Tag: Deadline News

  • ‘60 Minutes’ Season Premiere Averages 7.94 Million Viewers, A Falloff From Last Year’s Debut

    ‘60 Minutes’ Season Premiere Averages 7.94 Million Viewers, A Falloff From Last Year’s Debut

    The season premiere of 60 Minutes averaged 7.94 million viewers Sunday, off from the more than 10 million who tuned in to last year’s debut.

    The first episode of the show’s 59th season was highly anticipated — and scrutinized — following the shakeup at the newsmagazine last spring, despite its status as one of the network’s top-rated programs.

    The season premiere was off by 21% compared to the September 28 debut last year, but there are some caveats to the figure, as tends to be the case during the NFL season.

    The broadcast was delayed in Eastern and Central time zones because of the Minnesota Vikings-Green Bay Packers game, and that football lead-in also was off by 21%, averaging 18.6 million viewers.

    CBS‘s NFL coverage also faced competition from football on Fox, and the final part of 60 Minutes went up against NBC’s telecast of the Dallas Cowboys-New York Giants game on Sunday Night Football. The first quarter hour of 60 Minutes averaged 9.4 million and dropped to 6.7 million in the final quarter hour. Networks also are pointing to changes in Nielsen’s methodology.

    In the adults 25-54 demo, 60 Minutes averaged 1.58 million viewers, down 33% from 2.36 million for last year’s premiere.

    CBS News said in a statement, “We are so proud of the exceptional journalism on display in our season premiere and we can’t wait to bring our audience another amazing show this coming Sunday.”

    Last spring, CBS News editor in chief Bari Weiss replaced executive producer Tanya Simon with Nick Bilton, and three correspondents including Sharyn Alfonsi, Cecilia Vega and Scott Pelley were fired. The season premiere featured some new graphics and the introduction of a new correspondent, Ross Douthat. Stories featured included an exclusive interview with an airman shot down and rescued from Iran, a report on brokers collecting huge sums to secure clients’ pardons from Donald Trump, and a profile of the Los Angeles Rams.

  • Donald Trump Says There Already Are Enough Guardrails Around AI

    Donald Trump Says There Already Are Enough Guardrails Around AI

    Amid the increasing alarm over AI‘s supercharged capabilities, Donald Trump rejected calls for new regulation, saying that there already are guardrails in place.

    In a Truth Social post on Monday, Trump wrote, “The only control or ‘guardrails’ that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades! The Trump Administration has stopped AI ‘people’ from doing bad, or potentially bad, ‘things,’ like Dario (Anthropic!), who is now pretending to be a ‘perfect little angel’ – and we will continue to do so! We already have tremendous CRIMINAL and REGULATORY power over these companies! There is a SICK conspiracy going on against AI and Data Centers, and the only one that is happy about it is China. WHOEVER WINS AI, WINS! We are leading China, and all others, and will continue to do so. Conspiracy Theorists, Treasonists, Traitors, and Leakers, BEWARE!”

    Later, he posted, “The claim that ‘AI is going to take over the World’ is a Hoax, just like Global ‘Warming,’ where everyone was going to be dead by now, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, UKRAINE, UKRAINE, UKRAINE, or Impeachment Hoax #1, or Impeachment Hoax #2. These are all Radical Left Dumocrats, who never give up, but seldom win. Hopefully, the Voters have seen the light!”

    On Saturday, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei posted an essay in which he called for slowing down AI development, warning that a “swarm” of AI agents could be capable of taking over the internet in 6-12 months.

    He wrote, “Given the accelerating rate of AI capability development, it’s my worry that in 6–12 months such a swarm could be capable of taking over the entire internet with a persistent botnet (potentially causing hundreds of billions of dollars in damage), and that the scale of damage would continue to increase from there if AI becomes more powerful without the necessary guardrails.”

    Amodei called on AI companies to commit to third-party evaluators “to verify adherence to safety practices and commitments, report incidents, and help assess the alignment of not just completed AI models but training pipelines and processes.”

    Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, and Elon Musk, founder of SpaceXAI, signalled agreement with Amodei.

    Amodei also called on governments to coordinate on safety standards.

    Trump, though, has warned of a slowdown in AI development ceding the technological arms race to China. He also has chided communities that have tried to block the construction of data centers, even though the backlash against the sprawling developments has come from both parties.

  • Kennedy Center Warns Of Bankruptcy, Ties Donald Trump’s Leadership Of “Financial Rescue” To Restoration Of His Name To Arts Institution

    Kennedy Center Warns Of Bankruptcy, Ties Donald Trump’s Leadership Of “Financial Rescue” To Restoration Of His Name To Arts Institution

    UPDATED: There is a new wrinkle in the ongoing saga over the Kennedy Center: Officials with the institution are warning of “certain financial collapse within weeks” and say that restoring Donald Trump‘s name to the complex may be the only way to get him to “lead the financial rescue of the center.”

    A draft board resolution, outlined in court documents on Monday, states that the center “is in such a precarious fiscal position that it will not be able to support its payroll obligations, nor routine maintenance contracts within a matter of weeks.”

    The resolution also states that Trump, who serves as the center’s chairman, has offered to “step in and raise the necessary funds to keep the Center from bankruptcy during its much needed renovation.” The resolution adds that the board “is seeking to appropriately recognize and acknowledge President Trump for his well timed proffer of fiscal rescue. The Board understands that without such appropriate recognition it is unlikely that President Trump will provide the fundamental oversight of the renovation of the main building and lead the fiscal rescue of the Center.”

    The draft resolutions were submitted in court documents by attorneys for Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH), an ex officio member of the board who fought an earlier effort to add Trump’s name to the institution and plans to close the complex for two years for renovations.

    The Washington Post first reported on the proposed resolution as well as another calling for the immediate shutdown of the main complex. That resolution follows a recent incident in which a leak after heavy rains caused a portion of the ceiling plaster to detach.

    The resolutions are expected to come before the center’s board meeting on Tuesday.

    A federal judge ruled in May that the board lacked authority to add Trump’s name to the center late last year, and he ordered it removed from Kennedy Center materials and the front facade.

    More recently, the board voted on a new resolution to add Trump’s name as many as three times to the center’s grounds. On the facade, below its official name, “The John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts,” there would be an additional line reading “Restored and Renovated by President Donald J. Trump.”

    Once a $100 million threshold is met for an endowment the board set up for the center, per the resolution, a line would be added to read, “Endowed by the Trump Kennedy Center Fund.”

    The board also voted to designate “the physical site and grounds upon which the center sits” as the “President Donald J. Trump Plaza.”

    The newest resolution presents 10 different options for installing Trump’s name on the front.

    The judge in Beatty’s lawsuit, Christopher Cooper, is currently considering whether the new naming proposal complies with his earlier ruling.

    The board also voted last month to close most of the complex for renovations. The latest resolution cites the recent partial ceiling collapse and states that the board “believes that the risk associated with exposing patrons and employees to a hazardous building greatly outweighs any reputational risk
    associated with closing the main building.” The resolution notes that programming would still continue at The Reach, the extension to the center that opened in 2019, while the National Symphony Orchestra would continue at alternate venues. The Kennedy Center Honors and the Mark Twain Prize also would continue at alternate venues.

    Congress included more than $250 million in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last year for Kennedy Center renovations. But since Trump’s takeover of the center just weeks into his second term, the center saw a drop in ticket sales and, after the president’s name was added to the complex in December, another wave of artist cancellations.

    Cooper is holding a scheduling conference on Tuesday on the latest closure plan. Cooper’s injunction also prohibited the institution from closing unless the board more fully considered the impact of a shutdown.

    A Kennedy Center spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Beatty’s attorneys, Norm Eisen and Nathaniel Zelinsky, said in a statement, “This constant effort to add Donald Trump’s name to the Kennedy Center facade is the definition of insanity. This is now the third attempt to deface this sacred memorial and turn it into a vanity project for one man’s ego. Worse still, now Trump is taking the Center hostage and threatening to in effect kill it unless he gets his way. This has to stop.”

  • Better Call Odenkirk: Watch L.A. Mayoral Candidate Nithya Raman’s FYC Ad Voiced By Emmy Winner;  Spot To Run During TV’s Big Night

    Better Call Odenkirk: Watch L.A. Mayoral Candidate Nithya Raman’s FYC Ad Voiced By Emmy Winner; Spot To Run During TV’s Big Night

    EXCLUSIVE: When it’s time to get serious, it never hurts to have Saul Goodman in your corner — especially on Emmy night, especially if you’re aiming to be the next Mayor of L.A.

    That’s exactly what Nithya Raman is doing tonight with Bob Odenkirk-voiced campaign ad set to drop right before the local NBC affiliate’s broadcast of TV’s biggest night. The ad will actually play two times before the Emmys, once afterwards on KNBC’s post-Emmys news broadcast, and one more time on Tuesday morning on The Today Show.

    Promising that the current Councilmember will “fight to keep Hollywood in Hollywood,” the slick 30-second spot leans right into the ceremony itself with a For Your Consideration vibe and theme. It’s right there in the first words spoken by two-time Emmy winner Odenkirk: “For your consideration: A mayor who loves L.A. as much as we do.”

    Take at Raman’s Emmy-ish ad here:

    “Los Angeles has so many eager, skilled people who want to work in our industry– we deserve a city and leaders who fight to achieve the conditions to make that work happen,” longtime Raman supporter Odenkirk told Deadline today of putting his mouth literally where his donor dollars have been going.

    Having survived a something bruising primary against incumbent Karen Bass and Hills alum Spencer Pratt, Raman in July scored the second run-off spot for the November election. A vocal opponent of Paramount’s $111 billion merger with Warner Bros Discovery, Raman has made the exodus of jobs and production from Hollywood in recent years a core issue in what was once a long longshot bid for the big City Hall chair. First elected in 2020 in an upset race, Raman is running close to Bass in the Mayoral polls, and has seen an uptick as the campaign has kicked into post-summer high-gear.

    With a national film and TV tax credit now being backed by both Donald Trump and Democrats like Sen Adam Schiff (D-CA) to help the industry, which has lost over 50,000 jobs over the past six years, Raman’s Tinseltown focus (and a plan she released in the spring) has taken centerstage.

    Coming with its four airings in about 12 hours, the release of today’s big swing ad, the spouse of 30 Rock producer Vali Chandrasekaran wants to put the topic of Tinseltown’s crisis, as well as issues of affordability and potholes, right in front of Angelenos watching TV tonight.

    “The entertainment industry isn’t just the creative engine of Los Angeles, it’s an economic engine for the entire city. Film and television production supports restaurants, dry cleaners, hardware stores, hotels, prop houses, rental yards, post-production shops and thousands of small businesses,” Raman said to Deadline this morning..

    “City Hall should be fighting every day to keep those jobs here, instead of watching passively as Hollywood is hollowed out,” she added. “As mayor, I will make Los Angeles a place where productions can stay, workers can build stable careers and the next generation of storytellers can afford to live.”

    Hosted by Law & Order: SVU star Mariska Hargitay, the78th Primetime Emmy Awards airs live Monday from DTLA on NBC and and Peacock at 5 p.m. PT/8 p.m. ET.

  • ’60 Minutes’ Debuts New Season With A Pentagon Exclusive And Hidden Camera Expose — Amid Plenty Of Scrutiny Of The Show Itself

    ’60 Minutes’ Debuts New Season With A Pentagon Exclusive And Hidden Camera Expose — Amid Plenty Of Scrutiny Of The Show Itself

    60 Minutes debuted its new season on Sunday with an exclusive sit down with an Air Force officer who told of his harrowing rescue in Iran. It featured a hideen camera segment on pardon brokers who collect hundreds of thousands or even millions to try to secure Trump’s clemency. And it profile the Los Angeles Rams and head coach Sean McVay.

    Yet despite new graphics, the debut of new correspondent Ross Douthat for its one-minute ender, and an increased social media presence, the show had much the same look and feel of previous seasons. The story selection was in the realm of past seasons.

    What is different, though, is the extra scrutiny the show is under, in the wake of the purge last spring of executive producer Tanya Simon and top producers, as well as correspondents Cecilia Vega, Sharyn Alfonsi and Scott Pelley, each of whom has accused the executive higher ups of interference. Just this past week, the former managing editor called the show “a casualty of corporate priorities and ideological intrusion.” CBS News editor in chief Bari Weiss pushed back on the claim in June, telling The Wall Street Journal, “What’s being called ‘editorial interference’ is in reality the job description of an editor in chief.” And shortly after he became the new executive producer, Nick Bilton told staffers that the show “will never be instructed by the ownership of the company on these stories.”

    The corporate ownership has done plenty to raise suspicions, starting with the decision by the previous owners of Paramount, the parent company of CBS, to settle a lawsuit Donald Trump filed against the network for the way that 60 Minutes edited an interview with Kamala Harris. Then, new owners Skydance have waged a not-so-subtle effort to woo Trump as it sought administration sign off for its proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery.

    Interference or not, the risk that 60 Minutes faces is ratings, or losing the show’s position as the No. 1 news show on television.

    The first segment was Norah O’Donnell’s exclusive sit down with an Air Force colonel whose plane was shot down over Iran, who relayed the story of his survival and then rescue, calling it a “modern day miracle.” The network had extensive cooperation from the Pentagon, with interviews with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as well as declassified footage of the operation.

    The segment was narrowly focused on the rescue itself, as the officer described his free fall, major injuries and his ascent up a 7,000 foot ridgeline before being spotted two days later. The officer said at the end of the segment, “It’s a story of the teamwork, the training, of the faith, of the decisions and the leadership to do something that will live in history as an example of what America’s willing to do, in order to uphold our promise and leave no man behind.”

    The sit down was one that all networks crave, and it is one that the Pentagon has been anxious to promote. There was a mention during the segment of the “costly and unpopular war that has taken the lives of 18 service members.” It remains to be seen how 60 Minutes will explore further aspects of the conflict, and if it will turn its attention to one of the more alarming stories circling in D.C.: Hegseth’s purge of top experienced generals.

    The next segment put a spotlight on pardon brokers, with a hidden camera used to capture two of them, Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl, as they tried to entice Ammon Covino, a convicted felon, and his wife, Crystal, into spending $300,000 for their alleged ability to get a pardon request in front of Donald Trump.

    The camera caught Burkman telling them, “You have to put pressure on the president from all directions in a consistent way to force his hand. We literally want to put the pen in his hand and get him to sign it because he’s tired of hearing about it.”

    The show pointed out that Burkman and Wohl are well known for their political stunts, so their involvement in business of pardon brokering isn’t all that shocking. In the footage that aired, they didn’t seem all that rattled by the revelation of a hidden camera. They also tried to engage in a bit of relativism, i.e. that their activity was little different from what went on in the Biden and Obama administration.

    That’s why the more telling moment of Lesley Stahl’s segment were the stats: About 70% of Trump’s clemencies in his second term have not gone through the standard channels the DOJ. If the president’s pardons of the January 6th rioters are included, the figure is 92%. And while the White House claimed that Trump was behaving in an “ethically sound manner,” the segment pointedly featured a college professor who said that, despite the proliferation of brokers charging ever higher fees, “in the end, it falls on the administration.”

    Also important is that the show ran through some of the notables who did get pardons, including the CEO of Binance who “boosted a Trump family crypto venture, though both sides deny any connection to the pardon,” Stahl noted.

    The third segment was devoted to the Los Angeles Rams, with 60 Minutes and Bill Wertheim getting access to its preseason practice, billing the team “as maybe the — premier NFL franchise: blue chip; gold standard.”

    There wasn’t mention of the drubbing that the Rams took in its opener against the 49ers, but that was perhaps foreshadowed by McVay during his interview. He said, “Success is never linear, you know? It’s– it– it’s always up and down.” He also admitted that he was “not in a good place right now,” referring to the progress of practice.

    Douthat appeared for the closing segment, The Last Minute, to talk about the latest warnings about AI, but he also made a pitch for the show’s future, with the drama of the last year left unsaid. “We may have a narrow window this year, not the next 10, to make artificial intelligence safe for humanity,” he said. “That clock is ticking, and so is ours. For almost 60 years, it has meant the same thing: Journalism you can trust. Where we’re headed, we’re going to need it.”

  • FCC Chairman Brendan Carr Accuses James Talarico Of Running A “Hoax” With Jimmy Kimmel Sit-Down; YouTube Interview Nears 7 Million Views

    FCC Chairman Brendan Carr Accuses James Talarico Of Running A “Hoax” With Jimmy Kimmel Sit-Down; YouTube Interview Nears 7 Million Views

    As Jimmy Kimmel‘s interview with James Talarico nears 7 million views on YouTube, FCC chairman Brendan Carr weighed in on Saturday evening, accusing the Texas U.S. Senate candidate of orchestrating a “hoax” to drive up “clicks and donations.”

    Earlier this week, Kimmel told viewers that he would be sitting down with an interview with Talarico for his ABC late-night show, but that it would be posted to YouTube and not broadcast because of the FCC’s crackdown on its equal time rule.

    In a post on X, Carr accused Talarico of “just running the same hoax he did a few months ago on Colbert for the purpose of getting clicks and donations — he’s banking on people not understanding the statute or operating as partisan lemmings.”

    He also posted a meme of Talarico riding on a bicycle on Kimmel’s back before Kimmel puts a stick in the spokes and it crashes to the ground.

    A Talarico campaign spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Kimmel interview had drawn 6.8 million views as of Saturday evening.

    In February, Stephen Colbert posted an interview with Talarico to YouTube, telling viewers that he was warned by network executives about featuring the candidate on the broadcast. That interview generated 9.6 million views on YouTube. Like the Kimmel interview, the YouTube views were well over the average audience for the actual late-night broadcast.

    In an interview this week, Talarico characterized the Kimmel incident as government censorship and a form of “cancel culture.” He also posted the interview to X, calling it “the interview Trump’s FCC doesn’t want you to see.”

    For decades, daytime and late-night TV talk shows have operated on the assumption that they were exempt from the FCC’s equal time rule, which requires broadcasters who feature candidates to provide comparable time to their rivals, if it is requested. News coverage and news interviews have been exempt from the requirements, and the rule also does not apply cable or streaming, where the FCC’s authority is limited.

    But in January, the FCC under Carr, appointed by Donald Trump, issued guidance to broadcasters that TV talk shows actually may not be exempt, a move that critics saw as a regulatory effort to crack down on daytime and late-night hosts the president does not like. Within weeks, the agency launched an investigation of ABC’s The View after it featured Talarico as a guest.

    Until now, Carr had yet to weigh in on Kimmel’s latest criticisms and the decision to move the interview to YouTube. The late night host called the FCC’s equal time enforcement threats an effort to “make our editorial decisions for us, which of course we cannot accept.”

    On Thursday, a White House spokesperson said that Kimmel was “play acting” to “create a false narrative,” and that Carr “has not threatened him regarding interviewing James Talarico, or any other candidate.”

    Carr has denied that the FCC’s stricter enforcement of the equal time rule was an attempt to censor guests.

    On X, Carr posted, “The Equal Time statute does not prohibit anyone from interviewing anyone on broadcast tv. It is about more speech, not less. Congress wanted to ensure that voters would decide elections, not media gatekeepers picking winners and losers by providing preferential airtime to some candidates and not others. Indeed, when the statute applies, it simply requires broadcast stations to offer comparable time and placement. And comparable does not necessarily mean an interview by the same person on the same program either.”

    Carr’s comments were in response to a post from University of Texas Democrats, who noted the appearance of Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on ESPN’s College GameDay on Saturday. The group posted on X, “So I can’t watch Talarico on Kimmel but I have to watch Ted Cruz on GameDay?”

    The FCC chairman noted that the equal time rule would not apply to Cruz’s appearance because it was on a cable network and because the regulation covers only legal qualified candidates, or contenders who are in the midst of an election campaign. Cruz is not up for reelection this year; Talarico’s Republican rival is Ken Paxton.

    ABC is challenging the FCC’s enforcement of the rule when it comes to The View, pointing out that the agency affirmed its exemption from the regulation in a 2002 letter.

    The network also has sued the FCC on First Amendment grounds. It claims that the agency’s order that its eight owned stations submit to early license renewals is a form of regulatory retaliation, due to the Trump administration’s dislike of its news coverage and other content including The View and Kimmel.

    In his post, Carr again defended the FCC’s regulatory efforts as within the bounds of the agency’s authority.

    He wrote, “In exchange for that free and exclusive right to use spectrum, broadcasters made a deal with the American people. They agreed to operate, not in their own narrow interests, but in the public interest. There are various rules and policies that they must follow. This sets them apart from newspapers and cable shows and podcasts. But some broadcasters want to break their deal with the American people. They want to keep their free access to billions of dollars worth of spectrum, of course. They are less eager these days to abide by their public interest obligations.”

    ABC’s legal team has argued that the FCC is engaging in selective enforcement, as its January guidance did not target conservative talk radio, and wrote that the equal time rule is unworkable for shows like The View as it puts network stations on the hook for time to potentially dozens of candidates on the ballot. Kimmel said this week that he would love to interview Paxton, but “our affiliates in Texas would have to give equal time to as many candidates as there are on the ballot. There’s about 10 candidates on the ballot.”

  • Anthropic CEO Calls For Slowing Down AI Development, Warns Of “Swarm” Taking Over Internet In 6-12 Months

    Anthropic CEO Calls For Slowing Down AI Development, Warns Of “Swarm” Taking Over Internet In 6-12 Months

    The CEO of Anthropic has called for slowing down, or “pacing,” the speed of AI development, warning of recent incidents that have caused alarm that the technology will get out of control and act on its own.

    In an essay posted to his website on Saturday, CEO Dario Amodei wrote that “over the last few months, I have become convinced that fully addressing the risks requires even more prudence — not just investing in risk prevention, but pacing the rate of capabilities advancement so that risk prevention has time to keep up. We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models. Progress will still seem fast, and we must make wise use of the time we gain.”

    He added, “I believe that if slowing down bought us even an extra year or two before models reach critical levels of capability, and we used that time to advance alignment, we could greatly reduce the risk that something goes seriously wrong.”

    He also made a reference to public perceptions, with polls showing the public’s anxieties toward AI and, in particular, the construction of data centers. Amodei wrote, “More generally, society must have a say in how this technology is used, and more time for the necessary public deliberations — which pacing the frontier would bring us — is surely a good thing.”

    In response to Amodei’s post, San Altman, the CEO of Anthropic rival OpenAI, wrote on X that he agrees that “we need to pace the frontier. This has been a primary topic of discussions we’ve had at OpenAI in recent weeks.”

    Amodei also cited what is known as the “OpenAI-Hugging Face incident,” in which AI agents carried out cyber attacks on targets they were not asked to, and went after the “grader” set to evaluate their performance. He said that less severe incidents have happened at other companies, including Anthropic.

    He wrote, “Given the accelerating rate of AI capability development, it’s my worry that in 6–12 months such a swarm could be capable of taking over the entire internet with a persistent botnet (potentially causing hundreds of billions of dollars in damage), and that the scale of damage would continue to increase from there if AI becomes more powerful without the necessary guardrails.”

    In the essay, Amodei said that Anthropic was committing to an embedded team of third-party evaluators “to verify adherence to safety practices and commitments, report incidents, and help assess the alignment of not just completed AI models but training pipelines and processes.”

    In his response, Altman wrote that committing to independent evaluators was a “great idea,” and “we will do the same.”

    Amodei also called for AI companies in democratic countries to coordinate to establish common safety standards and to set limits “on the rate of unchecked AI progress.” And he called for the U.S. and other democratic governments to attempt to coordinate on safety standards and limits with authoritarian governments.

    Amodei’s essay comes days after a researcher at Anthropic, Jacob Coxon, resigned. He previously worked at OpenAI and warned that “neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.”

    He wrote, “Do not underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing.”

    He added, “A common response is ‘if they truly believe this, why are they still building it?’ At OpenAI, many have not deeply internalized the civilizational stakes. At Anthropic, the stakes are well-understood, but they are locked in a race to get there first – they believe no one else will act responsibly, so they must do it themselves, despite the risk.”

  • Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    In the latest twist in the Jimmy Kimmel–James Talarico interview drama, the White House is now accusing the ABC late-night host and his network of spinning a fake tale of federal strong-arming.

    Put another way, Team Trump insists there was never pressure put on Kimmel and ABC from the Trump administration to scuttle an interview with the poll-topping Texas Democrat and Senate hopeful.

    “Jimmy Kimmel is play-acting — as he often does — to create a false narrative about this administration’s policies,” Assistant White House Press Secretary Davis Ingle said Thursday.

    “Chairman Carr has not threatened him regarding interviewing James Talarico, or any other candidate.,” Ingle added of Carr, the FCC chairman, just before the second night of Donald Trump‘s GOP midterm convention aka pageant reconvenes. “Any media outlet blindly amplifying Kimmel’s egocentric delusion should insist on proof. Of which they will find none.”

    ABC parent company Disney had no comment on the response from the White House when contacted by Deadline. The lack of response is unsurprising given that the company is the midst of an escalating legal and regulatory First Amendment clash with the FCC over station license renewals and charges of political thumbs on the scale.

    Jimmy Kimmel

    ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!‘

    ABC/YouTube

    Wednesday’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! monologue had some distinct déjà vu of what Stephen Colbert went through on CBS last year with Talarico, who is looking to flip the Lone Star state for the Dems for the first time in decades. The L.A.-based Kimmel revealed that an on-air sit-down with Talarico would not air on ABC tonight.

    After naming off various political candidates including Trump, who Kimmel has talked to over the years, the Live! host put federal regulatory enforcement under the spotlight. “[The] FCC has threatened me, threatened our show, threatened our network, ABC, our affiliates, our local stations, based on simple, traditional editorial decisions,” Kimmel said. “Guest bookings, it would seem, they don’t like.”

    “And so, out of consideration for our local stations, especially our ABC affiliates in Texas who would have to deal with this nonsense, my interview tomorrow with James Talarico will not air on television,” he stated. “It will be posted on YouTube instead.”

    James Talarico

    James Talarico

    Brandon Bell/Getty Images

    Interestingly, Talarico, who is in Los Angeles today and Friday for a series of deep-pocket Hollywood fundraisers, was not officially listed as a guest on Kimmel before the host made his announcement. In a separate interview with MS NOW’s Symone Sanders Townsend today on The Weeknight, Talarico called the Kimmel situation the “most dangerous form of cancel culture.” With the knowledge that much of the consumption of late-night shows actually happens online anyway, the candidate went on to say: “I’m still hopeful that we can have this interview on the air. So we’ll see what happens tonight.”

    Between Trump in Texas and Talarico in California, we certainly will.

    At the same time, with the wounds still fresh from Disney’s sudden sidelining of Kimmel for almost a week a year ago over affiliate fallout from a remark he made about the tragic assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, there is a tendency for some to get lost in the weeds of this. There is also a tendency for some to start shouting about equal-time rules without a read of the fine print.

    The equal time rule requires broadcasters that feature political candidates offer comparable airtime to rivals — if it is requested. Daytime and late-night talks shows have long operated under the assumption that they fell under an exemption for news and news interview programming. But in January, Carr issued guidance suggesting that such talk shows may not be free from the rule.

    The equal time rule also is often misunderstood. It applies to political candidates in a certain cycle. So, for instance, Ted Cruz’s appearance on The View this week makes no difference because he’s not up for reelection this midterm.

    Carr has argued that nothing is preventing late-night or daytime talk shows from featuring a political candidate as a guest. They just have to be prepared to offer time to rivals as well.

    As ABC pushes back on Carr’s investigation of The View, the network’s argument is one of selective enforcement as the FCC chairman has not singled out other broadcasters, like conservative talk radio. The network has also pointed to a 2002 letter from the FCC confirming the show’s exemption from the equal time rule. The network also has characterized the equal time rule as unworkable, given that its stations may be on the hook not just for major party candidates but also third-party rivals.

    Again, let’s see what happens tonight.

    Worth noting that when the now axed Colbert’s interview with Talarico was shifted over to YouTube, it got a huge number of views and the candidate raised more than $2.5 million in just over 24 hours. That might be history worth repeating itself for the Texas Democrat, false narrative or not.

  • Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    In the latest twist in the Jimmy Kimmel–James Talarico interview drama, the White House is now accusing the ABC late-night host and his network of spinning a fake tale of federal strong-arming.

    Put another way, Team Trump insists there was never pressure put on Kimmel and ABC from the Trump administration to scuttle an interview with the poll-topping Texas Democrat and Senate hopeful.

    “Jimmy Kimmel is play-acting — as he often does — to create a false narrative about this administration’s policies,” Assistant White House Press Secretary Davis Ingle said Thursday.

    “Chairman Carr has not threatened him regarding interviewing James Talarico, or any other candidate.,” Ingle added of Carr, the FCC chairman, just before the second night of Donald Trump‘s GOP midterm convention aka pageant reconvenes. “Any media outlet blindly amplifying Kimmel’s egocentric delusion should insist on proof. Of which they will find none.”

    ABC parent company Disney had no comment on the response from the White House when contacted by Deadline. The lack of response is unsurprising given that the company is the midst of an escalating legal and regulatory First Amendment clash with the FCC over station license renewals and charges of political thumbs on the scale.

    Jimmy Kimmel

    ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!‘

    ABC/YouTube

    Wednesday’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! monologue had some distinct déjà vu of what Stephen Colbert went through on CBS last year with Talarico, who is looking to flip the Lone Star state for the Dems for the first time in decades. The L.A.-based Kimmel revealed that an on-air sit-down with Talarico would not air on ABC tonight.

    After naming off various political candidates including Trump, who Kimmel has talked to over the years, the Live! host put federal regulatory enforcement under the spotlight. “[The] FCC has threatened me, threatened our show, threatened our network, ABC, our affiliates, our local stations, based on simple, traditional editorial decisions,” Kimmel said. “Guest bookings, it would seem, they don’t like.”

    “And so, out of consideration for our local stations, especially our ABC affiliates in Texas who would have to deal with this nonsense, my interview tomorrow with James Talarico will not air on television,” he stated. “It will be posted on YouTube instead.”

    James Talarico

    James Talarico

    Brandon Bell/Getty Images

    Interestingly, Talarico, who is in Los Angeles today and Friday for a series of deep-pocket Hollywood fundraisers, was not officially listed as a guest on Kimmel before the host made his announcement. In a separate interview with MS NOW’s Symone Sanders Townsend today on The Weeknight, Talarico called the Kimmel situation the “most dangerous form of cancel culture.” With the knowledge that much of the consumption of late-night shows actually happens online anyway, the candidate went on to say: “I’m still hopeful that we can have this interview on the air. So we’ll see what happens tonight.”

    Between Trump in Texas and Talarico in California, we certainly will.

    At the same time, with the wounds still fresh from Disney’s sudden sidelining of Kimmel for almost a week a year ago over affiliate fallout from a remark he made about the tragic assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, there is a tendency for some to get lost in the weeds of this. There is also a tendency for some to start shouting about equal-time rules without a read of the fine print.

    The equal time rule requires broadcasters that feature political candidates offer comparable airtime to rivals — if it is requested. Daytime and late-night talks shows have long operated under the assumption that they fell under an exemption for news and news interview programming. But in January, Carr issued guidance suggesting that such talk shows may not be free from the rule.

    The equal time rule also is often misunderstood. It applies to political candidates in a certain cycle. So, for instance, Ted Cruz’s appearance on The View this week makes no difference because he’s not up for reelection this midterm.

    Carr has argued that nothing is preventing late-night or daytime talk shows from featuring a political candidate as a guest. They just have to be prepared to offer time to rivals as well.

    As ABC pushes back on Carr’s investigation of The View, the network’s argument is one of selective enforcement as the FCC chairman has not singled out other broadcasters, like conservative talk radio. The network has also pointed to a 2002 letter from the FCC confirming the show’s exemption from the equal time rule. The network also has characterized the equal time rule as unworkable, given that its stations may be on the hook not just for major party candidates but also third-party rivals.

    Again, let’s see what happens tonight.

    Worth noting that when the now axed Colbert’s interview with Talarico was shifted over to YouTube, it got a huge number of views and the candidate raised more than $2.5 million in just over 24 hours. That might be history worth repeating itself for the Texas Democrat, false narrative or not.

  • Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    Jimmy Kimmel “Play-Acting” Over James Talarico Interview & FCC Threats, White House Claims

    In the latest twist in the Jimmy Kimmel–James Talarico interview drama, the White House is now accusing the ABC late-night host and his network of spinning a fake tale of federal strong-arming.

    Put another way, Team Trump insists there was never pressure put on Kimmel and ABC from the Trump administration to scuttle an interview with the poll-topping Texas Democrat and Senate hopeful.

    “Jimmy Kimmel is play-acting — as he often does — to create a false narrative about this administration’s policies,” Assistant White House Press Secretary Davis Ingle said Thursday.

    “Chairman Carr has not threatened him regarding interviewing James Talarico, or any other candidate.,” Ingle added of Carr, the FCC chairman, just before the second night of Donald Trump‘s GOP midterm convention aka pageant reconvenes. “Any media outlet blindly amplifying Kimmel’s egocentric delusion should insist on proof. Of which they will find none.”

    ABC parent company Disney had no comment on the response from the White House when contacted by Deadline. The lack of response is unsurprising given that the company is the midst of an escalating legal and regulatory First Amendment clash with the FCC over station license renewals and charges of political thumbs on the scale.

    Jimmy Kimmel

    ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!‘

    ABC/YouTube

    Wednesday’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! monologue had some distinct déjà vu of what Stephen Colbert went through on CBS last year with Talarico, who is looking to flip the Lone Star state for the Dems for the first time in decades. The L.A.-based Kimmel revealed that an on-air sit-down with Talarico would not air on ABC tonight.

    After naming off various political candidates including Trump, who Kimmel has talked to over the years, the Live! host put federal regulatory enforcement under the spotlight. “[The] FCC has threatened me, threatened our show, threatened our network, ABC, our affiliates, our local stations, based on simple, traditional editorial decisions,” Kimmel said. “Guest bookings, it would seem, they don’t like.”

    “And so, out of consideration for our local stations, especially our ABC affiliates in Texas who would have to deal with this nonsense, my interview tomorrow with James Talarico will not air on television,” he stated. “It will be posted on YouTube instead.”

    James Talarico

    James Talarico

    Brandon Bell/Getty Images

    Interestingly, Talarico, who is in Los Angeles today and Friday for a series of deep-pocket Hollywood fundraisers, was not officially listed as a guest on Kimmel before the host made his announcement. In a separate interview with MS NOW’s Symone Sanders Townsend today on The Weeknight, Talarico called the Kimmel situation the “most dangerous form of cancel culture.” With the knowledge that much of the consumption of late-night shows actually happens online anyway, the candidate went on to say: “I’m still hopeful that we can have this interview on the air. So we’ll see what happens tonight.”

    Between Trump in Texas and Talarico in California, we certainly will.

    At the same time, with the wounds still fresh from Disney’s sudden sidelining of Kimmel for almost a week a year ago over affiliate fallout from a remark he made about the tragic assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, there is a tendency for some to get lost in the weeds of this. There is also a tendency for some to start shouting about equal-time rules without a read of the fine print.

    The equal time rule requires broadcasters that feature political candidates offer comparable airtime to rivals — if it is requested. Daytime and late-night talks shows have long operated under the assumption that they fell under an exemption for news and news interview programming. But in January, Carr issued guidance suggesting that such talk shows may not be free from the rule.

    The equal time rule also is often misunderstood. It applies to political candidates in a certain cycle. So, for instance, Ted Cruz’s appearance on The View this week makes no difference because he’s not up for reelection this midterm.

    Carr has argued that nothing is preventing late-night or daytime talk shows from featuring a political candidate as a guest. They just have to be prepared to offer time to rivals as well.

    As ABC pushes back on Carr’s investigation of The View, the network’s argument is one of selective enforcement as the FCC chairman has not singled out other broadcasters, like conservative talk radio. The network has also pointed to a 2002 letter from the FCC confirming the show’s exemption from the equal time rule. The network also has characterized the equal time rule as unworkable, given that its stations may be on the hook not just for major party candidates but also third-party rivals.

    Again, let’s see what happens tonight.

    Worth noting that when the now axed Colbert’s interview with Talarico was shifted over to YouTube, it got a huge number of views and the candidate raised more than $2.5 million in just over 24 hours. That might be history worth repeating itself for the Texas Democrat, false narrative or not.