Author: rb809rb

  • Did TV chef Jamie Oliver win lawsuit against McDonald’s over ‘toxic’ food claims?

    Did TV chef Jamie Oliver win lawsuit against McDonald’s over ‘toxic’ food claims?

    • In August 2026, a claim spread that McDonald’s lost a lawsuit against the TV chef Jamie Oliver, who — according to posts — proved that the fast food chain’s food was “unfit for human consumption” because it was “highly toxic.” The claim is unproven. 
    • Snopes previously investigated a variation of this claim in 2018 and 2026. We found then and now that Oliver said in a 2011 TV program that beef trimmings used for a product he called “pink slime” were “not fit for human consumption.” We found no evidence that he specifically called McDonald’s food “unfit for human consumption” or “toxic,” as the posts suggested.
    • The American Meat Institute, a trade association that represents processors of meat and poultry, said in 2012 that beef trimmings used to make “pink slime,” which it calls Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings, were edible.
    • However, because we could not access a full version of the “Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution” episode where Oliver discussed “pink slime” to see if he specifically mentioned McDonald’s, we leave this claim unrated.

    • Snopes will update this report if, or when, additional information surfaces. We contacted Oliver and McDonald’s to ask whether Oliver has ever called the fast food chain’s food “unfit for human consumption” or “toxic” or whether McDonald’s ever lost a lawsuit involving Oliver and are waiting for responses.

    A claim (archived) circulated on Facebook in August 2026 that fast food chain McDonald’s lost a lawsuit against the TV chef Jamie Oliver after Oliver proved its food was “unfit for human consumption” because it was “highly toxic.”

    For example, one Facebook user wrote:

    McDonald’s loses lawsuit against chef Jamie Oliver, who proved that the food they sell is unfit for human consumption because it is highly toxic. 

    Chef Jamie Oliver won a lawsuit against the world’s largest fast-food chain. Oliver demonstrates how hamburgers are made. 

    According to Oliver, fatty cuts of meat are “washed” with ammonium hydroxide and then used to fill the hamburger patties. Even before this process, the TV presenter says, this meat was unfit for human consumption.

    Oliver, a radical activist chef taking on the food industry, says: “We are talking about meat that is sold as dog food and then served to humans. Aside from the quality of the meat, ammonium hydroxide is harmful to health.” Oliver calls it “the pink slime process.” What sane person would put a piece of meat soaked in ammonium hydroxide into a child’s mouth?

    Similar claims circulated elsewhere on Facebook (archived, archived, archived). Snopes readers contacted us about the claim, which we previously reported on in July 2026 and January 2018.

    The claim contained three parts: that McDonald’s sued Oliver, that Oliver made the comments about “pink slime” and that Oliver’s alleged comments were specifically about McDonald’s. 

    We found no evidence in online searches (archived, archived, archived) that McDonald’s ever lost a lawsuit involving Oliver. AFP Fact Check reported in December 2021 that Oliver had never taken legal action against McDonald’s.

    According to an excerpt of a 2011 episode of his program “Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution,” Oliver said that the meat used to produce a specific type of beef product that the celebrity chef called “pink slime” was “not fit for human consumption.” 

    McDonalds reportedly ceased using “pink slime,” which is also known as Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings, in their food in 2011, as we noted in 2018 when we fact-checked a previous version of this claim. Oliver did not mention McDonald’s specifically in excerpts of the 2011 episode of “Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution” that Snopes reviewed.

    However, because we could not access a full version of the “Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution” episode in question to see if it mentioned McDonald’s, we leave this claim unrated.

    Snopes contacted Oliver and McDonald’s to ask whether McDonald’s ever lost a lawsuit involving Oliver, whether Oliver had ever proved McDonald’s food was “unfit for human consumption” or “toxic” and to ask whether McDonald’s used Select Lean Beef Trimmings in 2026. We await replies to our queries.

    Oliver’s allegations

    In the first episode of the second season of his program “Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution,” in which Oliver attempted to reform school lunches and fight obesity in the U.S., the celebrity chef held a demonstration where he showed children and adults where on a cow different cuts of meat came from.

    According to a segment of the episode (archived) that an internet user uploaded to YouTube in 2016, after spray-painting prices on a live cow to show where various cuts were found, Oliver then addressed what happened to the remainder of the animal. 

    He said (time code 00:01), “The public loved seeing that, that, equalling a steak. They never for a minute thought I would clear all the meat and cuts away and introduce them to a new world of food. It’s called pink slime.”

    Oliver added (time code 00:12), “When you’ve broken down a whole beast, you’re left with trimmings. You know, in my industry, we call those trimmings [BLEEP].” 

    Speaking to a crowd of people, Oliver described the trimmings used for “pink slime” as (time code 00:36) “not fit for human consumption.”

    Oliver went on to say that processing plants took trimmings that were “not fit for human consumption,” separated the meat from the fat, killed harmful bacteria using ammonium hydroxide and sold the end product, which he called “pink slime,” as human-grade food. Ammonium hydroxide is a watery solution that can be used to regulate acidity in food or in hair dye or cosmetics.

    In an excerpt from the program included in a 2012 CBS report, Oliver said (time code 00:32), “We’re taking a product that would be sold at the cheapest form for dogs, and after this process we can give it to humans.”

    (Snopes could not locate a complete video of the “Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution” episode in question. The clips we have found online appeared genuine and did not indicate any signs of possible manipulation.)

    FDA says ammonium hydroxide ‘generally safe’

    Around 11 months after Oliver’s episode discussing “pink slime” aired, the American Meat Institute President J. Patrick Boyle issued a statement to say that Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings was “a safe, wholesome and nutritious form of beef” that helped prevent food waste by utilizing trimmings that would otherwise go to waste.

    The institute is a trade association that represents processors of meat and poultry.

    Boyle’s statement said, similarly to Oliver’s demonstration, that processing Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings involved first separating the meat from the fat and using “food grade ammonium hydroxide gas” to destroy bacteria before blending the product into foods like ground beef.

    However, he denied claims that the trimmings used to create Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings were not edible. The statement said:

    Some recent media reports created a troubling and inaccurate picture, particularly in their use of the colloquial term ‘pink slime.’ The fact is, BLBT is beef. The beef trimmings that are used to make BLBT are absolutely edible. In fact, no process can somehow make an inedible meat edible; it’s impossible. In reality, the BLBT production process simply removes fat and makes the remaining beef more lean and suited to a variety of beef products that satisfy consumers’ desire for leaner foods.

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which regulates ammonium hydroxide use in food, says the ingredient is “generally recognized as safe.” This was also the case when we last reported on these claims in 2018.

    In sum …

    While Oliver did call the cuts of meat used for Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings “not fit for human consumption” and claimed (time code 00:59) the product was “admitted to being in at least 70% of ground beef products” in a 2011 program, the episode excerpts Snopes reviewed did not show him specifically accusing McDonald’s of using the product or calling the fast food chain’s products toxic.

    McDonald’s said in a 2013 statement it had not used Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings in its products since 2011.

    We found no evidence that McDonald’s had lost a lawsuit involving Oliver since then. Given the prominence of McDonald’s and Oliver, such a lawsuit would have been widely reported by reputable sources. That was not the case.

    While the FDA generally recognizes ammonium hydroxide, which is used to process Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings, as safe, reporting by the publication Food Safety News claimed that fast food giants like McDonalds, Taco Bell and Burger King had all stopped using the product by January 2012.

    Both ABC, which broadcast Oliver’s program, and Oliver himself have faced lawsuits over their coverage of the product.

    ABC settled out of court in 2017 in a $1.9 billion defamation lawsuit brought by Beef Products Inc., a producer of Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings, over Oliver’s program and other stories the network had reported about the product in March and April 2012.

    A man who Beef Products Inc. laid off after negative press heavily affected the company’s sales sued Oliver, ABC and other defendants in 2012. He dropped the case in 2013.

    Snopes’ archives contributed to this report.

  • ‘SNL UK’ Adds ‘Such Brave Girls’ Star Freddie Meredith

    ‘SNL UK’ Adds ‘Such Brave Girls’ Star Freddie Meredith

    Such Brave Girls star Freddie Meredith has joined the cast of Saturday Night Live UK ahead of its season two premiere.

    Fresh off his Edinburgh Fringe Festival debut with comedy show Need a Light?, nominated for the best newcomer award, the Brit joins the returning SNL UK ensemble: Hammed Animashaun, Ayoade Bamgboye, Larry Dean, Celeste Dring, George Fouracres, Ania Magliano, Annabel Marlow, Al Nash, Jack Shep, Emma Sidi and Paddy Young.

    Meredith, also known for his performance in Channel 4’s Big Boys, most recently featured in Kat Sadler’s twisted female-driven comedy Such Brave Girls on the BBC. He plays Josie’s embarrassingly needy and oblivious husband, Seb.

    Among his comedy heroes are Jamie Demetriou, Tim Key, Tina Fey, Nathan Fielder, Kristen Wiig, Steve Coogan, Steve Carrell and Julia Davis. Meredith said about joining the show: “It will undoubtedly inform everything I do for the rest of my career, and I can’t wait for the experience.”

    “I trained at drama school and began working professionally in theater,” Meredith added about his background. “Over time, I found myself increasingly drawn to comedy and started doing stand‑up alongside my acting work, and that naturally led me into making short sketches online.”

    The next season of SNL UK is set to kick off on Sep. 12 with host Jeff Goldblum and musical guest CMAT. Broadcast live each week, the U.K. spinoff of NBC’s hit sketch series will once again welcome a different celebrity host and musical guest for every episode, alongside topical sketches, live music performances and a British take on the iconic Weekend Update segment.

    Last season’s celebrity hosts included Tina Fey — in a premiere that accrued an audience of over 220,000 — as well as Jamie Dornan, Riz Ahmed, Jack Whitehall, Nicola Coughlan, Aimee Lou Wood, Hannah Waddingham, and Ncuti Gatwa.

    SNL mastermind Lorne Michaels serves as executive producer on the show, and James Longman is lead producer.

  • The Next James Bond Has Been Picked, Says Gary Oldman, Whose ‘Fingers Are Crossed’ for ‘Slow Horses’ Co-Star Jack Lowden

    The Next James Bond Has Been Picked, Says Gary Oldman, Whose ‘Fingers Are Crossed’ for ‘Slow Horses’ Co-Star Jack Lowden

    Gary Oldman‘s connection to the world of James Bond may be unknown, but the actor claims to have some key information about the casting of the next 007.

    According to the Oscar-winning acting icon, the hotly-disputed and widely-debated hunt to find the next superspy is over, and he’s hoping his “Slow Horses” co-star Jack Lowden is the name ready to be unveiled.

    “It’s been rumored that [Lowden] is on the shortlist,” Oldman said in an interview with Canada’s “The Morning Show.” “We’re going to find out pretty soon, aren’t we? Because they have picked him. They have made their choice, but they have not announced it yet. So my fingers are crossed for Jack.”

    Wild rumors have swirled for years over who is set step to step into the blood-splattered brogues of Daniel Craig, but with the next film set to go into production next year, speculation has ramped up considerably.

    While nothing has been confirmed as the casting is kept under arguably the tightest wrap of any film production, Callum Turner, Jacob Elordi, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Harris Dickinson and Lowden have all been reported as among those in the final running. Variety wrote that there had been interest in Louis Partridge, while stage star Tom Francis had reportedly auditioned. Amazon MGM has repeatedly refused to discuss anything about who has or hasn’t been considered for the role.

    Denis Villeneuve is set to direct the next Bond film, which is being written by “Peaky Blinders” creator Steven Knight.

    Last month, Lowden’s wife Saoirse Ronan threw down the gauntlet to Bond producers about her being involved in the next film, telling Empire that she was “dead serious” about playing a Bond villain. “I think it would be really interesting, having a young female villain,” she said. “Especially for girls and women, to see someone who can just take all that pent-up anger and direct it somewhere, there’s something interesting in that dramatically. So I would love to do more of that.”

  • Laura Poitras Shares the Desperate Vision Behind Her ICE Documentary ‘They’re Here’: “What’s Happening in the United States Is a Nightmare”

    Laura Poitras Shares the Desperate Vision Behind Her ICE Documentary ‘They’re Here’: “What’s Happening in the United States Is a Nightmare”

    Oscar-winning filmmaker Laura Poitras spoke bluntly at the Venice Film Festival Monday about the motivations behind her latest project, They’re Here, a 25-minute documentary that viscerally chronicles the Minneapolis resistance movement to ICE’s paramilitary occupation last year.

    “We believed in a sense of urgency in documenting this,” Poitras said of the film origins. “What we’re seeing in the United States is a nightmare, and we feel what’s happening in the mainstream media is that this kind of violence is being normalized. We believe very strongly in the power of cinema to denormalize this violence and to show what’s happening, so that you can feel the sense of terror.”

    They’re Here is Poitras’s first project since her Nan Goldin documentary All the Beauty and the Bloodshed, which won the festival’s Golden Lion in 2022 and later earned an Oscar nomination. Poitras previously won the best documentary Oscar in 2015 for Citizenfour, her landmark account of Edward Snowden and his NSA surveillance disclosures.

    Poitras co-directed They’re Here with Minneapolis-based journalist and documentarian Rachel Lauren Mueller. Told in the style of dystopian sci-fi cinema, the film starts in a picturesque wintry American Midwest landscape — but this is Trump’s America in 2025, where masked men are soon shown abducting children, as residents hide in the trunks of cars to safely get to work. Elsewhere, everyday American vacationers mill about at Minneapolis’ airport, gazing out the windows at shackled prisoners being dragged onboard planes nearby. 

    They’re Here draws on dashcam footage, crowdsourced data visualizations and ground-level footage to reconstruct the resistance network and the cat-and-mouse surveillance tactics used by residents and ICE’s masked agents.

    “We were using the genres or language of dystopian cinema or horror to take us closer to reality, not to take us further away, and not to make fiction from reality,” Poitras explained in Venice. “This actually is the reality — the reality is a nightmare. The entire country is under attack, and immigrants are living in fear throughout the United States right now.”

    “Over the two Trump terms, we’ve seen that things have gotten more extreme, but people become used to certain things,” added Mueller. “So I think the real role of this film is to shake that up a bit — to change things from a space of intellectualization about these numbers and these images that we see, and to have it become more visceral again.”

    Poitras explained that the doc, like the resistance movement at its heart, emerged from a sense of solidarity with the immigrants who had made Minneapolis their home. 

    “It came from a real sense of, ‘These are our neighbors, and we don’t want them stolen from us. We want these people to stay safe,’” she said. 

    She also sees causes for both hope and despair in the Trump administration’s response to Minneapolis’ resistance, which she described as a “great success.”

    “At the end of the film, we say how these tens and hundreds of thousands of residents responded, and that ICE removed 80 percent of its agents. So there was a real response to this kind of resistance, which I think we can all take hope from,” she explained. “At the same time, ICE has a budget of $70 billion, which is just an astronomical amount of money. Additionally, in the last two months, 90,000 people were abducted. So it’s this is a record high that has happened in June and July. So ICE is absolutely still active. Their tactics just look very different now.”

    They’re Here is screening in Venice Open – Out of Competition, the festival’s nonfiction and special-presentation strand, and will have its world premiere in the Sala Grande on Monday afternoon. The film was produced by Mueller, Poitras and longtime Poitras collaborator Yoni Golijov, with ARTE France serving as co-producer. Submarine Entertainment Sales is handling U.S. sales.

  • Belgian Royalty Series ‘King of Hearts’ Secures Key VRT Backing (EXCLUSIVE)

    Belgian Royalty Series ‘King of Hearts’ Secures Key VRT Backing (EXCLUSIVE)

    Enterprising Flemish broadcaster VRT has boarded the historical coming-of-age drama series ‘King of Hearts’ from Giles Coulier, whose company, De Wereldvrede, is behind such hits as 2019 series “War of the Worlds” and Prix Europa winner, “Albatros.”

    As continental royalty series hit ratins and sales – think “Maxima” – “King of Hearts,” currently in development, has been selected to participate in the inaugural Euro-Atlantic Co-Pro Pitch program to be held at the Iberseries & Platino Industria confab in Madrid.

    Based on real events, the drama centers on Baudouin, introverted and insecure, who is made King before he is ready for the task. As Belgium descends into crisis and his family fractures around him, he is forced to confront the man and leader he wants to become. Under mounting pressure, he learns to make difficult choices, challenge his father’s influence and forge his own beliefs. But with power comes a darker temptation: to control others as he himself was once controlled.

    Later in life, he tries to protect his nephew Filip from the same painful path he went through. But he slowly realizes how hard it is to become a better man than the father who raised him.

    “We are thrilled we can once again work on a fiction series that sheds light on an important chapter in our recent history. As a public broadcaster, we believe it is essential to tell these stories, but always through emotionally compelling, surprising and strong storytelling,” said Elly Vervloet, VRT international drama expert.

    “’King of Hearts is the coming-of-age story of King Baudouin, who, as a young and unprepared prince, had to ascend the throne at a politically very delicate moment for our country and the whole world. We see him struggle to find his own voice, torn between power and responsibility, manipulated by people around him with their own agendas. We are thrilled that the producers and creators of De Wereldvrede approached us with this story, so that we can develop it further together into an ambitious and emotionally resonant series. We hope to bring some strong international partners on board to bring this fascinating story to audiences far beyond Belgium.”

    For producer Gilles De Schryver, who co-founded De Wereldvrede with Coulier in 2013, “King of Hearts” is by nature an international story. “It moves between Brussels, Leopoldville, Rome and Madrid, intertwining Belgium’s monarchy with Congolese independence, Cold War geopolitics and Catholic influence. It is designed as a high-value prestige drama with global story reach and appeal only an international co-production can deliver.”

    The project has secured script funding from the Flanders Audiovisual Fund (VAF), with a further VAF application pending.

    According to the partners, De Wereldvrede’s “mission is to produce high-quality fiction for an international market, with a strong emphasis on the creator’s vision and a bottom-up production approach.”

    The company broke through with the TV series “The Natives” (CANVAS), followed by Coulier’s feature film “Cargo,” which screened at numerous international festivals. Their short films have also earned recognition, including “Stephanie,” an official Cannes selection and winner of the Ensor for Best Short Film, and the series “Lockdown,” which won an award at Canneseries. “Roomies” (2022) received international acclaim.

    In 2024, the features “Holy Rosita” and “Julie Keeps Quiet” premiered internationally, earning numerous festival selections and awards. “Julie Keeps Quiet” premiered at Cannes Critics’ Week and was selected as Belgium’s official Oscar entry. Both films won five Ensor Awards.

    In October 2025, the second season of “Roomies,” by Kato De Boeck and Flo Van Deuren, premiered at Film Fest Gent to five-star reviews.

    Nathalie Teirlinck’s second feature, “Jonah Was Here,” is currently in post-production, while Pieter Van Hees’ latest film, “Alors on Danse,” is in advanced development and scheduled to shoot in summer 2027.

    De Wereldvrede is also developing several other projects, including the feature films “Harvest,” “The Right to Say Goodbye” and “Dirty Kids,” as well as the fiction series “Recidive” and “Beats of Love.”

    The 6th Iberseries & Platino Industria runs September 29 to October 2, 2026.

  • Bitcoin blinks less than gold when Treasury yields move

    Bitcoin blinks less than gold when Treasury yields move

    Bitcoin $BTC$79,394.02 may be a better hard asset than gold, according to a correlation study.

    Both have been rising recently, just as concerns about the fiscal health of advanced-economy governments have come to dominate market sentiment, pushing bond yields, or market-implied borrowing costs, higher.

    As of today, the 90-day correlation coefficient between $BTC and gold’s daily returns stands at 0.59, according to data from TradingView and CoinDesk. That’s the highest since 2020, when central banks and governments were printing truckloads of money to cushion the economy and markets during the pandemic.

    While both are viewed as hard assets that stand to benefit from fiscal worries and the prospect of financial repression, bitcoin seems to have a slight edge.

    The reason lies in its relationship with the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield, the benchmark borrowing cost that influences credit conditions across the economy (check Today’s Signal). An increasing bond yield is typically seen as a headwind for assets like gold and bitcoin, which just sit in investors’ portfolios without generating any new cash.

    Bitcoin’s correlation with the 10-year yield is negligibly negative, and notably weaker than gold’s.

  • ‘Sumo: Spirit Weighs Nothing’ Review: A Handsome Ode to an Oft-Disrespected Sport

    ‘Sumo: Spirit Weighs Nothing’ Review: A Handsome Ode to an Oft-Disrespected Sport

    The title of “Sumo: Spirit Weighs Nothing” is the closest that Erik Shirai‘s documentary comes to a joke at the expense of its subject: sumo wrestling, the Japanese sport largely known in the western world for the ample size and minimal clothing of its practitioners, and not an awful lot beyond that. In all other respects, however, this stately, artfully produced film aims to act as a corrective to such cheap, culturally insensitive perceptions. Examining as it does the motivations and ambitions of a number of sumo wrestlers, from grand masters to rising stars, through a solemnly respectful lens, the doc finds humanity and even beauty in what can all too easily be comically framed on screen.

    Indeed, the approach of Japanese-American docmaker Shirai (who previously probed a very different Japanese institution in his popular 2015 doc “The Birth of Saké”) is so respectful as to feel a touch sanitized: smoothed-out and simplified for the benefit of Western viewers, to whose perspective the film is mostly tailored. More unsavory aspects of the sport — including controversies over hazing and match-fixing, not to mention its ongoing exclusion of women from competition and ceremonies — are swept aside, while the compelling fact of its declining popularity in Japan is only passingly addressed. Only before the closing credits roll is it revealed how few yokozuna (the name given to men achieving the highest rank in sumo) this century have been homegrown, as Mongolia and the U.S. step into the breach.

    Shedding more light on such matters would provide a richer context for the film’s reverent celebration of sumo tradition, but many viewers will still find it an illuminating and exquisitely mounted study, ennobling the sport with the sheer, studied splendor of its imagery, captured alternately in atmospherically high-contrast monochrome and tea-stained sepia tones. Produced by ESPN Films, it will doubtless find a dedicated broadcast and streaming viewership following its premiere as the opening film of Venice’s audience-oriented Spotlight competition.

    Early on, the camera observes a group of rookie wrestlers, training at the Tokyo stable of 62-year-old Master Sakaigawa, as they collectively recite a pledge to the sport: “We shall uphold our responsibility and duty to to sumo; we shall uphold a strong heart, kindness and courage.” This is followed by a droll shot of trainees all putting their freshly laundered thongs out to dry: For all its earnestness, the film is not without offhand humor. In the house of Sakaigawa, we meet Hiradoumi, a 24-year-old upstart tipped for big things in the ring (or dohyō, to use its proper term), and a great hope for continued Japanese representation in the sport’s top tier. In the same stable, and younger still, is teenager Yonezawaryu, still learning the ropes, and battling doubts over his long-term commitment to sumo after witnessing firsthand the extreme, potentially fatal, physical toll it takes on the body.

    At the opposite end of the career scale is Mongolian-born Terunofuji, who at the time of filming was the only practicing yokozuna in sumo, a 10-time title winner considering retirement after 14 years in the sport, five of them at the very top. He is spoken of as a veteran, positively godly in status, though he’s only 33 years old. Age, however, doesn’t mean quite what it does to civilians in a realm where so much transformational strain is placed on the body, and Terunofuji’s is beginning to fail him. “By doing sumo, I’m cutting my lifespan by 10 to 20 years,” he frankly admits, before likening the travails of the professional wrestler to those of a soldier going to war. He’s now married with a son — it’s hard not to wonder if, at the end of his reign, he thinks it was all worth it.

    It’s one of a few questions that this handsome, sober documentary is too polite to ask. But it does convey the grand, challenging physicality of sumo, which to many of its students qualifies as an answer in itself. There’s also a thoughtful focus here on the pain and labor that goes into building and maintaining these extraordinary bodies — shot, by Shirai and fellow DP Hiroshi Hara, in awed chiaroscuro portraits that line up with the men’s view of themselves as warriors of a kind, leaving far behind many racist, cartoonish depictions of yore.

  • UK regulator weighs easing financial prediction market ban: Times

    UK regulator weighs easing financial prediction market ban: Times

    Britain’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has held talks with trading platforms about potentially easing its ban on financial prediction markets for retail investors, according to a report by The Times.

    Prediction markets let users take yes-or-no positions on the outcome of future events across various categories, including economics, sports, and weather. The FCA treats contracts linked to financial and certain weather events as binary options, whose sale to retail investors has been prohibited since 2019.

    The regulator has weighed lifting the restriction as U.K. consumers increasingly access overseas platforms including market leaders Kalshi and Polymarket.

    The FCA’s public position continues to support that restriction. Its latest perimeter report said the ban remained appropriate because of the speculative nature of the contracts and the risk of consumer harm, while leaving open the possibility of further work on access or clarification of the regulatory boundary.

    Industry participants have been lobbying for a change, presenting officials with evidence that millions of Brits are using overseas prediction platforms, The Times reports. Some consumers bypass geographic restrictions using virtual private networks (VPNs), leaving them outside UK consumer protections.

  • Bitcoin Presents Both Danger and Opportunity! ETFs Are Strengthening, But This Data Is Alarming!

    Bitcoin Presents Both Danger and Opportunity! ETFs Are Strengthening, But This Data Is Alarming!

    Bitcoin has experienced sharp fluctuations in the past week. Having started September at around $78,000, $BTC surged above $82,000 during the week, reaching its highest level since May. However, it couldn’t maintain this level and fell back below $80,000.

    As of today, with Bitcoin falling below $80,000, data shows that US spot Bitcoin ETFs have recorded net inflows for the third consecutive week. Spot Ethereum ETFs also extended their inflow streak to three weeks, signaling a recovery in institutional demand.

    Positive Series in Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs!

    According to SoSoValue data, US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a net inflow of $986.9 million last week. This marks the third consecutive week of positive inflows into Bitcoin ETFs. The previous week, net inflows were $924.5 million.

    BlackRock’s IBIT fund stood out in weekly inflows, with total net inflows reaching approximately $3.8 billion over the past three weeks. This period marks the strongest three-week inflow streak for Bitcoin ETFs in 2026.

    Spot Ethereum ETFs also saw a net inflow of $218.4 million last week. This marks the third consecutive week of positive inflows into Ethereum ETFs.

    ETFs continued their strong performance in August. Spot Bitcoin ETFs saw net inflows of $3.52 billion during the month, while spot Ethereum ETFs saw net inflows of $1.85 billion. This monthly inflow into Bitcoin ETFs was the strongest monthly performance since September 2025.

    Bitcoin Prediction: $82,000-$85,000!

    Speaking to The Block, Zeus Research analyst Dominic John stated that the bullish pattern in Bitcoin will remain valid if the $80,000 level is maintained.

    At this point, the analyst predicted that $BTC’s uptrend would remain strong as long as it held above the $80,000 level, and that prices would gradually rise towards $82,000-$85,000. The analyst noted that the next significant upward move could depend on macroeconomic developments.

    John noted that continued ETF inflows indicate that institutions are increasing their $BTC investments and that real spot demand is recovering.

    The Biggest Risk for Bitcoin is Inflation!

    Presto Research analyst Min Jung said the crypto market is starting to close the gap with other risky assets and that ETF inflows indicate a recovery in institutional demand.

    However, Jung considers higher-than-expected US inflation data a significant risk that could dampen the upward trend in Bitcoin.

    *This is not investment advice.

  • Maria Bartiromo’s Fox Exit “Self-Inflicted Wound”; Trump Praises “True Warrior” As Legal Threats & Accusations Of Host Sharing Insider Info Fly

    Maria Bartiromo’s Fox Exit “Self-Inflicted Wound”; Trump Praises “True Warrior” As Legal Threats & Accusations Of Host Sharing Insider Info Fly

    EXCLUSIVE: The coup de grâce that caused Fox to announce this week that Maria Bartiromo would “no longer be with” the conservative news outlet was a case of “very bad judgment” and a long time coming, sources say.

    The assertions come Friday despite Bartiromo’s Hollywood attorney Bryan Freedman insisting the veteran Wall Street anchor is still “an employee” of Fox and threatening legal action. Adding to the burgeoning media mess surrounding the so-called “Money Honey,” Donald Trump had thrown serious shade on Fox for taking good pal Bartiromo off the air.

    That shade could set the stage for yet another showdown between Trump and his once favorite media buddies at the Murdoch-ruled Fox.

    “I can’t believe Maria Bartiromo is no longer going to have her great show(s) on FoxNews/Business,” Trump, a frequent Bartiromo guest, posted Thursday night, about 12 hours after Fox announced “effective today” that the Mornings With Maria host was out. “Three different shows, always number one. Maria is a total professional, and a true warrior. Her fans, of which there are many, will not be happy. God bless you, Maria!”

    Bartiromo hadn’t been on the air for almost a month, with Deadline confirming that Fox brass had enough of the MAGA-friendly Bartiromo after they learned she passed corporate-guidance missives to the White House in recent months. However, carving her own way at Fox Business and Fox News for more than a decade, those communications were just the latest minefield that Fox execs feared could blow up in everyone’s faces.

    “Her indiscretion was just the latest in a series of self-inflicted wounds,” a cable news insider says of Bartiromo and her close ties with Trump. “This has been a concern for a while, Maria being too cozy with the White House. She crossed a line, and she’s suffered the consequences.”

    Weary of addressing allegations of similar conduct over the years by Sean Hannity and other Fox hosts, or Bartiromo’s contract specifics, the source added: “She’s no longer with Fox. Take that for what it is.”

    Deadline hears that while there may be “technical truth” to Freedman’s remarks today that Bartiromo still works at Fox because of contracts and other paperwork, she is not returning to her Fox Business or Fox News roles — full stop.

    Long a passionate defender of POTUS and offering him a platform over the years, Bartiromo’s apparent sharing of internal edicts with Trump administration officials, first reported by Status, made her pink-slipping inevitable.

    Digging a little deeper and a few years back, the seeds of Bartiromo’s downfall were evident if you connect the red string.

    In April 2023, Fox agreed to pay $787 million to settle a lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems, one of the technology firms singled out in Fox’s coverage of the 2020 election results. Citied in volumes of court filings and the high-stakes trial that had just begun when Fox settled, Bartiromo was one of the main hosts on Fox promoting the false claims of irregularities with the election Trump lost and Joe Biden won. At the time, the top-rated Tucker Carlson was pulled off the air at Fox in a move that resulted in a Freedman-handled legal dust-up between Carlson and the media company.

    No word from ex-Apprentice host Trump if Bartiromo is in the running to be the new White House Press Secretary, but sharp-elbowed lawyer Freedman says his client actually isn’t looking for a new job because she still has her old one.

    “For many years, Maria Bartiromo hosted three number one rated television shows on Fox channels,” Freedman said Friday, as my colleague Dade Hayes noted earlier. “She has been, without question, one of the hardest working journalists throughout her award winning career.”

    The lawyer for the likes of Carlson and Megyn Kelly, as well as Don Lemon, then unsheathed the knife that may lead to a bloody affair down the line.

    “The irresponsible reports that have been published stating that Maria Bartiromo was fired or is no longer an employee of Fox are absolutely and unequivocally false,” Freedman said. “Make no mistake, we have the receipts and witnesses and they will come out whether through the courthouse or otherwise. Those reporting her firing or the incredulous facts supporting that fiction have exhibited a complete and utter reckless disregard for the truth.”

    When Deadline asked Fox for a response to Freedman’s statement about his client’s employment situation, the company said: “the release speaks for itself.” The White House did not respond to Deadline’s request for comment.