Author: rb809rb

  • ‘Company’ Stars Nick Nolte, Adelaide Clemens on the Film’s Power of Stillness

    ‘Company’ Stars Nick Nolte, Adelaide Clemens on the Film’s Power of Stillness

    The vital act of storytelling drives Casey Affleck’s “Company.” Knowing those stories and the people in them also passes on lessons learned involving grief, regret and forgiveness. The film premieres in competition at Venice.

    “Company” stars Nick Nolte, Adelaide Clemens, Ben Mendelsohn, Scoot McNairy, Emily Alyn Lind, Caylee Cowan and Atticus Affleck. The film jumps between 1975, 1953 and 1903, connected by stories in each era. Much of the film involves just two actors in a shot, or one actor in a beautifully composed shot.
    “When Casey sets up the camera, you know by the angles that he’s shooting from that it’s going to be much more intimate,” says Nolte.

    Nolte’s Tom is an old man living alone. It’s winter, and he sees a young woman passed out on the snow outside his isolated cabin. He brings Alice (Cowan) in, warms her up and she tells him a story about a couple living in a cabin quite like his in 1903.

    “It was the script, and it was so delicate,” Nolte says of what drew him to the project. “It had these silences and gaps, and the storytelling was obvious. I just found that intriguing. It wasn’t like any script that normally comes in. You know, it was one of those special ones.”

    Nolte didn’t want to play Tom as necessarily a hermit, though, as we do discover his story as the film unspools. “I looked at him as somebody that wanted to not be with humanity in general. He was a reclusive, and he lived in isolation, and he’d probably be a trapper.”

    Affleck’s direction is quite intentional, with each scene meticulously framed and lit, allowing stillness to permeate. Nolte’s expressive eyes and face do a lot of the work in each scene as Alice talks. “It was really about listening, just really listening to the story,” he says.

    In the 1903 segment, Clemens and McNairy play a couple on an isolated farm, who, like Tom, find and rescue a young person from the snow. Caleb (Atticus Affleck) intrigues Rebecca (Clemens), as he brags about his world travels and personal philosophy with a familiar mix of confidence and insecurity — she’s wary, and his presence creates delicious tension.

    “As I’ve gotten older, and I’ve worked more in the industry, I’ve started to learn the power of a two shot, and I’ve also started to learn that you need really skilled professionals to execute that in a powerful way,” she says. “You need an incredible cinematographer who we have on this film, Marcell Rév — everything was so beautiful.”

    Clemens says that working with Casey is “what you dream of” because he is an Oscar-winning actor himself.

    “Directors will often do a two shot, but then they’ll cover it as well. But if you have two actors who are in an environment where they’re supported, then you can have a really powerful scene, and you can see our whole bodies,” Clemens says of the framing, noting that she and her colleagues had to use their whole bodies. “We tell this whole story from the shins up. It wouldn’t be executed in the way it was if we didn’t have Casey trusting us.”

    Clemens brought a “Buddha-like” demeanor and maternal depth and empathy to Rebecca, whereas Atticus Affleck had to leave everyone wondering about his truth. Clemens says that while he was well-prepared for the film, and “rehearsed intensely,” his performance was natural and “didn’t feel like a performance … He was amazing.”

    Have some people in Hollywood figured out how to continue to spotlight Hollywood’s greats? “I’m 86, and real limited in the kind of roles I can play now, but I find that without the work, there just isn’t any reason to keep on going,” says Nolte, who has more projects on deck. “You know your creativity is tied into it, and as long as I’m physically capable, I encourage them to consider me. I haven’t thought about retiring.”

  • PUMP’s latest gains, buyback plan could help token target THIS resistance level!

    PUMP’s latest gains, buyback plan could help token target THIS resistance level!

    Pump.fun has allocated 54% of its protocol revenues to its continuous $PUMP buyback and burn plan. This plan has helped it remove about $3.55 million worth of $PUMP tokens from the open market, making it a deflationary factor for the asset.

    Drawing lessons from past experiences where there was a similar situation, the reduction in the supply had an impact on the price performance. The same turn of events could be in store for $PUMP, especially with the increase in its demand recently.

    Given that the $PUMP token has now become more actively traded, there are efforts in the market to see if the buyback process can help boost its price action. However, despite the ongoing burns, $PUMP remains about 50% below its all-time high. This, despite the price gaining by 10% in the last 24 hours on the back of the trading volume doubling and alluding to greater market participation.

    That gap is evidence that the deflationary mechanism is yet to fully overcome the selling pressure that pushed the token away from its peak.

    Source: Tokenomist

    Volume gives the recovery more weight

    $PUMP’s latest price move has been backed by a sharp increase in market activity. The altcoin gained by 10% over 24 hours, while its trading volume almost doubled to $412.78 million during the same period. Of the total number of open trades in the market, long positions accounted for 58% of the total exposure, showcasing the magnitude of the bullish bias.

    In most cases, the combination of rising prices and expanding volume usually provide a stronger foundation for a recovery since the move reflects greater participation rather than a thin liquidity spike.

    The same could come into play in $PUMP’s case.

    Source: Santiment

    Can $PUMP finally break $0.0055?

    The $0.0055-level has rejected $PUMP twice, making it the most important barrier in the recovery process. Pump.fun’s buyers now need to absorb the selling pressure around this zone to confirm that the recent rally is more than a short-term bounce.

    A decisive break above $0.0055, particularly if accompanied by another expansion in volume, could strengthen the bullish structure and open the door to higher levels. It would also mark an important shift after two failed attempts to clear the resistance. Given the fact that $PUMP is still trading above all key EMAs, a rally continuation is more likely to occur.

    Failure to break the level would tell a different story though. $PUMP could retreat towards its EMA support as short-term buyers take profits and the market waits for another spark.

    Source: TradingView

    Final Summary

    • $PUMP’s price jumped by 10% as trading volume doubled and the token held above its key EMAs.
    • Pump.fun has committed 54% of protocol revenue to buybacks, with $3.55M worth of $PUMP already removed from circulation.
  • Jack Dorsey’s Block seeks OCC approval to establish national trust bank for Bitcoin, stablecoin custody

    Jack Dorsey’s Block seeks OCC approval to establish national trust bank for Bitcoin, stablecoin custody

    Block, the financial technology company founded by Jack Dorsey and Jim McKelvey, is seeking regulatory approval to establish Builders Bank & Trust, N.A., a national trust bank that would provide federally supervised custody and fiduciary services, including for Bitcoin and stablecoins, the company said Tuesday.

    Builders Bank would be led by Lee Woolley, Block’s digital asset strategy lead, who has more than two decades of banking and financial services experience. The OCC must approve the application before the bank can begin operations.

    “Building on Block’s experience in the digital asset space, our history with Square Financial Services, and the deep banking expertise of the team we’ve assembled, we believe Builders Bank is well positioned to support Block’s broader vision of economic empowerment,” Woolley said.

    The proposed bank would be uninsured and non-deposit-taking. Block said the national charter would provide a consistent federal framework as its custody business scales and would support the activities the company already offers.

  • The case for the US going back to the firing squad

    The case for the US going back to the firing squad

    The US has evolved its method of criminal executions, but drug shortages and protests over medical ethics have made lethal injections increasingly difficult to carry out. John Malcolm of the Meese Institute tells Al Jazeera that the US should ‘go back to a firing squad’.

  • Former ‘60 Minutes’ Managing Editor Guy Campanile Claims Show Has Become A “Casualty Of Corporate Priorities And Ideological Intrusion”

    Former ‘60 Minutes’ Managing Editor Guy Campanile Claims Show Has Become A “Casualty Of Corporate Priorities And Ideological Intrusion”

    As a revamped 60 Minutes prepares for its season premiere on Sunday, the show’s former managing editor is claiming that he and others were fired after they raised objections to corporate and ideological interference.

    Guy Campanile, in a post on Facebook first obtained by The Guardian, cited the correspondents and other top staffers who were terminated in May, part of a shakeup on the show. He wrote, “After some time and deep reflection, I am now comfortable and prepared to talk about it. Tanya Simon, Draggan Mihailovich, Matthew Polevoy, Scott Pelley, Sharyn Alfonsi, Cecilia Vega and I refused to be accomplices in the destruction of the most prestigious news program on American television.”

    He added, “We would not compromise our principles or reputations by jamming unverifiable notions or White House talking points into our reporting. We objected when told to conduct interviews arranged by the administration.”

    Campanile was at the network for 34 years, including stints as executive producer of CBS Evening News and CBS News specials.

    He did not write about specific examples. He added, “To be clear – we were told to leave because we insisted on doing our jobs. What has happened recently at 60 Minutes – where I believe editorial independence has become a casualty of corporate priorities and ideological intrusion – was tragic. But it was part of an inevitable progression in the cascade of afflictions that have devalued our most trusted sources of news.”

    The network declined to comment. But in the face of criticisms from Pelley, Vega and Alfonsi, who cited individual incidents, the network has pushed back on claims of interference, characterizing them as part of the editorial process. In June, editor in chief Bari Weiss told The Wall Street Journal, “What’s being called ‘editorial interference’ is in reality the job description of an editor in chief.”

    Earlier on Tuesday, the show unveiled a trailer for the season premiere, featuring Norah O’Donnell’s interview with the officer who was rescued in Iran after his plane was struck down. Nick Bilton, the new executive producer, told The New York Times that other changes will be part of the program, including a one-minute end segment. He also told the Times that Donald Trump is “one thousand percent” fair game, along with “everyone else in Washington, regardless of which side you’re on.”

    In his post, Campanile also criticized journalism in general, writing that it has become “largely an exercise in presentation rather than examination.” He wrote, “Making matters worse is the cadre of self-described influencers and on-line opinionists who market themselves as ‘journalists.’ Some have been given control of our most precious reporting institutions, including CBS News. Many of these newsroom managers have never been exposed to the depths of poverty, the ravages of war or the heartbreak of disaster. Yet these dilettantes and their enablers make critical programming decisions based on what might trend on-line over the next few hours.” Bari Weiss, the editor in chief of CBS News, is a former opinion writer for The New York Times and founder of the center-right site The Free Press.

  • Paramount Argues That the States Post a $1.88 Billion Bond to Cover Warner Bros. Bills

    Paramount Argues That the States Post a $1.88 Billion Bond to Cover Warner Bros. Bills

    Paramount is continuing to press a dozen states led by California and the Writers Guild of America to bear the costs of the hold up caused by their lawsuits challenging the $111 billion megamerger.

    The studio has asked for a $1.88 billion bond to cover losses if it wins the cases. In July, U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín temporarily halted the deal and scheduled a trial for March, months past its target closing date of late September.

    There will be major financial repercussions for the delay. Under the agreement, Warners shareholders are owed roughly $650 million per quarter or $6.9 million per day if the merger hasn’t closed by Oct. 1. The bond represents the maximum payout to investors, plus legal fees.

    The states and WGA have pushed back on the demand, arguing that Paramount proposed the fee in a bid to win support from shareholders, who were weighing a rival bid from Netflix at the time. The studio “now wishes to offload that responsibility,” stated a filing from California Attorney General Rob Bonta last month.

    In a brief filed on Tuesday, Paramount says that the states are obligated to post the bond under antitrust laws and federal procedures governing injunctions. It claims the delay is a “serious injury at a time when studios are already being squeezed out by streaming megaliths like Netflix and Amazon and other big tech companies who have entered the competition.”

    Across the litigation, Paramount has emphasized hefty losses associated with the court holding up the merger, pointing to missed opportunities to ramp-up investment in production and rising financing costs.

    “Paramount simply asks that Plaintiffs honor what the Clayton Act requires: A bond that will compensate Paramount for the damage it will suffer if the injunction proves improvidently granted, i.e., if Paramount ultimately prevails in the litigation and was therefore wrongly prevented from consummating the merger now, as it is prepared to do,” writes Danielle Sassoon, a lawyer for the studio, in the filing.

    A legal sticking point in the back-and-forth over the bond: The states have argued that the court never issued an injunction, which would render Paramount ineligible for a bond, since the studio voluntarily agreed not to close the deal under a joint stipulation. Paramount pushes back on the framing, calling the argument disingenuous.

    Historically, courts have side-eyed issuing massive bonds in merger cases, particularly when the government challenges the deal. The judge overseeing the Nexstar-Tegna merger, for example, issued one for $10,000 after the TV giant asked for $150 million.

    Regulators across 69 countries have cleared the merger. The lawsuits from the states and WGA are the only barriers keeping the company from closing.

    “But for these lawsuits, the transaction is now otherwise ready to close, and the resulting costs of delay are substantial and quantifiable,” said a Paramount spokesperson.

    “If plaintiffs insist that this transaction is paused during the pendency of their lawsuit, they must accept the financial consequences if their challenge ultimately fails,” the spokesperson added. “Paramount agreed to delay closing to facilitate a prompt resolution of the case, while expressly preserving its legal rights and we continue to honor that agreement.”

  • Why Biden administration renamed 650 geographic features

    Why Biden administration renamed 650 geographic features

    Claim:

    U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration renamed roughly 650 geographic features.

    Rating:

    True

    Context

    The claim emerged in response to criticism of U.S. President Donald Trump’s executive orders changing the names of the geographic features known as the Gulf of Mexico, Denali and Lake Ontario. It’s based on a false equivalence, however. In 2021, Biden’s Interior Secretary Deb Haaland signed an order renaming the roughly 650 geographic features because their existing names contained a racial slur demeaning Native American women.

    U.S. President Donald Trump has, as of this writing, issued two executive orders during his second term mandating that the Interior Department, in coordination with the country’s Board on Geographic Names, rename these familiar landmarks:

    1. the Gulf of Mexico, to the Gulf of America
    2. Denali, to Mount McKinley, restoring the government’s official name for the tallest mountain in North America from 1917 to 2015
    3. Lake Ontario, to Lake America

    Trump’s orders were criticized around the world, including by many Americans.

    But according to posts on social media, former U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration engaged in its own renaming spree, changing the official names of approximately 650 different geographic features. This, the posts said, is evidence that the public holds a double standard against Trump.

    Snopes readers searched the site looking to see whether the government had actually renamed 650 different locations during Joe Biden’s presidency. We found the claim was true, though comparing the two actions was a reach.

    The Biden-era efforts, led by then-Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, had one goal: renaming locations throughout the U.S. whose names included a racial slur demeaning Native American women. Trump’s executive orders, by contrast, targeted some of the country’s most prominent landmarks, including two bodies of water only partially controlled by the U.S.

    “Derogatory names have previously been identified by the Secretary of the Interior or the Board on Geographic Names and have been comprehensively replaced,” read the Interior Department’s November 2021 news release announcing the order. As precedent, it cited a 1962 order eliminating the use of the N-word and a 1974 order eliminating the use of a slur for Japanese people.

    In September 2022, the Interior Department published a news release announcing that the Board on Geographic Names had approved new names for each of the affected locations, alongside a list of all the changes and a map of the renamed locations. There were indeed approximately 650 new names.

    It’s worth noting, though, that beyond the renamed Olympic Valley, California, which hosted the 1960 Winter Olympic Games, none of the locations that underwent a name change under Biden could be considered nationally prominent in the same way as Lake Ontario, the Gulf of Mexico or Denali. 

    For further reading, we’ve also covered a rumor suggesting that Trump signed an executive order renaming the state of New Mexico to “New America.”

    Sources

    “Gov. Pritzker Pokes at Trump, Says Lake Michigan Is Now ‘Lake Illinois.’” ABC7 Chicago, 9 Feb. 2025, https://abc7chicago.com/post/governor-jb-pritzker-pokes-president-donald-trump-says-lake-michigan-is-now-illinois-state-will-anex-green-bay/15885139/.

    House, The White. “Restoring Names That Honor American Greatness.” The White House, 21 Jan. 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/restoring-names-that-honor-american-greatness/.

    Interior Department Completes Removal of “Sq___” from Federal Use | U.S. Department of the Interior. Press Release. 8 Sept. 2022, https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/interior-department-completes-removal-sq-federal-use.

    Lakritz, Talia. “All the Place Trump Has Renamed in His Second Presidency, from Bodies of Water to Military Buildings.” Business Insider, https://www.businessinsider.com/places-trump-renamed-gulf-of-mexico-lake-ontario-2026-8. Accessed 8 Sept. 2026.

    “Mexico’s President Amused by Trump’s Order to Rename the Gulf of Mexico.” AP News, 21 Jan. 2025, https://apnews.com/article/mexico-us-trump-gulf-name-046f765d52fc9d05d83bbca4b2017539.

    “Ontario Premier Answers Trump’s ‘Lake America’ with Giant ‘Lake Ontario’ Sign.” ABC7 New York, 30 Aug. 2026, https://abc7ny.com/story/ontario-premier-doug-ford-answers-donald-trumps-lake-america-giant-sign/19763474/.

    Orders, Executive. “Honoring the American History of the Great Lakes and Renaming Lake Ontario as Lake America.” The White House, 27 Aug. 2026, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/08/honoring-the-american-history-of-the-great-lakes-and-renaming-lake-ontario-as-lake-america-3a36/.

    Stone, Eric. “Alaska Legislature Formally Opposes Trump’s Renaming of Denali as Mount McKinley.” Alaska Public Media, 8 Feb. 2025, https://alaskapublic.org/news/politics/alaska-legislature/2025-02-07/alaska-legislature-formally-opposes-trumps-renaming-of-denali-as-mt-mckinley.

  • Surprise and Shine: All the News From Apple’s Sept. 9 Event. iPhone 18 Pro, Foldable Ultra, Apple Watches, More

    After months of rumors, Apple is finally ready to show off its next-generation devices at a Sept. 9 event that will also mark the formal debut of John Ternus as CEO.

    New iPhones are a given, but Apple is reportedly shaking things up this year. We won’t see a standard iPhone 18 until next year; this week’s event is all about the Pro versions, making room for a new Apple form factor: the foldable phone. But don’t forget about the new Apple Watches, AirPods, and maybe a smart home refresh?

    PCMag’s Eric Zeman, Florence Ion, and Andrew Gebhart will be on the ground in Cupertino on Wednesday to bring you all the news. Follow along in our live blog below and the livestream embedded above, starting at 10 a.m. PT / 1 p.m. PT. Before the show starts, tune in for live coverage from PCMag’s Executive Producer, Iyaz Akhtar, and CNET Editor at Large, Bridget Carey, starting at 9:30 a.m. PT / 12:30 p.m. ET.

    Apple’s Sept. 9 ‘Surprise and Shine’ Event: What to Expect

    Apple’s got another yearly iPhone event up its sleeves, and we’re expecting the new 18 series, the company’s first-ever foldable, the Watch Series 12, and more.

    “,”update_date”:”2026-09-08T21:39:00.000000Z”,”updated_at”:”2026-09-08T21:41:33.000000Z”},{“uuid”:”04e0PCMjkhaxRApJvUY8yF0″,”title”:”Our Review of the First iPhone in 2007 Was Pitch-Perfect”,”image”:{“urls”:{“400w”:”https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/blog-updates/04e0PCMjkhaxRApJvUY8yF0.fit_lim.size_400x250.v1788901792.webp”,”800w”:”https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/blog-updates/04e0PCMjkhaxRApJvUY8yF0.fit_lim.size_768x432.v1788901792.webp”,”1600w”:”https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/blog-updates/04e0PCMjkhaxRApJvUY8yF0.fit_lim.size_1600x900.v1788901792.webp”},”width”:1920,”height”:1080,”metadata”:{“altText”:”first iphone”}},”body”:”

    Our Review of the First iPhone in 2007 Was Pitch-Perfect

    As part of our Apple a Day series, we looked back at PCMag’s review of the first iPhone, and it’s amazing to see how prescient it was. On the eve of a new iPhone line, we consider just how much Apple’s handheld device has influenced the mobile technology landscape.

    “,”update_date”:”2026-09-08T21:38:00.000000Z”,”updated_at”:”2026-09-08T21:38:58.000000Z”},{“uuid”:”02LL2BCw7MOMuPVdMwmMkZE”,”title”:”What I Got Dead Wrong About the Original Apple Watch”,”image”:{“urls”:{“400w”:”https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/blog-updates/02LL2BCw7MOMuPVdMwmMkZE.fit_lim.size_400x250.v1788901539.webp”,”800w”:”https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/blog-updates/02LL2BCw7MOMuPVdMwmMkZE.fit_lim.size_768x432.v1788901539.webp”,”1600w”:”https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/blog-updates/02LL2BCw7MOMuPVdMwmMkZE.fit_lim.size_1600x900.v1788901539.webp”},”width”:1920,”height”:1080,”metadata”:{“altText”:”apple watch 1″}},”body”:”

    What I Got Dead Wrong About the Original Apple Watch

    Ahead of this week’s event, we kicked off a series called An Apple a Day, where we’ll share pieces of Apple content from our archives. Before Apple unveils the Apple Watch Series 11 and a revamped Ultra, PCMag’s Alex Colon looks back on his review of the original smartwatch in 2015. He was right about the launch—and completely off about the long game.

    “,”update_date”:”2026-09-08T21:35:00.000000Z”,”updated_at”:”2026-09-08T21:39:13.000000Z”}])”>

    About Our Expert

  • The First Episode of ‘Star Trek’ Was Not the Best Episode of ‘Star Trek’

    The First Episode of ‘Star Trek’ Was Not the Best Episode of ‘Star Trek’

    The TV viewing options for science fiction fans in the fall of 1966 were limited, but not nonexistent. Lost in Space was starting its second season on CBS, and Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea was heading into its third on ABC. The producer of both of those, Irwin Allen, also had The Time Tunnel debuting on ABC.

    None of those shows would last beyond 1968. Nor did any of them give rise to an enduring, beloved TV and movie franchise like the other new sci-fi series that fall, Star Trek. Gene Roddenberry’s series debuted 60 years ago, airing from 8:30-9:30 p.m. ET/PT Sept. 8, 1966, on NBC.

    With that in mind, I decided to watch the first episode ever aired (the original series streams on Paramount+). It’s … fine, but it only hints at some of the reasons why it would become one of the most enduring franchises in American pop culture history.

    The episode that aired on Sept. 8, 1966, was called “The Man Trap.” It was the sixth episode of Star Trek to be filmed, meaning that NBC decided to air episodes out of their production order (a pattern that would repeat itself many times in the future, on shows ranging from Homicide: Life on the Street to Freaks and Geeks to Firefly). Star Trek wasn’t heavily serialized — few shows were back then — but airing this episode first has the effect of dropping viewers into the show with little beyond William Shatner‘s opening credits narration to set the scene.

    (The show’s first pilot, “The Cage,” never aired in its original form during the series, but a lot of it was repurposed for a later episode, “The Menagerie.” The second pilot, “Where No Man Has Gone Before,” aired two weeks after “The Man Trap.”)

    The plot (60-year-old spoilers, I guess) involves a shape-shifting alien who has assumed the form of an archaeologist’s wife on an otherwise desolate planet. The Enterprise crew is sent there to perform an annual health checkup on the couple, but the archaeologist, Professor Crater, is weirdly resistant to letting Dr. McCoy (DeForest Kelley) examine her. At first it seems that’s because the (human) wife and McCoy had had a relationship years earlier, but right off the bat the audience knows something is up: The woman’s appearance is different to each member of the crew, with some clever editing helping to sell the illusion.

    The alien needs salt to survive, and the couple’s supply is running low, so the alien drains all of it from a poor Enterprise crew member’s body, and then a couple more who are beamed down later. It assumes the form of one of the dead crewmen and beams aboard, taking on several other people’s forms before it’s finally found out and McCoy reluctantly sets his phaser to kill, still clinging to the notion that the alien is his former love.

    It’s a pretty simple story, and though several largely anonymous crew members (none of whom, contra the show’s eventual trope, wears a red shirt) perish, the stakes are low compared to what would come in later episodes and seasons. There’s no B- or C-story to speak of.

    What “The Man Trap” does offer is an introduction to most of the characters who would become key parts of Star Trek in the years to come. James Doohan’s Scotty is absent, but Kirk (Shatner), Spock (Leonard Nimoy), McCoy, Uhura (Nichelle Nichols) and Sulu (George Takei) all have several key scenes, along with Grace Lee Whitney as Yeoman Janice Rand (who was written out partway through the first season). Walter Koenig’s Chekhov would join in the second season. Nichols is saddled with what’s closest to an exposition dump as Uhura tries to make small talk with Spock, only to hit a Vulcan wall, and then is shocked when he doesn’t react to the first crewman’s death (“My demonstration of concern will not change what has happened,” he replies).

    The planet where Crater and the alien reside is very obviously a soundstage — something that’s probably more noticeable watching on a big high-definition set now than it was on a tube TV then — but episode takes viewers to a number of locations onboard the Enterprise, not just the bridge and transporter room. There’s even a tracking shot as Kirk walks down a corridor and into an elevator; it’s not a consequential scene, but it jumped out at me considering how static the camera is in the rest of the show (and in most other series of that era).

    The Hollywood Reporter’s perfunctory (and somewhat condescending) review of the Star Trek premiere notes that the show features “quite a bit of suspense and tricks with gadgets that will please the sci-fi buffs no end” and concludes that it “should be a winner.” Ratings-wise, that didn’t turn out to be the case: Star Trek was what we’d now call a bubble show for all three of its seasons, and NBC canceled it in 1969. That was nowhere near the end of the story, obviously.

    “The Man Trap” was a sturdy enough first episode, but it didn’t really hint at the creative leaps Star Trek would take in the course of its original run — ranging from “The Trouble with Tribbles” to “The City on the Edge of Forever.” Nor did anyone know at the time how deep a connection Trek fans would forge with the series. That as much as anything helped keep Star Trek alive through the 1970s. Star Trek: The Motion Picture‘s release in 1979 charted a new course for the franchise, which has continued through more than 20 series and films. Roddenberry’s optimistic vision of the future hasn’t necessarily played out in our present, but the appeal of that idea is still awfully strong six decades later.

  • Congress Begins Drafting 20% Federal Film Incentive With Trump’s Blessing (EXCLUSIVE)

    Congress Begins Drafting 20% Federal Film Incentive With Trump’s Blessing (EXCLUSIVE)

    Members of Congress are drafting legislation that would create a 20% federal film and TV incentive — with bonuses that could bring it as high as 30% — after President Trump endorsed the idea last week.

    The bill is expected to be introduced this month, and perhaps as soon as the end of next week, according to sources familiar with the process. Rep. Nathaniel Moran, a Republican from East Texas, is working on the bill with Rep. Linda Sanchez, a Democrat from Whittier, Calif. Both serve on the House Ways and Means Committee, which is responsible for tax legislation.

    Rep. Laura Friedman, a Democrat from Burbank, Calif., has also been working with Rep. Brian Jack, a Republican from the Atlanta suburbs, on the bipartisan effort.

    For the last year, the Motion Picture Association and entertainment unions have been advocating for an incentive that would compete with generous subsidies from the U.K., Canada, Australia and scores of other countries. Trump threw his weight behind the idea in a Truth Social post on Aug. 31, a development expected to unlock Republican support on Capitol Hill.

    The draft legislation broadly aligns with the MPA’s request. The bill would offer a base credit of 20% of all labor costs, both below-the-line and above-the-line. A wide range of productions would be eligible, including reality TV and animation in addition to films and scripted TV shows, according to sources familiar with the legislation. It would not include news or sports broadcasts.

    The bill would also include four “uplifts” meant to attract political support. According to a source, the bill would allow producers to claim an additional five percent if they meet one of these four criteria:

    • film in a rural opportunity zone
    • make an independent production
    • bring a certain amount of filming back to the U.S. from abroad
    • spend at least $10 million in 10 different states in a year

    Producers could claim up to two of those uplifts, for a maximum of 30%. The federal tax credit would stack on top of state incentives, meaning that productions could see a total subsidy of 60% or more depending on where they film.

    Supporters have argued that the incentive will not just help Los Angeles and New York — where the bulk of production takes place — but will also boost rural areas that currently have little filming and little or no state tax incentive.

    The hope is that spreading production around will broaden support, much the way the state incentives in California and New York attracted votes from rural lawmakers by offering a bonus for filming outside of Los Angeles and New York City, respectively.

    California lawmakers have also pushed for a bonus for any production in an area that was recently declared a federal disaster zone. (All of Los Angeles County would qualify due to the 2025 fires.) That is not included in the latest draft.

    The tax credit could be used to offset federal income tax, or be sold to another taxpayer to offset their tax liability. It would not be refundable.

    The bill has yet to go to the Joint Committee on Taxation, which will get a score on how much it would cost — though it is safe to say it will run into the billions of dollars. In his post last week, Trump argued that the cost would be “made up tenfold by the money pouring into the Treasury’s coffers.”

    The MPA is expected to issue a report in the coming weeks that would expound on that claim, arguing that production creates a ripple effect that benefits the local economy.

    Some supporters of the measure are optimistic about getting it through Congress as part of a tax bill during the lame duck session after the November election, though it may be more likely to happen next year.

    “I would be very happy for it to happen in the lame duck,” Friedman said in an interview last week. “I can’t promise that’s possible. We’re going to try not only to get this done quickly, but to have all our ducks in a row.”

    Friedman said that the discussions took on a new momentum after Trump got involved.

    “I can’t tell you the number of texts that have come in from people who have offered to help,” she said.

    She declined to discuss the specifics of the legislation, but said she is working to build a coalition across the country behind the idea.

    “Everyone in every state loves movies and television,” she said. “Everyone benefits by this product being made here.”