Blog

  • Donald Trump Says Kennedy Center Will Close Immediately And No Renovations Will Take Place Unless His Name Is Restored To Facade

    Donald Trump Says Kennedy Center Will Close Immediately And No Renovations Will Take Place Unless His Name Is Restored To Facade

    UPDATED: President Donald Trump said Tuesday that the board of the Kennedy Center has voted to immediately close the main complex, while adding that no renovations would take place unless his name is restored to the institution.

    In a Truth Social post, Trump wrote, “The Board of The Kennedy Center today agreed, almost unanimously, to close the Building for Safety reasons, and so that it can begin the process of Reconstruction. The closing will take place immediately, however, the Renovation and Reconstruction, which is a very large and complex job, cannot begin until such time as the D.C. Circuit rules on the Board’s approved name. If the ruling is a negative one, which it should not be, and is not overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court, the Reconstruction and the Renovation of The Kennedy Center will not take place.”

    Congress appropriated more than $250 million for Kennedy Center renovations last year as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

    Trump also wrote that $17 million that he raised for the center is being put into the Kennedy Center account “to keep it afloat.”

    The board of the Kennedy Center was presented with a resolution to immediately close the main part of the arts complex, with officials citing repair needs and financial woes. The resolution outlined the structural needs of the center and a recent incident in which a piece of the ceiling collapsed amid heavy rains.

    Trump, who serves as the board’s chairman, initially announced the closure plan in February. The board is dominated by members appointed by the president.

    Major programming at the center largely ended in July, as the board had previously set that as the timeline to shutter the facility for two years for renovations, funding by a congressional appropriation of more than $250 million.

    But Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH), an ex officio member of the board, challenged the closure plan, and a federal judge last spring ruled that the center’s board had to more fully consider the impact of such an action before shuttering. In August, the board voted in favor of a plan to shut down the main complex but keep open The Reach, an extension that opened in 2019, for limited performances.

    Beatty also challenged the Kennedy Center board’s vote in December to add Trump’s name to the complex. The judge, Christopher Cooper, sided with her, ruling that only Congress could make such a change, and he ordered that Trump’s name be removed. Earlier on Tuesday, Cooper also nixed an alternative plan to add “Restored and Renovated by President Donald J. Trump” to the facade below “The John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts.” He also ruled that designating the grounds as Donald J. Trump Plaza violates congressional statute that the complex be a memorial to Kennedy.

    The center’s attorneys have argued that giving Trump such recognition is essential to raising money to bring the institution out of financial straits.

    In a draft resolution given to board members over the weekend, center officials said it was facing financial ruin, and the president had offered to “step in and raise the necessary funds to keep the Center from bankruptcy during its much needed renovation.” The resolution added that the board “is seeking to appropriately recognize and acknowledge President Trump for his well timed proffer of fiscal rescue. The Board understands that without such appropriate recognition it is unlikely that President Trump will provide the fundamental oversight of the renovation of the main building and lead the fiscal rescue of the Center.”

    The center, represented by the DOJ, is appealing Cooper’s decision. Trump wrote that they would seek an expedited appeal.

    Roma Daravi, vice president of public relations for the center, said in a statement, “The Board’s decision today reflects sound judgment and a clear prioritization of safety above all else. As the main building closes for urgent renovations — long overdue and desperately needed to protect the safety of patrons, artists and staff — the Center remains committed to pursuing a safe and efficient renovation through all legal means. We intend to appeal today’s Court ruling and move forward with recognizing Chairman President Trump’s historic contributions to the revitalization of America’s Cultural Center.”

    The center has cited extensive repair work needed, including replacement of soffit panels, water damage repair and new electrical infrastructure. According to the center, the slab that fell weighed more than 150 pounds.

    Beatty’s attorneys, Norm Eisen and Nathaniel Zelinsky, indicated that they would challenge the shutdown in court. They have pointed out that the judge’s injunction prohibiting the center’s closure remains in effect.

    They said in a statement, “The unlawful renaming drove audiences and artists away. Now the Board has voted to shut down yet again to hide the terrible mismanagement under its current leadership.”

    In a statement, Beatty said, “For years, the Kennedy Center has planned to undergo phased renovations, in which we both renovate and maintain some performances. This is how major performing arts centers in the country operate. But donors, patrons, and artists all fled after the unlawful attempt to rename this sacred memorial after Donald Trump. Donald Trump only cares about the Kennedy Center for his vanity. That is wrong and it is a breach of his fiduciary duty as a trustee. Congress established the Kennedy Center as a living memorial to President Kennedy, and I am proud to defend this cherished institution.”

    Another reaction came from Kennedy’s niece, Maria Shriver, who wrote on X, “That a sitting president would not let any renovations to a public building go on unless he gets to first put his name in the said building… What a sad state of affairs. What a tragedy. Actually, how small minded, how narcissistic. Actually great men, devoted to public service and the public good do not act like this.”

  • Did Trump, Vance skip 9/11 observance in Pennsylvania that was rescheduled so they could attend?

    Did Trump, Vance skip 9/11 observance in Pennsylvania that was rescheduled so they could attend?

    • The claim that the Flight 93 National Memorial changed the time of its 2026 9/11 observance to accommodate a visit from U.S. President Donald Trump or Vice President JD Vance but neither showed up is unproven. 
    • Though event pages for past Flight 93 National Memorial ceremonies showed the 2026 event started around an hour and 15 minutes earlier than in previous years, the 2026 program (archived) also was longer than previous years. Moreover, we found no evidence that Trump or Vance were supposed to attend the event at the memorial but failed to show.
    • Snopes will update this report if additional information surfaces. We have reached out to the National Park Service regarding the reason for an earlier start time in 2026 and the White House to find out whether Trump and/or Vance were supposed to attend, and are waiting for responses.

    After the U.S. commemorated the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a claim (archived) circulated online that the Flight 93 National Memorial changed the time of its 9/11 observance to accommodate a visit from U.S. President Donald Trump or Vice President JD Vance but neither showed up.

    United Airlines Flight 93 was one of four planes hijacked on 9/11. It was the only one that did not hit a building, instead crashing in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after passengers attempted to retake control of the plane from the hijackers.

    In sharing the claim about Trump and Vance, one X user wrote: “The 9/11 Flight 93 Memorial reportedly changed the time of their ceremony to accommodate a visit from Trump or Vance, but neither of them showed up. Trump traveled to a golf tournament instead.”

    The claim also circulated on Facebook (archived). Snopes readers contacted us about the claim.

    The claim is unproven. Though event pages for 9/11 observances at the Flight 93 National Memorial from 2020 to 2026 showed the 2026 event started around an hour and 15 minutes earlier than previous ceremonies, the program (archived) also was longer than in previous years. 

    We found no evidence that Trump or Vance were supposed to attend the event at the memorial but did not show. Trump attended a commemoration ceremony at the Pentagon with military leaders on Sept. 11, 2026, while Vance attended a commemoration event in New York City at the site of the former Twin Towers. Trump travelled to Dublin, Ireland, in the evening for a two-day visit that included attending the Irish Open at his Doonbeg golf club on Sept. 13.

    We contacted the National Park Service, which manages the Flight 93 National Memorial, to ask why the 2026 observance started earlier than in previous years. We also asked the White House press office whether Trump or Vance were supposed to attend the Flight 93 National Memorial observance and await replies to our queries.

    In the meantime, because the NPS had not confirmed why the 2026 event had a different start time than previous years, we leave this claim unrated.

    Longer 2026 event also memorialized other 9/11 flights

    According to event programs for the 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 events, previous 9/11 observances at the Flight 93 National Memorial started at either 9:45 or 9:50 a.m., which could be in order to coincide with the exact time Flight 93 crashed near Shanksville, at 10:03 a.m. Sept. 11, 2001. The 2026 event started at 8:30 a.m.

    The event programs from 2021 to 2024 generally started with welcome remarks, the Pledge of Allegiance or national anthem, followed by a reading of the names of the 40 passengers and crew on board Flight 93 who died when the plane crashed.

    The event programs then listed bells of remembrance, a moment of reflection and conclusion and a wreath-laying. Some events also featured speakers such as former President George W. Bush and then-Vice President Kamala Harris in 2021 and then-first lady Jill Biden in 2022. Trump attended a smaller, live-streamed ceremony during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.

    The 2026 program appeared longer than in previous years, and included remembrances for the three other hijacked flights on 9/11 that struck the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The 2026 program added musical selections and also included bell tollings and wreath-layings for American Airlines Flight 11, which hit the North Tower on 8:46 a.m., United Airlines Flight 175, which hit the South Tower at 9:03 a.m., and American Airlines Flight 77, which hit the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m. 

    If the 2026 event intended to honor the other three flights at the times they crashed, it would have needed to start earlier than the previous 9:45 or 9:50 a.m. start times.

    For further reading, Snopes has investigated a series of other rumors about where Trump was or what he was doing on or around Sept. 11, 2001.

    Sources

    9/11 Memorial Timeline. https://timeline.911memorial.org/timeline/10681. Accessed 15 Sept. 2026.

    BINKLEY, COLLIN, et al. Trump Commemorates the 25th Anniversary of the 9/11 Attacks at the Pentagon. 11 Sept. 2026, https://apnews.com/article/trump-sept-11-pentagon-2366fe3bb4948c068eaceb392ddbd948.

    Event Program – Flight 93 National Memorial (U.S. National Park Service). https://www.nps.gov/flni/planyourvisit/event-program.htm. Accessed 15 Sept. 2026.

    Flight 93 to Offer September 11 Ceremony Livestream – Flight 93 National Memorial (U.S. National Park Service). https://www.nps.gov/flni/learn/news/flight-93-to-offer-september-11-ceremony-livestream.htm. Accessed 15 Sept. 2026.

    Inside the Octagon – Defence Forces Control Hub for Trump. Aug. 2026. News. www.rte.ie, https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2026/0828/1589591-trump-ireland/.

    ‘Memorial Ceremony September 11, 2021 9:45 AM’. Flight 93 National Memorial, https://web.archive.org/web/20220802054740/https://www.nps.gov/flni/planyourvisit/event-program.htm.

    ‘Memorial Ceremony September 11, 2022 at 9:45 Am’. Flight 93 National Memorial, https://web.archive.org/web/20230524100005/https://www.nps.gov/flni/planyourvisit/event-program.htm.

    ‘Memorial Ceremony September 11, 2024 at 9:50 AM’. Flight 93 National Memorial Pennsylvania, https://web.archive.org/web/20240905163251/https://www.nps.gov/flni/planyourvisit/event-program.htm.

    ‘Memorial Ceremony September 11, 2025 at 9:45 AM’. Flight 93 National Memorial, https://web.archive.org/web/20250911050636/https://www.nps.gov/flni/planyourvisit/event-program.htm.

    Watch Live: Vance, Former Presidents Attend 9/11 Ceremony at Ground Zero. 11 Sept. 2026, https://thehill.com/video-clips/6083822-watch-live-vance-bush-clinton-obama-biden-ground-zero-nyc-911-memorial-25th-anniversary/.

    WATCH: Trump Presents Lowry with Irish Open Trophy. Sept. 2026. Sport. www.rte.ie, https://www.rte.ie/sport/golf/2026/0913/1591407-watch-trump-presents-lowry-with-irish-open-trophy/.
     

  • ‘60 Minutes’ Season Premiere Averages 7.94 Million Viewers, A Falloff From Last Year’s Debut

    ‘60 Minutes’ Season Premiere Averages 7.94 Million Viewers, A Falloff From Last Year’s Debut

    The season premiere of 60 Minutes averaged 7.94 million viewers Sunday, off from the more than 10 million who tuned in to last year’s debut.

    The first episode of the show’s 59th season was highly anticipated — and scrutinized — following the shakeup at the newsmagazine last spring, despite its status as one of the network’s top-rated programs.

    The season premiere was off by 21% compared to the September 28 debut last year, but there are some caveats to the figure, as tends to be the case during the NFL season.

    The broadcast was delayed in Eastern and Central time zones because of the Minnesota Vikings-Green Bay Packers game, and that football lead-in also was off by 21%, averaging 18.6 million viewers.

    CBS‘s NFL coverage also faced competition from football on Fox, and the final part of 60 Minutes went up against NBC’s telecast of the Dallas Cowboys-New York Giants game on Sunday Night Football. The first quarter hour of 60 Minutes averaged 9.4 million and dropped to 6.7 million in the final quarter hour. Networks also are pointing to changes in Nielsen’s methodology.

    In the adults 25-54 demo, 60 Minutes averaged 1.58 million viewers, down 33% from 2.36 million for last year’s premiere.

    CBS News said in a statement, “We are so proud of the exceptional journalism on display in our season premiere and we can’t wait to bring our audience another amazing show this coming Sunday.”

    Last spring, CBS News editor in chief Bari Weiss replaced executive producer Tanya Simon with Nick Bilton, and three correspondents including Sharyn Alfonsi, Cecilia Vega and Scott Pelley were fired. The season premiere featured some new graphics and the introduction of a new correspondent, Ross Douthat. Stories featured included an exclusive interview with an airman shot down and rescued from Iran, a report on brokers collecting huge sums to secure clients’ pardons from Donald Trump, and a profile of the Los Angeles Rams.

  • Did Chinese government warn people not to respond to aliens and call UN hotline instead?

    Did Chinese government warn people not to respond to aliens and call UN hotline instead?

    Claim:

    The Chinese government issued a nationwide alert telling people not to communicate with aliens and to contact the United Nations if extraterrestrial life reaches out to them.

    Rating:

    False

    Context

    In June 2026, numerous Chinese news media outlets reported on updated international guidelines advising researchers not to independently respond to extraterrestrial signals. English-language news outlets also reported on these updated guidelines, which came from an international scientific organization. It was not possible to find any evidence of the Chinese government sending a nationwide alert telling people not to communicate with aliens, nor of the existence of a U.N. “alien hotline.”

    In September 2026, a rumor circulated online that the Chinese government broadcast a warning to the country’s population of roughly 1.4 billion people, instructing them not to communicate with aliens and to instead contact the United Nations if extraterrestrial life reaches out to them.

    For example, one Instagram user posted a video making the claim (archived), during which the user said the alleged warning was distributed through several channels:

    Broadcast was made as if it were a giant emergency. They did it through the radio, they did it like the way that you get Amber Alerts on your phone, they did a television broadcast and they had messengers going into rural communities to tell people this and give them this information.

    The supposed announcement said, “If you are contacted by aliens, do not attempt to communicate with them. Call this phone number, which will send you to the United Nations desk of the alien communications specialist, and they will take care of it for you.” The Instagram user later referred to the supposed number as an “alien hotline” and said similar messages circulated in Japan and South Korea.

    The claim spread spread elsewhere on Instagram as well as on Reddit and Facebook. Readers also contacted Snopes to ask whether it was true.

    In short, it was not possible to find any evidence the Chinese government issued the nationwide warning described in the posts, and a spokesperson for China’s embassy in Washington, D.C., said no Chinese government agency issued such a warning. The real guidance behind the rumor also did not instruct ordinary people to call a U.N. “alien communications specialist” if extraterrestrials contacted them. As such, we have rated the claim as false.

    Warning did appear in Chinese media

    There is a real story behind the rumor. On June 1, 2026, the International Academy of Astronautics, a Paris-based nongovernmental scientific organization, published updated guidelines for people and organizations involved in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, or SETI. The document says possible signals should be independently verified and that researchers should not send a reply before international consultation.

    These guidelines did receive attention in China. For instance, on June 7, IT Home, a Chinese technology news website, published an article titled (translated using Google Translate) “Do not respond to aliens without authorization! The International Academy of Astronautics updates eight guidelines.” China Science Daily, Shanghai-based digital newspaper The Paper and national television broadcaster CCTV News also reported on the updated declaration.

    The article on The Paper’s website appeared in its “Government Affairs” section, which could make it seem like an official government message.

    English-language news media outlets similarly reported on the IAA’s updated guidelines.

    Graphic may explain how rumor spread

    A blue graphic with yellow text in Chinese circulated alongside the rumor in some social media posts. Jingchu Network (荆楚网) — which is part of CnHubei, a news website in Hubei province — posted the graphic on its Douyin account (shown below). The message, translated using Google Translate, reads:

    Do not reply to extraterrestrials on your own initiative; the International Academy of Astronautics recommends immediately notifying the United Nations upon the discovery of extraterrestrial life.

    (Jingchu Network Douyin account)

    The Douyin post cites Red Star News as its source and explains that the message concerned the IAA’s guidelines. On June 7, Red Star News published an article about the IAA update.

    Jingchu Network is a state-backed news outlet. According to its website, it is supervised by the Hubei Provincial Party Committee Propaganda Department and the Hubei Provincial Cyberspace Administration. “It is the only national key provincial news website in Hubei Province approved by the State Council Information Office,” the website reads.

    The graphic later circulated on English-language social media platforms, where users described it as an announcement posted in China. This may have contributed to claims that the Chinese government itself issued the warning.

    Government website also links to the story

    The story also indirectly appeared on at least one official Chinese government website.

    On June 10, Fushun Municipal Science and Technology Bureau — a government department of the city of Fushun, in Liaoning province — listed (as shown below) a webpage titled, “Do not respond to aliens without authorization! Why did the International Academy of Astronautics call for a halt?” in the “Science and Technology Work Updates” section of its website.

    (fskjj.fushun.gov.cn)

    However, that webpage originated from outside the department’s website. It was not presenting the message as a new government policy or warning.

    Liu Chang, a spokesperson for China’s embassy in Washington, D.C. said via email that the Chinese government issued no such warning:

    Based on publicly available information to my knowledge, no Chinese government agency issued such a warning, distributed it through national alert channels, or instructed the public to contact the U.N. about extraterrestrial contact.

    The claim may stem from confusion over a revised SETI protocol issued by the International Academy of Astronautics and reported by Chinese media. It was not a Chinese government notice.

    Snopes also contacted the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs for comment. We will update this article if we receive a response.

    Guidance is for researchers, not ordinary people

    The IAA document explicitly says it was written for people and organizations taking part in scientific SETI research. It does not tell ordinary people what to do if an alien personally contacts them.

    The declaration says that after a confirmed detection, researchers should take part in international consultations over whether a response should be sent. Until those talks are finished, “no reply should be sent.” It also says those discussions should include the United Nations and other international bodies.

    Chinese Science Daily interviewed Zhang Tongjie, a Beijing Normal University professor who took part in discussions about the revised declaration. He reportedly said the cautious approach was based on uncertainty about whether an extraterrestrial civilization would be friendly, hostile or neutral. He was also quoted as saying the declaration was not legally binding. 

    There is no UN ‘alien hotline’

    Social media posts also claimed Chinese citizens were given a phone number for a U.N. “alien communications specialist,” but no such a number is in the IAA declaration. The document directs questions about its principles to the IAA itself.

    Searching Google for a United Nations “alien communications specialist” returned no results (archived) suggesting that such a role exists.

    Though the declaration says consultations about whether to respond to confirmed extraterrestrial intelligence should involve the United Nations and other international bodies, it also says the specific procedures for such consultations still need to be established in a separate agreement or arrangement.

    The idea of an official U.N. representative for alien contact has appeared before. In 2010, a report in British newspaper The Times claimed astrophysicist Mazlan Othman, then-director of the U.N. Office for Outer Space Affairs, was appointed as Earth’s contact person for extraterrestrials. Othman denied this and said no specific U.N. response role had been decided, while further action would be up to member states.

    Therefore, the IAA declaration’s reference to international consultation through the United Nations does not mean there is a U.N. “alien hotline.”

    Snopes has contacted the U.N. and, specifically, its Office for Outer Space Affairs to ask whether such a hotline exists. We will update this article if we receive any responses.

    Bottom line

    All in all, there is a kernel of truth behind the story. In June 2026, Chinese news media outlets did publish messages saying people should not “respond to aliens” without authorization, and an official municipal government website did link to a webpage on the topic.

    However, that information came from guidelines for SETI researchers issued by the International Academy of Astronautics. The guidelines say a possible extraterrestrial signal should first be verified and that no response should be sent before international consultation.

    Finally, it was not possible to find any evidence that China sent a nationwide emergency alert or gave people a phone number for a U.N. “alien communications specialist.”

  • Is image of Trump kissing Natalie Harp on golf course real?

    Is image of Trump kissing Natalie Harp on golf course real?

    • The claim that an image shows U.S. President Donald Trump kissing White House aide Natalie Harp on a golf course remains under investigation. 
    • The rumor stems from two versions of the image shared on social media in mid-September 2026. The higher-resolution version had telltale signs of artificial intelligence, such as hands with too many fingers, as well as a watermark confirming it was created or edited using OpenAI’s generative AI tools. The lower-resolution image did not have an OpenAI watermark and was too blurry for telltale anomalies to be apparent.
    • The White House declined to provide Snopes with legitimate photos of Trump and Harp golfing that could be compared to the images shared online. A spokesperson said the image was “clearly a fake.”
    • Hany Farid, co-founder of deepfake detection company GetReal, told Snopes the higher-resolution image was AI-generated and was clearly derived from the lower-quality version. While he said the lower-resolution version’s quality itself was “a bit of a red flag,” he said he considered its authenticity inconclusive.  
    • Snopes will update this report if additional information surfaces.

    In summer 2026, many people scrutinized White House aide Natalie Harp following news reports of what appeared to be an unusually close relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump.

    In September, following a Trump visit to Ireland during which he took time to golf at his Trump Organization-owned course, people started sharing multiple versions of an image that appeared to show Trump kissing Harp, whose back is turned toward the camera, while on the golf course.

    For example, one X post (archived) shared a low-resolution version of the image. Another popular X post (archived) shared a higher resolution version with crisper colors.

    Users also widely posted the image on Threads (archived) and Instagram (archived). Snopes readers emailed us to ask whether the image was real.

    Snopes could find no credible evidence or source supporting the authenticity of the image, but we were able to find multiple red flags indicating the higher-resolution version was generated or edited with artificial intelligence tools. The lower-resolution version did not have those same red flags, in part because of its poor quality. Therefore, we’ve left this claim unrated until more evidence comes to light.

    We used Google Lens to run a reverse image search on both versions of the image. The oldest example that turned up was a thumbnail image for a Sept. 14 YouTube video uploaded by political commentator Keith Edwards. We’ve fact-checked images originating from Edwards’ thumbnails twice before. In one of those fact checks, Edwards confirmed he had used an AI tool to generate the image.

    Snopes reached out to Edwards by email to confirm the origin of the image of Trump kissing Harp. He responded: 

    My thumbnail team found the image online. We did not create or alter the underlying image, but we also did not independently verify its original source or that the woman pictured is Natalie Harp. Given that only the back of her head is visible, I don’t think her identity can be confirmed from this image alone.

    Following this, Snopes used the thumbnail to conduct another reverse image search. While it failed to unearth any older versions of the image, the results (archived) included a wider shot of the subjects than any other we could find. That version, which included the “wtf” text on Edwards’ thumbnail, linked to the same Edwards video.

    None of the reverse image searches turned up links to credible news sources or even less-credible tabloids sharing the image. Considering the reporting already scrutinizing Trump’s relationship with Harp, it’s unlikely, if the image were real, that not a single credible news source would report on it. The image also did not appear among photos kept by credible photo repositories, such as Getty Images and The Associated Press.

    Although there was no photographer, date or location listed for any version of the image, the timing of its spread suggested it was likely meant to depict something that took place while Trump was visiting his golf course in Ireland on Sept. 13, an activity listed on his calendar as “Executive Time.” Photos of that golf course and Google Maps satellite view don’t show any trees, in contrast to the image of Trump and Harp kissing.

    Snopes reached out to the White House by email to ask if any photos of Trump and/or Harp at the golf course over the weekend exist in order to compare what either was wearing in those images with what they supposedly wore in the image of the kiss. The White House did not send or confirm the requested images, but a White House official said the image shared online was “clearly a fake photo.”

    While many of those who spread the photo presumed the woman was Harp, there’s no way to confirm that considering the subject’s face isn’t visible.

    Some people online claimed the image was actually a 2017 photo of Trump exchanging a cheek-kiss with Norwegian golfer Suzann Pettersen as a greeting. This is false. That kiss was not actually on the golf course, Pettersen was in a different outfit than that of the woman in the recent image and Trump was also dressed differently, as shown in images capturing the moment from 2017.

    AI evidence

    A tool by OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, detected a watermark in the higher-resolution version image consistent with those generated or edited using the company’s AI tools. Moreover, the image depicts Harp holding her golf club with six fingers.

    The lower-resolution version of the image was too blurry to clearly identify AI tells such as an excessive number of fingers on either person’s hands. While OpenAI’s tool didn’t identify a watermark within the lower-resolution image shared across X and Threads, the tool did detect OpenAI watermarks on the thumbnail for Edwards’ video.

    Separately, Snopes tested what the tool would find on a real photo where a small portion had then been edited by AI. OpenAI’s tool detected the watermark on such an image, even when the photo was cropped to remove the part that had been edited.

    Hany Farid, co-founder of deepfake detection company GetReal and a professor at Drexel University, told Snopes over email that “the high-resolution version was clearly derived from the lower-resolution version and has a SynthID watermark. As for the lower-resolution version, there is not a lot to go on here given the quality and resolution.”

    “While there are no obvious visual anomalies, the low quality/resolution is a bit of a red flag. In particular, given the apparent narrow depth of focus, this does not appear to photographed with a mobile device and is more likely taken with a DSLR that would afford this type of narrow depth of focus,” Farid continued. “Assuming this to be the case, I would expect the image quality to be better. At this point, I’d say the authenticity is inconclusive.”

  • Clean Up With Early Prime Day Robot Vacuum & Mop Deals Up to 50% Off

    Clean Up With Early Prime Day Robot Vacuum & Mop Deals Up to 50% Off

    It’s our favorite time of the year again! Amazon Prime Big Deal Days is still weeks away, but early robot vacuum and mop deals just couldn’t be contained. Amazon has already rolled out holiday-level price drops, letting you automate your floor cleaning before the sale rush begins. With smarter obstacle avoidance, self-emptying docks, and mopping pads that actually scrub, today’s cleaning bots deliver an instant quality-of-life upgrade.

    Whether you need heavy suction for pet hair, a fully hands-free auto-wash dock, or a budget-friendly bot for daily sweeps, we’re tracking the best early discounts across Ecovacs, Eufy, and Roborock. I’ll be updating this list daily with the newest deals, so check out today’s top picks below, bookmark this guide, and check back as Prime Day nears.

    Roborock Early Prime Day Deal

    Roborock Qrevo CurvX Robot Vacuum and Mop

    Dual spinning mops, auto mop lift, self-emptying/washing dock, smart mapping


    $799.99
    at Amazon

    $1,499.99
    Save $700.00


    Get Deal

    The Roborock Qrevo CurvX takes hands-free floor cleaning to the next level by handling both heavy debris and dried floor spills. Its dual spinning mops lift automatically over carpets, while powerful suction pulls embedded dirt out of rugs and hard floors. Its self-cleaning dock empties dust, washes the mops with warm water, and dries them with heat, so you avoid nasty mildew odors.

    PCMag expert Andrew Gebhart rated it “Excellent” for its “innovative self-lifting chassis, extendable brushes, and capable cleaning performance across a variety of floor surfaces,” in his in-depth review. Right now, you can get it for $799.99, which is a huge 47% off its retail value. Set your cleaning schedule in the app, let it map your home, and cross vacuuming off your weekly to-do list.

    The Best Editor-Vetted Early Prime Day Deals

    *Deals are selected by our commerce team

    Eufy Early Prime Day Deal

    Eufy C28 Robot Vacuum and Mop

    Rotating mop pads, auto-empty base, mop washing, obstacle avoidance, app control


    $529.99
    at Amazon

    $799.99
    Save $270.00


    Get Deal

    The Eufy C28 is built to keep tile and hardwood floors shining without demanding constant maintenance. It pairs solid suction power with rotating mop pads that press down firmly to scrub away sticky kitchen stains. Its smart navigation steers clear of stray cables and pet bowls, while its compact base station washes the mops and empties the onboard dustbin on its own. With easy voice control via Alexa or Google Assistant, keeping busy entryways clean takes little more than a quick spoken command. Get it now for $529.99, and save 34% on this cleaning powerhouse.

    If you want to see more options, take a look at our PCMag expert’s list of the best robot mops for 2026.

    More Deals on Robot Mops

    *Deals are selected by our commerce team

    Ecovacs Early Prime Day Deal

    Ecovacs Deebot T80S Omni Robot Vacuum and Mop

    Omni dock, LiDAR navigation, auto dust empty, hands-free mopping, multi-floor


    $478.99
    at Amazon

    $649.99
    Save $171.00


    Get Deal

    The Ecovacs Deebot T80S Omni offers full all-in-one automation at an approachable price. It uses precise LiDAR mapping to learn your home’s layout in minutes and smoothly plan efficient cleaning routes around furniture. Its Omni station drains dirty water, refills clean water, and empties collected dust into an enclosed bag that holds debris for weeks. Whether you’re dealing with daily pet shedding or dusty floorboards, it keeps high-traffic rooms tidy while you focus on other things.

    Recommended by Our Editors

    If you’re a pet owner and need something specific to deal with the shedding, check out our PCMag expert’s list of the best robot vacuums for pet hair for 2026.

    More Deals on Robot Vacuums for Pet Hair

    *Deals are selected by our commerce team

    Check out our deals page, where we round up all of the top savings from Prime Day!

    About Our Expert

  • ‘Dancing With the Stars’ Kicks Off Season 35 Premiere With the Male Celebrities: See the Scores, Who Went Home (Updating Live)

    ‘Dancing With the Stars’ Kicks Off Season 35 Premiere With the Male Celebrities: See the Scores, Who Went Home (Updating Live)

    [This story contains spoilers from the season 35 premiere of Dancing With the Stars.]

    Dancing With the Stars is finally back for season 35, and the festivities for the new season have kicked off with a special two-night premiere.

    As previously announced, the premiere episodes are split by gender, with the slate of eight male celebrities performing on Tuesday night, as the eight women celebrities will follow on Wednesday night. With a cast of 16 competing couples, the split premiere will ensure each celebrity and their professional dance partner get time to shine during the season 35 premiere.

    Coming off a dynamic, Emmy-nominated 34th season, the cast is full of reality stars, Olympians and (ABC) television stars a plenty. For both nights, the celebrities will dance to a No. 1 song from the year they were born, and yes, someone will be eliminated.

    Competing on Tuesday night is The Bachelorette alum Tyler Cameron; Paralympic gold medalist Ezra Frech; “Hanson” band member Taylor Hanson; Secret Lives of Mormon Wives‘ star Whitney Leavitt’s husband Conner Leavitt; Savannah Bananas baseball star Jackson Olson; Jimmy Kimmel Live! star Guillermo Rodriguez; Grey’s Anatomy actor Harry Shum Jr.; and influencer/comedian Connor Wood.

    After the second dance of the night, performed by Tyler and Sharna Burgess, host Julianne Hough revealed that voting was down on ABC’s website, and that viewers should send in their votes via text. Alfonso Ribeiro announced after Conner’s performance that website voting was still down, and the show was only accepting votes via text for Tuesday night’s premiere.

    During Tyler’s critiques, Derek Hough mistakenly called him Dylan. Despite the name mishap from the judge, Tyler was the early leader of the night, scoring a 17/30. However, Ezra took over that lead, earning the first two sevens from the judges, bringing his total to 20/30

    The rest of the cast who will compete on Wednesday night includes The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air star Tatyana Ali; celebrity chef and Food Network host Giada De Laurentiis; The Rookie and Step Up star Jenna Dewan; Olympic gold medalist Amber Glenn; reality star (Love Island, The Traitors) Maura Higgins; Summer House star Ciara Miller; Love Thy Nader reality star Sarah Jane Nader; and 10 Things I Hate About You actress Julia Stiles.

    The couple with the lowest combined total of judges’ scores and viewer votes is eliminated at the end of each DWTS episode. Live voting takes place during the East Coast airing of each show and ends shortly after the final performance is completed; that means if you’re a West Coast viewer and want to vote for your favorite couple, you must do so between 5 p.m. PT to roughly 7:45 p.m. PT, as voting ends after the final performance.

    See the full list of scores for the first premiere episode of DWTS season 35, featuring only performances from the male celebrities, below.

    Jackson Olson and Emma Slater: 15/30
    Tyler Cameron and Sharna Burgess: 17/30
    Conner Leavitt and Adele Zaikman: 12/30
    Guillermo Rodriguez and Witney Carson: 10/30
    Ezra Frech and Daniella Karagach: 20/30
    Connor Wood and Rylee Arnold
    Taylor Hanson and Britt Stewart
    Harry Shum Jr. and Jenna Johnson

    Season 35 of Dancing With the Stars premieres on Tuesday and Wednesday at 8 p.m., simulcasting across ABC and Disney+, and streaming the next day on Hulu. Check out all of The Hollywood Reporter‘s DWTS coverage here.

  • ‘American Idol’ Moving Production From L.A. to Georgia

    American Idol is packing up and making a big move across the United States.

    ABC’s long-running music competition series is relocating from Los Angeles to the Atlanta area, producer Fremantle confirmed to The Hollywood Reporter on Tuesday.

    American Idol‘s move is a hit to L.A.’s production landscape, especially in scripted television, a space that has seen episode counts shaved and overall orders cut over the past several years. The city saw a nearly 13 percent drop in shoot days from April to June compared to the same period last year and an 8 percent drop compared to the previous quarter, according to the latest report from permitting office FilmLA.

    On the state level, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill last year that increased the cap on film and television tax incentives from $330 million to $750 million a year. But production advocates in state and local offices have countered that that’s the first step, not a cure all, to keep film and TV cameras rolling in Hollywood’s historic home.

    Competition from other states, including Georgia, New York, New Jersey and New Mexico, as well as international markets (like Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia) has only increased on the incentives front.

    The relocation of American Idol to Georgia is a coup for the state, given that the long-running broadcast series (season 24 had a 16-episode run) offers relative stability compared to one-off features that may shoot on-location. In late July, the Georgia film office disclosed 280 productions filmed in-state over the last fiscal year, including Warner Bros.’ Superman sequel, series like Will Trent and Chad Powers, as well as Tyler Perry Studios’ productions.

    Georgia is one of the largest production hubs stateside, following California and New York, but has also seen spending from film and TV shoots decline in recent years after Marvel decamped to shoot its superhero fare in the U.K. In the second quarter of 2026, Georgia saw $405 million in production spending, down 40 percent year-over-year, per figures from industry tracker ProdPro. In the latest quarter, California, for comparison, saw $1.3 billion in production spending, up about 5 percent year-over-year.

    Local officials have pledged to find ways to cut more red tape in L.A. and bolster incentives. Mayor Karen Bass said in July that she’s “doubling down” on the subsidy program by “fighting for an uncapped tax credit,” in addition to pushing for competition reality TV series to be eligible for incentives. “We’ll keep cutting red tape and slashing permit fees at the local level, because this industry is core to the history, culture and economic power of Los Angeles,” she added at the time.

  • Emmys Hit 6.7 Million Viewers, Down 9% From Last Year

    Emmys Hit 6.7 Million Viewers, Down 9% From Last Year

    NBC’s telecast of the 78th Emmy Awards hit 6.7 million viewers on Monday night, per Nielsen.

    That total marks a 9% decrease from last year’s ceremony on CBS, which brought in 7.4 million viewers — the award show’s best performance since 2021.

    It should be noted, though, that the 2025 ceremony took place on a Sunday, making it easier for viewers to sit down for a three-hour telecast. Compared to the most recent Monday night Emmys — televised by Fox in 2024 — NBC accomplished a 41% increase. But since that telecast, which hit only a meager 4.4 million viewers, was the first in Emmys history to air with fierce competition from an NFL playoff game, the most accurate comparison is perhaps to NBC’s own Monday night Emmys in 2022. In those terms, the network’s latest Emmy efforts made a 10% improvement, up from 5.9 million viewers.

    Hosted by “Law & Order: Special Victims Unit” star Mariska Hargitay, the Emmys did air against an NFL game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Denver Broncos. Even with that competition, it drew enough viewers to rank as the the most-watched non-sports, non-news Monday telecast of 2026, both overall and among adults age 18-49. Hargitay referenced the football game in a pre-recorded sketch featuring a cameo from Taylor Swift, musing that the pop star wouldn’t be able to attend the show because she’d be supporting her husband, Chiefs player Travis Kelce.

    According to NBCUniversal, the Emmys generated 133 million social views, counted across Facebook, Instagram, X and YouTube. The company touts that that marks a 90% increase from 2025.

    It appears that this was the Emmys’ last year on a traditional broadcaster. After 31 years of rotating between NBC, CBS, Fox and ABC, the TV Academy is now in talks with Amazon Prime Video.

  • ‘Closing Night’ Review: Sarah Paulson and Naomi Watts Lead a Deluxe Cast in a Shrill Family Melodrama in Search of a Binding Tone

    ‘Closing Night’ Review: Sarah Paulson and Naomi Watts Lead a Deluxe Cast in a Shrill Family Melodrama in Search of a Binding Tone

    Is actor-turned-director Cody Fern’s debut, Closing Night, intended as a refraction of John Cassavetes’ Opening Night, the 1977 Gena Rowlands vehicle about an actress grappling with a debilitating personal crisis? Seems likely, though that would be just one of several instances of the filmmaker’s aim exceeding his reach. For at least half the movie’s running time, the desired style appears to be the heightened melodrama of Pedro Almodóvar’s tales of turbulent motherhood scarred by traumatic family secrets. But Fern lacks the firm grasp of tone to pull that off, or to smoothly navigate the eventual transition into anguish and sorrow.

    The other key influence — intentional or not — appears to be Ryan Murphy, with whom Fern has worked frequently as an actor. There’s a kinship in the arch tone, though sadly, none of the camp. Unless you count Sarah Paulson as celebrated star of stage and screen Sandra Vale, played with a death-stare severity that might be appropriate for her sadistic psycho-nurse in Murphy’s Ratched. All of which is to say that no matter how accomplished the cast, the self-conscious movie only really starts half-working once it gets out of its own way.

    Closing Night

    The Bottom Line

    A soft-impact lurch from archness to angst.

    Venue: Toronto International Film Festival (Special Presentations)
    Cast: Sarah Paulson, Naomi Watts, Dianne Wiest, Toby Wallace, Odessa A’zion
    Director: Cody Fern
    Screenwriters: Cody Fern, Devon Bostick

    1 hour 55 minutes

    Sandra is in rehearsals for her Broadway return in Brecht’s Mother Courage — and therein lies the first clue to her festering secret — but the seasoned pro is having uncharacteristic trouble remembering her lines and motivation. Nonetheless, she sends out formal invitations to her estranged family to attend the play’s opening.

    Her jittery sister April (Naomi Watts) bristles at being “summoned” to a reunion after three decades of silence. But she can’t get there fast enough, concerned that her rudderless son Theo (Toby Wallace), who’s living in New York, should be kept away from his self-absorbed aunt. Before April can run interference, Theo drops a bombshell by revealing that he has already connected with the black-sheep diva. The scowling posters of Aunt Sandra all over town suggest that encounter was all but preordained.

    April and Sandra’s tart-tongued, boozing mother Diane (Dianne Wiest, in brilliant form) takes a hard pass on the trip from their distant hometown, where she owns a shabby hair salon. But once April starts reporting back, the blowzy old woman — still pissed about Sandra sleeping with April’s boyfriend when she was 15 — hops on a plane.

    The first big news to emerge is that Toby’s girlfriend Lucy (Odessa A’zion, wasted in a nothing role) is pregnant, a fact discovered by April when she’s snooping in their bathroom and finds a positive home pregnancy test. (She also randomly steals a hairbrush, the result of a klepto habit that doesn’t add much.) Then when Sandra starts slurring and scrambling her lines before collapsing on the stage, she receives a shattering diagnosis, which helps move along the thaw between her and April — though not so much with crotchety Diane. The biggest secret, however, pertains to Theo and the reason Sandra distanced herself from the family all those years ago. If you can’t guess what that is, seriously, wake up!

    The script by Fern and fellow actor Devon Bostick takes a solemn turn in the final act, when Sandra resolves to take a drastic step and enlists April’s support to go through with it. Those developments become lugubrious, though not without affecting moments. But the leap from the seriocomedy of the early action to the sadness and self-recrimination of the concluding stretch is not something the filmmakers negotiate gracefully.

    It’s also hard to feel too much for the characters when only Theo, his emotions bounced about among the women, and Diane, who amusingly specifies while making her travel plans that she wants a hotel room with a minibar, seem like real people.

    While it’s always a pleasure to watch Paulson and Watts work, Fern forces them to work way too hard. (Certainly harder than they have to work on Murphy’s risibly awful legal soap, All’s Fair, in which performance integrity seems irrelevant.) Sandra and April are characters who might almost have been more at home in some kind of chewy Southern Gothic that didn’t have to rely so heavily on Diane to inject a bit of much-needed humor. That said, Watts does prompt a wicked smirk or two when April instantly appropriates Sandra’s misfortune as her own.

    Ultimately though, whether it’s going for caustic dysfunctional family chaos or somber drama, any movie with this lineup of female talent ought to be a lot juicier.