Category: Sport

  • Puka Nacua’s brother didn’t mean to take car from Lakers rookie Adou Thiero, who won’t pursue charges: Report

    While the older brother of Los Angeles Rams star receiver Puka Nacua was arrested last month for allegedly taking the car of Los Angeles Lakers rookie Adou Thiero without his consent, NBC4 Los Angeles reported Thursday that the incident turned out to be an accident and that Thiero won’t pursue charges.

    The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department told NBC4 that Samson Nacua, 27, took Thiero’s car thinking it was his brother’s SUV, which is the same model and color and only about one or two years older.

    Advertisement

    The car, originally reported stolen, was tracked to the 1 Hotel in West Hollywood.

    Not only was Samson Nacua arrested, but so was Trey Rose, another 27-year-old who rode in the car. Rose told deputies he didn’t even know that the car was reported stolen, the LASD said, per NBC4. He reportedly was swiftly cleared once investigators acquired more information about the incident.

    Thiero recognized that it was a mistake and chose not to push for prosecution, according to NBC4, which also reported that deputies ultimately requested the L.A. County Attorney’s Office reject the case.

    Thiero is a first-year forward for the Lakers. The Brooklyn Nets selected him in the second round of last year’s draft with the No. 36 overall pick, but he was then traded to L.A. in the NBA-record, seven-team deal that delivered Kevin Durant to the Houston Rockets.

    Advertisement

    He played his college ball at Kentucky and Arkansas. So far with the Lakers, Thiero has appeared in 15 games, averaging only 5.8 minutes and 1.3 points across those outings.

    As for Samson Nacua, he’s a wide receiver like Puka. And he, too, played at BYU. That’s where he finished his college career, following his stay at the University of Utah. Between the two schools, Nacua spent five seasons, amassing 1,344 receiving yards and 15 total touchdowns along the way.

    He went undrafted in 2022 and has tried to catch on in the NFL since.

    While Puka Nacua has starred in the league, Samson has played in the USFL and UFL, including for the Michigan Panthers. While playing for the Panthers last year, he was notably suspended one game for slapping a fan.

    Advertisement

    He was just selected by the Birmingham Stallions in this year’s UFL Draft.

    Last month’s news of Samson’s arrest coincided with a turbulent week for the Nacua family. Puka, amid his second Pro Bowl season, was fined $25,000 for his comments about the league’s officiating, which he voiced on a live stream with Adin Ross and on X mere minutes after a Week 16 overtime loss to the Seattle Seahawks. He then apologized, just as he had done after promising he would perform an antisemitic touchdown celebration on Ross’ stream. Nacua said in a statement that, at the time of the stream, he had “no idea” the act “was antisemitic in nature.”

  • Giants to hire John Harbaugh + Divisional Round Preview (ft. Kyle Van Noy)

    Subscribe to Inside Coverage

    Who will come out on top of the Divisional Round of the playoffs this weekend? Yahoo Sports’ Andrew Siciliano and Frank Schwab are joined by special guest LB Kyle Van Noy to preview the AFC’s matchups. But first, they dive into John Harbaugh reportedly signing a 5-year $100M deal to become head coach of the New York Giants. Kyle delivers his unique insight from their shared time together with the Baltimore Ravens. Later in the show, Andrew and Frank are joined by betting analyst Ben Fawkes to turn the page towards the NFC’s marquee matchups, before closing things out with their “One More Thing.”

    Advertisement

    (4:00) – KVN on John Harbaugh, Ravens coaching search and more

    (21:36) – Bills @ Broncos

    (31:15) – Texans @ Patriots

    (37:38) – 49ers @ Seahawks

    (50:40) – Rams @ Bears

    (59:18) – One More Thing

    How will the New York Giants operate with new head coach John Harbaugh? (Photo by Kevin Sabitus/Getty Images)

    How will the New York Giants operate with new head coach John Harbaugh? (Photo by Kevin Sabitus/Getty Images)

    🖥️ Watch this full episode on YouTube

    Check out the rest of the Yahoo Sports podcast family at https://apple.co/3zEuTQj or at Yahoo Sports Podcasts

  • Divisional fantasy preview + Prop Bets + DFS: The matchups, players & bets you CAN’T ignore this weekend

    Subscribe to Yahoo Fantasy Forecast

    Divisional round weekend is right around the corner and we have Matt Harmon and Joel Smyth here to get you ready. The two preview each game and provide their favorite matchups and prop bets along the way. Smyth also shares his favorite DFS lineup for Divisional weekend.

    Advertisement

    (5:00) #6 Bills @ #1 Broncos

    (21:50) #6 49ers @ #1 Seahawks

    (37:35) #5 Texans @ #2 Patriots

    (49:00) #5 Rams @ #2 Bears

    (1:01:50) Joel’s Divisional Round DFS Lineup

    Divisional round weekend is right around the corner and we have Matt Harmon and Joel Smyth here to get you ready. The two preview each game and provide their favorite matchups and prop bets along the way. Smyth also shares his favorite DFS lineup for Divisional weekend.

    Divisional round weekend is right around the corner and we have Matt Harmon and Joel Smyth here to get you ready. The two preview each game and provide their favorite matchups and prop bets along the way. Smyth also shares his favorite DFS lineup for Divisional weekend.

    (Jason Jung)

    🖥️ Watch this full episode on YouTube

    Check out the rest of the Yahoo Sports podcast family at https://apple.co/3zEuTQj or yahoosports.tv

  • Bears continue flirtation with Indiana move, welcome state’s bill to create stadium authority

    The Chicago Bears are preparing for a playoff clash with the Los Angeles Rams, and also possibly a move out of Illinois.

    Bears president Kevin Warren floated a move to northwest Indiana last month in a letter to season-ticket holders amid a standoff with the Illinois legislature over a replacement for Soldier Field. The state of Indiana took a major step to return that interest with the introduction of Indiana Senate Bill 27.

    Advertisement

    The bill would establish a northwest Indiana stadium authority and counts two major lawmakers among its authors, majority floor leader Chris Garten and appropriations chair Ryan Mishler. The authority would be tasked with acquiring, financing, constructing and leasing what’s needed to construct an NFL stadium.

    The move comes only a day after Indiana Gov. Mike Braun said, “We are working hard to bring the Chicago Bears to the Hoosier State” in his State of the State address. Per the Indianapolis Star, House Speaker Todd Huston told reporters that the task could be accomplished without opening the budget this year.

    The Bears released a statement Thursday evening welcoming the move, via NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport:

    “The legislation presented by the State of Indiana is a significant milestone in our discussions around a potential stadium development in Chicagoland’s Northwest Indiana region. We appreciate the leadership and responsiveness of Governor Braun and Indiana lawmakers in advancing a framework that allows these conversations to move forward productively.”

    Figuring out their post-Soldier Field future has been a protracted process for the Bears. The team has made it clear it isn’t interested in renovating its home of the past half-century, as former mayor Lori Lightfoot proposed in 2022. Soldier Field is the NFL’s smallest stadium by seating capacity at 61,500 and the league’s oldest stadium at 101 years old.

    Advertisement

    Instead, the team has both floated a new lakefront stadium near Soldier Field (projected price tag: $4.6 billion) and purchased land for a domed venue in the suburb of Arlington Heights (projected price tag: more than $5 billion). Both plans would require billions in taxpayer support.

    The Arlington Heights plan was the team’s preferred move going into the winter, but hit a major stumbling block when Illinois state leaders allegedly told the team the project wouldn’t be a priority in 2026. That’s what prompted Warren’s statement opening the door for Indiana to step in.

    Earlier this week, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell visited the Bears for their wild-card game against the Green Bay Packers and spent some pregame time touring both the Arlington Heights site and multiple proposed sites in northwest Indiana. It wasn’t a subtle message.

    Advertisement

    The Bears’ Indiana flirtation might only be a play to leverage Illinois’ leadership, but Indiana certainly seems to be treating the interest as real.

  • NFL divisional round preview: 1 key for each matchup, including Drake Maye deep shots and Bears’ biggest (literally) advantage

    The NFL’s divisional round is often considered the best weekend of football. Eight teams, all with a reasonable (at worst) shot at the Lombardi Trophy, playing each other for the right to earn a trip to the conference championship game. What will be the keys this year?

    (Games listed in order of schedule.)

    Advertisement

    Bills at Broncos

    Key matchup: Bills’ ‘mirror’ fronts vs. Bo Nix and Broncos’ offense

    What I love about the playoffs is how hyper specific the game plans can be, especially with experienced coaching staffs. Third down and second-and-long (7 or more yards to go) are considered “passing downs” in the NFL, with offensive and defensive play-callers having a separate menu of plays on their call sheets for those situations.

    This is when you feel Bills head coach Sean McDermott come alive as a play-caller and designer. So while Buffalo’s run defense isn’t exactly threatening anybody right now (more on that in a bit), if the Bills can generate true dropback situations, that is when they can keep the play call more limited for Broncos head coach Sean Payton and his expansive playbook that features a bevy of screens, play action and other concepts that can move the pocket for Bo Nix.

    Advertisement

    One changeup that McDermott loves to throw is to run “mirror” fronts on passing downs against more dynamic quarterbacks who will look to scramble and extend plays (like Nix). I’ve talked about mirror fronts before, but it’s essentially just a modern usage of a quarterback spy. Defenses like to use a three-man front (also known as an “odd” front) with different coverages — typically a man variation that baits the quarterback to scramble — behind it. So the thinking is to flood the coverage with seven bodies while the three-man rush doesn’t have to truly worry about their pass rush lanes (so they can attack however they want), and that leaves a spy to chase a potentially flushed-out quarterback.

    The Bills ran mirror fronts against the Jaguars several times in their wild-card matchup, including on the game-sealing interception. With Nix’s tendency to bail out of the pocket to try and create something when his first read isn’t available, I could see this as a way to flush him out and force a less dangerous throw, perhaps with a zone coverage behind it to muddy up Nix’s reads. Three pass rushers was something the Bills deployed last year in their playoff win over the Broncos; there were five such dropbacks, per TruMedia.

    Nix’s underlying numbers have him as a top-10 quarterback against man coverage because it simplifies his reads and he’ll just take outside one-on-ones to Courtland Sutton or slot fade routes. But he’s a bottom-10 quarterback against zone coverage.

    Advertisement

    McDermott started using more drop-eight and mirror fronts over the past couple of seasons, and the Bills have deployed it on five or more snaps against a lot of the top quarterbacks who can run. They ran it nine snaps in Week 6 against Patrick Mahomes in 2022, and at least a half-dozen snaps in their matchups afterward; eight snaps against Lamar Jackson and the Ravens last season in their divisional round matchup; and six snaps against Joe Burrow and the Bengals in the playoffs the year before. Also, when the Bills and Broncos faced each other in Week 10 in 2023, Buffalo dropped eight into coverage 11 times against Russell Wilson and this Sean Payton offense, which is the most McDermott has ever done it.

    I think the Broncos will have an advantage running the ball in this game. The Bills’ run defense ranked among the league’s worst over the back half of the season and the Jaguars had no issues ripping off explosive runs last weekend. Defensive tackle Ed Oliver is practicing this week, and his return should definitely help, but the Broncos staying ahead of the sticks is what will help keep the Bills’ defense out of any exotic packages on passing downs. The Broncos rank sixth in rushing success rate since Week 10 and 19th in FTN’s rushing DVOA stat over the same time period, while the Bills defense ranked 19th and 30th in the same categories. Simplifying things for Nix and the Broncos’ offensive line that’s using a backup center will be paramount for Payton and staff.

    Mirror fronts and dropping eight is just one pitch that McDermott can throw in this game, but it’s something I’ll be focusing on any time this Broncos’ offense gets behind the sticks to see if the Bills use it to mitigate any passing threat.

    The Bills have a run game that could roll a bit against the aggressive Broncos defense. The Bills’ offensive line is beefy and James Cook and Ray Davis both do a nice job of putting their foot in the ground and getting north to knife through the defensive flow. Against a defensive that thrives on creating chaos with its constant movement up front, it’s one way to help control the game, even if the Broncos are always going to have their moments with their excellent unit. The passing game is interesting because the Bills are down to three healthy wide receivers and are going against one of the league’s best cornerback room with Patrick Surtain II and Riley Moss patrolling the outside and the underrated Ja’Quan McMillian in the slot (McMillian is the “weakness” of this unit but has still played like an above-average starter this season).

    Advertisement

    The Bills will likely use their tight ends and Reggie Gilliam to base their offense in this game, but Tyrell Shavers’ blocking and vertical threat will be missed even in those personnel groupings and the Broncos’ defense has still been a top unit against heavier personnel groupings this season. I’ll be interested to see how Josh Allen and offensive coordinator Joe Brady decide to attack the Broncos team through the air. Is it trying to get Dalton Kincaid on a safety or McMillian? Is it plenty of James Cook underneath? Allen is going to have his touches on the ground, but how he decides to attack the Broncos on the backend is more of a question mark that I can’t wait to see answered rather than anything I am keen on predicting. Either way, it’s going to be a doozy.

    49ers at Seahawks

    Key matchup: 49ers’ beleaguered defense finding a way to pressure Sam Darnold

    This game will come down to whether the 49ers can create any pressure on Sam Darnold and the Seahawks’ offensive line. When Darnold is pressured this season, he is 26th in EPA per dropback and ranks 32nd in interception rate (in the bad way), had the third-most fumbles, averages 5.2 net yards per attempt (which ranks 11th) and has the highest rate of balls batted down at the line of scrimmage among the 36 NFL quarterbacks with 200 or more pass attempts this season. When he’s not pressured, he’s first in net yards per attempt (9.4) and ranks eighth in EPA per dropback and cuts his turnover rate in half.

    Advertisement

    The issue is that the 49ers have perhaps the most toothless pass rush in the NFL this season, especially after Nick Bosa and first-round draft pick Mykel Williams went down with injuries. The 49ers’ defense ranks 32nd in sack rate, 30th in knockdown rate (quarterback hits and sacks) and 30th in pressure rate. Coordinator Robert Saleh has a defensive structure that bases itself on a quarters structure and two-way play from its linebackers and safeties, constantly rushing four and pushing the onus on the spine of the defense to clamp down against the run and on throws over the middle. This philosophy is fantastic when you have Fred Warner roaming the middle of the defense, not so much when you’re playing a recently promoted-off-the-practice-squad Eric Kendricks (to be fair, Kendricks had several strong moments last weekend against the Eagles).

    Does Saleh break tendencies and try to heat up Darnold, speeding up his decision-making and turning this side of the ball into a gash-or-be-gashed type contest? Perhaps creating some explosive plays on defense will turn the whole thing into a slopfest that comes down to a few big plays. The Seahawks put up only 13 points when these teams faced off in Week 18, but they moved the ball with big chunks in the second half. And Seattle’s offense had other strong moments in between the sporadic botches. I don’t like to wave away anything in the NFL, especially in the playoffs, but Saleh is going to have to reach extra deep to try and get Darnold and his decision-making to spiral.

    Kyle Shanahan has been doing some of his best work this season, adding new layers and tweaks to his staples while also bobbing and weaving with a lineup of players that has been in and out (mostly in) the training room and on injured reserve all season. The Seahawks limited the 49ers to one successful run and just two explosive plays in their Week 18 matchup for the No. 1 seed in the NFC. The Seahawks’ coverage smothered the 49ers’ third-down pass plays and forced Purdy into double-clutching the football constantly before the Seahawks collapsed the pocket like orcs storming through the walls of Helm’s Deep. Shanahan will always have new wrinkles in these games, and should have a few big shot plays that connect, but it’s going to be even tougher sledding against this strong Seahawks defense with Mike Macdonald having another week to prepare.

    Advertisement

    Texans at Patriots

    Key matchup: Drake Maye taking deep shots vs. Texans, especially on late downs

    The Houston Texans’ defense went on the road and forced Aaron Rodgers into one of the worst statistical performances we’ve seen from a quarterback in the NFL playoffs. Since 2013, there have been 283 instances when an NFL quarterback has thrown 20 or more pass attempts in a playoff game; Rodgers’ EPA per dropback (-.76) and dropback success rate (21.2%) against the Texans in the wild-card round rank 283rd.

    The Texans’ defense simply flies around. While it’s not quite as simple as rolling the ball out and playing, Houston’s philosophy isn’t that much different! More than any other defense playing now, Houston has the most shared DNA with the Seahawks’ Legion of Boom defenses from a decade ago (which you can even trace from head coach DeMeco Ryans’ time in San Francisco).

    Advertisement

    On early downs, the Texans use a heavy chunk of zone coverage out of quarters shells, either staying in a Cover 4 looking or rotate down to Cover 3, with a few other looks sprinkled in. They keep things in front of them, and then unleash on pass-catchers and running backs like a horde of zombies (the fast kind) that see a fresh body in front of them. On late downs, it’s primarily Cover 1 (man coverage) and Cover 3 from the Texans. They play iso ball on defense, daring the pass blockers to hold up for longer than three seconds and the quarterback to find something against a defensive back group that turns every passing play into a wrestling schmoz.

    The playoffs turn into a hyperfixation of weaknesses because that’s what other teams are trying to exploit. The Texans don’t have many holes to exploit, especially with how little fat their scheme has. For Patriots quarterback Drake Maye, one of those holes is launching throws, especially when he gets some of those single-high coverage shell opportunities.

    Because of how aggressive and top-down the entire Texans defense is, it can leave them a little susceptible to deeper targets. On throws of 20 or more air yards, the Texans’ defense ranks 18th in EPA per play. On throws of 20 or fewer air yards, they rank first. It’s splitting hairs (the Texans still rank in the top 10 in terms of success rate), but fighting fire with fire is a way to keep the Texans honest and from teeing off on every other play.

    Advertisement

    The Patriots’ wide receiver room might not have incredible deep threats like Indianapolis’ Alec Pierce, who had four catches for 132 yards and two touchdowns in Week 18 against the Texans. But they have a quarterback willing to launch it in Maye, and DeMario “Pop” Douglas provides a threat. (The Texans are a tad weaker against slot deep targets, too).

    On late downs, the Texans lean more toward playing man coverage and single-high — and thus creating one-on-ones, something Maye has particularly loved to attack this season. Maye ranks fifth in air yards per pass (12) against single-high looks on late downs this season. He also ranks first in EPA per dropback (.53), explosive pass rate (25%), success rate (57%) and net yards per attempt (10.9), with seven rushing first downs on eight scramble attempts for good measure. So, pretty good.

    The other side of the ball feels more like a wash, not to discount it because the Texans’ offense has really come into its own since Week 10 and Milton Williams and Christian Barmore are a monster duo in the middle for New England. But Maye against this Texans’ defense is a flamethrower versus flamethrower battle that can leave both sides burned and us, the viewing public, very entertained.

    Rams at Bears

    Key matchup: Bears’ size at pass-catcher vs. smaller Rams defense

    I think the Rams have a clear advantage on offense against the Bears, with …

    Advertisement

    • The best run offense in the NFL (and quite literally this century, if using running back success rate as your barometer) vs. a bad run defense, especially when bigger bodies are on the field

    • An amazing power slot in Puka Nacua vs. a defense that’s been bad defending the slot all season

    • And a quarterback in Matthew Stafford who has the arm (and the health, per himself) to throw through any weather issues that crop up in Chicago in January

    Having a bevy of tight ends and Davante Adams sure helps, too. The Panthers showed that using add-on pressures (as in, a player adds on or “Green Dogs” to the blitz when a running back protects another defender) is a way to speed up Stafford. Which is something that Bears defensive coordinator Dennis Allen, a coach who doesn’t exactly need his arm twisted to dial up a blitz, might be looking at as a way to fight fire with fire.

    On the other side of the ball, it gets really interesting.

    Condensed formations (with players packed more tightly to the ball), especially with in-breaking routes, are something that I’ve seen generate big plays against the Rams. The structure of the Rams’ defense, which has moving parts after the snap and tries to stay capped over the offense (think playing top-down or outside-in), can end up being vulnerable to voids over the middle of the field. Especially as they attempt to sort out motions and switch releases at the snap. The Rams allowed the fifth-highest success rate against passes from condensed formations this season while giving up a healthy chunk of explosives and first downs on those plays. The Bears have utilized condensed formations at the third-highest rate this season, behind only the 49ers and Seahawks, divisional opponents that recorded three of the four highest dropback success rates against this Rams defense this season.

    Advertisement

    Another thing that’s caught my eye with these two units is the sheer size of their players. Los Angeles has a feisty front that is constantly attacking and moving around, sacrificing some size with sheer speed and agility. The Rams also play with a lot of defensive backs, but they (particularly the cornerbacks) are not very big, something that’s showed up recently for this defense. In L.A.’s wild-card matchup, the average weight of the Rams’ defensive backs was listed at 195.2 pounds. The Bears’ top seven pass catchers this season weigh, on average, 226 pounds.

    Another offense that features jumbo players at their pass-catcher spots? The Panthers, who were able to hit big plays in both matchups this season against a Rams defense that has consistently ranked high in metrics but has shown to be vulnerable in a few areas. The Panthers’ pass-catchers in the wild-card round averaged 224.8 pounds, and that’s including 174-pound Jimmy Horn Jr. Remove him, and the Panthers threw to wide receivers and tight ends that on average weighed 232 pounds. The smallest (I use that term relatively) listed non-Horn pass catcher for the Panthers were wide receivers Tetairoa McMillan and Brycen Tremayne, both at 212 pounds. The biggest defensive back for the Rams is safety Kamren Kinchens, listed at 207 pounds. The smallest Bears primary pass catcher is 199-pound Olamide Zaccheaus. Then it’s 210-pound Luther Burden III. The Bears feature a big offense.

    Time and again, that size came into play for the Panthers. Jalen Coker capped off his strong finish to the season with the best game of his career (he’s in line for a potential breakout in 2026), and McMillan, the likely Offensive Rookie of the Year, also had a good game. They combined for over 200 yards through the air and also had big moments in their first matchup with the Rams.

    Advertisement

    Size and speed are the core foundation markers of athleticism. As games turn colder and yards are harder to come by, size can be the great equalizer in both the run game and passing game.

    Well, that, or some special team shenanigans, the cruel and tragic kind that seem to crop up for both the Rams this season and for the Bears (and their opponents). Especially at Soldier Field.

  • Dodgers land Kyle Tucker on 4-year, $240 million deal in biggest swing of MLB free agency

    Kyle Tucker, this winter’s top free agent, has a new team. It is the two-time defending champion Los Angeles Dodgers.

    After a single season with the Cubs, Tucker is joining the Dodgers on a four-year, $240 million deal, according to ESPN’s Jeff Passan and Jesse Rogers. The deal reportedly contains opt-outs after the second and third years.

    Advertisement

    Per Jon Heyman of the New York Post, $30 million of the money is deferred.

    The Dodgers introduced Tucker on Jan. 21.

    The $60 million average annual value is the second-largest in MLB history, behind only that of Tucker’s new teammate, Shohei Ohtani. However, when accounting for the considerable deferrals in Ohtani’s $70 million-per-year deal, Tucker’s is effectively the most expensive contract in MLB history on a per-year basis, whether it ends up being a two-year, $120 million deal or goes the full term.

    Tucker joining the Dodgers is a shock particularly because the buzz before Thursday night seemed to favor the Toronto Blue Jays, who had reportedly offered Tucker the most years and therefore the most total money, or the New York Mets, who reportedly offered four years and $220 million with no deferred money. The Dodgers had been lingering on the periphery all offseason, though, and they ended up flexing their financial muscle. Again.

    Advertisement

    Missing out on Tucker is brutal for the Blue Jays in particular. The franchise just lost the 2025 World Series to the Dodgers in excruciating fashion and has now taken a free agency gut punch from L.A. three offseasons in a row. There was the famous plane incident with Ohtani, and the Jays were finalists for Roki Sasaki as well.

    With the opt-outs, Tucker will be able to reenter free agency before his age-31 season. If he’s productive in his two years with the Dodgers, he’s likely to draw a long-term contract then. This Tucker deal also lines up with how the Dodgers have approached some big free agents in the past, with huge money offered over a limited number of years. Tucker is the rare player to take it.

    The Cubs extended a qualifying offer to Tucker in early November, which he declined. As a result, Chicago will receive draft-pick compensation for the outfielder, while the Dodgers will be forgoing their second-, third-, fifth- and sixth-highest picks in the 2026 MLB Draft because they signed two players with QOs attached.

    [Get more L.A. news: Dodgers team feed]

    Kyle Tucker fills the Dodgers’ biggest hole

    With few contributors leaving the Dodgers, it might have been tempting to say the Dodgers didn’t need much help after they landed former New York Mets closer Edwin Díaz on a three-year, $69 million contract earlier this winter.

    Advertisement

    But that wasn’t quite true. The outfield loomed as a significant weakness, with a unit composed of something like Teoscar Hernández, Andy Pages, Alex Call and Tommy Edman.

    That left something to be desired, as Hernández has proven to be a defensive liability in left field, Pages is coming off perhaps the worst postseason in MLB history, Call projects mostly as a right-handed platoon bat, and Edman was limited for most of 2025 due to ankle issues.

    It seemed likely the Dodgers would go for another outfielder, and they decided to do the most expensive thing possible. With Tucker aboard, they can play him in right field, move Hernández to left and use a combination of Pages and Edman in center. Or maybe they’ll sign Cody Bellinger, too. Who knows?

    Advertisement

    Signing Tucker on a short-term deal also makes sense because of their farm system. Some baseball fans aren’t going to like hearing this, but the Dodgers have one of the top farm systems in baseball, primarily thanks to a plethora of outfield prospects.

    Josue De Paula (No. 13), Zyhir Hope (No. 20), Eduardo Quintero (No. 34) and Mike Sirota (No. 64) are all in MLB Pipeline’s top 100 prospects, and all have ETAs to the majors ranging from 2026 to ’28. The Tucker deal gives the Dodgers zero reason to rush any of those guys, and at least one of them figures to be an acceptable replacement if Tucker opts out after 2027.

    What will the Dodgers’ lineup look like with Kyle Tucker?

    Dodgers manager Dave Roberts has no shortage of options as the team tries to pursue the first MLB three-peat in 25 years, but he could roll out something like:

    Advertisement

    1. Shohei Ohtani, DH
    2. Kyle Tucker, RF
    3. Will Smith, C
    4. Freddie Freeman, 1B
    5. Mookie Betts, SS
    6. Teoscar Hernández, LF
    7. Max Muncy, 3B
    8. Tommy Edman, 2B
    9. Andy Pages, CF

    Oh, and the rotation is Ohtani, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Blake Snell, Tyler Glasnow, Sasaki and one of Emmet Sheehan, River Ryan or Gavin Stone. Plus, they just signed the best closer in baseball.

    You don’t need us to tell you the Dodgers are the favorites to win the 2026 World Series.

    Kyle Tucker was MLB’s top free agent, but he had some issues in 2025

    Tucker, the top player in Yahoo Sports’ free agency rankings, has been a consistent middle-of-the-order hitter for much of his career, with two Silver Sluggers and a Gold Glove to his name. Although he’s coming off an on-and-off season with the Cubs, Tucker has plenty to add to the Dodgers’ already stocked lineup.

    Advertisement

    After spending the first seven years of his MLB career with the Houston Astros, Tucker was sent to the Cubs last offseason as part of a blockbuster deal. Chicago acquired Tucker knowing he was set to become a free agent this winter, but the team was willing to make a gamble for one year of the versatile outfielder.

    Tucker’s time in Chicago started great, with the outfielder putting up his usual superb numbers and earning his fourth straight All-Star nod. But after the All-Star break, Tucker began to slump while dealing with injuries.

    The outfielder’s numbers dropped in the summer, with the team revealing in August that he had been diagnosed with a hairline fracture in his right hand two months earlier. Once Tucker started to get back into form, he was placed on the injured list due to calf tightness in September and missed more than three weeks.

    Overall, the year was a tale of two halves for Tucker: He batted .231/.360/.378 in the second half of the season while playing through those injuries, as opposed to a .280/.384/.499 slash line in the first half.

    Advertisement

    When Tucker is healthy, he can be a significant offensive boost to any lineup. And even with the injury-hampered season, 2025 was a productive year by many standards for the outfielder, who finished the regular season with 133 hits and 22 home runs, plus 25 stolen bases.

    Tucker’s consistency is also a key part of his appeal: Since 2020, when he became an every-day major-leaguer, he has posted an OPS above .800 across six seasons. That stat puts Tucker in elite company and makes him one of the most reliable batters in the league.

  • Josh Lowe traded from Rays to Angels in 3-team deal with Reds involving Gavin Lux, Brock Burke

    The Tampa Bay Rays, Cincinnati Reds and Los Angeles Angels completed a three-team trade Thursday, as reported by ESPN’s Jeff Passan.

    Outfielder Josh Lowe went from the Rays to the Angels, infielder Gavin Lux and minor-league pitcher Chris Clark are going to Tampa Bay, and left-handed reliever Brock Burke is going from the Angels to the Reds in the deal.

    Lowe, who turns 28 on Feb. 2, is arguably the biggest piece in this deal. Last season, the right fielder batted .220/.283/.366 with 21 doubles, 11 home runs, 40 RBI and 18 stolen bases in 108 games for the Rays.

    Advertisement

    Tampa Bay’s 2016 first-round draft pick (No. 13 overall), Lowe had his best season in 2023, when he hit 20 homers with 83 RBI and 32 steals, batting .292/.335/.500. He is eligible for arbitration for the first time this year, giving the Angels three years of club control.

    In return, the Rays get Lux, who hit .269/.350/.374 with five homers and 53 RBI in his lone season for the Reds after being acquired from the Los Angeles Dodgers. He has one more season of arbitration eligibility before becoming a free agent. In six MLB seasons, Lux is a .256/.332/.381 batter with 33 homers and 208 RBI. He has mostly played second base but has also appeared at shortstop, left field and center field.

    Additionally, Tampa Bay adds Clark from Anaheim. The right-hander, 24, mostly pitched in Single-A last year, eventually advancing to High-A and Double-A. Overall, he compiled a 4.73 ERA and 4-10 record with 153 strikeouts in 144 2/3 innings. Clark was the Angels’ fifth-round selection in 2023 out of Harvard.

    Advertisement

    Burke goes to Cincinnati after pitching the past two seasons with the Angels. Last year, the left-hander notched a 3.36 ERA with 52 strikeouts in 61 1/3 innings. Burke, 29, was a third-round pick by the Rays in 2014, and he reached the major leagues with the Texas Rangers in 2019. In five MLB seasons, he has a 3.88 ERA with a rate of 8.5 strikeouts per nine innings.

  • Here’s how big the Dodgers’ payroll is about to get after landing Kyle Tucker

    The Los Angeles Dodgers were the two-time defending World Series champions and the most expensive team in MLB history. And then they landed Kyle Tucker.

    More specifically, they reportedly got the former Chicago Cubs star to agree to a four-year, $240 million contract, which is effectively the most expensive deal in MLB history on a per-year basis, when taking into account the deferrals in Shohei Ohtani’s $70 million-per-year deal.

    Advertisement

    It is an outrageous development. The Dodgers needed outfield help, yes, but teams with a record payroll aren’t supposed to go out and grab the most expensive guy on the market on a deal even larger than expected. MLB has tried over the past several years to discourage its biggest spenders from making the game appear even more unfair, and the Dodgers are laughing at them through a megaphone purchased with Ohtani bucks.

    How big does this make the Dodgers’ payroll, which was the largest in MLB last season at $416.7 million per Spotrac? It’s now reportedly down to approximately $413.5 million, according to Spotrac.

    That might feel counterintuitive because, y’know, $60 million-per-year outfielder. Here’s why that’s the case.

    The Dodgers entered this offseason with plenty of room to spend

    The Dodgers had an enormous payroll and just added another big contract, but they saw a considerable number of contracts move off the books after 2025. And none of those contracts were for their biggest stars.

    Advertisement

    Michael Conforto ($17 million), Kirby Yates ($13 million), Chris Taylor ($13 million), Clayton Kershaw ($7.5 million), Kiké Hernández ($6.5 million), Michael Kopech ($5.2 million), Evan Phillips ($6.1 million), Tony Gonsolin ($5.4 million) and Austin Barnes ($3.5 million) made a combined $77.2 million last year and are now off the team via free agency, trades, non-tenders or retirement.

    Hernández was the only one of those players who made a significant contribution to the Dodgers’ World Series run. Using Baseball Reference’s calculation of Wins Above Replacement, that nine-man group combined for 0.3 WAR in the regular season.

    The Dodgers had also been spending modestly — by their standards — until the Tucker deal. Since the start of free agency, they had signed three players to major-league contracts: closer Edwin Díaz (three years, $69 million), infielder/World Series hero Miguel Rojas (one year, $5.5 million) and infielder Andy Ibañez (one year, $1.2 million).

    Advertisement

    Los Angeles was on track for a less expensive team in 2026 prior to the Tucker deal. Then the team opted to go moderately more expensive in order to add Yahoo Sports’ No. 1 MLB free agent.

    The Dodgers have more big contracts than any team in baseball

    Let’s go ahead and list them. Here is every Dodgers contract larger than $50 million total, without factoring in deferrals:

    • Shohei Ohtani: 10 years, $700 million

    • Mookie Betts: 12 years, $365 million

    • Yoshinobu Yamamoto: 12 years, $325 million

    • Kyle Tucker: four years, $240 million

    • Blake Snell: five years, $182 million

    • Freddie Freeman: six years, $162 million

    • Will Smith: 10 years, $140 million

    • Tyler Glasnow: five years, $136.5 million

    • Tommy Edman: five years, $74 million

    • Tanner Scott: four years, $72 million

    • Edwin Díaz: three years, $69 million

    • Teoscar Hernández: three years, $66 million

    Every contract except for Betts and Freeman has been signed since the end of the 2023 season. As for deferred money, let’s get into that.

    How much deferred money do the Dodgers have?

    Here is that same list, with the money the Dodgers will reportedly be paying after those contracts are over.

    Advertisement

    • Shohei Ohtani: $680 million

    • Mookie Betts: $115 million

    • Freddie Freeman: $57 million

    • Tanner Scott: $21 million

    • Edwin Díaz: $13.5 million

    • Teoscar Hernández: $23.5 million

    That adds up to $1.081 billion, and that’s not every Dodgers contract on the books. Obviously, Ohtani is doing most of the work there.

    By Spotrac’s calculations, the Dodgers are now on the hook for $2.11 billion in guaranteed salary when including deferrals.

    [Get more Dodgers news: L.A. team feed]

    We should also make a quick note about deferrals. The popular thinking is that teams that sign players to contracts with deferred money are kicking the can down the line and will someday have to come up with an enormous amount of cash. After all, we celebrate Bobby Bonilla Day for a reason.

    MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN - OCTOBER 04: Kyle Tucker #30 of the Chicago Cubs in action against the Milwaukee Brewers during Game One of the National League Division Series at American Family Field on October 04, 2025 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. (Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images)

    Kyle Tucker is going to cost the Dodgers a lot of money. They can afford it. (Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images)

    (Michael Reaves via Getty Images)

    However, the reality is more complicated than that. Under collective bargaining agreement rules, teams do have to put up “deferred money,” but that cash goes to escrow accounts instead of the players. Once it’s in those accounts, teams are under strict regulations for what they can do with it, but they are allowed to invest the cash in low-risk vehicles.

    Advertisement

    So that $680 million the Dodgers will owe Ohtani after 2033? They’ll have already put that money up while enjoying interest and modest returns. That’s not nothing when the total sum working for you is more than $1 billion.

    How much luxury tax will the Dodgers have to pay?

    Remember that $413 million mark above? It’s not the best representation of what the 2026 roster, as currently constructed, will cost the Dodgers.

    Last year, the Dodgers’ CBT number was $417 million. For that, the Dodgers had to pay a $169 million luxury tax bill, which was larger than the 2025 payrolls of 12 MLB teams. In total, the Dodgers paid $586.7 million for their championship roster. For 2026, Spotrac projects that tax bill to go down to $161.9 million, making the total cost around $575.6 million.

    Advertisement

    What’s ridiculous is their tax bill would have been around $99.1 million without the Tucker deal, which is rated at $57.1 million per year in CBT calculations due to the deferred money. Because overages are taxed at 110% at the Dodgers’ level, Tucker alone will make the Dodgers responsible for $62.8 million in tax money in 2026.

    So the Dodgers are basically paying $119.9 million to put Tucker in right field. Which is more than the current CBT payrolls of the Cleveland Guardians, Tampa Bay Rays and Miami Marlins.

    This is happening because of Shohei Ohtani

    You might be wondering, how did we get here? How is there a team making the George Steinbrenner Yankees look like a scrappy underdog?

    Advertisement

    It’s Ohtani.

    The Dodgers have a lot going for them structurally. They are the dominant team in MLB’s second-largest market. They have the largest stadium by capacity in MLB. They have the largest TV deal in the sport. They have a fan base with considerable spending power.

    That’s why the Dodgers were spending big and winning 100 games per season under their current ownership group. But this level of financial bombardment, which has now yielded back-to-back titles?

    It’s Ohtani.

    It is not hyperbole to say that Ohtani’s contract is the biggest bargain in all of sports, especially when considering the deferrals. The Dodgers don’t make much money from his jersey sales or the broadcast of their games in Japan (MLB divides both of those revenue streams among the 30 teams, so the Cincinnati Reds will make as much money from an Ohtani jersey as the Dodgers), but Ohtani has given them the one international star in baseball, combined with a premium brand and seemingly inevitable winning.

    Advertisement

    In the way some call Harvard a hedge fund with a university attached, the Dodgers are a Japanese advertising firm with a baseball team attached. The team has so much cultural cachet in Japan it can name its price for on-field advertisements and will be enjoying popularity in the world’s third-richest country for generations.

    Combine that with the usual outlay of winning a World Series, which the Dodgers have accomplished twice in as many seasons with Ohtani, and there’s nothing comparable in the landscape of MLB.

    Is a salary cap coming to MLB?

    The Tucker contract is going to make a lot of fans angry. It’s going to make some team owners angry. And so, we come to the salary cap question.

    Advertisement

    With MLB’s CBA up after 2026, many observers believe a labor stoppage is inevitable. MLB has already made it clear it wants a salary cap, which has been a non-starter with the MLB Players Association for decades.

    The Dodgers’ dominance has been treated as an endorsement for the salary cap to level the playing field of an unfair game. However, MLB quite likes it when the Dodgers are good. And the Yankees. And all of its biggest teams. The league has seen great ratings over the past two years, and the Dodgers are a major reason for that.

    It’s fun for some to imagine the Dodgers being forced to sell their team off if MLB gets its way with a salary cap. However, the reality will probably be less than satisfying for the biggest Dodgers haters, at least in the short term. MLB commissioner Rob Manfred wants to keep labor costs down, but he also wants the Dodgers to keep winning, to a reasonable degree.

    So what does the Tucker deal mean for the bigger picture? Maybe not much, especially when he only brought their payroll up to 2025 levels. And it’s hard to imagine the Dodgers haven’t already thought up some plans, depending on how the CBA negotiations go.

  • MLB free agency: What’s the latest on Cody Bellinger and Bo Bichette after Kyle Tucker’s big deal?

    UPDATE: Bo Bichette reportedly agreed to a 3-year, $126 million deal with the Mets on Jan. 16.

    When star third baseman Alex Bregman agreed to a deal with the Cubs, he ended a weeks-long deadlock atop the free-agent hitter market. A few days later, outfielder Kyle Tucker reached a megadeal with the Dodgers, knocking this winter’s top free agent off the board.

    Advertisement

    Since sluggers Kyle Schwarber and Pete Alonso agreed to deals with the Phillies and Orioles during the winter meetings in early December, the four remaining premier free-agent bats — Bregman, Tucker, Bo Bichette and Cody Bellinger — had lingered on the open market into the new year, waiting for interested suitors to step forward with sufficient offers. The Cubs surprised many in the industry by being the first team to pounce, landing Bregman with a five-year, $175 million deal with heavy deferrals. That sparked an intriguing response from Bregman’s former team, the Red Sox, with their reported five-year, $130 million deal with left-hander Ranger Suárez.

    Bregman’s decision — and Boston’s pivot to more pitching — offered some clarity on the priorities of the big-market teams involved, in turn providing a narrower selection of potential landing spots for Tucker, Bichette and Bellinger. Tucker clarified things further with his deal with L.A. And with pitchers and catchers scheduled to arrive at their respective complexes in Arizona and Florida in four weeks, reports indicate that we are rapidly approaching a resolution for the last two unsigned star hitters.

    With that in mind, here’s the latest on each of their markets and the scenarios still in play for this high-stakes game of musical chairs.

    Kyle Tucker

    Unlike the ultra-hyped sweepstakes for Shohei Ohtani and Juan Soto the past two winters — both of which wrapped up by mid-December — Tucker’s free agency as the top player available plodded along without much buzz until this week. Then the news dropped that Tucker had agreed to a four-year, $240 million deal with the Dodgers. They appear to have beaten the Blue Jays and Mets for the star outfielder.

    Advertisement

    The Blue Jays were the first team linked to Tucker when he reportedly visited their spring training complex in Dunedin, near Tucker’s hometown of Tampa, in early December. Evidently, that was merely an initial step. But in the month-plus since, Toronto’s interest sustained, and after the Jays signed third baseman Kazuma Okamoto earlier this month, it became clearer that Toronto was prioritizing pursuing Tucker over retaining homegrown star Bo Bichette.

    As Toronto loomed, the baseball world wondered if and when serious competition for Tucker would emerge. The deep-pocketed Mets and Dodgers were the obvious candidates for different reasons. The Dodgers’ outfield was a rare weak spot on their star-studded roster, and the Mets haven’t meaningfully improved their roster after a ton of high-profile exits. Still, it was unclear the lengths either club was willing to go to land Tucker.

    At first, reports highlighted a basic discrepancy: Toronto was willing to offer a long-term contract, while Los Angeles and New York preferred a shorter deal with a higher average annual value. But it was not until this week that we got a better idea of just how different those offers could be. While we now know Tucker ended up with a four-year deal, including reported opt-outs after the second and third seasons, several reports indicated that the Mets offered Tucker a short-team deal of at least three years with an annual salary averaging around $50 million. It turns out he got $60 million per year in L.A. Meanwhile, ESPN’s Jeff Passan said Wednesday on Sportsnet that Toronto was willing to offer Tucker a deal as long as 10 years at a far lower AAV with a much more substantial total amount. Given such a stark difference in the structure of the offers, what Tucker chose says a lot about his priorities.

    Now that he has made his decision, some key questions arise. Just how high will the payroll climb for the Dodgers? Will there be additional moves to offload other salary? Now that Tucker is headed to L.A., will the Blue Jays and Mets pivot to Bellinger? Will Toronto reengage with Bichette?

    Advertisement

    With Tucker off the board, the urgency for his suitors to do whatever it takes to sign one of the remaining free agents ramps up. Which brings us to …

    With Kyle Tucker (center) headed to the Dodgers, Bo Bichette and Cody Bellinger — Yahoo Sports' No. 4 and No. 7 free agents this winter — still need new teams with a month to go before spring training.

    With Kyle Tucker (center) headed to the Dodgers, Bo Bichette and Cody Bellinger — Yahoo Sports’ No. 4 and No. 7 free agents this winter — still need new teams with a month to go before spring training.

    (Hassan Ahmad/Yahoo Sports)

    Cody Bellinger

    At the outset of the offseason, there were three top-end free agents whose incumbent teams expressed strong intentions to retain them: Schwarber, Bregman and Bellinger. Bellinger is the only one who remains unsigned, but as the other two situations indicate, stated goals of keeping stars in-house don’t always come to fruition in the wild world of free agency.

    In the case of Bellinger and the Yankees, it still feels more likely than not that he returns, but the negotiations seem to be at something of a standstill. The biggest sticking point appears to be the length of the deal, as Bellinger and his agent, Scott Boras, are reportedly seeking a seven-year contract, while the Yankees’ most recent offer was five years with an AAV in excess of $30 million, bringing the total north of $150 million guaranteed. That would be right in line with, if not even a bit higher than most industry projections — MLB Trade Rumors and FanGraphs’ Ben Clemens both projected five years, $140M for Bellinger; ESPN’s Kiley McDaniel had six years, $165M; The Athletic’s Tim Britton had seven years, $182M — but Boras and Bellinger evidently aren’t satisfied yet.

    Advertisement

    It’s unclear what would motivate the Yankees to increase their offer if their competition for Bellinger remains murky at best. This is where Tucker’s decision looms large, as it’s possible Boras was waiting for a Tucker resolution to spark added interest in Bellinger from teams that fell short with Tucker. That’s a reasonable course to take from a negotiation standpoint, but it’s also plausible that Bellinger is set on staying in the Bronx and the Yankees just need to stretch a bit further — perhaps compromise at six years — to seal the deal.

    Bo Bichette

    And then there’s Bo. Bichette now occupies an interesting position atop the market post-Bregman, as the number of teams that both have the spending power to land a star free-agent such as Bichette and are in the market for an infielder is surprisingly small.

    Advertisement

    The Red Sox looked like natural candidates to pursue Bichette after Bregman bolted, but their agreement with Suárez indicated otherwise, and at this point, Boston appears more likely to add to its offense via trade than with a high-dollar hitter in free agency. And the Sox aren’t the only team that fits that description; other contending clubs such as the Mariners, Giants, Guardians and Royals seem more focused on exploring the trade market for upgrades in the infield, with Brendan Donovan and Nico Hoerner both bandied about as potentially on the move. The Yankees have reportedly checked in on Bichette, too, perhaps as a backup plan for Bellinger, but his fit in the Bronx would require some maneuvers that don’t seem likely at this stage.

    With the incumbent Blue Jays focused on adding an outfielder — infielders Ernie Clement and Andrés Giménez are both under contract for three more years, whereas there’s long-term uncertainty in the outfield, with Daulton Varsho and George Springer both slated to hit free agency after this season — a reunion with Bichette does not look especially likely, barring a drastic, late change of plans. As such, Bichette’s longstanding sentiments about wanting to stay a Blue Jay don’t seem to be reciprocated by Toronto enough to make that a reality.

    Fortunately for Bichette, an attractive alternative to start a new chapter has emerged late in the process: the Philadelphia Phillies. At first glance, Philadelphia is fairly set in the infield, with superstar anchors Trea Turner and Bryce Harper flanked by Alec Bohm and Bryson Stott at third and second base, respectively. But Bohm is entering the final year of his contract, and the Phillies have been exploring trading him for quite some time. Stott, meanwhile, has blossomed into a steady presence at second for Philadelphia, but he also has experience at third, which could allow Philadelphia to sign Bichette to handle second — an expected transition off his natural shortstop — move Stott to third and trade Bohm.

    Add the recent hire of Don Mattingly, with whom Bichette grew close during Mattingly’s three-year stint as Toronto’s bench coach, and Philadelphia offers a level of familiarity and comfort that other suitors cannot. Bichette and the Phillies reportedly had a productive meeting earlier this week. So barring any late entrants here, it might be just a matter of constructing an offer worthy of Bichette’s signature. President of baseball operations Dave Dombrowski usually succeeds in landing his top targets; we’ll see if Bichette becomes his latest superstar addition in a legendary front-office career chock-full of them.

  • What the Thunder exposed about the Rockets — and why their slump can’t be ignored ahead of trade deadline

    HOUSTON — By the time the Oklahoma City Thunder drilled their third triple in the span of a 60-second early fourth-quarter stretch, Rockets head coach Ime Udoka, livid from his team’s compounding mistakes, stormed the court heading straight for Reed Sheppard.

    Sheppard, the culprit for two of the three wide-open looks — a mixup in coverage and communication — could only hang his head while Udoka admonished the second-year guard all the way to his seat on the bench, before attempting to salvage what was left of the game.

    Advertisement

    Houston’s accumulation of mistakes had turned a rather tight contest up until that point into a nine-point deficit the Rockets never recovered from. But Udoka’s outburst wasn’t simply an isolated incident in a lengthy regular season. It was a clear reminder of the gap that exists between both franchises, an illustration of the razor-thin margin for error against the elite — and a possible indication that Houston’s prior stance toward the trade market might need revisiting weeks before the deadline.

    “Every game matters for us and we haven’t been playing our best,” Udoka said following Houston’s 111-91 blowout loss. “Regardless of record or whatever, we need to continue to focus on what we’re doing.”

    Thursday night’s offensive fiasco was a microcosm of the issues surrounding this talented Rockets team as of late. The Thunder’s defensive game plan was simple: swarm Kevin Durant first and foremost, sending extra help on drives and potential pull-ups and lean on physicality to mitigate Alperen Şengün’s impact around the elbows. For nearly 40 minutes, Durant had no room to breathe, with arms, feet and everything but the kitchen sink in his way — that he finished with just 19 points on 23 shots is no surprise, nor is Şengün’s 14 points on 15 shots.

    Advertisement

    “I felt like I missed some good shots to be honest,” Durant said. “But they swarmed the paint, we got up 104 looks. My shot-making is supposed to inspire the whole group so when I’m not making shots, it takes away from us. I just gotta be more prepared and fundamentally sound. A few shots I rushed or was looking for a foul. I just gotta be better.”

    Jan 15, 2026; Houston, Texas, USA; Houston Rockets forward Kevin Durant (7) shoots the ball during the second quarter against the Oklahoma City Thunder at Toyota Center. Mandatory Credit: Troy Taormina-Imagn Images

    Kevin Durant struggled to find clean looks against Oklahoma City on Thursday, a snapshot of Houston’s growing offensive issues.

    (IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect / REUTERS)

    But just how Houston labored — struggling to capitalize on 4-on-3s, failing to take full advantage of its dominance on the offensive glass (25 points from 23 offensive rebounds) and another anemic shooting night (29% from 3, 33% from the field) — told a larger story of where this team needs fixing. The Rockets are about as deep of a basketball team as any of their rivals in the Western Conference, but are dealing with roster inconsistency and a lack of a quarterback that is starting to catch up with them.

    A little over a month ago, the Rockets were second in the West with a strong 15-5 record. They have gone 8-10, are currently losers of five out of their last seven, have a bottom-10 defense and, as of the new year, are 28th in offense. That they even sit in sixth place (23-15), half a game outside of the play-in, is a miracle and testament to the sheer individual talent on the roster.

    Advertisement

    (Dig a bit deeper, and their underlying numbers aren’t great, either. Since Dec. 5, Houston is 22nd in field-goal percentage, 26th in free-throw rate and 29th in turnover rate, per Cleaning the Glass. The Rockets are also a bottom-10 unit in passes made, assists, potential assists and drives per game. Combine that with the league’s second-slowest pace and you have a lethargic, inefficient, mistake-prone offense. That should be the furthest thing from reality on a team with two potential All-Stars.)

    [Subscribe to Yahoo Sports NBA on YouTube]

    Prior to the season, Houston laid forth a playmaking-by-committee plan; more opportunities for Şengün, Durant and Amen Thompson — along with Sheppard. But at essentially the halfway point of the season, it’s clear that Fred VanVleet’s absence is greater than previously advertised. Udoka’s quest for a sufficient in-game organizer has seen him call on JD Davison, a two-way scrappy guard, ahead of Sheppard, the No. 3 pick from the 2024 draft, over the past two games. It shouldn’t come as a surprise — Udoka has made decent usage out of his array of undersized guards, including veteran Aaron Holiday — but the Rockets’ desperation plays only further undermine their contention hopes over the next few months.

    For what it’s worth, the Rockets’ brass hasn’t signaled any aggressive intention to upgrade their current roster as they have in seasons past, opting not to react to what they deem a containable slump. The Rockets weren’t interested in Trae Young prior to him being dealt, nor are they interested in Ja Morant or a more experienced veteran like Chris Paul. They’re also less inclined to chase expensive names like LaMelo Ball or Darius Garland because of the potential complications that accompany blockbuster deals of that nature.

    Advertisement

    Houston, according to team sources, has had discussions with around half the league — with more incoming and outgoing calls expected over the next 10 days as the Feb. 5 trade deadline draws closer — but doesn’t have any firm offer in either direction that is cause for serious internal discussion. What they do have is an understanding of what they are willing to do and an inkling of what teams want. For instance, the Rockets received a number of calls surrounding Tari Eason prior to him becoming a starter, sources say — as well as inquiries on summer additions Dorian Finney-Smith and Clint Capela — but nothing, as mentioned earlier, was concrete.

    Their current cap constraints (Houston is hard-capped at the first apron) limit what they’re able to do on the open market, but the Rockets have signaled a willingness to move some of their draft capital if the right upgrade presents itself. Houston has a total of nine future first-round draft picks, including control of future firsts from Phoenix, Brooklyn and Dallas — as well as a slew of second-round picks.

    Advertisement

    At a glance, Houston’s cautious approach to the trade deadline is understandable given the current climate. But, if negative results persist and their slide down the standings continues, changes are likely to occur. And regardless of what is presumed to be atop the wishlist — proficient point guard help or wing scoring — the Rockets as currently constructed are a few notches below a championship roster and could benefit from an arrival or two before the window slams shut.