: The model nudges its word choices toward a faint, detectable bias, the same family of approach Google uses in SynthID Text. That remains a guess until Anthropic publishes the detector.

    But that isn’t pushing privacy enthusiasts back, and some experts are already working on methods to break Anthropic’s secret watermarking. mikiane/claude-watermark-cleaner (106 stars on Github) scrubs invisible Unicode, then rewrites text with a non-Claude model to disturb the token pattern.

    A larger project, guillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover (4.6k stars on Githum), strips Claude text marks plus C2PA and SynthID-class signals across PNG, JPEG, SVG, PDF, and DOCX. The authors argue a statistical text mark is “not a reliable way to prove origin” and mostly pushes users to spend a second model pass cleaning their own writing. No removal can be guaranteed until Anthropic ships its detector and thresholds.

    Anthropic’s own history makes the privacy reaction sharper. The company removed a hidden Claude Code tracker in March after researchers found it tagging some users’ location and proxy use through undisclosed Unicode markers—the same quiet-marking technique now at the center of the watermark plan.

    The mark proves Claude had a hand in text, not that it wrote the whole thing, so it will treat an original writing with a small edit the same as a fully AI-generated text. Ask Claude to proofread or translate your paragraph and the output can still carry the signal. Anthropic is upfront that heavy editing can strip it, and that a missing mark doesn’t prove a human wrote something.

    A U.S. bill, the COPIED Act, pushes the same idea: a standardized way to watermark AI content so platforms can trace its origin. As Claude’s blackmail problem showed, the company’s models already draw intense scrutiny over what they do with the text they touch.

    Anthropic hasn’t said when it will publish the detection tools that would let anyone verify the mark.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Market Experts: “85 Percent of the Bear Market in Bitcoin and Altcoins Is Over”

    Market Experts: “85 Percent of the Bear Market in Bitcoin and Altcoins Is Over”

    The DeFi Report, a cryptocurrency and macroeconomics analysis company, announced in its latest assessment of Bitcoin and the overall cryptocurrency market that the bear market has now entered its final phase. The analysis stated that approximately 85% of the bear cycle is behind us, and the remaining 15%, which will determine the market’s fate, largely depends on global macroeconomic developments.

    According to the company’s on-chain cost base analysis, the leading cryptocurrency Bitcoin is exhibiting movements quite similar to previous cycle bases in terms of on-chain data. However, it was noted that spot and futures trading volumes have fallen to their lowest levels since the end of 2019, which was described as a clear indication of a “time-spread capitulation” process taking place on the chain. Furthermore, asset sales by miners, redirecting their energy capacity to AI firms, were also cited as factors increasing pressure on the market.

    The analysis stated that whether Bitcoin will fall to the “deep value” region of $55,000 and below will depend on macroeconomic liquidity conditions in the coming weeks. The fact that US 30-year Treasury yields have surpassed 5.2%, reaching a 20-year high, and the Fed’s move towards higher interest rates were highlighted as key factors putting pressure on risky assets.

    Another notable development in global markets was the covert liquidity measures implemented by the US Treasury Department and the Bank of Japan to strengthen the Yen. Analysts described this mechanism, which allows foreign institutions to provide liquidity by collateralizing US bonds instead of selling them, as “QE Light” (Quantitative Easing). The 15% increase in gold prices due to this covert liquidity injection and the impact of global risks suggests that investors are positioning themselves against inflationary pressures, and a similar liquidity flow could shift to Bitcoin in the future.

    Analysts evaluating technical levels and strategies consider the 200-week moving average, currently at $63,800, a critical threshold. If Bitcoin closes the month above the $68,700-$69,800 range, the scenario that the bottom has been reached will gain strength.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • 44 Billion SHIB in Hours: Shiba Inu May Head for Rebound

    44 Billion SHIB in Hours: Shiba Inu May Head for Rebound

    Shiba Inu has continued to trade on a downward trajectory amid prolonged broader market volatility. However, its exchange activity over the last 24 hours has provided a different signal.

    With its price still struggling to reclaim its recent high around the $0.000005 mark, the latest data from crypto analytics platform CryptoQuant has provided investors with a glimpse of hope for a possible price recovery soon.

    44 billion $SHIB in demand

    Per the data, the Shiba Inu exchange netflow has drawn attention amid the market downturn after projecting a negative balance of 44.1 billion $SHIB as of Thursday, August 13.

    While a netflow of 44 billion $SHIB may seem modest, its timing makes it significant as it shows a major divergence between the $SHIB trading price and its exchange activity.

    Notably, the metric shows that the amount of $SHIB tokens moved out of exchanges amid growing demand is significantly greater than the amount of $SHIB returned to exchanges for sell-off purposes over the last day.

    While the difference in both activities stands at -44 billion $SHIB, it means that the amount of $SHIB available for sale on exchanges has been reduced substantially, gradually cooling the intense sell pressure facing the Shiba Inu ecosystem.

    Where’s $SHIB headed?

    Although the Shiba Inu exchange flow provides a bullish outlook for $SHIB, the asset is still struggling to recover near its recent high, consistently trading in the red zone.

    However, analysts believe there is still a chance for a potential price reversal for $SHIB if investors remain resilient and it is able to sustain demand even amid such weak market conditions.