The College Football Playoff is underway, and has already seen some surprising results. No. 10 Miami (FL) upset No. 2 Ohio State 24-14 as a 7.5-point underdog on New Year’s Eve, followed by No. 6 Ole Miss defeating No. 3 Georgia 39-34 on New Year’s Day as a 6-point ‘dog.
Teams that had a bye are now 1-7 in the CFP quarterfinal round over the past two seasons.
Advertisement
Here are the odds for the semifinal matchups (courtesy of BetMGM) and the full College Football Playoff rankings:
College Football Playoff semifinal games
-
No. 1 Indiana (-4, 47.5) vs. No. 5 Oregon
No. 6 Ole Miss vs No. 10 Miami (FL) (-3, 52.5)
ATS winner: Miami (FL) -3
Over/under: Over 52.5
College Football Playoff quarterfinal games
No. 10 Miami (FL) vs. No. 2 Ohio State (-7.5, 39.5)
ATS winner: Miami (FL) +7.5
Over/under: Under 39.5
No. 5 Oregon vs. No. 4 Texas Tech (-1.5, 50.5)
ATS winner: Oregon +1.5
Over/under: Under 50.5
No. 9 Alabama vs. No. 1 Indiana (-7.5, 46.5)
ATS winner: Indiana -7.5
Over/under: Under 46.5
No. 6 Ole Miss vs. No. 3 Georgia (-6, 53)
ATS winner: Ole Miss +6
Advertisement
Over/under: Over 53
College Football Playoff first-round games
No. 9 Alabama (-2.5, 42.5) at No. 8 Oklahoma
ATS winner: Alabama +2.5
Over/under: Over 42.5
No. 10 Miami (FL) at No. 7 Texas A&M (-3, 48.5)
ATS winner: Miami (FL) +3
Over/under: Under 48.5
No. 11 Tulane at No. 6 Ole Miss (-16.5, 57.5)
ATS winner: Ole Miss -16.5
Over/under: Under 57.5
No. 12 James Madison at No. 5 Oregon (-20.5, 47.5)
ATS winner: James Madison +20.5
Over/under: Over 47.5
First-round byes
1. Indiana (13-0)
2. Ohio State (12-1)
3. Georgia (12-1)
4. Texas Tech (12-1)
5. Oregon (11-1)
6. Ole Miss (11-1)
Advertisement
7. Texas A&M (11-1)
8. Oklahoma (10-2)
9. Alabama (10-3)
10. Miami (10-2)
11. Notre Dame (10-2)
12. BYU (11-2)
13. Texas (9-3)
14. Vanderbilt (10-2)
15. Utah (10-2)
16. USC (9-3)
17. Arizona (9-3)
18. Michigan (9-3)
19. Virginia (10-3)
20. Tulane (11-2)
21. Houston (9-3)
22. Georgia Tech (9-3)
23. Iowa (8-4)
24. James Madison (12-1)
25. North Texas (11-2)
Leave a Reply