Author: rb809rb

  • Bruno Mars Makes a Leisure Suit of a Record With ‘The Romantic,’ Doubling Down on Silk Sonic’s Hermetically Sealed ’70s Revivalism: Album Review

    Bruno Mars Makes a Leisure Suit of a Record With ‘The Romantic,’ Doubling Down on Silk Sonic’s Hermetically Sealed ’70s Revivalism: Album Review

    When it rains reigning male pop superstars, it pours. The boys are back in town, and two of the three or four biggest guys in the recording business, Bruno Mars and Harry Styles, are coincidentally releasing albums on back-to-back weekends, as if teaming up to storm the barricades mostly held in recent years by pop’s girl bosses. So it’s interesting to see what these two alphas are bringing along as stylistic arsenals in their attempts to reassert some dominance, or at least parity. Coming next week is Styles’ intriguingly titled “Kiss All the Time. Disco, Occasionally,” and we’ll find out soon enough whether Harry means to use the D-word there literally or just figuratively.

    But for Mars’ first solo album in 10 years, “The Romantic,” it is as if disco never happened. It is a time machine back to the mid-1970s, just before dance music took over, with a heavy, heavy emphasis on retro-soul balladry. The album ends with a song called “Dance With Me,” but it’s a song dedicated to slow dancing, just like the surprisingly slow-simmering track that opens the album. When the pace does get upped a couple of times, it’s to bring us up to the tempo of the O’Jays, not to snap us back to the time of J. Cole. There’s not a moment on the whole nine-song collection that sounds like it was minted any more freshly than 1976. It’s already been well-established that the album’s first single (and one of its few bangers), “I Just Might,” reminds folks a little of Leo Sayer’s “You Make Me Feel Like Dancing,” which came out that year. So, truly, here, Mars is Bicentennial Man.

    Given how unhappy many people are with 2026, a trip headed exactly 50 years back into the past will be a welcome ride for a lot of hitchhikers. But will you ultimately find “The Romantic” compelling as anything much more than a mood ring… er, mood piece? The best predictor for that will be how much you loved or liked “An Evening With Silk Sonic,” the similarly throwback album Mars put out with Anderson .Paak four and a half years ago. (How time flies when you’re arresting it!) Paak has moved on, but Mars is remaining committed to the bit — really, really committed. It takes some nerve, after a full decade of not putting out a solo album, when that last solo record was a Grammy winner for album of the year (“24k Gold”), to return with something that is completely beholden to styles that went out of fashion before you were born. But it’s slightly less nervy if you think of it more in terms of sticking with the formula that last brought you an album-sized smash. This is “Silk Sonic II,” for most intents and purposes.

    I am part of the target audience for “The Romantic,” as an admitted nostalgist who thinks the 1970s was a golden era for just about everything but gas lines. But I’m also not part of the target audience, inasmuch as I don’t prefer the homages to past eras to be completely hermetically sealed, without even slight nods to what has transpired since, let alone an attempt to bring them a little bit into the future. I think “The Romantic” is actually better than “An Evening With Silk Sonic,” in several quantifiable ways, including its bold emphasis on ballads, where you really get to hear Mars test what he can do with those pipes, which is a lot. And there’s something even craftier about how well he, his extremely talented co-producer, D-Mile, and his band, the Hooligans, have replicated the exact feel of a great era in record-making. But, among these two albums, it does have the disadvantage of coming second. The album is great as a stunt, but, slightly refined or not, it’s the second time in a row doing what amounts to the same stunt. You can admire his ability to reverse-engineer the cool sounds of his forefathers, but that doesn’t mean you’re going to be moved by it.

    Especially when, once you get past admiring the encyclopedic knowledge of ’70s flourishes, you realize there’s not really much in the way of great songs here. Nearly everything sounds like a possible candidate for a followup single to “I Just Might,” but nothing jumps out as the pick. There’s actually a decent amount of sub-genre variation from song to song, but emotionally, it’s kind of a flat-line, with the most perfunctory lyrics you will hear on any album this year. There never seems to be even a remote possibility that Mars is telling us anything about his real life amid all the fill-in-the-blank cliches (“The fire don’t burn like it used to, girl”; “Let’s go to the moon a little later / Hope your wings get to fly”; “Turns out you don’t need a rocket ship, no / To find your own shooting star”). So, in the age of hyper-autobiographical pop, “The Romantic” feels weirdly and completely impersonal, unless you consider extreme pastiche a personality. It’s like a fun costume party where you never find out who actually attended. Although, to be fair, Curtis Mayfield is a hell of a mask, right?

    One thing that’s kind of interesting, though, is a Latin current that ebbs and flows through a few pieces of the record, starting with the album cover itself, which features hand-written lettering that is meant to remind oldsters of a golden age of Chicano rock. The first couple of tracks seem to be headed toward a concept album in that direction. “Risk It All” is the aforementioned kick-off that really does feel like a bit of a risk, not just because it starts off the album on a slow, pleading note with acoustic guitar plucking and some of Mars’ most supple vocals. There are horns through a lot of the record, but in this number, they’re played as mariachi horns. (It also has arguably the album’s most vapid lyrics — “I would swim across the sea just to show you / Sacrifice my life just to hold you,” et al. — but never mind those.) He ups the Latin quotient with the tenser rhythms and strings and congas of the second track, “Cha Cha Cha”; maybe the title is a giveaway. (On the non-Latin tip, it also interpolates Juvenile’s’s 2004 “Slow Motion,” a nice combo.) But these Latin flavors turn out not to be a constant through the rest of the album. They do return in one of the most up-tempo tracks, “Something Serious,” a fairly direct cop of “Oye Como Va,” which is fun until you start thinking about how the chorus is not that special and you’d rather be listening to “Oye Como Va.”

    After the third number, “I Just Might,” snaps you to attention with its booty-shake-or-go-home machismo, the fourth, “God Was Showing Off,” is when it really settles into the groove where Mars is most comfortable these days, bridging the gap between Motown and Philly soul. “Why You Wanna Fight?” almost sounds like a parody of some of these genres, with a backing chorus repeatedly and dramatically cooing whyyouwannafight as a single word, in-between the singer’s more extenuated phrases. “On My Soul” and “Nothing Left” bring in some welcome electric guitar licks. Most of the tracks that follow will make you think of the kind of vintage Top 40/AC soul where it’s summertime and the listenin’ is EZ.

    Overall, it’s an album that seems designed to be background music, which is not entirely meant as an insult; there’s an art to making music that can be put on at literally almost any party and suit the tastes of grandmas as well as kids, and serve that function for a couple of years or more. But if you were planning to foreground “The Romantic,” this one may have a more limited shelf life. As a leisure suit of a record, this is not really album-of-the-year material, like “24K Magic” was. It’s not even meant to be that kind of tour de force, to be fair, but it’s also probably not meant to be quite this in-one-ear-and-out-the-other. How can vocals be as bountifully impressive as Mars’ are here and still leave you thinking that there’s no lived experience in any of the songs?

    This really is a “romantic” album, but what’s missing is the sensation that the material has any tangible connection to actual love. Unless love for early Kool & the Gang counts.

  • Pokémon Winds and Waves are coming to Switch 2 in 2027

    The Pokémon leakers were right: the Gen 10 games are called Pokémon Wind and Pokémon Waves. The Pokémon Company confirmed the titles during a 30th anniversary stream on Pokémon Day. The games are set to hit Nintendo Switch 2 in 2027. (A Game Freak leak last October suggested Wind and Waves would be out this year with DLC to follow in 2027.)

    According to the Pokémon account on X, in Wind and Waves, “you’ll travel across beautiful windswept islands and a vast ocean with glittering waves that ebb and flow. You’ll also team up with Pokémon to overcome challenges and even the forces of nature!” They’ll be playable in 11 languages, including Brazilian Portuguese.

    A trailer for the two games revealed the three new starter Pokémon: Browt, Pombon and Gecqua. As suggested by their colors and environments they’re shown in, they are grass, fire and water types, respectively. Other Pokémon that were featured include Pikachu (sporting fetching beachwear) and Oddish. The trailer, which reveals a new region for the series, ends by taking us into the ocean to gawk at an number of water Pokémon.

    The Pokémon Presents stream on Friday included updates for many other games in the franchise, including the battle-focused Pokémon Champions (a modern spin on the likes of Pokémon Stadium). That will debut on Nintendo Switch in April before arriving on iOS and Android later this year. Cross-play will be available between the three platforms. It was also confirmed that Pokémon XD: Gale of Darkness will hit the GameCube library on Nintendo Switch Online + Expansion Pack on Switch 2 in March.

    Pokémon Day marks the 30th anniversary of the series’ debut with the 1996 release of Pocket Monsters Red and Pocket Monsters Green (later released as Pokémon Red and Pokémon Blue in the West) on Game Boy in Japan. The games were remade for GameBoy Advance in 2004 as Pokémon FireRed Version and Pokémon LeafGreen Version. Starting today, those are available on Switch and Switch 2 for $20 each. Meanwhile, Pokémon Pokopia, a cozy life sim spin-off, will hit Switch 2 on March 5.

  • Celebrate Pokémon’s 30th anniversary with this Game Boy-shaped music player

    Celebrate Pokémon’s 30th anniversary with this Game Boy-shaped music player

    Pokémon celebrates its 30th anniversary today, and as you’d expect, Nintendo and The Pokémon Company are cranking up the nostalgia in every possible way. In addition to re-releasing the Game Boy Advance remakes of Pokémon Red and Blue on Nintendo Switch Online, they’re also selling us a Game Boy-shaped portable Pokémon jukebox.

    Officially titled the Pokémon Game Music Collection, the little music player is palm-sized and can be loaded up with 45 different cartridges, each featuring a different melody or sound effect from the original games’ soundtrack. The device was announced by longtime series composer Junichi Masuda during today’s anniversary Pokémon Presents livestream, where he said that special care has gone into the audio sounding like it did on the Game Boy.

    Each cartridge also features a screenshot from the games, so when you slide it into the device’s display slot it looks like you’re playing as well as listening. Put one of these next to last year’s equally charming Lego Game Boy on a shelf and you’ve got two entirely non-playable replicas of the iconic handheld, which is sure to confuse and disappoint your guests in equal measure.

    The Pokémon Game Music Collection is available to buy from Pokémon Center starting today, but US pricing is yet to be confirmed.

  • New Day, New Ethereum Price Warning — But Why Is $1 Billion Still Betting Higher?

    New Day, New Ethereum Price Warning — But Why Is $1 Billion Still Betting Higher?

    Ethereum price is down about 1.4% over the past 24 hours, extending its broader weakness. At first glance, this looks like a routine pullback inside a consolidation phase. But this decline did not appear randomly. It came right after a warning signal flashed on the daily chart, suggesting the recent recovery may already be losing steam.

    What makes this moment unusual is the reaction from traders. Instead of reducing risk, leveraged long positions have surged past $1 billion. This creates a dangerous contradiction. The same conditions that are warning of a deeper drop are also attracting aggressive bullish bets. This disconnect could now decide Ethereum’s next major move.

    Bearish Divergence And Supply Cluster Are Now Pointing To The Same Risk

    The first warning sign appeared through a hidden bearish divergence on the daily chart. Between January 21 and February 25, the Ethereum price formed a lower high. This means the recent recovery was weaker than the previous rally, confirming the broader downtrend remains intact.

    At the same time, the Relative Strength Index (RSI), which measures momentum strength, formed a higher high. This creates a hidden bearish divergence. This pattern usually appears during downtrends and signals that the recovery is only temporary, with the larger decline likely to continue.

    Hidden Bearish Divergence

    Hidden Bearish Divergence: TradingView

    Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

    This signal becomes more important because Ethereum is already down about 32% over the past 30 days. That confirms the broader structure remains bearish. Now, on-chain data shows where this pullback could accelerate.

    The Ethereum cost basis heatmap reveals a major support cluster between $1,870 and $1,890. Around 1.40 million $ETH was accumulated in this range. This level is important because it represents the average buying zone for a large group of holders.

    These holders are still in profit at current prices. But if Ethereum falls into this zone while fear increases, many may sell to protect their gains. This could weaken support and allow the pullback to deepen.

    Cost Basis Cluster: Glassnode

    This makes the divergence warning more dangerous as a key support lies nearby.

    Whale Selling And $1 Billion Long Exposure Create A Dangerous Conflict

    At the same time, large holders are starting to show caution.

    Ethereum supply held by whales has dropped slightly from 113.41 million $ETH on February 25 to 113.39 million $ETH now. This is not a large drop, somewhere in the $40 million range, but it confirms that whales are no longer aggressively accumulating.

    This matters because whale activity often signals future price direction. When whales stop buying or begin selling, it weakens market confidence. But derivatives traders are reacting in the opposite way.

    <span class=$ETH Whales”>

    $ETH Whales: Santiment

    Binance liquidation data shows cumulative long leverage has crossed $1 billion. Short leverage, in comparison, sits near $382 million. This means long exposure is nearly three times higher. Even more importantly, nearly $697 million of long leverage is concentrated near $1,870. Per the map, the risk starts developing if the $ETH price drops under $2,015.

    Liquidation Map

    Liquidation Map: Coinglass

    This level aligns almost perfectly with the cost basis cluster starting near $1,870. This creates a high-risk situation.

    If Ethereum falls into this zone, holders may begin selling while leveraged long positions are forced to close. These forced liquidations would push the price even lower and accelerate the correction. That risk could be the reason why whales have stepped back, for now.

    But despite these risks, traders are still betting on a breakout. The reason becomes clear in Ethereum’s price structure itself.

    Ethereum Price Structure Explains Both The $2,600 Hope And The Breakdown Risk

    Ethereum’s recent price structure is creating the optimism that derivatives traders are betting on. On the 8-hour chart, Ethereum is forming a cup and handle pattern. This is a bullish structure that often appears before upward breakouts.

    The handle is forming now as a consolidation phase, something that the traders might be considering as a lull before the breakout.

    The neckline of this pattern is sloping upward. An upward-sloping neckline strengthens breakout expectations, provided the price can break past key resistance levels. The critical ones are now revealed by the technical projections.

    <span class=$ETH Price Structure”>

    $ETH Price Structure: TradingView

    If Ethereum breaks above $2,140, the pattern breakout hopes rise. While the neckline will still be at a distance, the hopes of a 17% rally toward $2,600 would surface. This upside potential possibly explains why traders continue opening long positions despite growing warning signs.

    But this optimism depends entirely on Ethereum holding its support levels. If Ethereum falls below $1,990, weakness begins increasing, although the pattern still survives.

    A drop below $1,890 would become much more serious. This level sits directly at the top of the cost basis cluster between $1,870 and $1,890. Losing this zone would weaken holder confidence and expose Ethereum to a deeper decline.

    Below $1,820, the bullish structure would begin failing. If Ethereum falls below $1,790, the cup and handle pattern would be invalidated completely. This would remove the bullish setup and could trigger large-scale long liquidations.

    Ethereum Price Analysis

    Ethereum Price Analysis: TradingView

    That is why the same price structure attracting $1 billion in bullish bets is also sitting directly above the most dangerous breakdown zone. Recovery is still possible. But Ethereum must break above $2,140 first. Until then, Ethereum remains stuck between breakout hope and breakdown risk.

    The post New Day, New Ethereum Price Warning — But Why Is $1 Billion Still Betting Higher? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

  • US Judge Rejects Binance’s Arbitration Request in Case Involving 7 Altcoins! Here Are the Details

    US Judge Rejects Binance’s Arbitration Request in Case Involving 7 Altcoins! Here Are the Details

    Binance received bad news from the US. A US judge rejected Binance’s arbitration request.

    District Judge Andrew Carter of the Southern District of New York ruled that Binance does not have the authority to compel U.S. users to arbitrate for damages arising from cryptocurrency purchases made on its platform before February 20, 2019.

    However, the judge ruled that the ongoing class action lawsuit would be heard publicly in federal court.

    Therefore, customers who accuse Binance of selling unregistered tokens will be able to pursue damages claims arising before February 20, 2019, in court.

    The judge, in his review, found that Binance unilaterally updated its Terms of Use in 2019, amending the terms to include a waiver of the right to arbitration and the right to class action, without notifying customers of this change.

    The ruling also stated that there was no evidence that Binance had announced the arbitration order or explained to customers where this order could be found in its terms of use.

    According to the judge, since the terms of use in 2017 did not include arbitration or class action waiver provisions, the changes made in 2019 cannot be applied retroactively to claims relating to periods prior to that date.

    The class-action lawsuit known as Williams v. Binance was filed by five US investors from California, Nevada, and Texas, alleging that Binance and its founder, CZ, illegally sold unregistered securities and failed to register as brokerage firms. The lawsuit was dismissed in 2022, but in 2024 the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals remanded it back to the lower court.

    In the retrial, Judge Carter rejected Binance’s request for arbitration, while Binance stated that the plaintiffs had voluntarily withdrawn claims arising after February 20, 2019, and that the company would continue to defend against the remaining claims.

    This decision allows users to file lawsuits for damages incurred before February 20, 2019, and for the case to be heard publicly. Altcoins named in the lawsuit include ELF, EOS, FUN, ICX, OMG, QSP, and TRX.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Got a Public Amazon Wishlist? Upcoming Change Could Reveal Your Address

    Got a Public Amazon Wishlist? Upcoming Change Could Reveal Your Address

    Honest, Objective, Lab-Tested Reviews

    PCMag.com is a leading authority on technology, delivering lab-based, independent reviews of the latest
    products and services. Our expert industry analysis and practical solutions help you make better buying
    decisions and get more from technology.

  • ‘Jestermaxxing’ is bizarre new trend following on from people hitting their faces with hammers

    ‘Jestermaxxing’ is bizarre new trend following on from people hitting their faces with hammers

    Jestermaxxing is the latest term to make its way onto the internet, with the bizarre trend yet another that’s come about thanks to the manosphere.

    If you’re fortunate enough to not be aware of the strange culture which is affecting young men across the world, then buckle up, because I’m about to explain this bizarre trend as best as I can.

    Essentially, streamers online are attempting to influence young men into believing that violence against women is justified because women are ‘evil’, with their value as a human entirely dependent on their attractiveness, which is obviously nonsense, but some men are lapping it up because of their struggles with the opposite sex. The worrying trend is also explored in the hit Netflix series Adolescence.

    This sometimes involves coming up with strange new words, whether it’s ‘looksmaxxing’ which gives you terrible advice about looking your best, while ‘framemogging’ involves looking more muscular than another man.

    One thing those in incel culture aren’t too keen on is ‘jestermaxxing’, which essentially involves having fun and cracking jokes as a way of making yourself seem more entertaining, with some influencers in the manosphere warning against having fun at all costs.

    Jestermaxxing is the real key to romantic success (Getty Stock)

    Jestermaxxing is the real key to romantic success (Getty Stock)

    While it might be frowned upon in incel culture, jestermaxxing sounds alarmingly similar to my method with the opposite gender for most of my adult life, although obviously my devilish good looks also helped in landing me such a wonderful partner.

    Certainly, most sensible folks would argue that acting silly and making a woman laugh is far more likely to increase her attraction to you than admitting to hitting yourself in the face with a hammer, but that ridiculous tactic is seen as transformative by some of the main authorities in the manosphere.

    That’s exactly what popular streamer Clavicular has been recommending recently, with the young American applying Wolff’s Law in completely the wrong way, as he claims that controlled stress to his cheekbones is the best way of ‘looksmaxxing’ – yet another strange trend that this internet group seems to abide by.

    This is not going to make you better looking (Kick/Clavicular)

    This is not going to make you better looking (Kick/Clavicular)

    In a Kick video, he can be heard telling a bemused police officer: “Do you guys know about bone-smashing? It’s according to Wolff’s Law, so when you break down a bone it grows back stronger. So I’m trying to grow my cheekbones.”

    Naturally, if you want to have a successful and healthy relationship, you should probably do the exact opposite of what the likes of Andrew Tate and HSTikkyTokky are suggesting, given a significant percentage of their content revolves around hating women.

    However, a quick glance at Clavicular’s content seems to suggest that he’s shifted his focus in recent weeks, with the streamer more open to the idea of ‘jestermaxxing’ and actually enjoying his life. Good for him I say.

  • There’s a New DeFi Bill in Congress—What Does That Mean for Crypto Market Structure?

    There’s a New DeFi Bill in Congress—What Does That Mean for Crypto Market Structure?

    In brief

    • A bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced a bill to protect non-custodial crypto developers from criminal prosecution.
    • The bill would amend a criminal code used to convict multiple crypto developers last year.
    • While similar protections may appear in a broader crypto market structure bill, the bill may not pass this year.

    A bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced a bill Thursday that would exempt certain decentralized software developers from criminal liability.

    With crypto’s stalled market structure bill poised to contain similar language, what does the bill’s introduction mean for the state of privacy-focused crypto legislation in Washington?

    The new bill goes further than similar language currently being debated in market structure legislation—but should not be seen as an indication that the market structure bill’s language on developer protections is too weak, nor that the market structure bill itself is doomed, a source familiar with the thinking behind the new bill told Decrypt.

    The new bill, dubbed the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act, would formally amend the language of a U.S. criminal statute that has been successfully used—by both the Joe Biden administration and the current Donald Trump administration—to prosecute crypto software developers.

    The statue, U.S. code 1960, defines an illegal money transmitting business. Today’s legislation would amend the code to ensure it applies only to individuals who “exercise control over currency.” It was introduced in the House today by Reps. Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI), Ben Cline (R-VA), and Zoe Lofgren (D-CA).

    Last year, an Ethereum software developer was found guilty by a Manhattan jury of violating code 1960 for developing a crypto privacy tool called Tornado Cash. The developer argued that because the software was decentralized, and he did not take custody of user funds, he should not be considered the operator of an illegal money transmitting business.

    Some months later, the Trump Department of Justice secured guilty pleas under code 1960 from two Bitcoin software developers who created a similar platform called Samourai Wallet. The developers are both currently serving sentences in federal prison.

    “This bill is critically important for engineers,” the DeFi Education Fund, an industry advocacy group, said today of the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act.

    “It makes it clear that software developers who do not take custody of or control other people’s money can build neutral technology, here at home, without worrying about being criminally prosecuted as if they are a financial intermediary,” the group said.

    The crypto market structure bill is likely to include language addressing code 1960—but not language that actually rewrites the statute itself. The language would, instead, order that “non-controlling developer[s]” not be treated as engaged in money transmitting under code 1960. 

    Language in the bill surrounding decentralized finance, or DeFi, is currently in relative flux, however, as lawmakers and industry stakeholders attempt to salvage the legislation after months of delays. DeFi refers to the collection of financial applications that exist natively on blockchain networks, circumventing the need for third-party intermediaries such as banks.

    DeFi language in the bill, though, while not finalized, is unlikely to be the hill the bill dies on, sources familiar with the matter told Decrypt. Industry leaders and the banking lobby are currently locked in another disagreement regarding stablecoin rewards, while Senate Democrats and the White House remain at an impasse on language regarding conflicts of interest and President Trump’s numerous crypto ventures.

    Lawmakers have urged that the bill needs to see significant progress in the coming weeks, or it risks falling by the wayside as Congress grinds to a halt in the spring ahead of November’s midterms.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Block Stock Pops as Jack Dorsey’s Bitcoin, Payments Company Dumps 4,000 Jobs

    Block Stock Pops as Jack Dorsey’s Bitcoin, Payments Company Dumps 4,000 Jobs

    In brief

    • Block expects most restructuring charges to land in the first quarter, driven by severance and share-based compensation costs.
    • The company employed just over 10,200 workers at the end of 2025, highlighting the scale of the workforce reduction.
    • Block’s business spans consumer and merchant payments through Cash App and Square, alongside a growing Bitcoin operation tied to trading and payments.

    Jack Dorsey’s Block Inc said it will cut more than 4,000 jobs, over 40% of its workforce, as part of a broad restructuring unveiled alongside its fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 earnings.

    Shares of the New York Stock Exchange-listed payments company jumped more than 23% in after-hours trading, Yahoo Finance data shows.

    The scale of the layoffs places Block among the companies carrying out the largest workforce reductions in the fintech sector so far this year, as payments and financial technology firms grapple with slower growth, tighter capital conditions, and increased scrutiny of operating costs.

    In a 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, Block said the workforce reduction is intended to better align its organizational structure with its “operating model and strategic priorities.”

    Block said it expects to record between $450 million and $500 million in restructuring charges, largely related to severance, notice-period pay, employee benefits, and other cash costs, as well as non-cash expenses tied to the vesting of share-based awards. 

    Most of the charges are expected to be recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 2026, with the restructuring largely completed by the end of the second quarter.

    The company cautioned that the estimates are based on assumptions and that actual costs could differ materially.

    As of the end of 2025, Block employed just over 10,200 full-time workers globally, according to its 10-K annual filing with the regulator, underscoring the scale of the cuts.

    Cash App had 59 million monthly transacting users in the U.S. at year-end, bringing in $316 billion of customer inflows during 2025.

    Block’s core business spans consumer and merchant payments through Cash App and Square, alongside a long-running push into Bitcoin products, including trading, self-custody, and merchant payments.

    Block now reports its business across three revenue categories: commerce enablement, financial services, and its Bitcoin ecosystem, which together generated $10.4 billion in gross profit in 2025, per its annual filing.

    Block said it would hold an earnings conference call and webcast later Thursday to discuss its results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2025.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • ‘Love Story’ Star Sarah Pidgeon on Recreating JFK Jr. and Carolyn Bessette’s Infamous Battery Park Fight

    [This story contains spoilers from Love Story, episode five, “Battery Park.”]

    While Love Story: John F. Kennedy Jr. & Carolyn Bessette is, at its core, a romance, it doesn’t shy away from the couple’s most painful moments.

    Thursday night’s episode, “Battery Park,” revisits one of their most infamous: the heated 1996 argument after they left their Tribeca apartment at 20 N. Moore St. and walked to Battery Park. Though the time period was before smartphones and viral TikTok videos, paparazzi captured the fight on camera, and the footage was featured on tabloid front pages.

    In Love Story, the episode imagines what may have led to that very public unraveling. Over the Fourth of July weekend in 1995, John (Paul Anthony Kelly) proposes to Carolyn (Sarah Pidgeon) during a fishing trip on Martha’s Vineyard. She doesn’t immediately accept. Unsure whether she’s prepared to become Mrs. JFK Jr., Carolyn asks for time.

    Her hesitation, exacerbated by relentless tabloid scrutiny and the pressures of sudden public attention, and her belief that John lets people walk all over him, begin to strain their relationship. When John issues a statement denying that he proposed, it worsens. The episode suggests that mistrust ultimately erupts into the now-famous Battery Park fight, where the pair are shown screaming at one another and John appearing to yank off Carolyn’s engagement ring before she lunges toward him — all of it caught on video.

    Still, Pidgeon acknowledges that viewers should take the recreated dialogue with a grain of salt.

    “You know, who knows what they really said in these moments,” Pidgeon tells The Hollywood Reporter. “That certainly was a private moment that, unfortunately, was captured on film.”

    Regardless of the scene’s exact accuracy, Pidgeon describes filming it as a rewarding challenge.

    “It was quite exciting as an actor, especially approaching Carolyn, where there is so much mystery in how she sounds and how she walks when she knows she’s not being filmed in the photos taken by a friend versus a paparazzo,” she says. “Having a few moments where we actually had video footage — whether it be Battery Park or their first public photo as a couple when they come out of North Moore [Street] — it was really exciting to come at the scene through her physicality.”

    After moving from the park to a bench and eventually to a nearby street curb, the episode shows the couple talking through the fractures in their relationship. An emotional John pleads, “Why can’t we just love each other? Why does it have to be so hard?”

    They ultimately confront what each needs to make the relationship work. Carolyn struggles to adjust to life in the public eye, while John insists he doesn’t want to change her.

    “I don’t want to bring you into my world. I want you to pull me out of it. I want you to be my family,” he tells her.

    When Carolyn receives reassurance that John has no desire to follow in his father’s footsteps and pursue the presidency, she experiences a breakthrough. Though she never imagined herself as someone’s wife, she realizes she wants that future — because it’s with him. The episode ends with Carolyn accepting his proposal and crying in his arms, mirroring another iconic image of the couple.

    Speaking with THR ahead of the series premiere, Pidgeon reflected on filming both the emotional lows — like the Battery Park argument — and the joyful highs, including the wedding depicted in next week’s episode.

    “I think high, energetic, joyful scenes can be just as difficult as the emotionally taxing crying — the lowest points,” she says. “The extremes of emotion can be hard. It’s quite vulnerable to be completely joyous. Because when you’re joyous, you’re not watching yourself when you really smile. It’s different from when you’re putting on a smile.”

    Executive producer Brad Simpson also noted an unexpected parallel between the actors’ experience and the real-life scrutiny Carolyn and John faced. Even during filming, paparazzi surrounded the production.

    “It was really hard on our actors, because they were in a situation where we were being stalked by paparazzi, just like Carolyn was. We had 17 paparazzi out in front of us,” he says. “When you see a scene of their first date in the first episode, you should know that seven feet away, there are photographers outside our barrier, snapping pictures like crazy. It was a lot for her to go through, and, weirdly, it mirrored Carolyn Bessette’s journey — from being unknown to suddenly being criticized for her every move.”

    ***

    The first five episodes of Love Story are now streaming on Hulu and Disney+, with new episodes of the nine-episode series to premiere on Thursdays at 6 p.m. PT/9 p.m. ET on FX/Hulu. Read THR‘s interviews with the stars and creatives hereSarah Pidgeon‘s Next Big Thing feature, Paul Anthony Kelly’s episode three postmortem and more coverage here.