Author: rb809rb

  • Questions About Trump’s White House Correspondents Dinner Speech Can’t Stop The Party

    Questions About Trump’s White House Correspondents Dinner Speech Can’t Stop The Party

    On Saturday night, attendees at the annual White House Correspondents Dinner will thrill to the antics of Oz Pearlman, a renowned mentalist who dazzles audiences with mind-reading tricks. On Friday night, they partied as if they were going to see Amber Ruffin.

    Ruffin, a popular comedian whose appearance at the 2025 WHCD was scotched after she angered the White House with some podcast remarks in which she called the Trump administration “kind of a bunch of murderers,” would certainly be out of place at this year’s event, which is expected to feature remarks from President Trump himself — the first time in either of his two terms he’s agreed to appear. So dinner attendees making their way across various Friday-night events tied to the annual “nerd prom” used the celebrations to vent some of their anxieties.

    At a party backed by CAA and Vanity Fair, some conversations turned to whether the President might excoriate the media outlets that buy WHCD tables, and how long his remarks might last. Would journalists walk out if his comments hit too hard? And would the president appear — as others have at past WHCDs — to hand out awards to journalists who have done work that investigated him or the White House or revealed unsavory things about his time in it?

    People who offered their thoughts did so under the condition they not be identified, so as not to call attention to themselves during a weekend that already had plenty of attention upon it.

    Among those spotted at the event were CNN anchors Jim Sciutto, Elex Michelson, Wolf Blitzer and Jon Berman;Crooked Media’s Alex Wagner; former CBS News president Susan Zirinsky; ABC News’ Rick Klein; and independent journalist Don Lemon. The event was held at the residence of the Belgian Ambassador.

    And at a party held in Georgetown by UTA, some members of a throng of attendees mused about the direction of CBS News. On Thursday, the Paramount division held a private dinner that brought together CBS News executives, Washington staffers, and President Trump, who spoke for an hour, according to a report in the New York Times. The meeting, which generated protest outside, took place as Paramount, run by CEO David Ellison, seeks regulatory approval for its plans to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, a deal that would create a massive assemblage of influential but old-school media assets. Paramount and CBS News declined to comment on the event.

    Spotted at the UTA celebration, held at Osteria Mozza, were “CBS Evening News” anchor Tony Dokoupil; MS NOW’s Katy Tur; ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith; Fox News Channel’s Shannon Bream and Jimmy Failla; NBC News’ Gabe Gutierrez; and CNN’s Jake Tapper.

    Any celebration of journalism takes place as doubts about its future fester. Most of the major TV-news outlets continue to grapple with a rising generation of viewers who gravitate to digital creators and influencers: the erosion of traditional TV ratings; and the ongoing threat of layoffs as their parent corporations struggle to position themselves in the streaming era.

    Some celebrations were less traditional. Grindr, the LGBTQ+ dating app eager to expand its influence on policy, held its own WHCD event, though CEO George Arison declined to reveal its location or discuss who might attend. Still, he noted, “Grindr is good at convening people,” and indicated that no matter what President Trump said Saturday night, the U.S. enjoyed freedoms that aren’t always found elsewhere.

    “I was born in the Soviet Union. I came to America when I was 14, on my own,” Arison said. “I’ve lived in a country where you could not say what you wanted, and one of the things that makes America awesome is that you can say whatever you want and the government can’t do anything about that.”

    One reason journalists and media executives still come to the WHCD in the Trump era is the opportunity to pitch. There are still scoops to promote, projects to tout and reputations to burnish. Yes, that was CSPAN boss Sam Feist making the rounds at the CAA party with two pins promoting his network on his lapel. And yes, a broad coterie of top news executives were spotted throughout the evening, including Debra OConnell, chair of Disney Entertainment Television; Mark Lazarus, CEO of Versant Media; Cesar Conde, chair of NBCUniversal’s news operations; Rebecca Blumenstein, NBC News’ president of editorial; Rebecca Kutler, president of MS NOW; Almin Karamehmedovic, president of ABC News;Amy Entelis,  CNN’s executive vice president for talent and development; Tom Cibrowski, president of CBS News; Bari Weiss, editor in chief of CBS News; and KC Sullivan, president of CNBC.

    The executives know that, no matter what President Trump might say, they are about to enter what is usually a robust cycle for the news business. A midterm election, which often brings new dollars in advertising and a much broader viewership base, lies in the offing. And the results may raise stakes in Washington, which would only fuel greater ambitions.

    So have another drink, folks. President Trump may scold, yell, or even scorch, but no matter what he says, and no matter how much Industry hand-wringing it inspires, there’s always more news to cover.

  • ‘Fargo’ and ‘Alien: Earth’ Creator Noah Hawley Says YouTube Is His ‘Biggest Competition’: ‘You Are Losing Eyeballs to Things That Are Free’

    ‘Fargo’ and ‘Alien: Earth’ Creator Noah Hawley Says YouTube Is His ‘Biggest Competition’: ‘You Are Losing Eyeballs to Things That Are Free’

    Noah Hawley, creator of TV series “Fargo,” “Legion” or “Alien: Earth,” remains optimistic about the industry. 

    “It has been a process to become optimistic,” he clarified at Canneseries

    “We are between the old and the new model, but there are masterpieces in every generation and we just have to figure out how to make them now. It’s a larger question about what tech companies have done to Hollywood – we have all been impacted by it. They tend to come into the industry, flood it with money and everyone feels: ‘Oh, it’s a renaissance.’ Then it all dries up.” 

    The last few years have been challenging. “Our biggest competition is YouTube, which spends zero dollars to make anything. You’re producing films and TV for hundreds of millions of dollars, and losing eyeballs every day to things that are free.” 

    Hawley started out as a novelist and still writes, but “TV is the fastest way to talk to the culture,” he said. 

    “If you have something vital to say, TV is a better medium.”

    “Someone recently called me ‘the franchise whisperer,’ which is a valuable thing to be right now – our industry is so focused on franchises and existing IPs, and audiences will watch them more reliably. I also have a reputation for being an original storyteller, which doesn’t make much sense. But I’m interpreting these brands – what is ‘Fargo,’ what is ‘Alien’ – and telling an entirely new story to you that will evoke the feelings you had when watching the original.”

    He’s also behind “Legion,” taking on the X-Men universe. 

    “Freud wrote an essay called ‘The Uncanny,’ grappling with the human belief in the supernatural. It’s when familiar things act in unfamiliar ways. A haunted house story is unsettling because your house isn’t supposed to do that. [I thought:] What if ‘Breaking Bad’ was about Walter White becoming a supervillain? I found Professor X’s son, who’s mentally ill, basically. He has these powers but he’s not sure whether they’re real. And if he doesn’t know, then that’s the show.”

    Dan Stevens played the lead.

    “He had really bad food poisoning [when filming the pilot]. He would go throw up in a bucket every time we yelled ‘cut!’ and then dance again. That’s the dedication of actors,” joked Hawley.

    He doesn’t rewatch the originals before embarking on his shows, he admitted. Instead, he thinks about the emotions he remembers from them.

    “When I think about [Ridley Scott’s] ‘Alien,’ there’s this strong emotion of discovery surrounding the lifecycle of this creature. It starts as an egg, comes out and attaches itself to you, and you think it’s the worst thing you’ve ever seen. But there’s more! Then the chestburster comes out,” he laughed. 

    “In the second film, you already know that evolution, so you replace surprise with suspense. To make you feel the same way you felt when watching Ridley’s movie, I needed to introduce new creatures.”

    Second season of the show is on its way. “Fargo” had five seasons – so far.

    “To me, ‘Fargo’ is about the battle between decency and cynicism. It’s not about good and evil; it’s about people who believe in the value of others and those who don’t. David Thewlis says in the third season: ‘The problem is not that there’s evil in the world – the problem is that there’s good. Otherwise, who would care?’ In my country, we are not going in the right direction. Decency isn’t winning – cynicism is,” said Hawley.

    “In Season 5, everyone in that show was a Republican. Different versions of a Republican, but still. I was trying very hard not to be political with a capital P, but to talk about the humanity underneath it all.”

    If the second season was about “the death of a family business and the rise of corporate America” and the third about “deconstructing the phrase ‘this is a true story’ in the world of alternative facts,” the last one was about the need for a justice system.

    “One man, a sheriff, who believes he’s right, is no better than a villain. There’s a coherent mindset when you watch ‘Yellowstone’ or ‘1883,’ rooted in the idea that nobody can tell a man what’s right or wrong. He knows it in his bones. There are scenes when [Jon] Hamm lists some ridiculous laws, but that doesn’t mean the law itself is ridiculous,” he stated. 

    “I went into that season believing there’s a significant audience that believes he’s the hero, and my job was to push them, asking: ‘Are you still with him?’ But no one ever calls to say if it works or not.” 

    Despite the many iconic male characters over the years – “Billy Bob Thorton showed up with that hair and I thought: ‘We are making the same show.’” – women are still carrying the stories.

    “These franchises are female in my mind. If women weren’t at the center of these stories, I would be doing it wrong.”

    When interpreting known brands, his first mission is authenticity.

    “You have to say: ‘I understand what ‘Alien’ is.’ Once I achieve that, I can do the original thing. I don’t think of it as ‘fan service’. It’s about feeling you’ve got it right. These things need to stand on their own two feet.”

    For “Alien,” he came up with “the Peter Pan metaphor.”

    “This story is about humanity trapped between the monsters of our past and the monsters of our future, like AI, which feels like the world of today.”

    Has he used AI already? 

    “Not yet, but we’ve had these conversations. If I’m spending $150 million to $170 million to make a season of ‘Alien,’ that’s a lot of money, and corporations are desperate to find ways to spend less. I remain open-minded about how storytellers could use it, but it shouldn’t replace them.”

    He added: “I wrote this novel and it has a plane crash and underwater sequences, so it’s expensive to make. But at the heart of it is a human drama. If all the bigger stuff was AI, would it be good to have this film in the world? The only way to see Kubrick’s ‘Napoleon’ would be for them to shoot parts of the movie and use AI for the rest. It’s inevitable. I would rather be in control of the solution of a problem than have it happen to me.”

  • A Draft of a Major New Update for Ethereum Has Been Released

    A Draft of a Major New Update for Ethereum Has Been Released

    A new proposal shared by Ethereum developer Tom Lehman aims to increase privacy on the ETH network. Draft EIP-8182, prepared by Ethereum developers, envisions significant protocol-level changes to make transactions more anonymous and secure.

    The proposal aims to integrate a “shared shielding pool” mechanism directly into the Ethereum protocol layer. This structure, which will operate through system contracts and zero-knowledge (ZK) pre-compilations, can be implemented with just a hard fork update. The goal is to create a unified set of anonymities and a trustless security model across the network.

    EIP-8182 proposes enabling users to make private transfers to any address, separating authorization and proof-of-work processes, and supporting customizable authentication methods. The proposal also includes atomic transactions that allow for the private exchange and subsequent concealment of assets. This ensures that the privacy features remain compatible with Ethereum’s existing application layer interoperability.

    Related News Coinbase Shares the Most Critical Level for the Bitcoin Price

    Lehman stated that currently all transactions on Ethereum are publicly accessible, which contradicts the concept of privacy found in traditional financial systems. While Vitalik Buterin had previously suggested integrating privacy tools into wallets, it was noted that current solutions have significant drawbacks.

    Among these problems, the “chicken-and-egg problem” (the inability of new applications to provide sufficient privacy initially) and shortcomings in the trust model stand out, especially in terms of anonymity. The fact that updates are dependent on the control of specific groups is also cited as another factor limiting the adoption of current solutions.

    According to data, less than one in ten thousand transactions on the Ethereum network are conducted privately. This rate is even below the peak levels of 2020. The new EIP-8182 proposal aims to reverse this trend and increase the use of privacy within the Ethereum ecosystem.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Kunchacko Boban, Lijomol Jose Thriller Title Set as ‘Unmadham,’ Release Date Unveiled (EXCLUSIVE)

    Kunchacko Boban, Lijomol Jose Thriller Title Set as ‘Unmadham,’ Release Date Unveiled (EXCLUSIVE)

    The Kunchacko Boban and Lijomol Jose psychological thriller from India’s T-Series and Panorama Studios has confirmed its title as “Unmadham,” a Malayalam-language word meaning “frenzy.” The producers unveiled a first look poster on Saturday for the film, and an August release date.

    Helmed by Kiran Das, “Unmadham” marks the feature directorial debut of one of Malayalam cinema’s most prominent editors. Das is a Kerala State Film Award winner for “Ishq” who has cut a string of acclaimed titles including “Thondimuthalum Driksakshiyum,” “Joji,” “Moothon,” “Romancham,” “Rorschach,” “Joseph,” and “Ela Veezha Poonchira.”

    The screenplay comes from Indian National Film Award-winning writer Shahi Kabir, who previously worked with Boban on “Officer On Duty” and is also known for “Nayattu” and “Joseph.” The story centers on a police constable whose already strained domestic life grows more precarious when he reopens a cold case with apparent supernatural dimensions, his grip on reality loosening the deeper he investigates.

    “‘Unmadham’ is about the frenzy that builds quietly within a person. My character is torn between responsibility and doubt, and as the case unfolds, his world begins to shift in unexpected ways. It’s a role that demanded emotional intensity and restraint at the same time,” Boban said.

    “What excited me about ‘Unmadham’ is the tension at its heart – a simple police constable reopening a forgotten case that slowly begins to consume his life and sanity. At Panorama Studios, we believe in backing stories that challenge and engage viewers, and ‘Unmadham’ is exactly that – gripping, unpredictable, and rooted in powerful performances,” said Abhishek Pathak, producer at Panorama Studios.

    “‘Unmadham’ is the kind of story that stays with you; it’s layered with psychological intensity and emotionally grounded narrative. The film’s unique blend of suspense with human conflict, set against a gripping investigative backdrop is what makes it a compelling cinematic experience,” said Bhushan Kumar, chair and managing director of T-Series.

    “With ‘Unmadham,’ we wanted to create an experience that keeps the audience constantly questioning what is real and what isn’t. It’s a film that builds tension in a very grounded way. Collaborating with T-Series on this slate has allowed us to scale these stories and reach a wider audience,” said Kumar Mangat Pathak, chair of Panorama Studios.

    The score is by Mujeeb Majeed (“Kishkindha Kandam”), action is by Kalai Kingson (“Marco,” “Bhramayugam”) and Arjun Seth serves as cinematographer. Gulshan Kumar and Bhushan Kumar present alongside Panorama Studios; Ram Mirchandani and Rajesh Menon co-produce, with Abhinav Mehrotra as creative producer.

    “Unmadham” is part of the joint Malayalam slate assembled by T-Series and Panorama Studios, which released “Anomie,” starring Rehman and Bhavana, earlier this year and has Asif Ali starrer “Tikitaka” upcoming. Panorama Studios has also entered a Malayalam co-production partnership with actor-producer Nivin Pauly, and struck distribution alliances with Century Films and overseas distributor Phars Film. “Unmadham” opens in cinemas Aug. 7.

  • Vampire Crawlers, Peter Molyneux’s return and other new indie games worth checking out

    Welcome to our latest roundup of what’s going on in the indie game space. If you’re looking for something new to play this weekend, we’ve got a bunch of options for you. We’ve also got some interesting upcoming games to tell you about as well.

    In a press release announcing that Playdate Season 3 is coming later this year, Panic included a line that I’ve been thinking about a lot this week. “Panic is currently relieved and happy that people can make amazing games for Playdate with just 16 megabytes of RAM,” it said, a nod toward the ongoing RAM crisis.

    The Playdate doesn’t exactly have a lot of technical oomph, and I’m frequently delighted by what developers are able to do within its limitations. Restrictions foster creativity — many folks had to get pretty inventive on Twitter back when they only had 140 characters to play with. Here, Panic offered a welcome reminder that you don’t necessarily need an ultra-powerful rig or console to have access to more great games than you’ll ever actually be able to play.

    For instance, my favorite game of the year so far, Titanium Court, works on Macs that are capable of running macOS 11 (the 2020 version of the operating system) or later. On PC, you’ll need a graphics card that’s compatible with OpenGL or DirectX 9, the latter of which was released in 2002. For what it’s worth, the game would also fit on a CD-ROM.

    There are tons of other great indie games new and old that’ll run just fine on lower-powered machines. Bear that in mind the next time a current-gen console or other gaming system gets a price increase because of the RAM shortage. The DLSS 5 debacle aside, you probably don’t need a 50-series NVIDIA GPU either. Maybe just pick up a Playdate instead.

    New releases

    While many of the weapons, characters and enemies are the same, Vampire Crawlers is a fresh spin on Vampire Survivors. It’s a turn-based roguelite deckbuilder. Instead of automatically firing whatever weapons you have at nearby enemies, you’ll play cards to conquer the mob that you face in each fight. You can still modify and evolve your weapons and abilities.

    Each card has a casting cost, so you’ll need to consider which ones to play in a given moment and the order in which you do so. As such, it’s a slower-paced, more strategic take on the original game, albeit with a similar level of visual chaos should you put together a particularly powerful build.

    I’ve played a ton of Vampire Survivors and the Vampire Crawlers demo lured me in too. Its approach to turn-based battles is working for me. I’ve only played a little of the full game so far, but there’s every chance I could lose days of my life to it.

    Vampire Crawlers — from Survivors creator Poncle and co-developer Nosebleed Interactive — is available now on Steam (for PC and Mac), Xbox for PC, Xbox Series X/S, PS5 and Nintendo Switch for $10. It’s included with Game Pass Ultimate and PC Game Pass.

    Fable creator Peter Molyneux and his studio 22cans are back with another god game. In Masters of Albion, you can construct and modify settlements as a literal hand of god. You’ll design buildings (which are immediately constructed and usable) and manage workers. You can also assume control of a human or animal in the world to take on quests and hunt for treasure.

    There’s a tower defense element to this as well. You’ll need to prepare your towns from nighttime attacks from various creatures. You can fend off these foes as the god or battle them on the ground as a hero. There’s a lot going on here, but perhaps my favorite part is this apparent warning in the mature content description section of the Steam page: “Players are also able to use crude, adult hand gestures at will in the game.” Yes, that means you can flip the bird while playing as the god hand. Yes, I am very mature.

    Masters of Albion is now available in early access on Steam. It typically costs $25, but there’s a 10 percent discount until April 29.

    Snap & Grab caught our attention at last summer’s edition of the Day of the Devs showcase. This is a cartoonish heist game in which you’ll carry out your robberies in two parts. You play as Nifty, a famous fashion photographer. In the setup phase, you’ll take advantage of your position to take snaps of loot, threats and opportunities and then use those to construct a plan. With the help of some henchman, you’ll then try to execute the heist.

    The game’s developer No Goblin is taking an episodic approach to Snap & Grab as it’s releasing the game in five parts over the course of this year. The first episode is available now on Steam (usually $8, though there’s a 10 percent discount until May 1).

    Snow Day Software’s follow-up to Indoor Kickball is Indoor Baseball. It’s an arcade game in which you play baseball inside buildings, funnily enough. You’ll play 1v1 matches against the CPU or a friend in local multiplayer. You can also dive into a 14-game season or check out the story mode, in which you’ll try to play your way back onto your school’s baseball team (and maybe do some chores to make up for smashing too many things at home).

    There are several different levels, each of which has a variety of ways for you to make a home run, from smashing a window to landing the ball in a toilet. It seems light and fun and as a burgeoning baseball guy, I dig the idea of this one.

    Indoor Baseball is available now on Steam, Xbox for PC, Xbox One, Xbox Series X/S, PS5 and Nintendo Switch. It costs $15.

    Upcoming

    I love Another Crab’s Treasure very much and so I’ll always be interested in whatever Aggro Crab is up to. Given that the studio also co-developed the smash hit Peak (alongside Landfall), I imagine many other folks feel the same way.

    Crashout Crew is another multiplayer game from Aggro Crab. This one adopts the chaotic co-op formula of games like Overcooked. As a team of forklift drivers, you and your buds will work together to fill orders in warehouses while dealing with obstacles like blackouts, cacti, fire and bees.

    It’s coming to Steam, Xbox on PC and Xbox Series X/S on May 28. It’ll be available on Game Pass on day one.

    I’m very much here for slice-of-life games based around soccer (I still need to play Despelote!). Kick is another such title. This is a side-scrolling, anime-inspired game from solo developer nospacelost and publisher Shoreline Games, in which you dribble a ball as you make your way to school.

    There are 23 levels with people to dodge and obstacles to overcome. You’ll need to avoid damaging anything as you try to pull off tricks by kicking the ball at the correct angle, all while making sure you get to class on time (you can switch off the timer for a more relaxed experience). It looks pretty, and it never hurts a game’s prospects to have a pup accompanying the main character.

    No release date for Kick has been announced. It’s coming to Steam at some point.

    Elfie: A Sand Plan is a cozy sandcastle building game from Pressed Elephant and Sol’s Atelier. There are more than 180 levels in which you’ll build sand sculptures to match what Elfie, a small elephant, has in mind. There are three difficulty levels too.

    It looks cute and I adore elephants (oops, I just started fostering another one), so I’m interested in checking it out. Elfie: A Sand Plan is coming to Steam for PC and Mac on May 12. It’ll cost $7, and there’ll be a 10 percent launch discount.

    It took the team at Realmsoft 14 years to bring Clockwork Ambrosia to fruition and if this latest trailer is any indication, that long development cycle could have well been worthwhile. This is a side-scrolling action platformer in which you can customize half a dozen weapons using more than 150 modifiers.

    You play as an airship engineer who tries to survive on a steampunk island full of aggressive robots and creatures following a crash. I really dig the art direction here, which features lush hand-drawn pixel art and lovely animations. Realmsoft made the game using a custom engine the team built from scratch.

    I’m looking forward to checking out Clockwork Ambrosia. It’s coming to Steam on May 12.

  • Bitcoin (BTC) Faces Make-or-Break Test as Bulls Target $86K Next

    Bitcoin (BTC) Faces Make-or-Break Test as Bulls Target $86K Next

    Bitcoin traded near $77,600 after rebounding from levels close to $60,000 seen two months ago. The recovery returned the price to the $75,000 to $80,000 resistance zone. Analysts are now watching whether Bitcoin could extend the move or face another rejection.

    Two months earlier, the market showed a deeply oversold RSI and capitulation-style on-chain readings. At that stage, confidence in a near-term recovery had weakened across the market. The latest rebound has shifted attention back to upside levels.

    Bitcoin Faces Breakout and Retest Risk

    Analyst Michael van de Poppe said in an X post that markets are still looking for more upside in the coming weeks. He added that the Nasdaq continues to show stronger momentum, while Bitcoin remains behind that move.

    Van de Poppe said there is little reason to dismiss further upside from current levels. He added that a clear break above $86,000 in the coming months would support the view that the market low is already in place. The analyst also said he already expects that low to be set with a larger probability.

    However, in an X post, Rekt Capital said Bitcoin continues to face resistance at the 21-week EMA. Analyst added that Bitcoin must reclaim that level as support to avoid a weaker retest structure.

    If that recovery does not happen, the analyst said the price could revisit the top of the double-bottom pattern broken last week.

    Bitcoin Faces a Key Liquidity Squeeze

    However, Ted pointed to liquidation clusters building below current levels. One of those areas sits near $80,000, where Bitcoin bottomed in November 2025.

    Based on that setup, the analyst said the maximum pain scenario over the coming months could be a dump rather than a pump.

    Analyst Ardi focused on the short positions stacked above the recent local high. In an X post, Ardi said several hundred million dollars in short exposure sits above $79,500, around the $79,900 area.

    The analyst said months of positioning are concentrated in one dense liquidation band. If the green support zone holds during the retest, market makers could have an incentive to sweep that liquidity in the next few moves.

    Source: X

    Ardi said those buybacks could add strength to the advance and help Bitcoin move through $80,000. The analyst added that liquidity sitting only 2% above the price rarely remains untouched for long.

    Analytical platform CoinGlass highlighted a pullback in Bitcoin derivatives activity. Trading volume fell 20.20% to $61.97 billion, while open interest dropped 3.03% to $57.45 billion. The figures pointed to softer participation and lighter positioning in futures.

    At the same time, the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF market showed stronger capital demand. BlackRock’s IBIT entered the top 10 U.S. ETFs by inflows. This shift came as geopolitical tensions stayed in focus and some investors looked to Bitcoin as a hedge against uncertainty.
    Related: Bitcoin Bulls Defend Trend While $2 Billion Inflows Fuel $85K Outlook

  • Javier Ambrossi and Javier Calvo and Movistar Plus+ Bow ‘I Always Sometime,’ A Vision of Breadline Motherhood in Gentrified Barcelona  

    Javier Ambrossi and Javier Calvo and Movistar Plus+ Bow ‘I Always Sometime,’ A Vision of Breadline Motherhood in Gentrified Barcelona  

    Produced with Javier Ambrossi and Javier Calvo (“Veneno,” “La Mesías”), now Cannes Festival main competition contenders as directors of “La Bola Negra,” Movistar Plus+ Original “I Always Sometimes” begins with love at first lust. 

    Laura (Ana Boga), a festival organizer in Berlin, and Rubén (David Menéndez), a bar owner, meet at music fest Sonar and now walk the night-time streets of Barcelona quoting Rilke. They attend a rave on Montjuich, chill out in a chic bar owned by a friend of Ruben’s, and have great sex, after which Rubén proposes she moves in.   

    Cut to Ep. 2. Laura got pregnant one week after meeting Rubén, has moved out – he proved a booze-addled wastrel – and is back with her suffocating parents.  

    Created by Marta Bassols and Marta Loza, all the remaining episodes are entitled by the place Laura squats with her infant child Mario as she desperately attempt find a flat of her own in Barcelona, a city awash with rich tourists and gentrification, and to earn enough money to bring Mario up, though she has to spend most of her time caring for him, which she loves. 

    “Rent here is bloody insane. It’s impossible to find anything,” Laura complains to an artist friend. “Nothing’s impossible,” he retorts. “Flats in Barcelona are,” Laura replies with vehemence. 

    A touching take on maternity grounded in the nightmarish economics of single motherhood and indeed current-day life, as well as the emotional chaos of an early thirty-something, “I Always Something” was released April 23 on Movistar Plus+ in Spain. It now makes its international debut at Canneseries in main international competition two days later.

    Shot in six episodes, of 22-35 minutes, “I Always Sometimes” marks an auspicious writing debut from Bassols and Loza, and a case in point of the Javis’ nurturing new talent in Spain. Bassols, who played Roberta in “This Is Not Sweden,” was seen in “La Mesías”; Loza served as art director on TV series “Mariliendre,” also produced by Suma Content, the Javis production house. Directors are Claudia Costafreda, a writer on the Javis breakthrough “Veneno” before breaking out creating and directing “Cardo,” produced by Ambrossi and Calvo. Ginesta has directed episodes of Canneseries winner “Perfect Live” and Netflix smash hit “Elite.”

    Variety chatted to Las Martas in the run-up to Canneseries. 

    Laura and Rubén share their love of Rainer Maria Rilke, quoting a passage in “Letters to a Young Poet” where he advises that “the point is, to live everything.” Laura, likewise, doesn’t want her existence to be defined by being a single mother….

    Bassols: Laura likes sex, life, her work, art, eating, being with her woman friends. She likes the same she’d like if she wasn’t a mother. Maternity does’t eliminate what a person was before, nor occupy all their concerns. What Laura is doing is really important, but other things are really important to her. Her success is to see love and poetry all the time, despite her circumstances. 

    Most romances begin with normal life and build to a happy ending. “I Always Sometimes” is the other way round.

    Bassols: Episode 1 is like what happens after the happy ending. 

    Loza: This is the story of a young woman who’s trying to find her way in life, and a million things happen to her. Episode 1 was originally Episode 4, a flashback. Editing, however, we realized we lacked context, which gave larger depth to the characters, and made the series much more original. You understand Laura more, where she comes from, her expectations, her origin, and so understand far more the rest of her journey.

    Episodes vary in tone…

    Loza: Every episode has a different color, set in a place that forms part of her life where Laura tries to find herself, from the position she’s now in. Each episode is like an isolated story, which can be watched independently, inspired a lot by the show stories of Raymond Carver. She lives in a different house and in a way is looking for part of herself in the places where she was happy before becoming a mother, but something’s changed. 

    And how did you share directing?

    Loza: I directed the first episode, Claudia [Costafreda] directed the second,  third and No. 6 and Ginesta [Guindal] 4 and 5.

    And did you have any general guidelines, regarding direction? 

    Loza: Since my episode was the first, the first romantic moments, I was clear that it had to be the opposite of the rest: sequence shots, giving space for the actors, with a lot of rehearsals so that the actors could make the dialogs theirs, incorporating improvisation to break with the text, and give everything a before-dawn feel. Ginesta’s Episode 4, in contrast, where she Laura touches rock bottom, there are a lot of shots, editing, a sense of acceleration, and I think it works. Every episode had a different color, some warmer, some cold and Episode 6, set in Berlin, almost reaching black and white.  

    Most of the series, however, is set in Barcelona, which is crucial. 

    Borras: Yes, Barcelona comes across normally as a cool place, a vanguard city which everybody wants to visit. Our series catches the hostility of the city, its gentrification, “touristification,” and the problem with flat rent prices, which are next to impossible.  Barcelona is a great place to raise a child if you have a lot of money. There’s the beach, parks, the climate. But we wanted “I Always Sometimes” to be full of nuance where the marvellous runs up against the hellish. And everybody in film can be good or bad at the same time and the series’ title also defines the city as well. It’s the ying and yang. Nobody is purely anything. Everybody is full of contradictions. What we like is to reflect and embrace them, those which can be worked on to become a better person…

    The series is described as a realistic vision of motherhood. It returns time and again to economic factors, which you don’t see so much in titles with women protagonists…

    Loza: The series talks about the difficulty of reconciling work and raising a child and enjoying that. 

    Borras: Neoliberalism is now so exacerbated that to live you have to put work at the center of your life when life should be at the center and work help you to be happier and live better.

    Laura (Ana Boga) juggling work and motherhood in ‘I Always Sometimes’

  • Analytics Firm Paints a Bleak Picture for an Altcoin: “I Don’t Want to Spread FUD, But…”

    Analytics Firm Paints a Bleak Picture for an Altcoin: “I Don’t Want to Spread FUD, But…”

    Hyperliquid ($HYPE), one of the prominent projects in the cryptocurrency markets, has recently come back into the spotlight with a noteworthy analysis. Michael Nadeau, an analyst at The DeFi Report, shared significant data pointing to a possible “bearish scenario” for $HYPE.

    According to Nadeau’s assessment, one of the biggest risks to the Hyperliquid ecosystem is capital outflows through the Arbitrum bridge. Approximately $500 million in funds have flown out of this bridge in the last few weeks. This indicates that investors are becoming more cautious, especially following a series of hacks in the DeFi sector.

    Related News Coinbase Shares the Most Critical Level for the Bitcoin Price

    Another element highlighted in the analysis was the structural characteristics of the Arbitrum/Hyperliquid bridge. Currently holding approximately $3.36 billion in assets, this bridge is managed by a structure consisting of only 24 validators. This relatively limited set of validators raises concerns about centralization and security risks for some investors.

    Nadeau specifically emphasized that these assessments were not intended to create “FUD” (fear, uncertainty, doubt), but noted that despite the positive developments in the ecosystem over the past year, such risks should not be ignored. According to the analyst, the current picture reveals that while there is a strong growth story for $HYPE, there are also structural risks that need to be considered.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Clock is ticking for bitcoin to prevent quantum threat as it could drain 6.9 million BTC including Satoshi’s

    Clock is ticking for bitcoin to prevent quantum threat as it could drain 6.9 million BTC including Satoshi’s

    Not everything in bitcoin is at risk from a quantum computer.

    Bitcoin mining, the process by which new blocks get added to the blockchain, uses a type of math called hashing that quantum computers cannot meaningfully break. The ledger itself and the rule that new bitcoin can only be created through mining would survive a quantum attacker. Blocks would still get produced, and the chain would keep running.

    What would not survive is ownership.

    Bitcoin wallets are protected by a different kind of math that turns a secret private key into a public address anyone can see. The math works easily in one direction and not at all in the other, which is the only thing stopping a stranger from spending your coins.

    Part 1 of this quantum computing series went into physics. A quantum computer is not a faster version of a regular computer. It is a fundamentally different kind of machine, starting at a very cold, very small loop of metal where particles behave in ways they do not behave anywhere else on Earth.

    Part 2 walked through what happens when you point that machine at bitcoin. Bitcoin wallets depend on a one-way math problem. Turning a secret private key into a public address takes milliseconds. Going the other way, from public address back to the private key, would take a regular computer longer than the age of the universe.

    A quantum algorithm called Shor’s collapses the gap. Google’s paper this month showed the attack could be run with far fewer resources than anyone previously estimated, in a window that races against bitcoin’s own block times.

    This piece, the last in the series, is about the response. What is actually at risk, what bitcoin has done about it, and whether a network built to resist coordinated change can coordinate the biggest security upgrade in its history before the hardware catches up.

    What’s exposed, what’s safe

    The at-risk pool is large.

    Roughly 6.9 million bitcoin, about one-third of everything ever mined, sits in wallets whose public keys are already permanently visible onchain. Most of this is early bitcoin from the network’s first years, stored in an address format that published the public key by default. It also includes any wallet that has ever been spent from, because spending reveals the key for whatever remains.

    A quantum attacker would not need to race against a transaction in progress. Rather, they could work through the wallets with already exposed keys at their own pace, one by one. Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, holds roughly 1 million bitcoin, untouched since the network’s early days, and this stack now sits in the exposed category.

    The 2021 Taproot upgrade expanded the problem. Taproot is a change to how bitcoin addresses work, intended to make transactions more efficient and more private.

    A side effect was that any bitcoin spent since Taproot activated has published the key protecting whatever remains at that address. This was not a mistake but a reasonable tradeoff at the time, when quantum timelines looked much longer than they do now.

    What’s in the works?

    While the quantum threat has sparked a heated debate in recent months, and other blockchains are preparing, nothing concrete has emerged from Bitcoin developers yet.

    Ethereum, which can be considered one of Bitcoin’s largest competitors among institutional investors looking at the crypto market, has had a formal quantum-resistant program since 2018.

    The Ethereum Foundation runs four teams working on the migration full-time, with more than ten independent developer groups shipping weekly test networks. The plan maps specific upgrades across four upcoming network-wide changes, moving Ethereum’s security to new math that quantum computers cannot break. It has even launched a dedicated website, pq.ethereum.org, to publish its progress.

    Bitcoin has no equivalent strategy so far.

    That doesn’t mean there aren’t any efforts out there to solve it.

    One such formal proposal is BIP-360 from a group of developers and researchers. It would add new quantum-safe address types that holders could voluntarily migrate to. A competing proposal from BitMEX Research would install a detection system that triggers defensive action if a quantum attack is observed on the network.

    However, neither has broad support from bitcoin’s core developers, and the two proposals solve different halves of the problem.

    Nic Carter, one of bitcoin’s prominent advocates, has called it out in the past months.

    “Elliptic curve cryptography is on the brink of obsolescence,” Carter wrote on X, referring to the math that secures bitcoin wallets. He described Ethereum’s approach as “best in class” and bitcoin’s as “worst in class,” citing developers who “deny, gaslight, gatekeep, bury heads in sand” rather than engage with the problem.

    Adam Back, the Blockstream CEO and a prominent early bitcoin contributor, disagrees on the urgency but agrees on the direction.

    “Quantum computing still has a lot to prove. Current systems are essentially lab experiments,” Back said at a conference earlier this month. But he also said bitcoin should prepare now, with optional upgrades built in advance so the network can migrate when needed, rather than scrambling in a crisis.

    The coordination problem

    So what’s the biggest challenge in implementing effective solutions against Bitcoin’s quantum threat?

    Bitcoin’s migration is harder than Ethereum’s for reasons unrelated to the actual math.

    Ethereum has a foundation that funds engineering work and a governance process that regularly passes major upgrades. Bitcoin has neither. Its development culture treats any central authority as a failure mode, and its social consensus holds that changes to the protocol should be rare and hard.

    Those priors have kept the network stable for nearly two decades, but they also make the quantum problem structurally harder for bitcoin to solve.

    Migrating the 6.9 million exposed coins requires decisions the network has spent twenty years avoiding. Should old address formats be frozen after a certain date to protect coins from future theft? Should exposed coins be allowed to move to new quantum-safe addresses using their original keys? What happens to coins whose owners cannot or will not migrate?

    Satoshi’s coins are the sharpest example. Freezing old formats protects the coins from theft but makes them permanently inaccessible, including to Satoshi. Leaving the old formats open means those coins sit as a standing prize for whoever builds the first working quantum computer or has access to a quantum computer and wants to attack.

    Setting a migration deadline forces Satoshi to either move the coins, revealing their ownership, or lose them. Every option changes bitcoin’s character in ways the network has historically refused to change it.

    What happens next

    The Google paper’s own framing is a summary of where the industry stands.

    A successful attack on the math bitcoin uses “should not be seen as a wake-up call to adopt post-quantum cryptography as much as a potential signal that PQC adoption has already failed.”

    This means that by the time the threat becomes visible, the window to respond may already have closed.

    Developers now face a question of whether a network built to resist coordinated change can coordinate the biggest security upgrade in its history before the hardware catches up to the theory.

    Ethereum’s eight-year head start suggests the correct answer is to start now. Bitcoin’s governance culture suggests the likely answer is to wait until the threat is demonstrated, then move.

    Only one of those answers works if the timeline turns out to be shorter than the optimists’ estimate.