Christian Polanco and Christine Cupo kick things off by tiering the Champions League field, separating the favorites from the contenders, dark horses, and pretenders. Who’s built to go the distance, which clubs are being overrated, and who could surprise Europe this season?
Advertisement
Next, the guys react to Anthony Gordon’s recent comments throwing shade at the Premier League. Has the league’s dominance made it predictable and boring, or is this just another case of fans confusing quality with excitement? Christian and Christine debate whether the “best league in the world” label still holds up.
Finally, the conversation turns to the USWNT as Emma Hayes officially ushers in a new era. With a clear vision, fresh energy, and evolving tactics, the guys ask whether this team could reach an even higher level of dominance than previous generations.
Timestamps:
(4:30) – Recapping Champions League Matchday 8 excitement
Advertisement
(9:00) – Listing Champions League Pretenders
(19:30) – Champions League contenders
(28:30) – Champions League favorites
(31:00) – Reacting to Anthony Gordon’s comments on PL’s lost excitement
In a jam-packed Kevin O’Connor show, KOC analyzes the first trade of the deadline week and what it means for Keon Ellis, the Cleveland Cavaliers and the Sacramento Kings. Then, he discusses updates in the Ja Morant trade market: is there a new interest in him coming out of Chicago?
Advertisement
Next, Kyle Neubeck joins to talk Sixers: what’s up with the Paul George suspension? Is Joel Embiid back? Is a trade for Giannis Antetokounmpo without giving up VJ Edgecombe a possibility?
Later, KOC chats All-Star reserves before being joined by Kirk Henderson. They look back at the Luka Doncic to Los Angeles trade one year later, marvel at Cooper Flagg’s 2-game tear and ask the question: will Anthony Davis be traded this season?
Corey Tulaba then joins the pod for this week’s Draft Class to chat AJ Dybantsa and Darryn Peterson, the future of Richie Saunders and the biggest college games to watch for this weekend.
(0:25) Cavs trade for Ellis & Schroder (6:31) Bulls interested in Ja Morant? (8:22) Kyle Neubeck talks 76ers (27:27) All-Star reserves announced (30:48) Kirk Henderson talks Mavericks (46:01) Hornets win 6 straight games (1:00:00) Draft Class with Corey Tulaba
PHOENIX, ARIZONA – JANUARY 02: Keon Ellis #23 of the Sacramento Kings dribbles the ball during the first half against the Phoenix Suns at Mortgage Matchup Center on January 02, 2026 in Phoenix, Arizona. The Suns defeated the Kings 129-102. (Photo by Chris Coduto/Getty Images)
[This story contains major spoilers from the season three finale of The Night Agent.]
Peter Sutherland (Gabriel Basso) may now be taking a leave of absence from being the titular Night Agent. But naturally, he will not be able to resist being away from the action for very long.
In the third season of Netflix’s hit spy action thriller, after making a deal with the devil, intelligence broker Jacob Monroe (Louis Herthum), to thwart a terrorist attack on the UN at the end of season two, Peter found himself investigating a wider conspiracy involving the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a terrorist organization — and even the White House.
While grappling with the guilt of his past choices, Peter hunts down Jay Batra (Suraj Sharma), a junior FinCEN analyst accused of murdering his supervisor and stealing classified intelligence. After tracking Batra down in Istanbul, Peter discovers that the analyst is actually a whistleblower who uncovered a massive financial conspiracy involving Suspicious Activity Reports. These documents revealed that American shell companies, managed by Monroe, were used to launder money for the LFS terrorist organization responsible for downing a civilian airliner. As Peter shifts into a more protective role, he teams up with financial journalist Isabel De Leon (Genesis Rodriguez) — who is later revealed to be Monroe’s estranged daughter, born from a tragic CIA operation in the 1990s.
The conspiracy reaches the highest levels of government, specifically involving President Richard Hagan (Ward Horton) and First Lady Jenny Hagan (Jennifer Morrison). To secure her husband’s election, the future first lady struck a deal with Monroe to exchange laundered campaign funds for classified access to presidential daily briefs. When a White House butler involved in the scheme attempted to back out, he was killed in a confrontation orchestrated by Jenny to look like an assassination attempt. This web of corruption is finally exposed through Monroe’s secret hard drive, which was encrypted with a personal code known only to Isabel. Although the Hagans ultimately use a presidential pardon to escape legal consequences, their crimes are broadcast to the world by a corrupt banker, Freya Myers (Michaela Watkins).
In the aftermath of the scandal, Peter chooses to temporarily step away from Night Action to find the personal balance he has lacked since the series began. But at the end of the finale, FBI Deputy Director Aiden Mosley (Albert Jones) informs Peter that a potential new partner has already been selected for his next mission, leaving the door open for Peter to stage a return sooner rather than later.
In the wide-ranging chat below, creator and showrunner Shawn Ryan answers all of THR’s burning questions after the season three finale. He explains his controversial decision to not bring back Luciane Buchanan’s Rose Larkin, why he never saw Peter’s new connection with Isabel as anything more than platonic, how he decided which characters would live and which ones would die, and whether he thinks this show can survive without his male lead Basso: “There’s a lot of evolution for Peter that I’d want to explore before exploring the world without him.”
***
When we spoke last year, you mentioned that Peter found season one “logistically difficult but morally easy.” For season two, you wanted to maintain those same logistical challenges while making things more “morally difficult.” What intrigued you most about how Peter is continuing to wrestle with the morality of being a Night Agent in season three?
One of the things we discussed was the challenge of growing into leadership. The idea that he’s growing into the responsibility of that job; that he’s understanding the drawbacks and sacrifices that come with it. He’s still having difficulty balancing all the various aspects of his life, and that’s something in the writers room of season four that we’re currently working on and talking about. But as it relates to season three, he’s a little less naïve.
If you look at Breaking Bad, very famously, they talked about [Walter White] going from science teacher to Scarface over the arc of that show. [With Night Agent] we talk about a guy who begins the show answering the phone in the basement who gains more and more responsibility and has to live with the consequences of his decisions more and more. Season three in our overall series arc is about him embracing being a Night Agent, embracing those responsibilities, and still understanding that it’s not 100 percent a fulfilling life. There are aspects he’d like to figure out, but those things are for future seasons.
You also told me after season two that the last thing you would want to do is “manufacture crisis after crisis season after season” to keep Peter and Rose together. Peter talks about her in passing this season, but he almost has to shut off that part of his brain to avoid going down that road, because he knows that reaching out to her could put her in danger. Why did you decide against bringing Rose back this season? Was it purely a creative choice? Did it come down to scheduling?
No, listen, it wasn’t scheduling. It wasn’t that we were unhappy with Luciane in any way. She was wonderful. As we told that story in season two, it felt like an ending in that moment. I still have hopes and intentions that Rose isn’t done on our show. But we started off in the writers room with the idea of, “How would a Peter/Rose-centric season three work?” [We were] hitting some roadblocks and not getting to where we wanted to be. We asked, “Well, how would a Peter-centric season three without Rose work?” And ultimately, that was the most creative, satisfying thing.
Now, that leads to not my favorite [kinds of] conversations. I called up Luciane, and I explained [the situation]. She was really wonderful about it, and had a sense from how season two ended that this was a possibility. She has a very successful show on Apple [called Chief of War] that I know she’s really proud of. I was clear to her on the phone call: “Listen, we’re actually intending to bring Chelsea [the Secret Service Agent played by Fola Evans-Akingbola] back in season three after she wasn’t in season two, other than one cameo scene near the end. This is the kind of show where people can drop out and come back in, and I really want to hold open the possibility that Rose will return in the right situation, and I hope you, Luciane, will be open to it.” She seemed to be [interested]. She can speak for herself, but we never want The Night Agent to become formulaic. We never want it to become repetitive.
One of the things I like so much about the show is that each new season is kind of a new world — has a lot of new characters, new storylines. With our flashbacks, you can always go back to moments with characters. So it was a creative decision I made that the studio and network supported, based on what we thought was creatively best for the show. We know there will be people who were very invested in Rose who will be disappointed. I understand that. I don’t blame them for feeling that way, but hopefully, when people see the season, they’ll understand what we did. I’m really proud of the third season, and I think the creative team did a fabulous job.
Genesis Rodriguez in The Night Agent season three.
Christopher Saunders/Netflix
You introduced Genesis Rodriguez as Isabel de Leon, a financial journalist who, as viewers learn midway through the season, is the estranged daughter of Jacob Monroe. When did you come up with that twist in the writers room, and how did you think about building up to that twist when you were creating the character?
I like to give a lot of credit to the writers room because so many of the great ideas on the show emanate from them and are presented to me. I will egotistically say for one second that what you’re talking about was my idea before the season began. (Laughs.) When I was thinking about season three and how we were going to wrap up the broker storyline, I thought about [Peter] meeting a woman who we didn’t know right away was [Monroe’s] daughter.
I didn’t have all the specifics, and in fact, those things were developed in collaboration with all the writers, [like] the journalist angle. I wanted to explore the financial world. I came into the season with a thesis statement that we put in the mouth of Isabel at one point — that all the horrible things that happened in the world couldn’t really happen without the cooperation and work of these financial institutions that hid their money and facilitated their illegal activities.
I was interested in humanizing Jacob Monroe. I think one of the things our show has done well over all three seasons is, we don’t have villains play pure villains. We see them as human beings. We understand their motivations; what drives them. And to give the writers room credit, they’re the ones who came up with and pitched me the idea of doing this extended flashback in episode seven in Mexico City, where we see the origin stories of the broker, how he came to meet Isabel’s mother, how the various levels of betrayal led him to his life now and to their estrangement.
There were some viewers who cynically believed that Isabel was replacing Rose as Peter’s love interest, but Peter and Isabel never crossed that line. Did you ever consider making them more than just friends and allies?
While the character of Rose isn’t in season three, the shadow of Rose hangs over a lot of season three. One of the things I fought for in the writers room was the idea that, as far as Peter was concerned, Rose wasn’t just disposable. It wasn’t just like, “Oh, well, we had a thing in those couple seasons, but now I’ll move on.” We wanted him to carry the weight of the sadness of that [relationship ending]. One of my favorite scenes in the season is in episode four, where he and Isabel are playing pool and asking each other questions, and he comes cleaner than he otherwise might [to someone else] about the weight of losing Rose and having to give her up.
Everyone loves a little romance, and the Peter/Rose romance was very successful, but we never viewed Isabel as a “replacement” for Rose. I think that would cheapen what Rose meant to Peter. Not that he can’t ever find love or romance again, but I just felt it was emotionally true to have him still carrying the weight of that lost relationship. So I don’t know if it was ever pitched or discussed, but if it was, we never seriously considered a romance. The things that they were involved in were too serious. The whole reason why [Peter and Rose] weren’t together was that it was too dangerous in his job. And to have another woman who’s romantically involved in danger, at least in season three, didn’t feel right to us.
Luciane Buchanan’s Rose Larkin with Basso in season two.
Christopher Saunders/Netflix
This season, compared to past seasons, doesn’t have as high of a dead body count, but there are still two pretty shocking deaths: Peter’s mentor-slash-handler Catherine (Amanda Warren) dying in an explosion staged by Monroe in episode two, and Peter’s partner Adam (David Lyons), who was previously Hagan’s commanding officer in the military, secretly shooting Monroe in the head in episode eight. Can you walk me through the thought process behind which characters you chose to kill off this season? Did you have any others that you considered killing off in the room?
We always discuss killing off everyone! You never want the deaths to feel like wallpaper. You never want them to feel gratuitous. You think about ways that you can earn them. Early on, we talked about Peter growing into being a leader. One of the ways that can happen is when you lose your leader, and you have to step up.
So it was out of those conversations that we talked about Catherine’s death — and all credit to Amanda Warren who played her so well. She didn’t have to come and do those two episodes. We had a contract [option] to either employ her for all of season three or not at all, so it had to be a negotiation for her to come back and just do the two [episodes]. She was truly lovely, and I explained to her what that death would mean for the show, what it would mean for Peter, and she really embraced it and was wonderful.
The Jacob Monroe death was something that the room pitched to me that I think is a great twist for Adam, who starts off as an ally for Peter. He’s someone who grew up believing that, as he said, “Generals question so that we don’t have to,” and [Adam] starts finding himself in the gravitational pole of a corrupt presidential administration by which he begins to be corrupted. I liked that there was some reticence and hesitation from him about doing what he did [by killing Monroe] and almost a little instant regret, because there are a lot of good aspects of Adam.
So both those deaths came out of [the idea that] you have a political thriller, it’s a dangerous world. There are some characters that aren’t going to survive. That’s just one of the signatures of this genre. You always want it to be surprising but inevitable, and I think the game that Jacob Monroe was playing inevitably led to his demise. I don’t think he was destined to die by cancer. I would say that you smartly put your finger on something — we did lean a little bit more into tension in season three. A little less violence, and a little more tension, was an intentional calibration for this particular season that we were interested in.
Peter gets dangerously close to dying multiple times this season — most notably at the hands of his Night Action partner Adam, who is actually an old friend of the corrupt POTUS. Why do you think Adam ultimately lets Peter go after initially shooting him in the finale?
Despite his actions in the last three episodes, I think Adam is ultimately a decent person, and what he was ordered to do, with increasingly less and less justification, reached the point where [he thought to himself] “Am I the person that’s going to sit here and shoot an unarmed man who is just trying to do the right thing?” That was the line that Adam couldn’t cross. He was led to believe erroneously that it was Peter who was off the rails, and then when he gets confirmation that Freya was helping the president and the first lady launder their money, [he realizes] that this isn’t about national security anymore. This is about protecting their own interests, not protecting the nation. That was the last straw for Adam.
Again, I think our villains are multifaceted. They’re not just there to do the evil thing. I think Adam had a lot of points in the season — saving Peter at the end of episode four, working with Peter in episodes five and six — that revealed him to be someone that wanted to be on the forces of good. He thought for a while he was on the forces of good, even if he was asked to be doing tough and violent things. I think when confronted finally with that evidence, that was the line for him that said, “I can’t just shoot and kill this man, in this instance.”
You gave almost all of the surviving characters some kind of coda, but what exactly happens to Adam after he lets Peter go? Where is he? Is he coming back next season?
[Pauses.] The reason why I pause sometimes when I’m answering your questions is that I’m living in this world where I’m getting asked questions about season three, but I’ve been spending the last few months working on season four. I will tell you that the answers to your questions exist in season four, as it relates to Adam.
Stephen Moyer in The Night Agent season three.
Christopher Saunders/Netflix
Peter and Isabel’s investigation into Monroe puts them on a direct collision course with a hit man (played by Stephen Moyer) with a young child, who he seems to have kidnapped on one of his other ops and has now raised on his own. Does this unnamed assassin have a name, or is he just called The Father?
No, we always referred to him as The Father. He gave a fake name to Freya in that bar at the end. That’s not his name. The son tells Peter his name is Orion, but we know that’s a code name he was given. One of the things that I was thinking about, and the other writers were thinking about, is how often kids and parents don’t really use each other’s names in real life. (Laughs.) We just liked the mystery of that.
That’s one of my favorite storylines that we’ve done in all three seasons of the show. I thought Stephen Moyer was so fantastic. Callum Vinson, who played the son, was the real discovery for us all. Credit to the casting department at Sony. He had been in Long Bright River, [another] show of [the studio, Sony Pictures Television], and they recommended that we take a look at him for this role, and he was so, so good. The two of them were so good together. I loved writing that. I loved working on that in the editing room — seeing the two of them work together, and then seeing that all come together in episode eight in the interrogation scenes between the father and Peter, and then seeing the son appear there later in the episode.
The Father has a crisis of conscience as a hit man over the course of the season. And as soon as he sees Peter using “Orion” as a bargaining chip for his own survival in that episode, The Father realizes that he is not cut out for this lifestyle anymore. The last time we see The Father onscreen, he is impersonating a British man who flirts with an unsuspecting Freya, who now goes by Nina, at a restaurant on the boardwalk. Are we meant to interpret the fact that he pulled out a vial of clear liquid from his pocket as proof that he poisoned Freya and presumably killed her?
Yeah, I think we’re meant to interpret that he poisoned her the same way that he poisoned [Isabel’s newspaper boss] Mike in episode two. She threatened his family. There’s one thing about going away, but there’s another about leaving that threat hanging over you and your son. So I think that was him closing the last loophole before walking off — literally — into the sunset on the boardwalk with his son.
We’ve spoken quite a bit about what next season will look like, but The Night Agent hasn’t officially been renewed yet. Where exactly are you in terms of renewal talks with Netflix about season four?
We’re not officially picked up yet, but we’ve been actively working on the writers room. So I just want to be super clear that there’s no news to report on that front. We are just focused on the creative, and when the time comes for Netflix to pick up, they’ll let you guys know.
But what I will say is that [Netflix executives] really do care a lot about the viewer experience, and they understand that fans don’t always like it when there’s too much time between seasons. So I think one thing on their more successful shows is that they’ll allow the writing process to get going a little bit so that when they do pick up a show officially, we can get into production quicker. We can finish the episodes and we can release them to the public with a more regular cadence than we otherwise might be able to if we were waiting for an official pickup to happen before the writing process [begins].
How many seasons of The Night Agent would you ideally want to make, and do you think this show could go on without Peter — or Gabriel — at the center of the action?
I haven’t really considered that a lot. There’s a lot of evolution for Peter that I’d want to explore before exploring the world without him. What you’re talking about is partly creative, but it’s also partly business. I certainly have business partners in Sony and Netflix, so I’d be hesitant to go on the record about what those plans are. I do think, as you’re talking creatively about season four, it’s natural to talk about: Where do we think we’re going in the long-term? You hope you’re the kind of show that would be granted a clear and final season by Netflix so that you could wrap it up. We just saw Stranger Things get a chance to wrap up their storyline after a number of successful years. We saw The Crown get a chance to wrap things up. My hope would be that our show, with the success that we’ve had, would get a chance to do that.
I imagine if and when the time comes, there’ll be a conversation that involves creative and financials. These shows always get more expensive the longer they go on, but because of the nature of the ever-revolving and changing worlds, I do think the show has the potential for longevity. That doesn’t mean it’s Law & Order: SVU 25 seasons and counting, but I think there are more stories to tell — and I hope we’ll get the chance to tell them.
***
The first three seasons of The Night Agent are now streaming on Netflix.
The San Francisco Giants signed Luis Arráez to a one-year deal, with the hope that the three-time batting champion will be able to help solidify their offense after their blockbuster deal that brought Rafael Devers to the Bay last season. However, after finishing at 81–81, are the Giants doing enough to try and compete for a title?
Advertisement
On this episode of Baseball Bar-B-Cast, Jake Mintz and Jordan Shusterman examine the questionable offseason that President of Baseball Operations Buster Posey has navigated for his Giants. While being in the same division as the Los Angeles Dodgers does present some difficulties, should the Giants be doing a bit more to show their commitment to winning? Could they still find a way to improve their rotation before the start of the season?
Later, Jordan and Jake talk about the trade that saw the St. Louis Cardinals trade Brendan Donovan in a three-team deal to the Seattle Mariners and why he is going to be a key player for them. They then discuss the Chicago White Sox’s active weekend, the Sacramento A’s signing Jacob Wilson to an extension, all before they get into the problem that insurance is causing with World Baseball Classic rosters.
2:29 – The Opener: A look at the Giants
29:58 – Around the League: Mariners trade for Donovan
Advertisement
48:18 – Turbo Mode: Reds sign Eugenio Suárez
58:37 – Tarik Skubal vs. Detroit Tigers
1:01:44 – We Need to Talk About: WBC insurance
Photo by Brian Rothmuller/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images AP Photo/Benjamin Fanjoy, File Photo by Andy Kuno/San Francisco Giants/Getty Images
(Photo by Brian Rothmuller/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images AP Photo/Benjamin Fanjoy, File Photo by Andy Kuno/San Francisco Giants/Getty Images)
Fractured, unpredictable and thrilling chaos are defining this awards season after a wild night at the 79th BAFTA Awards, with the race now barreling into the final stretch before Oscar voting opens Thursday, Feb. 26.
Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another” was the night’s dominant force, winning six BAFTAs: best film, director, adapted screenplay, supporting actor (Sean Penn), cinematography and editing.
For Oscar watchers, the technical trophies matter as much as the headline prizes. Winning for the artisans brings crucial momentum. “One Battle After Another” leaves BAFTA positioned as a below-the-line viability and still a clear best picture frontrunner. But if anyone hoped for a night of tidy answers, BAFTA offered the opposite with a loud reshuffle that may have clarified one thing and destabilized nearly everything else.
Only one Black screenwriter has ever won for original screenplay at the Oscars (Jordan Peele for “Get Out,” 2017). Coogler’s BAFTA trophy strengthens his Oscar prospects against a crowded field. However, and just as important, “Sinners” showed more above-the-line vitality where it needed oxygen most, with Mosaku’s supporting actress win adding real heat to the campaign.
So if you’re keeping score — “One Battle After Another” needed to prove below-the-line love (which it did), and “Sinners” needed to prove more above-the-line love (which it did). Obviously, “One Battle After Another” taking best film and director, after sweeping major critics awards and the DGA leaves many believing it’s over. But if you do your Oscar homework, you know that’s never the case. We have the PGA Awards and the Actor Awards (formerly SAG Awards) happening this upcoming week, all amid final Oscar voting. There’s room for more shifts to happen in the coming days.
Courtesy Everett Collection
Another significant upset came later in the BAFTA evening when Timothée Chalamet lost the leading actor award to Robert Aramayo for his performance in Kirk Jones’ Tourette’s drama “I Swear.” Aramayo also won the EE Rising Star Award, the only honor voted on by the public. Interestingly, Aramayo and “I Swear” have different kinds of momentum, which are forward-looking for next year’s Oscars. The film will be eligible for the 99th Oscars ceremony, with a U.S. release later this year from Sony Pictures Classics.
Nonetheless, Chalamet arrived as the presumed frontrunner after major victories at CCAs and Globes for Josh Safdie’s sports dramedy. At this stage in the season, a loss like this cannot be read as a mere statistical blip. Rather, it can change the story voters tell themselves when they fill out their ballots. Whether it proves ultimately fatal to the campaign is unknowable. Still, it is absolutely relevant, particularly with final voting around the corner.
The SAG Award may now serve as the decisive indicator. Variety has projected for weeks that Ethan Hawke could be the victor in the category for his work as Lorenz Hart in “Blue Moon.” Whoever claims that prize will likely emerge as your Oscar winner. And worth noting: no performer has ever won back-to-back SAG Awards in the same category. Chalamet, who took home the prize last year for “A Complete Unknown,” would make history if he reversed course and won.
Jessie Buckley won leading actress for “Hamnet,” which also won for outstanding British film. The result was broadly anticipated, and the reason is simple, as Buckley’s campaign has looked like the closest thing to a straight line in a season full of detours.
The real circus, though, is the supporting acting races. If BAFTA proved anything, it’s that both are wide open, and not in the polite, pundit-friendly way, but in the genuine chaotic manner. We’ve had three different winners — for both supporting acting races — at the Globes, CCA, and BAFTAs so far.
The closest occurrence of something like this happening was in 2004. Globes went to Clive Owen and Natalie Portman for “Closer” (who both missed SAG noms). CCA went to the “Sideways” duo, Thomas Haden Church and Virginia Madsen, and SAG went to eventual Oscar winner Morgan Freeman from “Million Dollar Baby” and Cate Blanchett from “The Aviator.” That specific year, the BAFTA Awards were the final say on the season, with Owen and Blanchett taking their prizes. In the end, it was SAG that was ultimately correct with Freeman from the eventual best picture winner, and Blanchett from the presumed “runner-up.”
Even though he’s a two-time Oscar winner for “Mystic River” (2003) and “Milk” (2008), Penn won his first-ever BAFTA for supporting actor for his villainous turn as Col. Lockjaw in “One Battle After Another,” adding his name to the already fractured leaderboard. Jacob Elordi holds the Critics Choice prize for “Frankenstein.” Stellan Skarsgård took the Golden Globe for “Sentimental Value.” Now Penn has a BAFTA. With the Actor Award still pending, this race is starting to resemble a five-sided coin flip. If Benicio del Toro takes the SAG prize, we’ll have four different winners at every televised show, which hasn’t happened since the COVID-era of 2020’s best actress race — which ended up favoring the BAFTA winner from the eventual best picture winner “Nomadland,” Frances McDormand. That leaves surprise Oscar nominee Delroy Lindo, who is still very much on the table for his work in “Sinners.” Interestingly, before 2020, another time four different winners won awards at the precursors was the 2000 season, where Frances McDormand won CCA for “Almost Famous,” before her co-star Kate Hudson took the Golden Globe, followed by SAG with Judi Dench for “Chocolat” and BAFTA for Julie Walters in “Billy Elliot.” The eventual Oscar winner was Marcia Gay Harden from “Pollock,” who, like Lindo, didn’t land any noms from any of the precursors. Could that be a sign of good things to come for Lindo?
Skarsgård’s loss, in particular, lands with force. His turn as film director Gustav Borg in “Sentimental Value” (which won a single prize for non-English-language film) had the role and prestige that often come with supporting, even with a SAG snub under his belt. Regina King (“If Beale Street Could Talk,” 2018) is the last acting winner to do so without a win from either SAG or BAFTA (and she coincidentally didn’t have nominations at either).
Supporting actress is no calmer. Teyana Taylor has the Golden Globe for “One Battle After Another.” Amy Madigan won Critics Choice for “Weapons” but wasn’t nominated at BAFTA. Mosaku now has a BAFTA for “Sinners.” None of it adds up to a safe consensus, and that uncertainty is the point. With SAG still to come and no obvious default choice, the industry’s own voting bloc may end up acting as the season’s final referee.
Beyond the headline races, the craft categories offered their declarative statements. “Frankenstein” won costume design, makeup and hair, and production design, giving it a firm technical foothold as Oscar voters start locking in their preferences. “Sentimental Value” won film not in the English language, but “The Secret Agent” has Globes and CCA under its belt as well. “Mr. Nobody Against Putin” won documentary over the presumed favorite “The Perfect Neighbor.” In contrast, “Zootopia 2” won animated film, without the presence of “KPop Demon Hunters,” which wasn’t eligible to be nominated due to its release. However, EJAE still gave the film a presence just one day after it swept the Annie Awards, taking home 10 statuettes.
Heading into the final weeks of awards season, the shape of the battlefield is clearer and messier at the same time. “One Battle After Another” looks like the best picture target everyone else has to hit. Buckley appears to be the closest thing to a near-lock in any acting race. Coogler has the wind at his back in original screenplay. And almost everything else remains in flux. The BAFTAs rarely make the Oscars simpler. This year, they’ve made them electric.
Final Oscar voting will take place from Feb. 26 to March 5. The 98th Oscars will be held March 15 and will air on ABC, hosted by Conan O’Brien. This week’s updated Oscar predictions are below.
Animated Feature: “KPop Demon Hunters” (Netflix) — Maggie Kang, Chris Appelhans and Michelle L.M. Wong
Production Design: “Frankenstein” (Netflix) — Tamara Deverell; Shane Vieau
Cinematography: “One Battle After Another” (Warner Bros.) — Michael Bauman
Costume Design: “Frankenstein” (Netflix) — Kate Hawley
Film Editing: “One Battle After Another” (Warner Bros.) — Andy Jurgensen
Makeup and Hairstyling: “Frankenstein” (Netflix) — Mike Hill, Jordan Samuel and Cliona Furey
Sound: “F1” (Apple Original Films/Warner Bros.) — Gareth John, Al Nelson, Gwendolyn Yates Whittle, Gary A. Rizzo and Juan Peralta
Visual Effects: “Avatar: Fire and Ash” (20th Century Studios) — Joe Letteri, Richard Baneham, Eric Saindon and Daniel Barrett
Original Score: “Sinners” (Warner Bros.) — Ludwig Göransson
Original Song: “Golden” from “KPop Demon Hunters” (Netflix) — EJAE, Mark Sonnenblick, Joong Gyu Kwak, Yu Han Lee, Hee Dong Nam, Jeong Hoon Seon and Teddy Park
Documentary Feature: “The Perfect Neighbor” (Netflix) — Geeta Gandbhir, Alisa Payne, Nikon Kwantu and Sam Bisbee
International Feature: “Sentimental Value” from Norway (Neon) — dir. Joachim Trier
Animated Short: “The Girl Who Cried Pearls” (National Film Board of Canada) — Chris Lavis and Maciek Szczerbowski
Documentary Short: “All the Empty Rooms” (Netflix) — Joshua Seftel and Conall Jones
Live Action Short: “Two People Exchanging Saliva” (Canal+/The New Yorker) — Alexandre Singh and Natalie Musteata
Is James Rodríguez really headed to Minnesota United? In one of the strangest transfer rumors we’ve ever seen, the Cooligans unpack how a global superstar could end up in MLS, what it would mean for Minnesota, and whether James still has enough left to move the needle in the league — or if this is destined to be pure chaos.
Advertisement
Next, we revisit the USMNT hype machine and ask some uncomfortable questions. Gio Reyna, Yunus Musah, Gianluca Busio, Jordan Morris — all players who once felt like sure things. So what happened? We break down why their trajectories have stalled, what went wrong at club level, and whether there’s still time for a second act.
Finally, we react to the wildest stories from around world soccer. From Vinícius Jr.’s girlfriend revealing uncomfortable details involving Real Madrid, to Gabriel Barbosa’s tense encounter with fans, to Cristiano Ronaldo’s “missing” posters popping up in Saudi Arabia — it’s another reminder that no sport delivers chaos quite like football.
Timestamps:
(6:30) – James Rodriguez’s shock transfer to Minnesota United
Advertisement
(21:30) – USMNT rising stars that have now faded
(49:30) – Vini Jr’s girlfriend’s weird ointment story
(53:30) – Reacting to other news around the soccer world
In the new world of college football there may be just as much action in the courtroom as there is on the field. The latest trend is if you want another season in college, after your eligibility is up, take it to the courtroom! The two most recent cases of that are Trinidad Chambliss and Joey Aguilar. Both of whom are waiting to see if they get an injunction that will allow them to play in the 2026 season. Andy Staples, Ross Dellenger and Steven Godfrey explain both of these cases and update everyone with where the cases are in the process. They also take a look at the schools these quarterbacks are looking to go back to. Both schools have 5-star QBs waiting in the wings, which leads to the question: in the transfer portal era, are 5-star QBs better off going to a smaller school where to play right away and transferring later?
Advertisement
Then, the guys get into some more College Football Playoff conversation. The CFP released the 2026 & 2027 schedule for the quarterfinals, semifinals and championship game. In 2026, the playoff spans over 39 days. Andy, Ross and Godfrey discuss the ludicrous schedule. They also talk about a potential savior being the NFL. With the NFL now owning a stake in ESPN, will they help out college football’s scheduling to make it a better product?
Later, Andy shares the results of his homework assignment. Last episode, the guys discussed how weak Week 1 is to start the 2026 season. Andy shares his plan of how to move Oklahoma and Michigan to Week 1 to inject some energy into the opening weekend slate of games. The guys also close the show by discussing the Washington Post shutting down their sports division.
All of this and more on College Football Enquirer.
Tennessee’s Joey Aguilar Photo by Johnnie Izquierdo/Getty Images
(Photo by Johnnie Izquierdo/Getty Images)
0:00:00 – SEC QB’s suing for eligibility
Advertisement
6:18 – Trinidad Chambliss’ case update
8:32 – Joey Aguilar case update
16:08 – What does the future of 5-star QB’s in college look like?
Will injuries hurt either the Seattle Seahawks or New England Patriots in Sunday’s Super Bowl LX matchup? Yahoo Sports’ Jason Fitz, Charles Robinson and Ben Fawkes break down the latest intel from both sides and give their game predictions. Plus, the guys explore the possibility that Matthew Stafford wins MVP and retires. What would that mean for the Los Angeles Rams? Hear about that and more on today’s huge preview episode!
Advertisement
(1:20) – Injury updates ahead of Super Bowl LX
(12:15) – Rams and 49ers to play in Australia in 2026
(18:09) – Eagles part ways with OL coach Jeff Stoutland
(22:30) – Could Matthew Stafford retire?
(32:23) – Tom Brady have issues getting into the HOF?
On today’s Kevin O’Connor show, we’ve got a trade-deadline special! Kevin O’Connor is joined by Tom Haberstroh to dissect any and all movement in the league before the 3 PM ET buzzer, going through the biggest winners and losers in what may be the weirdest trade deadline in NBA history.
First, the pair discuss the Milwaukee Bucks’ decision to retain Giannis Antetokounmpo, and what that means for the landscape of the NBA–and for the future outlook of the Golden State Warriors, especially after the anticlimactic end of the Jonathan Kuminga saga. Were the Warriors the biggest losers of the trade deadline? Will another team arise in the summer to win the Antetokounmpo sweepstakes?
Advertisement
Next, they discuss the James Harden trade to the Cleveland Cavaliers, and if this move can bring the city of Cleveland to the Finals once again.
Then, they muse on what exactly made this deadline so weird: multiple All-Stars being traded to bad NBA teams. They ask: why are bad teams trading for good players? Why are the Utah Jazz putting their top-8 protected first round pick in jeopardy? Why such a paltry return for Anthony Davis, who was traded for Luka Doncic just last year?
Plus, they cover all the bases with the more local trades made, from the Chicago Bulls picking up 9 second round picks to the Boston Celtics acquiring their long-coveted big man in Nikola Vucevic. Plus more questions: why didn’t the Sacramento Kings trade for Ja Morant? Why did the Philadelphia 76ers let go of Jared McCain? All that and much, much more on today’s KOC Show!
(0:16) Trade deadline instant reactions (4:33) Giannis not traded by Bucks (10:39) Warriors trade Kuminga to Hawks (25:49) Cavs get James Harden (43:34) Wizards acquire Anthony Davis (48:22) Clippers trade Zubac to Pacers (55:57) Jazz trade for Jaren Jackson Jr. (1:02:18) Ja Morant stays in Memphis (1:07:45) Timberwolves trade recap (1:10:18) What are the Chicago Bulls up to? (1:13:05) Celtics trade Simons for Vucevic (1:19:04) 76ers trade Jared McCain to OKC
Milwaukee Bucks forward Giannis Antetokounmpo (34) brings the ball up the court against Golden State Warriors guard Stephen Curry during an NBA basketball game in San Francisco, Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2026. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
Nate Tice, Matt Harmon & Charles McDonald are LIVE from San Francisco to give their final thoughts and predictions for Super LX as they find the strengths and weaknesses of the Seattle Seahawks and New England Patriots.
Advertisement
The trio kick things off with the latest non-Super Bowl news from around the NFL, including Jay Glazer hinting at a potential Maxx Crosby departure on Yahoo Sports Daily and Philadelphia Eagles offensive line guru Jeff Stoutland departing, leaving Philly with major shoes to fill.
Next, the three hosts dive into the Super LX matchup, previewing each side of the ball’s top matchups to watch, key injuries, predictions for the game and more.
Later, Prime Vision’s Sam Schwartzstein joins the group to give his analytical insights on the game before Nate, Matt, Charles and Sam give their final Hail Mary bold predictions for the game.
The show wraps up with conversations with Josh Allen, Jayden Daniels & Bijan Robinson.