Author: rb809rb

  • Wayans Brothers Reveal the Only Way ‘White Chicks’ Sequel “Can Happen”

    Marlon Wayans and Shawn Wayans are open to a White Chicks sequel, but under one condition.

    The brothers, who also returned for the new Scary Movie installment, recently opened up about potentially revisiting the cult classic during an interview with Entertainment Tonight.

    “I’ll put it this way: we’re game,” Marlon said. “We want to know if people want to come out and laugh, and [if] they come see Scary Movie, then I definitely…”

    Shawn continued, “If this movie does well, a White Chicks 2 can happen.”

    The 2004 comedy follows two disgraced FBI agents who go undercover, transforming themselves from African-American men into blonde, white women, in an effort to protect a pair of socialites from a kidnapping plot. Marlon and Shawn starred and co-wrote the film with their other brother, Keenen Ivory Wayans, who served as the director.

    While the Him actor seems down for a potential White Chicks follow-up more than two decades later, Marlon previously detailed the challenges of making the original movie and getting into character every day on set.

    He said, via People, on Kai Cenat’s Mafiathon 3 livestream last year that they spent “seven hours in makeup every day, and then we work 14 hours after the seven hours because we produced a movie. If you’re gonna produce the movie, you gotta push your call time, so that means you have no turnaround. Turnaround is usually 12 hours.”

    “We only got 3 hours every night, so after work, we were still there,” Marlon continued of the grueling process. “Taking the makeup off, that took an hour.”

    You’ll just have to wait and see if the brothers team up for a White Chicks sequel, but until then, Marlon and Shawn can be seen together in Scary Movie 6, which hits theaters on June 5, after being absent from the three previous installments.

  • Oscar Isaac Once Said He Wanted the Freedom to Take on Any Role. ‘Beef’ Shows He’s Earned It

    Oscar Isaac Once Said He Wanted the Freedom to Take on Any Role. ‘Beef’ Shows He’s Earned It

    I don’t think we appreciate Oscar Isaac enough.

    That thought lingers while watching Season 2 of Netflix’s “Beef,” which arrives to positive reviews and, once again, widespread praise for its performances. It’s safe to say that creator Lee Sung Jin has built a knack for giving actors rich and layered material. But even within an ensemble primed for Emmy attention, Isaac stands apart.

    And yet, somehow, this evokes a feeling from the industry and on social media that this is “business as usual” – another great Oscar Isaac performance, another moment that will be admired. Still, it doesn’t seem like a collective “unanimous” sentiment that the industry must reward.

    Hollywood has no shortage of actors we collectively agree are underappreciated. Bring up names like Ben Foster, Margo Martindale, Paul Giamatti, Keith David, Nia Long or James McAvoy (and hundreds more), and you’ll find near-universal consensus: How are they not bigger? How are they not more awarded?

    Isaac is among those names, too.

    It would be easy to reduce this to a familiar truth: Latino actors remain undervalued in Hollywood. That’s part of the story, but it’s not the whole story.

    I keep thinking back to a Variety Awards Circuit Podcast conversation I had with Isaac in October 2021, when he was promoting Paul Schrader’s “The Card Counter.” It was still the height of COVID-19, and like many conversations at the time, it drifted between the personal and the philosophical — life, art and representation.

    At the time, Lin-Manuel Miranda’s “In the Heights” was rolling out in theaters and on streaming, in the hybrid format that studios adopted during the height of the pandemic. Naturally, it prompted a broader discussion about visibility and Isaac offered a perspective that didn’t make the cut. Still, I went and revisited, and it has stayed with me ever since:

    “It’s a challenging time because representation is important,” he said at the time. “But for me, what I found really moving wasn’t necessarily my personal story being represented. What moved me was seeing someone Latino being allowed to do everything. That meant everything to me. Like when I found out Raúl Juliá originated ‘Betrayal’ on Broadway as an Englishman — Harold Pinter’s play. The first time it premiered in the United States, a Puerto Rican actor played that role. That meant so much to me — much more than seeing a play about Cuban refugees, which is important, too.”

    That idea — the freedom to do everything — is the key to understanding the true representation that the underrepresented seek, and to Isaac’s career.

    Yes, Latino stories matter. Latino characters matter. They are not mutually exclusive. Isaac’s artistry has never been confined to identity. His career has been defined by range and a refusal to be boxed in.

    For many, the first real jolt came with Nicolas Winding Refn’s “Drive” (2011), where Isaac played Standard, a recently released ex-con who could have easily been reduced to a one-note archetype. Instead, Isaac infused him with vulnerability and desperation, turning a small supporting role into something memorable.

    Then came Joel and Ethan Coen’s underrated masterpiece “Inside Llewyn Davis” (2013), where Isaac delivered what remains one of the greatest unrecognized performances of the 21st century — a portrait of artistic failure that felt so raw and lived-in. By any reasonable metric, it should have earned him an Oscar nomination, if not the win.

    He followed with J.C. Chandor’s crime drama “A Most Violent Year” (2014) and Alex Garland’s sci-fi flick, “Ex Machina” (2015), the latter reinventing the “mad scientist” archetype into something seductive, terrifying, and killer dance moves.

    Still, the Oscars looked away.

    Television tried to correct the course. In HBO’s 2015 miniseries “Show Me a Hero,” Isaac portrayed Yonkers Mayor Nick Wasicsko, who fought to desegregate public housing. He steered the man with an aching humanity, earning a Golden Globe trophy. The Emmys, however, would shut out the series entirely.

    And yet, Isaac has continued to adapt. He moved fluidly between prestige and blockbuster fare — from Poe Dameron in the contemporary  “Star Wars” trilogy, beginning with “The Force Awakens” (2015), to the villainous turn in “X-Men: Apocalypse” (2016), to Marvel’s “Moon Knight” (2022) on Disney+. His only Primetime Emmy nomination would come in 2022, alongside his longtime friend Jessica Chastain in the miniseries adaptation of “Scenes From a Marriage.”

    The resumé is there. The respect is there. But the awards, consistently, are not.

    Which brings us back to “Beef.”

    Netflix

    The first season of Lee’s anthology series swept the 2023 ceremony, winning eight Emmys, including outstanding limited or anthology series, along with acting prizes for Steven Yeun and Ali Wong (the first Asians to win their respective categories). Season 2 enters the year with similar ambitions.

    The story centers on a young couple (Charles Melton and Cailee Spaeny) whose lives become entangled with their volatile boss and his wife (Isaac and Carey Mulligan) after witnessing a disturbing incident at an elite country club. What unfolds is a tightly wound spiral of power, resentment and control.

    Isaac plays Josh Martín, a man driven by insecurity and status anxiety, constantly performing a version of himself for those he believes hold power. It’s a slippery, psychologically complex role and one that requires both restraint and explosion. Isaac does deliver both.

    Across the sophomore season — and especially in the final two episodes, “The Hour of Separation” and “It Will Stay This Way and You Will Obey” — Isaac peels back Josh’s layers with surgical precision. And while the performance is undoubtedly funny at times and unsettling in others, it ultimately becomes deeply tragic and, honestly, redemptive.

    Even in moments of dark absurdity (his sexual “activities” at the laptop), Isaac never loses the character’s core. That’s what separates him in the show. And that’s what has always separated him from his peers in the business.

    Best of all, he’s a Latino actor playing a character where we can see that he is Latino, but it’s not the crux of why Josh exists in this story. He just simply — is — in the story.

    And still, there’s a lingering question: Will it matter?

    Because if history is any indication, Isaac’s work in “Beef” may be admired, even celebrated — but not fully recognized. Only one Latino actor has won the lead actor (limited) award – Jharrel Jerome for the 2019 Ava DuVernay crime drama “When They See Us.” Since then, the only Latino performers recognized in the category have been Lin-Manuel Miranda (“Hamilton”) and, coincidentally, Isaac with his 2022 nomination.

    His final moment in the series, staring directly into the camera, is among the most compelling reasons why he’s so great. It’s as if he’s asking the audience — and the industry — to finally see him.

    The truth is, Oscar Isaac has been doing this level of work for more than a decade. Since his 2022 Emmy-nominated year, Isaac has been quietly creating, and no one has noticed we hadn’t seen him on our screens for three years (he had two voice roles in between). We wouldn’t see him until he took on the titular role in Guillermo Del Toro’s monster epic “Frankenstein.” We shouldn’t have Isaac’s three-year hiatuses. This is a guy who does the work and is ready to do it, but somehow the industry hasn’t caught up.

    I hope with “Beef,” that will force them to look, and realize: There’s more meat on that bone.

    The Emmy Awards timeline begins with nomination-round voting from June 11–22, followed by the announcement of nominees on July 8.

  • Molly Shannon Says Will Ferrell Predicted That Actors ‘Are Eventually Going to Be Replaced by Robots’ During Early ‘SNL’ Days: We ‘Die Laughing About it Now’

    Molly Shannon Says Will Ferrell Predicted That Actors ‘Are Eventually Going to Be Replaced by Robots’ During Early ‘SNL’ Days: We ‘Die Laughing About it Now’

    Molly Shannon is reflecting on her decades-long friendship with Will Ferrell — and a surprisingly prescient comment he made early in their careers.

    During an appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live!, Shannon recalled meeting Ferrell in the mid-1990s while she was working at what she described as a “cappuccino, scone place” in Los Angeles. Introduced through the Groundlings comedy troupe, the two immediately connected. “We clicked right away,” she said, remembering serving him a scone and a latte. “We’ve been friends ever since. 30 years.”

    Both were hired in 1995 on “Saturday Night Live,” where they became part of a defining era for the long-running sketch series. Shannon created characters including Sally O’Malley, while the pair also collaborated on projects like “A Night at the Roxbury” and “Superstar.”

    But Shannon said one early conversation on “SNL” stood out. While she was enthusiastic about landing the job, Ferrell was more cautious about its longevity.

    “I don’t know. Who knows how long this is going to last?” he told her at the time. “I just think it’s not going to last long, and I think actors are eventually going to be replaced by robots, and they’re not going to need human actors anymore.”

    Shannon said she initially dismissed the idea as overly pessimistic, recalling that she told him, “You’re being so dark.”

    Ferrell, she added, joked he would be fine either way. “He said, ‘I could have a job working as a dog groomer or as a UPS driver or as a coach and still be happy.’”

    Looking back, Shannon said, “But Will was right,” adding that the two “die laughing about it now.”

  • Tether CEO Issues Bullish Bitcoin Post as Price Stabilizes at $75,000

    Tether CEO Issues Bullish Bitcoin Post as Price Stabilizes at $75,000

    Paolo Ardoino, the CEO of Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin firm, has reaffirmed his bullish stance on Bitcoin, sparking reactions as all eyes appear to be on Bitcoin following the recent market rally.

    In his post, Ardoino declared that Bitcoin is resistant after a viral artwork shared by Satoshigallery sparked the attention of the crypto community.

    The image features a striking human-form statue forged from steel, and the sculpture was shared with a caption that says, “You can bend the steel but not its meaning.”

    Although the statement was not extremely clear, Ardoino has related it to Bitcoin’s nature, interpreting the image as a representation of Bitcoin’s resistant nature.

    Ardoino stirs debate

    Ardoino’s interpretation of the image has received mixed reactions across the crypto community as some commentators agreed that the image is significant in representing Bitcoin’s true nature as being resistant.

    However, others have criticized the leading cryptocurrency as some named it as a scam even as Bitcoin continues to show signs of a major recovery.

    Nonetheless, the criticism was outweighed by more supportive remarks from other commentators as one user described the piece as one of the most concept-connecting sculptures they had ever seen.

    Also, another commentator further stressed that everything else eventually bends, suggesting that Bitcoin endures even in the face of pressure.

    Bitcoin stabilizes at $75,000

    Ardoino’s bullish comment about Bitcoin has come following a recent price rally that has seen the asset surpass the long-lost $75,000 level.

    While this has reignited market optimism, investor confidence is growing stronger, and experts are reaffirming their bullish stance on the asset.

    While the rally has cooled and cryptocurrencies are currently showing mixed price action, Bitcoin remains stable around the $75,000 mark.

  • Justin Sun Makes an Unusual Offer to the Hacker Involved in the $290 Million Hack

    Justin Sun Makes an Unusual Offer to the Hacker Involved in the $290 Million Hack

    While the turmoil caused by the KelpDAO-related security vulnerability crisis in the DeFi ecosystem continues, a notable statement came from Justin Sun, a leading figure in the cryptocurrency world.

    Sun, in a statement on social media, directly challenged the perpetrator, offering to negotiate. “KelpDAO hacker, how much do you want? Let’s talk. Of course, with the help of KelpDAO,” Sun said, arguing that the situation needed to be resolved before it escalated further.

    In his statement, Sun pointed out that the attack could have serious consequences for both Aave and KelpDAO, saying, “It’s not worth risking both Aave and KelpDAO because of this hack.” He also alluded to the alleged theft of approximately $300 million in assets, adding, “You can’t spend $300 million anyway,” sending an indirect message to the attacker.

    Related News A Bullish Signal Seen in XRP for the First Time in Three Months

    Sun’s move has brought back into focus the “white-hat consensus” method seen in previous major DeFi attacks. As you may recall, the exploit on KelpDAO’s rsETH bridge resulted in billions of dollars worth of ETH being withdrawn from Aave, creating significant liquidity pressure on the protocol.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Satellite images reveal Israel expanding Gaza military sites

    Satellite images reveal Israel expanding Gaza military sites

    Images show Israel building permanent military bases in Gaza as US-backed reconstruction plans stall.

    The United States has proposed plans to rebuild Rafah, a city in southern Gaza that was flattened by two years of Israeli bombardment. It has been touted as the centrepiece of a US-Israeli vision for a post-war Gaza, but satellite images suggest the project has stalled before even breaking ground.

    An Al Jazeera Digital Investigations Unit examination of Planet Labs and Sentinel Hub satellite imagery revealed that Israeli military fortifications are expanding at a relentless pace across Gaza, particularly in Rafah.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 4 itemsend of list

    Analysis of imagery from February 25 to March 15 confirmed that while rubble removal has essentially ceased in Beit Hanoon in the north and Rafah, Israeli forces are systematically entrenching a permanent military reality across the devastated enclave.

    While civilian reconstruction has slowed, Israeli military construction has accelerated. Satellite imagery from March 10 shows extensive clearing and fortification at the strategic al-Muntar hilltop in Shujayea, a neighbourhood in Gaza City, and outposts in Khan Younis in Gaza’s south.

    In central Gaza, Sentinel imagery from March 15 revealed ongoing work on a trench and dirt berm reaching as far as the Maghazi camp near Deir el-Balah. In Juhor ad-Dik, new roads now link established military sites to newly levelled areas, suggesting the creation of permanent outposts.

    These findings align with a late 2025 investigation by Forensic Architecture that identified 48 Israeli military sites within Gaza – 13 of which were built after an October “ceasefire”. These sites have evolved into permanent bases with paved roads, watchtowers and constant communication links to Israel’s domestic military network.

    Satellite images captured between February 20 and March 10, 2026, reveal significant engineering and expansion works at an Israeli military outpost east of Gaza City. [Al Jazeera/Planet]
    Satellite images captured from February 20 to March 10, 2026, reveal significant engineering and expansion work at an Israeli military outpost in eastern Gaza City [Planet Labs]

    The ‘New Rafah’ illusion

    At the World Economic Forum in the Swiss city of Davos in January, Jared Kushner, US President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, showcased AI-generated visions of a “New Rafah” featuring skyscrapers and luxury resorts. Trump further promoted this “Middle East Riviera” through a 20-point plan, promising $10bn in funding via the Board of Peace, which he has established as a potential rival of the United Nations.

    However, the Geneva-based Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor has warned that the “New Rafah” plan is a mechanism for demographic re-engineering and forced displacement.

    The plan involves dividing Gaza into population blocks and closed military zones. Palestinians would be confined to “cities” of residential caravans, each packing roughly 25,000 people into a single square kilometre (0.4sq miles). These “cities” are to be surrounded by fences and checkpoints, and access to essential services would be contingent upon passing Israeli-US security screenings – a model Euro-Med likened to ghettos.

    An Israeli military site in Khan Younis, southern Gaza, shows continuous development, paving, and fortification in March 2026. [Planet laba]
    Satellite images of an Israeli military site in Khan Younis show continuous development, paving and construction of fortifications in March 2026 [File: Planet Labs]

    A new, permanent border

    Gaza’s “yellow line” “ceasefire” boundary is being transformed into a permanent frontier. In Beit Lahiya in the north, satellite images from March 4 show the construction of a dirt berm along the “yellow line” and another running parallel to it and constructed more than 580 metres (634 yards) into what the “ceasefire” designates as land where Palestinians are supposed to live – a significant encroachment beyond the designated line.

    In December, Israeli Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir defined the line as a “new border”. Defence Minister Israel Katz later declared Israel would “never leave Gaza”, promising to establish military-agricultural settlements.

    Al Jazeera’s investigation further documented that Israel has secretly moved concrete boundary markers hundreds of metres deeper into areas designated for Palestinians.

    Traces of Israeli military vehicles are seen operating beyond the designated dirt berm in northern Gaza on March 10, 2026, in clear violation of ceasefire demarcations. [Al Jazeera/Sentinel Hub]
    Traces of Israeli military vehicles operating beyond a dirt berm on the ‘yellow line’ in northern Gaza are seen on March 10, 2026, in clear violation of ‘ceasefire’ demarcations [File: Sentinel Hub]

    A bloody ‘ceasefire’

    Despite the October “ceasefire”, violence persists. Gaza’s Ministry of Health reported 750 deaths and more than 2,090 injuries since the “ceasefire” began, bringing the total death toll since the October 2023 start of Israel’s genocidal war to more than 72,300. An independent study in The Lancet medical journal suggested the actual death toll could be significantly higher. It estimated more than 75,000 deaths from “direct violence” by early 2025 alone.

    An Al Jazeera analysis found that Israel has launched attacks on 160 out of the 182 days of the “ceasefire”. These attacks often involve incursions aimed at levelling areas designated for Palestinian habitation.

    Efforts to document these developments are facing unprecedented hurdles. This month, Planet Labs announced an “indefinite” ban on images from conflict zones after a US government request. Other providers, like Vantor, have imposed similar restrictions, severely limiting the ability of media and human rights groups to monitor the situation in Gaza.

    As of this month, humanitarian assessments by aid groups, including Oxfam and Save the Children, have given the Trump reconstruction plan a failing grade, saying it has failed to “demonstrate a clear impact on conditions inside Gaza”.

    INTERACTIVE - Gaza map Israel’s withdrawal in Trump’s 20-point plan yellow line map-1760017243
    (Al Jazeera)
  • Tesla is rolling out its Robotaxi service to Dallas and Houston

    Tesla is expanding its Robotaxi footprint across Texas by introducing availability in both Dallas and Houston. As announced in a post on X, the EV maker is rolling out its Robotaxis to small sections of the Texas cities, as detailed by two maps of its new service areas.

    The first Robotaxi rides started in Austin, Texas where Tesla is headquartered, but the service’s launch was paired with a “Tesla Safety Monitor,” or a supervising human in the passenger seat. Earlier this year, Tesla began to transition away from including safety monitors, leaving its Robotaxis to operate unsupervised and fully autonomous. In the latest announcement on X, Tesla also showed off a 360-degree panning shot with no safety monitor, but the company hasn’t stated if its Dallas and Houston service will have in-car human supervision. It’s worth nothing that Tesla previously admitted that some of its Robotaxis are sometimes driven remotely by human operators.

    With the Robotaxi expansion into Dallas and Houston, Tesla is encroaching on Waymo’s autonomous ride-hailing service that entered the same markets in February of this year. Looking ahead, Tesla is also targeting the Bay Area market in California for its Robotaxi expansion. While the company has received approvals to operate a ride-hailing service in California, it still doesn’t have authorization for autonomous taxis in the state yet.

  • Elizabeth Warren Accuses SEC Chair Paul Atkins of Potentially Lying to Congress

    Elizabeth Warren Accuses SEC Chair Paul Atkins of Potentially Lying to Congress

    In brief

    • Elizabeth Warren accused Paul Atkins of potentially misleading Congress about the SEC’s falling enforcement activity.
    • New data showed the SEC brought far fewer cases under the Trump administration than historical averages.
    • Warren says the decline raises concerns about investor protection and political favoritism.

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), the highest-ranking Democrat on the powerful Senate Banking Committee, formally accused the head of the SEC this week of potentially lying to Congress—an illegal act punishable with imprisonment.

    In a letter sent Wednesday, Warren told SEC Chair Paul Atkins she believes the regulator may have intentionally misled the Banking Committee during a February 12 hearing, when Atkins was pressed about the SEC’s plummeting number of new enforcement actions under the second Trump administration.

    Atkins responded to Warren’s question at the time by saying he disagreed “with the premise” of her inquiry. When Warren followed up on the matter at a later point in the hearing, Atkins said he wasn’t sure what data the senator was referencing.

    Last week, however, the SEC released its enforcement data for 2025, which showed the regulator only brought 456 new enforcement actions last year—200 of which were filed by the outgoing Biden administration. The 256 cases brought by the Trump SEC pale in comparison to the 765 enforcement actions brought on average by the SEC every year over the last decade. 

    “The data showing a sharp decline in enforcement actions under your watch, significant reduction in staff and the sudden leadership changes all raise serious questions about the Commission’s willingness and capacity to protect investors and the markets,” Warren said.

    The SEC declined comment when reached by Decrypt.

    The crime of making a materially false statement to a congressional committee is punishable by a fine and up to five years in prison. Such a charge would need to be brought by the Department of Justice, however, and it is very unlikely the Trump DOJ would pursue such a case against a member of the Trump administration.

    Should Democrats retake Congress in November’s midterms, however, Warren could end up well-positioned to make Atkins’ life much more difficult in the medium-term. The crypto-skeptical lawmaker is likely to become the next chair of the Banking Committee should Democrats win back the Senate, an outcome currently standing at 55% odds on Polymarket.

    The SEC’s enforcement statistics are currently a hot-button issue for Democrats, given how they play into a larger narrative about the Trump administration’s appetite to pursue potential bad actors in financial markets—even those who may have ties to the president’s family and inner circle.

    The SEC under Trump has proudly touted its decrease in enforcement actions, tying the trend to a de-emphasis on crypto cases. Atkins has repeatedly argued the Biden-era SEC overzealously pursued cases against companies in the novel sector, a trend he has aggressively reversed.

    But the SEC’s enforcement rates have also dwindled across other sectors, including the traditional securities market. Further, the regulator has come under scrutiny for its treatment of entrepreneurs in the Trump family’s orbit. In Wednesday’s letter, Warren referenced a Reuters report detailing how the SEC’s head of enforcement resigned last month in part due to frustrations over the agency’s handling of fraud cases touching on President Trump’s inner circle.

    Atkins personally resisted pushes to pursue such cases, according to the report.

    Daily Debrief Newsletter

    Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

  • Pesticides in Healthy Foods Linked to Higher Lung Cancer Risk in People Under 50

    Close up image of roasted peppersShare on Pinterest
    A new study highlights an environmental risk factor that could be driving early onset lung cancer rates. Natalia Mishina/Stocksy
    • A small study found that young non-smokers who eat more fruit, vegetables, and whole grains are more likely to develop lung cancer than the general population.
    • The researchers speculate that this could be due to pesticides used on crops.
    • The study is small in sample size and does not prove causation, so experts caution against reducing fruits and vegetable intake.

    Younger nonsmokers who eat a higher quantity of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains are more likely to develop lung cancer than the general population.

    The research has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, but the authors speculate that their findings may be linked to pesticide use in crops.

    “Our research shows that younger non-smokers who eat a higher quantity of healthy foods than the general population are more likely to develop lung cancer,” said Jorge Nieva, MD, a medical oncologist and lung cancer specialist with USC Norris and lead investigator of the study, in a statement.

    “These counter-intuitive findings raise important questions about an unknown environmental risk factor for lung cancer related to otherwise beneficial food that needs to be addressed,” Nieva continued.

    The researchers note that non-organic fruits, vegetables, and whole grains produced commercially typically have higher levels of pesticides than many processed foods, as well as meat and dairy.

    Existing research that found agricultural workers who are exposed to pesticides have higher rates of lung cancer may support this theory.

    Rates of lung cancer in the United States have been falling since the 1980s, along with rates of smoking. However, this has not been true among non-smokers ages 50 and younger, particularly females. Women in this group are now more likely than men to develop lung cancer.

    “This trend is quite concerning. I think it is important for us to better understand through research why non-smokers are getting lung cancer,” Jimmy Johannes, MD, a pulmonologist and critical care medicine specialist at MemorialCare Long Beach Medical Center in Long Beach, California, who was not involved in the research, told Healthline.

    In undertaking their study, the researchers surveyed 187 patients who received a diagnosis of lung cancer by the time they were 50.

    The participants were asked to give details of their smoking history, diet, and demographics.

    The majority of those studied reported that they had never smoked and also were diagnosed with a type of lung cancer that is biologically different than the type of lung cancer that is caused by smoking.

    The researchers then used the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) to compare the diets of those surveyed with the general U.S. population. The Healthy Eating Index ranks Americans’ diets on a scale of 1-100.

    Young, non-smoking patients who had lung cancer had an HEI score of 65 out of 100, compared with the average U.S. score of 57.

    The researchers found that women scored higher than men.

    On average, those with lung cancer ate more fruit, vegetables, and whole grains than the average U.S. population.

    The study authors note that further research is needed to examine the link between pesticides and lung cancer among young people, especially in females.

    The study authors say the next step in the research would be to confirm the association between pesticides and lung cancer in young people by measuring pesticide levels in blood and urine samples from lung cancer patients.

    “This work represents a critical step toward identifying modifiable environmental factors that may contribute to lung cancer in young adults,” Nivea said in a statement. “Our hope is that these insights can guide both public health recommendations and future investigation into lung cancer prevention.”

    Experts who spoke with Healthline caution that people shouldn’t reduce their intake of fruits and vegetables based on the results of the study, which is small in sample size and doesn’t prove causation.

    “This study raises an important question, but doesn’t directly measure pesticide exposure in participants. Decades of evidence still show that diets rich in fruits and vegetables help lower cancer risk. People should not reduce their intake of plant foods based on this study alone,” Melissa Mroz-Planells, a registered dietitian nutritionist in private practice, told Healthline.

    Pesticides are known to be carcinogenic, but experts say reducing or eliminating them from agricultural production would require a significant overhaul of food supply systems.

    “The fact is, pesticides and herbicides are poison. They’re meant to kill pests and bugs. They were developed during wartime… and now are sprayed on almost everything and contaminate much of the food supply,” Dana Hunnes, PhD, a senior dietitian supervisor at UCLA Health, told Healthline. Hunnes wasn’t involved in the research.

    “They should be included/discussed in dietary guidelines, which is more a downstream approach, but ought to be regulated or eliminated if we want a more comprehensive upstream/public health approach. However, that requires political will, money to change how farmers and ranchers grow food, and a complete overhaul of food systems.”

    The reason for lung cancer rates among young non-smokers remains unknown, and the USC study offers just one theory yet to be confirmed.

    George Chaux, MD, a board certified interventional pulmonologist and medical director of Interventional Pulmonology at Providence Saint John’s Health Center in Santa Monica, CA, said it could be a number of factors contributing to the trend. Chaux wasn’t involved in the study.

    “The rising trend of lung cancer amongst younger non-smoking individuals is concerning but remains relatively rare and is mostly tied to ethnicity, such as Asian descent. There is likely to be some strong genetic predisposition together with an environmental exposure driving this,” he told Healthline.

    “Pesticides are known to be carcinogens, and there is a higher risk of lung cancer associated with heavy exposure, such as in agriculture workers, as cited in this study,” he said.

    “This is why washing your fruits and vegetables before eating raw foods is very important. I would not conclude from this data nor recommend that people stay away from a healthy diet of fruits and vegetables, which has been conclusively shown to improve overall health, including risk of colon cancer and heart disease. I would also not necessarily recommend organic foods, which tend to be more expensive; the best approach is to wash your fruits and vegetables well before you eat them,” Chaux continued.

    Amy Bragagnini is a clinical oncology dietitian at Trinity Health Lacks Cancer Center. She wasn’t involved in the study but said that, regardless of whether produce is organic, rinsing before eating is a good idea.

    “When eating fresh produce, I first encourage my patients to thoroughly wash all produce that they consume, regardless of the produce being organic or conventional. Rinsing under cold water and using a light friction can reduce bacteria, dirt, chemicals, and pesticides,” she told Healthline.

    “In addition, I encourage my patients to frequent local farmers’ markets if they have one close to them and to grow their own produce if they are able. There is nothing more satisfying than picking ingredients for your family’s salad right out of your backyard,” Bragagnini said.

  • Stablecoins can help businesses turn costs into revenue, Paxos Labs cofounder says

    Stablecoins can help businesses turn costs into revenue, Paxos Labs cofounder says

    Stablecoins, the $300 billion class of digital dollars, may have started as a faster way to move money across the globe, but companies are now asking a different question: what can they actually do with them?

    That shift is driving a new phase of adoption, according to Chunda McCain, co-founder of Paxos Labs, who says the industry is moving beyond basic infrastructure toward real business use cases.

    “The first step was getting a stablecoin,” McCain said in an interview with CoinDesk. “The next question is: what now?”

    Last week, Paxos Labs underscored that direction by raising $12 million in a strategic funding round led by Blockchain Capital, with participation from Robot Ventures, Maelstrom and Uniswap. The lab unit was incubated under Paxos, the New York-based digital asset firm behind popular stablecoins such as PayPal’s $PYUSD ($PYUSD) and the Global Dollar (USDG). Paxos itself builds stablecoins and the immediate underlying infrastructure, while Paxos Labs intends to build tooling for further use of those stablecoins.

    With the fresh funds, Paxos Labs is building what it calls a “financial utility stack” that lets companies turn digital assets into products through a single integration.

    Its newly launched Amplify Suite bundles three core tools: Earn, which offers yield on digital assets; Borrow, which enables lending against them; and Mint, which supports branded stablecoin issuance. The idea behind that is to let firms integrate tokens into a business, then layer on capabilities over time.

    Turning cost into revenue

    For years, enterprise crypto adoption focused on “first-touch” capabilities like trading, custody or issuing a stablecoin. Those steps opened the door but rarely generated returns on their own, according to McCain

    “Stablecoins [have been] loss leaders for years,” he said.

    The opportunity lies in how those assets are used. Payments are a clear example: merchants typically give up 2% to 3% in fees, while stablecoin rails can reduce those costs and even generate yield on balances held onchain.

    “You turn what has always been a cost into revenue,” he said.

    Some of the more novel use cases sit at the intersection of payments and credit. Payment providers already track merchant revenues and cash flow, which puts them in a position to underwrite loans, McCain argued.

    That could allow merchants to access financing based on real-time performance, while earning yield on incoming payments and settling instantly across borders. These models are still early, but the building blocks are starting to come together, he said.

    Not every firm needs its own token

    To capture these benefits, not every firm needs its own stablecoin.

    While companies like PayPal have launched branded tokens to control payments and margins, issuing one requires significant investment in liquidity, compliance and distribution.

    “If you just need the economics, you don’t need to build your own,” McCain said.

    Many firms can instead integrate existing stablecoins and still benefit from lower costs and added yield.

    The shift may lack the hype when big firms like Western Union announce their own token, but it carries tangible impact on how businesses operate.

    Stablecoins are starting to reshape margins, unlock credit and change how money moves globally, especially where traditional systems remain costly or slow.

    “It might sound boring, but this is the math,” McCain said.