Author: rb809rb

  • Rockets C Steven Adams out for season, undergoes surgery after suffering left ankle injury

    The Houston Rockets will be without Steven Adams for the rest of the season.

    Adams underwent season-ending surgery on his left ankle on Wednesday, according to ESPN’s Shams Charania. Adams had already been out indefinitely with the sprained ankle, though there was no timetable provided for him to return.

    Advertisement

    Adams went down in the team’s win over the New Orleans Pelicans earlier this month. He was trying to guard Zion Williamson at the rim, but Adams immediately grabbed his left ankle after landing back down on the court from contesting a shot. He crashed to the floor and had to be helped off the court back to the locker room.

    Rockets coach Ime Udoka initially said that Adams had a “severely sprained ankle,” but that nothing was broken. While specifics aren’t known, the injury was clearly something Adams wasn’t going to be able to recover from quickly.

    Adams has averaged 5.8 points and 8.6 rebounds per game in Houston this season, his second with the team. Clint Capela has largely stepped in to replace Adams in his absence behind starter Alperen Şengün.

    Advertisement

    Adams is now the second major injury the Rockets are dealing with this season. They are also without point guard Fred VanVleet, who went down with a torn ACL during a workout in September.

    Houston currently holds a 28-16 record entering Wednesday night’s game with the San Antonio Spurs. While they are in fourth in the Western Conference standings, they are just two games back from the Spurs in second place.

  • Champions League results: Arsenal, Liverpool, Manchester City among teams into Round of 16; Benfica scores last-gasp goal for playoffs berth

    The drama of Matchday 8 was saved until the very last kick of the opening phase of the 2025-26 Champions League.

    Up 3-2 against nine-man Real Madrid and needing to score again for a goal-differential tie-breaker advantage over Marseille and Pafos, Benfica goalkeeper Anatoliy Trubin headed home a free kick in the 98th minute to send José Mourinho’s men into February’s playoffs.

    The defeat affected Real Madrid as well as it finishes ninth in the table and will be a seeded team in next month’s two-legged playoffs.

    Advertisement

    Eight teams won’t have to worry about playing Champions League soccer in February. Arsenal, Bayern Munich, Liverpool, Tottenham, Barcelona, Chelsea, Sporting and Manchester City all earned automatic places in March’s Round of 16.

    The Gunners beat Kairat Almaty 3-2 on Wednesday to take the top overall spot with an 8-0-0 record. Viktor Gyökeres opened the scoring two minutes into the match and Kai Havertz helped regain the lead after 15 minutes.

    Finishing behind Arsenal in the table is Bayern Munich, who earned second place after a 2-1 win over PSV, thanks to a Harry Kane 84th-minute goal.

    Along with Real Madrid, Inter Milan, PSG, Newcastle, Juventus Atlético Madrid, Atalanta and Bayer Leverkusen will be the seeded teams in the playoffs. Borussia Dortmund, Olympiacos, Club Brugge, Galatasaray, Monaco, Qarabağ, Bodø/Glimt and Benfica all move on as well and will be the unseeded clubs in the next round.

    Wednesday was the end of the road for 12 clubs with Marseille, Pafos, Union Saint-Gilloise, PSV, Athletic Club, Napoli, Copenhagen, Ajax, Eintracht Frankfurt, Slavia Prague, Villarreal and Kairat all seeing their European dreams come to an end.

    Advertisement

    The February playoffs draw will be held Friday at 6 a.m. ET.

    Champions League knockout round schedule

    Playoffs: Feb. 17-18 and 24-25
    Round of 16: March 10-11 and 17-18
    Quarterfinals: April 7-8 and 14-15
    Semi-finals: April 28-29 and May 5-6
    Final: May 30 (Puskás Aréna, Hungary)

    Here’s how Matchday 8 played out live on Wednesday:

    Live coverage is over79 updates
    • Yahoo Sports Staff

      Advanced to Round of 16

      1. Arsenal

      2. Bayern

      3. Liverpool

      4. Tottenham

      5. Barcelona

      6. Chelsea

      7. Sporting CP

      8. Manchester City

      Round of 16 playoff

      9. Real Madrid

      10. Inter

      11. PSG

      12. Newcastle

      13. Juventus

      14. Atlético Madrid

      15. Atalanta

      16. Leverkusen

      17. Dortmund

      18. Olympiacos

      19. Club Brugge

      20. Galatasaray

      21. Monaco

      22. Qarabag

      23. Bodø/Glimt

      24. Benfica

      Eliminated

      25. Marseille

      26. Pafos FC

      27. Union Saint-Gilloise

      28. PSV Eindhoven

      29. Athletic Club

      30. Napoli

      31. Copenhagen

      32. Ajax

      33. Frankfurt

      34. Slavia Prague

      35. Villarreal

      36. Kairat Almaty

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Sean Leahy

      Sean Leahy

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    • Yahoo Sports Staff

    Champions League Matchday 8 results

    FT: Ajax 1-2 Olympiacos
    FT: Arsenal 3-2 Kairat Almaty
    FT: Monaco 0-0 Juventus
    FT: Athletic Club 2-3 Sporting
    FT: Atlético Madrid 1-2 Bodø/Glimt
    FT: Barcelona 4-1 Copenhagen
    FT: Bayer Leverkusen 3-0 Villarreal
    FT: Benfica 4-2 Real Madrid
    FT: Borussia Dortmund 0-2 Inter Milan
    FT: Club Brugge 3-0 Marseille
    FT: Eintracht Frankfurt 0-2 Tottenham
    FT: Liverpool 6-0 Qarabağ
    FT: Manchester City 2-0 Galatasaray
    FT: Napoli 2-3 Chelsea
    FT: Pafos 4-1 Slavia Prague
    FT: PSG 1-1 Newcastle
    FT: PSV 1-2 Bayern Munich
    FT: Union St.-Gilloise 1-0 Atalanta

  • Bill Polian confirms he actually did vote for Bill Belichick for the Hall of Fame after uncertainty, controversy

    First came the shocking report that Bill Belichick didn’t make the cut for the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

    That report included sources telling ESPN that Bill Polian — a Hall of Fame voter and former rival of Belichick’s — led a campaign among voters that Belichick should have to “wait a year” for his Hall call, citing the New England Patriots’ Spygate and Deflategate scandals as justification.

    Advertisement

    Then, as fury swelled, came the denial. In the hours after the news broke Tuesday, Polian “categorically” denied the report’s portrayal of his stance and insisted that he voted for Belichick. Here’s what he told Sports Illustrated’s Matt Verderame:

    “That’s totally and categorically untrue,” Polian told Verderame of the ESPN report. “I voted for him.”

    Then, a few hours later, came the backtrack. Well, the first backtrack.

    Bill Polian changes his story

    ESPN’s Don Van Natta Jr., who broke the initial news with his colleague Seth Wickersham, spoke with Polian in the aftermath of their story. It turns out that Polian’s not so sure whether or not he actually voted for Belichick. Though he can say with certainty that he did vote for Patriots owner Robert Kraft.

    Advertisement

    And he acknowledged the existence of a campaign to make Belichick wait. But it wasn’t his idea.

    Here’s that breakdown in Van Natta’s and Wickersham’s words:

    In an interview with ESPN on Tuesday night, Polian denied telling fellow voters that Belichick should serve a one-year penance for Spygate. But he said he heard his fellow voters “float that idea” but he insisted he didn’t agree or disagree with the proposal.

    Polian said he voted for Kraft and even spoke up on his behalf during the deliberations, saying Kraft had no knowledge of the Spygate scheme. Polian added that he could not remember with 100% certainty if he voted for Belichick, saying he was 95% sure he voted for the coach and a player, “most likely” L.C. Greenwood.

    OK then.

    Bill Polian isn't certain whether or not he voted for Bill Belichick for the Hall of Fame.

    Bill Polian isn’t certain whether or not he voted for Bill Belichick for the Hall of Fame.

    (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

    Bill Polian changes his story, again

    Then on Wednesday, Polian read a written statement on SiriusXM NFL Radio confirming that he did in fact vote for Belichick and that it was confirmed by the Hall of Fame.

    “I voted for coach Bleichick int he Hall of Fame selection meeting,” he said. “The Pro Football Hall of Fame has confirmed that fact through the auditors of the selection process. Again, I’ll state that I never said that I believe that coach Belichick should “wait a year” for enshrinement. This has been confirmed by the Pr Football Hall of Fame, numerous selectors who were in the room, and my vote for coach Belichick.

    “As a Hall of Fame member and selector, I realize the import of what we do. I’ve always tried as a selector to make these difficult choices with the utmost of objectivity.”

    While he settled on his “yes” vote, at least for now, Polian’s back-and-forth only adds more fuel to a fire that’s been raging in NFL circles and on social media since the story of Belichick’s snub broke. People want to know who among Hall of Fame voters denied Belichick his first-ballot induction. And they want to know now.

    Advertisement

    Those answers aren’t readily available. But Polian put himself at the center of the storm as former players, fans and even Hall of Fame voters expressed dismay at Belichick not getting in despite contributing to eight Super Bowl-winning teams, six of them as the head coach of the Patriots.

    Polian is one of 50 voters on this year’s Hall of Fame voting panel. Election to the Hall of Fame requires 40 of those 50 voters to cast a yes ballot, meaning that at least 11 voters voted against Belichick’s enshrinement.

    Polian, apparently, isn’t among those “no” votes after all.

    Bill Polian’s long history with Belichick’s Patriots

    What is known about Polian is that he spent 12 seasons as the general manager and president of the Indianapolis Colts from 1998-2009. That spanned almost the entirety of the Peyton Manning era that produced repeated deep playoff runs and a Super Bowl championship after the 2006 season.

    Advertisement

    The Colts’ chief rivals during that span were Belichick’s Patriots. And the Patriots got the best of them. While the Colts won one Super Bowl during Polian’s tenure, the Patriots won three. The teams played repeated high-stakes games in the regular season and playoffs in what’s widely considered one of the great rivalries in NFL history.

    Polian pushed rule change after high-stakes loss to Patriots

    One of those games was the 2003 AFC championship, in which the Patriots beat the Colts 24-14 en route to their second of three Super Bowl championships in four years. Manning thew four interceptions that day. And the Colts believed that officials allowed the Patriots to get away with repeated instances of contact and defensive holding.

    Per an NBC report from 2005, Polian “clearly was seething after the game.” And as a member of the NFL’s competition committee, he helped push through changes that directed game officials to more closely enforce rules barring certain types of defensive contact with receivers more than 5 yards downfield.

    Advertisement

    This became known in New England as the “Ty Law rule,” named after the famously physical and aggressive Patriots cornerback who intercepted Manning three times in that 2003 AFC championship. And it’s credited with dramatically changing how NFL officials call physical play in the secondary.

    Per NBC, officials made 191 defensive illegal-contact in the 2004 regular season compared to 79 in the 2003 season prior to the Colts-Patriots championship game.

    What about Spygate, Deflategate?

    This was all before the Spygate and Deflategate scandals that were referenced in Tuesday’s ESPN report.

    Advertisement

    Spygate took place during Polian’s tenure in 2007. It didn’t directly involve the Colts. Deflategate, meanwhile, came after Polian’s final 2009 season running the Colts’ front office. But it revolved around New England’s 45-7 win over the Colts in the 2014 AFC championship game in which the Patriots were found to have illegally used under-inflated balls, allegedly to their advantage.

    And it sounds from ESPN’s report that Polian remains bitter about both.

    Does any of this confirm that Polian pushed the agenda to make Belichick wait or is one of the 11-plus voters who didn’t vote for him? No. And he insisted that wasn’t the case again on Wednesday.

    But Polian isn’t doing himself any favors with his explanations.

  • Tarik Skubal vs. the Tigers: What the arbitration process means for the ace, the team and future arb cases

    It’s late January, many MLB stadiums are submerged in snow, and Opening Day is two months away. Yet the best pitcher on Earth is actively trying to make history.

    Tarik Skubal, the back-to-back American League Cy Young Award winner, is currently embroiled in a fascinating contract dispute with his employer, the Detroit Tigers. The 29-year-old hurler wants $32 million. The team would prefer to pay him $19 million. And while Skubal’s true, open-market value is closer to, and likely even beyond, the former number, MLB’s pre-free-agency salary scale caps his earning potential and complicates the conversation.

    Advertisement

    When he hits free agency at the end of 2026, Skubal will command a staggering sum. He is just the 12th pitcher in MLB history to win a Cy Young in consecutive seasons. Since the start of 2024, Skubal’s 2.30 ERA is a third of a run lower than the next-lowest qualified tally (Zack Wheeler at 2.63). Only two other players (Cristopher Sánchez and Hunter Brown) are even under 3.00. Over that span, Skubal has the second-highest strikeout rate (31.2%) and third-lowest walk rate (4.5%) among qualified starters. No matter how you crunch the numbers, his greatness is difficult to debate.

    But in the cattywampus world of MLB arbitration, debate is exactly what will happen.

    To understand why Skubal’s situation is so noteworthy, one must first understand the convoluted world of “arb.” Here’s an oversimplified overview.

    Advertisement

    When a player steps onto the diamond to make his MLB debut, he simultaneously starts a clock for control of his services. Depending on when in the season he debuts, a player is under team control for either six or seven seasons. For those first three seasons, big leaguers make the league minimum or close to it. There are various ways they can increase their earnings, but let’s not get trapped in the weeds here.

    Entering Years 4, 5 and 6 in the majors, players gain eligibility for salary arbitration, a process that about 150 players go through each winter. In arbitration, agents negotiate salaries on players’ behalf until an early-January deadline. At that point, most players agree to terms with their clubs. The handful who don’t hurdle toward a hearing, with both the player and the team filing a salary number with the league office. After that, the two sides are permitted to continue discussing terms. However, some organizations maintain a policy referred to as “file-and-trial,” which, well, you’re probably smart enough to figure that out.

    The arbitration hearing itself, usually conducted in late January or early February, is a bizarre, outdated ritual of corporate theater. In a nondescript hotel conference center or rented boardroom, representatives for the two parties state their cases in front of a three-person panel of independent arbitrators. That trio listens to the arguments from both sides and decides whether the player is worth a dollar above or a dollar below the financial midpoint. The result: The player is paid either his proposed sum or the team’s proposed sum. There is no in-between, no splitting the difference.

     [Get more Detroit news: Tigers team feed

    That means unless Skubal and the Tigers find common ground ahead of their hearing date, the ace’s 2026 contract will be either $19 million or $32 million. To be clear, both of those sums are livable wages. Skubal will be able to splurge for guac on his burrito bowl no matter what. But the difference is staggering.

    Advertisement

    And the prevailing opinion around the industry is that Skubal and the Tigers will not settle before their hearing. Detroit is a file-and-trial team, though it made an exception last winter with hurler Casey Mize. Then again, the financial disparity in that circumstance — $25,000 — was relative peanuts compared to where things stand with Skubal.

    His case’s $13 million gap, the largest ever in arbitration, is almost certainly unbridgeable. Skubal and his team are arguing from different ideological paradigms. A few phone calls between Tigers president of baseball operations Scott Harris and Skubal’s agent, Scott Boras, can’t untangle that reality.

    Typically, final decisions rely entirely on comparables from the arbitration process, with judges comparing the player in question to players from previous seasons of a similar ilk, skill set and tenure. However, a rarely used clause in the collective bargaining agreement that allows players with “special accomplishments” to compare themselves to all players — not just previous arbitration-eligible players — likely emboldened Skubal and Boras to file such a large figure. It’s a huge ask, but Skubal’s back-to-back Cy Youngs would certainly qualify as “special accomplishments.”

    Advertisement

    Skubal’s aggressive filing makes this case something of a toss-up, as a $32 million salary would break Juan Soto’s record for the highest salary ever for an arbitration-eligible player, at $31 million. The current record for a third-year-arb pitcher salary is $19.75 million, which, coincidentally, was given out by the Tigers to David Price in 2015. Accounting for inflation and Skubal’s superior track record, Detroit’s $19 million filing this go-around looks like a massive underpay.

    Crucially, arbitration cases are based on a player’s previous year salary. Skubal made $10 million last season. A jump to $32 million would be, far and away, the largest year-over-year raise for a starter in arbitration history. That record is currently held by Jacob deGrom, who went from $7.4 million to $17 million in his final year of arbitration after winning the 2018 Cy Young. Through this lens, the arbitrators siding with Skubal would represent an enormous break from precedent.

    Had the Tigers filed a few million higher or Skubal a few million lower, it might be easier to pick a winner. Obviously, that’s not what happened. The result is a $13 million mystery box.

    Will this situation have a discernible impact on Skubal’s future in the Motor City? It’s possible, but not likely. Sometimes arbitration hearings foster bad blood between a player and a team; Corbin Burnes and the Brewers are a notable example. That’s understandable, considering the team is spending time, resources and energy to craft an argument centered on a player’s flaws.

    Advertisement

    But usually, money fixes everything. Star first baseman Vladimir Guerrero Jr. and the Toronto Blue Jays went to a hearing before the 2024 season. Guerrero signed a 14-year, $500 million contract with Toronto the next year.

    Barring injury, Skubal will enter free agency next winter and sign with whichever team offers him the biggest bag of riches. The outcome of his arbitration hearing won’t change that. That doesn’t mean Skubal vs. Detroit is important to only Skubal and Detroit.

    If Skubal wins, it could dramatically alter future arbitration cases for frontline starters. For instance, Paul Skenes, the 2025 NL Cy Young winner, will enter his first year of arb next winter. How the judges rule on Skubal’s situation will surely impact how Skenes’ arbitration plays out. Both players are also on the MLB Players Association executive subcommittee, an eight-player group heavily involved in labor negotiations. Because Major League Baseball’s Labor Relations Department plays a large role in helping craft teams’ decisions ahead of arbitration, one could view Skubal’s face-off with Detroit as part of the larger discord between league and union.

    Advertisement

    But the most tangible upshot of Skubal’s upcoming hearing is how it has left Detroit’s offseason in a total holding pattern. Multiple Yahoo Sports sources believe the Tigers are waiting to learn if Skubal will earn $19 million or $32 million this year before deciding whether to make additional expenditures this winter. That dynamic helps explain why Detroit, one win away from the ALCS last fall, has undertaken such an underwhelming offseason.

    The Tigers extended a qualifying offer (one-year, $22.025 million) to second baseman Gleyber Torres, who accepted. Harris and Co. also re-signed reliever Kyle Finnegan to a two-year deal and added legendary closer Kenley Jansen and Drew Anderson, a former Phillies prospect coming off a stellar year in South Korea, on one-year contracts. Even in the transactionally inactive AL Central, that’s an unsatisfying haul.

    A handful of free agents remain available — starters Zac Gallen and Lucas Giolito, third baseman Eugenio Suárez — and would be significant upgrades for a Detroit team that should be going full-throttle in what might very well be Skubal’s last year in town. Unfortunately, there’s a good chance the moment has passed, with so many of the impact free agents having already signed with new teams.

    Detroit’s organization remains in a healthy place. The Tigers — who appeared to be running away with the division in 2025 before a late-summer collapse — boast a quality batch of young position players, a dynamite bullpen and one of the better farm systems in baseball.

    Advertisement

    And for all the drama swirling around his future, Skubal is still on the roster. No matter how his arbitration case turns out, no matter the price attached to his name, the Tigers should be more aggressive in crafting an unimpeachable roster around their generational talent. Detroit tumbled out of October the past two seasons despite a slew of iconic Skubal outings because the lineup wasn’t good enough.

    Finding a way to upgrade that unit while Skubal is still around feels like a worthwhile course of action either way.

  • Malik Tillman shines for Leverkusen as Americans help shape Champions League race

    The U.S. men’s national team’s mark of progress is found not only with players on clubs competing in the UEFA Champions League but with them filling key roles in Europe’s top competition.

    Featuring 18 matches kicking off simultaneously across the continent Wednesday, the dizzying final day of the 2025-26 league stage brought a two-goal performance from Bayer Leverkusen’s Malik Tillman and starting assignments for five other Americans.

    Advertisement

    With places in the knockout stage hanging in the balance, five clubs employing U.S. World Cup roster candidates secured passage to the last 24 while two were knocked out.

    None finished in the top eight, which would’ve earned a bye directly to the Round of 16. Tillman, Weston McKennie (Juventus), Johnny Cardoso (Atlético Madrid), Yunus Musah (Atalanta) and Folarin Balogun (Monaco) will compete in two-leg playoffs Feb. 17-18 and 24-25.

    The bracket is partially set ahead of Friday’s draw.

    Sergiño Dest (PSV Eindhoven) and Tim Weah (Olympique Marseille) were eliminated — the latter’s club on goal differential when Anatoliy Trubin, Benfica’s goalkeeper, headed in a free kick near the end of stoppage time for a 4-2 home victory over Real Madrid.

    Had that match ended 3-2, Weah’s Marseille would’ve gone through. The French team had only itself to blame, though, after losing in Belgium to Club Brugge 3-0. In his sixth Champions League start, Weah played 90 minutes.

    Advertisement

    The brightest performance came from Tillman, the 23-year-old attacking midfielder making his fifth Champions League start of the eight-game campaign. He charged Bayer Leverkusen’s 3-0 home victory over Villarreal with a sterling first half.

    Using high pressure in the 12th minute, he pursued goalkeeper Arnau Tenas into the 6-yard box and deflected the attempted clearance into the net. Twenty-three minutes later, Tillman smashed in a wicked half-volley from the top of the penalty area.

    The goals were his first in the Champions League since November 2024, when, while with PSV Eindhoven, he scored twice against Shakhtar Donetsk and once against Girona.

    Tillman’s standing with the national team has dipped and risen since coach Mauricio Pochettino took the helm in October 2024. Last summer, his stock rose at the Concacaf Gold Cup with three goals and two assists in six starts for the runner-up Americans.

    Advertisement

    In the only match pitting Americans against each other Wednesday, McKennie and Balogun went the distance during a 0-0 draw.

    Of late, both players had been sensational in the Champions League. McKennie’s streak of goals in three consecutive matches ended Wednesday, and Balogun had scored in three straight before hitting a two-game drought.

    Dest played 90 minutes for PSV, whose 2-1 home loss to second-place Bayern Munich sent it tumbling to 28th place and out of the competition.

    In his first Champions League start in more than four months, Musah was replaced seven minutes into the second half as part of a triple switch during a 1-0 loss at Belgium’s Union Saint-Gilloise.

    Advertisement

    Cardoso was the only U.S. player who didn’t start. In his third Champions League appearance of the season, he entered in the 64th minute of a 2-1 home loss to Norway’s Bodø/Glimt.

    Thursday in the second-tier Europa League, U.S. midfielder Tanner Tessmann and first-place Olympique Lyonnais will attempt to clinch the top seed in the knockout stage when the French club hosts Greece’s PAOK.

    Center back Auston Trusty and Celtic are clinging to the 24th and final place in the next round ahead of its critical finale at home against Dutch side Utrecht.

  • The Bill Belichick Hall of Fame fiasco gives Patriots owner Robert Kraft a potential shot to heal a deep rift

    In August of 2019, Bill Belichick took his New England Patriots on a detour.

    Having arrived in Canton, Ohio to attend the Pro Football Hall of Fame enshrinement of former Patriots cornerback Ty Law, Belichick combed over the Hall’s historic collections for the better part of an entire weekend. He studied exhibits, archives and videos, spending hours in between with staff asking and answering questions. He then wandered through a vast expanse of bronze busts and plaques telling the story of how football has been shaped over more than a century.

    Advertisement

    That same visit, Belichick shared his Canton love affair with his football team, bringing his players and staff in for a tour before heading to meet the Detroit Lions for a joint practice.

    These were the kind of pilgrimages Belichick made during his youth, when he’d visit the Hall of Fame with his father, Steve, a former player, coach and scout who imparted upon Bill a granular reverence for football. Steve is in those HOF archives, written into history by virtue of one season with the Lions as a fullback in 1941. Someday, Bill will be enshrined among those busts, too.

    As we have learned this week, that bust reportedly won’t be going up this summer. Belichick inexplicably missed the HOF cut on his first ballot appearance, failing to attain the necessary 40 of 50 votes for enshrinement. That means if Patriots owner Robert Kraft gets his much coveted “door knock” next week in Santa Clara, California, informing him of his entrance into the Hall, it will be an honor that came at the expense of leaving Belichick’s doorway silent.

    Kraft may be in. Belichick apparently isn’t. And that could end up depriving both of one last jointly shared football victory. It’s a moment that, frankly, might have been able to douse the smoldering mess between them and heal some wounds. Now it threatens to become the deepest cut, with Kraft potentially going into the Hall of Fame ahead of Belichick and quarterback Tom Brady, the two biggest football architects of a shared Patriots dynasty.

    Advertisement

    That is, if Kraft wants it to go this way.

    [Get more Patriots news: New England team feed]

    In reality, he may end up with a monumentally unfair opportunity at extending an extraordinary olive branch here. Not one that he asked for and not one that he should be burdened with. Certainly not one that anyone in football should expect. But it’s there nonetheless: If the Hall of Fame beckons him next week, Kraft could accept the honor, but decline his enshrinement until he and Belichick can enter together.

    It would be an unprecedented moment in NFL history, of course. And also completely implausible and preposterous considering the rift that has developed between Kraft and Belichick. Not to mention an act of pure grace that would be cleaning up a vote that is being admonished by a multitude of HOF selectors.

    East Rutherford, NJ - November 26: New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick shakes hands with owner Robert Kraft before the game. The Patriots lost to the New York Giants, 10-7. (Photo by Matthew J. Lee/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

    Robert Kraft on Bill Belichick: “Whatever perceptions may exist about any personal differences between Bill and me, I strongly believe Bill Belichick’s record and body of work speak for themselves.” (Photo by Matthew J. Lee/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

    (Boston Globe via Getty Images)

    It would also be remarkable. To the point of elevating Kraft in a way that wins and trophies can’t.

    Advertisement

    It’s not often we see NFL team owners deprive themselves of something they want. If anything, it’s the opposite, with their riches punctuated by superyachts, palatial homes, private jets, political influence, powerful friends and so many other lavish trappings of billionaire wealth. And to be fair, some extremely generous philanthropy, too. Kraft is among the league’s elite when it comes to giving, reportedly to nearly the tune of a billion dollars spread among multiple charities, foundations, causes and other well-intentioned pursuits. But league history has never seen a Hall of Fame candidate hit the pause button when presented with football immortality. It simply doesn’t happen. And if that’s not the kind of gesture from Kraft that could repair a rift with Belichick, one that was created and instigated by both men, then there isn’t a meaningful peace to be had between the two.

    For his part, Kraft hasn’t remained silent on Belichick’s snub, telling the Associated Press on Wednesday that Belichick “unequivocally” deserved to be elected in this class.

    “Whatever perceptions may exist about any personal differences between Bill and me, I strongly believe Bill Belichick’s record and body of work speak for themselves,” Kraft said. “As head coach of the New England Patriots for more than two decades, he set the standard for on-field excellence, preparation, and sustained success in the free agency and salary cap era of the National Football League. He is the greatest coach of all time and he unequivocally deserves to be a unanimous first-ballot Pro Football Hall of Famer.”

    Brady, who has also had some chilly moments with Belichick, echoed the sentiments during an appearance on Seattle sports radio, telling the “Brock & Salk” show that “no coach” should be a first-ballot Hall of Famer if Belichick isn’t.

    Advertisement

    “I don’t understand it,” Brady said Wednesday. “I was with him every day. If he’s not a first ballot Hall of Famer, there’s really no coach that ever should be a first-ballot Hall of Famer. Which is completely ridiculous because people deserve it. He’s incredible. There’s no coach I’d rather play for.”

    “In the end, he’s going to get into the Hall of Fame,” Brady added. “I’m not worried about that. A lot of times in life — for all of life, for all of us, things don’t happen exactly how you want them or on your timeline. We’ll all be there to celebrate him when it does happen and he’s going to have a huge turnout from so many players, coaches, that appreciate everything that he did, and the commitment that he made to winning, and the impact that he had on our lives.”

    While it means something to have Kraft and Brady endorse him, it would have been more meaningful to see the coach and franchise owner enter into the Hall of Fame together. Not for the gawking at potential awkwardness between them, but to memorialize what they achieved together. And to give each of them a moment to once again share an honor that is theirs individually but also collectively. To put on gold jackets that they earned for each other.

    Whether Kraft gets in first or not, that’s a celebration they can still have. And maybe the squashing of differences comes through the passage of time and the opportunity to pay tribute to each other. First with Kraft honoring Belichick in his speech and then next with the team owner welcoming Belichick into the Hall of Fame next year. And then, in 2028, with both men welcoming Brady together.

    Advertisement

    Given how much Kraft has wanted this honor, that’s likely the way this will go — with Kraft getting in and then advocating for voters to fix the mistake they made with Belichick. But there’s still a chance here for him to elevate himself in league and football history that would be unprecedented.

    If he has the votes for entry, Kraft pausing his own enshrinement might be the gesture that meaningfully and forever repairs his relationship with Belichick. A forever moment for both — and for the Patriots — that’s worth the wait.

  • 6 Biggest playoff takeaways for 2026 fantasy season + Dynasty Debates: Buy LOW + Sell HIGH players

    Subscribe to Yahoo Fantasy Forecast

    Matt Harmon and Justin Boone are back for another episode of the pod and to remind you that what happens in the NFL postseason matters for the 2026 fantasy season. The two share their biggest takeaways from the postseason that matter for the upcoming fantasy season. Harmon and Boone also dive into the fantasy mailbag to answer all your ‘Dynasty Debate’ questions.

    (3:00) – Pod programming note: Yahoo Fantasy Forecast is going to the Super Bowl

    Advertisement

    (6:15) 6 Playoff Takeaways for 2026 Fantasy Season

    (38:40) Dynasty Debates Pt. 1

    (49:30) Dynasty Debates Pt. 2

    Matt Harmon and Justin Boone are back for another episode of the pod and to remind you that what happens in the NFL postseason matters for the 2026 fantasy season. The two share their biggest takeaways from the postseason that matter for the upcoming fantasy season. Harmon and Boone also dive into the fantasy mailbag to answer all your 'Dynasty Debate' questions.

    Matt Harmon and Justin Boone are back for another episode of the pod and to remind you that what happens in the NFL postseason matters for the 2026 fantasy season. The two share their biggest takeaways from the postseason that matter for the upcoming fantasy season. Harmon and Boone also dive into the fantasy mailbag to answer all your ‘Dynasty Debate’ questions.

    (Jason Jung)

    🖥️ Watch this full episode on YouTube

    Check out the rest of the Yahoo Sports podcast family at https://apple.co/3zEuTQj or at yahoosports.tv

  • Browns hire Todd Monken + State of the NFC South & 2026 Draft lookahead (ft. J.J. Jansen & Austin Mock)

    Subscribe to Inside Coverage

    How will Todd Monken boost the Cleveland Browns in the offseason as their new head coach? Yahoo Sports’ Andrew Siciliano is joined by Carolina Panthers long snapper J.J. Jansen, and The Athletic’s Austink Monk join the show to talk all things coaching cycle, Hall of Fame eligibility, Super Bowl and more! Check out today’s episode to get caught up the latest news and notes from around the league.

    Advertisement

    (6:30) – HOF talk: Belichick & Luke Kuechly

    (17:50) – Browns hire HC Todd Monken

    (22:50) – JJ Jansen on Panthers’ 2026 outlook

    (30:40) – Early Super Bowl thoughts

    (48:00) – Austin Mock’s 2026 NFL Draft big board

    (54:50) – Latest coaching cycle news

    🖥️ Watch this full episode on YouTube

    Check out the rest of the Yahoo Sports podcast family at https://apple.co/3zEuTQj or at Yahoo Sports Podcasts

  • LeBron James scores 11 points in what could be his final game in Cleveland, as Cavs throttle Lakers

    LeBron James scored 11 points Wednesday night in a 129-99 loss to the Cavaliers in what could be his final game in Cleveland, where the Akron native spent a total of 11 seasons across two stints earlier in his legendary career.

    The Cavaliers (29-20) reportedly would welcome James back for a third go-round next season, that is, if the 41-year-old wants to keep playing. He’s currently in a contract year in his record-setting 23rd NBA season, including his eighth straight for the Lakers (28-18).

    Advertisement

    The night began with a chorus of cheers when James was introduced as the final player in the Lakers’ starting five and then featured a chalk toss from the 21-time All-Star just before tip-off. The Cavs also honored James with a midgame tribute video.

    Cleveland, notably playing without reigning NBA Defensive Player of the Year Evan Mobley, was ignited by the jump-shooting of Jaylon Tyson, the paint work of Jarrett Allen and the all-around effort of Donovan Mitchell. Those three scored 20, 17 and 25 points, respectively.

    As for James, it didn’t take long for him to get on the board. The Lakers came in averaging 14.3 fast-break points per game but scored eight of those in the first quarter.

    Advertisement

    Coming off his second game this season with at least 45 points and 12 assists, Luka Dončić set the tone in transition, finding James with throw-ahead passes for back-to-back buckets.

    But then, a bit more than four minutes into the game, Dončić had an injury scare. While watching his 3-point attempt fly through the air and then bounce off the rim, he scooted back on one foot, his left one.

    Dončić went too far, dropping off the edge of Rocket Arena’s elevated court, where the five-time All-NBA first-teamer then sat in discomfort as play continued. He received medical attention during the following Lakers timeout prior to limping to the locker room.

    Dončić checked back in with 1:32 left in the frame and made a pair of free throws to help L.A. take a 28-24 lead into the second quarter. He finished with 29 points and six assists while shooting 12 of 20 from the field in just three quarters of action, as he rested in the fourth.

    Advertisement

    Allen matched his season averages with 13 points and eight rebounds in the first half. Two of those points came on an alley-oop dunk served by Tyson, who already had three 3s by intermission.

    Cleveland began the third quarter 7 of 8 from the field, stretching its lead to 76-63. Tyson dished a behind-the-head pass to Allen, who finished at the cup with a left-handed layup. Mitchell hit back-to-back 3s, then hung in the air to deliver a bounce pass to Dean Wade for the first of his two triples early in the frame.

    Tyson gave a national audience a look inside his bag during the second half. To complement his outside shooting, he attacked the rim. Following up on an and-1 floater earlier in the third quarter, he drove baseline and dropped in a one-handed dunk.

    Advertisement

    Ultimately, after a trio of De’Andre Hunter 3s, the Cavaliers closed the third quarter having outscored the Lakers 42-22.

    Cleveland cruised to victory in the fourth, during which James appeared to roll his left ankle while landing on the foot of Lonzo Ball on his way down from a field-goal attempt.

    James remained in the game but had little impact. With 8:23 to go and L.A. trailing by 28 points, Bronny James took the court. He slammed home a one-handed jam off a steal late in the blowout and then added two 3-pointers soon after, giving him eight points.

    LeBron James was previously 9-3 as a visitor in Cleveland. And in his 24 prior games against the Cavaliers, he had averaged 28.1 points, 7.2 rebounds and 7.1 assists.

    Advertisement

    He didn’t have his best stuff in this homecoming, but he felt all the emotions and cracked a smile when his son threw down a highlight-reel dunk on the break to the tune of a celebratory crowd in an arena the four-time league MVP and four-time NBA champion started building his legacy.

  • Hall of Fame voter explains why he didn’t vote for Bill Belichick, and it has nothing to do with Spygate

    In a room of 50 Pro Football Hall of Fame voters, at least 11 of them voted against enshrining Bill Belichick, the NFL’s all-time leader in Super Bowl titles among head coaches.

    The first of them came forward Wednesday, a day after news broke that the New England Patriots legend had missed out on making the Hall. That would be Kansas City Star columnist Vahe Gregorian, the representative of the Kansas City Chiefs media contingent.

    Advertisement

    In a column published at the Star, Gregorian explained his reasons for not supporting Belichick. And they had nothing to do with Spygate and Deflategate, the scandals that have been widely reported to be a major reason for Belichick’s exclusion.

    Hall of Fame voter thinks Bill Belichick belongs in the Hall of Fame, but didn’t vote for him

    From the beginning, Gregorian says he actually does think Belichick belongs in the Hall of Fame.

    To be fair, some other anti-Belichick voters might agree. It was initially suggested in the ESPN article breaking the news that Belichick missed out on the honor because some felt he should simply have to wait a year as penance for his cheating scandals. However, Gregorian said the matter of Spygate and Deflategate didn’t affect his vote at all:

    ESPN’s piece heavily suggests that Deflategate and Spygate and “politics” led to this situation, and it quotes a veteran Hall voter as saying, “The only explanation (for the outcome) was the cheating stuff. It really bothered some of the guys.”

    Perhaps that affected some voters, perhaps not. I can’t and won’t try to speak for others, and it’s a condition of being a voter to not divulge the deliberations.

    But the so-called “cheating stuff” is not at all the only possible explanation. Because it certainly didn’t ultimately influence my vote.

    So why didn’t Gregorian vote for Belichick?

    Advertisement

    He said he simply had other people he was worrying about making the Hall, with too few votes to go around. Some thought this might be the case.

    You can learn more about the matter here, but the situation breaks down as Belichick being one of five non-modern player candidates up for a vote. The other four were Patriots owner Robert Kraft, in the contributor category, and three senior player candidates: Ken Anderson, Roger Craig and L.C. Greenwood.

    The rub for Gregorian and other voters was that due to recently instituted Hall of Fame rules, voters could only vote for, at most, three of those five, creating a situation where five men each needed 40 votes from a room where there were only 150 total votes to go around.

    Obviously, Belichick had a strong case to receive a full third of those votes.

    New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick walks on the field before an NFL football game against the Buffalo Bills Sunday, Sept. 20, 2015, in Orchard Park, N.Y. (AP Photo/Bill Wippert)

    We’re slowly learning why Bill Belichick wasn’t voted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame. (AP Photo/Bill Wippert)

    (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

    The way Gregorian puts it, he was much more concerned about the trio of senior players, whom he said have been “snubbed for decades” and might not get another chance at the ballot due to a backlog of senior players. So he voted for the three players, with the assumption that Belichick will be back next year and they won’t:

    All of that went into why I felt duty-bound to vote for the richly deserving seniors, who most likely won’t ever have a hearing again as more senior candidates enter the pool and fresh cases get made for others.

    Meanwhile, Belichick is inevitable soon … as he should be. At the risk of contradicting my own vote, really, he shouldn’t even have to wait. I understand why people are offended that he isn’t going in the first moment he can.

    In the end, though, I felt more compelled by what I perceive to be last chances and looming lost causes within the system as we have it — a system I hope the Hall will see fit to change now.

    It’s not quite that simple, though. Belichick sure seems like a lock to make it next year, especially after this firestorm, but that will be at the expense of another contributor and set of senior players. Pushing back Belichick in favor of Anderson, Craig and Greenwood simply kicks the can down the road.

    Advertisement

    Gregorian’s reasoning reflects a critical issue with the new Hall of Fame voting, in which voters don’t vote “yes” or “no” on a candidate so much as “this guy” or “that guy.” He’s not alone in having an issue.

    Some Bill Belichick voters agree Hall of Fame voting needs fixing

    Among the voters who have publicly confirmed they voted for Belichick, several of them have made very clear they aren’t happy with any of this.

    Some of them are annoyed the result got leaked. Some of them are understandably annoyed about being harassed for something their colleagues did. And some of them are annoyed with the new rules that created this situation.

    Advertisement

    A sample of the latter:

    Ultimately, Belichick’s snub has said far more about the Hall of Fame than Belichick’s legacy. It’s hard to imagine this isn’t going to cause the Hall to re-evaluate its rules when it comes to coaches.

    For now, though, the people will rage.

    Some voters definitely went against Belichick due to Spygate

    While Gregorian had his reasons, it should be noted there were definitely voters who voted against Belichick due to Spygate. We simply haven’t had any of them come forward yet.

    As one account from the room laid out, “Spygate was the reason several selectors could not bring themselves to vote for Belichick, because they felt it sullied his records.” That lines up with ESPN’s initial reporting, though voter Bill Polian has denied leading that charge.

    Advertisement

    Clearly, there were multiple reasons to go against Belichick. Most observers just don’t think they are good reasons. Some have even speculated there might have been some grudges against Belichick in the room, though rejecting him out of revenge for being grumpy with the media would be spectacularly self-defeating considering how much more heat is on the voters right now.