Blog

  • Biopic About Gambling Influencer Vegas Matt in the Works From Filmmaker Mike Young (Exclusive)

    Biopic About Gambling Influencer Vegas Matt in the Works From Filmmaker Mike Young (Exclusive)

    Filmmaker Mike Young is betting on an indie film about the real-life gambler known as Vegas Matt.

    Red Leaf Entertainment is developing The Chop, a rags-to-riches drama movie that has set Young to pen the script and produce. The feature is inspired by the true story of Stephen Matt Morrow, aka Vegas Matt, and his path to becoming an advantage slot player and gambling influencer with more than 1.6 million YouTube subscribers.

    The Chop is eyeing a 2027 production start and has not yet announced a director. Additional financing, production and casting details are set to be shared at a later date.

    This project centers on Morrow, a dedicated husband and father whose life changes when he embraces the high-stakes world of advantage gambling in Las Vegas. The story sees the lead character connect with a band of misfit gamblers, and as the collective soon rises to fame, Morrow grapples with the challenges inherent with his success.

    Young is a writer, filmmaker and stand-up comedian. He wrote and directed Stealing Jokes, a feature starring Michael Rapaport that has landed theatrical distribution from Byron Allen’s Freestyle.

    “Vegas Matt hired me to write his story, and I was immediately drawn to the human side of his journey,” Young says. “This isn’t just a story about Las Vegas or gambling. It is about trust, friendship and the American Dream he never predicted.”

    Morrow adds, “Mike understands that the most compelling part of this story is not what happened at the tables or the lucky spins — it is this invisible economy that no one knows exists and the subculture that goes with it. There were real risks, real relationships and a lot of moments that changed my life. I’m excited to work with Mike to bring our story to the screen.”

  • Robert Kraft Responds After Macklemore Invites Him to Match His $1M Donation to Support Palestinian People

    Robert Kraft Responds After Macklemore Invites Him to Match His $1M Donation to Support Palestinian People

    Shortly after Macklemore revealed that he’s donating $1 million to support Palestinian people, in addition to inviting billionaire Robert Kraft to match his donation, the Gillette Stadium owner has replied.

    Kraft wrote in a statement on X Wednesday afternoon that he plans “to commit $2 million to match his donation to aid in the region to fight this humanitarian crisis.”

    “I have dedicated much of my life to building bridges between all people. I believe deeply that all lives are worth protecting,” the New England Patriots owner said. “Earlier today, before Macklemore challenged me to match his donation, Ed called me and asked me to commit $2 million to match his donation to aid in the region to fight this humanitarian crisis. Ed has plans to reach out to other venue owners and our goal is to continue to work together to build bridges.”

    This came after The Hollywood Reporter learned earlier this week that Macklemore was dropped as an opener for Ed Sheeran‘s Loop Tour after making headlines for his pro-Palestine speeches during his performances. The tour promoter stated that upcoming venues hosting shows threatened to pull out if Macklemore remained on the lineup.

    In response to being dropped from the tour, Macklemore alleged that Kraft “rallied some of the other stadium owners and collectively they gave him an ultimatum: if Macklemore stays on the tour, you will not be allowed to play in our venues.” Sheeran’s tour was slated to play at Kraft’s Gillette Stadium in Massachusetts at the end of September.

    Kraft defended his decision, writing in his own statement at the time, “Gillette Stadium has a longstanding commitment to providing a welcoming environment for all guests and ensuring that events held at our venue do not provide a platform for hate speech. Based on Macklemore’s recent actions, material shared from the stage during Ed Sheeran’s shows in New Jersey, and a broader history of antisemitic rhetoric and imagery that we believe has been deeply offensive and hurtful to the Jewish community, we determined that his participation in the September 25th and 26th concerts at Gillette Stadium would cross that line.”

    Amid the fallout, Finneas, Danish pop band Lukas Graham and Irish singer Aaron Rowe, who were all expected to open for Sheeran on tour, have since dropped out in solidarity with Macklemore.

    Sheeran also reiterated in his own statement, “Macklemore coming off tour was the promoter’s decision, it was not mine. Macklemore’s contract for the tour was with the promoter, not me.”

    Earlier on Wednesday, Macklemore announced that he was donating $1 million of his net earnings from Sheeran’s Loop Tour to organizations working to help Palestinian people.

    “With everything that has happened over the last 48 hours, I want to bring the conversation back to where it belongs: to the Palestinian people who are still being killed, still living under military occupation, and still fighting for their freedom,” the rapper wrote in a lengthy statement on Instagram. “I will be donating the entire $1 million of my net earnings from Ed Sheeran’s Loop Tour to six organizations working directly to support the Palestinian people. And I invite Robert Kraft to match my donation. Whatever we disagree about, perhaps we can agree on this: Palestinian lives are worth protecting. A Palestinian life is no less valuable than another life on this earth.”

    “That is what this has always been about. Not me. Not a tour. Not the headlines or the controversy,” Macklemore added. “It is about Palestinians rights to freedom, dignity and safety in their own homeland.”

  • Jessica Chastain to Star in New Netflix Drama Series ‘The Retrievals’

    Jessica Chastain to Star in New Netflix Drama Series ‘The Retrievals’

    Jessica Chastain has joined Netflix’s “The Retrievals,” a new drama series from the streamer.

    The Oscar-winning actor will star as Kaitlyn Langford, a former art historian who has “spent the last decade stuck in an endless cycle of failed fertility treatments,” per Netflix. “When she learns she’s also a victim of criminal drug diversion at the Yale Fertility Center, she faces a devastating personal reckoning and becomes a key plaintiff in this historic lawsuit against Yale.”

    Chastain “was the writing team’s ‘exemplar’ while crafting the role of Kaitlyn,” said showrunner, writer and executive producer Molly Smith Metzler. “As a performer, she has the rare ability to convey extreme restraint and unbridled freefall, often at the same time. It gives me goosebumps just thinking about what Jessica’s going to do with this role.”

    Chastain joins previously announced cast members Emilia Jones and Amy Ryan.

    As previously reported by Variety, the show will follow “an unlikely community of IVF patients who come together to crusade against Yale University after they are operated on without anesthesia — because a nurse stole their fentanyl.”

    “The Retrievals” is based on the New York Times and Serial Productions podcast of the same name by Susan Burton.

    In addition to Metzler, the series is executive produced by Dani Gorin, Tom Ackerley, and Margot Robbie for LuckyChap; Colin McKenna (“Maid,” “Sirens”), Caitlin Roper for The New York Times, and podcast writer Susan Burton. The project is produced by LuckyChap and Quiet Coyote. Lila Neugebauer (“Maid,” “Sirens,” “The Beast in Me”) serves as the pilot director and executive producer.

  • ‘Re/Pair’ Review: David Schwimmer, W. Kamau Bell and Van Jones Lead Pragmatic Doc About the Past and Present of Black-Jewish Relations

    ‘Re/Pair’ Review: David Schwimmer, W. Kamau Bell and Van Jones Lead Pragmatic Doc About the Past and Present of Black-Jewish Relations

    The coalition between Blacks and Jews was integral to shaping 20th-century America, steering entertainment, sports and politics as two groups often “othered” within our cultural tapestry found power in unity. But where shared values and purpose led to joint fights against fascism and prejudice, events like the Crown Heights riots and the aftermath of the tragedies of October 7, 2023, exposed schisms.

    The relationship has been so crucial to the identities of both groups and to our country that Henry Louis Gates Jr. produced Black and Jewish America: An Interwoven History, which premiered on PBS in February of this year. It’s a great docuseries, though one that feels like it’s barely scratching the surface of this interwoven history in four hours.

    Re/Pair

    The Bottom Line

    So-so as history, but a potent conversation-starter.

    Venue: Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF Docs)
    Director: Lacey Schwartz Delgado

    1 hour 41 minutes

    It’s no surprise, then, that Lacey Schwartz Delgado’s Re/Pair, a new 101-minute documentary premiering at the Toronto International Film Festival, feels important but short of essential.

    If you haven’t seen the Gates series and don’t know the history of Blacks and Jews in America in any particular depth, Re/Pair offers only a faint whiff of that history, rushing through or eliding information that’s crucial to understanding and appreciating the surrounding issues. Watch the Gates doc first.

    If, however, your foundational knowledge is sufficient, the conversations that Delgado stages will be a potent complement to that knowledge, illustrating the very human gaps that could be bridged if we were all smart, sensitive and forced to engage in debate in perfectly lit spaces with cameras rolling.

    Delgado’s film begins with the Martin Luther King Jr. quote, “People fail to get along with each other because they fear each other. They fear each other because they don’t know each other. They don’t know each other because they have not properly communicated with each other.”

    Her approach, then, is to stage that communication with 19 paired dialogues, bringing together groups of Black and Jewish artists, pundits, spiritual leaders and more. Some of the pairs are longtime friends, some are former collaborators and others are just meeting for the first time, though I wish those parameters were more clearly acknowledged in each case.

    The documentary’s title acknowledges both the format and the concept of Tikkun olam, the repairing of the world.

    There are interview subjects whom everybody will know, including David Schwimmer and Harry Lennix, whose relationship dates back to their shared time at Northwestern, and many more who are generally known, including the likes of W. Kamau Bell, Robert Klein, Susan Orlean, Matisyahu and Van Jones (also an executive producer). Then there are are wide assortment of “if you know, you know” thinkers and personalities who are beloved or revered (or in a few cases, detested) in their particular spheres.

    The interview environs are simple and casual — chairs in a dark room, perfectly shot, with no apparent suggested dress code. Delgado is largely unheard, so the interview prompting seems to have been minimal. I can’t say if the subjects were asked questions, given brief prompts or shown some of the documentary’s historical background footage, which is generally adequate, but probably not more than that.

    The overall feeling is incredibly loose and, in some cases, almost certainly too loose. Nineteen pairings means meeting 38 subjects, making it hard to imagine achieving equal balance in less than two hours, but at least a third of the pairings are barely featured at all or are featured through only one side of the back-and-forth. I wonder if a more assertive directing hand would have led to more involvement or, in some cases, pushed the conversations into slightly more provocative territory. There are some chats in which follow-up questions might have been ideal, with at least one subject coming across as fairly antisemitic in a way that I’m not convinced they intended — but since there’s no pursuing the issue, it’s left unclear.

    Some of the conversations are complicated, but remain on safe terrain, with Matisyahu and Che “Rhymefest” Smith talking about musical appropriation and authenticity.

    Some are couched in history, with several subjects discussing the impact of Jesse Jackson’s notorious “Hymietown” comments, including Rev. Jackson’s daughter Ashley.

    Some struggle to reckon with decades of shifting Black allegiances and American Jewish responsibilities relating to Israel and Gaza.

    Intersectionality plays a key role in many or most of the best conversations, particularly the ones with subjects who identify as both Black and Jewish.

    There are definitely standout pairings, like the clergy double-bill of Rabbi Sharon Brous and Rev. Michael-Ray Mathews or the respectful debates between Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors and Rabbi Susan Goldberg.

    Then there are the people who have nothing at all to say, some of them from that group of big names. I’m not going to call them out, but you can practically feel Delgado’s disappointment at getting nearly nothing of use from some of her subjects.

    And, as befits a subject this contentious, anybody who tunes in with a deeply personal connection to either side will probably experience moments of discomfort, feel put on the spot or ignored or prioritized at different points. This was the case with An Interwoven History as well.

    “Solidarity is about growing our ability to be more compassionate toward each other,” Cullors observes. Re/Pair isn’t a perfect recap of history, but it’s an effective cog in a valuable empathy machine, capturing at least the path that leads us to the path forward.

  • Ed Sheeran Backlash Explodes as Ms. Rachel, Hannah Einbinder and More Slam Singer After Macklemore Dropped From Tour: ‘Silence During a Genocide Is Not Neutral’

    Ed Sheeran Backlash Explodes as Ms. Rachel, Hannah Einbinder and More Slam Singer After Macklemore Dropped From Tour: ‘Silence During a Genocide Is Not Neutral’

    Voices across Hollywood and Washington are speaking out after Macklemore was dropped from Ed Sheeran’s Loop Tour for making pro-Palestine comments on stage.

    “Hacks” star Hannah Einbinder, one of TV’s most politically outspoken stars, wrote on her Instagram stories on Tuesday, “Ed Sheeran i say this as a ginger. i hope you get a REALLY bad sun burn. the kind on the back of your entire body where it hurts to lie down or walk or sit.”

    YouTuber and children’s entertainer Ms. Rachel also took to Instagram to call out Sheeran. She wrote on Monday, “Ed Sheeran had an opportunity [to] show that we won’t be bullied into punishing people for supporting Palestine. Instead he caved to people who refuse to accept what the world knows. A genocide is happening in Gaza. We all need to speak out against it.”

    She added, “If more than 20,000 white children were killed in another part of the world, everyone would be shouting about it at their concerts. Treating some children’s lives as less worthy of outrage is racist. Silence during a genocide is not neutral.”

    “Wicked” star Marissa Bode, who is in a wheelchair, said in a TikTok video, “Ed Sheeran, my legs may not work like they used to before, but at least I have a fucking spine. Free Palestine, bitch!”

    Sen. Bernie Sanders posted a statement on X, slamming New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, whom Macklemore partially blamed for his removal from the Loop Tour in a statement about his exit. “In the United States of America, billionaire stadium owners should not be able to silence artists because they speak out on political issues. Today it is the genocide in Gaza. What’s next? If they can silence one artist, they can silence anyone,” Sanders wrote.

    On Sept. 4, Macklemore sang out “Free Palestine” during his set at New Jersey’s MetLife Stadium. The comments made headlines, and the rapper was removed from Sheeran’s Loop Tour on Sept. 14. The same day, Macklemore released a lengthy statement on Instagram explaining his side of the story. He wrote, “Last Monday, in the middle of all the media attention surrounding Pink and what I said at MetLife, Ed told me that Robert Kraft called him. We were scheduled to play Gillette Stadium later this month, which is owned by the Kraft Group. Ed told me that Kraft said I would not be allowed to perform in his stadium. Ed also told me that Kraft had rallied some of the other stadium owners and collectively they gave him an ultimatum: if Macklemore stays on the tour, you will not be allowed to play in our venues.”

    He added, “Ed was in a fucked up position. He knew it. His typical apolitical stance was being challenged in a way it never had been before. He told me that the words ‘Free Palestine’ and the image of the Palestinian flag were hurtful to a lot of people he spoke with. I told him that if those words were more offensive than tens of thousands of Palestinian children being killed by Israel, then there was a fundamental disconnect between where those people stood and where I stood. But he couldn’t get past his public facing, ‘I don’t take sides.’”

    On Sept. 15, Sheeran released his own statement. He claimed that he spoke with venue owners “at length all week to try and build a bridge” after Macklemore’s comments. Sheeran also asserted that dropping Macklemore was “the promoter’s decision, it was not mine.”

    “I would never let down the fans who had made plans, nor would I abandon the touring crew and the other support acts and musicians who rely on me for work and to make a living,” he added.

    Despite Sheeran’s comments, openers Finneas, Aaron Rowe, Lukas Graham and Irish band Beoga all left the tour after Macklemore was dropped.

    On Wednesday, Macklemore announced that he will donate the $1 million net earnings he received from the Loop Tour to organizations that support the Palestinian people.

    “With everything that has happened over the last 48 hours, I want to bring the conversation back to where it belongs: to the Palestinian people who are still being killed, still living under military occupation, and still fighting for their freedom,” he wrote on Instagram. “I will be donating the entire $1 million of my net earnings from Ed Sheeran’s Loop Tour to six organizations working directly to support the Palestinian people. And I invite Robert Kraft to match my donation. Whatever we disagree about, perhaps we can agree on this: Palestinian lives are worth protecting. A Palestinian life is no less valuable than any other life on this earth.”

    Shortly after Macklemore’s announcement, Kraft put out a statement saying that he and Sheeran are donating $2 million each to the Palestinian cause. The statement, released on the Gillette Stadium X account, read, “I have dedicated much of my life to building bridges between all people. I believe deeply that all lives are worth protecting. Earlier today, before Macklemore challenged me to match his donation, Ed called me and asked me to commit $2 million to match his donation to aid in the region to fight this humanitarian crisis. Ed now plans to reach out to other venue owners and our goal is to continue to work together to build bridges”

  • Flamingo Estate’s Richard Christiansen on Pamela Anderson’s Pickles, Julianne Moore’s Honey and the Dolly Parton Coffee That ‘Got Away’

    Flamingo Estate’s Richard Christiansen on Pamela Anderson’s Pickles, Julianne Moore’s Honey and the Dolly Parton Coffee That ‘Got Away’

    Richard Christiansen was working in the offices at Flamingo Estate, his farm and lifestyle brand in the Highland Park neighborhood of Los Angeles, when Pamela Anderson’s son, Brandon Lee, called him to ask if he’d be interested in collaborating with his mother.

    “He said, ‘Would you like to do something with my mom? She’s a big gardener,’” Christiansen recalls. “They don’t have the same surname, so I didn’t know who he was talking about so I was like, ‘OK, who’s your mom?’ He said, ‘Pamela Anderson.’ I was like, ‘Holy shit!”

    At that point, Flamingo Estate was making a name for itself, among other things, for its celeb honey collaborations. Christiansen had already partnered with Julianne Moore and LeBron James to create their limited-edition lines of honey. All Flamingo Estate celebrity partnerships benefit not-for-profits. The celebs do not get paid for their work.

    When Anderson arrived for their first meeting, Christiansen gave her his customary honey pitch. “I wanted her to do a honey, like many of the ones we’ve done,” says Christiansen, who grew up on a bee farm in Australia. “Honey’s easy for us. I take my hives to someone’s house to do. Like we tied them to LeBron’s roof or for Ed Ruscha recently, we put the hives in his studio. Julianne Moore’s honey was from her garden in Montauk. It’s some of the best. It’s dark and it’s almost molasses, like whisky.”

    But Anderson had another idea. “She said matter-of-factly, ‘I want to do pickles with you. It’s my aunt’s recipe,’” Christiansen says. Anderson’s $38 jars of pickles raised $500,000 for the California Wildlife Center.

    I am talking to Christiansen on Zoom shortly before the release of his new book, “Pleasure Principles.” The gorgeously illustrated and designed 408-page tome, subtitled “An Almanac from the Garden,” features recipes, DIY projects and musings on a range of topics from the cinematic history of the moon to celebrity restaurants in L.A.

    If anything, “Pleasure Principles” serves as a look inside Christiansen’s very creative and colorful mind. “I don’t have a car,” he explains. “I ride my bicycle everywhere, and when I’m on my bike, I dictate into my phone. That’s maybe why everything’s short, these short little stories.”

    Christiansen’s latest Hollywood collaboration is a first for him, a movie tie-in with “Practical Magic 2.” Not only do several Flamingo Estate products, including bottles of olive oil and Green Goddess candles, appear in the movie, but Christiansen has also curated a gift box inspired by the Nicole Kidman and Sandra Bullock film.

    It’s a few days after Dolly Parton passed away in August. I ask Christiansen to name a celebrity he’d love to work with. “We were going to do a coffee with Dolly called ‘8 to 6’ instead of ‘9 to 5,’” he says. “We had some lovely conversations about it, and then it didn’t end up happening because we were too young at that point and our distribution probably couldn’t handle the weight of her reach. That was the one that got away.”

  • Old video shows Trump saying US should take Iran’s oil

    Old video shows Trump saying US should take Iran’s oil

    Claim:

    A video authentically shows U.S. President Donald Trump in 1987 saying that the U.S. should “go in” and take Iran’s oil.

    Rating:

    True

    Since the beginning of the Iran war in late February 2026, people have shared a video allegedly showing U.S. President Donald Trump in 1987 advocating to “go in” and take the Middle Eastern country’s oil.

    In the purported clip, Trump says of Iran, “You take their oil. That’s what I’d do,” adding, “You go in.” Journalist Barbara Walters asks how he would take the oil, inquiring, “Would you take a chance in a war?” Trump responds, appearing to say a war would be inevitable even if the U.S. did nothing, telling her: “You’re going to have a war. … You’re going to have a war by being weak.”

    Users shared (archived) the video (archived) on Bluesky (archived), Facebook (archived) and X (archived), among other platforms.

    In sum, the decades-old clip is authentic, meaning that it was not created with artificial intelligence or other digital fakery. Trump truly advocated for going into Iran in 1987, saying, “You take the oil. That’s what I’d do.”

    Trump posted the video on Truth Social on March 30, as some users accurately pointed out (archived). The video in his post begins with him saying, “because I’m running for the presidency.” A longer video shows he fully says, “I’m not here today because I’m running for the presidency.”

    The clip originates from an episode of ABC’s “20/20” featuring a profile of Trump by Walters. Newspaper archives pin (archived) the segment’s apparent air date as Dec. 11, 1987.

    Snopes emailed the White House to ask whether the Trump administration wished to respond to users sharing the video and will update this article if we receive further details.

    Days after reposting the clip, on April 3, Trump posted a message matching his stance from nearly 39 years before, saying he wanted to take Iran’s oil:

    With a little more time, we can easily OPEN THE HORMUZ STRAIT, TAKE THE OIL, & MAKE A FORTUNE. IT WOULD BE A “GUSHER” FOR THE WORLD??? President DONALD J. TRUMP

    (Donald Trump via Truth Social)

    Transcript of Trump’s 1987 remarks on Iran

    A lengthier video from the “20/20” segment appears on Vimeo and YouTube, with the part about Iran beginning just after the two-minute mark.

    The longer clip features more details, including journalist Charles Bremner remarking on Trump’s stance:

    WALTERS (voice-over): But does Donald Trump want to be president?

    TRUMP (speaking to the Portsmouth, New Hampshire, Rotary Club): I’m not here today because I’m running for the presidency. I’m here because I’m personally tired of seeing this great country of ours being ripped off.

    WALTERS (voice-over): But as far as Trump is concerned, our allies are only part of the problem. The real culprit is Iran.

    TRUMP (speaking to the Rotary Club): Why couldn’t we go in and take over some of their oil, which is along the sea?

    WALTERS (speaking to Trump): How would you do that? Would you send in the Marines? Would you take a chance in a war?

    TRUMP: Let ’em have Iran. You take their oil. That’s what I’d do.

    WALTERS: But how?

    TRUMP: How?

    WALTERS: I mean, do we want a war? What do you mean, we take their oil?

    TRUMP: You go in… you go in…

    WALTERS: How do we go in?

    TRUMP: You’re going to have a war. Barbara… You’re going to have a war by being weak.

    WALTERS: OK. How do we go in? What do we do?

    TRUMP: Excuse me.

    WALTERS: Yeah.

    TRUMP: You’re going to have a war, and it’s going to start in the Middle East.

    WALTERS: What if the Soviet Union said, “You do this to Iran, we’re going to come in?”

    TRUMP: I don’t believe they’d do it. The next time Iran attacks this country, go in and grab one of their big oil installations, and I mean, grab it and keep it, and get back your losses, because this country has lost plenty because of Iran.

    BREMNER (speaking to off-camera interviewer): Donald Trump seems to have a Clint Eastwood approach to foreign policy.

    WALTERS (voice-over): Charles Bremner is the New York correspondent for the London Times. He wrote this article that appeared in the Times the week following Trump’s New Hampshire speech.

    BREMNER: He recommended strikes at Iranian oil fields. This obviously would create a great chain reaction across the area if it ever took place. And obviously, European allies would be appalled by any such behavior.

    We messaged Bremner on X to ask whether he wished to share any new comment about the parallels of the video from the past lining up with the war and will update this article if we receive a response.

    The report also notes that Trump took out a full-page advertisement in The New York Times (archived) and other newspapers in September 1987 with the title “There’s nothing wrong with America’s Foreign Defense Policy that a little backbone can’t cure.” The ad displays an open letter from Trump “on why America should stop paying to defend countries that can afford to defend themselves.” It does not mention Iran.

    For further reading regarding Trump in the 1980s, we previously reported about whether a photo shows Trump in Moscow, when he was 41, at the invitation of Yuri Dubinin, the Soviet ambassador to the U.S. We’ve also covered a number of instances in which Trump has posted inauthentic images and videos, often generated with AI, on social media.

  • Is current Congress most productive in 80 years, as Mike Johnson claimed? We checked the numbers

    Is current Congress most productive in 80 years, as Mike Johnson claimed? We checked the numbers

    Claim:

    The 119th Congress, which has been active between 2025 and 2026, is the most productive Congress in 80 years, as Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson claimed in September 2026.

    Rating:

    False

    In September 2026, with the midterm elections only two months away, Republican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson appealed to voters that the GOP-led Congress gets things done.

    For example, while speaking at the Republican Midterm Convention in Dallas on Sept. 10, Johnson claimed (archived) the 119th Congress — which is ongoing as of this writing and scheduled to end on Jan. 3, 2027 — has been “the most productive Congress in 80 years”:

    The media won’t tell you this, but this has been one of the most productive congresses in the history of the institution since 1789. In the House, we passed over 900 pieces of legislation, and that includes the Save America Act four times. It’s been the most productive Congress in 80 years, and we’re not done yet.

    Social media users who shared the clip (archived, archived) focused on Johnson’s “most productive Congress in 80 years” remark. Other videos of him making similar claims were shared on YouTube (archived).

    Snopes contacted Johnson’s staff to ask what metric he used when calling the 119th Congress the most productive in 80 years. We had not received a reply prior to publication but will update this article if we hear back.

    In the absence of a response, we used multiple potential metrics to compare the productivity of the 119th Congress, which has a Republican-led House and Senate, to that of the 118th Congress (Republican-led House, Democrat-led Senate through caucusing) and the 117th Congress (Democrat-led House and Senate, the latter through caucusing and the vice president’s tie-breaking votes).

    Based on the metrics we used, the 119th Congress was not as productive as either of its two predecessors. Therefore, we’ve rated this claim false.

    According to Congress.gov, the House of Representatives has passed or agreed upon 922 pieces of legislation as of Sept. 14, 2026 (though the 119th Congress is not complete until Jan. 3, 2027). During the 118th Congress, the House passed or agreed upon 995 pieces of Legislation. During the 117th Congress, the House passed or agreed upon 1,127.

    It is possible the 119th Congress could surpass the 118th and 117th Congresses by its end. Even so, it would likely fall short of beating prior Congresses from the past 80 years, as measured by the number of bills passed or agreed upon by the House of Representatives. For example, there were 1,663 such bills in the 93rd Congress, which served between 1973 and 1974.

    To measure Congress’ productivity as a whole, we can compare what each Congress has passed or agreed upon in both the House and Senate, as well as how many laws they were able to pass. A piece of legislation needs to pass in both chambers of Congress and then be signed by the president to become law.

    Both chambers of the 119th Congress have passed or agreed upon 139 pieces of legislation as of this writing. That’s compared to 315 pieces of legislation from the 118th Congress and 397 pieces of legislation from the 117th Congress.

    The 119th Congress has produced 110 new laws, whereas the 118th Congress made 274 and the 117th made 365.

    GovTrack, which compiles statistics on legislative action in Congress, also measures total enacted legislation when including bills that ultimately passed by being included in another bill (via incorporation). This might include acts that were ultimately passed as part of an annual budget bill, for example. Even when including such legislation, the 119th Congress has so far enacted 429 pieces of legislation, according to GovTrack, as opposed to 619 pieces of legislation in the 118th Congress and 1,236 in the 117th Congress.

    GovTrack also compiles a “Total” figure that includes: enacted legislation, enacted legislation (including via incorporation), passed resolutions, bills and resolutions that had a significant vote but weren’t passed or enacted, failed legislation, vetoed bills, and bills and resolutions that were introduced or reported but saw no further action. The 119th Congress’ total of 18,670 is bigger than the 117th’s of 17,817, but is smaller than the 118th’s of 19,315 and several of those in the 1970s, that ranged between 22,313 and 26,222.

    In sum, based on every relevant metric Snopes could find, it is incorrect to call this Congress the most productive in the past 80 years — at least to date.

  • Did Trump say he now owned ‘tallest’ building in downtown Manhattan during 9/11 interview?

    Did Trump say he now owned ‘tallest’ building in downtown Manhattan during 9/11 interview?

    Claim:

    Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, then-real estate developer Donald Trump said 40 Wall Street, a building he owns, was “the tallest” in downtown Manhattan or New York City.

    Rating:

    Correct Attribution

    Context

    Trump specifically called 40 Wall Street the tallest building on downtown Manhattan, not all of Manhattan or New York City. Whether Trump’s comments amounted to bragging, as some people online claimed, is open to interpretation.

    Around the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a claim (archived) circulated online that U.S. President Donald Trump, then a New York City real estate developer, said after the attacks that he now owned the tallest building in downtown Manhattan or New York City.

    For example, one X user posted a clip from an alleged TV news interview with Trump captioned, “Here is Trump on 9/11 bragging that Trump Tower is now the tallest building in Manhattan.”

    Similar claims that Trump had said his building was the tallest in Manhattan or even New York City after the Twin Towers fell circulated on Facebook (archived), Instagram (archived), Threads (archived), and Reddit (archived). Snopes readers also contacted us to ask about the claim.

    Trump did tell (time code 2:05, archived) a reporter soon after the 9/11 attacks that 40 Wall Street, which the Trump Organization still owns, was “the tallest” building in downtown Manhattan (not Manhattan as a whole or New York City). As such, we’ve rated this quote as correctly attributed to Trump.

    Whether Trump’s comments amounted to bragging, as some people online claimed, is open to interpretation. 

    Fox 5 New York posted a video of Trump’s phone interview with WWOR-TV reporter Alan Marcus on YouTube in 2016. Trump made the claim about owning the tallest building in downtown Manhattan after Marcus asked if 40 Wall Street had sustained any damage during the attacks. The exchange went as follows (at 1:43 — emphasis ours):

    MARCUS: Donald, you have one of the landmark buildings down in the financial district, 40 Wall Street, did you have any damage or did you know what’s happened down there?

    TRUMP: Well, it was an amazing phone call I made. 40 Wall Street actually was the second-tallest building in downtown Manhattan. And it was, actually before the World Trade Center, was the tallest. And then when they built the World Trade Center, it became known as the second-tallest. And now it’s the tallest.

    During the 2001 interview, Marcus also asked Trump how he would have handled 9/11 if he were president given that he had considered running for the office the year before (at 4:14). Trump said he would have taken a “very, very tough line” against “the group of people that did this.”

    In an interview with Politico in 2016, Marcus reportedly said that Trump’s remark about 40 Wall Street was “Donald being Donald.” Marcus added, “He is the brand manager of Trump, and he is going to tout that brand, and he does it reflexively.”

    Trump’s claim that 40 Wall Street was the tallest building in downtown Manhattan following the attacks was incorrect. The nearby 952-foot tall 70 Pine Street skyscraper, which was also part of the Manhattan skyline in 2001, is 26 feet taller than 40 Wall Street.

    For further reading, Snopes previously investigated whether Trump attacked the National September 11 Memorial & Museum in New York for telling him he would not be allowed to speak at its 25th-anniversary commemoration. 

    Snopes’ archives contributed to this report.

    Sources

    40 Wall Street. https://40wallstreet.com/.

    ’70 Pine Street’. Wikipedia, 28 May 2026. Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=70_Pine_Street&oldid=1356590411.

    ‘Donald Trump Calls Into WWOR/UPN 9 News on 9/11’. YouTube, 12 Sept. 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcKlPhFIE7w&t=103s.

    Kruse, Michael. ‘What Trump and Clinton Did on 9/11’. Politico Magazine, 10 Sept. 2016, https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/trump-hillary-clinton-september-11-911-attacks-nyc-214236/.

    ‘List of Tallest Buildings in New York City’. Wikipedia, 27 Aug. 2026. Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_tallest_buildings_in_New_York_City&oldid=1371688173.

    ‘WWOR-TV’. Wikipedia, 2 Sept. 2026. Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WWOR-TV&oldid=1372820808.
     

  • ‘Cute’: Danish Drama Tackling Sexual Taboos Launches Trailer Ahead of San Sebastian Premiere (Exclusive)

    ‘Cute’: Danish Drama Tackling Sexual Taboos Launches Trailer Ahead of San Sebastian Premiere (Exclusive)

    The Hollywood Reporter can unveil the trailer for Marlene Emilie Lyngstad’s debut feature Cute, set to premiere at the San Sebastian Film Festival this week.

    The Danish film, a bold confrontation of sexual taboos, fetishisation and adult attraction to children, is written by Lyngstad and Emilie Koefoed Larse. It follows a man called Richard (Jan Gunnar Røise) who is troubled by forbidden feelings for his seven-year-old stepdaughter. He decides to leave his girlfriend and retreats to his childhood home to renovate it ahead of its sale, but his self-imposed exile is disrupted by the childlike presence of his mother’s caregiver, Stella.

    Richard soon discovers her double life as a Lolita camgirl, and the two develop a transgressive surrogate father-daughter relationship. Their constructed reality begins to unravel when the stepdaughter he left behind reaches out.

    The Nordisk Film Production, co-producing with Film i Väst and Amarcord, co-stars Gina Jaqueline, a social media influencer and OnlyFans creator making her feature film debut. Karin Bertling, Molly Kirk Rasmussen and Kitt Maiken Mortensen also feature.

    “I have accepted that I am unable to ignore the things that scare and sadden me,” said the Norwegian filmmaker Lyngstad. “This is why, through my films, I attempt to reshape apathy and melancholia into curiosity.”

    “Something that especially scares me is the blurred line between romantic love and fetishisation. Cute is an attempt to examine this line,” she continues. “It is a story of two people who, more than anything, long for authentic intimacy, but who can’t avoid humiliating each other in their pursuit of it.”

    Carl Osbæck Adelkild’s serves as producer, alongside co-producers Thomas Robsahm, Thomas Heinesen, Kristina Börjeson, Evelina Jacobsson and Johanna Bergenstråhle.

    Cute will premiere at the San Sebastian Film Festival on Sept. 20 in the New Directors section. The Spanish festival runs Sept. 18-26.

    Check out the trailer below.