Author: rb809rb

  • ‘Hamnet’ Spoofed in ‘SNL U.K.’ Sketch in Which Shakespeare Returns From London With Ketamine, ‘Team Anne Boleyn’ Tote and ‘C—y Little Earring’

    ‘Hamnet’ Spoofed in ‘SNL U.K.’ Sketch in Which Shakespeare Returns From London With Ketamine, ‘Team Anne Boleyn’ Tote and ‘C—y Little Earring’

    A very different version of William Shakespeare showed up in the first episode of “SNL U.K,” appearing in a sketch that took comic aim at the biggest British film from this year’s awards season.

    In “SNL U.K.’s” version of “Hamnet,” an increasingly Gen-Z hipster Bard returns home from staging plays in London to his doting wife (played by Tina Fey) and family.

    “Dost thou not think I appear changed?” he asks on his first time back home. “I got a cunty little earring!”

    Later returns to the family home see him on an electric scooter, brandishing a tote bag saying ‘Team Anne Boleyn,’ and proudly showing off “me slutty little chain.”

    “London hath changed thee,” Fey’s Agnes Hathaway asserts.

    “Thou art in Stratford upon Avon, and I’ve been in London upon ketamine,” says Shakespeare. “I’m like Charlie Xcx, sorry, Charlie 10 100 10. I’m in my glow up era, honey.”

    In keeping with the plot of the film, Hamnet is seen falling ill, having “taken the powder” from a new purse. But as Shakespeare notes: “He’ll be fine. Tis but a K-hole.”

    Following the “Hamnet” sketch, “SNL U.K.” poked fun at another beloved British institution in a skit in which a Paddington Bear immersive experience sees an actual bear let loose upon guests.

    “That was amazing. I’ve lost half my face,” says one. “I always thought that three kids was a bit too many, and now I’ve got the optimum amount … none!,” adds another.

    “In retrospect, maybe hot glue-gunning the hat to the bear’s head may have made it more angry,” explains Fay’s experience organiser. “I’m taking it to Broadway regardless”

    Studiocanal, which has the rights to Paddington Bear and has its very own Paddington experience in London, has already sued the makers of comedy show “Spitting Image” over their depiction of the bear as a drug-taking, foul-mouthed podcast host. It’ll be interesting to see what they make of this one.

  • InterLink Crosses 7 Million Verified Users After Adding One Million in a Single Month

    InterLink Crosses 7 Million Verified Users After Adding One Million in a Single Month

    InterLink has crossed 7 million verified human users. The network added its most recent million users in just over a month, accelerating from the 6 million milestone rather than slowing down after it.

    🎉 INTERLINK SURPASSES 7 MILLION REAL USERS

    🚀 From 6M+ to 7M+ verified humans in just over one month – this isn’t just momentum, it’s acceleration.

    Seven million is not just a number. It represents seven million verified identities. Seven million real individuals actively… pic.twitter.com/drp9Qcf0AQ

    — InterLink Labs 👤 + 🌐 (@inter_link) March 21, 2026

    The announcement confirms that growth isn’t tapering and that the network is now preparing the next phase of activity, including new events, recognition mechanisms for verified users, and additional pathways for participation and value creation within the ecosystem.

    What Seven Million Verified Users Actually Means

    The number that matters here isn’t just the big total. It’s the verification layer underneath it. InterLink’s user count represents verified human identities, not wallets, not accounts that could be bots, not addresses spun up to farm rewards.

    Seven million real individuals who have gone through an identity verification process and are actively participating in the network.

    That distinction is genuinely hard to achieve at scale. Most crypto projects report wallet addresses or app downloads. InterLink is reporting verified humans, which is a different and significantly harder metric to inflate. Adding a million verified users in just over a month means the verification process isn’t scaring people off.

    Most identity checks add enough friction to kill momentum. InterLink’s onboarding is apparently not doing that.

    What’s Driving the Adoption

    Growing from some baseline to 6 million takes time. Adding the next million in just over a month is a different kind of momentum. Networks tend to slow as they scale because the easiest users to reach get reached first, and subsequent growth requires more effort per user. InterLink’s trajectory is running the other way, with the most recent million arriving faster than earlier cohorts.

    That kind of acceleration in a verified identity network has compounding implications. Each new verified user makes the network more valuable to the users already in it. Trust-based networks, where participants know they are interacting with real people rather than bots or anonymous wallets, become more useful as the participant pool grows.

    Seven million verified humans is large enough to support meaningful economic activity, collaborative events, and social coordination that wouldn’t work at smaller scales.

    What Comes Next for the InterLink Network

    InterLink is using the 7 million milestone as a launchpad rather than a finish line. The announcement outlines three specific directions for the next phase.

    A new wave of events will roll out for the user base. Special mechanisms are being prepared to recognize and enhance the value of verified users specifically. And new pathways will be introduced for users to participate, contribute, and unlock value within the ecosystem.

    The language around these announcements is deliberately broad, but the direction is clear. The network is moving from a growth phase focused on user acquisition into an activation phase focused on what verified users can actually do and earn within the system. Identity verification was the foundation. The question now is what gets built on top of it.

    The framing of verified identity as a prerequisite for real trust and real value is central to InterLink’s thesis. A network full of real people operates differently from one full of anonymous wallets and bots. Rewards actually mean something when they land with a human on the other side.

    Contributions carry more weight when the contributor is a verified identity. Events and coordination mechanisms work differently when participants can trust who they are interacting with.

    Why Verified Identity Networks Are Worth Watching

    The broader context for InterLink’s growth is a crypto ecosystem that has struggled persistently with Sybil attacks, bot farming, and anonymous wallet proliferation that distorts participation metrics and reward distribution. Projects that solve identity verification at scale are addressing a foundational problem that affects almost every other layer of Web3 participation.

    Reaching 7 million verified users with such huge adoption still building puts InterLink in a small group of projects that have actually demonstrated this at a meaningful scale. The next phase, activating those identities through events, recognition mechanisms, and new participation pathways, will determine whether the network converts its user base into durable economic activity.

    Conclusion

    Seven million verified humans in a single network is a number that doesn’t have many comparables in crypto. The acceleration from 6 million to 7 million in a month matters more than the total itself. InterLink is now moving from building its user base to activating it, and the mechanisms being prepared for verified users will determine whether this milestone becomes a foundation or just a headline.

  • Bitcoin drops below $69,200 as Trump gives 48-hour ultimatum on Iran power plants

    Bitcoin has given back last week’s gains in a single weekend.

    The largest cryptocurrency slid to $69,192 on Sunday morning, down 2.2% over the past 24 hours and 3.1% on the week, after U.S. president Donald Trump issued a 48-hour ultimatum to Iran late Saturday demanding the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz or face attacks on the country’s power plants.

    Trump said he would “hit and obliterate” Iran’s power plants, beginning with the largest, if the strait wasn’t opened to commercial shipping.

    The threat marks a dramatic escalation from Friday, when Trump said he was thinking about “winding down” the military operation. Going from winding down to threatening civilian infrastructure in 24 hours whipsawed a market that had spent the previous week building confidence around de-escalation.

    The liquidation data shows how one-sided the positioning was heading into the weekend. CoinGlass data shows $299 million in total liquidations over the past 24 hours across 84,239 traders, with long liquidations accounting for $254 million, roughly 85% of the total.

    Bitcoin longs took $122 million in damage. Ether longs lost $95.7 million. The largest single liquidation was a $10 million BTC-USDT swap on OKX. The lopsided ratio confirms the market was leaning heavily bullish after eight consecutive days of gains heading into the weekend, leaving it vulnerable to exactly this kind of headline shock.

    Major tokens fell in lockstep, meanwhile. Ether dropped 1.8% to $2,114, XRP lost 2.5% to $1.41, BNB slid 1.4% to $633, solana fell 2.1% to $88.55, and dogecoin lost 2.7% to $0.092. The only majors green on the week were ether at 0.8% and solana at 0.7%. Everything else is red over seven days.

    The 48-hour window means the deadline arrives Monday evening. If Iran doesn’t comply, and there’s no indication it will, the market faces the prospect of strikes on power infrastructure, which would be the first direct targeting of civilian energy systems in the conflict.

    The Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed to most commercial traffic, with roughly 20% of the world’s oil and gas flows still disrupted.

    Last week’s rally to $75,912 now looks like it was built on ceasefire speculation that evaporated over the weekend. The Fed held rates on Wednesday with a dovish lean that should have supported risk assets, but the persistent risk of war headlines has traders holding back from making outsized directional bets.

  • Amanda Peet Reveals Breast Cancer Diagnosis

    Amanda Peet Reveals Breast Cancer Diagnosis

    Your Friends & Neighbors star Amanda Peet has revealed she’s been diagnosed with breast cancer.

    The actress detailed her experience leading up to and following her diagnosis in an essay for The New Yorker, which came as both of her parents were in hospice.

    Peet began the essay by recounting the myriad of close memories she has with her mother, whom she “told everything.” She wrote, “So it was strange not to tell her, last fall, that I’d been diagnosed with cancer.”

    “For many years, I’ve been told that I have ‘dense’ and ‘busy’ breasts — not as a compliment but as a warning that they require extra monitoring,” she continued. “I had been seeing a breast surgeon every six months for checkups. The Friday before Labor Day, I went for what I thought would be a routine scan. Dr. K. usually chatted me up while she examined me, but this time she went silent. She told me that she didn’t like the way something looked on the ultrasound and wanted to perform a biopsy. After the procedure, she said that she would walk the sample over to Cedars-Sinai and hand-deliver it to Pathology. That’s when I knew.”

    The following day, her doctor shared a preliminary report: “The tumor ‘appeared’ to be small, but I would need an MRI after the holiday weekend to determine ‘the extent of disease.’ On Tuesday, we would also learn my receptor status, which indicates how tough your strain of cancer is. ‘It’s like dogs,’ she explained. ‘You have poodles on one end and, on the other, pit bulls.’”

    After learning of the diagnosis, Peet’s close family and friends rallied around her, but refrained from telling her mother due to her Parkinson’s disease, she said. “My mom lived in a cottage twenty feet from our kitchen, but it didn’t cross my mind to go tell her because she was in the final stage of Parkinson’s disease,” Peet wrote. “She still recognized me, and sometimes answered ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to my questions, but always reverted to an empty stare.”

    Shortly after, Peet’s sister shared news that their father was in ill health. “My sister called: our father was about to die. Our parents, long divorced, were both in hospice, on opposite coasts. Our mother’s had started in June, but our father’s was only a week in, so we hadn’t expected him to go first,” she wrote.

    Peet explained that she did “not make it before my father took his last breath, but I got to see his body before it was taken from his apartment.” She recounted the feelings of seeing her father after his death, adding, “I felt guilty for not crying, but at least I got a reprieve from guessing how much longer I had to live.”

    The Fatal Attraction actress noted that while “my mind should’ve been flooded with memories” of her father after his death, her mind was consumed with thoughts about her own health.

    “As soon as my dad’s corpse was out of sight, I was free to panic about my cancer again,” she wrote.

    Amid juggling her health, Peet and her sister grappled with telling her mother the news of their father’s death. “My sister and I toyed with the idea of telling her that our dad had died, but it was impossible to gauge how much she could comprehend,” she wrote, adding that as her mother’s health had declined over the past few years, “our talks had become shorter and shorter until I was only giving her positive, bite-size updates about my life.”

    Peet’s doctor soon after gave her an update, texting, “All poodle features!” This meant her breast cancer was treatable.

    “I was happier than I’d been pre-diagnosis, when I was just a regular person who didn’t have cancer. But after about ten minutes I remembered that I still needed the MRI and regressed to baseline terror,” she wrote. “Dr. K. said that the radiologist would check my lymph nodes, as well as ‘the left side for any surprise findings’ and call with the results within a week. It was dawning on me that cancer diagnoses come in a slow drip.”

    Peet noted that a radiologist went on to find a second mass in the same breast. Then, she had to endure an MRI-guided biopsy, which she described as “when a tumor sample is extracted while you’re inside the big white imaging doughnut.” She recounted the experience in the essay, adding that, “As I left, the doctor told me it was fifty-fifty whether or not there was more cancer.”

    “Two days later, we found out that the second mass was benign, and that I would only need a lumpectomy and radiation, not a double mastectomy or chemo,” Peet wrote, which led the actress and her husband to tell their children about their mother’s diagnosis.

    In January, two weeks after Peet had “my first clear scan,” the hospice nurse suggested she call the mortuary, and “told me that my mom was going to die in a matter of days and that most people find it too painful to make arrangements in the immediate aftermath.”

    The actress movingly recounted spending time with her mother before she passed:  “I wasn’t sure whether my mom knew that she was looking at me or whether I was just a constellation of interesting, disembodied shapes. I said ‘howdy doodle’ — that’s how she often greeted me. But then I realized that she was communing without words, and I followed suit. Time was running out, and, besides, I had already told her everything.”

  • Soccer Star Jorginho Frello Says Chappell Roan’s Team Was “Extremely Aggressive” Toward His Daughter, Slams Singer’s Treatment of Fans

    Soccer Star Jorginho Frello Says Chappell Roan’s Team Was “Extremely Aggressive” Toward His Daughter, Slams Singer’s Treatment of Fans

    Brazilian soccer player Jorginho Frello is slamming Chappell Roan and her team for the pop star’s alleged mistreatment of his daughter at a São Paulo hotel on Saturday.

    Frello shared a lengthy post to his Instagram Stories on Saturday about the situation, where he said that he “went through a very upsetting situation with my family earlier.”

    He wrote that his wife and 11-year-old daughter were attending Lollapalooza Brazil, which Roan is headlining this weekend, and his child “made a sign because she was so happy to see an artist she really admires, or used to admire.” (The soccer star tagged Roan in the post, and also shared a photo of his daughter’s sign, which reads, “H-O-T-T-O-G-O I am watching Chappell Roan” in blue, pink and purple writing.)

    Frello did not detail the name of the child, though his wife, Catherine Harding, shares an 11-year-old daughter with Jude Law. The Hollywood Reporter has reached out to Law’s reps for comment.

    “By coincidence, they’re staying at the same hotel as this artist. During breakfast, the artist walked past their table. My daughter, like any child, recognised [sic] her, got excited, and just wanted to make sure it really was her,” he wrote. “And the worst part is she didn’t even approach her. She simply walked past the singer’s table, looked to confirm it was her, smiled, and went back to sit with her mum. She didn’t say anything, didn’t ask for anything.”

    The soccer star wrote that “what happened next was completely disproportionate,” explaining that “a large security guard came over to their table while they were still having breakfast and began speaking in an extremely aggressive manner to both my wife and daughter, saying that she shouldn’t allow my daughter to ‘disrespect’ or ‘harass’ other people.”

    THR reached out to Roan’s reps for comment, but received no reply by the time of publication.

    “Honestly, I don’t know at what point simply walking past a table and looking to see if someone is there can be considered harassment,” Frello continued. “He even said he would file a complaint against them with the hotel, while my 11-year-old daughter was sitting there in tears. My daughter was extremely shaken and cried a lot.”

    Frello, a celebrated player for Brazil’s Flamengo, has almost 5 million followers on Instagram, and he detailed his experience living in the public eye in his post. “I’ve lived with football, public exposure, and well-known people for many years, and I understand very well what respect and boundaries are. What happened there was not that. It was just a child admiring someone,” he wrote.

    Frello continued: “It’s sad to see this kind of treatment coming from those who should understand the importance of fans. At the end of the day, they are the ones who build all of this. I sincerely hope this serves as a moment of reflection. No one should have to go through this, especially not a child.”

    He tagged Roan’s Instagram account again at the end of his post, concluding, “WITHOUT YOUR FANS, YOU WOULD BE NOTHING. AND TO THE FANS, SHE DOES NOT DESERVE YOUR AFFECTION.”

    The Grammy Award winner is known to speak her mind, specifically about fan behavior. After launching to fame swiftly in 2024, she asked people to “stop touching me,” “stop being weird to my family and friends” and “stop assuming things about me” in an August Instagram post of the same year.

    “For the past 10 years I’ve been going non-stop to build my project and it’s come to the point that I need to draw lines and set boundaries. I want to be an artist for a very very long time,” Roan wrote. “I’ve been in too many nonconsensual physical and social interactions and I just need to lay it out and remind you, women don’t owe you shit. I chose this career path because because I love music and art and honoring my inner child, I do not accept harassment of any kind because I chose this path, nor do I deserve it.”

    A few weeks ago, a video of Roan confronting paparazzi in Paris quickly went viral. As a pool of paparazzi and autograph seekers began taking photos of her, the enraged”Pink Pony Club” singer took out her phone and began filming them while yelling at them to stand back.

    “I’m being disregarded as a human. This is what it’s like. I’m just trying to go to dinner and I’ve asked these people several times to get away from me!” Roan said.

    March 21, 8:50 p.m. Updated to reflect that the 11-year-old is Jude Law’s biological daughter.

  • Barry Keoghan Says the Online ‘Abuse of How I Look’ Is So Bad He No Longer Wants to ‘Go Outside’: ‘It’s Becoming a Problem’

    Barry Keoghan Says the Online ‘Abuse of How I Look’ Is So Bad He No Longer Wants to ‘Go Outside’: ‘It’s Becoming a Problem’

    Barry Keoghan recently told SiriusXM’s “The Morning Mash Up” (via EW) that the online “abuse” about his appearance has gotten so bad that he no longer wants to “go outside.”

    “There’s a lot of hate online,” Keoghan explained. “There’s a lot of abuse of how I look, and it’s kind of past the point of — you know, everyone goes through that… but it’s made me shy away. It’s made me really go inside myself, not want to attend places, not want to go outside.”

    He added, “I say this being absolute pure and honest to you. It’s becoming a problem.”

    Keoghan explained that he’s removed himself from social media, but occasionally, after a premiere or event, he will go online to see “how it’s received.” Unfortunately, he said most of the time, the reaction is “not nice.”

    When responding to a question about finding peace in his private life, the “Saltburn” star said, “I don’t have to hide away ’cause I am hiding away… I actually don’t go to places because of these things.”

    Keoghan added that he fears the anxieties about his appearance could affect his career. “When that starts leaking into your art, it becomes a problem, because then you don’t want to even be on screen anymore.”

    He also worries about what his young son, Brando, will think when he’s old enough to read the online hate for himself.

    Keoghan added, “It is disappointing for the fans, but it’s also disappointing that my little boy has to read all of this stuff when he gets older.”

  • First ‘SNL U.K.’ Weekend Update Takes Aim at Former Prince Andrew: His New Residence, Marsh Farm, Is ‘Named After the Nearby Marsh Where His Body Will Be Found’

    First ‘SNL U.K.’ Weekend Update Takes Aim at Former Prince Andrew: His New Residence, Marsh Farm, Is ‘Named After the Nearby Marsh Where His Body Will Be Found’

    For the first-ever edition of “SNL U.K.’s” Weekend Update, one person was given the royal treatment: former Prince Andrew.

    Hosts Ania Magliano and Paddy Young did not hold back as they roasted the disgraced royal, who was arrested by the U.K. police in February on suspicion of misconduct in public office after the release of the Epstein files. Prior to that, he was also stripped of his royal title and ordered to leave his Windsor home.

    “Coming up on Weekend Update: pedophilia. But first, war!” Magliano said as the segment kicked off, eliciting laughter from the live audience.

    After several Iran War-related punchlines and Al Nash guesting as a power-hungry Captain Birdseye, the focus was back on the former prince. “Renovations to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s new home, Marsh Farm, have been taking place over the last month, including the installation of Sky TV. So, if you’re watching this Andrew, hello! You’re not gonna like this next bit. Also, I’m older than I look,” Magliano joked, adding: “Andrew’s new residence, Marsh Farm, is of course named after the nearby marsh where his body will be found.”

    Next, it was Young’s turn. “It was reported this week that the police investigation into Andrew is set to widen,” he said. “The big question now is, if Andrew is charged, found guilty and put in prison, will he be able to keep his mouth shut? I hope not, said his cellmate’s penis.”

    Another winning joke took on the U.K.’s other royal family: the Beckhams. “Feuding father and son David and Brooklyn Beckham narrowly missed each other whilst at the same Beverly Hills hotel,” Young began. “The feud began when Victoria was, quote, ‘inappropriately’ close with her son at his wedding, and escalated after Brooklyn accidentally yelled out his wife’s name during sex with his mum.”

  • ETH/BTC Holds 0.03 but the Real Test Is Whether It Can Reclaim 0.032 Level

    ETH/BTC Holds 0.03 but the Real Test Is Whether It Can Reclaim 0.032 Level

    The $ETH/$BTC pair is sitting at 0.03050 as of March 21, 2026, and analyst Daan Crypto Trades says that level needs to hold. On the two-day chart, $ETH/$BTC has been in a prolonged downtrend since peaking above 0.04100 in mid-2025. It was lower through the second half of the last year and into early 2026 before finding what looks like a short-term floor in the 0.03000 to 0.03005 range. The current price is barely above that floor, and the market context around it is firmly risk-off.

    What the Chart Shows

    The two-day $ETH/$BTC chart on Binance tells a clear story about the past year. From a low near 0.01856 in early 2025, the pair ran hard into July, hitting above 0.04100 before the trend reversed completely.

    The decline from that peak has been consistent and steep, with brief recoveries at 0.03259 and 0.03400 that both failed to hold. Each rally got sold, and each rejection pushed the pair lower until it found the current consolidation zone just above 0.03000.

    The highlighted box on the chart marks the current tight range where the pair has been compressing, roughly between 0.03005 and 0.03100. That compression after a sustained downtrend can mean accumulation or it can mean a brief pause before another leg lower. The level at 0.03000 is the line that separates those two interpretations in practical terms.

    The 0.032 Level and Why It Matters for Alts

    Daan identifies 0.03259 as the key resistance level to watch. That zone previously acted as support during the downtrend before breaking down, which means reclaiming it would represent a meaningful shift in the structure of the pair rather than just a bounce within the existing range.

    The alt market angle is the part that makes this relevant beyond just the $ETH/$BTC trade. When $ETH strengthens relative to $BTC, it typically signals that risk appetite is expanding across the broader crypto market.

    Capital flows from $BTC into $ETH first, then into smaller altcoins. A sustained move above 0.032 on the pair’s chart would be a leading signal that alts are finding the conditions they need to rally. Without it, most altcoins remain stuck in the same risk-off environment that has characterized the market since the $BTC rejections from the $72,000 area.

    What Needs to Happen in USD Terms First

    The $ETH/$BTC analysis doesn’t exist in isolation. Daan’s view is that $BTC above $72,000 and $ETH above $2,200 in USD terms are prerequisites for the ratio to reclaim 0.032.

    The logic is straightforward: the pair needs low-timeframe momentum in dollar terms before the relative strength trade can develop. A rising $ETH/$BTC driven by $ETH strength in USD is a different and more durable signal than one driven by $BTC weakness.

    $BTC has rejected from the $72,000 area multiple times recently, which is the source of the current risk-off sentiment. Each rejection has reinforced the ceiling and kept the broader market cautious. Until $BTC breaks convincingly above that level and holds, the conditions for a sustained $ETH/$BTC recovery aren’t fully in place. The chart shows what’s possible structurally. The USD price action in $BTC is what unlocks it.

    The Risk-Off Reality Right Now

    The current setup is neutral to cautious. $ETH/$BTC holding 0.03 is a prerequisite, not a signal. The floor is important to maintain but maintaining it doesn’t itself trigger anything. What the analysis describes is a market waiting for a catalyst that hasn’t arrived yet, with a clear set of conditions that would change the picture: $BTC above $72K, $ETH above $2.2K, and $ETH/$BTC reclaiming 0.032 on a sustained basis.

    Until that sequence plays out, the $ETH/$BTC pair stays in compression and the broader alt market stays under pressure.

    Conclusion

    $ETH/$BTC holding 0.03 is the floor that keeps the setup alive. Losing it likely accelerates alt market pain. Reclaiming 0.032 is the signal traders are waiting for, but that requires $BTC and $ETH to move first in USD terms. Right now the market is risk-off, the $72K $BTC rejection is fresh, and patience is the only rational position until the structure changes.

  • Reddit is weighing identity verification methods to combat its bot problem

    There could be one more step required before creating an account and posting on Reddit in the future. According to Reddit’s CEO, Steve Huffman, the social media platform is exploring different ways to verify a user is human and not a bot. When asked by the TBPN podcast how to confirm that it’s a human using Reddit, Huffman responded with several verification methods with varying degrees of heavy-handedness.

    “The most lightweight way is with something like Face ID or Touch ID,” Huffman said during the interview. “They actually require a human presence, like a human has to touch, or do or look at something, so that actually just proves there’s a person there or gets you pretty far.”

    Besides these passkey methods that use biometrics data, Huffman said there are other options like relying on third-party services that are decentralized or don’t require ID. On the other end of the spectrum, Huffman also mentioned more burdensome options, like ID-checking services.

    Recent years have brought a rise in bots flooding social media platforms including Reddit, where they’ve even been used to conduct secret experiments. It doesn’t sound like Reddit has landed on how to verify its users’ human identity yet, but Huffman did emphasize that the platform still wants to prioritize anonymity for its users. However, verifying humanity through identifiable and personal data could end up as a dealbreaker for Reddit users who value the anonymity of the platform.

    “Part of our promise for our users is we don’t know your name but we do want to know you’re a person,” Huffman said. “It’ll be an evolution for us for a while, and probably every platform to find the right middle ground here.”

    Reddit co-founder and former executive chair, Alexis Ohanian, said on X that Reddit requiring Face ID wasn’t something he expected but agreed that something had to be done about the fake content from bots, adding that, “I just don’t know how to sell face-scanning to Redditors or even lurkers.” We reached out to Reddit’s communications team and will update the story when we hear back.