Author: rb809rb

  • Taking Xanax XR? FDA Recalls Batch Over Effectiveness Concerns

    Xanax in packagingShare on Pinterest
    The FDA issued a nationwide recall of Xanax XR for failing to meet dissolution specifications. BSIP/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
    • The FDA has issued a report regarding the voluntary recall of a single lot of Xanax XR.
    • Viatris has recalled 3-milligram tablets in 60-tablet bottles with the lot number 8177156.
    • The company reports that this lot failed to meet dissolution specifications.
    • Experts say this could cause the pills to not be as effective in controlling symptoms.
    • They advise that you continue taking the pills until your doctor can issue a new prescription.

    A nationwide recall of Xanax has many people wondering whether their anti-anxiety medication has been affected.

    According to an Enforcement Report issued by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Viatris, Inc., a major pharmaceutical company, has voluntarily recalled a specific lot of Xanax XR (alprazolam extended-release tablets) distributed across the United States.

    The recall, initiated on March 17, affects 3-milligram tablets packaged in 60-tablet bottles, produced in Ireland and distributed by Viatris Specialty LLC in Morgantown, W.Va.

    The decision comes after the product failed to meet dissolution specifications, which are critical for ensuring proper drug release and effectiveness.

    Patients and healthcare providers are urged to check their medication and contact Viatris or their healthcare professional if they have the affected lot, numbered 8177156, with an expiration date of February 28, 2027.

    Dissolution testing measures how quickly and efficiently the active ingredient is released from the tablet into the body.

    As noted in the Enforcement Report, the formulation of the drug being recalled is Xanax XR, a medication commonly prescribed for the treatment of anxiety and panic disorders.

    This extended-release formulation is designed to release the medication gradually over time, providing more consistent symptom control.

    Aleksey Aronov, AGPCNP-BC, a board certified adult geriatric primary care nurse practitioner and the founder and CEO of VIPs IV, told Healthline that if the pill does not meet dissolution specifications, it may not break down as it should in the body, which could result in the medicine not working properly.

    “When a pill does not dissolve the right way, the body may not absorb the correct amount of the medicine, which may result in not treating anxiety or panic symptoms appropriately,” he said. “Pills that fail to dissolve essentially may not be effective.”

    The Enforcement Report further notes that the recall is classified by the FDA as a Class II recall. Class II indicates that the use of this medication could cause “temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences,” however, there is little risk of serious adverse health consequences, according to the agency.

    Aronov clarified this description further by explaining that failed dissolution is not a safety hazard, nor will the drug cause harm to your body.

    “It is just a quality control issue that may result in the patient not benefiting from the medicine when they take it,” he said.

    People taking Xanax should speak with their doctor about getting a replacement prescription, Aronov said.

    “Patients should not abruptly stop taking Xanax because this medicine requires a very gradual taper in order to prevent withdrawal symptoms,” he said.

    Roger Flugel, chief scientific officer for Neurogan Health, emphasized that patients using this drug “shouldn’t panic.”

    Firstly, it’s only the 3-milligram tablets of Xanax XR in 60-tablet bottles identified by the lot number 8177156 that are affected, he said.

    “It’s important that you know the lot number before anything else, and see to it that you take the necessary steps,” said Flugel.

    Even if you have this lot number, he explained that you aren’t in any imminent danger since any health effects are temporary and reversible.

    “My advice is that you shouldn’t abruptly stop taking it, even when the lot number [of the] medication matches the one above, as that can be riskier,” Flugel said.

    Instead, continue to take your medication as directed and speak with your doctor right away about your concerns.

    No press release has been issued by the FDA for this recall, and the recall remains ongoing as of the latest available data from April 8, 2026.

    Consumers and healthcare professionals can stay informed by monitoring the FDA website or contacting Viatris directly.

  • Meta is downsizing by about 10 percent

    Meta is making another steep cut to its staff, this time to the tune of a 10 percent reduction in its workforce. About 8,000 people will be laid off and about 6,000 open jobs will also be eliminated, according to Bloomberg.

    In an internal memo from Janelle Gale, Meta’s head of human resources, the latest cuts are “part of our continued effort to run the company more efficiently and to allow us to offset the other investments we’re making.” Those “other investments” are likely in artificial intelligence. Meta is building its own models and apparently training them on its own staff. Its smart glasses are also leveraging ever-more AI capabilities.

    Today’s layoffs likely don’t mark the end of Meta’s current contraction. A report from March suggested that Meta was planning to downsize by up to 20 percent, although no timeline was given. The company cut hundreds of jobs, primarily in its Reality Labs division, shortly after those claims circulated. It also kicked off 2026 by slashing its metaverse operations with the closure of three VR studios.

  • Microsoft is reportedly offering voluntary buyouts to up to 7 percent of its employees

    Microsoft is planning to get rid of more US employees via its first voluntary buyout program, CNBC reports. The buyout program will reportedly be offered to US employees at “the senior director level and below whose years of employment and age add up to 70 or higher,” and could cover up to 7 percent of the company’s US workforce.

    With around 125,000 employees in the US as of June 2025, that could mean up to 8,750 will be offered a paid exit when Microsoft begins its program in May. That’s a smaller figure than the 15,000 or so employees the company laid off in May and July of 2025, but still significant, particularly if the majority of employees do take the buyout.

    “Our hope is that this program gives those eligible the choice to take that next step on their own terms, with generous company support,” Microsoft’s executive vice president and chief people officer Amy Coleman shared in a memo viewed by CNBC.

    Engadget has contacted Microsoft to confirm the existence of the voluntary buyout program and other details CNBC reported. We’ll update this article if we hear back.

    Microsoft used its 2025 layoffs to streamline layers of management and its video game business, but these new cuts may have a lot more to do with AI. Not necessarily because the company’s adoption of AI tools has made employees redundant, but rather because Microsoft continues to aggressively spend on AI infrastructure. The company said it spent $37.5 billion in capital expenditures during Q2 2026, much of which went toward data center buildout.

  • OpenAI Releases GPT-5.5: Faster, Smarter—And Pricier

    OpenAI Releases GPT-5.5: Faster, Smarter—And Pricier

    In brief

    • GPT-5.5 launches today for Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise users in ChatGPT and Codex, with API access coming soon at $5/M input tokens and $30/M output tokens.
    • The model achieves 82.7% on Terminal-Bench 2.0—a benchmark testing complex command-line workflows—beating Claude Opus 4.7 at 69.4% and Gemini 3.1 Pro at 68.5%.
    • GPT-5.5 uses significantly fewer tokens to complete the same Codex tasks as GPT-5.4, making it more efficient despite being priced higher.

    OpenAI launched GPT-5.5 on Thursday, pitching it essentially as a model targeted at agentic computer use. It writes and debugs code, browses the web, fills out spreadsheets, and keeps working through multi-step tasks without needing a human to babysit every move.

    The release is already rolling out today to Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise subscribers across ChatGPT and Codex, OpenAI said.

    “We’re releasing GPT‑5.5, our smartest and most intuitive-to-use model yet, and the next step toward a new way of getting work done on a computer,” OpenAI said in an announcement. “The gains are especially strong in agentic coding, computer use, knowledge work, and early scientific research—areas where progress depends on reasoning across context and taking action over time.

    Introducing GPT-5.5

    A new class of intelligence for real work and powering agents, built to understand complex goals, use tools, check its work, and carry more tasks through to completion. It marks a new way of getting computer work done.

    Now available in ChatGPT and Codex. pic.twitter.com/rPLTk99ZH5

    — OpenAI (@OpenAI) April 23, 2026

    The big headline from OpenAI: GPT-5.5 is measurably smarter than its predecessor, GPT-5.4—and it’s not slower. Matching GPT-5.4’s per-token latency in real-world serving while hitting higher scores across benchmarks is the kind of efficiency improvement that usually doesn’t happen. Bigger models tend to be slower when running under the same hardware.

    On Terminal-Bench 2.0, which tests how well a model handles complex command-line workflows that require planning and iterative tool use, GPT-5.5 scores 82.7%. Claude Opus 4.7 lands at 69.4%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro sits at 68.5%. That’s not a marginal lead.

    On GDPval, a benchmark testing knowledge work across 44 real occupations—from finance to legal research to product management—GPT-5.5 matches or beats industry professionals in 84.9% of comparisons.

    Image: OpenAI

    It’s also a pretty good coder, as expected. On Expert-SWE, an internal benchmark for long-horizon coding tasks with a median estimated human completion time of 20 hours, GPT-5.5 outperforms GPT-5.4. On SWE-Bench Pro, which grades real-world GitHub issue resolution, it reaches 58.6%. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher at 64.3%, but OpenAI claims it may be because “Anthropic reported⁠ signs of memorization on a subset of problems”

    This launch lands in a market that is moving rapidly since the boom of agentic AI. GPT-5.4 arrived just two days after GPT-5.3, while Xiaomi went from MiMo-V2-Pro to MiMo 2.5 Pro—with full multimodal capabilities—in roughly five weeks. The gap between GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.5 was about seven weeks. That’s the tempo now.

    But will this model make a difference for everyday users who are not always coding the next big thing? If you’re on a free tier, no: GPT-5.5 isn’t coming to free users. If you’re paying for Plus at $20/month, it rolls out today. We tried testing it under our Pro account, but the model was not immediately available.

    The bigger deal is probably what GPT-5.5 does inside Codex—OpenAI’s agentic coding environment—where it is proven to be more powerful. “It genuinely feels like I’m working with a higher intelligence, and there’s almost a sense of respect,” Pietro Schirano, CEO of MagicPath, said in a quote shared by OpenAI.

    GPT-5.5 Pro, designed for harder, higher-accuracy work, is rolling out separately to Pro, Business, and Enterprise users in ChatGPT. On BrowseComp, which tests a model’s ability to track down hard-to-find information across the web, GPT-5.5 Pro scores 90.1%, ahead of Gemini 3.1 Pro at 85.9%.

    The model is also the most intelligent on average based on the Artificial Analysis Index. GPT 5.5 reports a more efficient and useful use of tokens, producing better results in general.

    Image: OpenAI

    The pricing, however, could shock some users. The API will charge $5 per million input tokens and $30 per million output tokens when it launches, which OpenAI says is coming “very soon.” GPT-5.5 Pro in the API will cost $30 per million input tokens and $180 per million output tokens.

    Those figures are higher than GPT-5.4—$2.50 per million tokens of input and $15.00 per million tokens of output—while pricing for GPT-5.5 Pro remains the same as GPT-5.4 Pro.

    That said, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman argued on X that token efficiency gains offset the cost—GPT-5.5 completes the same Codex tasks with fewer tokens, which means cheaper runs even at a higher per-token rate.

    Just for comparison, Xiaomi MiMo v2.5 Pro charges $1 and $3 per million tokens of input and output, Minimax M2.7 costs $0.30 and $1.20 respectively, and Kimi K2.5 requires $0.44 and $2.00 per million tokens.

  • Following Recent Developments, JPMorgan Chase Released a Hot Crypto Report: “If This Continues, Institutional Investor Interest Will Remain Limited”

    Following Recent Developments, JPMorgan Chase Released a Hot Crypto Report: “If This Continues, Institutional Investor Interest Will Remain Limited”

    According to a new report published by US-based financial giant JPMorgan Chase, the cyberattack linked to KelpDAO caused a significant disruption in the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. Bank analysts stated that following the incident, the total value locked (TVL) on DeFi platforms decreased by approximately $20 billion in just a few days.

    The report was authored by a team of analysts led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou. The analysts added that ongoing vulnerabilities and slow growth in the DeFi sector continue to limit institutional investor interest.

    The attack reportedly stemmed from a security vulnerability in the cross-chain bridge. Through this vulnerability, attackers created approximately $292 million worth of rsETH tokens without collateral and used these tokens to borrow real $ETH via Aave. This process resulted in approximately $230 million in uncollectible debt.

    According to analysts, the impact of the incident was not limited to the assets directly targeted. “This event demonstrated that the highly interconnected nature of the DeFi ecosystem can become a vulnerability during times of stress,” they stated. LayerZero and security researchers have linked the attack to the North Korea-linked Lazarus Group. It was reported that some of the stolen funds have been frozen, while the remainder is still being transferred between different wallets.

    Related News What’s in Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin’s Altcoin Portfolio Following Recent Market Movements?

    JPMorgan noted that the total scale of hacks and security breaches in the crypto sector in 2026 is projected to be similar to 2025 levels. While progress has been made in smart contract oversight, significant risks, particularly in cross-chain bridge security, remain.

    It was also added that DeFi growth remained weak when evaluated in terms of $ETH. While the TVL in US dollars followed a trend parallel to the overall crypto market, with rapid growth before 2021, a decline in 2022, and a limited recovery afterwards, the price-adjusted $ETH-based TVL remained flat.

    The report also noted that the recent attacks have led to a significant shift in investor behavior. While traditional markets see a tendency towards cash during periods of uncertainty, a similar trend in DeFi has emerged as a move towards stablecoins.

    In this context, Tether ($USDT) has particularly stood out as a “safe haven” due to its deep liquidity on centralized exchanges and the possibility of faster exits during periods of stress. However, analysts added that this increased demand has not yet been significantly reflected in $USDT’s total market capitalization.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Rachel Sennott Desperately Wants a Met Gala Invite in Marc Jacobs’ ‘The Scene’

    Rachel Sennott put her multi-hyphenate talents to use for Marc Jacobs.

    The I Love LA star and creator toplines the new pre-fall 2026 campaign for Marc Jacobs but she did more than lend her face. Sennott wrote The Scene, a short film that centers on the Scene bag and Sennott’s aspirations to get invited to the Met Gala.

    Set in Manhattan, The Scene follows Sennott through one “chaotic, comedic day” as she navigates her way on a journey to create a viral moment in the hopes that she’ll receive a coveted invite. Some of her moments are captured through the lens of the Scene Bag. The campaign features cameos by Francesca Scorsese, Morgan Maher, True Whitaker and Sandra Bernhard.

    “This campaign is about all the chaotic, ridiculous, and funny moments that make you feel seen or completely invisible,” says Rachel Sennott. “I wanted to capture that energy through storytelling that feels true to how we live now. The collection reflects that same spirit with pieces that move with you and let you show up however you want.”

    The Scene is described as the first installment in an ongoing series of scripted micro-dramas that will roll out on Marc Jacobs’ social channels. The series is meant to “highlight how everyone is seeking to be seen and visibility is power.” It would not be a surprise to see Sennott show up on Jacobs’ arm come May 4. As for that bag that she’s clutching throughout the short, the Scene is offered in three sizes and color ways. It features signature hardware, a sculptural silhouette and a J Marc logo. The pre-fall collection also debuts new color ways of Jacobs’ tote bag and the Snapshot.

    Sennott clutches a Scene bag in Marc Jacobs’ pre-fall campaign. The pre-fall collection will be available at Marc Jacobs boutiques globally, online and at select retailers on April 30.

    Courtesy of Marc Jacobs

    Models in Marc Jacobs’ pre-fall campaign carrying the Scene bags.

    Courtesy of Marc Jacobs

  • Elizabeth Banks to Star in Apple TV Comedy About Fresh Starts and Retiree Sex Dates

    Apple TV has greenlit a comedy series starring Elizabeth Banks as a recently divorced woman — but the show will go well beyond that basic premise.

    The currently untitled series comes from creators Liz Heldens (Will Trent) and Matt Ward (Best Medicine) and Disney’s 20th Television. Here’s the logline: “Fresh off a messy divorce, Heidi (Banks) sets out to secure a lively second act for herself and her kids. But when she stumbles into coordinating her father’s retirement community sex dates, Heidi is forced into an unlikely alliance with his girlfriend’s perpetually single son.” It’s set to begin filming later this year in Los Angeles.

    Related Stories

    Without researching every comedy series logline of the recent past, THR is confident that almost none of them contain the phrase “retirement community sex dates.” The show will join a comedy roster at Apple TV that includes The Studio, Ted Lasso, Shrinking, Platonic and Stick, among others.

    Banks, currently starring in The Miniature Wife at Peacock, will also executive produce the series via her Brownstone Productions. Heldens and Ward will serve as showrunners and executive produce with Brownstone’s Max Handelman and Krissy Wall; pilot director Jonathan Krisel (FX’s Adults); Quinn Haberman of Heldens’ Selfish Mermaid banner; and Jason Winer and Jon Radler of Small Dog Picture Company.

    Banks’ TV credits also include Prime Video’s The Better Sister, Hulu’s Mrs. America and recurring parts on Modern Family and 30 Rock; she earned Emmy nominations for her work on the latter two. She’s also been nominated for an Emmy for hosting ABC’s game show Press Your Luck.

  • Sam Bankman-Fried Withdraws Motion for New Trial, Denies Ghostwriting Allegations

    Sam Bankman-Fried Withdraws Motion for New Trial, Denies Ghostwriting Allegations

    In brief

    • FTX founder and former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried has withdrawn his request for a new trial after filing a so-called Rule 33 Motion in February
    • The disgraced former crypto mogul, who is serving time in California, insisted that he was representing himself despite receiving help on the motion from his parents.
    • Bankman-Fried claimed that he was withdrawing the motion because he doesn’t believe U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan will give him a “fair hearing.”

    Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced founder of collapsed crypto exchange FTX, has withdrawn his request for a new trial while trying to distance his parents from recent legal efforts, according to a letter received by U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan’s chambers on Tuesday.

    Filed in the Southern District of New York, the letter was written by the former crypto mogul from a low-security correctional facility in Lompoc, California—roughly 3,000 miles away from the courtroom where he was sentenced in 2024 to 25 years in prison.

    In the letter received by Kaplan on Tuesday, Bankman-Fried acknowledged that he shared drafts of the Rule 33 Motion with his parents, Barbara Fried and Joe Bankman. They made editorial suggestions, he stated, some of which were incorporated into the motion. 

    Additionally, Bankman-Fried stated that his parents helped him print the document.

    Bankman-Fried had filed a so-called Rule 33 Motion in February, seeking a do-over after being convicted of orchestrating a multi-billion-dollar fraud scheme in 2023. The motion claimed that he was indicted on false allegations, such as plundering customer funds from his exchange.

    Notably, Sam Bankman-Fried filed the motion pro se, indicating that he was representing himself as his own attorney. Kaplan shot back with a court order, demanding input on whether the one-time wunderkind had received help with the request from other attorneys. Kaplan noted that Bankman-Fried risked perjury with his ensuing response.

    The request for a new trial was accompanied by a letter written by his mother, a professor at Stanford Law School. Fried stated that she had been authorized by Bankman-Fried to file the proceeding, citing her son’s ongoing incarceration.

    “They had no significant input into the ultimate motion,” Bankman-Fried stated to the judge. “I am the ultimate author of the documents and wrote the bulk of them myself, but can’t comment on how you will ultimately interpret the standard in practice.”

    Bankman-Fried also told Kaplan that he is withdrawing his pro se motion because he believes that he won’t “get a fair hearing on this topic in front of you.” His appellate lawyer had previously claimed that he was “presumed guilty” at trial by Kaplan, among others.

    Again, Bankman-Fried stated that he did not have assistance with the motion from his appellate attorney, Alexandra Shapiro, nor others who assisted with his criminal trial in 2023.

    President Donald Trump has pardoned several crypto entrepreneurs since his second term began, including Bankman-Fried’s one-time nemesis, Binance founder and former CEO Changpeng Zhao, who had pleaded guilty to anti-money laundering violations.

    The president indicated in January, however, that Bankman-Fried isn’t expected to receive similar treatment, per The New York Times. His parents have tried to curry favor with Trump, seeking lawyers who have the president’s ear, per Bloomberg.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • White House Accuses China of ‘Industrial-Scale’ Theft From American AI Models

    White House Accuses China of ‘Industrial-Scale’ Theft From American AI Models

    In brief

    • The White House says foreign entities, mainly in China, are running “industrial-scale” campaigns to copy U.S. AI models.
    • Officials say attackers use proxy accounts and jailbreaks to extract model capabilities and proprietary data.
    • The memo calls for federal agencies and private industry to develop defenses and hold foreign actors accountable.

    The White House warned Thursday that “foreign entities” are allegedly carrying out “industrial-scale” campaigns to copy the capabilities of American-based artificial intelligence models, using tactics including jailbreaking and networks of fake accounts to extract proprietary information and replicate their performance.

    In a memorandum titled “Adversarial Distillation of American AI Models,” Assistant to the President for Science and Technology and Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy Michael Kratsios said the U.S. government has information indicating coordinated efforts to distill U.S. frontier AI systems.

    “The U.S. has evidence that foreign entities, primarily in China, are running industrial-scale distillation campaigns to steal American AI,” Kratsios wrote on X. “We will be taking action to protect American innovation.”

    According to President Donald Trump’s administration, the campaigns are using “tens of thousands of proxy accounts” to evade detection and exploit jailbreak techniques to systematically extract capabilities, in what is known as a distillation attack.

    A distillation attack is a method of training a smaller AI model to learn from the outputs of a larger one. The issue has become a growing concern among U.S. AI companies. In February, Anthropic accused Chinese AI labs DeepSeek, Moonshot, and MiniMax of extracting millions of Claude responses—using roughly 24,000 fraudulent accounts—to train competing systems.

    Models developed through unauthorized distillation campaigns may not match the full performance of the originals. Still, they can appear comparable on select benchmarks at a fraction of the cost.

    The administration warned that distillation attacks could also remove security safeguards and other controls designed to keep AI systems “ideologically neutral and truth-seeking.”

    The Trump administration said federal agencies will work with U.S. AI companies to strengthen protections around frontier models, coordinate with private industry to develop defenses against large-scale distillation campaigns, and explore ways to hold foreign actors accountable.

    While the memo acknowledged that lawful distillation can help create smaller, more efficient open-source and open-weight models, it said unauthorized efforts to copy American AI systems cross the line.

    “There is nothing innovative about systematically extracting and copying the innovations of American industry,” the memo said.

    The Office of Science and Technology did not immediately respond to a request for comment by Decrypt.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Mixed views in Lebanon ahead of controversial talks with Israel

    Mixed views in Lebanon ahead of controversial talks with Israel

    Beirut, Lebanon – At a store in Beirut, a shopowner breaks into laughter.

    “No, I don’t want to comment on the negotiations,” he told Al Jazeera, referring to Thursday evening’s direct talks between Israel and Lebanon in Washington, DC. “If I say the wrong thing, someone might come hit me.”

    Recommended Stories

    list of 4 itemsend of list

    His response represents the polarisation and controversy surrounding the negotiations inside a country deeply divided over the best way to end Israel’s war on it.

    For some, the negotiations are the Lebanese state’s only choice. Others, however, reject the talks outright and believe only Hezbollah’s path of armed resistance will lead to a positive outcome for Lebanon.

    A deal favourable to Israel?

    On March 2, Israel intensified its war on Lebanon once again. That came after Hezbollah responded to incessant Israeli attacks for the first time in more than 15 months. Hezbollah said its response was also a retaliation for the Israeli-US killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei two days earlier.

    Israel has killed 2,294 people in Lebanon since March 2, including journalists and medics. It has also displaced more than 1.2 million people while expanding its invasion of Lebanon and establishing what it calls a “yellow line” around 10km (6 miles) from the border. Residents are not allowed to return to their homes if they are within that Israeli-claimed buffer zone, and Israel has demolished homes and villages in it.

    Al Jazeera visited three towns – al-Mansouri, Majdal Zoun, and Qlaileh – on a tour organised by Hezbollah, the Lebanese political and military group that controls the area. The towns were rife with destruction, with buildings reduced to dust and rubble.

    Thursday’s talks are set to take place while Israel is still on Lebanese land and conducting demolitions and attacks on targets there. On Wednesday, Israel killed five people in Lebanon, including front-line reporter Amal Khalil. And on Thursday, the Lebanese Health Ministry reported that an Israeli attack had killed three people.

    The talks are the first direct negotiations between the two sides in decades and follow an initial meeting on April 14 in Washington, DC. They will bring together Lebanon and Israel’s ambassadors to the United States, as well as the US ambassadors to Lebanon – Michael Issa – and Israel – Mike Huckabee – with the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. All were present in the initial meeting, apart from Huckabee.

    The Lebanese side will ask for an extension to the current ceasefire, which Israel has repeatedly violated, as a precondition for continuing the talks. Lebanon’s Prime Minister Nawaf Salam has said his country will also seek a full Israeli withdrawal and the return of Lebanese captives held by Israel.

    For its part, Hezbollah has rejected the talks. And a day before the previous talks earlier in April, hundreds of protesters descended on downtown Beirut to show their opposition to the talks, too.

    Some of these opposing talks believe that Iran, Hezbollah’s longtime benefactor, has more leverage to negotiate on its behalf. But others oppose the talks simply because they believe the Lebanese state has little leverage and because Israel rarely delivers or upholds its end of bargains.

    “Probably the only deal that’s possible right now at the moment is anything that’s very favourable to Israel, as we have seen in the past many years, and especially since Lebanon is going there unprepared, with no leverage and no deterrence,” Fouad Debs, a lawyer, told Al Jazeera. “The only deterrence that they have at the moment is the resistance [Hezbollah], and the government and president are fighting it internally.”

    Debs said that Lebanon could look at other pathways, such as going to the International Criminal Court and teaming up with the growing number of countries that are trying to hold Israel accountable.

    A history ‘full of blood’

    Shortly after Hezbollah’s attacks on March 2, the Lebanese government declared Hezbollah’s military activities illegal.

    Hezbollah’s weapons have long been a point of contention in Lebanon. In 1990, when the Lebanese civil war ended after 15 years, all militias handed over their arms. But Hezbollah members kept theirs as a means of opposing Israeli occupation in south Lebanon.

    When Israel pulled out of southern Lebanon in 2000, the debate about Hezbollah’s weapons renewed. That would prove to be the pinnacle of the group’s domestic popularity, as internal disputes over its arms followed. Today, Hezbollah enjoys little support in Lebanon outside of the Shia Muslim community.

    After the 2024 ceasefire brought Israel’s last intensification to an end, the Lebanese state vowed to disarm Hezbollah. It assigned the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) with the task. And while the LAF made some progress, Hezbollah’s critics, including Israelis and Americans, argued that it hadn’t moved fast enough.

    Now, following Israeli attacks that have left thousands dead and more than a million displaced, some Lebanese are calling for a different strategy.

    “Lebanese history with Israel is full of blood,” Jad Shahrour, a communications manager at the Samir Kassir Foundation, told Al Jazeera, adding that any negotiations must take that history into account.

    Little leverage

    Shahrour said he believes that negotiations do not necessarily mean full normalisation. Instead, he said, he sees negotiations as a first step in the state reasserting its authority over Lebanon.

    “What options do we have besides this?” he asked rhetorically. “Do we have any power? No. But did Hezbollah’s way get the desired result? Also, no.”

    Shahrour recognised that Lebanon has little leverage.

    “One can say they reject this. but our options are limited and it is better to try diplomacy than not try at all,” he said. “If we say no. then bombing returns to Beirut, the Israelis will enter even further, and neither Hezbollah nor the state can protect the people.”

    Most people in Lebanon do not trust the Israelis to be good-faith actors, and do not see the US as a neutral party in negotiations. The difference then comes down to whether or not this is the best of all bad options – or if armed resistance, asking Iran to negotiate on Lebanon’s behalf, or an international approach would be smarter moves.

    Even with little to no leverage, however, some experts believe Lebanon has more cards it can play.

    “Lebanon should establish its own terms of reference in the negotiations, not allow them to undermine the state’s standing and alienate it from a regional bloc that opposes Israel,” Mohanad Hage Ali, the deputy director for research at the Carnegie Middle East Center, wrote in a recent piece. “A balancing act of this kind may invite criticism in the short term, but it is more likely to yield durable results over time.”