Blog

  • Crypto Market Review: Bitcoin (BTC) Not Giving up on $80,000, Ethereum (ETH) Has Golden Cross Potential, Is XRP at Risk of Losing $1.50 for Good?

    Crypto Market Review: Bitcoin (BTC) Not Giving up on $80,000, Ethereum (ETH) Has Golden Cross Potential, Is XRP at Risk of Losing $1.50 for Good?

    As the asset struggles to sustain momentum above the $1.50 mark, $XRP is once again nearing a turning point in its current market cycle. The wider technical structure indicates that this support zone may soon be lost, possibly forcing the asset into a longer period of consolidation below this threshold, despite the price’s recent attempt at a modest rebound.

    Lack of conviction around $XRP

    $XRP has been stuck in a steady decline over the last few months, marked by lower highs and waning momentum. The dominance of sellers on the market has been reinforced by key moving averages that have capped every recovery attempt.

    Although buyers have recently succeeded in raising the price from local lows close to the $1.30 area, the recovery is still precarious and technically unfinished.

    Article image

    The $1.50 level, which has served as a short-term pivot point during recent trading sessions, is at the center of the current struggle. The price has not developed significant momentum above this zone, even though the market briefly reclaimed it.

    The absence of consistent buying pressure raises the possibility that the market is not yet prepared to restore this level as solid support.

    $XRP may soon test, and possibly lose, the 50 EMA once more if it is unable to sustain its recent recovery structure. The short-term outlook would be seriously weakened by such a development.

    A verified rejection at the 50 EMA would probably strengthen the general negative trend and raise the likelihood that $XRP will fall below $1.50 once more. If this occurs, the level may move from short-term support into a far-off resistance zone that might take some time to recover.

    Technically speaking, losing $1.50 would represent a significant structural and psychological setback. Long-term consolidation is frequently necessary for markets to recover lost levels, especially when broader trend indicators are still negative.

    Ethereum’s potential

    A potential golden cross between the 26-day and 50-day exponential moving averages (EMAs) is a significant technical event that traders frequently keep a close eye on for Ethereum (ETH). Even though there has been persistent bearish pressure on the market for a number of months, recent price action indicates that momentum may be gradually changing.

    Ethereum has recently started to form a recovery structure following a steep decline earlier this year that drove the price below several significant support levels. The asset is currently trading in the $2,200-$2,300 range after rising from lows close to the $2,000 area. Shorter-term moving averages have begun to converge as a result of this rebound, raising the prospect of a technical crossover.

    Article image

    When a shorter-term moving average crosses above a longer-term one, it is known as a golden cross and indicates that recent price momentum is strengthening in relation to the overall trend. The 26-day EMA for Ethereum is rising and getting closer to the 50-day EMA, which has been serving as dynamic resistance during the current decline.

    A change in short-term momentum, and the possibility that buyers are taking back control of the market, would be indicated if the 26 EMA were to successfully cross above the 50 EMA. Technical traders frequently take notice of such a crossover because it implies that recent price increases are significant enough to change the market’s trend structure.

    A sustained rally is not, however, assured by a golden cross alone. Above the current price, Ethereum still faces a number of significant resistance levels. Higher moving averages, such as the 100-day and 200-day EMAs — which are still sloping downward and reflect the general bearish trend that has dominated the market in recent months — are still below the asset.

    Ethereum would probably need to sustain its upward momentum and recover adjacent resistance zones in order for the potential golden cross to have a significant effect. Confirming that the crossover represents true market strength rather than a transient bounce would require strong volume and ongoing buying pressure.

    Bitcoin loses momentum

    As the market steadies following a steep decline earlier this year, Bitcoin is once again trying to regain momentum. Recent price action indicates that Bitcoin is not giving up on its attempt to return to the $80,000 range, even though the overall trend is still cautious.

    The asset is currently constructing a short-term recovery structure that maintains the potential to test higher resistance levels after demonstrating resilience close to its recent lows.

    Bitcoin saw a large sell-off that drove the price down toward the $65,000-$70,000 range after declining from levels above $95,000 during the previous cycle phase. Buyers started to intervene after that decline created a brief bottom, slowing the downward trend and laying the groundwork for a possible recovery.

    $70,000 is a magnet

    Bitcoin has been steadily returning to the mid-$70,000 range in recent sessions. Improved short-term momentum and a series of higher lows that point to increasing buying pressure have helped to support this recovery.

    According to the current structure, traders are trying to regain their confidence following the previous decline.

    The next significant technical and psychological turning point is currently the $80,000 level. In addition to potentially reopening the path toward higher price zones seen earlier in the cycle, regaining that level would be a significant step toward regaining bullish momentum.

    Bitcoin has a number of challenges to overcome: the asset stays below important moving averages, such as medium-term trend indicators that frequently serve as resistance during recovery phases, that are still sloping downward. If buying pressure wanes, these levels might slow the current rally.

  • XRP Price Projections Soar To $15-$30 On CLARITY Act Prospects And Bank Adoption

    The $XRP price slid 5% on Wednesday as a wider market pullback dragged most major tokens lower, knocking the altcoin back to roughly $1.43. Experts point to the same recurring forces behind the swing: persistent geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and a shortage of fresh, bullish catalysts.

    Despite the near-term weakness, market observers remain upbeat about $XRP’s longer-term prospects, centering their optimism on an anticipated policy development in Washington.

    Potential Surge In Adoption And ETF Inflows

    Industry analysts widely believe that passage of the CLARITY Act — the proposed crypto market-structure bill in the US Congress — would materially improve $XRP’s institutional outlook by formally classifying the token as a digital commodity.

    That legal status would place $XRP on a regulatory footing similar to Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) and, according to proponents, remove a major barrier to large-scale adoption by banks, asset managers, and payment providers.

    BINANCE:XRPUSDT Chart Image by ronaldomarquez998

    In a new analysis, Sam Daodu of 24/7 Wall St. argued that the CLARITY Act is the single most important catalyst that could propel the $XRP price past key resistance levels.

    He noted that commodity designation would allow US banks to use $XRP for cross-border settlement via Ripple’s payment rails without the looming uncertainty that a regulatory reclassification might later introduce.

    That legal clarity, Daodu said, would unlock institutional confidence and encourage sizeable inflows into $XRP investment products such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

    $XRP Price Targets Lifted

    Daodu also cited forecasts from Standard Chartered’s Geoffrey Kendrick, who previously set an $8 target for $XRP in 2026, premised on the passage of the CLARITY Act. Kendrick’s model anticipates $4 billion to $8 billion in cumulative ETF inflows by year-end if the bill passes.

    Consensus among many analysts places the $XRP price between $5 and $10 should the legislation clear Congress, with an $8 price implying a market capitalization near $490 billion — a level Daodu argues is plausible if banks adopt $XRP for actual payment use rather than the token remaining a retail trading vehicle.

    Daodu went further in outlining further upside scenarios: if the CLARITY Act were approved and Ripple’s application for a master account at the Federal Reserve were also successful by late 2026, some models project $XRP could trade in a $15–$30 range under full bank adoption.

    The CLARITY Act passed the House in July 2025 by a 294–134 vote and moved through the Senate Agriculture Committee on January 29. However, the Senate Banking Committee has yet to schedule a new markup since January, and negotiators have not published a reconciled draft that satisfies both crypto and banking stakeholders.

    However, on Wednesday, pro-crypto Senator Cynthia Lummis indicated renewed momentum when she said that the Banking Committee plans to mark up the bill in April, following the Easter recess.

    Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

  • NCAA Women’s March Madness 2026: Where to Watch College Basketball Tournament Games Online

    If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, The Hollywood Reporter may receive an affiliate commission.

    Women’s March Madness returns for the 2026 NCAA tournament, and the undefeated UConn Huskies are looking to run it back as champions for a second season in a row — but not without some tough competition from UCLA, Texas and 2024 national champions South Carolina.

    Ahead of the First Round, commencing on Friday, March 20, fans can catch the First Four — Nebraska vs. Richmond, Missouri State vs. SFA, Southern U. vs. Samford and Virginia vs. Arizona State — on March 18 and 19. And since the First Four air on ESPN2, cord-cutters can watch live on any streaming service that carries the network, including DirecTV (with a five-day free trial), Fubo (with a five-day free trial), Sling and Hulu + Live TV.

    In addition to ESPN2, the Women’s March Madness tournament will be broadcast across ESPN, ESPNU, ESPNews and ABC. While the easiest way to catch every game is through DirecTV (with a five-day free trial), The Hollywood Reporter is further outlining each option ahead, including the best streaming deals and which channels are included in which packages.

    At a Glance: How to Watch 2026 NCAA Women’s March Madness Online

    How to Watch Women’s March Madness 2026: NCAA Livestream Without Cable

    Women’s March Madness games air across ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNews and ABC, which can be streamed live on any TV streaming service that carries those networks, including DirecTV (with a five-day free trial), Fubo (with a five-day free trial), Sling and Hulu + Live TV.

    Below, THR is breaking down which streaming packages are needed to access each of the five key channels, along with any free trials and subscription deals. To find more detailed channel and timing info for individual games, see here for the 2026 Women’s March Madness schedule.

    Five-day free trial; packages from $19.99 per month

    ESPN, ESPN2 and ABC are included in any of DirecTV’s signature packages: Entertainment, Choice, Ultimate and Premiere. ESPNU and ESPNews are included in every signature package except for Entertainment (Choice, Ultimate and Premiere).

    For avid sports fans, DirecTV’s MySports Genre Pack offers 20+ sports and broadcast networks (ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNews and ABC included), plus an ESPN Unlimited subscription. Regularly $64.99 per month, DirecTV’s current promotion offers the first two months of MySports for $44.99 per month, following its five-day free trial across all packages.

    Learn more about each plan option, including how to build your own channel lineup (starting at just $19.99 per month), at directv.com.

    Fubo

    Five-day free trial; packages from $55.99 per month ($45.99 for first month)

    A subscription to Fubo, which offers a five-day free trial for new subscribers, similarly offers access to ABC, ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU and ESPNews, along with ESPN Unlimited, all included in the Fubo Sports + News package. After the free trial period, the Sports + News package is $45.99 for the first month and $55.99 monthly afterward. While this plan includes 29 channels, Fubo offers other packages with a larger selection (better intended for non-sports fans).

    For the best of both worlds, opt for the Fubo Pro plan, which includes 200+ channels across sports, family, news and so on. Following the free trial period, the Pro package is $48.99 for the first month and $73.99 per month thereafter. Compare these packages and more at Fubo.tv.

    Half off first month for select plans

    For sports fans, Sling offers one of the widest variety of plan options, all listed here. The Orange + Sports Extra is a solid option for college basketball fans as it includes ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNews, ABC local and more. This bundle rings up at $56.99: $45.99 for Orange, plus $11 for Sports Extra.

    Also, unique to Sling is the option of a 1-Day Pass, 3-Day Pass or 7-Day pass for the Sling Orange plan, which includes ESPN and ESPN2. Compare Sling’s sports packages at Sling.com/Sports.

    Three-day free trial; packages from $89.99 per month

    Watch ABC, ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU and ESPNews with a subscription to Hulu + Live TV, which comes bundled with Disney+ and ESPN+. Following the three-day trial period, plans start at $89.99 per month.

    NCAA Women’s March Madness 2026 Schedule, Dates

    • Selection Sunday: March 15
    • First Four: March 18-19
    • First Round: March 20-21
    • Second Round: March 22-23
    • Sweet 16: March 27-28
    • Elite Eight: March 29-30
    • Final Four: April 3
    • NCAA championship game: April 5

    Related: NCAA Men’s March Madness 2026: Where to Watch College Basketball Tournament Games Live Online

  • Filmart: French Editor Matthieu Laclau Talks China Industry Changes, Looming Shadow of AI

    Filmart: French Editor Matthieu Laclau Talks China Industry Changes, Looming Shadow of AI

    The Chinese entertainment industry has been out in force across Filmart this week, with major companies such as CMC Pictures and the various provincial governments including the sprawling metropolis of Shanghai looking to pitch their locations to the film world.

    About two decades ago, French film editor Matthieu Laclau was going in the opposite direction. Laclau, fresh from film school in Paris and looking for work, was told by one veteran cinematographer that he had “no chance to work in the film industry” so he decided to expand his horizons and head east.

    As luck would have it, the move to Beijing was quickly followed by a call, virtually out of the blue, to come work with auteur Jia Zhangke on what would become A Touch of Sin (2013), winner of Cannes’ best screenplay award. “He was a hero of mine so of course I said yes, instantly,” Laclau says.

    In the years since, the prolific Laclau has worked with a veritable who’s who of the Chinese-language arthouse scene, including Zihan Geng, Wei Shujun, Kok Rui Lau, Shangjun Cai, Xue Bai, Yang Zhang and Midi Z. His work, as well as his position as one of the few foreigners to successfully integrate and enjoy a long successful career in the Chinese film industry, has given him a unique insight into how the market for these smaller productions has developed.

    This past week saw the Taiwan-based filmmaker travel to Hong Kong for the Asian Film Awards where he gave a talk with fellow editor David Richardson (Drug War) about his work. On the eve of Filmart, The Hollywood Reporter spoke to Laclau about his life in China and the state of the industry in the world’s second biggest movie market.

    You’re closing in on 20 years in Asia. What are some of the changes you’ve seen, especially in Chinese-language cinema?

    It’s very fascinating when you go to China, you talk with these directors or producers and they keep saying, ‘Oh, it’s changing so fast. It’s changing so fast. Always changing.’ And it’s true the audience is changing, maybe the taste is changing. But for me, as an editor, honestly, making a film is still the same process. I think it’s still a bit the same process as it was 100 years ago, just that there is maybe more technology involved. But technology is just a tool. The process of telling the story, finding the film language of the film, caring about the characters, understanding the characters — when it comes to those things there is not a lot of change.

    AI is a huge topic at this year’s Filmart. What’s your take on its rise?

    Well I’m sure with filmmaking that AI will be very smart when it comes to understanding or telling you what’s missing, in providing basic information. It’s so convenient, of course. I’m sure it will be convenient for me because in five minutes I can get an answer. I don’t need to ask someone to come here and watch my work for two hours and then maybe this person has only one person’s point of view, or might miss something. So I’m sure that it can be a useful tool. But the danger is now you’re going to start to ask things like ‘When do you think that the audience is going to cry?’ or ‘When is in this film will the audience become emotional?’ And if filmmakers start changing things on that advice, then we start heading into dangerous territory.

    How “global” has the making of movies become and are there opportunities in Asia, as there were when you first arrived?

    I think the rise in co-productions is making some impact and that this is a good thing. In Europe, you know, it has always been like this for many, many years — you do a European co-production with Germany, with Belgium, with the Netherlands, with whatever countries. They combine the story together and everyone can find their own money and then they can reach their own market. So you can have a bigger budget to make the same film. I think this is happening a lot more in Asia now.  Some of the director’s I work with are following that path, and I think that’s good. In China we are seeing more of a mix of genres, and again that is good. Genre filmmaking has developed, films that are sometimes dark but include heartfelt humor, and maybe even the director’s view of the world. So there are definitely things to get excited about.

  • Kevin Hart ‘demands a redo’ after unveiling of new wax figure

    Kevin Hart ‘demands a redo’ after unveiling of new wax figure

    Kevin Hart and his fans are asking “who in the f–k is this” after the unveiling of a new wax figure at a Tennessee wax museum.

    The five-time Emmy nominee, 46, on Saturday shared a close-up video of the Hollywood Wax Museum’s “attack,” to the tune of the “Curb Your Enthusiasm” theme song.

    “WTTTTFFFFF …. What did I do to these people….. This is an attack….. Who in the f–k is this?????? At this point these museums are just trying to make me cry,” Hart said, followed by a pouting emoji and several crying laughing ones. “This s–t has to stop…. I demand a redo damn it!!!!!!!!”

    “You asked for Kevin Hart and got Kevin The Weeknd,” commented Dave Ogleton, also known as FitDad.

    “Jersey Shore” star Jenni “JWOWW” Farley predicted that Hart’s frequent collaborator, Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson “had something to do with this.”

    One user said the figure is “temu af,” referring to the discounted online marketplace.

    Another joked Hart should “sue them for defamation of character. Immediately.”

    People reports that 53-year-old Johnson found the rendition “perfect” and told Hart: “Don’t change a thing.”

    Among the most notorious of wax figure blunders in semi-recent memory was one of Beyoncé, which Madame Tussauds New York had to briefly remove in 2017, amid critiques the figure more resembled Britney Spears and Kaley Cuoco than the Grammy-winning “Cowboy Carter” superstar.

  • Citi Downgrades Crypto Exchange Gemini After Cutting Bitcoin, Ethereum Price Targets

    Citi Downgrades Crypto Exchange Gemini After Cutting Bitcoin, Ethereum Price Targets

    In brief

    • Citi downgraded Gemini from Neutral to Sell, saying it’ll be years before the exchange achieves profitability.
    • GEMI stock was recently down more than 16% on the day, outpacing other major crypto stock losses.
    • The bank also cut its Bitcoin and Ethereum price targets this week.

    Crypto exchange and custodian Gemini’s stock dropped more than 16% after Citigroup analysts downgraded the company Wednesday morning, suggesting that it’ll be years before the firm is profitable.

    The company, which trades on the Nasdaq under the GEMI symbol, saw its rating fall from Neutral to Sell, and Citi lowered its price target from $13 to $5.50, according to a note published Wednesday morning. At the time of writing, GEMI was changing hands for $5.95 per share after having dropped more than 16% since markets opened.

    Gemini was founded in 2014 by Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss and went live the following year. The firm was initially focused on Bitcoin trading, before it expanded to offer a broader suite of crypto products and services. Now the platform caters to both retail and institutional clients with its spot trading, derivatives, staking, institutional-grade custody, an over-the-counter desk, a stablecoin, and a crypto rewards credit card.

    The company went public on the Nasdaq Global Select Market last September, pricing its IPO at $28 per share and raising $425 million—valuing Gemini at roughly $3.3 billion. Capital.com The Winklevoss twins had considered going public as early as 2021, around the time of Coinbase’s debut, but delayed those plans amid the 2022–23 crypto downturn and regulatory uncertainty.

    Wednesday’s Citi downgrade puts the stock well below that offering price.

    The company is scheduled to release its fourth quarter and full-year 2025 report on Thursday, followed by a conference call to discuss the results before the bell on Friday.

    The company has been taking steps to cut costs. In early February, the firm said it had approved a plan to exit and wind down operations in the U.K., European Union, and other European jurisdictions, and Australia, “as part of a broader initiative to reduce operating expenses and support the company’s path to profitability.”

    The wind down gave users in those regions two months to withdraw funds before their accounts are forced to close on April 6. At the same time, Gemini slashed its head count by 25% and said it would lean more on AI to drive efficiency gains.

    “We expect this will help reduce our total expenses in line with our headcount reduction and meaningfully accelerate our path to profitability even in the backdrop of the current crypto market,” the Winklevoss twins wrote in a joint blog post at the time. “Simplify, consolidate, then accelerate. Onward!”

    Citi also lowered its price targets for Bitcoin and Ethereum earlier this week, adjusting its 12-month forecast for BTC from $143,000 to $112,000 and for ETH from $4,304 to $3,175.

    Bitcoin was recently trading for about $71,250 with Ethereum priced at $2,175. Both were down Wednesday following worse-than-expected U.S. inflation data and growing investor concerns over the ongoing conflict in Iran.

    Citi strategist Alex Saunders wrote that while previously regulatory developments helped foster greater adoption and inflows, the opportunity for significant U.S. legislative action this year is diminishing.

    The upcoming midterm elections in November could complicate the legislative landscape for crypto-focused regulation.

    The odds for the crypto market structure bill, or CLARITY Act, could shift dramatically if Democrats gain additional seats in Congress. The bill can’t advance without support from at least seven Senate Democrats.

    Despite the falling price and bearish perspective from analysts, users on Myriad—a prediction market platform operated by Decrypt‘s parent company, Dastan—remained slightly bullish on Bitcoin’s near-term prospects, penciling in a nearly 55% chance that the coin’s next stop will be rising to $84,000 rather than falling to $55,000.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Stripe-Backed Tempo Network Launches With Focus on AI Agent Payments

    Stripe-Backed Tempo Network Launches With Focus on AI Agent Payments

    In brief

    • Tempo, incubated by crypto VC Paradigm and private payments firm Stripe, launched its mainnet on Wednesday.
    • The network is purpose-built for payments, but also launched a new open standard focused on transactions for AI agents.
    • The standard, Machine Payments Protocol, has already been bolstered by Visa and others.

    Tempo, the payments-focused layer-1 blockchain from Stripe and Paradigm, launched its mainnet on Wednesday, providing key infrastructure for the agentic economy in the process. 

    Alongside the network’s launch, Tempo unveiled a new open standard for agentic payments—the Machine Payments Protocol (MPP). The protocol, co-authored by Stripe and the Tempo team, circumvents the “limitations of existing payment rails,” allowing agents to transact seamlessly. 

    “MPP provides a standard way for agents and services to coordinate payments programmatically,” the network wrote. “Instead of each service inventing its own billing flow, MPP defines a simple protocol for requesting, authorizing, and settling payments between machines.” 

    The open standard has already been enhanced by a pair of the network’s early launch partners, including global payments giant Visa, which extended MPP to support card-based payments, and Lightspark, which did so for Bitcoin payments on the Lightning Network. Stripe too added on functionality, creating support for “cards, wallets, and other payment methods.” 

    “MPP lets an agent pay for services autonomously: An agent can request a resource from a service, and the service responds with a payment request,” the announcement reads. “The agent then authorizes payment from its wallet, the transaction settles instantly, and the service delivers the requested resource to the agent.”

    According to the network, the functionality is possible thanks to its introduction of “sessions,” which allows for a stream of payments to be made programmatically based on existing, defined limits. The network has already released a directory of compatible services with which agents can interact with and pay for, including those from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. 

    In addition to its agentic enhancements, Tempo says it “architected the infrastructure” to combat traditional, arcane solutions related to global payments, cross-border remittances, and more. 

    The network’s focus on the agentic economy amplifies a crescendoing trend among blockchain companies. In September, the Ethereum Foundation created its own artificial intelligence team, signaling the importance of the technology and its potential interplay with blockchain and cryptocurrencies. 

    The foundation’s initial focus was on ERC-8004, an Ethereum Improvement Proposal that similarly enables agents to transact seamlessly across the Ethereum blockchain. It also backed an open-source protocol from Google that tackles the same issue. Crypto exchange Coinbase has also been focused on enabling agentic payments, launching a wallet with built-in guardrails in February.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Bravo Hits Pause on ‘The Real Housewives of Miami’ Amid Low Ratings

    Bravo Hits Pause on ‘The Real Housewives of Miami’ Amid Low Ratings

    After weeks of worried murmurs in the Bravosphere about the status of “The Real Housewives Miami,” a source confirms to Variety that Bravo has indeed hit pause on the show, which concluded its seventh season in October. The show, though beloved among devoted Bravo fans, is the least-watched entry among the network’s “The Real Housewives” series.

    It’s not the first time “RHOM” has undergone a reset. In October 2021, Bravo’s parent company NBCUniversal announced that “The Real Housewives of Miami” would be returning to television as a Peacock original, more than eight years after its third season concluded in 2013. After Season 3 on Bravo, “RHOM” was shelved, but it was never canceled, and the show returned with a mixture of original cast members — Larsa Pippen, Alexia Echevarria, Lisa Hochstein, Adriana de Moura and Marysol Patton — and new ones.

    Seasons 6 and 7 then ran on Bravo, but despite the quality of the show, it’s never been among the highest-rated of Bravo’s “Real Housewives” offerings. Season 7 wasn’t its strongest installment, and before Bravo paused the show, several cast members were thought to be on the chopping block after having had difficult seasons. Nevertheless, even Season 7 bestowed viewers with many gifts, such as de Moura accusing her former BFF (and possible lover?) Julia Lemigova of having an affair with “a Haitian Mortician” during one of the reunion episodes. Immediately iconic.

    “The Real Housewives of Miami” has featured a mostly Latina cast, as well as Bravo’s first out, full-time LGBTQ cast member in Lemigova, who is married to tennis superstar Martina Navratilova.

    The show is produced by Purveyors of Pop. Matt Anderson, Nate Green, Cooper Green, Maty Buss, Bill Fritz, James Brangert and Andy Cohen executive produce.   

  • ‘Invincible’ Bosses Explain Those Young Nolan Flashbacks and Eve’s Big Reveal in Season 4 Premiere: ‘That’s Going to Be Heightening Things Moving Forward’

    ‘Invincible’ Bosses Explain Those Young Nolan Flashbacks and Eve’s Big Reveal in Season 4 Premiere: ‘That’s Going to Be Heightening Things Moving Forward’

    SPOILER ALERT: This article contains spoilers for the Season 4 premiere of “Invincible,” now streaming on Prime Video.

    The “Invincible” Season 4 premiere did something that the show, and Robert Kirkman‘s original superhero comic book series, has never done before: show fans the early days of Nolan (J.K. Simmons), and how his alien planet Viltrum was nearly wiped out by a virus.

    Episode 1 of the three-part premiere included a brief flashback of Nolan starting out as Omni-Man at his first costume fitting with Debbie (Sandra Oh), but Episode 2 ratcheted things up. It began with an extended look back at teenage Nolan teaching child Viltrumites the violent ways of their culture. Then, Nolan’s parents put his fighting skills to the test with a brutal beatdown, but things quickly take a turn as Viltrumites around the planet start coughing up blood. The race of powerful aliens becomes decimated by the Scourge Virus, which kills 99.9% of their world — except for Nolan, Grand Regent Thragg (Lee Pace) and a handful of others. In a chilling sequence, the survivors jettison the corpses to create rings around their planet. The rest of the episode goes back to present day, where Nolan, Allen (Seth Rogen), Telia (Tatiana Maslany) and their “Star Trek”-inspired crew search the galaxy for ways to kill the remaining Viltrumites.

    Back on Earth, Mark (Steven Yeun) faces off against new and old threats, including the talking T-Rex Dinosaurus (Matthew Rhys), Universa (Danai Gurira) and the alien Sequids. But Mark isn’t taking any more chances with the Sequids, and kills their leader, shocking his fellow heroes. That puts him in some hot water with Cecil (Walton Goggins), who’s also dealing with Conquest’s (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) escape from his underground bunker. There’s also another attack from the rapidly aging Flaxan aliens, but their assault is stopped Mark and the Guardians of the Globe. However, Monster Girl (Grey Griffin) and Rex/Robot (Zachary Quinto) go through a portal and get trapped in the Flaxans’ dimension.

    The biggest twist was saved for the end of Episode 3. With her powers not working, Eve (Gillian Jacobs) is searching for answers and takes a pregnancy test. It turns out she’s pregnant, but decides to not tell Mark yet. As the Viltrumite War looms ahead, it’s another major life moment for Mark and his growing family.

    In an interview with Variety, co-showrunners Robert Kirkman and Simon Racioppa break down the Season 4 premiere, those brand-new flashbacks and what Eve’s pregnancy means for the show going forward.

    I want to start with the flashbacks in the premiere. The previous seasons didn’t have very many flashbacks, and neither did the comic. How did you decide to show this moment from Debbie and Nolan’s past together in Episode 1?

    Simon Racioppa: It was a desire to show that Nolan is not out of Debbie’s head. She was with him for over 20 years. Even now, it’s been a couple years since she’s seen him last, but that doesn’t just go away. She’s dating somebody else, but he’s still a huge part of her thoughts. He still has a presence in her life, even though he’s literally not there. She’s also reinterpreting things. Suddenly all these memories that you have, you’re like, “Oh, that’s what that was about.” It takes on a different light. So that’s what she’s going through, and it’s also setting up what’s coming up for her, too. It’s reminding the audience that Nolan is still part of her life and maybe setting up some expectations for what might be coming up later in the season.

    Robert Kirkman: It’s also nice when you get to a fourth season of a show to reveal to the audience, “You think you know these characters, there are more bits and pieces to their personality that we haven’t quite revealed to you yet.” There’s more of a sense of discovery this deep into the show.

    Racioppa: Everybody has different memories of a relationship. There are good memories and bad memories. Yeah, Nolan did some terrible things back in Season 1, but Debbie still has some good memories of life with him. There were lots of good moments. Otherwise she never would have been with him for 20 years.

    Episode 2 starts with another flashback to young Nolan’s life on Viltrum when the Scourge Virus breaks out. Where did the idea come from to show this extended sequence?

    Kirkman: There was some talk about making that the first episode and making our first episode the second. But, ultimately, we decided to make it land where it landed. It’s a very important episode. As we’re getting closer to the Viltrumite War, we wanted to make sure that the Viltrumites weren’t this unknown space tyrant force that you didn’t know anything about. We kept things very close to the vest over Seasons 1, 2 and 3 over exactly what was going on with them, and who they were as a people. To have this chunk of the episode that reveals so much of their backstory was really important. I have to hand it to Simon, who wrote that episode, there are really cool elements that are completely unique to the show that give you really great insight into the Viltrumites. As Alan says, you start to feel a little bit of sympathy for them for the first time ever. It puts us in a great place, moving into this war.

    Racioppa: We wanted to make sure that they came across as layered, complex and complicated, because they are half of Mark’s heritage. It plays a role in his thinking and who he is, from the start of the series all the way to the end. That wouldn’t resonate, or have the importance it needs to, if the Viltrumites were just bad space guys. They’re a full society. There are reasons for why they act the way they act, why they do the things they do. We wanted to — maybe not answer every question you have — but certainly illuminate them to a degree that you can start thinking, “So that’s why they’re here. That’s why they’re doing this. That’s why Nolan is who he is, and, by extension, maybe that’s why Mark is who he is as well.”

    How did you come up with the looks for Nolan and his parents? Young Nolan looks a lot like Mark, and his father resembles present-day Nolan.

    Kirkman: Those parallels were very deliberate, and that was something that was kind of baked in. You’re seeing Nolan at a time similar to where we saw Mark when the show started. This was Mark’s family dynamic and life; then this is Nolan’s family dynamic, how a Viltrumite grows up, how they’re taught. To a certain extent, you see the full life cycle of Viltrumite life in these little glimpses of how at varying ages they’re doing things. Hopefully it gives you a really clear picture as to why Nolan turned out the way he did. Showing what his society deems normal is very important, and it goes a long way to — not necessarily justify his actions — but making you more easily understand his actions.

    Racioppa: It’s all from the comics. We expand upon and open up the space between the panels. We thought it was important to take you there when the Scourge Virus happened to make you part of that as an audience member, versus having a character speak about it. This is nice thing about animation; in live-action maybe that would have had to be a conversation, unless your budget was extremely high. We’re able to go there and show it and actually have it happen on screen in real time, even as a flashback.

    Robert, when you were writing the comics, did you already have these ideas and storylines in mind? Or was this fully made for the show?

    Kirkman: Those actual aspects were fully made for the show. There are always notions of how Viltrumite life worked and various different things. I’m present in the writers’ room, and right there in the mix when we’re working these things out. I’m able to give my opinion of, like, “I kind of pictured it being like this.” There are some things that I had that didn’t necessarily work their way into the pages of the comic book, but I had them worked out behind the scenes. I’m able to flesh those things out with the writers. That was one of those moments where I never got around to showing this, but this is how I see things working. There are also a lot of things that I never considered when I was writing the comic book series. When we’re in the room, a question will be asked and it’s like, “Never thought about that! Hold on a second.” And in the moment I get to be like, “Well, you know, if this means this, and that means that, then I was thinking maybe this could be that.” It’s great to be able to put a fresh coat of paint on something that’s 20 years old, find a new nook and cranny that I’d never explored, flesh it out and feel like it’s as authentic as if it had shown up in the comic book 20 years ago.

    Racioppa: One of the best things about having Robert is that there are extra pages of the comic that only exist in his head that we get to pull out as we work on the show. Maybe didn’t make their way into the comic, but they’re there. Then we’re like, “Oh, that’s great. So that’s the backstory of that character. That’s awesome. Let’s put it in the show. Take that page out of your head and let’s put it in the script.”

    We learn a bit about this in the comics, but why did Nolan survive the Scourge Virus when it wiped out nearly all of the Viltrumites?

    Kirkman: It’s possible it may come up in the future. It’s certainly unknown for now. Viruses work in different ways; some people survive and some people don’t. It’s possible that there are more elements to that character that will be revealed as time goes on.

    Eve is revealed to be pregnant at the end of Episode 3. How is that going to raise the stakes for Marc once he finds out?

    Kirkman: You want to keep things as heightened as possible. We’re sending Mark out into space to fight a war. We want to give people the sense that there are still very important things happening on Earth, even if you may not see it. Leaving him with that tidbit, and to be the undercurrent of some unknowns as to what may be occurring, was really important to us. Having these characters deal with real-life things and relationships keep it as grounded as possible. It’s a big storyline that’s going to be heightening quite a bit of things for these characters moving forward.

    Racioppa: The world exists beyond Mark. There are other things that will happen around him. If he leaves for a while, Earth doesn’t stop and wait for him to return. Things are happening for other characters. Eve’s her own person. They’re in a relationship, but she has her own wants, desires, issues, triumphs that are going to happen whether Mark is there or not. So that’s important to us to make that feel real, and not just that everybody is serving Mark. Everybody has their own story and drama to go through.

    Also in Episode 3, Robot and Monster Girl disappear into the alien Flaxan world, which comic readers know is part of a major storyline up ahead. Will we see them again this season?

    Kirkman: You just have to watch the rest of the episodes. I will say that is a huge storyline that we’ll be setting up. Anyone who’s read the comics is very familiar with that. It would be insane if we were able to also fit that into Season 4. So we’ll have to see.

    This interview has been edited and condensed.

  • Type 2 Diabetes Risk Varies Widely in Young Adults. How GLP-1s Can Help

    Type 2 Diabetes Risk Varies Widely in Young Adults. How GLP-1s Can Help

    Female leaning against a blue wallShare on Pinterest
    New research highlights a need for earlier, more tailored interventions to prevent type 2 diabetes in young adults with prediabetes. Klaus Vedfelt/Getty Images
    • Researchers found that type 2 diabetes risk varies among adults ages 18 to 40.
    • Those with high fasting glucose, especially if they qualified for GLP-1 treatment, had higher risk.
    • These findings suggest that tailored interventions may be most beneficial.
    • Experts say it’s wise to have screening done since prediabetes may have no symptoms.
    • Steps like diet, exercise, good sleep, and stress reduction may help prevent type 2 diabetes.

    More than 115 million people in the United States have prediabetes, but an estimated 80% of this group may not be aware they have the condition.

    Now, a new study has revealed that the risk of developing type 2 diabetes among adults ages 18 to 40 with prediabetes varies widely.

    The findings show that young adults with high fasting glucose levels, especially those who meet criteria for treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) medications, face significantly higher risks of progressing to type 2 diabetes within five years.

    According to the researchers, these findings suggest the need for earlier, more tailored interventions to prevent the onset of type 2 diabetes and its serious complications, such as heart disease, kidney disease, and stroke. They note that this challenges the current one-size-fits-all approach to prevention.

    Diagnosing prediabetes and managing high blood sugar can prevent or delay the development of type 2 diabetes. Early treatment and lifestyle changes are crucial.

    The study analyzed data from 662 young adults ages 18 to 40 with prediabetes, who were followed for an average of 7 years.

    These individuals were drawn from three well-established U.S.-based cohorts: the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos, the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study, and the Framingham Heart Study Third Generation.

    The research team focused on fasting glucose levels to define prediabetes, specifically levels ranging from 100 to 125 mg/dL. However, hemoglobin A1c data, which measure average blood glucose over the past two to three months, were not available for this analysis.

    In addition to glucose measurements, investigators collected comprehensive health information, including body mass index (BMI), lipid profiles, and blood pressure readings, taken during study visits from 1985 to 2011, prior to the FDA approval of GLP-1RA medications for weight management.

    The researchers applied existing FDA criteria for prescribing GLP-1 drugs for weight loss, which include a BMI of 30 kg/m² or higher (obesity), or a BMI of 27 kg/m² or higher (overweight) combined with at least one weight-related health condition, such as high cholesterol or high blood pressure.

    Using these criteria, the team estimated the five-year risk of progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes. This risk stratification aimed to identify subgroups within the prediabetic population who might benefit from more intensive lifestyle interventions or pharmacologic treatment.

    The authors noted that the study’s design, while robust in terms of follow-up length and population diversity, was limited by the absence of hemoglobin A1c measurements and by the lack of GLP-1RA medications during participants’ follow-up period.

    Overall, the analysis found that the five-year risk of progressing from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes among young adults was 7.5%.

    However, this risk was not uniform across all participants. Those who met the eligibility criteria for GLP-1RA treatment due to obesity or overweight status plus a related condition exhibited a higher risk of 10.9%.

    The risk escalated further to 15.1% for individuals with fasting glucose levels at the higher end of the prediabetic range (110-125 mg/dL).

    Among those with both elevated fasting glucose and GLP-1RA treatment eligibility, the five-year risk of progressing to type 2 diabetes was nearly one in four (24.8%).

    These findings highlight significant variability in diabetes risk among young adults with prediabetes as well as the inadequacy of treating all patients with prediabetes in the same manner.

    According to Mary Rooney, PhD, MPH, the study’s lead author and an assistant research professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, identifying those at highest risk through blood tests and clinical risk factors could help guide early interventions, including lifestyle modifications and, where appropriate, drug therapy.

    The study also raises important considerations about the potential role of GLP-1RA medications.

    This class of diabetes and weight loss medications is not currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for diabetes prevention, even in high risk young adults with prediabetes with overweight or obesity.

    However, the researchers say the cost-effectiveness and long-term benefits of such an approach remain uncertain.

    Bryan Henry, FNP, PhD, president of PeterMD, who was not involved in the research, said that younger people should know that even if they feel well, it doesn’t mean they don’t have metabolic issues.

    “People with prediabetes can go years before they feel like something is wrong with them,” he said. “It’s common to feel good but have your body working poorly.”

    However, high fasting glucose levels can damage blood vessels, increase inflammation, and strain your pancreas.

    “From this study, we need to recognize that some metabolic changes occur without our signs, which is why it is so very important to regularly screen and become aware of this issue as soon as possible after we reach early adulthood,” explained Henry.

    “I often emphasize that metabolic health is dependent upon much more than just what we eat and how we exercise; it also depends on achieving an optimal hormonal balance.”

    Henry advised establishing regular sleep routines and practicing good stress-reducing behaviors to keep prediabetes from advancing to type 2 diabetes.

    Jamie Bovay, DPT, a physical therapist, strength and longevity coach, and owner of KinetikChain Denver, who wasn’t involved in the study, said that investing in muscle mass and metabolic flexibility can help support a healthy metabolism.

    “For young adults with prediabetes, focus on regular heavy resistance work to preserve and build muscle, consistent low intensity cardio (zone 2) to support fat burning, and one to two short higher-intensity sessions per week to maintain cardiovascular capacity,” Bovay told Healthline.

    “If you can focus on building strength, cardiovascular capacity, and consistency through lower intensity cardio, you can give your body the tools it needs to not only fight off diabetes, but live a healthy and long life as well,” he said.