Author: rb809rb

  • Country Joe McDonald, Woodstock Star Who Found Counterculture Fame With ‘I-Feel-Like-I’m-Fixin’-to-Die Rag,’ Dies at 84

    Country Joe McDonald, Woodstock Star Who Found Counterculture Fame With ‘I-Feel-Like-I’m-Fixin’-to-Die Rag,’ Dies at 84

    “Country Joe” McDonald, who fronted the band Country Joe and the Fish and became an emblem of the 1960s antiwar counterculture through a prominent appearance at the Woodstock festival, died Saturday at age 84.

    The singer, born Joseph Allen McDonald, died of Parkinson’s in Berkeley, according to a statement on the group’s social media and reported sources close to his wife.

    McDonald’s best known song was “I-Feel-Like-I’m-Fixin’-to-Die Rag,” a Vietnam protest song he performed at the 1969 Woodstock Festival. The performance included the infamous call-and-response “Fish Cheer,” which had the audience spelling out the F-word at McDonald’s behest.

    Born on January 1, 1942, in Washington, D.C., McDonald grew up in El Monte, California, where he played trombone with dance bands on the weekends. He joined the Navy as a teenager — serving from 1959 to 1962 — before returning to L.A. to attend state college. He moved to the Bay area in 1965, where he co-founded Country Joe and the Fish with guitarist Barry Melton in Berkeley.

    “It was suggested that the group be called Country Mao and the Fish because Mao Tse-tung said that the revolutionaries move like fish through the sea, and I said that was stupid,” he told the website Classic Bands. “It was suggested that we call it Country Joe and the Fish after Joseph Stalin.” Although, of course, he was the true “Joe” of the group’s moniker, the connection was not a big stretch: his communist parents had named him after Stalin.

    The band released its debut album, “Electric Music for the Mind and Body,” in 1967. It did not include “I-Feel-Like-I’m-Fixin’-to-Die Rag” or “The Fish Cheer,” apparently due to fears of censorship, although it did include protest songs like “Superbird,” which satirized President Lyndon Johnson. The more controversial material made it onto their second album.

    Of his famous protest song, McDonald told the Street Spirit website, “The important thing about the ‘Fixin’ to Die Rag’ was that it had a new point of view that did not blame soldiers for war. It just blamed the politicians and it blamed the manufacturers of weapons. It didn’t blame the soldiers. Someone who was in the military could sing the song, and the attitude is, ‘Whoopee, we’re all going to die.’ Most peace songs of the era blamed the soldiers for the war.” 

    Some of the Woodstock audience was already primed to join in on chanting “The Fish Cheer,” which had picked up notoriety after McDonald was charged with inciting lewd behavior for its appearance in a Massachusetts performance.

    McDonald explained the group’s origins: “I moved to Berkeley in the summer of 1965, after the Free Speech Movement. So I came up here from southern California and got miraculously tapped into the folk music thing that was happening here at that time. I met Barry Melton at the University of California folk festival, and we hit it off. I started playing a few of my songs, and he played lead guitar. We were a duo. Then I met some other people, and Ed Denson, Mike Beardslee and I started putting out a little magazine called Rag Baby… a biweekly that had music articles and schedules of things that were happening around town, music and dancing and events. It was mostly focused on folk music and the folk scene.”

    Of “Fixin’-to-Die Rag,” he said, “The only reason I could write those lyrics was having grown up in a socialist family. My parents were members of the Communist Party when I was born, but later became disenchanted with them. And then they became part of the Progressive Party and the left socialist parties that were around. I read the leftist newspapers and I was familiar with the basic tenets of socialism about the industrial complex that generates war. So I was able to write lyrics about the warmakers that profit from war, and I was able to write a lyric from the point of view of the soldier because I had been in the military.”

    Additionally, he said, “I felt disenchanted from my parents, in a way. As far as politics, we didn’t have a very good relationship, so it was easy for me to say: ‘Come on mothers throughout the land, pack your boys off to Vietnam.’ And that sarcasm was a really nice thing, and GIs love sarcasm.”

    McDonald continued to write songs addressing environmental issues and civil rights, releasing dozens of solo records after Country Joe and the Fish disbanded in 1971.

    Fifty years after writing his signature song in 1965, he sang it at an anti-nuclear protest at Livermore Laboratory on the 70th anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima. 

    In a 2016 interview, he said, “I find the concept of 50 years incomprehensible. But it’s indisputable because I have children and some of those children have children and I know that the math is right. And I just finished an album and the title of it is ’50’ because it’s 50 years since the first album. It’s called ‘Goodbye Blues.’ I didn’t die, so there you are. I’m still alive and I’m still doing something. Filling a need helps a lot, and it keeps me sane.”

    He continued, “I grew up in a family of radical socialists, and quite honestly, I really get bored with the theory and speechifying of various movements and philosophies from the left. It doesn’t mean I don’t support them. But as an entertainer, I know that you can lose your audience. I’ve been doing this for a long, long time, and I consider myself a morale-booster for these causes. I don’t do it if I don’t support the cause and the ideas and the people that are doing it. It’s really quite remarkable what people are doing in many movements. I like to support these movements, because they are sometimes not mainstream and no one else is supporting them, and so I feel an obligation to do it. As an activist, I like to give a voice and to support people and movements that don’t have mainstream support and visibility. And I realize that my name has a certain notoriety and that my presence can be a morale-booster.”

    Although complete information on his family was not immediately available, McDonald said in interviews that he had five children, and is known to be survived by his wife, Kathy.

  • Katie Leung ‘Would Not Want to Go Back’ to Her Time Shooting ‘Harry Potter’ Movies: ‘I Was So Easily Influenced’

    Katie Leung ‘Would Not Want to Go Back’ to Her Time Shooting ‘Harry Potter’ Movies: ‘I Was So Easily Influenced’

    Harry Potter” alum Katie Leung told Entertainment Tonight in a new interview that she wouldn’t want to return to her days of playing Cho Chang in the hit fantasy franchise.

    “I was so young at the time, and I was so easily influenced by what people would say about me because I didn’t know who I was,” said Leung, who recently portrayed Lady Araminta Gun on “Bridgerton.” “So I’ve come into ‘Bridgerton’ having a really healthy focus on the work. I’m so glad I’m here. I would not want to go back to that time. Not because I had a bad time or anything, but it’s just really nice when you know who you are, and I’m still figuring that out, but I’m a bit closer.”

    Leung, who appeared in five “Harry Potter” movies, also spoke to Variety in February about her experience filming, saying, “My first job — ‘Harry Potter’ — I had never acted before in my life, and suddenly I was in front of 20 cameras and 100 people, completely lost, still figuring out who I was. I can’t say I had the time of my life.”

    She went on to compare the experience to her time on “Arcane and “Bridgerton,” saying she felt like she “deserved” to be on those shows. “I never questioned it. And once you stop questioning it, you can actually focus on bringing your best work.”

    Leung made her screen debut as Cho in 2005 with “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire,” the fourth movie in the franchise. Originally written as a love interest for Harry Potter, Cho later appeared in “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix,” “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,” “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1,” and “Part 2.”

    The actress also shared some advice with Entertainment Tonight for whoever plays Cho in HBO’s upcoming “Harry Potter” TV adaptation.

    “For anybody really, [whatever] stage in their life, [my advice is] just to be themselves, because that’s what makes them unique,” Leung said. “And to not let the kind of noise of other people get to you, because what you have already is a gift, and you should really just try and hold onto that.”

    Leung recently spoke out about dealing with racism and backlash while filming “Harry Potter” in an interview with The Guardian.

    “I don’t know if anything could have been done back then to make things better or easier,” Leung said. “At that age, you’re curious. I remember being very curious about what people were saying about me, and I was Googling myself. Nobody could have stopped me, because I was old enough to make up my own mind.”

    “I think it just sat with me, and it affected me in ways like, ‘Oh yeah, I made that decision because people were saying this about me.’ It probably made me less outgoing,” she continued about the racism she found online about her casting. “I was very self-aware of what was coming out of my mouth. And for the longest time, I may have tried to make up for it and overcompensate.”

  • Can Collagen Really Improve Your Skin Health? What the Research Says

    Can Collagen Really Improve Your Skin Health? What the Research Says

    Bottle of collagen supplements poured into handShare on Pinterest
    Collagen supplements may support skin health, but the anti-aging benefits may be overstated. Anastasiia Krivenok/Getty Images
    • A recent review of clinical research suggests that collagen supplements may offer modest improvements in skin elasticity, hydration, and dermal density.
    • Experts say these changes tend to be subtle and gradual, typically appearing after several weeks of consistent use.
    • There is little evidence to show that collagen supplements can prevent or significantly reverse wrinkles, despite common marketing claims.
    • Skin experts say collagen supplements may support skin health, but work best alongside proven strategies such as sunscreen use, retinoids, and healthy lifestyle habits.

    Collagen supplements have become a go-to for those seeking to delay aging and improve skin appearance.

    However, a recent review of clinical research suggests that collagen supplements may offer only modest benefits for skin health, particularly in terms of elasticity and hydration.

    Across several trials, researchers found that consistent supplementation was associated with small improvements in skin elasticity, hydration, and dermal density, typically after several weeks of use.

    So, just how effective are collagen supplements when it comes to improving skin health and slowing visible signs of aging?

    Healthline spoke with experts to learn more about the purported benefits of collagen and whether common claims about supplements have any merit.

    Marlee Bruno, a board certified physician associate, aesthetic medicine educator, and founder of Mind Body & Soul Medical, said the review aligns with what she sees in the treatment room.

    “Collagen supplements may support improvements in skin elasticity and hydration over time, but they are not a magic fix for aging,” she told Healthline.

    “In my practice, patients who approach them with realistic expectations tend to be the most satisfied. When someone expects dramatic wrinkle reversal from a supplement alone, they are often disappointed,” she said.

    According to Bruno, the current science suggests collagen supplements can contribute to modest improvements in skin quality with consistent use, but the changes are typically gradual and subtle.

    If you’re taking collagen supplements consistently, Bruno said that proven benefits lie in the “three pillars of skin quality”: elasticity, hydration, and dermal density.

    “Some medical trials show that taking between 2.5 to 5 grams of bioactive collagen peptides daily can lead to an increase in skin elasticity after 8 to 12 weeks,” she said.

    Moustafa Mourad, MD, double board certified facial plastic and reconstructive head and neck surgeon and founder at Mourad NYC Facial Plastic & Reconstruction Surgery, said the most consistent benefits are improvements in skin hydration and small increases in elasticity.

    “People who respond to collagen supplements may notice that their skin looks a little more hydrated or feels slightly firmer,” he told Healthline.

    “These changes usually appear after several weeks of daily use. The key point is that these improvements are subtle and gradual. They do not produce the kind of visible lifting or tightening that people sometimes expect from cosmetic treatments,” he said.

    Bruno agreed. “What people should realistically expect is that you aren’t going to wake up with a facelift. What you can expect is subtle firmness and smoother texture,” she said.

    “Think of it like high quality insulation for a house. You don’t necessarily see it from the street, but the house stays warmer, and the structure holds up better against the elements,” she said.

    Bruno noted that collagen works better as long-term support rather than a visible transformation.

    One common claim is that collagen supplements can prevent or significantly reduce wrinkles, but experts say this claim is overstated.

    “Collagen supplements don’t prevent wrinkles in the way sunscreen prevents UV damage,” Bruno said. “Aging [involves] UV damage, genetics, inflammation, and hormonal changes,” she said.

    “Collagen helps soften the appearance of what you already have, but if you aren’t wearing SPF, no amount of collagen supplements is going to save you from wrinkles,” she explained.

    Mourad agreed that many claims about collagen and wrinkles are exaggerated.

    “Wrinkles form due to several factors, including sun exposure, natural collagen breakdown with age, repetitive facial movements, and larger structural changes in the skin,” he said.

    “Because of that, collagen supplements alone cannot prevent wrinkles or dramatically reverse them. At most, they may help support skin hydration and elasticity, making very fine lines look a little softer,” Bruno explained.

    If improving skin elasticity and delaying skin aging are among your goals, a multifactorial approach is best.

    “I always explain to patients that while supplements can support the skin from the inside out, they work best when combined with a comprehensive approach that includes medical-grade skin care, healthy lifestyle habits, and, when appropriate, in-office aesthetic treatments,” Bruno said.

    “UV exposure is responsible for about 80% of visible skin aging, breaking down collagen faster than anything else,” she said.

    Second, Bruno advised using a medical-grade retinoid to maintain high cellular turnover and antioxidants, such as vitamin C, to reduce oxidative stress.

    “Going even further, you could consider in-office collagen-stimulating treatments like microneedling that provide more measurable results than supplements alone, too,” Bruno said.

    Mourad noted that it’s important to prioritize the basics. “I always emphasize the basics of overall health, including good nutrition, adequate sleep, and avoiding smoking, since all of these influence skin quality and long-term aging,” he said.

    “Collagen supplements can certainly be added if someone wants to try them, but they should really be viewed as a complement to these proven strategies rather than a replacement for them,” he said.

  • Apple is reportedly looking into 3D printing aluminum iPhones and Apple Watches

    There could be even more 3D-printed Apple products coming in the future. According to Bloomberg‘s Mark Gurman, Apple is exploring ways to 3D print aluminum to make the manufacturing processes for iPhones and Apple Watches more efficient.

    Gurman reported that this new production process could specifically change how Apple makes its watch casings as well as iPhone enclosures. It’s not the first time Apple has tapped into 3D printing, since both the Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Series 11 were partially built with 3D-printed titanium that’s 100 percent recycled. More recently, Apple used its 3D printing process to create the titanium USB-C port for the iPhone Air, which was touted as thinner, stronger and more environmentally friendly.

    While Apple is reportedly only looking into 3D-printed aluminum right now, it could possibly result in an overall cheaper manufacturing process and lower starting prices for iPhones. Looking at Apple’s just-announced MacBook Neo, the company introduced a new manufacturing process that saves on the amount of aluminum used, helping to achieve the $599 starting price for its latest entry-level laptop. Like the colorful MacBook Neo, Gurman also reported that Apple is planning to use a “refreshed color palette” for its iMac reveal later this year.

  • South Korean Cryptocurrency Exchanges See Trading Volume Surge in 14 Altcoins – Here’s the List

    South Korean Cryptocurrency Exchanges See Trading Volume Surge in 14 Altcoins – Here’s the List

    Upbit and Bithumb, two of South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, have seen significant increases in trading volume for some cryptocurrencies over the past 24 hours.

    When the spot market data from both exchanges are evaluated together, it is evident that there is significant trading activity, particularly in major cryptocurrencies such as $XRP, Bitcoin, and Ethereum, as well as some altcoins with smaller market capitalization.

    According to the data, South Korean investors were particularly active in $XRP transactions. $XRP was among the most prominent assets, with a total trading volume exceeding $130 million across two exchanges. Bitcoin and Ethereum also ranked high on the list with high trading volumes, while lesser-known altcoins like Sign, Kite, and Plume also saw significant trading activity.

    When Upbit and Bithumb data are combined, the top cryptocurrencies and their total trading volumes over the last 24 hours are as follows:

    1. $XRP – $131 million
    2. Bitcoin (BTC) – $105 million
    3. Ethereum (ETH) – $79 million
    4. Tether (USDT) – $85 million
    5. Sign (SIGN) – $61 million
    6. Kite (KITE) – $48 million
    7. Solana (SOL) – $27 million
    8. Plume (PLUME) – $25 million
    9. Dogecoin (DOGE) – $19 million
    10. Akash Network (AKT) – $21 million
    11. Steem (STEEM) – $20 million
    12. Sentient (SENT) – $13 million
    13. ChainBounty (BOUNTY) – $12 million
    14. Adventure Gold (AGLD) – $11 million
    15. Contentos (COS) – $13 million

    *This is not investment advice.

  • NetEase is reportedly pulling funding for Yakuza creator’s studio

    The hype for Gang of Dragon, the debut game from Nagoshi Studio, may already be getting derailed. According to a Bloomberg report, Chinese tech giant NetEase is going to stop financing Nagoshi Studio starting in May. Bloomberg confirmed the news with the studio’s employees and a NetEase spokesperson.

    The report explained that NetEase decided to cut funding to Nagoshi Studio, which was founded in 2021 by Yakuza franchise creator Toshihiro Nagoshi, after finding out the studio needed $44.4 million to complete the project. Bloomberg reported that Nagoshi Studio is trying to find new sponsors but hasn’t had any success so far. The report also added that the studio can continue the project on its own, but would be responsible for paying NetEase for any associated costs to hold onto the brand or assets.

    While Nagoshi Studio may have been working on Gang of Dragon since the studio’s creation, the general public got a better look at the title through a trailer announcement during The Game Awards 2025. The action-adventure game set in Tokyo would star Ma Dong-Seok, a South Korean actor who starred in Train to Busan and Marvel’s Eternals. As of now, Nagoshi Studio might be at risk of joining other casualties stemming from NetEase’s executive decisions, like when the tech giant decided to shut down Ouka Studio in 2024.

  • Watch Out: Large Token Unlocking Events in 15 Altcoins This Week – Here’s the Day-by-Day, Hour-by-Hour List

    The cryptocurrency market witnessed Bitcoin’s surge above $74,000 last week, followed by a significant drop to around $66,000.

    The altcoin market also generally showed a negative trend. Ethereum, the largest altcoin, is poised to close the week with a 2.7% loss.

    However, a significant number of altcoins will see token unlocks this coming week. Here is the altcoin token unlock schedule we have specially prepared for you at Bitcoinsistemi.com.

    (All times are given in UTC+3 Turkish time)

    NAME (NAME)

    Market Value: $300.36 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $21.58 million (7.18% of market value)

    Date: March 9, 2026, 03:00

    Movement (MOVE)

    Market Value: $69.32 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $3.37 million (4.87% of market value)

    Date: March 9, 2026, 03:00

    $HOME ($HOME)

    Market Value: $76.21 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $2.93 million (3.85% of market value)

    Date: March 10, 2026, 03:00

    Cheelee (CHEEL)

    Market Value: $22.69 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $1.20 million (5.29% of market value)

    Date: March 10, 2026, 12:00

    Linea (LINEA)

    Market Value: $68.99 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $3.47 million (5.02% of market value)

    Date: March 10, 2026, 3:00 PM

    io.net (IO)

    Market Value: $30.16 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $1.02 million (3.43% of market value)

    Date: March 11, 2026, 03:00

    Holoworld AI (HOLO)

    Market Value: $20.55 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $2.96 million (14.39% of market value)

    Date: March 11, 2026, 03:00

    Nereus Token (NRS)

    Market Value: $5.10 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $2.39 million (46.85% of market value)

    Date: March 11, 2026, 03:00

    Moca Network (MOCA)

    Market Value: $56.29 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $3.94 million (6.98% of market value)

    Date: March 11, 2026, 5:00 PM

    Aptos (APT)

    Market Value: $723.03 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $10.46 million (1.45% of market value)

    Date: March 12, 2026, 03:00

    BounceBit (BB)

    Market Value: $25.75 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $1.14 million (4.42% of market value)

    Date: March 13, 2026, 4:00 PM

    WhiteBIT Coin (WBT)

    Market Value: $11.41 billion

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $3.50 billion (30.53% of market value)

    Date: March 13, 2026, 8:00 PM

    Boundless (ZKC)

    Market Value: $18.97 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $1.59 million (8.39% of market value)

    Date: March 15, 2026, 03:00

    WalletConnect Token (WCT)

    Market Value: $10.53 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $1.03 million (9.82% of market value)

    Date: March 15, 2026, 03:00

    StarkNet (STRK)

    Market Value: $206.91 million

    Amount of Tokens Unlocked: $4.83 million (2.34% of market value)

    Date: March 15, 2026, 3:00 PM

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Box Office: ‘Hoppers’ Redeems Pixar in Bounding to $46M U.S. Win, ‘The Bride!’ Bombs With $7.3M

    Box Office: ‘Hoppers’ Redeems Pixar in Bounding to $46M U.S. Win, ‘The Bride!’ Bombs With $7.3M

    While Pixar is surely jumping for joy over the opening of Hoppers, which easily topped the weekend box office with a domestic haul of $46 million and $88 million globally, the biggest launch for an original animated film since the fellow Animated Coco nearly a decade ago in 2017. The international portion of the total worldwide gross was $42 million from 88 markets.

    The storied animation outfit, whose core mission was to tell original stories, used to be able to do no wrong. But in recent years, Pixar has taken a drubbing for films that stalled out theatrically (not to mention the impact of the pandemic on the animation market, or the departure of legendary chief creative officer John Lasseter (he set up at David Ellison’s Skydance).

    Warner Bros. found itself in the opposite position over the weekend as Maggie Gyllenhaal’s The Bride! bombed with a withering, third-place domestic debut of $7.3 million. Overseas was just as weak; It limped to $6.3 million from 78 markets for a worldwide launch of $13 million against a net budget of $80 million before marketing. Heading into the weekend, the studio stuck with its forecast of $16 million-plus even after receiving lukewarm reviews.

    From Spyglass and Paramount, Scream 7 surprised in beating The Bride! despite falling a steep 72 percent or more to $17.1 million in its second outing. Internationally, the slasher installment took in $15.6 million for a global cume of nearly $150 million in its first 10 days.

    Hoppers is the only tile among the three to boast both strong critical and audience scores. Further, it played in Imax screens during matinee show t thad access to Imax theaters during moreover, more than half the audience were teenagers and younger adults going to see it solo, or older addls without kids. Its score on Rotten Tomatoes is 94 percent, the same as the audience score. It also received an A CinemaScore and a perfect five-out-of-five stars on PostTrak exits.

    “This is a fantastic original film from the incredible team at Pixar, and it’s wonderful to see audiences coming out with their friends and families to enjoy it together,” Disney Entertainment chair Alan Bergman said in a statement “Congratulations to our director Daniel Chong, our producer Nicole Paradis Grindle, and our talented cast, along with Pete Docter, Jim Morris, and everyone at Pixar, on a tremendous launch.

    In the comedy-adventure, animal lover Mabel (Piper Curda) seizes an opportunity to use a new technology to “hop” her consciousness into a life-like robotic beaver and communicate directly with animals. As she uncovers mysteries beyond anything she could have imagined, Mabel befriends a charismatic beaver named King George (Bobby Moynihan) and must rally the entire animal kingdom to face a major, imminent human threat: smooth-talking local mayor Jerry Generazzo (Hamm). The ensemble voice cast also features Kathy Najimy, Dave Franco, Meryl Streep, Eduardo Franco, Aparna Nancherla, Tom Law, Sam Richardson, Melissa Villaseñor, Isiah Whitlock Jr., Steve Purcell, Ego Nwodim, Nichole Sakura, Karen Huie and Vanessa Bayer.

    Hoppers earned $13.4 million on Friday, including $3 million in Thursday previews. The Bride! did only $1 million in previews

    Gyllenhaal’s follows a remarkable, year-long winning streak for studio heads Michael De Luca and Pamela Abdy, who are committed to taking bold, original swings. At the March 16 Oscar ceremony, they have two films in the best-picture race, Sinners and One Battle After Another. And lost in the coverage of The Bride! 1 was the fact that Emerald Fennel’s edgy Wuthering Heights adaptation jummped tjhe $200 million mark globally in its third weekend.

    The Bride’s audience score on Rotten Tomatoes is a mediocre 71 percent, while the critics’ score is 60 percent. Also, the $80 million film was slapped with a C+ CinemaScore.

    The R-rated, gothic romance made headlines last week for comments Gyllenhaal made on a podcast, saying she was asked by Warners movie studio chiefs Pamela Abdy and Michael De Luca to remove some of the film’s more violent scenes (she also gave a shout-out to Abdy for “understanding me”).

    Starring Jessie Buckley and Christian Bale, The Bride! draws inspiration from the 1935 film The Bride of Frankenstein and is Gyllenhaal’s second directorial outing after the award-winning indie drama The Lost Daughter, starring Olivia Colman and Buckley. All three women were nominated for a slew of awards by various orgs, including Oscars noms for best adapted screenplay (Gyllenhaal), best actress (Colman) and best supporting actress (Buckley). This year, Buckley is nominated for an Oscar for best actress for her performance in Hamnet.

    In North America, Sony Pictures Animaton’s family pic GOAT finished in fourth place with $6.6 million for a domestic total of $83.8 million in and $141.3 million globally.

    In North America, Wuthering Heights rounded out the top five with $3.8 million, while earning another $8.7 million from 79 markets at the International box office for worldwide total of $213.8 7 million.

    Jacob Elordi as Heathcliff and Margot Robbie as Catherine Earnshaw in ‘Wuthering Heights.’

    Courtesy Warner Bros. Pictures

  • Why international law is still the world’s best defence

    Why international law is still the world’s best defence

    Conceived in the long shadow of global devastation, the post–World War II order was constructed -imperfect yet purposeful – to shield humanity from a similar catastrophe.

    In 1943, as the tides of battle in World War II began to turn in favour of the Allied powers, United States President Franklin D Roosevelt warned: “Unless the peace that follows recognises that the whole world is one neighbourhood, and does justice to the whole human race, the germs of another world war will remain as a constant threat to mankind.”

    Today, that coveted peace is increasingly fragile.

    The post-war architecture conceived to avert great-power conflict, institutionalise interstate cooperation, reduce hot wars, and entrench human rights within binding international law is now under acute pressures. It faces a combustible mix of resurgent ultranationalism, hyperintensified zero-sum strategic rivalries and hegemonic power plays, the fragmentation of longstanding alliances, and the brazen repudiation of established norms.

    Multilateral institutions that once underwrote stability are increasingly marginalised or instrumentalised in the service of Machiavellian politics. Foundational treaties are hollowed out or breached outright, compliance regimes weakened, and enforcement mechanisms rendered inert—leaving the post-war international system exposed to the very coercive power politics it was designed to contain.

    The result is a palpable drift towards an unchecked “force-based order”, under which might displaces right, and power eclipses principle.

    International orders do not suddenly unravel because of political declarations broadcast at podiums, nor because of the conduct of aberrant outliers. They collapse when those collectively entrusted with their stewardship neglect to properly defend them – when resolve gives way to timidity, principle is bartered for political expedience, and moral clarity is supplanted by double standards.

    Unless the international community acts with resolve to defend and modernise the international order – fortifying rather than constraining it, including by making it more representative and meaningfully inclusive – the global system will drift toward a far more volatile and perilous disequilibrium.

    The United Nations charter – one of the central instruments of the post-war legal infrastructure – is under threat. The charter enshrines the bedrock rule of the modern international order that no state may threaten or use force except in self-defence or with UN Security Council authorisation.

    That peremptory norm – the foundation of the collective security architecture – is now visibly fraying. As raw power eclipses legal restraint, and the silence or equivocation of the many emboldens the few, the prohibition on the illegal use of force risks sliding from binding law into empty rhetoric.

    Almost overnight, the threat of force – and even unilateral military action undertaken without legal authorisation or meaningful deliberation – has begun to crystallise into a disturbing new normal. This accelerating erosion of established norms is not a passing anomaly; it is a structural shift with profound implications for international peace and security.

    Institutions of international law, which have played a decisive role in preventing conflict and advancing accountability are also threatened.

    The International Court of Justice – the UN’s highest judicial body – has successfully adjudicated numerous interstate disputes, demonstrating the power of legal mechanisms over hard power and military confrontation.

    Efforts to hold perpetrators of atrocities to account – from Nuremberg to the creation of UN ad hoc tribunals – paved the way for the International Criminal Court (ICC). Its creation in 2002 sent a powerful message that mass atrocities as merely politics by other means must no longer receive a pass, that perpetrators must be held accountable, and that impunity can no longer be tolerated. The historic cultivation of these norms may be considered a crowning achievement as this normative transformation has not only awakened humanity’s consciousness regarding atrocities, but has also reshaped expectations of accountability for such grave crimes, and recast the very narrative and language with which we confront these vital questions.

    And yet, those very powers that once shaped, and at least on the surface, nurtured these norms and institutions of international justice, now blatantly erode their integrity—whether by defiance, selective invocation, or politicisation. Thus, the edifice of collective restraint trembles, vulnerable to the machinations of those who prize unbridled power above principle.

    To be sure, such regression diminishes the security and prosperity of all participants in the international system, irrespective of their size or influence.

    Yet another grave assault on the very foundation of human rights advocacy lies in the entrenched “culture” of convenient indignation and performative empathy by states and self-serving and ideologically inclined actors alike.

    Such expedient outrage and hollow sympathy erode the credibility of the pursuit of justice, undermining the universality of dignity for which we strive.

    International law cannot be invoked à la carte, nor enforced with expedient selectivity.

    Perhaps the greatest threat to international justice is not just outright opposition from ill-wishers but indifference and arbitrary application. The contrasting global reactions to different theatres of conflict in the past decade alone lay bare the hypocrisy that undermines faith in the universality and effectiveness of international law.

    When our compassion is contingent upon political expedience, convenience or dictated by the fleeting spotlight of media attention or social media clickbait, we betray the fundamental, universal principle at the heart of human dignity.

    Just as questionable are those who conveniently brandish the language of human rights not as “the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family”, but as a tactical instrument of lawfare deployed against political adversaries. Such deceptive tactics not only trivialise the suffering of victims but can also fuel and perpetuate the very conditions that enable even graver human rights abuses. Indeed, ancient wisdom bears counsel: “beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves”. In this environment, smaller states and middle powers, in particular, cannot afford passivity. They must coordinate with strategic clarity and act with resolve to defend and reinforce a rules-based global system anchored in real and principled commitment to international law and the peaceful settlement of disputes.

    Perspective is important. The Western world, even when considered as a whole, comprises about 11 to 15 percent of the global population; the remaining 85 to 89 percent of humanity resides beyond it.

    In a century increasingly defined by multipolarity, the convergent interests of the so-called Global North and Global South in safeguarding peace and stability within – and one hopes beyond – their respective spheres of influence must rise above the complacencies and double standards that have long underwritten the status quo.

    True advocacy demands courage – to uphold and apply the law equally and impartially, even when doing so is uncomfortable, unpopular, or personally costly. It is the discipline to defend rights not only when they align with powerful interests, or “tribal” and prevailing sentiments but wherever justice demands it.

    The legitimacy and potency of international justice are also fundamentally anchored in ethical leadership and an unwavering fidelity to principle. It is incumbent upon the stewards of international institutions, courts and tribunals to embody integrity, impartiality, and steadfast dedication to their mandates. When these ethical foundations are shaken or compromised, the repercussions are deep and lasting: public confidence disintegrates, victims suffer renewed injustice, adversaries are emboldened, and the quest for justice is dealt a blow. The character and courage of those at the helm are not mere virtues, but the cornerstone upon which the entire edifice of international justice stands.

    This is our clarion call: should we permit the foundations of international law to erode—whether through selective justice, passive indifference, or the cynical calculus of unprincipled politics—the world would slip once more into the shadows of anarchy and chaos.

    We cannot yield to a world order defined by unchecked aggression, the erosion of sovereign borders under predation, and the unravelling of hard-won international norms. To acquiesce to such decline is to legitimise disorder as a governing principle, invite instability, normalise coercion, and accelerate a descent into systematic violence.

    The cost would be borne by societies worldwide, in shattered security, fractured institutions, and immeasurable human suffering.

    It is our shared responsibility to avert this regression.

    By steadfastly upholding international law, nations around the world do more than safeguard their own futures; they erect barriers against the reckless impulses of would-be aggressors, protecting all – including the aggressors themselves – from the dire consequences of unfettered conflict.

    Indifference is not an option. Wilful blindness is complicity.

    In standing in firm defence of international law, we are not only enforcing norms – we are shaping the trajectory of our civilisation and honouring the enduring promise of humanity itself.

    The rule of law is one of humanity’s quiet triumph – a beacon guiding our gradual rise from unbridled brute force towards greater order, justice, and civilisation.

    We must never allow the law to fall silent, for it stands as humanity’s foremost defender.

    The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.

  • Why are Iranian leaders sending mixed messages on Gulf attacks?

    Why are Iranian leaders sending mixed messages on Gulf attacks?

    Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has offered an apology to neighbouring countries that have been subjected to Tehran’s retaliatory strikes since the United States and Israel launched a military offensive on the country.

    But Iran’s powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) expressed its disapproval of the president’s remarks on Saturday, warning neighbouring countries that Tehran would continue attacks if US and Israel used their territory to attack Iran.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran is not going to stop attacks while Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf, speaker of Iran’s parliament, underscored Tehran’s right to self-defence.

    Iran’s leadership has been sending mixed messages about its attacks on neighbouring countries in the Gulf region. On Saturday and Sunday, more Iranian strikes were reported. On Saturday, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates said they were attacked.

    So why is Iran sending mixed messages to Gulf countries? How should its statements be interpreted?

    What have Iranian leaders said?

    In a recorded message on Saturday, Pezeshkian pledged to halt attacks against neighbouring countries unless an attack on Iran originated from their soil.

    “I personally apologise to neighbouring countries that were attacked by Iran. Our commanders, leaders and loved ones lost their lives due to the brutal aggression that took place, and our armed forces are heroes who gave their lives to defend our territorial integrity,” he said without specifying which countries he was referring to.

    “We didn’t intend to violate neighbouring countries’ [territory]. As I have said many times, they are our brothers. We stand with these ones we love in the region,” he added.

    Shortly after Pezeshkian’s apology, the IRGC weighed in and said the armed forces of Iran “once again declare that they respect the interests and national sovereignty of neighbouring countries and, up to this point, have committed no aggression against them”.

    “However, should the previous hostile actions continue, all military bases and interests of criminal America and the fake Zionist regime on land, at sea, and in the air across the region will be considered primary targets and will come under the powerful and crushing strikes of the mighty armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” an IRGC statement added.

    Pezeshkian later clarified on X that Iran had not in fact attacked any of its neighbours but rather “targeted US military bases, facilities, and installations in the region”.

    Late on Saturday, the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of Iran, Ali Larijani, echoed the IRGC’s message and said: “When the enemy attacks us from bases in the region, we respond – and we will continue to respond.”

    “This is our right and a standing policy. Regional countries must either prevent the US from using their territory against Iran, or we will have no choice but to do it ourselves,” he added.

    On Sunday morning with attacks across the Gulf continuing, Pezeshkian said his remarks on Saturday were misinterpreted by “the ⁠enemy that seeks to sow division ⁠with neighbours”.

    According to Iranian state media, the president reiterated that Iran wants good relations with “the brotherly neighbouring countries” but has been forced to respond to attacks coming from the territories of other countries.

    He stressed, however, that this response does not mean there is a dispute with those countries.

    “Iran stands strong against those who attack it and will respond with strength,” he said.

    Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs also issued a statement on Sunday emphasising “that Iran’s defensive operations against US military bases and installations in the region should by no means be construed as enmity or hostility towards the countries of the region”.

    Khalid al-Jaber, executive director of the Middle East Council on Global Affairs in Doha, says different Iranian officials have sent several “contradictory” messages to countries in the region.

    “We don’t know which one is true. We don’t think now, in war, that Iran is going to stop attacking some infrastructure in the Gulf,” al-Jaber told Al Jazeera, citing the attack on the water desalination plant in Bahrain a proof of that.

    “Since the attack on Ayatollah Khamenei, it seems like there is no institute or a person or leadership we can talk to, or we can make a deal with, to try to understand what their perspective is, what their point of view is,” he said.

    How should Iran’s messages be interpreted?

    According to Al Jazeera’s Resul Serdar, Pezeshkian’s apology was overtaken by the Revolutionary Guard’s dominance.

    “Political figures in Iran are responsible for running state affairs and nonstrategic affairs. But when it comes to strategic affairs, such as the country’s foreign and security policies, politicians don’t have a say, including the president, who, according to the constitution, is the number two in charge. This is a very well-known fact in Iran,” Serdar said.

    The centre of power lies with the office of the supreme leader and with the IRGC, even during peacetime, he added.

    On Sunday, Serdar said Iranians were interpreting Pezeshkian’s statement that his remarks had been misconstrued as one not meant for Gulf countries but instead for Azerbaijan and Turkiye.

    “Azerbaijan because of the ethnic tensions. There are tens of thousands of Azeri [people] living in Iran, so an attack on them could backfire, and for Turkiye, it is a NATO member,” he said.

    Azerbaijan has sought Iran’s apology after a drone attack targeted its autonomous Nakhchivan exclave on Thursday. Tehran, however, has insisted that it was not behind the attack.

    On Wednesday, Turkiye’s Ministry of National Defence said a ⁠ballistic missile fired from ⁠Iran towards Turkish airspace had been intercepted and destroyed by NATO. But Iran’s ⁠armed forces have also denied firing ⁠any missile towards Turkish territory.

    Ali Vaez, director of the Iran project at the International Crisis Group, told Al Jazeera that Pezeshkian’s occasional off-key remarks have underscored his limited political instincts and experience in navigating high-stakes moments.

    “But in wartime, rhetorical missteps by civilian officials are ultimately beside the point: The only voice that truly matters is the IRGC’s,” he added.

    How has the Gulf reacted?

    After an apology and threats from Iranian officials, strikes on countries across the Gulf have continued.

    On Sunday, an Iranian drone attack caused material damage to a water desalination plant in Bahrain, its Ministry of Interior said.

    That came a day after Araghchi said the US attacked a desalination plant on Qeshm Island off southern Iran, setting a “precedent”. There has been no immediate comment from Iran since Bahrain’s statement. A majority of Gulf countries depend largely on desalinated water for their inhabitants’ consumption.

    Also on Saturday, Qatar, Kuwait and the UAE reported incoming missiles and drones in their territories. On Sunday, Kuwait said two Ministry of Interior personnel were killed while on duty and attacks on its international airport and social security office caused fires.

    Saudi Arabia said Sunday that an attack on Riyadh’s diplomatic quarter was foiled and several drones were downed in its airspace.

    On Sunday, the Gulf Cooperation Council said Iran’s continued attacks against Bahrain and Kuwait are “dangerous acts of aggression” that threaten regional security and stability. The bloc comprises Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

    So far, countries in the Gulf have intercepted and destroyed most of the Iranian missiles and drones but have not yet launched strikes against Tehran.

    Vaez told Al Jazeera that the Gulf states can certainly retaliate but that is likely to lead to even more aggressive Iranian retaliation.

    “Siding with Israel to bomb another Muslim state would also entail political consequences for the Gulf states,” he added.

    How has the US reacted?

    After the Iranian president’s apology on Saturday, US President Donald Trump said in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, that Iran has surrendered to its neighbours.

    “Iran is no longer the ‘Bully of the Middle East,’ they are, instead, ‘THE LOSER OF THE MIDDLE EAST,’ and will be for many decades until they surrender or, more likely, completely collapse!” Trump posted.

    “Siding with Israel to bomb another muslim state would also entail political consequences for the Gulf states,” he added.

    In an interview with Al Jazeera on Saturday, Hamidreza Gholamzadeh, director of the Iranian think tank Diplo House, said Trump’s interpretation of Pezeshkian’s comments as a “surrender” is “totally false”.

    Gholamzadeh said Iran is asking its neighbours “that they stop cooperating with the United States or the Israeli regime and do not allow them to use their land or their airspace to attack Iran”, describing the request as something “very normal” and “legal”.