“We would be buyers on weakness,” he said.
TD Cowen’s Lance Vitanza made a similar case, arguing that the hack exposed weaknesses in Binance’s security rather than in the technology behind bitcoin BTC$76,789.53 or other cryptocurrencies.
“We do not stop using dollars when a bank is robbed, just as car theft does not invalidate the automobile,” Vitanza wrote.
The distinction matters because the attack appears to have targeted Binance’s transaction-signing infrastructure, not the Bitcoin network itself. Vitanza said the selloff could offer investors a chance to add to bitcoin positions and shares of companies that hold the cryptocurrency on their balance sheets.
At Compass Point, analysts Ed Engel and Michael Donovan argued that Binance could probably afford to make customers whole. They pointed to Binance’s reported holdings, including $1.2 billion in excess USDT reserves, roughly $1.2 billion in bitcoin reserves and more than $1.5 billion in USDC treasury assets.
“We believe Binance has more than enough liquidity to cover the hole,” they wrote.
That doesn’t mean the fallout will be painless.
Compass Point expects pressure on stablecoin supply as Binance reimburses customers and warned that withdrawals from decentralized lending platforms could pick up once markets reopen.
The hack could also send business to Binance rivals, including Coinbase and Bullish BLSH$25.68 (the parent company of CoinDesk), as well as decentralized exchanges such as Hyperliquid (HYPE), where users trade without handing custody of their assets to an exchange.
Leave a Reply